Тёмный

The B 21 Raider Stealthy, Fast, and Deadly: what we know so far 

PilotPhotog
Подписаться 129 тыс.
Просмотров 1,9 млн
50% 1

Let’s take a look at what we know so far about the B-21 Raider - and why it is crucial to America’s future.
After years of anticipation, Northrop finally announced they will be revealing the world’s newest stealth Heavy bomber - the B-21 Raider. The B-21 is named in honor of Jimmy Dolittle’s B-25 Raiders, which famously attacked Imperial Japan shortly after the events of Pearl Harbor during World War II. The B-21 Raider builds on the success of its legendary predecessor, the B-2 Spirit which was also developed by Northrop. Today we will take a look at what we know about the B21 so far, the missions it could fly, why a flying wing is important for stealth, and what the B-21 Raider means for America’s future.
All about the F-35's adaptive engine which may get used by the B-21 Raider as well:
• Faster Lightnings! Upg...
PilotPhotog Merch Store!
shop.pilotphotog.com
►Want to help support this channel?
Subscribe on Patreon: / pilotphotog
►Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @pilotphotog
►Books and flight sim gear I recommend:
www.amazon.com/shop/pilotphotog
Buying from my storefront gives me a small commission and helps support this channel
Patrons and channel members get early access to ad free videos
Follow me on other social media:
📸 Instagram - / pilotphotog
📖Facebook - / pilotphotog
🐦Twitter - / pilotphotog
👾Twitch: / pilotphotog
🎮 Discord: / discord
►Join our growing community on Discord:
/ discord
Photography and video Credits/Attributions:
"The appearance of U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) visual information does not imply or constitute DoD endorsement."
Department of Defense
Boeing
Lockheed Martin
Northrop Grumman

Опубликовано:

 

24 ноя 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 1,4 тыс.   
@maxcorder2211
@maxcorder2211 Год назад
When the last B-21 Raider is retired, probably 40 years from now, the only bomber remaining in the Air Force will be the B-52.
@solanaceae2069
@solanaceae2069 Год назад
Was fishing overnight in a boat out in the middle of lake when what had to be a B-2 passed low overhead during a pitch black moonless night. It was massive, and eerily nearly silent. When I got back home I jumped online and saw there had been an air show in another state where a B-2 had flown. I was nearly dead center between there and the bird's home base. Apparently many other witnesses in the area didn't notice the small aircraft strobes, because they were convinced it was "a UFO."
@DMillerFlorida
@DMillerFlorida 10 месяцев назад
I just had a craft fly over my home at 330 a.m. and there was absolutely no sound. No lights. And it was triangular. Then, oddly enough, I watched another one that evening in the shape of a v with no sound and no lights. These were huge. About the size of three or four planes. I've had the bomber fly over my last house a few miles away and these definitely were no bombers. I'm on a hunt to find out what these were because the internet is full of people giving up and calling them UFOs. There's an explanation and I'm determined.
@Dirk80241
@Dirk80241 Год назад
This is an excellent video that excels in giving detailed information with beautiful, to the point footage.Respect!
@koori3085
@koori3085 Год назад
Great video as always! Your resources must be extreme! Thanks!
@ELJefeReviews
@ELJefeReviews Год назад
I'm excited to see your upcoming video on the B-21!
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Thank you and good to see you here!!!
@Dirk80241
@Dirk80241 Год назад
Marvelous detail: the rotating refuleing access panel at 7:20. Amazing footage.
@ignacios1562
@ignacios1562 Год назад
pure aerodynamics
@cbesh0
@cbesh0 Год назад
Great video on the B-21. Can't wait to see the upcoming B-52 video!!
@kevinblackburn3198
@kevinblackburn3198 Год назад
well narrated and informative video. thank you
@bullpupgaming708
@bullpupgaming708 Год назад
The B-52 will definitely outlive all of us. It will be the first bomber to bomb alien bases on Mars lol
@Tony-bg6ql
@Tony-bg6ql Год назад
There once was a weird story telling creep coworker who stated to multiple people that he once made a dilivery to an Air Force base and that the Sergeant "liked him so much" that he granted him a sneak peak and access to a similar aircraft that would camouflage electronically and the made up material felt like Gel. He also said that he also sat in the cockpit and that with just the pilots helmet everything would turned on by commands. I then told him to SPLIT that joint in half next time he smoked and to stop watching so many sci-fi flicks
@michaelharris4651
@michaelharris4651 Год назад
@@Tony-bg6ql must of smoked some pretty good weed 😵‍💫🤣
@johndavis8174
@johndavis8174 Год назад
I think your probably closer to truth than Society realizes!!!!but we're getting slowly drip fed for we all know a person is smart but people are dangerous an panicky an cause rioting for the most petty of causes!!
@jimmiesmith5590
@jimmiesmith5590 Год назад
Lay off that chit
@Dirk80241
@Dirk80241 Год назад
Surprise: “More on that later” when I thought I heard all there is to hear about the B-21. This was the start of a very insightful explanation of stealth technology. Super!
@jackempson3044
@jackempson3044 Год назад
I saw a B-2 fly over low and turn above me. It gave me chills and brought tears to my eyes I was so overwhelmed. It was like I was awoken to how far into the future we are from my childhood. It looked like something from Star Wars
@Mike___Kilo
@Mike___Kilo Год назад
Had a similar experience. Thought I was seeing a UFO at first!
@johnshields9110
@johnshields9110 Год назад
There's nothing like getting a close up pass by an aircraft to stir the spirit and imagination! I've been lucky throught out my life. A F-4 blasted by over our old farm house at tree top level when I was a kid; he was trying to catch up with a bomber training flight that had went over earlier. I've also had an F-117, and a F-35 pass closely over head when floating down a river near Little Paxtent Maryland. Most moving of all, I in a rented white 4 x4, cross country wheeling and had pulled up near a boundary of a bomb testing range in AZ. Two A-10's came low out of a canyon, and as only A-10's can, did than nose up then stand on a downward wingtip and cruised right towards me and scorched over my head about a 100 ft above. I think they were showing off for me, or meant to scare me for being near the testing range; ha, ha, they did both!
@d3neu
@d3neu Год назад
Probably allows for some deniablity if it isn't a ufo. Cause apparently these make regular flights in and out of the world airspace aswell. Maybe maybe .
@panpiper
@panpiper Год назад
@@johnshields9110 They were probably using you for target practice. 😉
@DARPA_itsnotReal
@DARPA_itsnotReal Год назад
@@panpiper lol 😆
@TROOPERfarcry
@TROOPERfarcry Год назад
Does it have cup-holders? So sick of upgrades that don't include basic amenities available in a 1980 Ford Escort (for a small upcharge).
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 Год назад
lol
@merlesmith6794
@merlesmith6794 Год назад
Found the pilot 😂👍
@imfloridano5448
@imfloridano5448 Год назад
Of course it has $5million cup holders and $20k toilet seats😁
@prezzotheplacetobe2768
@prezzotheplacetobe2768 Год назад
Believe the B2 has toilet amenities and a small kitchen too. The Russian bombers definitely do so can imagine the B21 will be tip-top
@Will-dn9dq
@Will-dn9dq Год назад
Seriously wtf my ashtray! Lol
@nathaniellazo5912
@nathaniellazo5912 Год назад
Can't wait to see the B-21 finally be revealed!!
@xenophagia
@xenophagia Год назад
I cant either, brotha!
@FoulPet
@FoulPet Год назад
Pretty much revealed it here.
@dianapennepacker6854
@dianapennepacker6854 Год назад
I can't wait to see what it does that the b2 couldn't be upgraded to do. I guess the b2 lifetime is running low for the fleet. Surprised they have a smaller payload... I wonder if the AF has given up on the super fast missile trucks concept as well. A insanely fast airframe that can get near and unload a ton of missiles at key targets and retreat. (Either flying as low as possible or high.)
@bk-lx6cb
@bk-lx6cb Год назад
It's just a b2 with upgraded avionics lol
@BigE743
@BigE743 Год назад
Dec2 keep an eye out!
@dalerobertson4986
@dalerobertson4986 Год назад
Wow man you killed it...... Great Job... Love it
@romeogomez4158
@romeogomez4158 Год назад
Great Video ,very detailed
@GolddenWaffles
@GolddenWaffles Год назад
Dude your videos are like the best informative videos on RU-vid
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Thank you Max! I try to get a little better each time, glad you enjoy the content
@gary5481
@gary5481 Год назад
Great content & well presented. I've just subscribed & look forward to the video on the unveiling of the B21.
@dunningkruger3774
@dunningkruger3774 Год назад
I first stood by the SR-71 in 1966 at Edwards. Dad worked at China Lake and we were friends with a lot of test pilots including Bill Dana who flew the X-15. We watched the SR-71 do some fly bys and it was like watching star wars. I always felt privileged to enter the bases and read the sign that said "what you see here, what you hear hear....let it stay here". I never got the chance to see the B-2. A good friend was driving home from a fishing trip up at Kennedy Meadows and was going 90mph in the upper valley when to his right at about 100ft off the deck was a B-1 Lancer, wings spread to go as slow as he could. He could see the pilot as the plane accelerated with full afterburners, wings folding back, and went straight up at the end of the valley over the mountains. "Coolest thing I ever saw".
@TheDavidGill
@TheDavidGill Год назад
Excellent work. Bravo !
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Thank you! Cheers!
@jpierce2l33t
@jpierce2l33t Год назад
I've had Dec 2nd marked on my calender since the announcement!!! Can't wait to see this beauty!!
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Same here!
@jpierce2l33t
@jpierce2l33t Год назад
@@PilotPhotog it's exciting huh?! Oh yeah I meant to say, great video! Lol
@paolo11x11
@paolo11x11 Год назад
Some very nice footage of some amazing aircraft. Looking forward to the B 21 unveiling!
@aldocosta1220
@aldocosta1220 Год назад
Great work. Beautiful design
@jonniiinferno9098
@jonniiinferno9098 Год назад
great video - very informative - as always. Love your channel !!!
@Viperboeing757
@Viperboeing757 Год назад
Bro , you definitely have a gift . I always look forward to your next video and have yet to be disappointed . You are very good at what you do Tog , and I know you'll keep up the great work and these awesome videos . As usual , two enthusiastic thumbs up from this camp bro . 👍👍🇺🇲
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Duncan thank you so much, I appreciate your support and always look forward to your comments, cheers!
@1999NIRUPAM
@1999NIRUPAM Год назад
Wow, this was incredibly detailed and went into the depth of current stealth tech. Thought I knew everything about stealth aircraft and surprisingly came to know more from your video. Great work and waiting for more.
@freemanfornow264
@freemanfornow264 Год назад
It really didn't go in depth at all.... not relative to what capabilities and components ACTUALLY are available on it
@benjamina913
@benjamina913 Год назад
I hope that plane doesn't end up being a junk like the F35!
@d1zguy864
@d1zguy864 Год назад
@@benjamina913 it will. Its just used for profiteering and keep the military spending being funneled to contractors and into the economy.
@xenophagia
@xenophagia Год назад
Excellent and very informative video as always Tog! Looking forward to what you decide to do for the B21 reveal. Whatever you decide to do, I'm here for it!🤘
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Thank you so much! I may not be able to livestream, but I will definitely make an update video.
@michaelgerstendorfer3493
@michaelgerstendorfer3493 Год назад
Horten Ho 229
@kozmiczian
@kozmiczian Год назад
Informative, consise.
@cut--
@cut-- Год назад
great show! subbed
@johngiegler7653
@johngiegler7653 Год назад
It's interesting how knowledge builds on itself. From what I've read, the flying-wing design was patented by Hugo Junkers in 1910. Then the Horten brothers developed a flying-wing glider in 1932. In 1945, the brothers developed and flew the first prototype jet engine-powered flying-wing for the German government. Now look how far we've come with this complex work of art!
@666theninja
@666theninja Год назад
HO229 was the first Jet Engine Flying Wing, well before Northrop.
@johngiegler633
@johngiegler633 Год назад
I wonder what the radar cross section was of these earlier flying wings?
@666theninja
@666theninja Год назад
@@johngiegler633 Northrop said it was a very low cross section on the HO229 as all Flyingwing shape has it by nature.
@SCIFIguy64
@SCIFIguy64 Год назад
They did not inspire a flying wing bomber or stealth in any way. Stop this meme and accept that convergent technologies exist (XB-35 was drafted in 1939)
@SCIFIguy64
@SCIFIguy64 Год назад
@@johngiegler633 Not great, tests proved it could be detected by British radar relatively easily. It was still """stealthy""" in that it wasn't nearly as noticeable as a conventional plane, but it still soaked up that sweet, sweet IR energy.
@Bigdaddyslasher
@Bigdaddyslasher Год назад
The Horten brother's legacy lives on.
@hr-g4640
@hr-g4640 Год назад
I am sure they would be proud of their legacy being destroying the world to perpetuate the elites in power
@chrisblack6258
@chrisblack6258 Год назад
No, it's from Northrop's flying wing, not the German one.
@scottlavoie6157
@scottlavoie6157 Год назад
That's it , I thought that was soon as I saw it
@Bigdaddyslasher
@Bigdaddyslasher Год назад
@@chrisblack6258 you should research about it the Horten Brothers they did it 1st. America got the jet engine from the Nazis. America went to space because of Nazis. America took in many Nazi scientists during and after the war.
@Mygg_Jeager
@Mygg_Jeager 10 месяцев назад
@@chrisblack6258 pray tell, where did Northrop get its flying wing idea from? XD
@freeliberalminds
@freeliberalminds Год назад
Great! Thanks for this video tech warfare updates.
@YlmazDALKIRANscallion
@YlmazDALKIRANscallion Год назад
Great video
@Hudsonlane
@Hudsonlane Год назад
I'm surprised that their was no mention of the Horten Ho 229
@666theninja
@666theninja Год назад
100%
@20somthingdrifter11
@20somthingdrifter11 Год назад
Because the Horton Brothers actually didn't do a ton of work on 229, it was mostly done by the Gothaer Waggonfabrik Company rather than the Horton Brothers, additionally most the work on flying wings that contributed to the B-2 and B-21 was taken from the Earlier work done by Jack Northrup, who did far more to advance the flying wing design then the Horton Brothers ever did, they had a glider, Jack developed a Prototype Demonstrator, Piston Bomber, Jet Bomber and Jet Fighter version of the flying wing. The fact that they only mentioned Northrup and not Jack Northrup specifically is the Criminal Statement, there is very little evidence that the Horton Brothers design added much to the development of the B1 because Jack Northrup was already working on them during the war.
@LostAnFound
@LostAnFound Год назад
Horten brothers are receiving undo fame. Northrop was flying a propeller-driven wing in the 20s. It's yellow and on display at Dulles
@666theninja
@666theninja Год назад
@@20somthingdrifter11 The Horten Brothers did the HO229 and have said they did it. The First Flyingwing with Jet Engines in the World was by the Horten's, well before Northrop that is Fact. Horten and Northrop both started with Gliders. Horten's went Jet Engines first and Northrop were Prop Engines as you should know.
@rexrex429
@rexrex429 Год назад
Seriously, why does everyone compare stuff like the B2 and the B21 to the Ho 229. Don't get me wrong, I like the Ho 229, but saying that it had influence to the B2 or B21 design is false. Flying wing designs existed before the Ho 229. The only similarities the Ho229 had to the B2 and such is that they both had jet engines and are flying wings. The ho 229 wasn't designed to be stealthy at all, and the Horton brother claims to that were BS. The main reason Germany had Jets before the Allies (and not by much at that) was because the treaty of Versailles prevented Germany from developing aircraft engines, so to get around that they focused more on rockets and in turn jet engines. This led to them having a slight head start in that field but also led to them having inferior aircraft compared to the Allies throughout most of the war. It really bothers me when people unironically say Germany was more technologically advanced compared to the Allies in WW2, because in reality they weren't.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Год назад
Well done TOGington x
@Chironex_Fleckeri
@Chironex_Fleckeri Год назад
Although it's not regaining. It's overmatched. Just how America likes it. Technologically and organizationally, nothing comes close to American air power and its absolute dedication to the idea that a battle can be won before it's ever fought with all the advantages afforded by air dominance.
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Thanks SuperCap!
@timswartz4520
@timswartz4520 Год назад
Brilliant and Thank You. You read my dreams before CHATGPT did. Subscribed and liked.
@MetalDetectoristMick
@MetalDetectoristMick 8 месяцев назад
I remember when the B2 was unveiled they prohibited the media from photographing the tail section of the engine. I think this must have been some weakness they found in the design. My brother was on the outskirts of the county in which we lived. He said he heard an aircraft approaching but didn't think much of it until he saw it. It was a B2 which had yet to be unveiled. Said it scared the hell out of him because he did know what he had just seen.
@glynjones8187
@glynjones8187 Год назад
I always remember reading that when they were testing the RCA of the have blue that they realised that they were seeing the pole it was placed on and not the aircraft, so they went away and had to redesign the pole to actually get a true RCA.
@pnichols6500
@pnichols6500 Год назад
They took the blue off the stand when the Russian satellite was coming around, later we found out the Russians were able to detect the shape from the heat differential caused by the shadow.
@bennieknape4857
@bennieknape4857 Год назад
That was a long time ago.
@bennieknape4857
@bennieknape4857 Год назад
​@@pnichols6500 that was the theSR - 71 or arc- angle I thought? The Russians could see the shadow on the tarmac,when they wheeled it in to the hanger.
@spiff1003
@spiff1003 Год назад
@@pnichols6500 The story is correct, but I believe that was the SR-71 Blackbird. Not the Have Blue. The russians had drawings of the silhouette of the SR-71 before they actually had seen the plane.
@pnichols6500
@pnichols6500 Год назад
@@spiff1003 Thanks for updating my memory!!
@appa609
@appa609 Год назад
It's stealthy *because* it's big. Even fairly long wave radar reflects rather than diffracts off the B-2.
@blueskiestrevor5200
@blueskiestrevor5200 Год назад
Actually the way stealth works size has nothing to do with it. Whether you scaled the plane up 200% or down 50% it would still have the same radar cross section (RCS) no matter what. It is the shape and materials that matter not size.
@MrDJAK777
@MrDJAK777 Год назад
@@blueskiestrevor5200 in the real world you literally can't change the scale of something without correcting design/shape + validation of the materials under new stress to not break every thing like any one to one scale shift would. RAS is the future form of stealth take a RAM layer and sandwich it between a refractive layer to guide radiation inward to be absorbed by the RAM generating heat and a reflective layer to bounce any that isn't another chance to be absorbed and residual then directed away from source. All made into a composite material that can be formed to serve as the actual airframe/structural components.some sort of skin cooling to counter the IR sig gain might be tricky and maintenance hell but that could be solved with enough 0s
@appa609
@appa609 Год назад
@@blueskiestrevor5200 A stealth aircraft is a set of inclined mirrors. The reflection of a plane wave off a mirror of length d produces an interference pattern with angular lobe width θ⁰ ≈ λ/d. The bigger aircraft produces a narrower beam and returns higher order side lobes with substantially lower power.
@akhtarnadeem621
@akhtarnadeem621 Год назад
Excellent!
@chrislong3938
@chrislong3938 Год назад
I can't wait for it to be unveiled tonight!!!
@josephfranzen9196
@josephfranzen9196 Год назад
Just found your channel today! Absolutely amazing coverage man, I appreciate the time and the professionalism you’ve put into your content. Keep up the amazing work! I remember going to an air show as a kid and seeing an F-117 and just being amazed at the size of it, I had never seen military aircraft in real life. Even an F/A-18 seemed exponentially larger than I had imagined and it blew my mind how capable it was. I spent 8 years in the 82nd 1st/504th but was primarily around Blackhawks and CH-47’s or AH-64’s. The few times in country where I was able to get up close to fighter aircraft is one of my favorite memories. They’re fascinating to me and certainly were a welcome addition on the battlefield. You had a feeling of security so to speak when you knew CAS was inbound. To this day I’m still in awe of the skill sets of rotary and fixed wing aircraft pilots, my MOS (11B) doesn’t take a rocket scientist to get into, I mean we put in work out there but as much as the Army gives the Air Force crap I was and will always be in awe of our fighter aircraft and their support crews and pilots. Are the F-22 and F-35 still on the cutting edge? It’s just not something I’m in the know about.
@ruthnoya8424
@ruthnoya8424 Год назад
F35 avionics are decades ahead of the F22's (which started in the 80s and entered production in 97). But, the F35's raw kinetic performance pales in comparison to the much larger, more powerful, thrust vectored F22. They only ended up making 187 F22s instead of the thousands originally planned, as it was to takeover the F15s role. Supposedly the 22 is going to be put out to pasture within a decade as it's costly to maintain and spares are almost non-existent for some items as it's tooling was shut down a decade+ ago in favor of the multinational, MONEY MAKING F35. Japan, UK, Australia...everyone wanted the F22 but I've read the highups didn't want our greatest ally 🇮🇱 getting their skeety mitz on it so the GOA banned export as to not offend the rabbis.
@josephfranzen9196
@josephfranzen9196 Год назад
@@ruthnoya8424 Thanks so much for the info! There’s so much about aircraft I just don’t know but any free time I have I’ve been trying to educate myself as it’s absolutely fascinating. Really appreciate it!
@redbaron977
@redbaron977 Год назад
We finally caught up to the HO-229
@jasonh289
@jasonh289 Год назад
If you can kindly station 5 of these in Australia it will be much appreciated. Regards your mates down under Cheers
@calvinhunt2335
@calvinhunt2335 Год назад
It will allow America to retain the edge in stealth bomber technology, not regain.
@podnolej7784
@podnolej7784 Год назад
Exactly .
@evl1536
@evl1536 Год назад
No one except the United States makes this type of aircraft, for various reasons. But let me remind you that in the 99th year in Yugoslavia, the F-117 was shot down by an outdated soviet S-125 complex. That is, there are questions - what is this advantage and whether it is so necessary in the era of hypersonic weapon and reconnaissance satellites, especially for such money?
@Cleon851
@Cleon851 Год назад
@@evl1536 stealth had no factor in that downing and it was the pilot who made the error
@evl1536
@evl1536 Год назад
@@Cleon851 I would argue, but I don't know the facts. I can only say that the old radars operate in the meter range, while having a number of disadvantages, such as high sensitivity in clouds. And the Stealth concept was developed based on modern radars at that time, which worked in the decimeter and centimeter ranges. And it's worth remembering that Stealth technology does not make the aircraft invisible, but simply reduces visibility at a distance, and the C-125 has a short range. And the last fact is that Stealth technology was developed based on the scientific works of Soviet scientist Pyotr Ufimtsev, his book, which was publicly available in the USSR, was used by Lockheed in their developments, but in the 90s, when Ufimtsev emigrated to the United States, he admitted that there was a second classified book that described how to detect aircraft manufactured using this technology. Never again have planes made using stealth technology collided with Soviet anti-aircraft complexes. (True, for the reason that these aircraft are too difficult to maintain and only very few American bases can serve them.) Therefore, we do not have statistics and it is difficult to discuss the reasons.
@seanavp
@seanavp Год назад
@@evl1536 *The laser weapon on our Raider can overcome any hypersonic weapon - assuming you can actually find and target 🎯 the aircraft to begin with.* *Hypersonic weapons are not miracle weapons - Are Russian hypersonic missiles downing Ukrainian aircraft? No.* *Are Russian hypersonic missiles destroying HIMARS in Ukraine? No.* *Are hypersonic weapons winning the war for Ukraine? No.* *We also have a variety of hypersonic missiles and we have ways to repel hypersonic missiles as well.* *This is a common theme from American haters - hypersonic missiles will defeat our military - I wouldn't count on it.*
@WilliamKing-hf8lc
@WilliamKing-hf8lc Год назад
Awesome. Wonder if they have an operational squadron yet. B-52, B-1, B-2 and now B-21. That's one hell of a diverse heavy bomber fleet at least for now.
@kevinblackburn3198
@kevinblackburn3198 Год назад
that's a world beating fleet for sure
@battlebornsupermoto954
@battlebornsupermoto954 Год назад
B21s go in unmanned, bomb while b2s are back with LRSMs then b1s then b52s.
@stevierios7372
@stevierios7372 Год назад
USA should just go full Sparta and cut out the cancel culture rainbow people no way this is the culmination of 4000+ years of civilization and we run the risk of imploding and falling to outside and inside forces
@Val2073
@Val2073 Год назад
It will only be B-52 and B-21. The B-21 is replacing both the B-1 and the B-2.
@Kenny-yl9pc
@Kenny-yl9pc Год назад
@@Val2073 "only" B52 and B21 xD I know how you meant it, but it really sounds funny though lol xD I am not well-informed in this regard, but isn't it premature to retire the B2´s completely? If the airframe is still in a good shape, then surely one could maintain it even while taking B21´s into service. Or am I missing something here? I mean, I understand the budgetary constraints and that it could make sense to retire them early in order to save the maintenance and operating costs. But is it really necessary? Even when the B2 is an older model, it still is a very much capable platform and can contribute to the operational strategy of the US air force.
@Dirk80241
@Dirk80241 Год назад
This is the 1000th comment on this video. Congatulations to the author of this channel!
@PaulieLDP
@PaulieLDP Год назад
Very excited for the reveal in a week.
@JosephVeee
@JosephVeee Год назад
I agree the B-52 will out live us. Even when finally put out of service someone somewhere will keep one or 2 in the air long after anyone of us watching this. That along with the A-10 are icons and I love them!
@Turboy65
@Turboy65 Год назад
When the last B-21 is flown to the Davis-Monthan boneyard, a B-52 will take its crew back home.
@jackiemack8653
@jackiemack8653 Год назад
Yes! A-10 thunderbolt II lives on
@leeming1317
@leeming1317 Год назад
10:50 It's crazy that in a sense we are creating titans of the sky that as you point out will out-live us all. What a beast of an airframe... Was this the one designed with slide-rules right? What a marvelous era for engineering!
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Indeed, the B-52 was designed in an era of slide rules and one of the first concepts for the airplane was sketched out on the back of a napkin from what I understand. Thanks for commenting!
@pooproach7412
@pooproach7412 Год назад
@jamesdeer3129😢
@davidomego
@davidomego Год назад
What I needed
@citizenblue
@citizenblue Год назад
Can't wait for the reveal!!
@seanclark6438
@seanclark6438 Год назад
I’ve been lucky enough to see the B2 for myself once, it is the most unreal experience watching that preform a fly past, the B21 will be a game changer and fascinating to see when unveiled
@seanclark6438
@seanclark6438 Год назад
Here’s me thinking they only ever built 31 B2 and lost 1 so the goal of 100 B21 is ambitious, I like the nod to the Doolittle raiders though
@GenghisX999
@GenghisX999 Год назад
How do you think this B21 thing will change the game. It seems it has already been rendered obsolete as evident by the unfolding scenario in Ukraine. No aircraft is safe flying in environment of modern air defense. Targets can be utterly destroyed with long range precision stand -off missiles. The cost each at $700 million estimated (LMOA if you believe that - much more likely at $1.5 billion final not including service and maintenance) would be much better spent purchasing 700 cruise missiles and would have much better in theater effect. But the ever-hungry MIC needs to be fed.
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent
Very well made video and lets all appreciate the fact that the US Air Force has accepted that nothing can replace the B-52 and no longer try to find a replacement for it and accept its eternal. As for the B-2. Something tells me well the B-21 fleet grows the B-2 will continue to remain in-service and likely refitted to standard a couple more times before it eventually is retired. Making it closer to its replacement. The BONE however. Yeah we can accept that its reaching its end..
@panpiper
@panpiper Год назад
I constantly struggle with the fact that the B-52 is a vastly more economical method of delivering heavy bomb loads than anything more modern. It has over twice the payload of the B-21 raider at one eighth the acquisition cost. It's only downside is that the US cannot dare deploy it anywhere it does not have absolute air dominance. Fortunately for the Air Force, there are many parts of the world where the US can find itself involved where is DOES enjoy absolute air dominance.
@Quetzalcoatl_Feathered_Serpent
@@panpiper that and the fact the airforce figured out that the b52 makes a wonderful cruise missile platform
@Rob_F8F
@Rob_F8F Год назад
Bold move to put out a B-21 video one week before its unveiling. Run the risk that the video becomes dated by the unveiling. I recall that Testor released a model of the F-117 based on the very deceptive photo that the USAF had released. The model had a wing sweep more like the B-2 than the very raked sweep of the actual F-117.
@Triple87
@Triple87 Год назад
Excellent video as always. Can’t wait for December 2nd. It’s going to be a big moment. All eyes will be on the US.
@spartancrown
@spartancrown Год назад
I’ll believe they do a full purchase of B21’s when it happens. So far they haven’t kept their intended production numbers on platforms in a long time.
@Chironex_Fleckeri
@Chironex_Fleckeri Год назад
Usually a variety of reasons for this. #1 being that we already have overmatch when it comes to controlling the skies. Soon we won't need as many pilots. They'll be part of the nuclear deterrent triad. When the button is pushed, there's no running away. Always and never. No mistakes, but always ready. That has been the way the deterrent forces have operated within NATO and specifically the USA. They're scary
@ch0wned
@ch0wned Год назад
@@Chironex_Fleckeri Nothing is beyond our reach.
@d1zguy864
@d1zguy864 Год назад
I hope they dont. 100 of these is completely unnecesarry
@dancotterman1267
@dancotterman1267 Год назад
One big reason for not producing as many is that technology is moving much faster and things become obsolete so new designs are prioritized. Like it was for the B-1, cancelled for the B-2. Also the world is catching up to us and pushing us to better designs all the time.
@DefaultProphet
@DefaultProphet Год назад
It sure would be cool if the missile truck concept was built into the Raider.
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer Год назад
If the “B”21 is the same platform as NGAD that’ll be a good chuckle.
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 Год назад
it might have some drone wingmen that are Air-to-air missile trucks and the B-21 could carry cruise missiles then, perhaps have something from the NGAD family of systems there
@DefaultProphet
@DefaultProphet Год назад
@@Justanotherconsumer What are you saying?
@Chimpunk729
@Chimpunk729 Год назад
I will wait the dec 2nd! It gonna be magnificent
@cristianocollarin2236
@cristianocollarin2236 Год назад
Can’t wait! Few hours left
@lightspeedvictory
@lightspeedvictory Год назад
Love that model of the B-21. Prefer it over others I’ve seen. Here’s hoping that’s what it looks like
@JunkztrGaming
@JunkztrGaming Год назад
I love being in the Airforce and seeing all the beautiful aircraft around me
@MainFrameGamerz
@MainFrameGamerz 9 месяцев назад
The Northrop YB-49 Flying wing was found to be very hard to detect at certain angles by radar, mostly *Edge on* Horten Flying wing design was also hard to detect at again "Certain angles"
@waynehowell431
@waynehowell431 Год назад
Thanks!
@高橋澄一
@高橋澄一 Год назад
I can not wait until the B-21 gets shown but it will more than likely resemble the B-2 very much.
@grimreapers
@grimreapers Год назад
Hi Tog x
@PilotPhotog
@PilotPhotog Год назад
Just saw this Cap!
@krzysztofoleksij
@krzysztofoleksij Год назад
B2 is still the best bomber today and its 30 years older than this thing, its going to be epic
@SaltyToSociety
@SaltyToSociety Год назад
Had a dream just 2 weeks ago of this exact aircraft flying just over head and it was so real. No intellect of any airplanes or jets. Then this just shows up randomly in my news feed 👀👀
@thomashenshallhydraxis
@thomashenshallhydraxis Год назад
I lived near Rosamond near Edwards AFB. I have seen it fly by while standing in yard. It really looks like a UFO, and it has a weird blue glow from engine area at night. It’s a really cool plane! I am retired military so I have base access also. Edwards is used as a testing base.
@bennieknape4857
@bennieknape4857 Год назад
I wish they would do a fly by at C.C. NAS that would be the coolest ever. Go Navy
@pole_barn_builder
@pole_barn_builder Год назад
I dont think it has flown yet. Only tested in virtual programs
@gogolocomotives9738
@gogolocomotives9738 Год назад
Reverse engineered UFO
@angelcarrion2042
@angelcarrion2042 Год назад
You haven't seen the B-21 flying.
@bennieknape4857
@bennieknape4857 Год назад
@@angelcarrion2042 who has?
@Jayclark41
@Jayclark41 Год назад
the B - 2 was soooo ahead of it's time pure stealth over performance , but dam even toay i don't know if 90% of the world armies can even pick up, the raider just amazing modernisation and rethinking of that air frame. you don't change a winning team
@erichkorman710
@erichkorman710 Год назад
Sooo ahead of its time it is hardly faster than stripped 747. You must remember when Serbia shot a B1 out of the sky with Soviet AA from the early 1970s. Or was that so ahead of it's time you hadn't heard about that? The B2 is a very latecopy of a German WW II bomber design almost 80 years old. Look it up if you want to talk about a plane ahead of its time.
@erichkorman710
@erichkorman710 Год назад
@@mandellorian790 if we only attack third-world countries like Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan we don't have to worry about radar but aircraft that slow can be brought down with simple anti-aircraft guns and some eyeballs.
@evl1536
@evl1536 Год назад
@@erichkorman710 You are slightly mistaken. Serbia (Yugoslavia) shot down not the B-2 but the F-117 and it was not in the 80s, but 1999, but it was shot down with the C-125 complex, this complex was released in 1961. About the shape of the fuselage. Yes, Germany had such a jet aircraft project in 1931 with a similar shape (flying wing) Horten Ho IX and even released several models (in 1942), but the fact is that physics is common to all and repetition of forms is normal. But yes, you are right that the US is not revolutionary here.
@user-ko2kx9oh4k
@user-ko2kx9oh4k Год назад
The B1 and B2 spirit bomber and the Knight hawk are my favourite aircraft they should be used in the transformer franchise as decipticons
@mattengler4145
@mattengler4145 Год назад
I see the b2 fly over my house all the time cant wait to see the b21 fly over next maybe both at the same time also my brother was at the unveiling and said it was pretty intense to see.
@marciacunningham5877
@marciacunningham5877 Год назад
Nice video, however, you didn't mention the Horton brothers who invented the flying wing in 1944-45. Michael
@jimmyfaherty8588
@jimmyfaherty8588 Год назад
apparently, as the world slept. The US has been working...
@alexanderrothschild3138
@alexanderrothschild3138 Год назад
VERY impressive 👍
@WhatDayIsItTrumpDay
@WhatDayIsItTrumpDay Год назад
Can't wait for this reveal this coming Friday. Gonna be very cool....I hope. 🤞 that it's not a disappointment. You know that the Military Industrial Complex gets a bad name among some people, but what they don't understand is that it is a great job program for highly qualified people who keep us all safer thru these high tech deterrents. I've been a military enthusiast since I was a little kid...probably 6 or 7 years old...I'm 49 now. I used to play with the little green Army Men in their Vietnam Era kit in the late 70s, in ditches and stuff around my neighborhood. We had this pond in our neighborhood where the owner cut a trench in the levee to drain it in like 77 or 78. So in the drainage ditches outside the pond, a lot of sentiment would build up along the bank, and that made for some pretty cool playing areas for Army Men. The trench in the levee also made a good playing area with the dirt mounds along the edge. By the time I was in Junior High in the mid 80s, some of my favorite books were military reference books. Modern Warplanes (c. 1982) was one of my favorites, hands down. It had full color side profiles of every active or recently retired military craft at that time. It included helicopters and large transport and refueling aircraft as well. The most modern aircraft in the book were early model Gen 4 craft...like F-15As, F/A-18s, F-16C, and F-14Ds. But it had everything going back to Gen 2 aircraft. Stuff like MiG-15s and 17s. All those Korean and Vietnam Era craft. But then in the 90s, I got another book that included the YF-22, YF-23, F-117 and B-2. Around this time I also got interested in tanks and other armored vehicles of both the modern era and WWII. Finding good books on those was a little more difficult. But I found a few good pocket reference books on tanks. I've looked around for similar books now and there's just not that much interest in that sort of thing now for some reason. It's almost like military equipment is taboo to talk about. But I feel that having a state of the art military is the greatest form of deterrent possible. As the old saying goes, "in order to secure peace...prepare for war." You'd rather have it, and not need it, than need it and not have it. The problems we ran into during Ops Iraqi Freedom and Enduring Freedon is that our thin skinned HUMVEES weren't set up for an insurgency type enemy where they'd use IEDs extensively. The military then developed MRAPs, but turns out that they weren't the best for the job either. We're now giving a bunch of them to the Ukrainians because we don't need them. Well anyway, hope that Friday's unveiling goes well, and it inspires people to get with the program again.
@Jr8uup
@Jr8uup Год назад
Great video, I've had my calendar marked for this reveal since I heard. One thing I always wonder is that they say it won't be in service for a few years but I wonder if that's true? I wonder if that's a smokescreen and they have a bunch ready to go?
@DOI_ARTS
@DOI_ARTS Год назад
This one pass on Philippine air space it was even photograph but US denied it. Its already operational just doing final testing
@xr4ti548
@xr4ti548 Год назад
The B-52 isn't sexy, but it is important to keep in service due to its unbeatable range and payload.
@larryc1616
@larryc1616 Год назад
It's instant death in today's war
@RobertsDigital
@RobertsDigital Год назад
It will be revealed in december the 2nd right? Will you show us the video? Anyways I have subbed to get notified!
@princessdeliabautista7498
@princessdeliabautista7498 11 месяцев назад
Amazing
@ME262MKI
@ME262MKI Год назад
If the B-2 is already almost unstoppable, can't imagine how OP the B-21 it's gonna be
@ltipst2962
@ltipst2962 Год назад
Remember what the average person knows, is a good few years after the original use expires.
@robw7381
@robw7381 Год назад
B-2 can be easily picked up by the S300 it has only ever been used as a standoff weapon giant waste of money
@themuckler8176
@themuckler8176 Год назад
Unstoppable against armies of goat herders with the Toyota Hilux and no air defenses
@Cleon851
@Cleon851 Год назад
@@robw7381 bahahahah the S300 can only detect it at around 5nm
@dancotterman1267
@dancotterman1267 Год назад
Not! It’s capable of getting much closer before it’s detected it’s not intended to be invisible. That gives very little time for defenses to react. It’s a deterrent and drone wingmen are far less costly and will fly with them. It’s the system it’s a big part of not just the plane.
@aaronstestlab
@aaronstestlab Год назад
Here are some B21 facts guaranteed to be correct: The project will come in over-budget. It will see little actual use. Some defense industry execs will make a bunch of money. Performance will be over-hyped and under-delivered. The contractor will miss deadlines and face no repercussions. It will be exorbitantly expensive to fly(mainly at air shows). The taxpayer will be on the hook for cost overruns.
@timebandit2951
@timebandit2951 Год назад
GRUMANN, ALWAYS ON POINT.
@David-wk6md
@David-wk6md Год назад
I already have one. I love it.
@Fuck_Snowflakes
@Fuck_Snowflakes Год назад
Should be painted in Vanta black to avoid letting the Chinese take detailed photos.
@piotrd.4850
@piotrd.4850 Год назад
I'm not sure how relatively sedate flight profile of Raider, reportedly designed as high-altitude only bomber, would benefit from variable cycle engine. In any case, I'd love to see B-2 converted to tankers for Raider.
@rayjames6096
@rayjames6096 Год назад
The US isn't going to pay the high cost of maintenence on a B-2 for use as a tanker.
@dgthe3
@dgthe3 Год назад
Unless a stealthy refueling boom can be made, stealthy tankers won't be a thing.
@rayjames6096
@rayjames6096 Год назад
That's not an issue obviously since the US is developing a stealth refueling drone to be put into service soon.
@MrMcbear
@MrMcbear Год назад
Well this is exciting.
@WHURobKip
@WHURobKip Год назад
Do we know if the unveiling is going to be streamed anywhere online?
@mikewaterfield3599
@mikewaterfield3599 Год назад
They did a crap job with the name. They even had a poll. I refuse to believe raider won. This is the Spirits Kid. Wraith, Reaper, ect. Make no bones about it she’s meant to be a more tactical application of the B2 and I’d wager she retains nuclear strike capability. Northrops dream is going modern.
@BullGator-kd6ge
@BullGator-kd6ge Год назад
We don’t want to sound like the baddies 😉 and “Raider” has some historical background so that’s kinda nice
@XxTheGreatDestroyerx
@XxTheGreatDestroyerx Год назад
I have to admit, “Wraith” would be a fucking sick name for a stealth bomber.
@mikewaterfield3599
@mikewaterfield3599 Год назад
@@BullGator-kd6ge yeah….. when the spirit was publicly admitted to she scared the hell out if everyone who rattled the saber at us.
@miletello1
@miletello1 Год назад
I personally like it when homage is paid to historically badass men.
@JakubKas
@JakubKas Год назад
Should've named it Frisbee
@stevenmosher4739
@stevenmosher4739 Год назад
watching the B2 rollout brought me to tears, as jack northrop was given a glimpse of the plane before he died.
@40datboysha
@40datboysha Год назад
Great looking airframe
@lakecountynaturalist7617
@lakecountynaturalist7617 Год назад
Can I pre-order? That bird is sweeeet!
@timbaskett6299
@timbaskett6299 Год назад
I could see a "new F-117" with profile contouring and advanced/improved aerodynamics, perhaps to replace or supplement the F-15E. Funny store, the B-2 helped me pass speech class. I did my final speech on why we needed the B-2.
@MrDJAK777
@MrDJAK777 Год назад
That's just a worse smaller b21. The f117 would need to grow otherwise it's tiny payload bays make it useless as a Stealth supplement to the f15ex as the f22 and f35 already are stealth and the ex's main purpose is to be missile trucks fed targeting data and fire control from both of those systems mainly to overcome the stealth payload constraint. but still better then the f117
@ruthnoya8424
@ruthnoya8424 Год назад
The F117 is a long obsolete design. All bomber money going forward is on the B21.
@illusions4559
@illusions4559 Год назад
I mean thats practically some of the new unmanned concepts/prototypes like the X-47
@DocWolph
@DocWolph Год назад
@@ruthnoya8424 You do realize he said "new F-177", as in they are not pulling the old plane out of mothballs, right? But that said, The NGAD and FA-XX will likely have bomber load outs as they are both supposed to have modularity in their designs, meaning they can be configured for bombing missions. In short, you are both right. the B-21 will get all, or most, of the bomber specific money. But there will also be a "new F117".
@timbaskett6299
@timbaskett6299 Год назад
@@MrDJAK777 I said "E", not "EX". Two different roles.
@meanman6992
@meanman6992 Год назад
Imagine if it also had at least 2 air to air weapons for its own defense. The new bomber may be stealthy enough to not be very visible to long wave radar…. So what if you can see it if you can’t lock it, unless you’re going to send fighters after it, but if you can’t even see it….. it’s more like how the general public tends to think of stealth vs reality
@dannypomeroy9255
@dannypomeroy9255 Год назад
The resin used in the flying wing alone was over 2k a gallon lol I remember when the Navy Airforce was there doing qualification trials we aways had more then 2 scores to run the wing skin lmao that chit ran great
@dannypomeroy9255
@dannypomeroy9255 Год назад
The tecnolagy used now is crazy in carbon materials and it's going to be a race in development of AI controlling a flying wing yup it will be manless in 20 yrs
@szymonwojcik7608
@szymonwojcik7608 Год назад
Super !!! 😁😄😉👍
@Grumman-8k
@Grumman-8k Год назад
I can’t wait to buy one
@androidmxq2854
@androidmxq2854 Год назад
Looking forward to seeing the Raider "beast" roll out onto the tarmac 👍 hope the Air force put on a good unveiling 🛫
@valentinexavier9278
@valentinexavier9278 Год назад
Based on the last Air Force rendering, the B-21 is going to look so crazy. The cockpit glass is full WTF in an awesome way. And it isn't black like the other stealth bombers. It's either a daylight bomber or it's painted anti-flash white or it could be both.
@justinhowell8484
@justinhowell8484 Год назад
Probably white or chrome to help defeat the new gen flir systems. Allegedly china has developed marketed improvements on those systems.
@3dagedesign
@3dagedesign Год назад
Compare this to the Horten Gotha 229 from 1944
@pilongaracing8902
@pilongaracing8902 Год назад
@mandellorian790 You have to read and inform a lot more about this subject, you have mixed and erroneous concepts. First of all there is not anything you can't detect, this technologies are developed for being Harder to detect, not undetectable.
@valentinexavier9278
@valentinexavier9278 Год назад
@mandellorian new gen FLIR cannot detect it either
@davidmoss2576
@davidmoss2576 Год назад
This is a badass platform
@seanusa6663
@seanusa6663 Год назад
It’s just beautiful ❤
@VectorGhost
@VectorGhost Год назад
I feel like the b1 bomber has a lot of life left in it. But never got any good upgrades
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer Год назад
Variable geometry means a lot of heavy dead weight, it isn’t stealthy, and it isn’t that fast. For interdiction missions strike fighters are a better choice, for penetration missions it’s suicidal compared to stealthier options, and it offers nothing special as a cruise missile carrier where the simple B-52 is the practical choice.
@Yuki_Ika7
@Yuki_Ika7 Год назад
i like the possibility of turning it into a Missile truck, i think the proposal was called the B-1R or something, i am sure they will find more uses for it (at least to extend it's life while waiting for more B-21s)
@danielross1340
@danielross1340 Год назад
@@Yuki_Ika7 Yes, the B1r never was that seriously considered but the B1r would have gotten f119 engines out of the raptor and some small tweaks to lower its RCS. With 4 f119 engines and a payload of 75,000 pound it would be an awesome missile truck. The grim reapers built one in DCS recently if you want to see what it might look like in combat
@dizzyizzie6354
@dizzyizzie6354 Год назад
@@Justanotherconsumer whoa hold on now, that isn't quite fair to say. The B-1A was the DAS , AI (tac & strategic), SAC/SEAD, nuclear weapons delivery penetrator. The B-1B was as a more conventional IAA/ strike- x -fighter with large payload comparable to most penetrators. But only a penetrator in the sense of highly contested AI missions like / SEAD/ DAS / CAS .. I think the simplistic use similar to f(b)-111 was appropriate. Seeing as the f-111 did so well across all roles , missions , regions. Cost an complexity isn't all that different. Variable geometry wing aircraft get alot of hate, unjustified in my opinion. Some of the GOAT in attack/fighter/bomber/electronics/High altitude SR. so a larger aircraft shouldn't be much different. Either way a b52 can't get in and out of contested airspace with less then Air superiority fighters / awcs / EW / KC. Even if it could it would be a standoff launch. I would love to see it sub 1000ft, at night, striking targets an supporting troops
@Nathan-ry3yu
@Nathan-ry3yu Год назад
I think the B2 would have over the years. But the B21 will be made from better materials and possibly be Faster. I don't think they will retire the B2s dispite having B21 not in a hurry anyway.
Далее
Insane Speed and Power: The B-1 Lancer Story
19:19
Просмотров 1,3 млн
МЕГА ФОКУС С КАЛЬКУЛЯТОРОМ
00:33
J-31 The Forgotten 5th Gen Fighter
15:15
Просмотров 111 тыс.
How does a Tank work? (M1A2 Abrams)
9:49
Просмотров 54 млн
Next Level Helicopters Unveiled
9:30
Просмотров 3,3 млн
The Insane Engineering of the SR-71 Blackbird
18:55