Тёмный

The Builder Pattern Explained and Implemented in Java | Creational Design Patterns | Geekific 

Geekific
Подписаться 31 тыс.
Просмотров 71 тыс.
50% 1

Support us on Patreon: / geekific
GitHub Repository: github.com/geekific-official/...
Stay updated on our videos by subscribing to the channel and hitting the like button!
The pattern we cover in this video is a famous one and was actually mentioned several times during our previous videos. This pattern goes by: The Builder Pattern.
Timestamps:
00:00 Introduction
00:16 What is the Builder Pattern?
01:40 The Simple Builder
03:28 Builders and Directors
06:06 Builder Class Diagram
06:35 Recap
07:27 Thanks for Watching!
If you found this video helpful, check other Geekific uploads:
- Introduction to Design Patterns: • What are Design Patter...
- The Factory Method Pattern Explained and Implemented in Java: • The Factory Method Pat...
- The Abstract Factory Pattern Explained and Implemented in Java: • The Abstract Factory P...
- The Singleton Pattern Explained and Implemented in Java: • The Singleton Pattern ...
- Object-Oriented Programming Fundamentals: • What is Object-Oriente...
- SOLID Principles and Best Practices: • SOLID Design Principle...
#Geekific #DesignPatterns #BuilderPattern #CreationalPatterns

Опубликовано:

 

30 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 73   
@VivekDudani
@VivekDudani 11 месяцев назад
Glad I found this series. Such a clear, crisp and step by step process of explaining different concepts. Thank you ❤.
@1CheeseBurger
@1CheeseBurger 8 месяцев назад
Delivered with such quality and clarity. Gold.
@NguyenTrang-je6zg
@NguyenTrang-je6zg 6 месяцев назад
for those who got error at 2:00, each of the setter method should return this, so that you can call method chaining in main
@mahanirvaantantra
@mahanirvaantantra 5 месяцев назад
Ideally it should NOT return this, instead the return type should be changed to void. As we are making changes to the object our purpose is not to return anything new. And in creating the car object in the builder class, these variables should be like this.id, this.brand, this.model, etc, because these are object methods...
@TheEmbustil
@TheEmbustil 5 месяцев назад
or abstract
@masterflitzer
@masterflitzer 5 месяцев назад
@@mahanirvaantantra with void you can't do chaining...
@mahanirvaantantra
@mahanirvaantantra 5 месяцев назад
@@masterflitzer Yes. That's true. But for chaining he should have return 'this' or 'self'(in python). He didn't have it
@Felipinho5
@Felipinho5 10 дней назад
Wonderful explanation!
@svalyavasvalyava9867
@svalyavasvalyava9867 Месяц назад
Wonderful explanation. Thank you! 😊
@SerhiiArtymovych
@SerhiiArtymovych 18 дней назад
Great series! Thank you!
@enishalilaj9309
@enishalilaj9309 Год назад
One of the best videos I've seen regarding this topic so far! Great work!
@bjorn1409
@bjorn1409 Год назад
agreed
@thatwasamazing2791
@thatwasamazing2791 7 месяцев назад
Best explanation I’ve come across
@abdielortega9778
@abdielortega9778 2 месяца назад
I loved the explanations 🥰
@joostvandam8624
@joostvandam8624 3 месяца назад
great video!
@FarazAzadi
@FarazAzadi 9 месяцев назад
Thanks a lot 🙏 If you want to use chain function calls, you should return "this" to return the object itself. ( It's forgotten in code. )
@FarhanKhan
@FarhanKhan Год назад
superb explanation ... thanks for making the video
@Gopalisaac
@Gopalisaac 2 года назад
This series is so clear and concise. There's great explanation, clear code and a relevant UML diagram which matches the code.
@Gopalisaac
@Gopalisaac 2 года назад
Just some add-on, it'll be awesome if you could add sequence diagram. Cheers
@geekific
@geekific 2 года назад
Thanks a lot! Glad you liked it :)
@royalzsoftware
@royalzsoftware 7 месяцев назад
Great! Thanks for sharing. Really clear, keep up with these videos
@ulfdellbrugge827
@ulfdellbrugge827 Год назад
Great. I don't like real world examples like Cars but I still understood the concept very well even with audio only.
@ivandrofly
@ivandrofly 9 месяцев назад
Top video on builder pattern
@nafiislam498
@nafiislam498 Год назад
Awesome explaination
@jpelegrinotube
@jpelegrinotube Год назад
These series are great, I have watched many videos and studied books about design patterns but these videos are engaging me. Excelente work!!!
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
Glad you like them! Thank you :)
@Labandusette
@Labandusette 3 месяца назад
very good
@tb7377
@tb7377 2 года назад
At 2:00 the signature of the methods inside CarBuilder does not match the code. For example method id does not return a CarBuilder
@geekific
@geekific 2 года назад
You are right! I think I missed them because they were pretty obvious in my head :D Anyway thanks for pointing that out! Cheers :)
@ryankao1983
@ryankao1983 2 года назад
crystal clear video thank you
@geekific
@geekific 2 года назад
Glad you like it :)
@Ellefsen97
@Ellefsen97 5 месяцев назад
I like the Builder Pattern in some usecases, but the usecase would need to be justified imo. I would rarely use it in place of a constructor, if ever. Let's say that the constructor has 10 properties and we want to create 1 million cars. Instead of performing ~11 operations (calling constructor, setting the 10 properties), we need to perform ~3 operations per property (calling the build method, setting the property and return the Builder). It won't matter in most scenarios, but in this hyperbolic example the CPU would do approximately 11 million operations in the constructor example and 33 million in the builder example. Having long constructors is also rarely an issue since we just use variables as arguments: new Car(id, brand, make, doors, engine, ...). Then we can just make the optional properties nullable. I'm only critiquing it's usecase for being a replacement for constructors. It can be very useful in certain usecases like the StringBuilder, DateTimeFormatter etc. It's also useful when you want to chain modify default/set properties, like the Locale: Locale locale = builder.setLanguage("en").setRegion("US").build(); I love using the Builder Pattern in this scenario. We can change all the properties that we want in one line, and we can ignore the Locale properties that we want to leave as default.
@Captinofthemudslayer
@Captinofthemudslayer Год назад
Theses patterns seem overly complicated for no reason
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
When you apply them on simple examples they do!
@razorblade413
@razorblade413 Год назад
I'm starting to learn some patterns like state or memento. While those are useful, I honestly found this one overly complicated, because if the constructor has so many parameters why not just create an empty constructor and then populates the objects fields calling the setters methods like? Car car = new Car(); car.setBrand("Something"); // other setters fields that you want to initialize... car.setHeight(1.5); instead of using all those new classes?
@caballerosalas
@caballerosalas 11 месяцев назад
Isolation
@youme1461
@youme1461 6 месяцев назад
@@razorblade413because of immutability, if you want to make a property immutable, builder is the way to do it. With setters it’s not possible
@tulasidamarla
@tulasidamarla Месяц назад
@@razorblade413 This approach has a flaw. The object's are always mutable, whereas if you use builder, the objects returned from it are immutable. This is explained by joshua bloch in effective java.
@michaelfulton1080
@michaelfulton1080 Год назад
Thanks :)
@clement1370
@clement1370 2 года назад
Thx for this Pattern ! 😀
@geekific
@geekific 2 года назад
You're welcome 😊
@user-fs1ze5lr8d
@user-fs1ze5lr8d 2 года назад
Thanks, I'm Japanese. I can't understand English almost. But this video is perfect. I could understand builder pattern on this video than reading a textbook about gof in Japan. I admire you. thank you
@geekific
@geekific 2 года назад
Thanks a lot for the kind words :) Glad I could be of help!
@nirmalgurjar8181
@nirmalgurjar8181 Год назад
If you can't understand English then how are you writing it.
@user-fs1ze5lr8d
@user-fs1ze5lr8d Год назад
@@nirmalgurjar8181 I know English a little
@nirmalgurjar8181
@nirmalgurjar8181 Год назад
@@user-fs1ze5lr8d ok .. you can write perfectly..
@user-fs1ze5lr8d
@user-fs1ze5lr8d Год назад
@@nirmalgurjar8181 thanks
@cristianpalechor2011
@cristianpalechor2011 2 года назад
You are so awesome !!
@geekific
@geekific 2 года назад
And you rock
@jhonatandariomarinjaramill9519
thank you very much for the video, the build method should be put within the Builder interface, I thanks for the answer and again thank you very much for the video
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
You are welcome! Glad it helped :)
@jhonatandariomarinjaramill9519
@@geekific excuse me for the bad writing, I asked you if the build method should be put within the Builder interface in the previous message but I forgot the question mark (?), could you respond me that?¿the build method has to be within the Builder interface or not?
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
No worries :) Up to you! The basic ideas of the implementation will not change. Cheers!
@trocandobytes
@trocandobytes 5 месяцев назад
I loved you explanations, but in the builder class is missing "return this" without thit you cannot link the methods with '.'
@Thori45
@Thori45 Год назад
I have a question, I read in the internet that you can use a public static inner class as a Builder in the object you want to create to implement the Builder Pattern. Is this basically the same? What are the advantages / disadvantages doing it either way?
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
Yes you can do that, and on the larger scheme of things it won't really matter which option you pick. The main advantage of the inner class is the encapsulation of the construction logic within the class you are working with, leading to a more clean and concise code. However, it may increase the complexity as the class will be harder to understand if you are not familiar with the pattern, and may introduce some limitation in accessing private fields. Hope this helps :)
@chishikiendeavourer8663
@chishikiendeavourer8663 6 месяцев назад
If the builder is not a part of class representation then how can it call it's constructor. And if there is no getter method for the class, how the client will be able to access it's field.
@inkofthedragon
@inkofthedragon Год назад
Do you think the Builder Pattern could be an effective way to build different kinds of AiControllers with different behaviours/states and abilities, say for an Orc, Goblin, Troll, etc? Would the architecture flow look like? Thanks
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
I am not sure I understood 100%, but I will try to answer. If you have a common Character class let's say extended by several other classes (Orc, Goblin etc.) the builder pattern can indeed be used to initialize the objects based on these classes. Cheers!
@inkofthedragon
@inkofthedragon Год назад
@Geekific ok yes, so would i first have a Orc class and then an OrcBuilder class or a EnemyControllerBuilder class with methods like AddAbility, AddState, AddStat? And then inject in all the Abilities, Stats, States, etc? Then perhaps the EnemyControllerBuilder class would return a controller to the Orc class...and that would be the Orc? Thanks again
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
I don't really like creating builders for classes that do not exist. If you have only an Orc class then create one builder for it. If you have an Enemy class extended by the Orc class, then yeah you may have two builders and pass stuff from one to another.
@coolfyb
@coolfyb Год назад
CarBuilder instead of duplicating Car fields, can contain Car and set it's fields via setters (restricted)?
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
This will give you more flexibility and less coupling. Ex: If a Car's parameter is actually deduced from two other parameters that are not in the Car class, you can add these two params in the builder and the Car class doesn't need to know about them etc. Cheers!
@limitlesskode
@limitlesskode 9 месяцев назад
2:48 if the Car constructor is private how does the CarBuilder build method construct the car class?
@geekific
@geekific 9 месяцев назад
1/ Inner builders can still make use of it. 2/ In this video it is package-protected, and our builder sits in the same package (check this video: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-0-41SMoV_TA.html).
@JuanRamirez-fx3tf
@JuanRamirez-fx3tf 9 месяцев назад
How can you implement a builder in a children class? I only want to set some parameters of the parent class, and the id in the children class.
@geekific
@geekific 9 месяцев назад
By calling super() in the respective constructors.
@yatri6329
@yatri6329 Год назад
What is the meaning of making carSchema is this for to make different types of car like one implementation will make one kind of car and other is for different type. But this we can do inside director only. Than what is the meaning of carSchema. Plz explain
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
In this video carSchema was used to explain one advantage of using a Director, and it is storing the common initialization of multiple objects which in turn have builders that implement the same interface. Hope this answers your question!
@markos8383
@markos8383 Год назад
At 2:24 so basically we are just hiding the ugly part. We also need the constructor with those nulls.
@geekific
@geekific Год назад
But still it is a cleaner approach because in that constructor you always pass the variable, there is no mention of 'null' elements in your code.
Далее
He turned a baseball into a stylish shoe😱
00:59
Просмотров 939 тыс.
I Built a SECRET Soccer Field in My Room!
24:15
Просмотров 5 млн
Builder Pattern - Design Patterns
10:49
Просмотров 134 тыс.
8 Design Patterns | Prime Reacts
22:10
Просмотров 388 тыс.
5 Design Patterns That Are ACTUALLY Used By Developers
9:27
10 Design Patterns Explained in 10 Minutes
11:04
Просмотров 2,2 млн
He turned a baseball into a stylish shoe😱
00:59
Просмотров 939 тыс.