I turned the auto-generated captions at 1:30:15 to see what he said, and this is what it wrote: "think about german and it's the gestapo again no sensei music"...
Word of warning: this has been blocked in the UK by LDS (as was series 39). Dunno who LDS is since all I can bring up via Google Search is the mormon church and AFAICT there's absolutely NOTHING in these clips that concerns them.
Bigg Huggs and Happy Things that's what you get for 40 uploads of FUN!!! yes, comments section, this is number 41, but if you are a regular viewer you know that one compilation didn't make it because of those rat bastards that are still grubbing coins from every last replay of HIGGY 36. Laments aside, we have 40 others to cherish.
@PokerPlayerJames same reason anyone comments, to make a comment about something. If you watch it in the UK you can't even comment I assumed people would know.
Mrs Richards: "I paid for a room with a view!" Basil: (pointing to the lovely view) "That is Torquay, Madam." Mrs Richards: "It's not good enough!" Basil: "May I ask what you were expecting to see out of a Torquay hotel bedroom window? Sydney Opera House, perhaps? the Hanging Gardens of Babylon? Herds of wildebeest sweeping majestically past?..." Mrs Richards: "Don't be silly! I expect to be able to see the sea!" Basil: "You can see the sea, it's over there between the land and the sky." Mrs Richards: "I'm not satisfied. But I shall stay. But I expect a reduction." Basil: "Why?! Because Krakatoa's not erupting at the moment?" ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-POO4lrTclNY.html
I know I'll probably get a truck load of shit for this but I think *on a limited basis* the "Super Injunction" is a good idea. Celebrities, Royals, Politicians, getting exposed in the press for cheating on their spouses (or some other publicly harmless or irrelevant bad decision) is *first* a pointless waste of time because it's really none of our business. Think about it: if one of you accidently found out one of your co-workers or neighbors was having an affair, would you immediately post it on Instagram? Yes you'd tell a few people, but would you broadcast it? I think a lot of us wouldn't and not just for fear of being sued, rather at the end of the day most of us wouldn't out of some kind of respect for their privacy. *Second* is the issue that talented reporters spend a lot of time chasing nonsense when they could be chasing stories that really do matter to people. Such as chasing down undeniable proof the US intentionally lied about Iraq's WMD, or proving Murdoch bribed politicians by chasing money trails, etc.... And there's probably stories we missed because we were too busy caring about a celebrity's time in rehab, and so on and on. Sure some journalist prefer chasing these stories, but I feel that I'm solid ground here when I say that most would rather do news with substance and value. Therefor I think "Super Injunctions" *strictly* *limited* *to* *people's* *personal* *lives* would be a good idea.
Politicians claiming family values and making policy to force us all to comply with their views, then cheating is conduct which must bw reported in the public interest. Ditto any royals funded on our dime.
Obviously you don't know who Ian and Paul are. Sara Palin is a moron and clueless on most things and she's on a reality show these days or was because it was cancelled!!!
