The Beatles Live in Australia [60fps] 

Thanks

What? They excluded I want to hold you hand & a hard days night... and played covers instead? They were good enough even in that early time to have a full Beatle track listing. I would have substituted Long Tall Sally and Till there was you for the upper mentioned.

QQ P

@@leopoldocarabez8809 cry about it.

One of the best banda

This is but one reason that I'm glad I'm as old as I am. It was a great time to be a teenager. The world will never be the same.....

I was in early middle school in Georgia when I first heard that foot-stomping jazz-run bass played by Paul in All My Loving. In older age more than 50 years later, I still rejoice to the beat that woke me up to a new musical beginning!❤

Hasta noviembre de 1966...

@@franciscoP.R._pro1983Excluding the rooftop performance

Absolutely: I saw an interview with Hall & Oates recently that was their comment.

Even without Ringo in few songs

BANZEI!

The whole was greater than the sum. They just reached a higher level together.

Без почти. Чисто Божий промысел.

BANZEI!

Absolutely. Just easy to see where everyone else tries to merely emulate what they did. Just crazy to think by the time they were my age, they'd been to America twice and were world famous already

Thats debatable

Not even close!

爬虫類とバンザイをファック！

Amen

Do you mean long live the two who are still alive?

As usual, the cause of separation was a woman...Yoko Ono.

Absolutely. Without question the greatest band ever. They made a lot of enemies of the people they put out of work because they changed everything. And the Beatles only got better. They caught hell for the Lennon "religion" comment, and they got even better. They were a once in a 100 year cultural phenomenon.

@@petezereeeah Dude. Only a Boomer would consider them to be the "greatest band ever." Most people, including me, think they suck ass.

Hello 👋 The Beatles is a great group,did a lot of great songs,may John Lennon RIP

Hard to believe it must be 50 years ago.

Wiiinaauuu WOM.

Terrific memories of yours with this Fab4....!!!!

No doubt they were and always will be the greatest band of all time. They start with love me do ,and she loves you, to Helter Skelter,. And Revolution, took Do Wop to it's grave,shaped rock and roll into what it is today.great writers too.

Not even close!

They are so great it doesn't even seem real.

They came at a time when, especially in America, we needed something. Kennedy assassination, Buddy Holly's death, Presley being MIA, Southeast Asia starting to get our attention, all played a part in us looking at them as an escape from these thoughts. Plus, this was quite different from anything anybody over here could offer.

Because of technology there will never be another Frank Sinatra, Elvis, Beatles or Michael Jackson,yes he also was a game changer like him or not.Not everyone liked Beatles or Elvis,millions but that is not everyone, not even close.just sayin

What haters?

I was always more of a Stones guy but, you can't deny the Beatles were great in their own right. This performance proves it.

@@sabbracadabra8367 what haters?

You know even in Brazil with poor rock music. We have Beatles haters . Best band ever

You see Beatles is like bts back in the day thats why they have so many haters

Me too, I love all four ones so much because of that as another reason

That's Brian Epstein's idea

What can ya 'say,huh!!! The very best has just been played!!!!! That's why!!

Have you seen the Meet the Beatles album cover?..it's described as the butcher album..your fab 4 all have dismembered little babies on there laps covered with blood and raw meat...and there wearing white smocks like butchers ...it was the first album released in America

@@randyjohnson805 That is not the kind of life the Beatles led or who they were as individuals. In my opinion their flaw was that they aided and abetted the drug culture.

@@samualcrocket1405 Paul talked about taking acid..I seen a video of the band smoking weed in new York...in the 60s I don't think it was possible to score acid and it not come straight from uncle Sam...easy to find reports of Lennon and heroin addiction

I'm watching some live pink Floyd to get this bull shit off my mind..Floyd is better in every conceivable way

@@randyjohnson805 Ha ha

The best band is Queen😎👌

@@gustavoramirez1310 no

@@gustavoramirez1310 TOP 10 , not the 1-st

@@gustavoramirez1310 No, Queen no le aportó casi nada nuevo a la música, Los Beatles fueron quienes innovaron nuevas cosas, por algo Los Beatles son la banda con mas discos vendidos en la historia (1.2 billones de ventas), en cambio Queen ni siquiera llega a las 300 millones de ventas... Un saludo :D

@@gustavoramirez1310 Even if Queen is a good band, you can't compare it with the Beatles. They are the Kings 😀

Лучшая группа 20-ого столетия!

@@user-tx1ec6ln4z ...следующая Пинк Флойд (на мой взгляд) но да!!

@@dexterkarpoff1442 я спорить с вами не буду.Их столько групп прекрасных,что!..

@@dexterkarpoff1442 Величайшая группа 20го века признана всеми критиками, экспертами, опросами-это Пинк Флойд.

The stopped quite some time ago.

And no auto tune

Well said! The Fab Four were and still are simply GODS!!!

The experience they got in Hamburg

And without stage monitors.

Yes Yes Yes, or should we say, Yea, Yea, Yea

Ну Роллиг Стоунз на сцене тоже будь здоров!

Love the live stuff they did up through ‘66

True enough, but it kinda wrecked the end of maybe the best version they ever did of Long Tall Sally..

@@douggray8557 Doug, check out NME Awards show 64 or 65 (both up ) just watch!

Un gran concierto, me gustan las voces armoniosas, prinicipalmente John Lennon

I would be horrified if this person was a thug. I feel like the security of the staff is lax.

So Lennon could focus on all those triplets in the rhythm guitar.

George and Paul sounded very good together.

It was my high school days when i heard the beatles awesome n enjoyable moments..love it

Brilliant, Brilliant, Brilliant

THEY WERE GOOD UNTIL THEY CAME UP WITH YELLOW SUBMARINE AFTER THAT THEY LOST ME AND THE STONES BECAME MY FAVORITE

@@roysigler4814 I was a big Stones fan, but after Jones died they mostly lost their way, apart from a few bright spots. Never listen to them, but the Beatles I do. If the Beatles had recorded as a group into the 70s, they would have been even bigger, if that is possible, with the quality and quantity of songs that came from the four.

Gary, будьте здоровы. С любовью из России. С любовью к the Beatles! 👍👍🎼

I was 13 too in 1963, but I prefered The Kinks and Joan Baez... Ensuite j'ai adoré les Beatles 😀😀😀🇨🇵🇨🇵

Saw them Live in Belfast 1963 Kings Hall.....when I was 13years old.My dearly departed Mum&Dad bought me the Ticket which cost 15shillings(Decimal...75pence!!).We came from a fairly poor Working Class area then and that would have been a sacrifice fòr them to spend that sort of money....which to be honest I never have thought about until recently!!

@@douglasmasterson443 Just to get an idea and perspective, how much would 15 shillings/75 p decimal be in todays money? Or, what could one buy for that amount in the UK in 1963?

Vous étiez probablement un fan de Dick Rivers !

Мне 70 лет Битлз любовь всей моей жизни

I'd say the best. Picture, audio mix and the band itself. Stars aligned for this concert

Still not sure if the Beatles were real or a dream...maybe both?

Well said. Incredibly tight and in tune. Raw talent honed by hundreds of live performances to that point.

Does anyone know what year this was recorded?

⁠@@dannync951964

Led Zeppelin to me just out does Beatles in every aspect.

@@lastfewtokes haha

Definitely....and John now gone for 40 years...😥

Mrs Bee, play with Words, but the Bee Gees or the Brothers Gibb were also big song writers. Consider that they start writing songs during their child hood, 1963 when Robin and Maurice was in the age of 14 and Barry 16/17. They wrote the last songs together in 2001 before Maurice died in 2003. A period of writing of nearly 40 years. In addition the brothers wrote songs for a lot of other artist, from Marmalade to Diana Ross, Dolly Parton and others. This will not downgrade the Beatles and their success, but they are not the "best" alone.

It is an interesting comparison to make between The Beatles and The Bee Gees. I saw The Beatles at their Brisbane concert in 1964 and can remember seeing The Bee Gees on the local TV station when they were kids. As far as “who was better” The Beatles concerts in that year have no comparison. As far as contribution to music I would give it to The Bees Gees. We are only now beginning to realise the immense contribution to music that they have made over those 40 years. They are in a class all on their own.

Da

Каждому своё

Масяна .Они самые Лучшие и самые Красивые .

Я слушаю их с 1969 года, это моя первая обалденная любовь, через всю жизнь.

@@Max-qb1ym .

Hello 👋 The Beatles is a great group,did a lot of great songs,may John Lennon RIP

А В ЧЁМ ИХ ГЕНИАЛЬНОСТЬ? Голос есть, но тексты и музыка примитивные. Никогда не нравилось и не слушал.

​@@user-ym3cj9xx3f все гениальное просто

​@@user-ym3cj9xx3fна поздних альбомах нет, начиная с Rubber Soul.

It never will fade

Базара нет Так и есть

A pity, John’s solo is not filmed!

Agreed also one of their most overlooked tunes.

Ya excellent!!!

Great story. Thanks. I would like to know more! What was your father's job?

​@@damienlott - My father worked for "DR" (Denmark Radio)which was established around 1925 with radio broadcasts and also in 1956 with the advent of TV, yet it was still called "DR" and now included TV. They now hired a bunch of young WizKids to staff the TV side and my father was hired about the age of 23. He was eventually made the superintendent of Dubbing, which is the audio side of TV. He also made some movies around this time as recording engineer and recorded a number of famous acts that came to Denmark. When The Beatles did that one-off concert in 1964, my father was basically in charge of the audio side. In terms of quality, let's be blunt about it, the sound simply had to be captured for the audio and TV, not great really and nothing to be proud about. But it was quite an event. In 1965 we immigrated to Australia and while my Dad went back and between 1967 and 1970 and went back and again worked for DR, here in Sydney he ended up working for ABC, the Australian equivalent to BBC and DR. He died prematurely at end of 1974. I wonder if I should reveal his name... Palle Kai Rasmu.... most would likely not have read to the end. ;) I take back any claim that this might have been the first time The Beatles was recorded to live TV. This had already been done in America on the Ed Sullivan Show a few months earlier and a much better job sound-wise, to be honest. The KB Hall was an atrocious place, KB being a football club with a hall that was used. Acoustics? What acoustics? :-( BTW Carlos, do you live in Denmark?

@@D800Lover very cool

Or just have talent.

@@justincredible. talent is not enough to reach this level, they spent thousands of hours play gigs live before became famous

I actually had a dog that is almost as old as the youngest Beatle, George. He (George...not the dog) happened to be 8 years older than me...and I remember as I delivered my newspapers at 5 AM (15-16 years old) thinking of this guy 24 years old.....my peers and I ..we KNEW we were seeing something never seen before. Then, in April of 1964 ( my start of my paper route) they held down the top 5 spots... The Beatles ( along with all the other groups and their ground-breaking music) were like a life raft, carrying us across the stormy seas of adolescence. Groups of us ( 5-10) would gather around a campfire, or in someone's basement...and listen, parse, interpret, and sing along. As the 60s rolled on, the music took a decided political turn, and then there was even MORE parsing and interpreting. Suddenly, a gradual drift of music that you absolutely MUST listen to. You HAD to pay attention to the words. Yes....sudden..and gradual. It was a time where the kids were scratching their heads as much as the adults. Just for different reasons. This seemed to me to be the birth of the concept that in America...dissent WAS the MOST Patriotic thing you could do. I find it astonishing that for the most part, todays youth is squarely in the corner of the Deep State, the Establishment, the Warmongers, the Government Over-reach..anticipating the next trampling of our God-given rights by these tyrants. Frame-jobs, election theft, UnConstitutional mandates that leave todays kids so sad these lawless laws have been ruled...well, lawless. I feel shame to my core of being because it is MY offspring, and MY grandchildren who have abandoned the principles of self-rule, local power, Constitutional guarantees, and the simple Constitutional mandate that, should something NOT be specifically mentioned as a power of the Federal Government, it was, and always was, a power of the individual state. That silly Congressman threatening to destroy the filibuster, destroy the SCOTUS if they don't get their way.... which is the destruction of the 2nd amendment. These people aren't nutty, or insane, or loopy. No, my friends...I really am sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but this is exactly what they(Democrats) WANT!. This is their plan..has been for the last few decades. They have been planning, plotting and implementing the total destruction of the America we know and love. So far we have been compliccit, and at times , willing supporters of this arson of the Constitution. Love you my Patriots.

They credited their ability to do all that to the fact they played venues like the Cavern where noise was part of the culture.

Check out Mary Lou by the Creative Force, amazing !

Hey Rod...It was also the 8 hour per night 6 nights per week gigs they played in Hamburg. Paul's playing chops were better than most (as were J&G&R), due to the bands amazing workload. They all acknowledged that the German experience made the band tight. As John said "some of our best work was never recorded" :) .

Not being a musician I’ve never noticed...wow...such talent

not even looking at his bass on "all my loving" is even more insane !

John even said their best performances were during their Hamburg days

I’ll never understand how he could play that pulsating, aggressive bass in “ I saw her standing there” and “ Long, Tall Sally” , sing at the same time and never lose a beat or note!!.. just sheer talent!!

Манкес тоже неплохие Кстати учителя Битлз

Как Вы Правы .До сих пор слушаю как будто в первый раз .

S

Cd 100)11¹) liquids by

Cd 100)11¹) liquids by

What bouts U2?There music was awesum,but cant compete with the Beatles.Never saw their concerts but went to a re-creation concert.It was average.

@@catlover59 U2 was good till Zooropa, included. Afterwards thet went down hill. But i like all the albums till Zooropa.

What instrument do you play professionally?

@@lewis9729 Guitar and sing. It's just a cover band (and definitely have some Beatles in the setlist!) in Southern California.

@@yikesboy13 Ah, very nice

But that's just it though, half the time they're flat.

@@johnmcgahern3946 Hmmm, I'd say they were pretty damn close for live. I think you'd be amazed at how most artists today lean heavily on pitch correction. Mostly in the studio but more and more live as well. And they have the benefit of in-ear monitoring and/or wedges too. The Beatles live had none of this kind of monitoring support and even had to sing significant distances apart (and still hit notes in sync and in key). Crazy.