One very strong argument Author gave in this book which Is Kin Country Syndrome is important and the argument for this is that NATO extended only to the countries which are of western Christianity orthodox, which is a remarkable argument till to the date
Indeed the best book review I have ever come across. Sir you have, very well, explained the ideas and theories this book is revolving around. You're right sir "Clash of Civilization" must not be taken as the last word by the author of course, the book is needed to be read with a critical lens before conceding such ideas which are somehow appear pragmatic but after deeply understanding them they turn out to be quixotic.
The point which you emphasised is to come up with ones own analysis after carefully evaluating a theory is the main thing. I found this very important and is very close to reality but it doesn't come to everyone easily. One has to broaden his vision by evaluating each and every aspect of the theory/thesis or even a book.
I have sit through this book, and found that this theory feed more to the Offensive Realism rhetoric. Whilst gradual Critical Junctures (Black death, Sectarian conflict, Industrialization, Treaty of Westphalia) have led the way for civilization upheaval and downfall (Which book rebuff), The Clash of Civilizations banks on ideologies of religion and language, law & individualism/collectivism. Like Confucius, Islamic bloc, and Occident block (Christian) and Orient block (Confucius). His concept of Kemalism (Japan), Rejectionism (Early Japan 15th century, Africa, Islam), and Reformism (China) does hold in understanding of World Order.
Thank you Sir! I really appreciate your work for us, to keep us motivated and made us able to analyse every thing before perceiving the idea. Please make a video on What religion says about the worship places of contrary religions?
you should read book of dr Tahir hameed tanoli Maasir e Tahzibi kashmaksh aur fikr e Iqbal. he explains the clash of civilization in the light of Iqbal
The Clash of Civilisation, in my opinion, doesn’t really predict the reality rather it indicates the possibility of Clash of civilisation. The same thing that you said that there are traces of it like China shaking hands with the muslims and opposing the west. Plus, there will be a huge economic conflict coming up after the contract and limitations of Turkey ending in 2023, it will affect the world order in my opinion and the future policies of Turkey are gonna be really crucial. So, I, you along with many others can foresee that it might happen
Sir, I think you have missed yet another very important point that compelled Sammuel to write this specific paper, "The Clash of Civilization? in 1993. The point was that, another paper written by Francis Fukuyama in 1992 titled, "The End of History" argued that there is an end of political struggle among nations with Soviet fall and Communism and the Liberal democracy coupled with free market as the final form of government for all the nations of the world. Therefore, Sammuel refuted the theory of Francis by presenting his idea of Clash of Civilization which focused the role of religion in creating clash between world civilization in the years to come mainly Islam and Christianity.
Please summaries in urdu language (native) that easily we capture ,later we see the book in english for his purposes. Thank you sir for your great contribution.
But if you remember what Samuel said about turkey ? That he is holding a begging bowl and standing at the of EU , it's better if turkey can understand it's worth then it can become model Islamic state.
Sir thanks for this video your videos are very fruitful. Sir plzz make a video on difference between information and knowledge. I know sir you could explain it better than others.
There's no clash of civilization but only clash of interests. These interests can even causes clash between same religions, nations and even inside a family between two brothers. I don't believe this theory of clashes happenimg due to civilizations, particularly not in modern world.
Sir, don’t you think this theory deepened the apprehensions of West against Islam and other civilization, particularly the Muslims. This led to the conflicts of ideas, it blocked the channels of cooperation between these two civilizations. The invasion of Iraq, Afghanistan and other Muslims countries aren’t because of this fear? Similarly, Muslims hatred agains West that it is against Islamic values, culture and beliefs.
Your analysis in Urdu is more impressive I think you are talking on this topic in English language at some vey close one. It remember us English of Sk. Rasheed.
Sir apna experience share kare ap kbi 1 paper mcqs me fail howe hai kia . Or guide kre kis tara 1 papr mcqs me 70,80+ marks ly skty h or job secure kr skty h ..
