Sheikh ul islam, Abu Bakr Al Baghdadi Al Husseini Al Qurayshi (Rahimahullaah) was the scholar who did the most for the Muslim ummah and Islam in our times. He united the Muslims and defended the ummah from the enemies of Islam and revived the Khilafah
I believe alot of people have misconceptions on the salafi/sunni movement. Basic principles is to follow the first three generations in aqeedah, rulings and thought. I would like to have a peaceful discussion to educate my mind and clear doubts and Allah knows best.
@@areez22 Bismillah. Before i start, anything good i say is from Allah and anything incorrect and wrong is from me and shaytan. The mutazila are a pure rationalistic movement which orginated in iraq. Everything has to be decided rationally and this caused problems as it went against traditional islamic teachings. I.e the mutazila opinion on the Quran, good or bad etc. The salafi/sunni opinion is that within islamic matters, thought and teachings should come from the Quran and sunnah from the first three generations of islam (salaf), as these generations were the best and there is a hadith to this. The mutazila is about ones opinions and what he thinks, this actually has no traditional islamic backing and is very dangerous as it opens up independant interpretation which can cause many problems.
@@MrRK0121 only salafis are ahle sunnah jammah ashabul hadith.. >>Regarding the Victorious Group Imaam al-Bukhaaree (d.256H) said in the explanation of the Hadeeth which mentions At-Taif Al Mansoorah:” ….(it) means “Ahlul Hadeeth…” (Mas’alatul Ihtijaaj Bishaf’ee Lil Khateeb Page 47 and Authentic Chain, Al Hujjatu Fee Bayaanul Muhajja 1/246) 2)Abdullah Bin Mubaarak (d.151H) said,According to me, they are “As-haabul-Hadeeth” (the Followers of Hadeeth).[Sharaf As-haabul-Hadeeth] of al-Khateebal-Baghdaadee (d.468H) 3) Imam Ahmad Bin Hanbal (241 H) said about the Victorious Group: “if the Victorious Group are not the“ Ashaabul Hadeeth” then I don’t know who are they ”(Ma’rifatu Uloom Ul Hadeeth Lil Haakim pg 2, Fath ul Baari 13/250. And Also Imam Ahmed said “According to us, Ahlul hadeeth is a person that Acts upon a hadeeth” [Manaaqib Al-Imam Ahmed Li Ibn Al Jawzi Pg 208 with Authentic Chain] 4)Ibn Muflih (763 H) said:“Ahul Hadeeth, they are the Victorious Group, established upon the Haqq (Absolute truth)” (Al Adaab Ul Shar’rah 1/211) 5)Imam Sufyaan Thawri (d.161H)rahimuallah about Ahlul Hadith, he said, “Angels are the guardians of the heavens and “Ashabul Hadith” are the guardians of the earth”. [Sharaf As-habul Hadith] 6)Imam Shaf’ee (204 H) Said:“Whenever I see a person from the Ashaabul Hadeeth (People of Hadeeth), then it is as if I have seen the Prophet Sallahu Alehi Wassallam “Alive” (Sharfu Ashaab Ul Hadeeth Lil Khateeb Pg.94, Authentic Chain…. and Also Imaam Ash-Shaafi’ee (d.204AH) said:”Stick to the Ahlul-Hadeeth, since they are the most correct of the people” ( As -Siyaar 14/197) and Also Abu Naeem Mal Asbahani (430 H) Said: “And Ash-Sha’fee was upon the Madhab of “Ahul Hadeeth” (Hulyatul Awliya 9/112) 7)Ali bin Abdullah Al Madeeni (234 H), who was the Teacher of Imam Bukhari, said:“They are the “Ahul Hadeeth” 8)Shaykh Abdul-Qaadir al-Jeelaanee(d.561H) said,As for al-Firqatun- Naajiyah (the Saved-Sect) it is Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaaah, and there is no name for Ahlus- Sunnah except one - and that is As-haabul-Hadeeth (thePeople of Hadeeth). Al-Ghuniyatut-Taalibeen (p. 212) 9) Khateeb Baghdadi (463 H) has written a Book on the Virtues of the Ahlul Hadeeth, titled:Sharf Ashaab al-Hadeeth, and also Check Tareekh ul Baghdad 1/224 10)Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyah (d.728Ah)said:Hence it is clear that the people who most deserve to be called the victorious group are “Ahl al- Hadeeth wa’l-Sunnah”, who have no leader to follow blindly apart from the Messenger of Allah (peace andblessings of Allah be upon him). They are the most knowledgeable of people concerning his words and deeds,the most able to distinguish between what is sound and what is not [of hadeeth]. Their imams have deep knowledge of that, they are the ones who understand its meanings and are the most sincere in following it.They accept it and believe in it, and act upon it. They show love to those who adopt it and they show enmity to those who oppose it. They are the ones who measure any idea against that which is proven in the Qur’an and Sunnah, so they never adopt any idea and make it one of the basic principles of their religion unless it is proven in that which the Messenger brought. Rather they make that which the Messenger brought,the Qur’an and Sunnah, the foundation and basis of their beliefs. With regard to the issues concerning which people dispute, such as the attributes of Allah, the divine decree, the threat of Hell, the names of Allah and the principle of enjoining what is good and forbidding what is evil, etc., they refer that to Allah and His Messenger. They examine the general ideas concerning which the different groups dispute, and whatever of these ideas is in accordance with the Qur’an and Sunnah, they approve of it, and whatevergoes against the Qur’an and Sunnah, they reject it.They do not follow conjecture or whims and desires. For following conjecture is ignorance and following whims and desires without any guidance from Allah is wrong doing. (Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 3/347, 348) And also Sheikh-Ibne Taymiyyah said “We do not take the meaning of Ahlul Hadeeth to just mean the people who heard (ahadeeth), wrote them or narrated them rather we mean anyone who takes care to memorize it, understand it and follow it, both inwardly and outwardly.”[Majmoo’ al-Fataawa, 4/95] ->>The explanation of Ibn Taymiyyah Rahimahullah proves that Ahlul hadeeth means 2 types of people: The Muhadditheen and their Awaam. 11) Surah Al-Isra 17:71 يَوۡمَ نَدۡعُوۡا كُلَّ اُنَاسٍۢ بِاِمَامِهِمۡۚ فَمَنۡ اُوۡتِىَ كِتٰبَهٗ بِيَمِيۡنِهٖ فَاُولٰۤٮِٕكَ يَقۡرَءُوۡنَ كِتٰبَهُمۡ وَلَا يُظۡلَمُوۡنَ فَتِيۡلًا “(And remember) the Day when We shall call together all human beings with their (respective) Imam [their Prophets, or their records of good and bad deeds, or their Holy Books like the Quran, the Taurat (Torah), the Injeel (Gospel), etc.]. So whosoever is given his record in his right hand, such will read their records, and they will not be dealt with unjustly in the least.” Ibn Katheer (774 H) said in the Tafseer of this Verse in his Most Famous Tafseer ibn Katheer: “And Some Salafs said: This (verse) is the Greatest honour for the Ashaabul Hadeeth because their Imaam is the Prophet MUHAMMAD Sallaho Alayhi Wassallam” Tafseer Ibn Katheer Surah Al-Isral Verse 71. Jalal Ud Deen Suyuti (911 H) recorded a Similar Tafseer of this Verse: “There is not a Greater honour than that (verse) for the Ashaabul Hadeeth because they Do Not Have an Imaam other than Him (Sal Allahu Alaihi Wasallam)”. (Tadreeb Ul Raawi 2/126, Noo’27) Finally ->> Ahlul hadeeth or Ahlus Sunnah are not only Muhadaseen, those who practice on the hadith are also included in them i.e.
Muslims do not worship the Kaba, or its contents, it is simply a focal point. Muslims worship One God, the Most Merciful, and the Most Wise. God decreed that when Muslims pray they all face one direction. It is a sign of unity that encapsulates the unity embedded in the religion of Islam. "We have certainly seen the turning of your face, [O Muhammad], toward the heaven, and We will surely turn you to a qiblah with which you will be pleased. So turn your face toward al-Masjid al-haram. And wherever you [believers] are, turn your faces toward it [in prayer]. Indeed, those who have been given the Scripture well know that it is the truth from their Lord. And Allah is not unaware of what they do". 2:144 "And from wheresoever you start forth (for prayers), turn your face in the direction of Al-Masjid-al-Haram (at Mecca), that is indeed the truth from your Lord. And God is not unaware of what you do.”2:149
@@pinoym371 but wahabbis claim the people who go to graves to do ziyarah, are grave worshippers because Wahabis are literalists and just agenda driven.
@@VMTNKKR it is a fact that some Muslim people due to ignorance from the right teaching of Islam or following blindly from their so-called maulana, asking things that dead people have in any way no ability to answer their invocation. going to the graves and praying for forgiveness for their sins to Allah for those occupants is not forbidden in Islam but as a matter of fact, this is one thing that the living can lend their help to them. and visiting the graves can also help the living to contemplate for themselves that one day they will also join these people so by that, it can help them set right whatever mistakes they have done in their lives.
6:30 So, one Shaykh says "He's not in the Earth" and the other says, " He's not within time and space". I don't see any disagreement here. May Allah guide us and unite us.
In the Quran (He is Allah in the heaven and the earth) meaning he is worshipped in the heavens and the earth. Not in the sense that Allah is actually in both. And Allah knows best.
+Abdulrahman G brother i dont know arabic language and you know more than me but i cant take your meaning and i dont which ayah does this mean . may be this meaning is same, but i have to concern the ulemas to whome i have trust, thanks
Hasan Arif But that’s not true my brother....At least not in this particular context. I actually usually agree that the term Athari is more accurate and proper than the term “Salafi” and ESPECIALLY “wahhabi” which is almost utterly meaningless and just a slur used against Hanbalis, Atharis & Salafis by revisionist sects, Shis rafidah snd Sufi’s
@@sufimuslimlion4114 it is funny that you follow Abu Hanifah, yet Abu Hanifah told us in Fiqh al Akbar that Allah has a hand bila kayfa just as the Atharis say.
@@faroqaf3085 actually both are enemy of Islam, wahhabism is sourced from Hanbali munafiqun, so please read about Islamic History, you will see it, almost all fitna-makers are disgusting hanbalis
@@LiberalDictate The hanabilah no doubt have been the most troublesome of the 4 madhabs, it is also the weakest of the madhahib, but we should know that there are many excellent Hanbali scholars of the part like Ibn Qudama etc, and that the Hanbali madhab has mostly been perverted, Ahmad Ibn Hanbal has been lied and slandered against many times. The Hanbali madhab really went downhill starting with Ibn Taymiyyah and onward, but I don't think it's fair to trash the madhab because I don't think it is what it used to be.
Though The World of Salafism is trying its best to Spread it's wings,yet their population is still >1% of entire muslim population !Alhamdulillah be with IJMA of the ummah...Taqleed of Either of the FOur :- Hanafi,Shafi'i,Hambali,Maliki Aqeedah :- Maturidi,Ashari Other than these all are deviants !
@@areez22 The Four madhabs are to be followed on the matters where Quran and Hadees have no clear evidence over ! Like Eating Prawns....If you are salafi ...than please prove it from Quran and Sunnah if One should eat it or not ! Other than these...if you directly wanna catch masael from Quran and Sunnah ... Search for the way of Namaz...you will find all the four types of Salah in Ahadees ! What will You Do ? Hundreds and TOns of Such Masael Arise ? in Such cases You need to follow One of the 4 Aimma ! Other than that 5 times prayer,Hajj,Zakat etc...are mandates ! So this is where you will directly follow Quran and Sunnah...in Taqleed you indirectly follow Quran and Sunnah WIth Ijma of Ummah and Understanding of the Salaf! Summing Up ! There is ijma over Taqleed of any of the four ! And the holy Prophet Told in a Sahih Hadith ! That Be with the Ijma...verily,Allah will never unite/gather/ijma my ummah over wrong or False !
@@THEUnicornhafezhamza what about Ibn Hazm? Sufyan al-Thawri? It is disrespectful to blindly follow one Madhhab. Nor did the scholars want that. Athari creed is the creed of four Aimmah.
I am a Christian myself and I bless you. I would like to know what for example would be a typical belief or idea of someone who is a wahabbi that is different to someone who is a salafi?.. And I know that this may sound silly but can both Shia and sunni be a sufi?. Can anyone tell me if they would please. Thanks Jamie
Islam patriots Ahly Sunnah wal jemaah practise following madzhab and Sufi tasawuf and Tauheed oneness asyaeri wal mayturidi and reject any wahabi salafi teachings which is near to shiea rafidh teachings
Narated by student of Abu Hanifah that he asked Abu Hanifah (what do you say if someone doesn't know Allah in the heaven or in the earth) Imam Abu Hanifah reply in summary (when you make du'aa, where do you raise your hand?) I have not confirmed the authenticity of this narration but it is used widely to prove that Allah is above the heavens "Samaa" and Allah knows best
+Abdulrahman G actually we raise our hands to the sky because it is the qiblah of duas, just like the kaaba is the qibla of the salat. We do not believe that Allah is located in the sky. God exists before the place, and he exists without a place after creating it
Also, why are you sharing something whose authenticity is not proved? Abu Ja`far At-Tahawi said: “God is clear of all boundaries, extremes, sides, organs, and instruments. The six directions do not contain God as is the case with all the created things.”
+Said Mortaza Zeewari The prophet SAAW said (have mercy on the one in earth, may the one in heaven have mercy on you) and he said (I am the treasurer of the one in heavens) and he said to the girl (where is Allah?) she replied (in the heaven) and Um salamah said proudly (The one in the heaven engaged me to the prophet). All authentic hadiths
Not only antropomorphism, but also the definition of 'Tawheed'. Salafi's follow the definition of Ibn Taymiyyah which divides it in 3 kinds of monotheïsm. Sunni's reject that definition. The founder of Salafism Muhammed Ibn Abdul Wahhab used this monotheïsm to apply takfier and accusing Sunni's of begetting 'shirk' (polytheÏsm).
Hi full moon sorry I am a Christian and I don't know too much about all this but I find it really interesting. You sound like you know what you are on about. Is wahabbi and salfi the same or if not what for example would a different belief be.
@@jamiegrieve5875 When we talk about Salafism we mean by that Wahhabism. It us the same with different names. Wahhabi's (or call them Salafis) call themselves Salafis because they claim they are the true followers of the so called 'salaf'. Salaf means preancestors. We call them Wahhabi's because the founder of their sect is called Muhammed ibn Abdul Wahhab.
The difference between Salaf and Khalaf was because Arabic was a communal obligation lacking - Arabic - The allegorical verses were simple to understand in Arabic but at the time of the Khalaf, no one was studying Arabic and until today we were relying upon poor translations.
Im a new muslim and i have a problems with these ideas about Allah! When people say Allah is above his throne does that mean he is stuck there and never moves? Like a statue?? And did the real salafi ra really concerntrate such efforts of the description of Allah is this really healhy for daily life and especially salah? I find that these ideas hinders my progress as somebody who just wants to gloryfy and worship Allah because im sure he exists isnt that acceptable enough in islam.... Thank you
Assalamualaikum Warahmatullahi Wabarakatuh, These problems that you are having regarding ideas about Allah stem from the fact that you are asking unnecessary questions that the salaf never asked, so please avoid asking these types of questions. Also, Allah is above the creation in a way that befits His majesty. We believe in this, and we do not question how Allah is above His creation since this goes against the teachings of the salaf. I highly recommend that you learn the basics of your belief system. Start with Books like: 1.Kitab at-tawheed 2.Thalaathat-ul-Usool: The Three Fundamental Principles 3. al-Qawl ul-Mufeed Fee Adillatit Tawheed by our brother Muhammad ibn ‘Abdul-Wahhaab al-Wasaabee
I also forgot to mention that asking unnecessary questions is one of the tricks of Shaytaan that can lead to doubts and confusion regarding the religion.
To be honest I was hoping to run away from these ideas about God/Allah physical aspects because of course these issues go just a little deeper in Christianity to support the doctrine, perhaps you can call this another Bridge between the two religions. Its just ashame that a lot of Muslims have accepted these ideas but are clearly oblivious to what this implies or where this is Leading. I understand that this concept may have a valid position in Islam but I'd prefur to safe guard myself and just concentrate on the 99 attributes of Allah which is what our holy Prophet Muhammad pbuh etc gave us. Praise be Allah they will measure the earth and all that is contained but they can never measure Allah!
@@hamzamedina146 Affirming the names and attributes of Allah is something we should never run away from because Allah himself has described himself with certain attributes such as hands, eyes, and more. You have to realize that we may share the same name with Allah when it comes to the attribute but the reality is different. For example, both Allah and his creation have hands but the hands of Allah is different from the hands of the human being. We do not say that the hand of Allah is like the hand of a human being. We do not question how these hands are and what they look like. The creed of Ahlus-Sunnah wal-Jamaa’ah in regard to Allaah’s Names and His Attributes is affriming that which Allaah has affirmed for himself from the Names and Attributes, without: 1. tahreef (changing/distorting a Name and/or Attribute of Allaah to other than its true meaning, i.e. from Allaah to al-Laat, and al-‘Azeez to al-‘Uzzah); 2. ta’teel (denying some or all of Allaah’s Names and Attributes); 3. takyeef (questioning as to “how” (Allaah’s Name or Attribute is), i.e. How does Allaah descend, etc.?); 4. tamtheel (to imply a similarity between Allaah’s Names and Attributes and that of His creation). Allah also mentioned in the Quran that there is nothing like him. We can never imagine how Allah looks like because he is beyond our comprehension and even if we tried to then we will get no where.
Wallahi this guy is talking how a Trinitarian Christian faces hard time explaining their nonsensical belief. Ashari & Mathuridism are Islamic version of Christian Trinitarian nonsense. Athari aka Salafi Aqida is simple, easy to understand and refer to a relatable God unlike the Ashari/Maturidi God who is abstract and indescribable.
if referring to God in so called 'bodily' terms is anthropomorphism (i don't know if this is the correct spelling of the word- but thats besides the point), than so is God hearing and seeing is anthropomorphism also, as human beings can also see and hear. If you say that our hearing and our seeing is not like the way God hears and sees, than it must also be the case, that the 'bodily' attributes of God must also be not like his creation. Why do our Ashari brothers find this confusing?
"Nothing is like Him, and *yet* He hears and sees all." That's how it is in the Qur'an: absolutely nothing is like Allah, and yet, He hears and sees. His hearing and seeing is therefor not like our hearing and sight. Obviously, our hearing and our sight depends on an apparatus; an ear, an eyeball, and these pick up vibrations and light from our surroundings. They are limited, and, perhaps most importantly, our hearing and seeing is a shared type of attribute. We share it with other human beings, and animals, etc. Allah's hearing and seeing is not like that. First of all, it's not in any way limited. It's not limited in space and time, light and dark, positions and locations, because it's not operating based on some apparatus like an eye or an ear. Eyes and ears are structures that consist of parts and portions coming together to form a unit, and these things are therefor bound to space; they have size, color, shapes: incidental characteristics, is what these are called. And all incidental characteristics are created. Allah is not constructed of parts and portions coming together, because that would mean He has a size and a shape, which means that these shapes have boundaries and limits, which means they exist in a spacial dimension, which means that they could be in any other given location, which means their positions require specification. What requires specification is a creation, by definition. Furthermore, Allah's attributes are unique in the sense that His attributes aren't a shared type of attribute. So while we have sight and hearing, like other created beings like angels, cats and ants, it's an attribute that is shared and created, while Allah's attributes are not created, nor does anything other than Him have attributes that are like His. It's not anthropomorphic to believe that Allah sees and hears. It would be anthropomorphic to claim that His seeing is due to a physical eyeball, or that His hearing is like ours. When you say that He has 'bodily' characteristics, and you mean by that, anything that has beginnings and endings, size, shape, location in space, etc., then you are in fact attributing to Allah an attribute that has a meaning that also applies to creatures. Adding to that statement, that "oh but it's unlike our bodies" doesn't do away with the problem that you create by saying it. It becomes a shared type of characteristic nonetheless. You're simply saying that His bodily attribute that you're referring to doesn't look like the human equivalent, so for example, His Yad (or hand) isn't five fingers and a palm, but something different. In your mind, it's still a hand, it just looks different from our hands. It's like saying that He has a color, but His color is unlike any color we have ever seen, and we can not imagine a new color that we haven't experienced, so His color must be like that. But even if the color can not be conjured up in the mind due to a lack of experiencing it, it would still be like any other color, it would still require an essence to exist in, and Allah is not an essence. A hand is restricted in size, it has a shape, it has these incidental characteristics, it has coordinates in a spacial dimension, it requires specification, if it moves, then its position now differs from the position it was in a moment ago, and the only way to distinguish between its different locations and positions is if there's a timeline present, and so the moving hand is bound to a timeline. You're putting Allah in space and time, locking Him up in His own creation, while He existed, as the hadith says, while nothing else existed. So He exists when there is no time and space, and so He is not bound to, or limited by that which wouldn't have even existed, had He not willed it into being (referring to space and time here). You understand brother? I reflected on these things very much as a child, and I basically reached pretty much the exact same conclusions as what I would later find in Ashari theological teachings. That is because it does make perfect sense, in my humble opinion. If you look at the jewish Bible, it's filled with anthropomorphic statements, and the christians will in fact interpret those literally, while in classical jewish theology, it's strictly forbidden to interpret those descriptions literally, because they know that doing so opens the door to major, major theological problems. Their explanation of these verses usually is that God is transcendend, and infinite, and common folk may find that idea to be an issue, as it distances them from their Lord. And so, to bridge that gap, to make theology available and close to people who aren't necessarily trained theologians, these anthropomorphic verses are there; so that it brings them near to God. But they are not meant to be taken literally. And claiming you don't take them literally, but insisting that Allah is a body, but just not like anything we know of, is still anthropomorphism, and therefor in fact blasphemous.
قال الإمام أحمد (من قال الله جسم لا كالأجسام كفر) رواه عن الإمام أحمد أبو محمد البغدادي صاحب الخصال من الحنابلة كما رواه عن أبي محمد الحافظ الفقيه الزركشي في كتابه "تشنيف المسامع" المجلد 4 ص 684 Imam Ahmad ibn Hanbal(ra) said: 'Whoever says Allah is a jism unlike any other jisms has commited Kufr!' Narrated by Imam Ahmad Abu Muhammad al Baghdadi in his book Al Khisal hanbali and from Abu Muhammad Alhafiz alfaqih al Zarkashi in his book Tashnif Al Masami' Volume 4 page 684. The above is similar to those who say, Allah has a literal hand unlike hands, literal fingers unlike fingers, literal face unlike faces and so on, and take on its apparent meaning(Dhahir Ma'na) قال عبد الواحد بن عبد العزيز بن الحارث التميمي في اعتقاد الإمام ابن حنبل: وأنكر على من يقول بالجسم وقال إن الأسماء مأخوذة بالشريعة واللغة وأهل اللغة وضعوا هذا الاسم على كل ذي طول وعرض وسمك وتركيب وصورة وتأليف والله تعالى خارج عن ذلك كله فلم يجز أن يسمى جسما لخروجه عن معنى الجسمية ولم يجىء في الشريعة. ص ٤٥ Abdul Wahid ibn Abdul Aziz ibn Hadith At tamimi in his I'tiqad of Imam Ahmad Ibn hanbal Ra mentioned.. "And he (Imam Ahmad) disapproved of anyone stating that Allah is a “jism”. And he would say, “Names of Allah are taken from the Sharee’ah and from the Arabic Language. The people of the Arabic Language coined that term for whatever has length, width, depth, composition, and form. And Allah the Exalted is free from all of that. So it is impermissible to call him a "jism", since He is free from what a "jism" means. Furthermore, it did not come in the Sharee’ah (so it is null and void)." Page 45 Ibn Qudamah rh mentions.. وما أشكل من ذلك وجب إثباته لفظا، وترك التعرض لمعناه ونرد علمه إلى قائله [لمعة الإعتقاد ج ١ ص ٦] "And whatever is ambiguous from these [verses referring to the Sifāt of Allāh], it is compulsory to affirm its words, to leave the seeking of its meaning and consign its knowledge to the One [Allāh] who said it." [Lum'at al-I'tiqād, 1/6] Here the Imām has very clearly stated that the affirmation of these Attributes of Allāh are upon their words and their meanings are consigned, which gives validity to the fact that wherever he says Dhāhir, his intent is the apparent words and not the apparent meaning. سفيان بن عيينة، يقول: كل ما وصف الله تعالى من نفسه في كتابه فتفسيره تلاوته، والسكوت عليه. Sufyan Ibn Uyaynah Ra says All that is mentioned in the Qur'an regards to the attributes from himself it's RECITATION it it's Tafsir and be SILENT upon it. - “Aqeedat As-Salaf Ashaab Al-Hadeeth” by As-Sabuni (p.68); “Al-Asmaa’ Wal Sifaat” by Al-Bayhaqi (2/158 & 307)
The issue is so many Muslims believe it is our Eyes that see, and our Ears that hear. But this is not true. All hearing and seeing happens within the mind. And Allah is the Supreme Mind.
@Yusuf Lewis Blind people also have eyes my brother! أَفَلَمْ يَسِيرُوا فِي الْأَرْضِ فَتَكُونَ لَهُمْ قُلُوبٌ يَعْقِلُونَ بِهَا أَوْ آذَانٌ يَسْمَعُونَ بِهَا ۖ فَإِنَّهَا لَا تَعْمَى الْأَبْصَارُ وَلَٰكِن تَعْمَى الْقُلُوبُ الَّتِي فِي الصُّدُورِ - 22:46 "So have they not traveled through the earth and have hearts by which to reason and ears by which to hear? For indeed, it is not eyes that are blinded, but blinded are the hearts which are within the breasts." (22:46)
Assalamu-alaikum. Do not understand. At this point, the Shaikh says that Allah is *not* transcendent. I thought that the whole point of our Aqeedah is that Allah (swt) transcends time and space . ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-n_6rJNTPVgs.html
The witch-hunt of salafi thought what is sectarian in nature. The need of hour is to recognize and give credit to the greatest teacher and Imam Mohammad ibne Abdullah ﷺ
That sir, I think is Yusuf an nabhani, the grandfather of Taqiudeen an nabhani and the father of Ismail an nabhani. He was a judge in the time of the Ottomans
He's talking about modern day and that school always suffered from people likening God to the creator. Imam ahmed and imam jawzi were on haq but some of the followers of the school were not. Like most of the najd followers today and ibn taymiyyah
@@AbdullahodSandzak may Allaah grant me and you rushd and hidaayah and forgive us of our sins. Please bring an example of an anthropomorphic statement from any salafee book and show us what you mean. Thank you.
@@claytonwest6873 My previous statement says who is to blame for these anthropomorphic statements. The najdi movement by ibn Abdul wahab al najdi And ibn taymiyyah. These people claim to follow the salaf, again , claim.as the shia claim to follow the Righteous and Beloved ahlul bayt of the prophet s.a.w But they lie and so do these new age followers of the najdi school Didn't you watch the video?! This is a scholar talking and giving you the information. Stick to the 4 schools as they are the authentic salaf schools available. If you want to learn a lot more on the topic listen to True hanbali creed vs ibn taymiyyah It's a series of lectures based on the said topic
@@AbdullahodSandzak then what about what those imaams had to say of the attributes of Allaah تعالى ? You, instead of going for what some scholars say about Ahmad's school, should read the book called Usool As Sunnah by Ahmad himself. Read Ahmad's essay called The Creed of Ahl As Sunnah Wal Jamaa'ah. Read what scholars such as ibn Hazm, ibn Al Mubaarak, Al Khateeb Al Baghdaadee, As Zuhree, going back to the Sahaabah, have to say of the attributes of Allaah. Who was the first to come with the figurative explanations of the Sifaat? Which hadeeth says to explain the Sifaat to mean other than it's apparent sense? Brother, I don't blame you or dislike you personally because I know we need to follow scholars and you've been influenced by a party from them. I just follow the scholars who point me to the Hadeeth and the understanding of the Sahaabah. I believe it's clear in the Qur'aan that we should not look past what those sources say. As Salaamu alaikum.
Furthermore, you didn't give an example from any book or statement from ones you mentioned. Please do this so you won't seem like you have resentment without a real reason.
God is in the Earth? Where does it say this? where is the Reference? 6:24 timestamp. Again even so called scholars just say things about the Creator ( Subhana wa ta Allah) with no source.
Few scholars are actually ashari. You asharis just lie bout them. Like how some claim Baghawi Khateeb baghdadi Ibn al jawzi And others were ashari to you He starts mentioning abu hanifa rahimahullah yet won't even actually mention his book fiqhal akbar and how it's extremely weak in attribution
Tell me what ibn Abdul Wahhaab or ibn Taymiyyah or ibn al Jawzee or ibn Hanbal or ibn al Mubaarak or al Bukhaaree were extreme in or anthropomorphic? Bring an example from any one of their works where they did tashbeeh. Of course this means you have to read it first... a challenge for any who condemned another based on the accusations of the third.
Check sheikh yasir al hanafi videos. Discussing the aqeeda of the modern neo salafies. Nor imam ahmad ra or bukhari ra had antropoformic aqeeda. But he gives evidence if the wahabi aqeeda starting with ibn taymiya ra
The people of Sunnah and Jama’ah (adherents to the prophetic way) believe that Allah is exalted above His creation because of the evidence of the Quran, Sunnah (prophetic traditions), consensus of the scholars, common sense and man’s innate instinct (fitrah). (1) The Quran describes the "exaltedness" or "highness" of Allah in different ways, as His being high and above, and by describing how things come down from Him, and go up to Him, and by stating that He is above heaven. For example (interpretations of the meaning): (Highness): "… and He is the Most High, the Most Great." [2:255] "Glorify the Name of your Lord, the Most High." [87:1] (Above): "And He is the Irresistible, above His slaves …" [6:18] "They fear their Lord above them, and they do what they are commanded." [16:50] (Things coming down from Him): "He arranges (every) affair from the heavens to the earth … " [32:5] "Verily We: it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e., the Quran) …" [15:9] (Things going up to Him): "… To Him ascend (all) the goodly words, and the righteous deeds exalt it …" [35:10] "The angels and the Rooh (Jibreel) ascend to Him …" [70:4] (Allah is above heaven): "Do you feel secure that He, Who is over the heaven, will not cause the earth to sink with you …?" [67:16] (2) The Sunnah: Many reports were narrated "mutawatir" (i.e. with a large number of narrators at every stage of the isnad/chain, such that it is impossible for them all to have agreed on a lie) from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), describing his words and deeds and things of which he approved. For example, he used to say "Subhana Rabbi al-A’la (Glory be to my Lord Most High)" in sujood (prostration), and in some ahadeeth (reports) he is reported to have said "By Allah Who is above the Throne." Among his deeds is the gesture of pointing up with his finger, when addressing the people in the greatest gathering, on the Day of ‘Arafah during his Farewell Pilgrimage. He asked the people, "Have I not conveyed the message?" and they said, "Yes!" He asked again, "Have I not conveyed the message?" and they said, "Yes!" He asked a third time, “Have I not conveyed the message?" and they said "Yes!" Each time, he said: "O Allah, bear witness!" - pointing up to the sky and then at the people. He also used to raise his hands towards heaven when he made du’a (supplication), as reported in many ahadeeth. This is proof via his actions that Allah is exalted and high. An example of an approval of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) which indicates that Allah is exalted and high is the hadeeth (report) concerning the young slave girl, to whom the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: "Where is Allah?" She said: "In heaven." He asked, "Who am I?" She said, "The Messenger of Allah." So he said to her master: "Set her free, for she is a believer." Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 537 This young girl was uneducated, as many are, and she was a slave, but she knew that her Lord is above heaven. Some misguided people deny that Allah is above heaven, and say, "He is neither above nor below; neither to the right nor to the left. He is everywhere!" (3) The consensus of the scholars: The salaf (pious predecessors) agreed that Allah is above heaven, as is reported by scholars such as al-Dhahabi, may Allah have mercy on him, in his book Al-‘Aluw li’l-‘Aliy al-Ghaffar. (4) Common sense: Highness is a quality which is associated in people’s minds with perfection. If this is the case, then it should be attributed to Allah because every absolute perfection should be attributed to Him. (5) The innate instinct of man (fitrah). There should be no dispute that man instinctively knows that Allah is above heaven. Whenever something overwhelming befalls a person, and he turns to Allah for help, he looks towards heaven, not in any other direction. But it is strange that those who deny that Allah is above His creation still raise their hands in supplication to no other direction than towards heaven. Even Pharaoh, the enemy of Allah who disputed with Moosa (peace be upon him) about his Lord, told his minister Haman (interpretation of the meaning): "O Haman! Build me a tower that I may arrive at the ways, - the ways of the heavens, and I may look upon the god of Moosa …" [40:36-37] He knew in his heart of hearts that Allah is real, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): "And they belied them (those ayat/signs) wrongfully and arrogantly, though their own selves were convinced thereof …" [27:14] These are a few of the indications that Allah is above the heavens; this proof comes from the Quran, the Sunnah, the consensus of the scholars, common sense, man’s own instincts and even the words of the non-Muslims. We ask Allah to guide us towards the Truth.
@@khaledalarabi2777 the word of a khawarij, i prefer to be a follower of ahlus sunnah wal jama'ah than to be among of those 72 sects which the prophet saws mentioned in his hadith.
@@khaledalarabi2777 they are not much different with Christian and jews. Wahhabi always changed old book about religion like book Al Ibanah, they said imam abu hasan al asy'ari had 3 periods
There are many Muslims who believe in the Aqeedah acorring to the salaf or salafis who follow all 4 schools of thought not just hanbli such as sheikh Mohammed raslan ( may Allah be pleased with him ) from Egypt who is a shaafi scholar and a salafi and sheikh al albani who didn’t follow a madhab rahimu’Allah and many other salafi scholars who followed different madhabs of fiqh
@@nonameno5660 akhi looks like you know the creed of salaf better, would you love to have a discussion about it? what was the approach of salaf regarding attributes whether taweel or tafweed or tafweed al kayfiyyah.
@@nonameno5660 Bismillah okay akhi, first of all our discussion will be based around salaf only, not from scholars who came after them like ibn taymiyyah, bayhaqi and them. The first thing we are going to discuss is istiwa, what do you think all salaf did tafweed al mana on it, and they never gave it meaning? Or they did taweel?
السلام عليكم ورحمة الله وبركاته بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم All praise are due to Allah and peace and blessing upon His messenger (saws). My dear brother, I stopt your video at 1 min. In that minute you have showed the level of ignorence in your level when it comes to islam. The aqeedah of al 4 imams where the same, they differed in Fiqh.. My advice to you is to be sure of that what you know before speaking. May Allah grant us beneficial knowledge and keep us away from ignorance. Excuse me for my English i am from Holland so if i made some mistakes, my sincere apoligies.
from the word ."Tawheed" in you name you seem as a wahhabi, since wahhabis belive ALLAH is in the Sky so you are likle to be mushrik! and your wife is slave for us - muminun
Enemies of the Sunnah use the word Wahhabi as a derogatory word against Ahlus Sunnah, Salafis, Ahlul Hadeeth. Ahlus Sunnah believe what Allah and his Rasool said about Aqeedah literally. Allah has hands, fingers, feet, face etc..but as to how we leave that to Allah. We don't deny, ask how, is it like this or that or make similitude.
@@AbuMoosaa The true salaf never said what you say! Ya'll are just liers. Like imam Malik of the salaf said, we conform the ayat but asking how is a innovation! You just said how, by ascribing limbs. You are such a moron that you don't even notice what your saying. Shia say they follow the noble ahlul bayt but lie and slander the sahaba, your group lie that you follow the salaf yet make notions of God having this and that. You are no better then them, both are innovators! God almighty guides who he wills.
@@AbdullahodSandzak Yes these people are not following any scholars and they claim they are following salaf. May Allah forgive them and guide them to the right Aqidah
Maturidi and Ashaira are deviants, no doubt about that. They rejected Quranic verses. Why do you need maturidi or ashari, can't you get contentment with the word of Imam Malik. May Allah-swt guide you.
Theybare kor deviants. Wahabis are literalist tht are defn deviants.how on earth can you say imam ashari or imam maturidi are deviants? Learn the the truth. ALLAH s.w.t. is not confoned to any space or time. Dont read the mutashabihat verses literally
Salafis are increasing in number and also in influence, make as much videos as you can. Truth shall prevail. The Words of Allah AzzaWajal can only be interpreted by Allah AzzaWajal himself through His revelation to the prophets. How worse are those people who derives the meaning of the Words of Allah azzawajal as per his own reasoning and not by the Quran and Sunnah and the methodology of Salaf As Saleheen. Say NO to fake Sunni, Say NO to Ashari, Say NO to Maturidi, Say NO to Sufism, Say NO to ilm al Kalam, Say NO to Dervish Whirl Dancing, Say YES only to Islam, Say YES to QURAN, Say YES to SUNNAH, Say YES to MANHAJ of Salaf as Saleheen
You can not teach the four imams. Allah chose them. You have no right in teaching them. You either follow the way of Salafeeya, or you follow the Antropomorphist Najd sect.
The people of Sunnah and Jama’ah (adherents to the prophetic way) believe that Allah is exalted above His creation because of the evidence of the Quran, Sunnah (prophetic traditions), consensus of the scholars, common sense and man’s innate instinct (fitrah). (1) The Quran describes the "exaltedness" or "highness" of Allah in different ways, as His being high and above, and by describing how things come down from Him, and go up to Him, and by stating that He is above heaven. For example (interpretations of the meaning): (Highness): "… and He is the Most High, the Most Great." [2:255] "Glorify the Name of your Lord, the Most High." [87:1] (Above): "And He is the Irresistible, above His slaves …" [6:18] "They fear their Lord above them, and they do what they are commanded." [16:50] (Things coming down from Him): "He arranges (every) affair from the heavens to the earth … " [32:5] "Verily We: it is We Who have sent down the Dhikr (i.e., the Quran) …" [15:9] (Things going up to Him): "… To Him ascend (all) the goodly words, and the righteous deeds exalt it …" [35:10] "The angels and the Rooh (Jibreel) ascend to Him …" [70:4] (Allah is above heaven): "Do you feel secure that He, Who is over the heaven, will not cause the earth to sink with you …?" [67:16] (2) The Sunnah: Many reports were narrated "mutawatir" (i.e. with a large number of narrators at every stage of the isnad/chain, such that it is impossible for them all to have agreed on a lie) from the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him), describing his words and deeds and things of which he approved. For example, he used to say "Subhana Rabbi al-A’la (Glory be to my Lord Most High)" in sujood (prostration), and in some ahadeeth (reports) he is reported to have said "By Allah Who is above the Throne." Among his deeds is the gesture of pointing up with his finger, when addressing the people in the greatest gathering, on the Day of ‘Arafah during his Farewell Pilgrimage. He asked the people, "Have I not conveyed the message?" and they said, "Yes!" He asked again, "Have I not conveyed the message?" and they said, "Yes!" He asked a third time, “Have I not conveyed the message?" and they said "Yes!" Each time, he said: "O Allah, bear witness!" - pointing up to the sky and then at the people. He also used to raise his hands towards heaven when he made du’a (supplication), as reported in many ahadeeth. This is proof via his actions that Allah is exalted and high. An example of an approval of the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) which indicates that Allah is exalted and high is the hadeeth (report) concerning the young slave girl, to whom the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allah be upon him) said: "Where is Allah?" She said: "In heaven." He asked, "Who am I?" She said, "The Messenger of Allah." So he said to her master: "Set her free, for she is a believer." Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim 537 This young girl was uneducated, as many are, and she was a slave, but she knew that her Lord is above heaven. Some misguided people deny that Allah is above heaven, and say, "He is neither above nor below; neither to the right nor to the left. He is everywhere!" (3) The consensus of the scholars: The salaf (pious predecessors) agreed that Allah is above heaven, as is reported by scholars such as al-Dhahabi, may Allah have mercy on him, in his book Al-‘Aluw li’l-‘Aliy al-Ghaffar. (4) Common sense: Highness is a quality which is associated in people’s minds with perfection. If this is the case, then it should be attributed to Allah because every absolute perfection should be attributed to Him. (5) The innate instinct of man (fitrah). There should be no dispute that man instinctively knows that Allah is above heaven. Whenever something overwhelming befalls a person, and he turns to Allah for help, he looks towards heaven, not in any other direction. But it is strange that those who deny that Allah is above His creation still raise their hands in supplication to no other direction than towards heaven. Even Pharaoh, the enemy of Allah who disputed with Moosa (peace be upon him) about his Lord, told his minister Haman (interpretation of the meaning): "O Haman! Build me a tower that I may arrive at the ways, - the ways of the heavens, and I may look upon the god of Moosa …" [40:36-37] He knew in his heart of hearts that Allah is real, as He says (interpretation of the meaning): "And they belied them (those ayat/signs) wrongfully and arrogantly, though their own selves were convinced thereof …" [27:14] These are a few of the indications that Allah is above the heavens; this proof comes from the Quran, the Sunnah, the consensus of the scholars, common sense, man’s own instincts and even the words of the non-Muslims. We ask Allah to guide us towards the Truth.
So where was Allah before the heavens were created? Not above? As highness is a relative matter. Also your understanding entails God is encompassed by space as the heavens are in a space below him. Please miss us with your anthropomorphic beliefs.
@Yusuf Lewis *Claims anthropomorphism is to liken the creation to God and vehemently exonerates himself of doing that. But then directly proceeds to likening God to his creation. *facepalm
@@umarzaman9705 bruh he's above the throne the throne is the end of space,time,place and he's not in the throne he's above the throne so,he's not occupying anything to exist because the throne is the end of space,time, place and he's above them all
@@umarzaman9705 Ashari beleifs are contradictory to their own beleifs Like when they say that Allah Swt is all powerful Then it's likening ALLAH To his creation Bec i am also powerful in front of an ant Now u would say that He is All Powerful not just powerful But according to the their belief It's likening ALLAH To his creation 😐 And His independent will is also likening ALLAH To his creation bec humans also have free will And saying "i forgived him by the will of ALLAH bec ALLAH SWT commanded me to be merciful and forgiving" Is also likening ALLAH To his creation 😐 bec ALLAH SWT is most merciful And Al Hearer Is also likening ALLAH To his creation bec Humans can also hear Even animals can hear 😐 So brother u all Ashari brothers can say that "Oh he is All Powerful not just powerful,he is All hearer not just hearer, Most merciful not just merciful" This is contradictory to your own beleif 😐 Just like that we Salafis say that ALLAH swt have a hand but not like our hand Bec when u use the definition of Arm U use the definition of human hand not the hands of ALLAH SWT Allah Subhanahu Wa Ta'ala said: فَاطِرُ السَّمٰوٰتِ وَالْأَرْضِ ۚ جَعَلَ لَكُمْ مِّنْ أَنْفُسِكُمْ أَزْوٰجًا وَمِنَ الْأَنْعٰمِ أَزْوٰجًا ۖ يَذْرَؤُكُمْ فِيهِ ۚ لَيْسَ كَمِثْلِهِۦ شَىْءٌ ۖ وَهُوَ السَّمِيعُ الْبَصِيرُ "[He is] Creator of the heavens and the earth. He has made for you from yourselves, mates, and among the cattle, mates; He multiplies you thereby. There is nothing like unto Him, and He is the Hearing, the Seeing." (QS. Ash-Shura 42: Verse 11) Salafis make sense in this matter And power is power whether it's limited or unlimited Knowledge is knowledge whether it's limited or unlimited Existence is Existence whether it's human existence or ALLAH's existence Hand is hand whether it's human dependant hand or the hands of ALLAH SWT U ash'aris are double standards lol U people use the human definition of hand or throne to describe the hands or Throne of ALLAH SWT Which is contradictory to the Qur'an itself Chapter 42 verse 11 "There's nothing like him" U have to be consistent if ur affirming the existence of ALLAH SWT and not comparing human existence to the Existence of ALLAH SWT Then u have to do the same with the hands of ALLAH SWT U cannot compare the hands of ALLAH SWT to the hands of humans Why not the Ash'aris or Maturidis,Mutazilis,Jahmis do not use their so called rationalism when ALLAH SWT talk about the unseen like heaven and hell, Jinns, After life, Judgement day etc Why not? Be consistent U people cannot use the human definition of hand to describe the unseen hands of ALLAH SWT Which is completely wrong Can we deny ALLAH's existence because humans also exist Can we deny ALLAH's hand because humans also have hands Can we deny ALLAH's power because humans also have power Can we deny ALLAH's knowledge Because humans also have knowledge Can we deny ALLAH's help because humans can also help Can we deny ALLAH's mercy because humans can also show mercy? Can we deny ALLAH's independent will because humans also have their own independent will? Can we deny ALLAH's attribute of all sustainer because humans can also sustain? U would say "Oh, he's all sustainer not just sustainer not just sustainer" But sustainer is sustainer whether it's all sustainer or just sustainer And now u would ask me that "GOD's existence is uncreated and human's existence is created And the word hand comes from the human existence so,when there was no human beings GOD had no hands?" Response U doesn't even have the right to believe in ALLAH's existence if ur asking this question because ALLAH's existence is uncreated and human's existence is created And the word "existence" came from the creation like if there was no creation there would be no language and if there would be no Language then the word "existence" wouldn't have existed So, does that mean that GOD doesn't exist today?