The fact that someone who barely knows anything about FNaF is more correct about the crying child's name (which does not exist) than most hardcore fans just shows how chronically online FNaF fans are.
I haven't laughed this hard in years. I, honest to god, want you to pitch a FNAF novel idea about a cursed sword filled with remnant and agony, along with a possessed suit of armor, haunting the hell out of a Medieval Times or a Sir Pizza.
That would be hilarious! I like to think that, since swords don’t have legs or anything, you can totally possess it but you can’t really do anything, so you’re just kinda stuck there
You know, I’ve heard soooooo many people and channels over the years try to explain the lore/story of the series. But this is by far the most straight forward, simplest and the hands down greatest explanation.
i can't believe you don't know the real name of the crying child. his full name is obviously oliver rodrigues fernando crying child jeffrey william peter griffin afton
Cassidy existed prior to crying child! In fnaf 2 theres the give gifts give life minigame where the puppet actually ties the souls of the dead kids to the robots, and theres a 5th child there, meaning that there were 5 kids in williams murder spree during the Missing children incident. So adding crying child as a soul in golden freddy when he didnt even die in it, unlike cassidy who was stuffed into it is the redundant factor
the book stories you defined as "having come out after the game" actually have been written during 2019, but not much people realize that so no wonder almost everyone misunderstand security breach's lore and turn it into a ridicolous story with robot kids
The FNaF story is simple, but only if you ignore all the things that contradict each other, doesn't make sense and are still unknown. The reason teorists and old fans say the lore is so complicated is because it was so hard to figure it out and include all the things which speak against a possible conclusion. For example: Altought many think that the crying child was the first who died, there are some things that contradict this, because he isn't afraid of the animatronics just because they look a bit scary. We know this because of fnaf 4 and a specific line: "Don't you remember what you saw?" which means the crying cild must have seen the animatronics doing something scary. This leads us to the animatronics of fnaf 4, because their stomaches are ripped open and especially nightmare fedbear's stomach has a row of teeth on It. These informations would lead us to the conclusion that elizabeth was the first who died (because baby's stomach ripped open when she killed her) and the crying child saw it. But if it happend that way, why would william have made these murderer animatronics in the first place? Well, maybe charlie died first and he wanted to understand remnant better... BUT then william hadn't had a motiv to kill her. The lore of fnaf has more of such things and those are the reasons it's called complicated, because figureing it out is hard, not understanding it. The story you just showed us is the most popular, but probaply not right. Still a nice video and I would definitely recommend it to people who are new to fnaf, but please don't call it "simple", it makes me wanna slap you. (Nothing against you, I really love your videos, just don't say it's simple if lore experts say it's confusing. Don't get me wrong, you couldn't have known better, just keep telling us what a bad mecanist william is and not about his family and business drama, there are already enough channels that cover this.)
The death order makes most sense to be Crying Child, Charlie, Serial Murdering, Elizabeth, maybe some more serial murdering. Reminder. "What is seen in the shadows is misunderstood in the mind of a child." He's scared of the suits not because of a previous death, he's scared of what happens in the shadows (which, shown in fnaf 4, was William helping a person into their suit. The belly thing makes perfect sense. You most definitely enter the suits from the middle. If CC saw that, it could easily be read as him thinking the belly ate someone) Also remember: Literally no one could have been around to see Elizabeth be murdered. Baby makes a massive point about keeping track of how many people were in the room and how she only attacked once one and only one child was in the room and there is no indication Baby was mistaken about this. (My personal theory with Elizabeth is that she didn't actually exist yet in fnaf4. More specifically, she wasn't born yet in the fnaf4 minigames. She was born soon after CC's death. And the Circus Baby's Pizza World stuff happened some time around fnaf2 (not exactly sure when exactly, I lean just a little after fnaf2 given the character designs in SL and fnaf2 and the mention of the recent closing of freddy's.) and immediately after Pizza World closed, Rentals opened and SL happened)
@@CuantumQ About the counting with baby, I don't think that she was able to see the crying child, because he always hides under the tables when an animatronic is near. A random kid in the minigames also says: "Aren't you the kid who always hides under the tabels and cries?" I don't believe William programmed baby to look under tabels, because kids would normally gather around her. The shadow theory could be true, but in the minigames we only see the head getting put on(and it's springbonnie, not fredbear) and if he had seen it somewhen before, he would have probably seen more than just the belly thing respectively nightmare fredbear needed to have teeth on his arms, legs and neck too. It's just odly specific that he has them only on his stomache and in a game where people compare the different shades of yellow of plush fredbear's lines, I don't believe it's just a coincidence. I think this line refers to the minigame where CC runs away from fredbear, because in the background we can see another fredbear and springbonnie which are in a dark shade/in the shadows. this is odd because we have two fredbears on screen and springbonnie as we know is with William backstage.(small detail: the person William helps in the suit is depicted in a normal light tone just like everyone that stands in the light, while those "fake animatronics" in the background are just dark silluetts) I believe CC has become so paranoid, that he sees adults in the light as animatronics.
3:55 Ok, I'm actually sitting in a rainforest cafe (not the franchise, just a local cafe in my part of town in Australia) and this freaked me out a little. And yes, they do sell brunch here!
Actually, Mike getting scooped is a big thing. So let's do this one last time: Mike was sent to the bunker by William to get his sister and free her (I assume is because William was almost about done with scrapping the OG 4). He went through crazy things down there and he was betrayed by his sister who was now Baby who was also at the time part of a mass of Freddy spaghetti called Ennard. They scooped him and after being worn as a suit for a few weeks maybe, he vomited them. At this point, he had nothing to lose, he couldn't die because of the remnant now coursing through his decaying body. This is why he revenge and atonement, he can no longer die but now that he was free from his fear of his father (I think he was afraid because he listened to his dad, who was suspected to be a murderer, ig he was afraid of being next? Idk) he would right the wrongs of him and his father, by killing them both and everyone touched by this madness.
I’m just here to correct the things that are wrong that I spot, and one of those things is remnant, which is just soul energy(sort of) it’s not the metal itself, and it’s proven because the Funtime animatronics kidnap for this reason to extract remnant from children
Glitchtrap isnt William Afton, its an AI called Mimic1, which was made to mimic Edwin to help him take care of his son. Edwin is one of the lower class engereers in freddys and after The Mimic failed to be a parent who mimicked edwin while he was at work, casuing his son to die Edwin became abusive towards the Mimic animatronic, resulting it it mimicing that, but edwin didn't know it so it ended up in a fazbear ent storage. Then years later when making the VR game some exec remembered the program, and wanted to save money by implementing its ai in the code so it can just mimic other code instead of paying programmers to code (ahead of its time i guess) but the ai now mimicing abusive behavior latched onto the crimes of William which were shown in the video game decided to commit identity fraud and cosplay as him. Long story short, its not william, its a rouge AI mimicking William but its more than William.
15:02 The reason that didn't work is that he forgot to do the thing you just mentioned, trap him. He kinda just expected him to sit there and burn I guess.
Hah, yes. Good old GregBot. A good chunk of theorist youtube hasnt caught up on it, but that one has been debunked pretty thoroughly by recent revelations (he had a family in modern times. Robots dont tend to.)
There is a bit more to remnant but it's way easier to explain with just being near metal still can't explain how a VR headset can infect people but whatever
misconception, the ONLY one who had the ability of give life was Henry, that why his creations can be possessed by spirits and Cassidy was portrayed back in FNAF 1 but we get hear her presence in UCM
tbh, at some point I just stopped caring about FNaF. Especially after SL. I came back to the franchise when HW was announced. Now I don't care again, mainly due to the movie.
