The BRILLIANT and Compelling Case for Papal Infallibility Explained by a Catholic Apologist 

Thanks to WLC for having me study the Canaanite slaughter. If Israel is the church, then the leader Moses, represents the Pope. Moses has a successor, Joshua, as this becomes very important especially in the complete slaughter of Northern Canaan. Without the structure of the one nation under one central authority, the Canaanite slaughter would have never occurred based on "scripture alone". We know this since in Genesis 8 "though mankind is evil since it's youth, never again will I destroy mankind as I have done". If Joshua was not given the authority under God and the "bible alone" is the only authority, then the Canaanite destruction, was in complete error of God, and Israel would not have it's own nation, and that begs the question would have Jesus even existed. I can get rid of all the bible after Judges, and the reality would always be that the best way to efficiently run any organization is to have one unified body, under one leader, with a successor, who follows the same protocol as the previous. The RCC is the only church that follows the bible the way it is written.

I must have missed something. As far as I know, and I looked it up, infallibility is "the inability to be wrong". Mr. Akin does explain/justify the leadership position of the Pope, but, IMHO, he does not address the aspect of 'infallibility'. Please correct me if I am wrong.