The Battle for Moscow AGRESSION, Part One | WAR MOVIE 

yes

Hola from Russia❤

Bueno, bueno... los aliados no fueron mejores, 3 millones de bengalíes asesinados por los piratas, por ejemplo...

In 1941, Hitler was sober and took the winter and the long, unstable supply chain into consideration, made the Axis armies fell back and fortify instead of push forward. A year later, as if he had been a totally different leader: he complete lost it in frustration caused by his own impatience.

@@lxathu No, don't act like he made wise decisions in 1941. They greatly miscalculated the winter, supply, Soviet resistance, etc.

@@internetperson8638 Of course, Barbarossa was built on rubbish reconnaissance and ignored the widening feature of the SU. But at least, he could adopt to the current situation in 41. But lost it later.

@@lxathu He could because of the momentum and the fact that it took the soviets a bit to reorganize.

Just like the Ukrainians have stopped the Russians short of Kyiv a month ago

We can see how history repeats itself

Wow, I guess you are not one whose focus is easily distracted by magicians. I didn't notice it watching at the collapsing buildings and the folks around. Nice catch.

What's the best Russian War movie? I enjoy them is why I'm asking, would like some recommendations.

@@remy12 hi! There are a lot of Russian war movies! I would call Russia world champion of war movies! I do not like Russian “Hollywood” stile moves! I like the Russian Russian war movies! Start with Liberation sequel ! It is epic super production of 5 movies made fro late 60’s till mid 70’s! It still look good! There are many American, British, German and Italian actors in it , because it shows different angles of the war! Music is insane!

@@remy12 Some more: “The Brest fortress” and “Panfilov’s 28”! “Battle of Sevastopol” and “Stalingrad”!

@@steveiliev8912 Thanks! I will check those out for sure!

I mean it was definitely a choice to leave out the non aggression pact they signed with Germany before they both invaded Poland lol.

Stalin should have acted on Sorge's warning about Hitler's boys invading, eventually giving the exact date... along with warnings by a lot of others. The man never had a problem with getting millions of "his people" killed. Sorge must have been the slyest spy ever.

@@robertsmith2227 Agreed. The Red Army was likely to march all the way to the Atlantic Wall if the Aliies didn't launch the D-Day invasion. Some in the US think Lend Lease "saved" the Soviets. That's a reach. The total cost of Lend Lease to the US was about 50 Billion of which about 40 went to the Uk and 11 went to the USSR. That 11 Billion was just a few percent of Soviet military expenditures during WW2. I think they could have managed without Lend Lease, but the task would have been much more challenging if the British and US didn't keep some of the Wehrmacht busy with bombing and the initiatives in Africa and Italy.. We saw what the Red Army could do in 1945 in Manchuria. They were so effective that the US decided to drop the big ones to keep them from taking over in Korea and in the north islands of Japan.

Hitler underestimated his enemies (US & USSR) and over estimated his allies (Italy & Japan) Wermacht was a one trick pony, relying solely on quick strike victory with weapons they had "on the shelf". Once quick strike failed, as in USSR, it became a war of attrition that Germany was not suited for. could not replace tanks and men faster than the soviets. dumbass. even with a shitty plan going in, he almost made it, except for shitty decisions he made on the way. being led by a corporal.

@@danielkokal8819 No doubt that Germany had to win a quick victory. They could never match the Allies resources and production. As for Hitler, he had both contempt and disdain for his enemies. He actually believed his own "Master Race" rhetoric.

Hitler need diesel fuel. And lots of it. Then maybe the war would have been different

Barbarossa had some success, but it's a mistake to think it went according to plan. In reality, from the very first days, the plans of the Germans and their allies cracked. The defeat of Germany would have been predetermined if the Western Allies really wanted to defeat Germany with all their might. Already in 1942, the superiority of the forces of the anti-Hitler coalition was 3 to 1 compared to the Axis, and it was very easy to end the war already in 1942. But it was beneficial for the Allies to wait until the Nazis and the Soviets killed each other, and at that time to accumulate forces themselves in order to at the moment of the maximum weakening of the Nazis and the Soviets, to spare for themselves all the fruits of the Soviet victory, using the capabilities of their maximum increased military strength, and the impossibility of the exhausted Soviets to win a new war immediately after the end of the previous war, if the Soviets do not agree with the Anglo-American dominance in the post-war world. The only factor why the West did not conclude an alliance with Germany against the USSR before the end of the war was the need for the help of the USSR against Japan. There are lies in the West about the allegedly decisive moral impact of nuclear bombings. This is complete nonsense. Even despite the fact that sooner or later Japan would most likely capitulate to the United States, but this would require the United States too much time, human and material losses. The entry of the USSR into the war became a factor that the United States needed. And also the liquidation of the Comintern. This is the only reason why a separate peace and an alliance with any fascist government in Germany after the liquidation of Hitler (the liquidation of Hitler was necessary for the public opinion of the West, the fascist system itself suited the West perfectly) were not put into practice, despite the Crossword and Sunrise operations. The thing is that the USSR had to defeat not only Germany, but also Japan.

use ad block

use an ad blocker and you wont see ads

No problems with RU-vid Premium!

Courageous side show!

...and what exactly would that be...?

@@pawelsawicki1750 The end of Hitlerism.

Yes. It does. The fighting on the Eastern front made the war in the West look like a mere sideshow, and the sacrifice and horror the Soviet people endured should never be forgotten.

Considering what happened in 2016 I’m gonna say Nah

For WHAT?? Spreading communism worldwide? We defeated the wrong enemy

No.

Dont look too good now lol

причем тут совок и княжество литовское? это просто агрессия по отношению к польше в союзе с гитлером

As a Hungarian you should be deeply ashamed about the roles fascist Hungary, dictatorship Poland and Germany played in shameful destruction of Czechoslovakia.

@@buxtehude123 LOL, that part he will be silent on.

Russia is not the USSR unfortunately((

Well,they did reintroduce Pavlov's case in later "War on the western direction" from 1990,with quite a gruesome details concerning his torture by Beria.

Agree

At the time, the government of Poland could bot be located. Through no channels could anyone speak to Polish leadership. It was later found out that much of the government along with the president of Poland, had fled to Romania. President Moscicki, being the only president of Poland, and also interned in Romania, left Poland without leadership. He could not hand down any orders, any political action while in Romania. In effect - Both legally by international law, and literally, by the conditions existing in Poland, Poland was no longer a state. It had no government. President and his government had made their way into Romania as early as September 15th, where they were interned. In International law, if a government is interned in another country, it can take no political action. It can not function as a government. (Romania was neutral in the war, so to have the Polish government in their borders handing down orders to the Polish army fighting the Germans would have made them no longer neutral.) On September 17th, the Red Army entered Poland. That day Supreme Commander of the Polish military Smigly gave an order to all Polish troops. "The Soviets have invaded. My orders are to carry out the retirement into Romania and Hungary by the shortest roots. Do not engage the Soviets in military actions, only in the event of disarming our units by them. ... Units whose position the soviets have approached should negotiate with them with the aim of the exit of the garrison into Romania or Hungary." A state of war did not exist between the Poland and the USSR in 1939. To fire on the Soviets was illegal, and insubordination. On September 18th the soviets told the united states that the intention of their military action was to "protect minorities in the areas of Poland where there is no government." By September 24th, no action had been taken by any Polish-allied state to declare the USSR hostile to Poland, and their neutrality in the conflict was at that time recognized universally. Only by September 30th had the first stirrings of a Polish government in exile under General Sikorski begun in France. Poland was without a government for atleast 15 days, and had the soviets not secured the area, the Germans surely would have.

@@warsaw1548 Male Bovine Excrement 🐃💩 The ussr and germany had in august, with the ribbentrop/molotov pact, agreed to invade and divide Poland.

then how about uk and france which signed treaty in 1938 handing over land in czechoslovakia to germany? not to mention poland and hungry also getting land from czechoslovakia at the same time. also land poland lost 1939 to ussr was and isn't polish land, but poland occupied it after ww1. almost all of it is now in belorus and ukraine.

At the time, the government of Poland could bot be located. Through no channels could anyone speak to Polish leadership. It was later found out that much of the government along with the president of Poland, had fled to Romania. President Moscicki, being the only president of Poland, and also interned in Romania, left Poland without leadership. He could not hand down any orders, any political action while in Romania. In effect - Both legally by international law, and literally, by the conditions existing in Poland, Poland was no longer a state. It had no government. President and his government had made their way into Romania as early as September 15th, where they were interned. In International law, if a government is interned in another country, it can take no political action. It can not function as a government. (Romania was neutral in the war, so to have the Polish government in their borders handing down orders to the Polish army fighting the Germans would have made them no longer neutral.) On September 17th, the Red Army entered Poland. That day Supreme Commander of the Polish military Smigly gave an order to all Polish troops. "The Soviets have invaded. My orders are to carry out the retirement into Romania and Hungary by the shortest roots. Do not engage the Soviets in military actions, only in the event of disarming our units by them. ... Units whose position the soviets have approached should negotiate with them with the aim of the exit of the garrison into Romania or Hungary." A state of war did not exist between the Poland and the USSR in 1939. To fire on the Soviets was illegal, and insubordination. On September 18th the soviets told the united states that the intention of their military action was to "protect minorities in the areas of Poland where there is no government." By September 24th, no action had been taken by any Polish-allied state to declare the USSR hostile to Poland, and their neutrality in the conflict was at that time recognized universally. Only by September 30th had the first stirrings of a Polish government in exile under General Sikorski begun in France. Poland was without a government for atleast 15 days, and had the soviets not secured the area, the Germans surely would have.

Территория на которую вступило СССР никогда не было Польшей это територии западной Украины и белоруси захваченные Польшей в результате советско польской войны 1920 года . На этих территориях всегда проживали белорусы и украинцы . В средние века эта территория называлось великое княжество литовское. Польша находится западнее

И как американец Генри Форд строил в германии заводы.

😢😢 когда снимался этот фильм ещё не было ни какой компьютерной графики

отcтябись.кишка

If not to mention Soviet occupation of Poland and the Baltic states. The winter war was also omitted, though Soviet heavy losses convinced Hitler that the Red Army was no match....

they make comrade stalin look such a kindly old fellow

@@ascott6328 well better Than Hitler who always had bipolar attack,also Stalin were close to Gen Zhukov, not like Hitler who has nobody except maybe Eva'

Не только СССР заключал договор с Германией, и Польша сотрудничала с нацистской Германией до поры до времени, как и другие страны Европы. Но про это вы не вякните, потому что нужно найти крайних.

Your beloved Poland invaded the RSFSR first, clown

They haven’t dubbed the German. There is just the voice over, you can hear the original German underneath.

No mention of it is this film...or in any of the Mosfilm movies about WW2.

You remember this, but not the coming of the Nazis?

@@steveburton9242 I remember that the Brits and French participated in Munich Agreement: "Peace in our times", wel, well, well

@@walterweiss7124 attempting to secure peace, just 20 years after unspeakable bloodbath, is wrong? Only night makes right? Oh well, the red flag flew over Berlin.

@@steveburton9242 attempting to secure peace, at the cost of other nations, as usual

Neither there were german tanks with russian caterpillars Christie-type as it appears on the movie.

This IS the original version, Soviet way.....

Во-первых, Польша была против защиты Чехословакии от гитлеровской Германиии, поляки вполне дружили с нацистами, пока они не напали на саму Польшу. Во-вторых, 5 миллионов кулаков - это ложь, откуда вы берете такие цифры? И в третьих, кулаки - это не фермеры, это по сути капиталистическая мафия, эксплуатировавшая крестьян. Большевики поступили с кулаками справедливо.

Mmmm. Politicians. Well - I have some shocking news for u Mr Zig Zog. Politicians are people - just exactly like u and me. Sometimes they lie. Sometimes they drink and drive. Sometimes they have sex with someone they shouldn't. Sometimes they fiddle their taxes. Yep - they are just like you and me. It's gross hypocracy to demand that politicians must, once elected, somehow become better than the rest of us. Mr ZigZog ... if u can do a better job than politicians, all u have to do is get yourself elected, and we can all stand back and watch you transform the world. Or maybe not ...

@@toytoy1091 What an interesting specimen! Let us have a dissection. First up, and a red flag, is your attempt to ascribe values to someone else that you do not know. We could leave it here because of the logic that you do no know me and cannot say (you can think it as every Untermensch has the right) what someone else's values are. Not a good start. Second, the deliberate misspelling of my name is infantile. Really, is that your best shot? I acknowledge if there is a wit in it then maybe you can let it go - for example referring to Donald Trump as Rump because of his unfortunate physical characteristic. But here?? Third, this concept of becoming a politician is a non-sequitur. To explain it terms that you might grasp: Imagine I (or you, or anyone for that matter) do not like cornflakes. We have our reasons (carbs, processing, seed oils). So we express our doubts. It is not coherent to expect a critic to change professions to 'solve the world' from cornflakes. I suspect you will be a little slow (or unwilling) to grasp the inanity of this idea. Let us have another example: You do not like the play of a footballer - it is plain daft to expect the critic to replace that footballer. Flies do need to be swatted.

@@zogzog1063 Mr Zig Zog, I understand your concerns. But what if you're a famous footballer, and flies land on your cornflakes? Should you expect politicans to remove the flies, or ban footballers from eating cornflakes ?

Так нам удобнее.

Petlyakov Pe-2...?

@@Lassisvulgaris Naah,it's some Czech trainer aircraft. Still at least it somewhat resembles BF-110.

@@kaletovhangar Thanks. I stand corrected.....

@@Lassisvulgaris It´s czech aerotaxi L-200 Morava.

@@myguitarjoe Thanks.....

Well,you go find a fleet of preserved Pz.IIs,IIIs and IVs in 1980s.Not too bad of job, although for much more modern movie like Dnieper line from 2009 they did make a good replicas of Pz.III on top of BMP-1.

This is a MOVIE< stooopid Tony

Any mention of the soviet invasion of Poland as agreed between Stalin and Hitler.

General Pavlov reminds the viewers at around 26:00 minutes about non-aggression pact.

@@kaletovhangar But not about the fact that the Soviet Union had also made a deal with the Fascists to split Poland up between them.

@@robashton8606 Yeah, that was omitted,but they admited it with mentioning of old border in the movie.It wasn't something unknown in USSR that Soviets took Eastern half of Poland in 1939, it's just that they mention only German Aggression around which the movie is centered.

if you want to bring that up, why not mention uk and france which signed treaty in 1938 handing over land in czechoslovakia to germany? not to mention poland and hungry also getting land from czechoslovakia at the same time. also land poland lost 1939 to ussr was and isn't polish land, but poland occupied it after ww1. almost all of it is now in belorus and ukraine.

Without madman Hitler there would have been no war!

Germany was clearly going to expand. It had already annexed Austria in 1938. So we be 100% certain that the Molotov Ribbentrop agreement in 1939 would have altered their ambitions?

Ha-ha! You know shit! There were recent findings from Alexandrian library files proving it was all Stalin and the Russians ! There was never Hitler ! Hitler was creation of the soviet propaganda machine! Also Stalin had sex with Putin’s mother! It is proven! They still have the condom! You know evil never sleeps! That is because it always have sex! ……… Before You make statements check the recent sources updates! Happy new Year Pall ! 🍻

then how about uk and france which signed treaty in 1938 handing over land in czechoslovakia to germany? not to mention poland and hungry also getting land from czechoslovakia at the same time. also land poland lost 1939 to ussr was and isn't polish land, but poland occupied it after ww1. almost all of it is now in belorus and ukraine.

@@sitting_nut the land given to Germany is usually considered as "appeasement" to them to prevent war. Many borders for countries are decided during/after war. Should the land that Poland got be considered differently? Does getting land via a previous war justify invading a country over?

​@@whater39 ignorant and irrational much? land poland lost to ussr was illegally occupied. it was not polish. belorussians lived there . that is why it was , and will not, come back to poland ever . unlike most of the lands poland lost to germeny . brest was part of land ussr got. and was the 1st thing germany attacked when invading ussr( as depicted in movie) .its still in belorus and not poland . justly and rightly so .. uk and france were trying to create a war between germany ( and facist regimes in central europe ) against ussr without involving themselves. that is why they were willing to appease germany ( and poland and hungry ) by allowing czechoslovakian n lands to be occupied and did not respond( literally) to stalin's request for an alliance which he was looking for from early 30s. it was only after munich treaty that russian foreign commissar litvinov who was jewish, and who was responsible for seeking alliance with uk and france, was dismissed and replaced with molotov so a treaty can be made with germany.

Petain, c'est vous ?

Pawel , if not for the USSR Poland wouldnt exist today, so a little bit of gratitude would be in order. Yes, they committed a heinous crime in Katyn, but it is not like Russians and Poles have not been killing each other for centuries. You can cry, yell and moan, but if Germany had won you wouldn even be alive now.

@@astrolillo You are one who is crying and begging for acknowledgement and gratefulness, so stop twisting and distorting of reality (stop propaganda:) ). If USA wouldn't send ammunition, cars, tanks, boats, bikes, food, drugs, weaponry and whatnot, today German languague would have been an official languague over up to Ural. And I encourage you to familiarize yourself as to the subject of what plans German officials have had for Poland, then start to bark at the trees around you... What difference does it make if country is occupied by germans or russians (like parts of Ukraine lately, i.e.)? Go back to your cave and don't forget to turn the volume in your kolchoz radio up, so you can better hear from spikers, what's good for you and what world looks like, for I don't think you will ever be able to think for yourself. :) P.S. What amuses me the most is that you really believe in what you say:) We need people like you, so keep growing ;)

Please name of the movie

Don’t know much about history but still will make a fool of myself on the internet. Keep bringing pearls of your wisdom!

@@pawelpap9 if there is any thing that is not factual in what i said, why don't you specify that..cravenly hiding behind vague words, like you did , is resort of those who know they have no valid case .

People are only pointing out the way this film made a point of the Western treaty with the Germans, whilst completely glossing over the Soviet attempts to appease the Fascists. Wind your neck in. You're making a bit of a tit of yourself. Again.

​@@robashton8606 you know you have no case hence your name calling and insults. what "soviet attempts to appease the fascists" are you talking about? be specific . here are the facts - in 1939 ussr reclaimed lands illegally occupied by poland after ww1 (which remain outside poland in belorus and ukraine, and are not claimed by current poland), after poland in 1938 joined other fascists in germany and hungry to invade and occupy lands in czechoslovakia, with blessing of uk and france, who were seeking to spark a war between ussr and germany. why should they "gloss over" that fact? in movie both german dictator and others mention the relationship that exist between ussr and germany before the invasion of ussr. face facts, instead of trying to mindlessly parrot the western propaganda. learn to think critically.

@@sitting_nut Signing a non aggression pact is, by definition, appeasement. You really _aren't_ very bright, are you?

Плохому танцору.... поможет хороший хирург.

@missions Are you being sarcastic? Why?

Watch Come and See. Its on this youtube channel. Greatest war film ever made, generally agreed with by anybody with a brain

Cina-numero uno

I loved the moment when the young soldier reacted to the tanks coming out of the river, and the Muskovian Girl realizing the Pink Clouds where the asbestos filling of her friends and families houses. Thrilling stuff.

Да, мой польский брат. Именно так! ✊