Тёмный

The Armor-Crushing Power of America's Super Rifle 

Подписаться
Просмотров 75 тыс.
% 2 969

From the dense jungles of Vietnam to the harsh deserts of the Middle East, the American soldier has stood ready, M16 or M4 rifle in hand, for over six decades. Yet, the evolution of firepower has long dictated the terms of survival and victory.
As the battlefield changes, so must the tools of war. Driven by the urgent need for greater lethality and precision against adversaries of similar capabilities, such as Russia and China, the US Military has brought forth its newest weapons.
The Next Generation Squad Weapons program is engineered to dominate. The XM7 rifle and XM250 machine gun, developed by SIG Sauer, are the next leap in bolstering the combat effectiveness of American infantrymen for the decades to come.
Developed to simultaneously replace the venerated M4 from the M16 family of rifles and the M249 machine gun, the XM7 and XM250 feature an intermediate yet powerful 6.8-millimeter cartridge that drastically increases range, velocity and stopping power to penetrate enemy body armor at standoff ranges.
As if that was not enough, both weapons sport an innovative design that allows operators to customize them like never before while sharing common parts, making it easy for operators to maintain them under the stress of combat.
The integration of advanced technology into the XM7 and XM250 not only enhances their performance but also ensures American soldiers maintain a decisive edge in future conflicts. With these weapons, the U.S. military steps boldly into a new era of warfare, where precision and adaptability dictate the rules of engagement.

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

31 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 306   
@ericb.4358
@ericb.4358 Месяц назад
The M7 is a greatly improved battle rifle but the REAL revolution is the M157 VORTEX sight system. With laser range finding, temperature, barometric pressure, compass heading, inclinometer sensors working with the onboard ballistic engine this sight system give the solar an 80% (!!) hit probability at 600 to 700 meters. Thus not as much ammo needs to be carried with accuracy like that. BADASSERY!
@user-xt6bd4qm5g
@user-xt6bd4qm5g Месяц назад
Gives the solar. Wtf 😂😂😂
@srinivarma1320
@srinivarma1320 Месяц назад
Even if it runs out of batteries, its still an 6x scope
@TheOriginalFaxon
@TheOriginalFaxon Месяц назад
@@user-xt6bd4qm5g probably an autocorrect fail lol
@vulpo
@vulpo Месяц назад
What!? No AI?
@FunnyQuailMan
@FunnyQuailMan Месяц назад
It's pure wizardry. Looking through that scope, you just know it's a whole new ballgame.
@kdb1891
@kdb1891 24 дня назад
The block II was a significant upgrade over the standard M4 and the URGI is the pinnacle of M4 design and neither was even mentioned lol
@Gridlocked
@Gridlocked 24 дня назад
Block II and URGI modifications aren't really significant upgrades, at least when compared to the M7.
@kdb1891
@kdb1891 24 дня назад
@@Gridlocked well the M7 is a completely different gun. I mainly mentioned it because he said a couple times that the m4 just uses a standard handguard. The free float mlok and mid length gas system are way better than the old school m4 I own all three and they do shoot very differently
@johndoerr8853
@johndoerr8853 Месяц назад
I think it's a nice stop gap between 5.56 and 7.62, going with the 6.8 round. The thing they are going to find issues with is the same issue from Vietnam, if the platform gets moisture or dirt, will it still function? And the other two major issues came down to killing too many people, so no Intel chances and the weight of the rounds, greatly reducing viability. I was a SAW gunner most of my military career, and I always carried, what the officer's called, "too much ammo". But the fact is, I never ran out, regardless of the situation.
@user-og1ux8nr3i
@user-og1ux8nr3i Месяц назад
You have to carry more ammo when you don’t aim or have knock down power. Not talking about the SAW.
@galvinstanley3235
@galvinstanley3235 Месяц назад
It's pointless to have a bunch of ammo that doesn't work.
@user-og1ux8nr3i
@user-og1ux8nr3i Месяц назад
@@galvinstanley3235 -- what ammo is that?
@galvinstanley3235
@galvinstanley3235 Месяц назад
@@user-og1ux8nr3i It's proven that both 5.56 and 7.62 are worthless against modern day body armor.
@reggienotorious6824
@reggienotorious6824 Месяц назад
@@galvinstanley3235key is you have to be hit in an 8x11 square for it to work rest of your body squishy and full of blood vessels, aim low mid belly no plate real big problem aim high your hitting clavical area also full of important things, not to mention any angle from side
@VictorianAerialVision
@VictorianAerialVision Месяц назад
So many times i tried to wipe that dirty spot off my screen. 🤣
@notyouraveragegoldenpotato
@notyouraveragegoldenpotato 26 дней назад
Aw what the heck😂 me too
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
I was freaking out, thought my tv was shattered.
@Jmpr12
@Jmpr12 Месяц назад
Chris Bartocci of Small Arms solutions begs to differ.
@ostiariusalpha
@ostiariusalpha 26 дней назад
Chris has a lot of opinions, some of them are well supported and some are straight outta' his ass.
@MRmagnatron
@MRmagnatron 15 дней назад
​@ostiariusalpha opinions are like assholes, everyone's got one.
@ostiariusalpha
@ostiariusalpha 15 дней назад
@@MRmagnatron Some you keep clean with factual statements, and some are basically unwiped. Chris is a bit of both.
@leovitss
@leovitss Месяц назад
I have studied a good bit. Your understanding and conveying of this subject is awesome. Thank you for your hard work and study.
@brianmoore1164
@brianmoore1164 Месяц назад
You're gonna get lots of whining from members of meal team six that do not understand basic ballistics, but you made a good video.
@mmancino1982
@mmancino1982 Месяц назад
Always love that phrase. Meal team six😂 Second only to squeal team six
@OperatorJackYT
@OperatorJackYT Месяц назад
Real lol
@thekraken1173
@thekraken1173 Месяц назад
What do you mean a more powerfull cartridge has more recoil 😡😡😡
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
Its not about ballistics, its about weight. Can carry a lot more 556 than 762, out of two equally weighted packs. Anyone who doesn't think weight matters, needs to spend a few days carrying everything you own on your back, with a good chunk of that purely being loaded magazines.
@brianmoore1164
@brianmoore1164 Месяц назад
@mrhassell I was 12 years Infantry and 22 yrs military there meal team six. We ALL wanted a more powerful rifle and the riflemen were NEVER hauling the heaviest load.
@cascadianrangers728
@cascadianrangers728 Месяц назад
I'm an expert marksman and have used an m16 in combat fairly extensively and I really loved it. It was and still is an excellent weapon, and its tiny bullet will indeed lay someone in their grave if you do your part and aim well. All that being said, tho, I want one of these. I could do some serious work with this rifle , who doesn't appreciate more power, penetration and precision?
@Wolf-hh4rv
@Wolf-hh4rv 21 день назад
Just recoil I guess. Having done a lot with 7.62 and 5.56 the latter is much easier to keep on target. I had a choice and opted for the M16.
@CheekRunner
@CheekRunner 20 дней назад
@@Wolf-hh4rvweight
@richard_the_lion_farted
@richard_the_lion_farted Месяц назад
I enjoyed that, thank you for another great vid.
@markbrisec3972
@markbrisec3972 Месяц назад
I was sad to hear Sig Sauer won the contract for the M4/M16 replacement.. That General Dynamics rifle was awesome, and especially their caseless cartridges...
@frankcessna7345
@frankcessna7345 Месяц назад
Geez, suggest you fact check - General Dynamics - having NEVER produced a firearm had hundreds of stoppages…….
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
@@frankcessna7345 General Dynamics’ Next Generation Squad Weapon - The RM277. Maybe you should be fact checking yourself.
@frankcessna7345
@frankcessna7345 Месяц назад
@@mrhassell I stated - 1/. GD has never produced a production rifle…. Show me otherwise (2) GD case less ammunition was a failure. Show us otherwise…..
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
@@frankcessna7345 The GD RM277 assault rifle is developed by a consortium of companies, led by American industrial giant General Dynamics for the NGSW-R “Next Generation Squad Weapon - Rifle” program, funded by US Army. Besides GD, which acts as a system integrator and project leader, consortium also includes Beretta USA, which is responsible for the weapon itself, and True Velocity, which is responsible for new ammunition.
@ameritoast5174
@ameritoast5174 29 дней назад
I think they had three strikes against them from the start. One was it being a bullpup which I liked but it seems the army doesn't care for them. The second being they didnt really have a lmg contender and were just going to upgrade the SAW and make it lighter. Lastly the plastic bullet casings. I think its a good idea but it seems SIG went the safer route and the plastic casings was too much of a risk for them. I can see why SIG won it. They pretty much did what the contract wanted and the XM7 is starting to grow on me.
@noneyadamnbiznezz
@noneyadamnbiznezz 28 дней назад
The M16A2 and my old M16A4 used the 5.56x45 round, M855 green tip during the 03 Invasion and during 06-07 in Ramadi. Ive had squad members that in close work, clearing buildings and working inside a compressed environment having to fire 2-5 rounds at center mass (the torso) of a single individual from 5ft away to 55ft away. That is WHY TRAINED HARD IN FAILURE DRILLS, failure fire, that two on the chest and one head saying. If we didn’t it thru a heart or the dome you gonna have squeeze off one or more precious rounds.
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 29 дней назад
It wasnt terribly close between Sig, Texron, and GD. GD didn't offer a credible squad automatic (which was part of the program, and given that each contestant developed a proprietary cartridge for their entries, the Army couldnt pick "one from Column A amd one from Column B" - it was always going to be a *pair* of weapons from the same manufacturer. The Army wasnt going to rely on a bullpup, 20 or 25 round box magazine fed, heavy barrelled rifle for a squad light machinegun - they knew that was an obsolete idea since the end of WWII. The Textron, despite being something they had been trying to make since 2004, flat out didn't work. Accuracy, reliability, and safe handling all were unacceptable. However, had the Textron entry actually *worked* well and been remotely cost effective (and I dont know what the cost estimates for it were), it almost certainly would have adopted over the Sig. (Note, I was really hoping the Textron would perform well, because ive been following it closely for 20 years from the very beginning of the LSAT program it came from.) The Sig met the program requirements and intents (which the other entries failed to do), and offered some additional advantages: 1. Most legacy 7.62x51mm weapons can likely be adapted to the new cartridge with little fanfair. Some with as little as a barrel change. 2. Aside from mating the stainless steel case head to the brass cartridge case to kake the hybrid cases, the Sig ammunition can be loaded on existing 7.62x51mm ammuntion lines.
@ostiariusalpha
@ostiariusalpha 26 дней назад
Textron's case-telescoped polymer ammo was brilliant, but floating chambers have had terrible shot spreads since they were first attempted back in the ACR program (both the Ares and Steyr guns used it). It was only recently that a physicist modelled how slight imperfections in initial alignment between the chamber and bore throat had exponential effects on point of impact, though it came along just as the Textron candidate was already miserably failing its accuracy requirements in the NGSW competition. Perhaps the fouling issues and alignment precision of floating chambers can still be corrected eventually, so the design hasn't lost all its promise; or alternate separate chamber designs might be explored, the G11's rotating chamber had good accuracy after all.
@Synthmilk
@Synthmilk Месяц назад
One major factor in the new systems is a dramatic reduction in exhaust gasses being blown into the soldiers face, which has been found to cause lung damage.
@chrisbrent7487
@chrisbrent7487 Месяц назад
And lead poisoning due to lead fulminate often being what is in primers.
@Synthmilk
@Synthmilk Месяц назад
I should add, that it is impossible to accomplish the same thing with the AR platform without fundamentally changing it, requiring at least a new upper receiver. Then you need a whole new lower to fit the larger 6.8 cartridge, which is needed in all cases, so it makes more sense to source a new rifle at that point.
@bigcraig79
@bigcraig79 26 дней назад
I knew breathing in that exhaust never could be good for you especially with heavy metals
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
@Synthmilk - What? Are you a faulty AI bot?
@Synthmilk
@Synthmilk 24 дня назад
@@jlam3927 no, why?
@WaukWarrior360
@WaukWarrior360 12 дней назад
Minor corrections: The STG-44 was not the first assault rifle and The M7 was Developed by SIG Saur USA
@davefellhoelter1343
@davefellhoelter1343 29 дней назад
sounds to "Me" like we went full circle back to a Heavy Ammo, Heavy Batle riffle, similar in weight and lenght to an M14 308 or all the way Back to PUNCHING Hard like 30/06? but for a Butt LOAD more money again. I smell Payola and the Military Industrial Machine Oligarchie? Once these three wars Get good and HOT they will cry for a harder hitting 30/06 again for the Next body armor. Just a Tax Payer here. I have watched vintage WWII AP 30/06 go smoking through 2" of steel or a 6" solid pour CMU wall at 250 yrds with my eyes.
@ianray8823
@ianray8823 Месяц назад
Garand Thumb did great videos on the new weapons
@mikeiso8963
@mikeiso8963 Месяц назад
I think this will go the route of the m14. Xm157 scope with xm7 is great for a DMR role. Lets hope I can buy one surplus in 10 yrs
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 29 дней назад
And, like the M14, you won't get a chance to buy one surplus. But, like the M14, you can buy a semiautomatic only version that (aside from the lower receiver not being able to accept a full auto trigger group) is identical, *right now* . Might be a bit longer before you can buy a true duplicate of the service load the Army is issuing with it.
@ostiariusalpha
@ostiariusalpha 26 дней назад
​@@geodkytYou can buy bimetal .277 Fury hunting cartridges right now that are 99% as high pressure as the military ammo. It's the steel-tipped EPR bullets that are hard to come by.
@Gridlocked
@Gridlocked 24 дня назад
Have you been able to buy an M4A1? No? So then why are you under the impression that you'll be able to buy a surplus in the future?
@mikeiso8963
@mikeiso8963 23 дня назад
@@Gridlocked i said "hope" sweetheart calm your ovaries. I was being facetious but since i need to spell it out for you in detail i believe that the USA military pushed Nato to adopt a larger caliber battle rifle in the past and it failed pretty miserably leading the m14 to have a short lifecycle and the adoption of the m16 and ar pattern rifles. The XM7 is similar in many regards and i think it will be ditched when now that theres no fighting in afghanistan and the imaginary threat of body armor in a near peer conflict. The fact of that matter is small arms cause the least amount of casualties in large scale wars and we will again come to the realization that higher capacity intermediate calibers to fix the enemy in place to use artillery, drones and aircraft will lead to these things gathering dust in an armory somewhere.
@Gridlocked
@Gridlocked 23 дня назад
@@mikeiso8963 When the M14 was issued for combat, the average U.S. Army infantrymen couldn’t afford luxuries such as accurately engaging targets with optics, but that isn’t the case anymore, and hasn’t been for more than 2 decades now. The M7 is paired with an FCS, and a full powered round, which is something that U.S. Army planners had always wanted since the days of WW2. I don’t recall the U.S. military ever pushing NATO to adopt a specific larger caliber battle rifle, I do however recall, the U.S. military pushing for the adoption of a larger caliber cartridge, because as I’ve previously said, it’s something in particular that the U.S. Army and its planners had always wanted within their cards. The cartridge in question was 7.62 NATO, which is still in-use today, and many firearms that fire this particular round should also be able to fire the new round, 6.8, at some point in the future. The new round fired from the M7 doesn’t just penetrate body armor, it also penetrates material and objects that 5.56 would otherwise fail to penetrate. Firearms have and still inflict a very small percentage of casualties in any war, however that doesn’t mean that firearms will cease evolving. This is true for most war equipment, it will continue to evolve, regardless of the percentage of casualties that the war equipment in question inflicts on the opposing force.
@elaishh3533
@elaishh3533 24 дня назад
“This is my rifle, there are many like it, but this one is mine…”
@FunnyQuailMan
@FunnyQuailMan Месяц назад
M7 is a fantastic rifle all its own, but together with the M250 squad automatic rifle and, particularly, the M157 optic/fire control, it's just not fair how good this system is in the hands of American SOF & close combat soldiers, especially as utilized according to the tactical & operational doctrine developed specifically for & with this system.
@Anarchy_420
@Anarchy_420 Месяц назад
Please create a Vid about The Cypher Drone
@heath_deadgerpvp1161
@heath_deadgerpvp1161 Месяц назад
Cool MIC ad
@trancamortal
@trancamortal Месяц назад
You are misguiding with the data. It's not fair to compare M249's weight with 200 rounds to the new weapon's empty. No mention of the shabby cartridge and horrendous pressures, to the point that the Army isn't using it a all in peacetime
@galvinstanley3235
@galvinstanley3235 Месяц назад
In peace time they carry a Sig p320.
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
Never mind the actual real problem to begin with, being one of weight.. Let's just completely ignore the core issue and reason for the changes to begin with, then talk waffle about prototype weapons, that were absolute pieces of sh** and mix them up with the RM277 and XM250, when what is supposed to the the MCX Spear or XM7.. This channel tries sometimes and then seems to take an absence of leave, spitting out any old thing that sounds half believable.
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
@@galvinstanley3235 The SIG Sauer P320 is a modular semi-automatic pistol - A "Handgun" or Sidearm.
@galvinstanley3235
@galvinstanley3235 Месяц назад
@@mrhassell Yes,and it's used when being around people in a non threatening way.
@baddestmofoalive
@baddestmofoalive Месяц назад
@@mrhasselland occasionally an autonomous grenade
@danielnogrady9004
@danielnogrady9004 28 дней назад
Sweet Rifle!
@rickjames18
@rickjames18 28 дней назад
M250 is my favorite for sure as an ex-Saw gunner at one point. Lighter, hits harder, and longer range with the same cyclic rate or near. I mean, what's not to love. Side fact, I believe these are only going to infantry units or combat units and most likely specialized units first like Airborne, Rangers, etc.
@rdavidwebb
@rdavidwebb 18 дней назад
I need one of those
@NesconProductions
@NesconProductions 28 дней назад
Nice piece (with historical background..) here! Think it was a very wise choice by the US military to select the SIG Sauer submissions in Next Generation Squad Weapon program that was against some very futuristic competition. With an entirely new bigger bullet & high-tech sighting system to match it should significantly improve troops ability to engage targets, especially from a distance. The SIG Sauer weapons also seems (in testing, thus far..) to fare much better than the M4 & M249 when exposed to harsh conditions (& passes the dunk test). The built in fire-suppressor not only enhances accuracy but helps soldiers better maintain situational awareness (not have hearing seriously degraded..) and ability to better communicate with fellow troops (as mentioned) cannot be underestimated. Lower noise from firing reduces signature to enemies is another important bonus. Familiar construction of the SIG Sauer weapons to the M4 should also ease change over. Increased weight of these weapons & ammo. will mean less rounds carried but enhancements in firepower & accuracy evidently were more important considerations. Will be interesting how in a sense giving every soldier a 'sniper rifle' with less ammunition affects firing doctrine (M7 vs. using an M4) 🤔? See the new M7 more as slimmed down M14 than an upgraded M4. Should be mentioned these new battle rifles & LMG's will being fielded (mostly..) with lower powered/down-rated ammunition (135 gr vs. 140 gr) to preserve the barrel life of the weapons. The full changed, very high velocity rounds (assume will be reserved for troops in 'front-line' positions) increase barrel wear and recoil.
@peterweller8583
@peterweller8583 Месяц назад
About fricken time something was done.
@winstonjones7519
@winstonjones7519 Месяц назад
You got that right. 5.56 was underpowered from the start.
@sullathehutt7720
@sullathehutt7720 28 дней назад
​@@winstonjones7519 False. The M855 cartridge is/was the problem. Ignore the stupid Hague conventions and issue a jacketed soft-point. Or at LEAST issue a proper lead ball round like Mk. 262, Mk. 318, M193, ANYTHING other than the stupid SS109 projectile.
@winstonjones7519
@winstonjones7519 28 дней назад
@@sullathehutt7720 I never fired the M855 round. I got out of the Army when my unit was getting the new three found burst M16s. I did shoot M193 though, just on the range. Thanks for your input.
@user-rb1yf4he9q
@user-rb1yf4he9q 5 дней назад
Sure to see that for sale in every Georgia, Texas and Florida K mart. No ID needed.
@user-wx2tm6dn9e
@user-wx2tm6dn9e 16 дней назад
So, has the bayonet been discarded? I don't see a lug/stud for it on the rifle. And, the suppressor doesn't look like it will accommodate it. Or, is the bayonet a separate item not meant for use with the rifle?
@jimhamilton4074
@jimhamilton4074 17 дней назад
The.276 Penderson of 1923 gains new life as the .277 Fury! It took 101 years to come back to the same bullet/ ballistics that preceded the M1 Garand! My how the U. S. military advances!
@abigailsaoirsefinnegan
@abigailsaoirsefinnegan 24 дня назад
are they gravity fired like the P-320?
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
It's a DMR/sniper rifle and there is a reason why only one person is usually assigned a rifle like this.
@galvinstanley3235
@galvinstanley3235 Месяц назад
We need a new technology to defeat modern body armor.The bullet is going the way of the arrow.
@Likeaworm
@Likeaworm Месяц назад
Ray gun
@GuntherRommel
@GuntherRommel Месяц назад
I can't wait to see man-portable magnetic slug throwers. It's going to be *awesome*. And *terrifying*.
@dalehill6127
@dalehill6127 29 дней назад
Robots instead of humans. Not here yet, but coming.
@Tora1337
@Tora1337 28 дней назад
Phased plasma rifle in the 40 watt range?
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 28 дней назад
During my 15 years in the infantry we never wore body armour, and helmets only when parachuting. In a hot climate with a heavy pack to carry over rough terrain, body armour is impractical, and so are helmets when you are trying to save weight. If the enemy are wearing body armour and helmets, more fool them, and in jungle warfare engagements are usually at less than 50 metres.
@sameemas1723
@sameemas1723 28 дней назад
The best gun out there right now is the top secret Elite 2.0 Commander RD-6
@malcolmmcfarlane7565
@malcolmmcfarlane7565 27 дней назад
The ammunition lacks lethality.
@richarderickson8840
@richarderickson8840 Месяц назад
Sounds like the scope is the big game changer not so much the round or the platform.
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 29 дней назад
The round allows the new scope to be used to more of an advantage than if it were used with either 7.62x51mm or 5.56x45mm, because of the exterior ballistics. The primary reason for the new round is to defeat the body armor we expect near peer adversaries to be widely fielding over the next ten years. If new ammunition designs in either 5.56 or 7.62x51mm would defeat thst armor at the ranges the Army expects to be shooting them, they would have just done an ammo & optics program and skipped *a lot* of headaches.
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
Keep in mind you can battle zero a rifle and ring man size steel out to 300 meters without ranging or adjusting the reticle. So why so fancy, elaborate, battery powered and time consuming?
@johnhopkins6260
@johnhopkins6260 Месяц назад
vs. 7mm magnum? ("boat-tail"?)
@XRakkgruntX
@XRakkgruntX 27 дней назад
The bigger picture is this, urban combat is primarily the only areas to see consistent action. So- we developed a round that is a better performer than the 5.56, body armor is also developing at the same rate. The bigger picture is to stop the flow of 5.56 ammo (surplus) and cut off the supply chain to Americas favorite platform in 5.56. This will rapidly lead to a lot of folks with little ammo to train with and probably maintaining a private surplus of their own. The advantages of the better ballistics will be negligible due to advances in body armor. However the primary goal of the anti gun government will have been met with most folks having no clue about the long game, and we are losing it.
@roguemodel
@roguemodel 26 дней назад
NATO adopted the 5.56 to streamline competency and logistics. Now, they will move to the 277 Fury. That should take about 20 years.
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
This is the third try to replace the M16/M4. Don't hold your breath.
@kitsune2858
@kitsune2858 Месяц назад
having both the Sig45 and 9, and the smooth operation, however, ammo could be lacking
@galvinstanley3235
@galvinstanley3235 Месяц назад
It's probably open ended for new technology that's just for the military.
@badbob6689
@badbob6689 27 дней назад
No one caliber is optimal in all conditions. One caliber use means compromise. One caliber is driven by logistics. No simple answers here.
@imkeerock
@imkeerock Месяц назад
With the new scope and ammo and whatever else is attached to it, the XM7 will be at least 15 pounds. Then you have to carry extra ammo too. That's a lot of weight to lug around.
@francislutz8027
@francislutz8027 Месяц назад
You do realize full size battle rifles were a thing for dozens of wars right? Does it suck carrying a heavier rifle and ammostocks, hell yes. But it's easily worked through. Also, watch the video. The XM250 weighs 15lbs the machine gun. The carbine weighs like half thay
@Scorpio.1989
@Scorpio.1989 Месяц назад
8.38 pounds (Rifle) 1.4 pounds (loaded magazine x7 magazines = 9.8 pounds) 2.5 pounds (NGSW-FC optic) 1.46 pounds (Suppressor) 8.38 + 9.8 + 2.5 + 1.46 = 22.14 pounds
@nebojsanesic5326
@nebojsanesic5326 29 дней назад
They will need to issue robots with each one of them...to carry all that firepower.
@-Sierra117-
@-Sierra117- 29 дней назад
Contracts been on hold for awhile now
@ostiariusalpha
@ostiariusalpha 26 дней назад
No, it hasn't.
@jerryreynolds4731
@jerryreynolds4731 Месяц назад
The 6.8 is not much different than the 7mm-08 which has been around for years. The difference is the 6.8 uses a .277 diameter bullet and the 7mm is .284. Both are based on the 7.62 NATO or commonly known as .308 Winchester. How much will be spent on the development of this new round when a very similar was already in existence?????
@ostiariusalpha
@ostiariusalpha 26 дней назад
The caliber is not the innovative aspect of this new cartridge, it's the bimetal design, with a base made from MIMed stainless steel having a brass body pop-riveted into it. This allows the primer pocket to withstand _much_ higher operating pressures, while retaining the better gas seal that brass has.
@tonyvandermeirsch731
@tonyvandermeirsch731 23 дня назад
The 6,8 mm round was already developed by FN in the late 50’s as a NATO standard with FAL but the U.S. would not accept it even it was much better in the shootout and pushed NATO for the 5,56mm. It seems they were right all the time.😊
@valqueenofValhalla
@valqueenofValhalla 29 дней назад
the rifles are heavy, and they are not all their cracked dup to be I have shoot the 277 fury and it doesn't punch threw armor i have 556 and 308 that will and so dont armies, its more then just armor penetration that will require special ammo like it always does
@quietus13
@quietus13 11 дней назад
Did you shoot .277 fury or did you shoot 6.8x51?? They are dimensionally identical but .277 is all brass and loaded to much lower pressure and is commercially available. 6.8 has a hybrid brass case with steel head for higher pressure, and is loaded to an insane 80,000 PSI. .277 performs similarly to .308; a little less energy up close, but more energy at range. The 6.8 however is a whole different beast.
@efone3553
@efone3553 Месяц назад
After this rifle the next rifle will be a Lazer hybrid!!!
@martincolvill5453
@martincolvill5453 Месяц назад
What? No plasma rifle in the 40 watt range?
@dobrzpe
@dobrzpe Месяц назад
hey, only what you see pal!
@JACE_75
@JACE_75 Месяц назад
👏🏾
@wraith67
@wraith67 8 дней назад
Repeating the marketing guys' talking points. The military doesn't do like civilian AR owners do and slap on a bunch of Gucci add-ons. There will be minimal add-ons used. As far as drop in customizations (like with the new pistols) - the infantry isn't going to do all that. SOF can and does customize weapons...but they're not rigid like the regular army combat arms branches, so it's a capability that will never be used by 99% of the force. The fancy optics aren't likely to survive long the way that GI Joe handles their equipment (Joe can break a bowling ball). It's a heavy system and the optic adds even more weight. Pushing 11lbs for the rifle and optic isn't going to make anybody happy. Almost anything would be better than the 5.56mm, but when you're using penetrator tips, you're making little holes and you're going to get shoot-throughs. The M885A1 was supposed to help remedy the shoot-through issue by tumbling in 3" of tissue, it's a small enough round to tumble - that's not going to happen with the 6.8mm. As to defeating Russian and Chinese body armor - that's not been done by US forces yet, unless DT knows about a war nobody else is aware of yet. Another thing that isn't mentioned is that the round is going to run 80,000 PSI, which will damage the rifling twice as fast as the 5.56 did - aside from ruining the weapon in a hurry, stripping out the rifling is going to destroy the accuracy as well, and then it won't matter how fancy the optic is. Lastly - the suppressor has nothing to do with venting off gases, they drop the decibel level a little bit, it's very tacticool, but yet again more weight, more maintenance and something else that can fail.
@Exerillo
@Exerillo 28 дней назад
And the best part, you can buy one. Must live in America and must not be a felon.
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
Hey guess what? A .308 that is battle-zeroed can ring man sized steel targets out to 300 meters or more without ranging or moving the reticle. With no batteries or waiting for "software analysis" lol.
@wildbill9490
@wildbill9490 27 дней назад
They should’ve picked the lighter MCX Spear LT but chambered in .277 Wolverine (6.8x39mm) instead of 5.56 to replace the M4 with. The XM7 would be better as a DMR than a service rifle.
@Gridlocked
@Gridlocked 24 дня назад
What you're asking for is literally the M7.
@wildbill9490
@wildbill9490 24 дня назад
@@Gridlocked no, I’m talking about the smaller .277 Wolverine that fits into 5.56 magazines, not the .277 Fury that fits into 7.62 magazines.
@captdread2013
@captdread2013 Месяц назад
I came here to meal team six this, but then I did a little research. You can geat one from Bear Creek for less than a grand or build one for around $600-700. High end carbines cost aroun$3,500. It uses .308 mags and the ammo is anywhere from $2-4.50 per round. If you already have a dpms lower you can get a complete upper for around $400. Not a bad option, really. Edit- oops My bad. I wrote about 8.6 and then I realized the rifle is 6.8.There goes that dyslexia again. I have no opinion on 6.8. It's fine, whatever.
@mmancino1982
@mmancino1982 Месяц назад
😂
@captdread2013
@captdread2013 Месяц назад
@@mmancino1982 Thank you. I meant well.😀
@kameronjones7139
@kameronjones7139 Месяц назад
Brother are you ok 😂
@YouTube_user3333
@YouTube_user3333 Месяц назад
I come to the comment section, just to find these types of extra info. Cheers
@FerNando-ys5hc
@FerNando-ys5hc 24 дня назад
They should also include nxt gen. gren.launchr that can blast within 10-20 m
@cellardoor7108
@cellardoor7108 29 дней назад
You didn’t even talk about the optics
@mtms42000
@mtms42000 Месяц назад
Does not look low drag at all...
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
Might as well issue everyone M60s. The gun of Rambo.
@MichaelAussie05
@MichaelAussie05 Месяц назад
I wonder how reliable these weapons will be the AR15 has a history of being reliable. The extra range, penetration and optic systems seem like a good upgrade but the new weapons look heavy and longer I wonder how they will perform in close combat in urban situations the ar15 platform had a few really good close combat configurations. I wonder if the new platforms have similar modularity. I can see why the US decided to go for these weapons systems but I wonder how they will perform over time, be really interesting to see in about 10 years time. Cheers.
@dongerz666
@dongerz666 Месяц назад
Will it??
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 29 дней назад
The rifle has basically the same modularity as an M4, given that it *is* an AR15 derived rifle, albeit one using a different gas system (and one that has also proven very reliable for decades). Overall length is similar to the M4, when both are similarly configured - *with a suppressor mounted* , the M7 is shorter than an M16A1... without a suppressor, it's 35" long overall (a whopping 2" more than the M4). As for the extra weight, well that was unavoidable if they wanted to get the ballistic performance the Army mandated as minimum. Given the choice between a lighter weapons that simply *cannot* do the jobs the Army thinks will be necessary for this rifle to do, and a rifle that is *still lighter* than the rifles American infantrymen traditionally carried until the M16, it's a no-brainer. While an extra *less than a pound of weight over an empty M16A2* (without the suppressor - and given the advantage the suppressor *adds* just in terms of C³ and SA, we would be adding suppressors to M4s as standard anyway before long) sucks to carry, you know what sucks even more to carry? *ANY* rifle that simply can't take out the enemy, because the round lacks the performance to defeat the armor worn by enemy line infantry.
@BenTLH
@BenTLH Месяц назад
I've got an idea. Why don't they just design a modern rifle and carbine but chambered for the old but full-powered 7.62mm NATO round which has more than enough power to punch through enemy body armor?
@davidhudson5452
@davidhudson5452 Месяц назад
What and not spend a tillion dollars never
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 29 дней назад
Because the Army had already determined that no new loading of the 7.62x51mm cartridge could meet the terminal performance requirements they needed. The ballistic testing showed them that a *particular* bullet design, in 6.8mm, at a specific minimum velocity (3000+ fps), *would* meet the required performance minimums. If the Army *could* have met the requirements with any 7.62x51mm loading that *wouldn't* blow up legacy 7.62x51mm weapons, they'd have done *that* , because they could have fielded it faster, cheaper, with less political oversight, and with *far* lighter logistics headaches.
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
@@geodkyt Put that optic on an AR-10 and you've basically got negligible differences.
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
@BenTLH - You just got demoted to Private.
@carlbecklehimer1898
@carlbecklehimer1898 Месяц назад
They forgot about weight. The rifle is great. The cartridge is probably not the best for infantry use though.
@francislutz8027
@francislutz8027 Месяц назад
Why? US soldiers in history with .30 and larger full size and battle rifles of the past had little problem. Quit being a wimp
@FrankOdonnell-ej3hd
@FrankOdonnell-ej3hd Месяц назад
but will it still work if u drop it in mud⚛😀
@perlundqvist7612
@perlundqvist7612 27 дней назад
If USA deside that this is the rifle they shall have! Do the other NATO members have to change to? When it comes changing calibre?
@mr.martyr8573
@mr.martyr8573 26 дней назад
My lord was that XM8 terrible. Lol
@TheGrimFoot
@TheGrimFoot 29 дней назад
Its not a sniper rifle. It's a standard service rifle. The new sniper rifles will be chambered in .338 norma
@NoahBranch503
@NoahBranch503 4 дня назад
6mm with straight case 350 legend which is called 6max is crazy numbers but 6.8 special has been around for a while tactical rifleman talks about having need for ar 47 thats a ar15/m4 that takes ak47/74 mags or 7.62x39 mags rock river arms makes one and thats really cool kinda rings macv sog its always the red tape politicians that jam up real progress for the ones fighting the fight but the M7 i guess is a step in the right direction 😂
@jyy9624
@jyy9624 Месяц назад
I thought Russian/Chinese/N Korean/Iranian armor is bogus but i guess some elite units also need to be defeated
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
The research, is missing with this one.
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 28 дней назад
!,800 metres? What soldier could hit a large man standing stock still in the open at 1,800 metres? Most soldiers would be hard pressed to hit such a target at 600 metres, never mind three times that range, and how often are you going to get a large man standing upright in the open for more than a second or two in a battle zone? Magic hi-tech sights might enable your average soldier to hit such a target 9 times out of ten at 600, but he might serve twenty years in the infantry without getting such a shot, and as for a man at 1,800 metres making erratic,unpredictable movements, forget it, any hit on such a target would be pure luck. So you have a rifle designed to hit a fantasy target you will never have to shoot at!
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
Right, you don't need that many snipers. What about urban and jungle combat?
@bernardedwards8461
@bernardedwards8461 24 дня назад
@@jlam3927 For jungle warfare you dont need a high standard of marksmanship, because most contacts are fairly close range and you can seldom see more than about 60 metres, usually less. Urban warfare is a combination of short ramge combats and long or medium range, where good marksmanship might be important, but you would seldom get targets at more than 300 metres.
@billalumni7760
@billalumni7760 Месяц назад
Are these weapons better, undoubtedly but only marginally.
@rayrae1651
@rayrae1651 23 дня назад
Russia’s bulletproof vest are a joke! Don’t get water on them because they dissolve😂
@TheRealSpek
@TheRealSpek 11 дней назад
Huh?? 6.8 effective range of 1800 meters???
@auro1986
@auro1986 Месяц назад
alloys are getting expensive. more gunpowder or whatever new formula in bullet will make it louder, for which your hired goon may become dead if ear plugs don't work
@TROOPERfarcry
@TROOPERfarcry 29 дней назад
It's puzzling that the US Army tried to get a rifle with "more power" since the 1980s, but nearly every proposal -- _if not _*_every_*_ proposal_ -- was built around the same cartridge. Now I'm not bashing the 5.56, maybe it needs to be replaced, maybe it doesn't, but trying to "boost-the-power" of a rifle while using the same ammo seems both simple and impossible -- _just make the barrel longer._ And if that's not possible, then there's no "boosting-of-power" that can occur. But instead they'd bring out some new rifle with the same cartridge and the same length-of-barrel, and then say "... hmmmm.... maybe... no, nevermind." Why even bother to have a trial if the proposed replacement doesn't address the core point of "more-power" to begin with?
@ostiariusalpha
@ostiariusalpha 26 дней назад
If you want more power through increased velocity, you can either make the barrel longer or increase the operating pressure of the cartridge. The XM7 and its 6.8x51mm ammo opt for the latter option.
@xusmico187
@xusmico187 Месяц назад
ok why? the optic is >10k
@jlam3927
@jlam3927 24 дня назад
First rule military spending. Spend.
@taxpayer239
@taxpayer239 26 дней назад
Yeah , probably 15 thousand dollars a round.
@ecleveland1
@ecleveland1 18 дней назад
The new rifle weighs more and is longer than the M4. And the soldier will carry less ammunition than he does with the M4. The combat weapon is devolving not evolving. We are going backwards not forwards. Might as well be using the M-14 or the M1 Garand. And the sighting system is too involved and way too expensive. This weapon was designed to fight in the mountains of Afghanistan. Why do we always keep fighting the last war we were in and not just providing our soldiers with a variety of weapons that can be chosen for the battlefield they are fighting in?
@user-hq3cv3fn7w
@user-hq3cv3fn7w Месяц назад
Old as time argument. I dont believe it matters at this time. Until counter drone measures can become more effective The size of the round, the speed, the knock down. It doesnt matter. We really havent seen drone swarms at their full combat capability. One on one mano mano, Awesome, That's not the reality of the battlefield today mano e roboto/mano
@paladro
@paladro Месяц назад
EW and sufficient air defense are the counters, but yes, drone use isn't going anywhere.
@thekraken1173
@thekraken1173 Месяц назад
Comparing the apple to salmon
@galvinstanley3235
@galvinstanley3235 Месяц назад
​@@paladroWalking drones with thermal,will probably be useful for looking for enemies in buildings.
@oceanhome2023
@oceanhome2023 Месяц назад
Separate Issue !!
@user-hq3cv3fn7w
@user-hq3cv3fn7w Месяц назад
Im speaking in regards to round changes making a difference now. Understand for rifle to rifle for use in modern battlefield operations. The individual infantryman single worst enemy is not the other infantry but still remains arty and now the ever present drone
@Vivendocadadia
@Vivendocadadia Месяц назад
Peace! No war!
@Phoenix-vg8li
@Phoenix-vg8li Месяц назад
Deterrence. Speak softly but carry a big stick
@thekraken1173
@thekraken1173 Месяц назад
World: Ok we are dismantling our armies now
@user-og1ux8nr3i
@user-og1ux8nr3i Месяц назад
Great idea but totally not possible.
@kameronjones7139
@kameronjones7139 Месяц назад
Peace through superior firepower
@cohort075
@cohort075 28 дней назад
@@kameronjones7139 Damn! You took my thunder mate!
@dhm7815
@dhm7815 Месяц назад
AI generated text. Very repetitive. A real human has to read and edit down what AI suggests. AI is indeed the writer but you have to be its editor in chief. Thumbs down.
@hardheadjarhead
@hardheadjarhead 23 дня назад
No, it’s not an A.I. generated voice. This guy has been doing this for year,and his channel pre-dates any sophisticated AI like that. In fact, he used to read it waaaay too fast. He’s learned how to slow down his voice a little bit so he can be understood. Like William Spaniel and others on other channels, has an awkward, nerdy rhythm to his voice…but it isn’t A.I. Hell, I know people who talk like that in day-to-day conversation! There’s going to be a point within the next few years where you’re simply not going to be able to tell whether it’s AI generated or not. If you’re willing to pay for the software, we are actually AT that point with simple uninflected narrations. There may be a day when we wish that they did use AI. But don’t crack on folks who try their best and simply don’t have golden tonsils or mellifluous tones.
@captainscarlett1
@captainscarlett1 Месяц назад
The ideal rifle/cartridge is a matter of context. Like a screwdriver a rifle is a tool, sometimes you need a big one sometimes you need a small one. There's no magic just an affordable and balanced compromise. Nothing new or innovative here.
@MRsolidcolor
@MRsolidcolor Месяц назад
556 in the right ammo and barrel length.. it really cant be beat..
@mgronich948
@mgronich948 Месяц назад
China's robo-dogs with assault rifles on their back has gotten a lot of press recently. The cost is reported to vary between ~$3000 and 75K. But at the low end, an infantry platoon could have a dozen airborne drones as well as a dozen robo-dogs. If you add robots that can swap batteries and reload the guns and perhaps also carry RF equipment to extend the range soldiers can command and control the robots, these weapons can make a lot more difference than a better gun.
@-Sierra117-
@-Sierra117- 29 дней назад
No they dont
@jakerivets2249
@jakerivets2249 Месяц назад
Heckler and COKE
@lazynow1
@lazynow1 27 дней назад
C-O-C-K
@nickbrockelman
@nickbrockelman Месяц назад
You keep saying XM 250 provides increased performance range in lethality yet it specs are almost identical to the 249 and even still it's specs are lower than the 249 in range and cyclical fire rate. My question is considering the specs of the XM 250 are lower than the specs of the 249 how does it provide increased lethality and increased performance?
@nicholasthomas4382
@nicholasthomas4382 Месяц назад
Those numbers are not accurate. The 6.8 bullet is larger, more than twice as heavy, and even in the low-pressure commercial loading match or beat the velocity of 5.56 from the same barrel length. Considering the design pressure of the military round, it will prob reach 3500-4000 fps from the machine gun.
@celmer6
@celmer6 Месяц назад
That's M240B not M249 SAW.
@kameronjones7139
@kameronjones7139 Месяц назад
The m250 100 percent has better range and is lighter the m249 saw by several pounds
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
SIG Sauer XM250 uses the .277 Fury cartridge, which is more effective and lethal. Lighter weight (approximately 14.5 pounds with bipod and suppressor), tested during a 27-month evaluation process by the U.S. Army and Marines. M249 SAW in service since 1984 as a lightweight alternative to the heavier M60 machine gun, has shown its age with advancements in body armor technology. 5.56mm NATO rounds are less effective against modern body armor. Weighs about 22 pounds loaded whereas the XM250 is 4 pounds lighter than the M249.
@celmer6
@celmer6 Месяц назад
277 Fury is experimental ammunition and it's not Standard for any of our allies in NATO or the UN. 277 Fury Armor Piercing ammo is $23 per round. This is a bullshit boondoggle weapons program and we're paying for it. This is Loser bullshit!
@johns5826
@johns5826 Месяц назад
Apples versus Oranges. If you are going to compare the M249 versus the XM250, and brag about the 4lbs saved, I’m good with that. However, when you compare the 600 round loadout of the M249, let’s be honest and NOT reduce the loadout of the XM250 to only 400 rounds. Not only does 400 rounds for the XM250 weigh in at 1 lb more, adding 200 rounds for parity increases the weight another 13.4lbs, for a total of 14.4 lbs more in ammo, or roughly, the XM250 is 10 lbs more than with the standard loadout than the M249.
@samuelnavarro8044
@samuelnavarro8044 28 дней назад
Go to the gym, twig.
@watchmestress4182
@watchmestress4182 25 дней назад
I want to love this but I just see an overpriced AR10 if Im being honest. BTW there is no way that has an effect range of 1800 meters, 338 Lapua is 1750 meters
@Hellfox777
@Hellfox777 Месяц назад
I still thunk they should've went with the Textron version.
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 29 дней назад
Other than the fact it didn't actually work in testing. Poor accuracy, reliability, and had excessively complicated safe handling procedures. I was really hoping Textron had worked the bugs out of their LSAT LMG & carbine (that being what they offered), because I've been following LSAT with interest for 20 years. Sadly, they just aren't "ready for prime time".
@TheOriginalFaxon
@TheOriginalFaxon Месяц назад
Okay, a few things. First, you pronounced Sig Sauer wrong, it's not Zig Zauer, it's Sig Sauer lmfao. Second, nobody calls the US company Sig Sauer, that's Sig Sauer GMBH. Sig USA brands themselves as just Sig on all their products here, and Sig USA is the specific subsidiary of the new USA based Sig Sauer subsidiary of the original Sig Sauer GMBH. I know it sounds confusing, but it's important to note because the german company also still develops weapons for European states as well, and the weapons they sell are different, think the Sig 550 through 556 which are still in current use by several european militaries, which are essentially ultra-gucci'd up AKs when you look at the internal action, just with different ammo out of non-AK mags. Sig USA is the one developing this rifle, the XM7, formerly XM5. These different companies operate fairly autonomously as well, so it's kind of important of a distinction to make clear.
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
That is just one of the many factual inaccuracies being made in this video. There are so many, it would take half a day to point them all out, which is what this guy should have been doing, before he released this crock-o-sh** half baked, half imagined, nonsensical misdirection.
@efone3553
@efone3553 Месяц назад
His videos are often laden with inaccuracies. I honestly think this maybe a foreigner using a voice AI.
@paktahn
@paktahn Месяц назад
@@efone3553 nah its not ai who ever runs this and other related dark channels hired a professional narrator that is blind to narrate their badly researched vids that are always full of errors i think you are right about them being foreign though probably chinese since many vids they do read like chinese propaganda
@Gridlocked
@Gridlocked 24 дня назад
Sig Sauer GMBH is the German branch and is practically defunct, the original Sig Sauer branch that started Sig USA was the Swiss branch.
@keything8487
@keything8487 Месяц назад
so its a 270 win mag?
@thekraken1173
@thekraken1173 Месяц назад
270 win mag doesn’t have a higher chamber pressure then M1 Abrams. This does.
@TraderDan58
@TraderDan58 Месяц назад
Close but they had to tinker with it a little bit so they could justify the billions spent on R&D. Can’t do the smart thing and use a cartridge that’s tried and true. No money in that.
@keything8487
@keything8487 Месяц назад
@@thekraken1173 was not aware of that.....hence the long distance and velocity power.
@keything8487
@keything8487 Месяц назад
@@TraderDan58 does this "new" cartridge beat 308?
@kameronjones7139
@kameronjones7139 Месяц назад
​@keything8487 yes
@RimfireAddicted70
@RimfireAddicted70 29 дней назад
Zig Zuaer lol
@vernonthompson3060
@vernonthompson3060 27 дней назад
I doubt very much this rifle replaces the M4. You double the weight & halve the actual number of rounds in an average soldiers load out. It's gonna go the way of the M14 I predict. It's an awesome rifle that fires a novel EXTREMELY expensive round that will only be fired in combat. All quals & training will be done using the training ammo which isn't even remotely the same. Those optics are like 12 grand & your lookin at about 6 to 8 grand for the rifle & suppressor. Like what??? An M4 cost the government $500 & .556 is Nato standard & that standard exists so every Nato country can resupply allies efficiently. The only ppl in the world who have body armor that this 6.8 furry was designed to defeat is what we can buy as citizens here. The Russian & Chinese aren't running level 4 body armor....
@Gridlocked
@Gridlocked 24 дня назад
You should really familiarize yourself with how government contracts work, and you don't know what the Chinese and Russian armed forces are using for their infantrymen.
@lancekilkenny721
@lancekilkenny721 Месяц назад
This rifle will NEVER be standard issue. If it somehow is, God help our infrintry units.
@Scorpio.1989
@Scorpio.1989 Месяц назад
It’s already being issued out…
@dobrzpe
@dobrzpe Месяц назад
@@Scorpio.1989 yea? just like the SCAR's were too, huh? or "every marine is going to get a suppressor"? LOL. this should NEVER be a standard issue weapon system.
@Gridlocked
@Gridlocked 24 дня назад
@@dobrzpe 101st are one of the first to be issued.
@dobrzpe
@dobrzpe 23 дня назад
@@Gridlocked lets wait until EVERYONE in the 101st has one... this thing is NOT going to be wide spread. it just *can't* be!
@cnknguyen
@cnknguyen Месяц назад
Suppressors absolutely DO NOT reduce gassing at the shooter lol.
@MRsolidcolor
@MRsolidcolor Месяц назад
nope. increases unless you get a flow can. and only a couple places do it well
@cnknguyen
@cnknguyen Месяц назад
@MRsolidcolor yea I may or may not have a couple, the stinging watering eyes is always fun after a run.
@Scorpio.1989
@Scorpio.1989 Месяц назад
@@MRsolidcolorthe new standard issue suppressors are flow through supressors
@geodkyt
@geodkyt 29 дней назад
These suppressors were explicitly specced and designed to reduce gas blowback dramatically over a conventional suppressor. Given these two guns are intended to mount the suppressor as the standard configuration (not just " special occasions), that's important. Between the operating system and the flow through suppressor, gas blowback when suppressed is *less* than a standard M4 fired unsuppressed.
@sullathehutt7720
@sullathehutt7720 28 дней назад
​@@geodkyt Well I would hope so. It's a piston gun. The M4 is a gas impingement system. What you lose in gas return, you more than gain in recoil from that heavy ass action flying back and forth.
@ejd7881
@ejd7881 26 дней назад
it's bull shit the green tip goes through pretty much anything
@CheekRunner
@CheekRunner 20 дней назад
Trash rod
@skraggybones
@skraggybones Месяц назад
The XM7 is not more accurate than the M4 and it's ability to penetrate body armor has nothing to do with the rifle, it's the round it's shooting. And the standard round for the XM7 will not penetrate body armor. It is a big step backwards, and will lead to a similar fiasco as the M14 in Vietnam.
@S0ulinth3machin3
@S0ulinth3machin3 Месяц назад
I dunno how much choices in small arms is going to matter in the era of drone warfare.
@MRsolidcolor
@MRsolidcolor Месяц назад
boots on the ground are always going to a thing. things change but men on the ground never gonna go. men can carry things to take out drones. we are just starting the drone race
@S0ulinth3machin3
@S0ulinth3machin3 Месяц назад
@@MRsolidcolor I agree, boots on the ground are going to be a thing for the foreseeable future. I'm talking about the difference in choice of assault rifle, not talking about people. In the current drone warfare, the drone pilots have to be near the front. I doubt if it matters much which assault rifle they're using.
@DCresident123
@DCresident123 28 дней назад
Another channel just making propaganda huh
@trap4dafu2k0fit
@trap4dafu2k0fit 27 дней назад
Gay ai voice
@petehafner3844
@petehafner3844 Месяц назад
Scar 17s
@mmancino1982
@mmancino1982 Месяц назад
Gross
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
The FN SCAR is gas-operated, short-stroke gas piston, automatic rifle developed by Belgian FN Herstal (FN) in 2004. 7.62 x 51mm - weight.. the problem exactly.
@marcusaetius9309
@marcusaetius9309 Месяц назад
SIG does make excellent weapons but a weapon is only as good as the person using it. If the soldier has two moms then chances are that no weapon is going to help them….
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
Intresting point worth a mention. Anyone using a rifle or sidearm, is bound by ammunition, range, line of sight, external forces and factors. In close quarters combat, there isn't much that can exceed the might of a good knife and the skill to use it. There's a saying however, don't take a knife to a gunfight. Unless you plan on using strategy to your advantage, in which case a decent steel cases writing pen, can be equally as lethal. Its not the weapon that does the work, its the operator.
Далее