The Breitling Colt Chronograph Quartz Watch A7338811.C905.173A 

This Colt is from around 2016 onwards.

You are very welcome

Let me get this straight to you - this watch is NOT 43mm (as Mark claims it to be in one comment) and its also NOT 38mm as you think it is. This watch is 41mm in diameter with a lug gap of 20mm (not 22mm like Mark says in the video, LEARN TO USE A F-KING CALIPER MARK) Its reference number is A73380 and its a chronometer-certified watch which means that it supposedly should keep plus/minus 10 seconds per year (as Breitling themselves claim) Lil ol' Mark shared so much wrong information (for which you thanked him lmao) and he even forgot to mention the split time option on the chronograph. Mark if you read this please stick to just sharing how much you like/dislike the watches you review and never ever talk about measurements before you learn to use a CALIPER (or a fucking ruler) because for a watch even two millimeters is a great difference like night and day.

@@thewolfhimself4867 There’s so much passion in this comment. Thank you for this constructive comment I sure will use your wisdom.

@@thewolfhimself4867 I am not sure what watch you are talking about but the back of my Colt (which appears to be the exact watch reviewed) says right on the case back A73388 and at the Jewelers we brought up the Breitling website and the case measurement from that site says 44mm. The Breitling website also states that the lug measurement is 22mm (Inside lug to lug) Even if you were right, which your not, at least about the watch on my wrist, which again…appears to be the same exact watch in the video, should you be such a prick about it…which is so easy these days with made up names!

@@randyhiggins4086 Maybe i got the models wrong or maybe you should learn to use a caliper. Oh you don't know what a caliper is? Tragedy. I never said anything rude, only that Mark is wrong. I have this watch and appart of it being 41mm with 20mm lug gap (because I have a caliper) the website also supports those measurements. Now Im not really sure if its me or him who is wrong but what I do know is that I didnt saw a caliper anywhere in the video. Have a good day sir and use the new knowledge that I just gave you to your benefit, a caliper's appliance is much more wider than just measuring wristwatches.

No, there appears to be two exact same watches of this model but the first goes by number A73380 and the other goes by number A73388 (last digit is 8 instead of 0) so basically both models are the same except for the size, which in your case is 41mm and in Mark's video is the larger model which is 44mm and yes its quite large and heavy as i've had 44mm watches and they wear pretty big, not to mention heavy.

I would always go automatic 👍

Do not listen to this guy, he doesnt even know the measurements of his own watch. Automatics keep terrible time and knowing Tag Heuer you'll probably have to set the time on your watch every 3-6 days because it will be one minute fast. Automatics require expensive service every 3 years and break more easily, ignore all the petty watch snobs who vomit all their *"automatic is better because its a little machine and the watch has a heart"* bullshit, I've had my share of automatics and nothing beats quartz, the sacrifice you go through with an auto is NOT worth it.

Cannot stand Tag Heuer

@@joshjnap that’s weird. I wonder why. Their designs are crisp and modern looking and cheaper the Breitling.

I am not sure. It may have been discontinued. Since they have moved to a new dial emblem.

yes, they discontinued this model. I got mine in Costa Rica in 2015. Love it!

The Victorinox maverick with the red bezel has the same movement

@@markcoffman494 i really wanna replace my fucking vintage piece of shit Bulova Marine Star 4.071.4.0.04 chrono with a new chrono of the same engine, but at an affordable price.

Yes silver

I believe it’s 43mm

@@markcoffman494 thank you

@@jh5064 Thank you my ass, this watch is 41mm in diameter and there is NO other larger/smaller versions of it. Ref number A73380

@@thewolfhimself4867 ref number is A73388 you chump. Check the back of it

My apologizes

@@markcoffman494 I have the same model but in black. It's a hidden gem of a watch, beautiful symmetry of the dial compared to the automatic or three hand quartz versions. 👍

@@apangurra2775 you prefer the symmetry of the sub dials? I prefer them all to be a bit lower like on the chronomat. This makes the logo look squashed.