The AZP S-60 Anti-Aircraft Gun 

And teabags that are waterproof I think they had the remit mixed up 😅😅😅

Indeed. Ukraine uses it both for the anti-drone as well as the anti-z role.

Thanks Ganisol, I don't know what part of the world you live in matey but I appreciate your reply. Be safe my friend

Just ask any taxi driver. They all know where it is.

So true😊😊

🤣 YES!

Good luck with that brother. We will be lucky to have air rifles soon.

@@toesone Meet me behind the old fish pier at dawn. We’ll settle this like men.

yes it has a computer & it stays on target automatically

The entire thing is basically an unscaled Bofors. The "designer" didn't do a whole lot other than steal.

Google Maj. Kim Campbell...

@@ray.shoesmith pretty epic tale to tell the kids, a lot to be said for flying by the seat of your pants and not reliant on electronics (thankfully the A-10 had the manual flight capability) but the image is interesting, the splatter up the fuselage looks rather like machine gun fire at close range with neat round holes and not an expected pattern of shrapnel tears as seen in the wing (probably a mass of ball bearings) - maybe i'm wrong there, but i have a little limited experience with ballistics - either way, i guess exploding shells are fairly effective, still quite a bit of luck involved, a number of guns and much ammunition aimed at one plane can be effective if just one shell hits home - but are those odds cost effective in todays war

A good ground defence against aircraft attack is multi-layered & can't be reduced to just modern missiles - there will always be a need for close in AA guns - consider hedge-hopping approaching attackers. Close range AA is very effective at defending a point target - sensible pilots never went around for a second go knowing defences are alerted. You can't measure AA success based on kills, there's also the reduced damage to installations because ground attack effectiveness was curtailed. Also WWII German POW camps had plenty of aircrews who made that heroic second pass on a target. Young gung-ho pilots take uncalculated risks & they pay dearly.

Allied bombers feared the 88mm flak for good reason, the Germans were pretty darn good at dialing it in on them. But with hundreds of bombers per wave and multiple waves, enough will slip through eventually. Likewise the US 5" dual-purpose naval guns in the AA role with proximity fuse shells were very effective in the pacific theater. The 40mm Bofors and 20mm Oerlikons lost a lot of their effect when the Japanese employed their kamikaze tactic, as these small calibers didnt have sufficent range and stopping power for a pilot with a punched one-way ticket.

Fawlty towers 😂

Because it was so obvious that it didn't need to be mentioned?

@@obsidianjane4413 Then why was last weeks video titled 'British Churchill' and the week before 'Japanese 47mm', were they not obvious too? The only thing obvious it is the blatant omission of the country of origin.

@@mangoman9290 It must be nice to have nothing else more important to be butt hurt about....

@@obsidianjane4413 Ah, there we go, you have no reasonable argument on why it wasnt mentioned so now you move to insults, lol.

There are a lot of Ukrainians in Australia, the museum is simply afraid (or really doesn’t want) to mention the USSR or the Russian Federation once again.

He actually says "This exhibit was acquired by the Museum from Bulgaria " starting @ about 4:03 ! !

Yeah, the political correctness is pretty thick here in Australia unfortunately.

@@Kamina1703 And yet....

@@ashleysmith3106 Yes, but that doesn't mean it's Bulgarian. And it isn't.

Still in the inventories of most countries that got Soviet goodies.