The Birth of Quantum Mechanics 

Awesome, thank you! Your continuous support is much appreciated.

What do the Twistors of Roger Penrose and the Hopf Fibrations of Eric Weinstein and the "Belt Trick" of Paul Dirac have in common? In Spinors it takes two complete turns to get down the "rabbit hole" (Alpha Funnel 3D--->4D) to produce one twist cycle (1 Quantum unit). Can both Matter and Energy be described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature? (A string is revealed to be a twisted cord when viewed up close.) Mass= 1/Length, with each twist cycle of the 4D Hypertube proportional to Planck’s Constant. In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) If quarks have not been isolated and gluons have not been isolated, how do we know they are not parts of the same thing? The tentacles of an octopus and the body of an octopus are parts of the same creature. Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the constant exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. Therefore, the gluon is a synthetic particle (zero mass, zero charge) invented to explain the Strong Force. The "Color Force" is a consequence of the XYZ orientation entanglement of the twisted tubules. The two twisted tubule entanglement of Mesons is not stable and unwinds. It takes the entanglement of three twisted tubules to produce the stable proton.....

Thanks for your kind words. It really fills me with joy knowing that some people find new little pieces of knowledge through my videos.

agreed, you should keep going, some of us loved it😢

Agreed, I can't wait for the next one

Also keep in mind, every video/article/p-set/textbook-chapter/etc. is a unique way of encoding and remembering & retrieving that relevant interlinked knowledge. So every unique presentation of information can have the capacity to provide its own original & genuinely impactful nugget of insight. What you’re presenting & providing is important

True, in hindsight all the ideas and calculation seem so simple, but the conceptual jumps to get there is what makes these ideas and equations so valuable. I find most accounts of these stories to focus on the final result but I find the problems, the struggles, and the wild guesses fascinating and decided to share them here. Glad to find so many people moved by these stories and that don't shy away from some taste of the math behind.

​@@jkzero Indeed, there are many of us physics nerds who actually value the history and all the wild guesses that contributed to the formation of currently accepted theories. There are too many books that explain the phenomena but people like me also enjoy understanding the motivation behind them and the theories of the time when they were formulated

@@gametimewitharyan6665 When I was a physics student I learned the solutions to the problems of the time but I remember that the lack of context and details was quite unsatisfactory. Now that I have time, I decided to dig deeper, read parts of the original papers, and I decided to share the details and found that the stories get even more fascinating.

Thanks, I am glad you liked the content. This is precisely the audience that I have attempted to reach: physics enthusiasts that don't shy away from some math and people with scientific background who might value some historical details. I personally was never told all the dramas and interesting human aspects of these stories during my studies.

Glad you think so! This is precisely the audience that I have attempted to reach: physics enthusiasts that don't shy away from some math and people with scientific background who might value some history details. I personally was never told all the dramas and interesting human aspects of these stories during my studies.

I am grateful for the appreciation, this really drives me to keep making these videos. I find these stories fascinating and it is great to find others who value them too. You can help by liking so that the videos can discovered by the mighty algorithm.

Thanks fro your comment. This is precisely my purpose. I know that these stories can be found in books but showing some of the key calculations makes the viewer experience the joy of discovery thanks to mathematics. Moreover, there are many false narratives that I find useful to clarify because it shows that there were people who made guesses, made mistakes, guessed again, and some got it right. Where in the US are based, if I might ask? This is another yes, relativity!

I am grateful for the appreciation, this really drives me to keep making these videos. I find these stories fascinating and it is great to find others who value them too. You can help by liking so that the videos can discovered by the mighty algorithm.

Thank you so much for your kind words, I hope you check the other videos in this series.

Thanks, I am glad you liked the video. I was so happy to see a large portrait of Röntgen in the waiting room of the hospital. Other viewers wrote below that in Denmark, Russia, and the Netherlands they also use this name. Thanks for sharing

thanks, it was a risky move to try other topics but I think that there are so many fascinating stories that deserve more visibility plus too many false narratives about how things are today. I understand that textbooks cannot cover all this material because they need to get to point but this is why I am happy to create this content filling gaps in the history sprinkled with some fun calculations.

@@jkzero That's what I like about this format! I can learn about the history in a more relaxed way, whilst not consuming a completely dumbed down version (without any calculations, and which only presents analogies instead of the actualy concepts) because the more popular channels want as many views as they can get. Despite the fact that this content may not be as popular with the general public, I'm sure that many physics/mathematics/engineering students will appreciate your content: the mathematics are not that advanced (realistically, up to some vector analysis/differential equations) and the quality is extremely high.

@@eternex4983 thanks for sharing that. I was unsure about including math in my early videos, I tested the waters slowly and discovered that many people are do not shy away from some math that can be followed.

​@@eternex4983 High schools students too enjoy his content whole heartedly

Thanks, I am glad you liked the video. There are several votes for a detailed analysis of the relativity paper

Great to hear! I am glad you liked the video. I am always curious to know what brings viewers to the channel, were you searching for something in particular or did the 'mighty algorithm' find you?

@@jkzero was the algorithm. I also read a lot of physics and stuff. To be honest, I'm also one of those types who builds personal physics theories as a hobby. So, I like to make sure I'm compiling info from good sources. Your video is very good!

@@chem7553 Thanks for sharing and I am glad the algorithm is working, I hope you find the other videos of interest too and welcome to the channel.

I am glad you find the content of interest, I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I always open to collecting suggestions, thanks.

Thanks for watching and the positive feedback. Welcome to the channel.

A few years back I was teaching modern physics for PhD students and discovered that none of them had read a single paper by Einstein; this is OK for the general public but, physicists? I find it good to give visibility to this content and why not making accessible to general public? The stories are indeed fascinating so yeah, more stories coming! Saludos a chilito. ¿De dónde escribes?

@@jkzero Desde Concepción, gracias por preguntar!

@@Javy_Chand saludos a Conce (yo soy de Talca)

Thanks for the comment. A few years back I was teaching modern physics for PhD students and discovered that none of them had read a single paper by Einstein; this is OK for the general public but physicists? I find it good to give visibility to this content and why not making accessible to general public? The stories are indeed fascinating so yeah, more stories coming!

Awesome, thank you for the loyalty, more videos coming

Thank you so much for your kind feedback. I always enjoyed teaching, I was fortunate to teach for over a decade at undergraduate and graduate levels, and that is what I miss the most from my former academic life, the creation of this channel was a way to get this desire of talking about physics out. Another reason for this channel was that I saw so many videos on physics that perpetuate false narratives that every time I felt like "I would have explained that differently" so after postponing it for years I decided to give it a try last summer, and the response from viewers has been overwhelmingly positive, I am very grateful for that.

Except that this isn't about physics but about science history. Not the same thing. As a PhD you should know that. If you had read Einstein's paper on the photoelectric effect, you would also know that he has a real bummer of a mistake in there. He calls photons "quanta of energy" but then he identifies them immediately (and without any experimental evidence) with Newtonian corpuscles. That's his actual biggest mistake. He never managed to get rid of that false mental image in his mind, as far as I can tell.

Thanks, I take that as a great compliment. I am just getting started and more videos coming.

They saw clear signs of quantum mechanics as early as the beginning of the 19th century (Frauenhofer lines in 1814). They simply couldn't explain them. Even more basic evidence for quantum mechanics, like the periodic table of elements and the stability or matter or the existence of permanent magnets happens to be even "harder" to explain in terms of theory. There was a lot of confusion in physics for over a century because the known data didn't fit any of the known theory. Today we are suffering from the opposite problem. We have far too little data that doesn't fit. With exception of quantum gravity (which is a hypothetical to begin with) and a few cosmological data points for which no high quality data exists we have theory for basically everything.

I cannot thank you enough for your continuous support. The only way, I guess, is by keeping the videos coming. Thank you so much!

​​@@jkzero hey can you do some video on Maxwell? He was so influential and impactful but currently underrated by the public.

Glad you think so! This is precisely the audience that I have attempted to reach: physics enthusiasts that don't shy away from some math and people with scientific background who might value some historical details. I personally was never told all the dramas and interesting human aspects of these stories during my studies.

Many thanks!

Poincaré was one of the great ones and I think everyone in the physics community agrees that if Einstein had not existed then Poincaré would have done all the work on relativity anyway.

Many romanticize scientists, however science is very rigid, it does not matter who did it first, the important thing is that it is correct.

​@@onihanzo2495 humans are not science, we can still tell if something is unfair.

​​@@onihanzo2495science is a product of humans, and wouldn't exist without our curiosity and capacity for wonder, astonishment, reason, etc. I think if anything should be romanticized or lionized its the giants whose shoulders we stand on. If scientists weren't revered and respected and science wasn't romanticized I'm guessing our ideas might be a lot less correct than they are now lol

thanks for the vote of confidence, I am glad that my style is so positively perceived. I was lucky enough to teach from high-school to undergrads and all the way to master and PhD students and I use this channel as a way to share these stories that I loved telling my students but never had enough time for. More stories coming, hopefully some that are less know for the general public.

Glad you enjoyed it

you are right, this is why I wanted to dedicate a full video to Einstein but leaving relativity aside, the general public only knows about his work o relativity and his other contributions deserve to reach wider audiences

@@jkzeroIf I remembered he even had a patent?

@@GeoffryGifari yeah, Einstein filled a patent for a refrigerator with Leo Szilard en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Einstein_refrigerator

Thanks for watching and the positive feedback. Yeah, more stories coming!

noted, another vote for special relativity paper

thanks, I am glad you liked the follow-up, there is now another cliffhanger: experimental validation comes next, it comes with nice calculations and some drama between big egos... stay tuned

Thanks for watching and the positive feedback. Welcome to the channel. Next part coming soon

I am glad you find the content of interest, I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I always open to collecting suggestions, thanks.

muchas gracias por tu comentario y por la sugerencia; he evaluado la posibilidad de usar Patron, sin embargo sus pólizas y condiciones son un poco estrictas para mi gusto y su cobro de un 12% por donación me parece muy elevado. Ko-fi, al contrario, no tiene requisitos y su cobro es 0%. A propósito de masa crítica ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-LduH7613QXw.html :)

thanks for the reference, I was not aware of this textbook, I will check it out

Thanks for the vote of confidence and the good wishes. You can help by liking so that the videos can discovered by the mighty algorithm

another vote for deep dive on Einstein, thanks

True, in hindsight all the ideas and calculation seem so simple, but the conceptual jumps to get there is what makes these ideas and equations so valuable. I find most accounts of these stories to focus on the final result but I find the problems, the struggles, and the wild guesses fascinating and decided to share them here. Glad to find so many people moved by these stories and that don't shy away from some taste of the math behind.

Thanks, will do!

Thanks for watching!

another vote for Einstein's special relativity paper, noted and it will likely come in the near future

Most people know about Einstein but not many can describe why he is such an icon beyond relativity, I hope to be able to show other great things he did and, more importantly, that he presented bold ideas with a clearly defined framework, supported by mathematics, and making clear predictions. These days any crackpot believes he is the new Einstein because can put words together and post them online.

I hope to get there at some point. I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I always open to collecting suggestions, thanks.

thanks for the feedback, I am glad you liked it. The follow-up coming soon

Muito obrigado pela sua mensagem, vamos chegar aos 100 mil subscritores em breve! Li a sua mensagem durante um voo de ligação em São Paulo e usei DeepL para responder. Saudações ao Brasil.

more coming for sure, I am having a blast making these videos and with the overwhelmingly positive feedback, I just ask for likes and comments to attract the attention of the 'mighty algorithm'

O, now I see someone already mentioned the Dutch word for X-rays 😅 Very kind you read and answered all the comments. I hope your succes will be so great that one day you can't answer them all...

Thanks, and thanks for sharing. I was so happy to see a large portrait of Röntgen in the waiting room of the hospital. Other viewers wrote below that in Denmark, Russia, Sweden, and the Netherlands they also use this name. On your suggestion, yeas, I plan to cover relativity in the future, not right now. I have already a list of videos to make, I just asked because I like to plan ahead. Even some mix of classical mechanics is coming too.

I appreciate your supportive comment. Answering is getting harder and harder, I miss many, I repeat myself in others, but I do my best. I created this channel to interact with people and it is great that it is not a one-way street. Again, thanks for your supporting words and thanks fro watching.

Thanks again for watching!

muchas gracias, de verdad que disfruto demasiado haciendo estos videos y ha sido tremendo encontrar una audiencia que los valora. ¿De dónde escribes?

@@jkzero Desde Chile! Compartí (y compartiré) tu canal con quiénes conozco 🙌🏻

@@pabloealvarez wow, saludos a chilito

​@@jkzero escribí en español, ya que vi que en un foro escribías en español. Si manejas bien el español, podría ser una buena idea agregar la opción de audio en ambos idiomas y así llegar a más gente en latinoamerica 🙌🏻

gracias por la sugerencia; consideré hace un tiempo crear una versión en español de cada video pero como RU-vid ofrece subtítulos automáticos en todos los idiomas pensé que no sería necesario el trabajo extra. Las estadísticas me muestran muchas vistas desde Latinoamérica usando los subtítulos automáticos por lo que al parecer eso es suficiente por ahora.

a few years back I was teaching modern physics for PhD students and discovered that none of them had read a single paper by Einstein; this is OK for the general public but physicists? I find it good to give visibility to this content and why not making accessible to general public? The stories are indeed fascinating so yeah, more stories coming!

Thanks for the vote of confidence and the good wishes. Viewrs can help by liking so that the videos can discovered by the mighty algorithm

I am totally with you. As a physics student I learned the solutions to the problems of the time but I remember that the lack of context and details was quite unsatisfactory. I decided to dig deeper, read parts of the original papers, and I decided to share the details and get the record straight. I think that the story gets even more fascinating. The follow-up with experiments is also quite interesting. Coming soon.

Thanks for the vote of confidence and the good wishes, I am glad you find the content of value

me too; I think this would take time but great suggestion. I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I am always open to collecting suggestions, thanks

Very much agree. Statistical mechanics is woefully underrepresented in most mainstream discussions of physics because it's not really as 'flashy' as relativity or quantum mechanics, which is a shame because it's one of the most universally useful areas of physics.

that's right, quantization and probabilistic interpretation are not the same things, despite the incorrect hand wavy "explanations" that popular physics books try to use, which cause more confusion. Also, Einstein was totally fine with probability distributions for describing physical systems, this was already in use since Boltzmann introduced statistical mechanics. Einstein was fine with wave functions, probability amplitudes, and all that jazz, he was dissatisfied with the measurement problem, but I am getting ahead of the story.

I find most accounts of these stories to focus on the final result but I find the problems, the struggles, and the wild guesses fascinating and decided to share them here. Glad to find so many people moved by these stories and that don't shy away from some taste of the math behind.

I really appreciate your kind words, more content coming soon

Glad you liked it! New to the channel?

@@jkzero Yes, I subscribed around 1 week ago after seeing 3-4 videos about physics/math. Well produced.

@@simonstrandgaard5503 Thanks for sharing and coming back, I hope you find the other videos of interest too and welcome to the channel.

you are not alone, I was never told all these details during my undergrad nor my grad studies. A few years back I was teaching modern physics for PhD students and discovered that none of them had read a single paper by Einstein so this appears to be a trend everywhere; this is OK for the general public but physicists? I find it good to give visibility to this content and why not making accessible to general public? The stories are indeed fascinating so yeah, more stories coming! Did you watch the previous video about Planck and the blackbody radiation?

@@jkzero I saw your video Planck blackbody radiation when if first appeared on my youtube home page, and I then subscribed. That was very good. Every undergrad should watch that one as well. These two videos dove tail right into each other. Makes a natural progression of the development of QM

Thanks for sharing and I am glad the algorithm is working, I hope you find the other videos of interest too and welcome to the channel.

I had not thot - WHAT???

Thanks for subbing! Thanks for watching this and the previous video. More coming, this one ended on a cliffhanger. I am always curious to know what brings viewers to the channel, were you searching for something in particular or did the 'mighty algorithm' find you?

@@jkzero , I think the algorithm found me. Once I started watching the video about Planck, I knew I've found a very nice channel.

@@pedrovictorc Thanks for sharing and I am glad the algorithm is working, I hope you find the other videos of interest too and welcome to the channel.

Thanks, I am glad you liked the video and thanks for the suggestion. I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I am always open to collecting suggestions, thanks

Thanks for watching, I am glad you liked the videos. Yes, special and general relativity are definitely coming in the near future.

I am glad to trigger those types of desires. Old-school original papers can be sometimes challenging to read but they can also be gems

Planck saw in disbelief how Einstein took his energy quantization and went overboard with it, just like Einstein later saw the new generation: Heisenberg, de Broglie, and Pauli going overboard with the new quantum mechanics

@@jkzero "Look at what these crazy kids are doing!"

@@douglasstrother6584 same vibes

I am glad you liked the video. Planck and Einstein were friendly colleagues, not sure if real friends, but Planck was who reviewed Einstein groundbreaking papers and accepted them for publication. He later recalled that he was not convinced of Einstein's ideas but since he couldn't poke holes to his arguments he published them for the physics community to evaluate them. Also it was Planck who requested the Prussian Academy to make Einstein a member. I do not know about Mary Fowler’s geophysics discovery of dark energy, could you point to some reference about this?

I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I always open to collecting suggestions, thanks.

Your continuous support is much appreciated. I will make sure to add a strudel to the coffee and bagel from last time while I edit the next video, which I am already scripting. Thanks again and greeting from the other side of the globe.

another vote for yes relativity

Thanks, I am glad you liked the video. The follow up to this story coming soon

Fantastic! I was so happy to see a large portrait of Röntgen in the waiting room of the hospital. Another viewer wrote below that in Russia they also use this name. Thanks for sharing.

I take this as a vote for yes relativity

@@jkzero oh yes . I Love your content by the way

@@dimadima5298 thanks, I appreciate that

Fantastic! I was so happy to see a large portrait of Röntgen in the waiting room of the hospital. Other viewers wrote below that in Russia and the Netherlands they also use this name. Thanks for sharing.

Thanks, I am glad you liked the content. This is precisely the audience that I have attempted to reach: physics enthusiasts that don't shy away from some math and people with scientific background who might value some history details. I personally was never told all the dramas and interesting human aspects of these stories during my studies.

I am glad you appreciate the effort to bring to life the process, making these videos take many hours but it is a lot fun

Thanks for watching and the positive feedback. I find most accounts of these stories to focus on the final result but I find the problems, the struggles, and the wild guesses fascinating and decided to share them here. Glad to find so many people moved by these stories and that don't shy away from some taste of the math behind.

Thanks for sharing and I am glad the algorithm is working, I hope you find the other videos of interest too and welcome to the channel.

noted, another vote for special relativity paper

glad you liked it, did you click the like button?

I am glad you value that point, I find it annoying when someone says "in this paper Einstein solved the photoelectric effect" when you only need to read the paper to see that the photoelectric effect is only one section of a way more important paper

I would fully agree with the statement on your book. Einstein is always portrayed as a quantum-hater but, as I hope I made clear using his own papers, that is far from the truth. And this is not my opinion, I am just analyzing the facts on his papers

He wasn't even a quantum hater, he just pointed out that it is not logically possible to define quantum mechanics as anything but a theory of weakly emergent properties of ensembles of systems, and any attempt to go beyond this requires adding additional metaphysical assumptions which don't exist in the mathematics but are just arbitrarily assumed and tacked onto quantum mechanics. People these days conflate metaphysical constructions around quantum mechanics, such as collapsing probability waves or cats that can be both dead and alive simulatenously, as literally equivalent to the mathematics of quantum theory itself and to deny it is being a "quantum-hater." Einstein just tears this to shreds and points out you cannot speak of the state of individual systems without making metaphysical assumptions which are not entailed in the actual mathematics of the theory, and so he was dubious of these kinds of metaphysical stories that go beyond what quantum mechanics actually is, especially when many of them don't even make any coherent sense. Einstein was still right on this, but people sweep it under the rug and pretend like somehow Bell's theorem proves him wrong, when all Bell's theorem shows is that Einstein's hope of a hidden variable theory without nonseparability likely cannot work. Einstein was not opposed to nonlocality per se, but nonseparability, which he viewed nonseparability as an inevitable consequence of nonlocality. The EPR paper never even discusses locality, only separability. His concern with nonseparability was that it goes against the principles of reductionism, and he argued that he was not sure how the physical sciences could proceed if you could not even in principle isolate systems from one another. I only point out this distinction because I'm not really sure superdeterminism even addresses Einstein's concerns, as superdeterminism requires you to assume nonseparability as well. However, even prior to Bell's theorem, there were people who agreed with Einstein's philosophical interpretation of quantum mechanics but disagreed with is belief in separability. An obvious example of Dmitry Blokhintsev who criticized Einstein's paper where he explains why he believes in the principle of locality, arguing it is on shaky philosophical grounds, and Blokhintsev also insisted we should just accept the universe will appear fundamentally random on the smallest scales of individual particles. Despite this, he still endorsed Einstein's interpretation of quantum mechanics not being about individual systems but about weakly emergent properties from ensembles of systems. A contemporary physicist. Anthony Rizzi also in a similar way wrote a paper endorsing Einstein's interpretation while rejecting separability in response to the PBR theorem. People who don't actually understand Bell's theorem or what Einstein actually wrote like to lump Einstein's hope that we might one day have a theory that replaces quantum mechanics with his interpretation of quantum mechanics. Even Einstein was open to the idea that maybe we could never isolate a fundamental cause and the universe was random, but only argued that this was not proven so it was still reasonable to search for a cause. People act like Bell's theorem, because it disproved Einstein's hope for a hidden variable theory with separability, that his whole philosophical interpretation of quantum mechanics has apparently been "debunked," even though it is just as correct today as ever, and if only more people understood what Einstein was trying to say, there would be a lot less confusion around quantum mechanics.

Thanks, I am glad you liked the video series. I am always curious to know what brings viewers to the channel, were you searching for something in particular or did the 'mighty algorithm' find you?

@@jkzero The way I found your video was simply through the algorithm, but I've watched your Planck video twice now. I'm a post-grad in physics and I've always been interested in the history, especially HOW these scientists I've heard so much about came up with the beautiful theories we study. I've always known that the textbooks utterly butcher the timeline and present facts in a very straightforward way, which would've never entered these scientists' mind when they came up with it. So, the way you presented the chronology and the events that led up to it, really fascinated me and made me subscribe ever since the Planck video.

@@abhijithcpreej Thanks for sharing and I am glad the algorithm is working. As a physics student I learned the solutions to the problems of the time but I remember that the lack of context and details was quite unsatisfactory. I decided to dig deeper, read parts of the original papers, and I decided to share the details and get the record straight. I think that the story gets even more fascinating. The follow-up with experiments is also quite interesting. Coming soon, I hope you find the other videos of interest too and welcome to the channel.

@@jkzero Absolutely! I'm really looking forward to your future videos. I remember only recently finding out about how Einstein actually came up with the theory of relativity, and how Lorentz came up with the space and time transformations even before that. Frankly, those kinds of stories make me realise how genius these people actually were. In this video, I was actually hoping to see more about Frank Hertz's experiments and his sidenote on an experiment which turned out to be the photoelectric effect!

@@abhijithcpreej a series of videos on experimental validations of quantum hypotheses is what comes next.

you wanna make one don't you... be honest...

added to the list, I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I am always open to collecting suggestions

In any case, thank you for your response to my comment. I have been with you since you had a few subscribers to the channel. I knew that the number of subscribers would reach thousands and will millions. Good luck.​@@jkzero

​@@enricobianchi4499😅 I will try

@@omargaber3122 thanks sticking from the beginning, explosions and nuclear weapons wsa a topic that I always wanted to cover just because I find the physics involved fascinating; however, to be honest I have always been hooked by the early times, I never followed the late developments of the super and beyond.

another vote for relativity

Thanks so much for supporting me to keep making these videos!

Thanks so much for your generous support

Thanks, I am glad you liked the video. I am always curious to know what brings viewers to the channel, were you searching for something in particular or did the 'mighty algorithm' find you?

I cannot guarantee to be able to fulfill all the requests but I always open to collecting suggestions, thanks.

@@jkzero Its ok, I understand

I like the spirit

let's make that happen!

Thanks, and thanks for sharing. I was so happy to see a large portrait of Röntgen in the waiting room of the hospital. Other viewers wrote below that in Denmark, Russia, Sweden, and the Netherlands they also use this name.

I am glad you liked the video, make sure to check the others in this series, and more coming soon ru-vid.com/group/PL_UV-wQj1lvVxch-RPQIUOHX88eeNGzVH

@@jkzero So looking forward to it. I love all the small details. Getting a feel for the doubts the great minds had, while figuring this stuff out. It's actually a sanity check for our lectures, where the profs state this stuff, as it all were obious facts

Thanks, I am glad you liked the video. I try to stay from team Einstein lovers and team Einstein haters, I thing the guy was brilliant and by today's standard could have won half a dozen of Nobel Prizes. His contributions were remarkable and his insights revolutionary. But also, instead of my opinion, I present the facts from the papers that anyone can go a read to make these stories more compelling.

Light doesn't act as a particle. Einstein got that part completely wrong. It's almost 120 years later... no need for you to repeat his mistake endlessly.

The truth is always more complicated

it took me almost a full day to get the joke, my bad, I should have sooner