The Anointing Oil, Ampulla and Spoon - British Coronation Traditions 

Thanks very much, glad you enjoyed it!

The simple reason why the Anointing Oil was consecrated by the Orthodox Patriarch of Jerusalem is due to the fact that Anglican Orders are null & void (Apostolicae Curae 1896, Pope Leo XIII) & therefore, had to resort to the Orthodox for a valid but illicit consecration. An act (Consecration) which is totally schismatic & heretical.

Here, here! A magnificent gesture---may God, the King of kings, bless His Majesty The King through the consecration of this oil in His service. This will mark the first time since the Reformation that a bishop (Patriarch Theophilos of Jerusalem) recognised by the Orthodox, Catholic, and Anglican communions as having absolutely valid apostolic succession will have blessed the oil used in the monarch's anointing. May this only deepen the blessing imparted to King Charles III and Queen Camilla. God Save The King!

@@ryanhunter2987 The blessed Anointing Oil is certainly valid but utterly ILLICIT since the Orthodox & the Church of England are in a state of schism, cut off from the Catholic Church. Anglican Orders incurred invalidity under Cramner & Edward (son of Henry VIII). For this reason. Anglican clergy had to resort to Orthodoxy for valid, but again, illicit ordinations as pronounced by Pope Leo XIII in Apostolicar Curae, 1893.

My pleasure, glad you enjoyed it!

I make mine based of the book of exodus oil i always annoint myself before preying and such things.

​@@Jame629 in

I would love to be, perhaps they will notice I'm here.

I just emailed Dan Snow directly at History Hit recommending you, and attached the link to your channel. The quality of your work speaks for itself. But I praised it anyhow! 😂

And my email just got sent back to me. Dang it.

@@ffvvaacc that is really kind of you to try.

@@ffvvaacc thank you, that is kind of you to do that I'm really touched.

Thank you very much, glad you're enjoying my videos!

Thanks for your appreciation of my work, glad you are enjoying the series!

Allan should be part of the History Hit group as a medieval church art/architecture channel. Or history hit should sponsor him. A solid quality RU-vid channel I love is History Calling; she started during covid and she’s now either sponsored by History Hit or part of them. Listening to Allan is like getting free university lectures, he deserves a much wider audience.

Glad you're enjoying my channel so much! Thanks for your support!

@@ffvvaacc totally agree. I'm so thankful for him, his style and all the extra goodies 💗

Thanks very much, glad you enjoyed it!

Glad you enjoyed it, thanks for watching!

My pleasure, thanks for watching!

Thank you very much, I'm glad you enjoyed the video and I hope you enjoy the Coronation edition of The Antiquary 😊

Glad you enjoyed it, thanks for watching!

Thank you very much, glad you enjoyed it!

😆 Glad you enjoyed the video 😊

Glad you enjoyed it, thanks for watching!

So glad you're enjoying my channel, thanks for watching!

It has been in use since medieval times. The canopy used in 1953 was made for the coronation of Edward VII in 1902.

😆

@@QPRTokyo Obviously, besides being disrespectful and intolerant of other people’s valid questions and concerns, you are ignorant of Orthodox theology and liturgical practices. Unfortunately, this gives a very clear indication as to what kind of a person you are, and in my opinion, not a very nice one.

Maybe it's because Prince Philip was Greek. His mother Alice, and her Aunt Elizabeth are Orthodox Saints buried in Jerusalem, I believe.

@@MrMomo182 You may be right,. As an act of kindness recognizing the Greek Orthodox connection to the royal family, I have no difficulties at all. However, I would like some sort of an official explanation by the Greek Orthodox patriarch of Jerusalem as to why this unusual participation in a non Orthodox service is in accordance with Orthodox practice. Lastly, if the patriarch of the Greek Orthodox Church in Jerusalem has consecrated holy chrism, why would the archbishop of Canterbury need to “bless” it again. This is certainly an insult to the Greek Orthodox Church!

@Bluebell Flora Yes, your response makes perfect sense. Thank you very much indeed.

The Orthodox and the Reformation faiths share a common faith and interpretation of the nature of the Trinity. Only the Latin rite departs from the catholic teachings of the church. The Greek word Katholikos derives from Kata/according to And olios/the whole - the faith believed everywhere by all. It has never meant universal and had that been intend😮ed the bowdlerised Latin translation of the Creed would doubtless have used he perfectly accptable Latin word "universalis". The reason the Latin rite tried to appropriate the term has no theological significance. The Emperor Theodosius issued a legally binding Edict - Cunctos populos - in 380 which gave to those who embraced the Nicene formula of the reality of God as the three - Father, Son and Spirit in holy Trinity. All others are condemned as heretics. The Latin rite , as the encyclical Fides et Ratio demonstrates, is based not on Scripture or the Hebraic customs which underpin the church, but on the Classical philosophies of Plato and Aristotle. Therefore , that rite asserts that the reality of God is the Godhead and the three are merely "personae" which the Oxfo😊rd Latin Dictionary defines as masks worn by actors - ie not real. Consequently they deny that Christ has saved ( past tense intended) all who accept the free gift in faith - which is the consistent teaching of Scripture, in all bar the book attributed to James, who adopts the Hebrew concept of faith and works. By the way, Paul acknowledges " works" as the reason we were created. But they are acceptable only if freely offered as a RESPONSE to the free gift of divine grace. Any other understanding makes nonsense of Christianity as a religion, but is perfectly in accordance with Platonism/ neoPlatonism which are philosophies of social control perfectly in accord with a rite which claims ( wrongly, as it happens) to be THE hierarchical and monarchical and only expression of "the church". This defines the Latin rite as heresy., But don't t say it out loud.nIt upsets them. Consequently, the Orthodox and Reformation churches play together nicely and it is entirely suitable for the Patriarch of Jerusalem to consecrate the oils.

😆 indeed!

It's a separate one off David and larger than the usual format, so will need to be purchased separately. There will still be a regular May issue too, which has more coronation goodies in it to look forward to.

@@allanbarton Thank you, I've gone ahead and placed my order

@@djnunnelly thank you.

It's kept under lock and key. Pardon me if I am sceptical.

It's phenix .not eagle , pagen green man

Glad to be of assistance!

Watch part 1, it explains why.

Christco!😂

Such nasty iconoclast, a modern-day Oliver Cromwell, who is ready to break up, melt, and sell the English heritage.

Why? We celebrate the fact that traditional customs are retained by other cultures, yet despise similar customs in our own. The point of monarchy is to connect us with our past.

The King is the head of the Church of England. Why would it be separated?

The British King has no role in legislation; Church and State well separated unless you're a Boris-worshipper.

It's cute that you think medievalism is only present in monarchical sytems. It's everywhere, hierarchies and preferment are common in every institution, particularly progressive ones who are constantly monitoring for dissent from the courtiers.