The Biggest Lie about the Quran 

It's amazing that the early Muslims never sold the idea of perfect preservation, only modern Muslims do! Didn't Uthman burn some of the collection.

Even classical Islamic scholarship tells us that the 'word for word, letter for letter' exact transmission of the Quran is an apologetic legend.

Those who understand the Quran, will leave Islam.

Great content as always! Don't forget to like and share!

Why were all the books gathered together and burned, so that only 1 remained? If they were all the same, this would not have been necessary.

Thanks for a clear and straightforward argument- as an ex-Muslim myself, I think the best way to convince Muslims of problems with the Quran is with clear historical evidence like this from Muslim history It’s important not to ascribe malice and ill intent to these arguments- a lot of Christian polemics are presented in a condescending and ignorant and bullying fashion, but you present your arguments clearly and emphatically and as an Arabic speaker and someone who has done research Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence and the Quran makes the most extraordinary claim of all human books that it is of Divine Origin from the Creator of the Universe and to believe that claim Muslims MUST be willing to critically and skeptically scrutinize it and it’s history Unfortunately human nature and identity issues makes that extremely difficult but it’s good to see videos like this - keep it up!

Indeed, it is the biggest lie and the worst human production that could happen in the past, present, and future . All my love to you, Mr. Adam ❤❤

Excellent video, thanks ! There is also a hadith in which Aisha said that some verses have scribal errors. I think it could be interesting to make a video about it

Allah waited all those millennia to reveal his eternal word, but he just couldn't wait one more century for its recipients to finish their writing system

Thank you brother! They are denying the fact, that all is a lie. 😢

Islam, now that you’ve got the world’s attention … it appears that the attention is a bit too close. Upon further examination, the Islamic narration has holes in it.

Muslims believed that the quran is unchanged and there are no variants. This is not true. Did you know that the official version of the quran was only finalised in 1924 in Cairo, Egypt? And only officially canonized in 1985 in Saudi Arabia? Scholars know that there are several versions of the quran, but the average muslim does not. Why? The 2 most widely used versions in existence today are the Hafs and Warsh versions. (Others are Qalun, Al Susi, Ibn Kathir, Abi Ja'far, Ibn Jamaz, Ya'quub, Al-Duri, Khalaf, Al Qisai, Ibn Amir, Abu Amar, Al Bazi etc) Is yours a Hafs or Warsh version? Look at the first verse of sura al-fatihah. If there is a number “1” after the Bismillah verse, then you have the Hafs version. If not, you have the Warsh version. The few knowledgeable muslims who are aware of the existence of these 2 different versions will say there are very minor differences, mainly vocal variations. Again this is not true. Here are a couple of examples of text variants that can be found in the Arabic Hafs and Warsh that show that the quranic text and meaning itself has been altered! 2:125 in Hafs is وَاتَّخِذوْا “WatakhIzu” (You shall take) / In Warsh it is وَاتَّخَذوْا “WatakhAzu” (They have taken/made). In 2:125 One version gives a command, while the other states a historical observation. Another one: 3:146 in Hafs is قاتل “Qatal” (Fought) / In Warsh it is ُقتل “Qutil” (Were Killed). In 3:146 the difference is between a prophet and those with him being killed, while in the other the difference only means that they fought by his side. There’s more: Look up 2:85, 15:8, 21:4, 33:68, 42:30, 48:17 in both these versions and see for yourself. In fact, if you study futher, you will find that number of verses in Hafs is 6236, while Warsh has only 6214 verses. Were you aware of this? Probably not. Why not? Which is the right version? Hafs or Warsh? Didn’t allah say that he will preserve his word? (sura 15:9) Who managed to change his words and cause allah to break his promise? The number of hadith collected and attributed to prophet Muhammed is in the hundreds of thousands, as much as 700,000. Let us now look at some of the famous hadith collectors and what they collected. (1) Malik Ibn Anas collected about 500 hadith in his famous book, Al-Muwattaa. (2) Ahmed Ibn Hanbal, collected about 40,000 hadith, in his famous Musnad. He chose these 40,000 hadith from among 700,000 hadith. In other words he thought 660,000 hadith were un-proven, lies and/or fabrications and the others may be authentic. That is, 94% were lies and fabrications. (3) Bukhari collected about 600,000 hadith. He accepted 7275 hadith and considered 592,725 hadith to be un-proven hadith, lies and/or fabrications. In other words, 99% of what he collected were considered unauthentic. (4) Muslem collected 300,000 hadith. He accepted 4000 of them and rejected 296,000, that is, almost 99% were rejected. This gives us an idea of how much corruption entered or tried to enter Islam from the back door.

Do you Have PPT or PDF with this content. I have ben fallowing you and you are very convincing. If possible, it would be good to share any available materials with this content

God does not abrogate for he does not make mistakes. I wish that Muslims learnt to question things about their religion. The hadiths came a century after Muhammad died. Almost as if Muslims realised that the Quran was not enough to convert

I love the tame sheep Hadith. The Quran’s perfect preservation meets its demise at the hands of a farm animal, which was probably no accident.

When scholars lie about the Quran being untouched since the time of Muhammad, those lies contradict several hadiths confirming that many verses even chapters missing from the Quran we have today.

the greatest miracle is a goat can beat it creator lol

Qur'an revalation missing: the Breastfeeding adult The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding an adult ten times was revealed and the paper was with me under my pillow. When the Messenger of Allah died, we were preoccupied with his death, and a tame sheep came in and ate it Hasan (Darussalam) Reference : Sunan Ibn Majah 1944 In-book reference : Book 9, Hadith 100 English translation : Vol. 3, Book 9, Hadith 1944 The Verse of stoning and of breastfeeding adult is missing from the quran. This was memories at the time of Muhammad and people. why is it missing from the Qur'an?

About the "stoning adulters" verse Omer says that "If I was not afraid that people would blame me adding to quran I would obligatorly put stoning verse. In future some people may deny stoning, it is legal, stonin is real and a quran verse". Today muslims accept stoning verse as "a verse its written form abrogated but its meaning is staying". Not joke.

Where is the part eaten by goat?

Sanskrit texts and hymns have been passed down unchanged for far longer than the Koran. Does that make Hinduism more the word of God(s) than Islam?

Ironically the most incriminating verses of Surat al ahzab were preserved (the ones about Muhammad marrying his adopted son's ex wife and people not staying too long at his house), it would be less embarrassing for islam if those verses were lost

Another excellent video, Adam.

Perfect preservation of the Quran is as fictitious and fallacious as Muhammad's flight to Jerusalem on the back of the winged Al-Buraq!!! Great video bro. Keep them coming!!!

What one there at least 30 korans. You know the stuff their scholars are not advised to talk about in public. Allah didn’t see the internet coming.‼️

IF ANY ONE CLAIMS IF THERES A VERSE MISSING, THEN BRING IT ??? HOW CAN YOU BRING IT,IF ITS MISSING OR BEEN EATEN

How can it be letter for letter transmitted when there's different Quran's today that are not letter to letter the same. Most Muslims don't know there are different versions of the Quran printed today and have different letters verse numbered and words. I have two versions at my house when is the Hafs version and the other is warsh.

Thanks for the careful research, Adam

Allah calls to die for him, Christ calls to live for him.

I am interested in your reading list, the books behind you, and your opinion of them.

I love watching the in-depth unbiased analysis in your videos. Kudos to you Sir.

I am not an Arabic speaker, but I was under the impression that 7th century Arabic had no diacritical markings. It's fascinating that Allah popped down from his stroll through all 7 heavens, just to add the dots and dashes.

the "all knowing Lah" moon god, did not know that the internet will bring islam down, he forgot to mention that in the quran, may be the goat that ate a part of the quran, did not have enough so it decided to eat that specific verse that spoke about the internet, youtube, and other social media ...

If I were rich I would tell you take my money and continue spreading this beautiful information ❤

They say Muhammad couldn't read or write. Why didn't God give him a tablet like He did Moses. Why didn't God speak to him directly.

Thx for the truth brother

funny, apologetic says allah made them forgot or abrogated, chose one that suit best for your dawah 😂😂😂

"To claim that is is missing, but you can't bring it, this is a baseless claim." Says the apologist for a religion that claims the gospels were changed, yet can't produce any originals or even tell us what was in them.

Notification of happiness ❤

Thanks for your videos

I could find only one truth in the Quran, allah admitting to be the best dcver.

The goat knew that the verses were under the pillow

In the 6th century arabic language only has 16 alphabets Nowadays arabic language has 28 alphabets Why dont they use 16 alphabet quran like in qutham era???

Without lie Islam will die

a part of it is missing, a goat ate it, that's according to aisha, in hadith 100% authentic (hadith sahih)

I am an ex Muslim imaam from Uganda. I left Islam because if the lies about the preservation and perfection of the Quran. The Koran contains historical, scientific and linguistic errors

The sad thing about Islam is that the majority of Islamic adherents don't read the glorious Quran.

As a natively arabic speaker, I was fortunate to have direct access to the original sources of Islamic religious books and witnessed the chaos and confusion in understanding and interpreting the verses of the Quran. Non-Arab Muslims are far removed from all of this because their relationship with these books inevitably passes through the filter of devout Muslim translators. What reaches non-Muslims is a single interpretation of a verse. They do not know that sometimes there are more than ten different interpretations, clearly indicating the confusion in understanding the verse. This is in addition to the many incorrect words, strange phrases, and missing sentences in the Quran. Moreover, Muslim scholars even disagree on the number of abrogated verses. Arab Muslim apologists are professional in their work. I advise non-Muslims to read only Al-Tabari's interpretation and nothing else in terms of commentary.

good content as always. thank you:) your hands movement is a bit similar to Haytham Talaat :)😶

Here are some examples of notable differences between the modern Qur'an (1924 Cairo edition) and early Uthmanic manuscripts. While many of these differences are minor, they provide insight into the textual variations observed over time. Orthographic Variations: The use of different scripts and orthographic conventions can be seen. For example, in early manuscripts, the word for "be" (kun) might be written without the vowel marks that are present in the Cairo edition. Diacritical Marks: Early Uthmanic manuscripts did not use diacritical marks, which indicate vowels. This led to different possible readings of the text. For example, the word "فتبينوا" (fatabayyanu) in Surah 49:6 in the Cairo edition, meaning "verify," could be read as "فتثبتوا" (fatathabbatu), meaning "ascertain," in early manuscripts without diacritical marks. Word Variations: In some cases, there are differences in specific words. For instance: Surah 2:132 in the Cairo edition has "ووصى" (wa-awṣā, "and he enjoined"), whereas some early manuscripts have "وأوصى" (wa-awṣā, "and he enjoined") without the waw at the beginning. Additional Words: In Surah 33:6, the Cairo edition includes "وأزواجه أمهاتهم" (wa-azwājuhu ummahātuhum, "and his wives are their mothers"). Some early manuscripts do not have this phrase, indicating it might have been a marginal note that was later incorporated into the text. Differences in Recitations (Qira'at): The Cairo edition primarily follows the Hafs 'an 'Asim recitation. Other recitations, like Warsh 'an Nafi', have different vowelization and, occasionally, word forms. For example: Surah 1:4 is read as "ملك يوم الدين" (Maliki yawmi ad-din, "Master of the Day of Judgment") in the Warsh recitation, whereas the Cairo edition reads it as "مالك يوم الدين" (Maliki yawmi ad-din, "King of the Day of Judgment"). These examples highlight the types of variations found between the Cairo edition and earlier manuscripts or different recitation traditions. While they do not usually change the overall meaning significantly, they do demonstrate that the text of the Qur'an has undergone standardization processes over time.

Where is the Stoning and Breastfeeding part of the Quran? GOAT

Hi Adam, we know that Ubay bin Kaab was one of the 4 people the prophet recommended regarding revelation. Ubay bin Kaab had his own mushaf which had a different number of chapters and perhaps a different order of verses. The conversation between Ubay bin Kaab and Imam Ahmad was Ubay bin Kaab's attempt to find out how the Utsman mushaf was then agreed to be the standard. Ubay seemed to want to know what the final version of the Utsman mushaf was like during Imam Ahmad's time. Ubay asked Imam Ahmad, who I suspect was younger and familiar with the Utsman mushaf. What Ubay bin Kaab conveyed to Imam Ahmad was information regarding his version of Surah Al Ahzab, which had more verses than the one in the Utsman mushaf. But do we immediately conclude that many verses are missing? It is possible that those verses were placed in other surahs in the Utsman mushaf based on an agreement to standardize the compilation of revelation (the Quran). This could happen considering that there is no information comparing the number of verses in the Ubay bin Kaab mushaf surah with the Utsman mushaf. Let's imagine, would the collection committee allow the 200 or so revelations in Ubay bin Kaab's mushaf to disappear? Meanwhile, Umar's intention for compiling revelations was so that the revelations would not be lost because the memorizer died. My assumption is that, there are no known revelations that were omitted from being collected. The only difference is the difference in the way the verses are arranged in the surahs and mushaf. Compiling revelations in a book is indeed a human effort. It may not be 100% perfect. However, it was the best effort of the companions to preserve revelation based on their love to revelation. And after being standardized by Utsman, it never changed again.

Abrogation equals corruption.

Abrigation was a later invention. Possibly by Ottomons. How can God change his mind in only 23 years. I can understand verses can be changed to fit different time spans like centuries.

If the Prophet verified the verses reaveled to him by Satan...why did he remove them from the Quran???

Shouldnt there be a verse thet says what verses had been abrogated by allah? How do we know they were abrogated by god if theres no verse saying so? Its like using half of a contract and saying "oh, we made a contract saying we dont need that part of the contract" but cant show the second contract.

Videos are an amazing medium, we also need this in written document as a list, a list would be great to use while debating Muslims

And say: The truth has come the falsehood has vanished, indeed falsehood bount to vanish.Ouran 17:81❤

What a coincidence that the only 2 verses that were lost in Aisha's care were verses that affected women exclusively. 🤔🤔🤔

Thx ❤

Before the Prophets death, the Prophet recited the quran to his companions and they memorised it. He did this many tiem. Some of them had really good memory and there were various Huffaz. The commitee at the time of Hazrat Uthman burned copies due to issues of dialect, not preservation.

كل الدعم و التقدير استاد ادم الرائع

Well I think you may find acheological find of the oldest quran which is 1400 years old...it is the same as the one we read today

The biggest lie about Quran is that it is true and preserved!

@Adam Elmasri - please make full video

Adam, have you seen that Sherif Gaber was arrested? :(((((

By "lost" Imam Malik means "gone" i.e. "abrogated." He doesn't mean someone "misplaced" it which is why we no longer have it. Basically, what Imam Malik said is that there were narrations from the Sahabah that Surah Tawbah used to be as long as Surah Baqarah. And he used this as evidence (because Surah Tawbah isn't currently as long as Baqarah) that there were other verses alongside the Basmalah that were in it, but are now abrogated. This is the original quote in Tafsir Qurtubi: وَقَالَ مَالِكٌ فِيمَا رَوَاهُ ابْنُ وَهْبٍ وَابْنُ الْقَاسِمِ وَابْنُ عَبْدِ الْحَكَمِ: إِنَّهُ لما سقط أو لها سَقَطَ بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ مَعَهُ. وَرُوِيَ ذَلِكَ عَنِ ابْنِ عَجْلَانَ أَنَّهُ بَلَغَهُ أَنَّ سُورَةَ "بَرَاءَةٌ" كَانَتْ تَعْدِلُ الْبَقَرَةَ أَوْ قُرْبَهَا فَذَهَبَ مِنْهَا فَلِذَلِكَ لَمْ يُكْتَبْ بَيْنَهُمَا بِسْمِ اللَّهِ الرَّحْمَنِ الرَّحِيمِ. The word translated as "lost" in your translation is "سَقَطَ." The evidence that he does not mean "misplaced" is that another narration from Imam Malik exists that elaborates on this particular narration in Tafsir Al-Qurtubi you quoted. Ibn Atiyah says: وروي عن مالك أنه قال: بلغنا أنها كانت نحو سورة البقرة ثم نسخ ورفع كثير منها وفيه البسملة It was narrated from Imam Malik that he said: It reached us that it was as long as Surah Baqarah. Then, a lot of it was abrogated and taken up and among that (the abrogated) was the Basmalah. (Tafsir Ibn Atiyah 3/3) (Translation is mine) Here, rather than "سَقَطَ", Imam Malik clearly says "abrogated and taken up." In addition, saying Imam Malik meant "misplaced" doesn't make sense in context. This is because he says the Basmalah was also "lost" alongside it. In what sense, could someone claim the Basmalah is misplaced? We have the letter by letter Basmalah obviously. Imam Malik says we have knowledge that the Basmalah was part of Surah Tawbah. So, in what sense could one claim the Basmalah was misplaced from Surah Tawbah? In my opinion, "lost" was poor choice in translation, but even in English "lost" doesn't need to mean "misplaced." For example, if someone says: "I lost a million dollars," does he mean he misplaced them? No, he means he used to have them but for some reason no longer has them. It is clear, then, that Imam Malik is saying it was abrogated as elaborated in the other narration. As for evidence from the Quran that the earlier parts of Surah Tawbah are abrogated, that is easy. Open a mushaf. Do you see those parts of Surah Tawbah? If not, it was abrogated. The Quran is a mutawatir narration. It is its own proof that Surah Tawbah's verses are abrogated. No one narrated those verses to us, hence it is clear the Sahabah agreed on their abrogation (if they existed). Adam, there is no need to be apologetic here. Again if your assumption is that abrogating 5% of the Quran is illogical. That in itself of itself is illogical God had ruling introduced for a specific period of time and abrogated it EVEN IF IT DOES NOT MENTION 2 PEOPLE DISCUSSING it in a Hadith. It does not mean that it was not abrogated haha. I think your using 50% of critical thinking and leave out the other 50% of it

There is no complete quran from Muhammads time anywhere in existence. Al lah said he gave Muhammad a book! Where is it?

Elmasri, could you advise if 5:117 states 'taken up' or 'caused to die?'

Its nasty in any language

I'm not sure why this is even a controversy. Even among the four Uthmanic Qur'ans sent to different cities, there are 60 differences. The modern Qur'an (1924 Cairo edition) has about 2,000 differences. These are minor and do not significantly alter the meaning, but the idea of perfect preservation is incorrect. Islamic scholars use the term "essentially identical," not "identical." The historical evidence shows that the Qur'an, like other ancient texts, has experienced some variations over time.

If Abu Harb bin Abu Al-Aswad forgot, as he said, 70 verses, how did he know there were 70 of them? He forgot. If he found them later, he could say, "Ah, these are the verses I forgot. There are 70 of them." But if he totally forgot these verses, he could not know the number. You can't know what you forget!!

This guy is in great Error! Elhamdullilah i am muslim!

In a nutshell : Muhammad is allah

“Whatever a Verse (revelation) do We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring a better one or similar to it. Know you not that Allah is able to do all things? Know you not that it is Allah to Whom belongs the dominion of the heavens and the earth? And besides Allah you have neither any Walee (protector or guardian) nor any helper.” [al-Baqarah 2:106-107]. your entire argument crumbles when Allah himself admits he can cause verses to be forgotten or abrogated.

Good video

Thank you for this, so informative. They really are in denial about this topic aren’t they. ✝️✝️✝️🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻

You stand mistaken..allow me to correct you 1) You quoted a narration where Ubayy Bin Kaab mentions that Suratul Ahzab was as long as surah Baqarah and it contained the verses of stoning. What you failed to mention was that surahs were not named during the time of the Prophet and were not placed in the Quran in the order it was revealed to Muhammad. So it could very well be that Ubayy bin Kab was mistaken in attributing many large portions of different surahs to be part of this one Surah (Ahzab) thus thinking it to be as big as Surah Baqarah. Notice he never said the verses were missing, rather he's saying that this particular surah as he remembered it was as long as another surah. Ubayy bin Kaab was one of 15 scribes to write down the verses of the Quran and he had his own Mushaf. Why didn't he bring his manuscript forward to tell the others "these are the other missing verses." It didn't happen because the other scribes like Zaid bin Thabit etc explained to him what the Prophet instructed in the order and sequence of revelation and what verses were abrogated in reading but not in practice etc. Also majority of the time, the number of verses in a surah were not set in stone during the time of Muhammad. The Quran was an oral scripture..every pause heard while reading can be either perceived as a "new verse" or a pause within a long verse. This officially numbered verses came about long after. 2) Thanks for proving our point: Huzaifah said, "But then I FORGOT 70 verses and I could never find it" why couldn't he find it existing with anyone? Because Allah says in Quran, "We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be FORGOTTEN except that We bring forth better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is competent over all things." [2:106]. So this is why these companions could not recall, remember and bring forward these verses. God Almighty, ever true to his promise caused them to be forgotten. 3) Ayesha saying that surah Ahzab was 200 verses during the Prophet's time..wait..I thought it was as long as Surah Baqarah which contains 286 verses? Again, simply, these verses were not codified and numbered. She's remembering the Quran as an oral recited scripture so what she or Ubayy bin Kab considered to be one long verse could in fact have been 2 or 3 short verses (and vice versa) thus accounting of her number of 200 verses. Added to that was the reality of abrogation, that would cause those companions who memorized it to forget those specific verses. Adam says that its illogical to assume that 213 verses or 5% (wrong, its actually 3.4%) of the Quran were abrogated but if we look at the Quran as a practical guide that took a period 23 years to be revealed, then this concept isn't farfetched. 4)You said that Uthman tried his best to "find" these 70 lost verses? Very dishonest of you. By the time he was the Caliph, the Quran was already compiled by the renowned experts of the Quran including the same Ubayy bin Kaab, Abdullah bin Masood and Zaid bin Thabit. Uthman only had to take the Mushaf compiled by Abu Bakr 4 years before. Also, it is a well established historical fact that Umar placed the same Ubayy bin Kaab (during his first Ramadhan as caliph) as the Hafiz to lead the Muslims in 20 Rakaat Taraweeh. What Quran did he recite? Why didn't anyone oppose his "Quran of extra verses" that he recited? The reality is, after the conpanions came together to compile the Mushaf, all of them were in full agreement as to what the Quran was. This fully supports the narrative of 'Tawaatur' continous, generational chain of the Quran being passed down. 5) Ayesha saying that the goat ate the verses of Quran proves what what we've been saying all along. The verses eaten and erased were those of adult breastfeeding and stoning of the adulterer. Which according to all the scholars and companions were abrogated from the Quran. No one debated about these issues. Stop with the deception. Adam says some remembered the verse some didnt..no what they remembered was it being part of the Quran at one time, but they forgot the actual wordings of the verses like all other abrogated verses Allah caused to forget. 6)Abduallah bin Masood did not have 3 surahs in his Mushaf -the opening chapter (Al Fatiha) and the final 2 surahs Falaq and Nas. If he didn't think of them as part of the Quran, then how did he pray Salah? Because reciting the Fatiha is essential for the acceptance of prayer. Obviously, it means that these surahs were so commonly known and memorized there was no need to have them included in his personal Quran. Everyone knows that Muawwazatain (Surah Falaq and Nas) are the cures of the Quran against black magic. 7) The hadith in Muslim speaking about the verse that a companion forgot and remembered it went like this, "if the son of Adam had two valleys of gold.." Either Adam doesn't know or he's hiding the truth; the companion mixed up this verse with a hadith of the Prophet Muhammad. He thought it was from Quran but wasn't. 8) "People are swearing by Allah to each other about the verses they received from the Prophet." Most likely what they heard was a dua (supplication) or statement from the Prophet and included it as part of the Quran. As evidence from the hadith of Muslim. This is why the council of the Quran was developed after the Rasool passed away, to evaluate, analyze and scrutinize every verse to bring a consensus of the Quran. In conclusion, its easy to pick apart a few isolated statements here and there to discredit the Quran, but when we look at the facts of 1)Abrogation 2)The Quran only existing orally during Muhammad's time and not standardized with names of surahs and official number of verses 3) There were Huffaz (memorizers of the Quran) who existed within Muhammad's time 4) some companions mixing up supplications, hadiths and abrogated verses as Quran 5) A council was formed to scrutinize and officially pen every verse thereby correcting the misconceptions and misheard recited elements that were present among some of the companions 6)The Quran being recited in its entirety every Ramadhan for 14 centuries and being memorized during Muhammad's lifetime until today.

It is interesting to know that (Musnad Ahmad) is not a collection of the authentic Ahadeeth only, although this was the intention of Imam Ahmad, may Allah have mercy on him, which is to scutinize his collection afterward and to keep the authentic Ahadeeth only. But-Subhan Allah- he passed away before doing so. However, the Ahadeeth in Musnad Ahmad were classified by contemporsy great Imams, like Ahmad Shakir and Abdul-Rahman Al-Sa’aty Al-Banna. With this in mind, here is the status of the relevant narrations; 1- The narration of Aysha RAA indicated that Suratul-Ahzab was 200 Ayat is a weak narration. It was narrated through (Ibn Luhaya’ah) and his narrations are rejected.

Without lies islam dies

Dr. Nazar Shady, the Arabic scholar and researcher of Harward clearly refuted the chain of transmission. Uthman burned the original quran, then Mohammad bin Abubacker the son of first Khalifa and brother of his beloved wife Aisha killed Uthman , telling " you changed Allah's quran". Read the book " Christ, Mohammad and I" by the Arabic scholar Mohammad Al Gazouly.

Commonsense dictates that the Koran is a man made book, which was written according to the understanding of the world at that time, it's words has been edited , omitted and what not , but people will believe what they want to believe true or untrue.

I left Islam and became a Christian for two reasons. First: due to the presence of abrogated verses in the Quran which is called Nasekh and Mansukh . Allah deleted some of the verses in Quran that were revealed earlier and replaced them with new verses. If this claim is true, God is not all-knowing and omnipotent as Muslims claim, and evolves with time, or the verses of the Qur'an are created by Muhammad's mind. Second: Satan has the power to disguise himself as he disguised himself as a snake and deceived Adam and Eve. How do I know that the devil did not disguise himself as the Angel Gabriel and did not deceive Muhammad? Unparalleled cutting of arms and legs of nonbelievers and trampling of women and buying and selling of slaves cannot be from God who is called to be : Kind, Compassionate , forgiving and merciful.

Abrogated by a tame sheep

🧕 Dear Brothers In Islam, Q49:10…God’s Complete Divine Laws & Commandments/The The Furqan/The Commandments/The Heavy Words were given to Bani Israel 👉🏿Q2:213, Q73:5, Q2:53, Q45:16-17 (Clear Proofs On The Matters/Divine Laws & Commandments) then to us, Q77:23, Q73:5, Q2:213, Q25:1, Q45:18, Q5:3, Q97:4, Q44:2-8 (Every Matters/Divine Laws & Commandments Have Been Ordained)…So AL-FURQAN means The Judgement Book (Not The Criterion 👎) 👉🏿 Q13:36-37, Q10:1, Q26:1, Q2:53, Q2:213, Q42:17 📖⚖️ Then why are U reading your Quran upside down? Quran is an easy Book to understand, says Allah not me 👉🏿 Q54:17 KILLING outside of Qisas Law (Not Slap Cheek Law Dear Christians 🤣 Matthew 5:38-39)👎) & Mischief On Earth Law is AL-Khabaitha/The Impure Satans’ Way HARAM KILLING 👉🏿 Q5:32-33…This has been Ordained to Bani Israel 👉🏿 Q45:16-17 time & time again they failed TO BE PURIFIED (Means they Do Not Believe Fully In God’s Word, Q9:29, Ezekial 24:13, Q4:155, Matthew 23:37) By Verses From Taurat gicen to The Prophets, Q5:45, Q5:46, Matthew 23:37, Deaut 16:18, Deaut 7:11-13, 1 Kings 6:11-13, Matthew 5:17 (God’s Divine Law), Q3:50 (Same meaning as Q9:29, Read In Vice Versa) - I (Prophet Jesus) make HALAL/GOD PERMITS some of that which was made haram by The Rabbis (And Vice Versa 👉🏿 I make HARAM/GOD FORBIDS some of that which was made halal by The Rabbis Eg John 8:1-11, God’s Divine Punishment is Lashing Q24::1-2, Q4:16 VS Leviticus 20:10, Deauterenomy 22:22 copied by 🐐 Hadith Writers Sunan Abi Dawud 4449, Sunan Ibn Majah 1944, Sahih Bukhari 6829 Zina means HARAM Sexual Intercourse… Zani & Zaniyah means A Male & A Female Offender Of Zina 👉🏿 Q24:2, Q4:16 (Zani & Zani)…STOP ✋ using these misfit words for Quran!!! 👉🏿 Adultery, Adulterer, Adulteress, Fornication, Fornicator, Fornicatress And Zina Offence falls under AL-Fahisha Offence 👉🏿 Q7:33 - AL-Fahisha Law… So READ further 👉🏿 Q17:32, Q6:151, Q25:68-71 Dear Brothers In Islam, Q49:10…What other AL-Khabaitha/Satanic Verses HARAM KILLINGS are in Taurat/Old Testament & copied by Early Men 🐐 Hadith Writers? GO 👉🏿 Read them Urselves I aint gonna Baby Spoon-Feed U all the time 👶🥣 The Quran is not A Half Page Book but The Final Tamat Book Conplete In Divine Laws & Commandments as A Guidance To Mankind…The Quran is the only Kitab Protected by God’s Holy Dpirit/Power Of Unseen, Q6:115, Q33:40, Q15:9, Q4:82…So No Holes In Its Narrative/Missing Verses but 🐐💩💩💩 in Ur brains! U are Transgressors Of Quran under the influence of Big Satans, Q7:175, Q2.208 😈 U have taken The Early Men Rabbis, The Christian Teacher Monks & The Hadith Writers who had PLAYED GODS with God’s Word as Gods besides Allah 👉🏿 Q7:175, Q2:208, Q5:13, Q5:14, Q5:15, Q3:71, Q11:110, Q6:91, Q62:5-8, Q9:31, Q4:48, Q49:14, Q6:21, Q96:6, Q16:36, Q2:256, Q54:3, Q8:55 - Worse Than A Moving 🐐 Muhammad never did HARAM KILLINGS & never teach U those AL-Khabaitha Satans’ Impure Ways…He was A True Believer Muslim who Entered Islam Conpletely & Avoided Ar-Rujz/Satanic Verses/Satans’ Evil Whispers 😈 Q2:285, Q4:105, Q4:65, Q4:58, Q74:4-5, Q2:257, Q24:21, Q2:151, Q114-1-6, Q7:175, Q7:200, Q8:11, Q2:208, Q33:1-3, Q36:2-5, Q47:1-3, Q33:45-48, Q11:119, Q9:18 🕌🕌, Sahih Bukhari 109 Muhamnad BELIEVED IN ALLAH & THE LAST DAY/Believe Fully In The Quran & that is The First Article Of Faith 👉🏿 Q2:177, Q16:44, Q3:31, Q3:103, Q74:5, Q2:208, Q7:200, Q8:11, Q4:136, Q2:136, Q9:29, Q33:45-48, Q2:2-5, Q1:6-7, Q2:82, Q2:277, Q45:30, Q64:8-9, Q2:285, Q4:105, Q22:78 (The Chosen Ones), Q3:110 (Raised The Best Of Mankind), Q44:2-8, Q97:4, Q5:3, Q45:16-18, Q42:13, Q42:15, Q17:32-33, Q6:151, Q25:68-71, Q5:32-33, Q5:48-50, Q2:213 (God sent down His Divine Laws & Comnandments to The Prophets), Q13:36-37 & Q10:1 (Quran is The Judgement Book), Q42:17 - Quran’s Law is God’s Complete Divine Law is Balance Scale Of Justice Law ⚖️ So U have to fulfill The First Article Of Faith that is BELIEVE IN ALLAH & THE LAST DAY/BELUEVE FULLY IN THE QURAN 📖 before God accepts YOUR TURNING OF FACES EAST OR WEST IN SOLATS 👉🏿 Q2:177, Q2:82, Q2:277, Q45:30, Q64:8-9, Q9:72, Q57:21 SEE…I give U a wider picture of the meaning of GOOD DEEDS 👉🏾 Doing GOOD DEEDS/AL-Maaruf/Amalu AS-Salihati/Ar-Birr or AT-Tayyibat/The Pure Way/God’s Divine Guidance/God’s Sunnah or Way shown by Allah in Quran is to fulfill The First Article Of Faith, BELIEVE FULLY IN ALLAH’S WORD, THE QURAN, Q21:2, Q9:72, Q57:21, Q2:213, Q42:13, Q45:16-18, Q4:64, Q2:89, Q2:177, Q11:7, Q17:7, Q6:164, Ecclesiastes 12:14, Q2:40-48, Q2:38, Q2:2-5, Q1:6-7, Deauterenomy 16:18, Deauterenomy 7:11-13, 1 Kings 6:11-13, Paalms 119:105-106, Mathhew 23:37, Matthew 5:17 (God’s Divinie Laws) LOOK, Quran Dot Com Q11:7 - And He (Allah) (is) The One who created The HeavenS & The Earth (Genesis 1:1) in six Days and His Throne is ABOVE The Water (Q11:119, Q21:30 - Jinns & Human) (so) that He test which of you (is) the best in DEEDS/AMALAN… Continue Reading…. His Throne is ABOVE The Water means God is superior to us & Jinns and His Power encompassed us & His Will/Authority is imposed on us, Q4:126, Q7:54 - The Power To Create & Command belongs solely to God So GOOD DEEDS means Believe Fully In Allah & The Last Day means Establishing All Of God’s Pure Ways/God’s Divine Guidance/God’s Sunnah in Quran means Submit Fully To God’s Will means ISLAM, Q73:5 (God’s Heavy Words/Complete Divine Laws & Commandments), Q2:213, Q4:163, Q21:105, Q103:1-3, Q5:3, 42:15, Q46:13, Q44:2-8, Q97:4, Q42:13, Q3:83, Q3:85, Luke 11:4 (Thy Will Be Done On Earth As In HeavenS), Q10:15, Q81:17-27, Q11:7, Q17:7, Q6:164, Q2:2-5, Q1:6-7, Q7:157, Q5:86-88, Q45:16-18, Q5:7, Q13:20-24, Q42:15, Q46:13, Q2:177, Q2:136, Q4:136, Q3:50 & Q9:29, Q17:77, Q2:38, Q2:213, Q3:83, Q3:85, Q9:18 (True Believer Muslina are True Guardians Of Allah’s MosqueS 🕌🕌) 👍 HADITHS -The Prophet of Allah صَلَّى الـلّٰـهُ عَلَيْهِ وَاٰلِهٖ وَسَلَّم has said: ‘أَيُّهَا النَّاسُ! إِنَّ اللهَ طَيِّبٌ لَا يَقْبَلُ إِلَّا طَيِّبًا’ ‘O people! Indeed, Allah is Pure/Zaka/Tayyib…He only accepts The Pure (At-Tayyibat, Ezekial 24:13, KURAN 24:21, Q2:151, Q3:42-43, Q91:7-10, Q11:7, Q17:7, Q2:2-5, Q1:6-7, Q2:257, Q2:129, Q9:31, 5:87-88, 7:157, Q9:18 🕌🕌).’ (Muslim, p. 393, Hadees 1015) 🦁 I am The Lionezz Of Islam & I show U THE TRUTH/AL-HAQQI from Quran The Correct Statement/Hadith, Q45:6, Q25:52, Q42:10

SILAM itself is a lI.E from start to finish

Without lies Islam dies 💔 😢 Thank you sir.

VERY GOOD.PLEASE GIVE THE NUMBERS IN THE HADITH YOU QUOTED.

How can a lie be preserved

Humans dictate what Gods had to say.

We must to Leave islam to save the world free from higab

We do not abrogate a verse or cause it to be forgotten except that We bring forth [one] better than it or similar to it. Do you not know that Allah is over all things competent? - Chapter 2 Verse 106. And regarding the mu'awwidhatayn, assuming that the report that Ibn Ma‘ood denied that the Mi‘wadhatayn were part of the Qur’an is saheeh, what proof do you have that he did not later change his opinion. And in the recitation of ‘Aasim from Ibn Mas‘ood the Mi‘wadhatayn are confirmed (as part of the Qur’an). This recitation is saheeh and was narrated soundly (via saheeh isnaads) from Ibn Mas‘ood. So this only proves that initially he used to deny they were part of the Qur’an, but when it became clear to him that they are part of the Qur’an, he wrote them in his Mushaf and recanted his earlier opinion.

👏🙂

✝️ dies without the lies😂😂 💯☑️☑️☑️

1- The narration of Aysha RAA indicated that Suratul-Ahzab was 200 Ayat is a weak narration. It was narrated through (Ibn Luhaya’ah) and his narrations are rejected. 2- The narration of Ubay Ibn Ka’ab that he forgot 70 Ayat of the same Surah in which he couled not find is another weak narration. It was narrated through (Abdullah Inb Shuraik Al-A’amiry) and many scholars of Hadith do not recognize him as a trustworthy narrator. So, when he narrates what contradicts the consensus of whole Ummah regarding the number of the Ayat of Suratul-Ahzab, obviously, his narration is denied, as millions of Muslims nowadays memorize Suratul-Ahzab with their uninterrupted chain of trustworthy narrators that goes back to the Prophet SAAW Himself. They are unanimous that this Surah counts 73 Ayat only.

So allah is uncertain that he has to abrogate his earlier revelations? Sounds like muhammad's plot twist to me.

The problem with being a non Arab is the most incriminating sources are out of reach and of translated we're at the mercy of the incredibly biased translators for example there should be an entire section of Muhammad getting caught sleeping with Maria Al qibbtiyya as an explanation to a verse in ibn kathir tafsirs but in the English translation it's non existent. So Adam much appreciation for tearing down the language barrier

Thank you, Adam. Wish I could scream your posts from hilltops so that this cult move closer to the status it deserves. Let's dispell all these cults, the sooner the better.

Even the hadiths say the Quran is imperfect. It acknowledges about the many missing surahs.

I actually found the missing verses, the very beginning of the Quran, behold Surah 0: "Once Upon A Time..."