The CONTROVERSIAL Moments in All England 2024 

😂😂😂

棒球都能重播了，羽球還是蠢材決定輸贏。

Provide hindi subtitles ❤

Bing chilling

they should add a recording of the stand in the future and issue penalty if a problem does arise or else the problem will continue to happen. Delete the recording after the whole tournament if nothing occur. I don't get why a person (even if its a child) isn't escorted out after doing it more than once as if its some type of tiktok challenge =/ The ban can be enforced onto the parent too. Q did no one went to tell the parent that his/her son was using flashlight "intentionally" on the phone...??

BWF things lol

The flashlight is on a phone, no? You can't expect security to remove ALL phones with a light. They announced, " Please, no flashlights/camera flashes." many times. It's down to the public to be more careful, I don't think the venue could have done much more. If they do it again, then tell them to leave, but I don't think this happened?

@@curnowbascombe5400 reports seem to indicate this was a repeat offender What I'm saying is it's not a photography flash. The light remained ON, indicating it's the use of the flashlight feature, not merely taking a photo with a quick flash.

​@@curnowbascombe5400 o please... u dont even know we in pakistan the people are not allowed to bring their phones while watching live cricket matches. In this kind of situation, security should sumbit all phones and when one needs to make a call or receibe he must go to secueity room within the match times ans then get their phones back once the matches are over. Simple and can be managed by the venue administration😊

Ironic that it happens in Britain. Remember when Tom Daley was allowed to retake his botched dive during the 10m men diving final at the 2012 London Olympics because he complained of "flash distraction"? He ended up stealing the bronze!

Sure

absolutely

That person must be fined and banned from all bwf events .

BWF HALLO22 HALLU22 ...dont silent ..🤭💔😭

Marin was attacked several times by someone leaving the red light on during a rally, surely deliberate. The people who do this have very sick minds, sore losers.

Instead of blaming the umpires, There should be a var system for these kind of mistakes and players should be given permission to appeal on these.

@@ramjai2007 Por qué no los dos?

Flash light during such level of badminton is strictly prohibited. The organiser must be proactive to stop this. The players should not be penalised for the flash light that disturb the player's concentration.

​@@hyzanyusof6204penyelenggara allENGLAND tak PROFESIONAL...penonton bebas????😢

@@mualim4130 Benar.. Penyelangaraan ALL England semacam peringkat pertandingan sekolah sekolah. Bila pemain pemain seperti Tunjung and Lee Zi Jia sudah komplain, seharusnya ada tindakan segera. Dan penonton Piala Sudirman dan Malaysia open lebih tertib!

Maybe its coz if the betting that's influencing them

Don't worry, the police will look into this case 15 years later after they are done convicting the local town drunk for writing "inappropriate speech" on his Instagram and Facebook accounts.

@@11-ng6rwyeap but what my comment meant was that this years all england had too many bad calls from the umpires so much so that this channel could create a whole vid on it

And what it has to do with my guy comment up there?​@11-ng6rw

@@devileye90so you take a stand and let your audience cheat for you😅, lol , miserable losers

dont imagine, it happened

@11-ng6rw And what does someone's nationality had anything to do with their factual accuracy, or "rights" to speak/discuss about a topic?

Crazy hey. It wasn't even remotely obstructing the play.

He was not even close to net😢😂😂

Similar thing happened with Christie. I've never seen a volleyball block like that got disallowed.

Exactly, it was clearly a legal block. Ginting was fully able to play a legal stroke.

Umpire was 100% racist.

imagine we all see what should be the correct call for a netplay but still umpire call cant be changed, that's frustrating . Also challenge should not be instant because player should ask the partner player if they will challenge even Gill commented this to WD finals.

Agree, especially so many wrong judgement kill player's heart

No sport makes full use of technology because that would stop them from fixing matches and profit from the controversy (free advertisement) when things like this happens. Remember, it's a business first, sport second.

@@DanDan-li4hr Same thing was for cricket, but then they introduced DRS (Decision review system). I guess every sport needs that.

@@jesusojeda7850 This

1) Hawk-eyes use-fullness in this is questionable, but use of slow speed cameras at the net. 2) These could be good, but they have downsides. They would allow more time wasting as they could be used in situations that don’t really need it in order to get a break, break opponent flow etc. The BWF is working hard to speed games up and this would probably go against it. Also these are still rare and very rarely determine a match. Take into account the number of matches at the All England for example. 2) The rules could be made clearer but that doesn’t mean that umpire’s are unfair or incompetent. They have a split second to make a decision, most people couldn’t do the job. The rules allow for you to finish your swing on the other side of the court if the contact is on your own side, but obstructing this movement or making it harder is a fault. Although generally it shouldn’t be called in my opinion if the rackets don’t make contact. 3) Replaying the point isn’t always a good idea. There could be people in who are paid to disturb the match in favour of a player etc. Also evicting viewers can bring a lot of bad press on you. Should we then ban drums or shouting when smashing etc. since they could disturb some players even when used during breaks or maybe just ban viewers all together from the venue only having livestreams as an option. Having referees review events could also take significant amounts of time and isn’t in most cases realistic. Rules cannot be written too specific and will always require interpretation. Which gets more consistent over time and training which happens at all tournaments. At the beginning, during and end to some extent. The thing people really need to remember that umpires, players and the BWF all want to see the sport succeed and grow. But saying umpires should be fined or fired because they made a mistake is very harmful for the sport. Umpires are people too and make mistakes and in many cases learn from them. But in a match it isn’t possible to allow all decisions to be questioned, changed or otherwise reviewed because there needs to be some control (as unfair it sometimes seems) of the situations and there are time constraints. Matches can’t last for hours because of debate about rules, calls etc. That kind of attitude creates a versus atmosphere and makes progress or change very hard.

Bro wtf 😂 what is this?? A cartoon villain??? Did he also look at the camera grinning doing finger taps with both his hands 😂.

Yes😂​@@fauzanaziz6365

​@@fauzanaziz6365 😂😂 so funny

if it's just a fine, someone is probably willing to pay it just to make someone winning,banned and got escorted out of the stadium by the security would be the best action.

Why not both ​@@easygoing4964

@@easygoing4964 I would say it depends on how huge the fine is. I mean, would anyone really be willing to pay, say 100000 pounds to have a player win 1 match that isn't a finals match? Though, if they bet on it, then I can see a reason. If the person bet like 200000 pounds on the match I can see them having reason enough to do it, but can any "normal" working person really bet that large an amount of money on a single match that isn't even a finals match? Edit: Not to say I'm against banning and escorting people out of the venue. Imo, they should be banned for a season, escorted out and fined for hurting the players and venues. Especially if people are found to use a laser pointer, as they can actually make people go blind or reduce their eyesight.

What has happened before? It's just Indogs crying as usual

Nowhere near as many flashlights or bad umpire calls last year or the previous years I have attended since 2019. This year was very very bad.

all plyer better not join AE next time...england country so dumb

Really, Greg? The poor kids face is all over the internet.

​@@unexpectediteminbaggingare8074 Look at it this way, Badminton players spend most, if not all their time and money to Badminton. From training, nutrition, accommodation, equipment, etc. One big way to earn money is by winning tournaments, and even then it's not a lot. Being obstructed would cause you to lose thousands of dollars in prize money. Now how about, let's see, Basketball and Baseball games. I'm pretty sure plenty of faces appear on jumbotrons and online at 4K quality. This kid's basically the same. Arguably, even at worse quality. They're in public, with hundreds of cameras around.

Too many glaring errors. The quality of umpires leaves much to be desired especially in the All England Championships.

The fact that badminton tech is so behind it's funny

whats wrong with that

totally agree. So fucking anoying.

​@@west9383Everything! Deliberate attempt to cause disturbance & pretty much favouritism from Refree's! She doesn't return the shuttle property, shouts, delays, taunts etc....

They are Racist

Normal bro His not from asian 😂😂😂

BWF is too cheap to implement this technology. Hawkeye wasn't even implemented

no budget? @@YungAntoine

BWF tidak akan pernah memikirkannya

And sensor motion in the ball just like FIFA

Agreed. For Ginting (and I am a Ginting fan), it wasn't so much about the racket crossing the plane of the net, it was that Ginting's racket touched the net. That is a fault.

​Axelsen made Ginting swear he did not touch the net and you can see Ginting raise 2 fingers in a gesture to mean "he swears" he did not touch the net...lol.

She should point it out as well then

Problem is she lacks the self-assertion.

if you're being wronged then point it out, you were the one being quiet, don't make it out like you're better just because you "didn't let it affect" you

You don't stop a rally whenever it's convenient for you@@zirconia1205

Don't put your words in yamaguchi mouth , as if you are playing for yamaguchi

no

@@jimbojimbo6909my eyes are pretty good, that was a net touch of some degree for sure, the air from the racket wouldn’t cause the entire net to rattle like that my friend.. it was a net fault.

​I don't think it's a net fault, but it's definitely up for debate. I mean, if it was a net fault, shouldn't the net be shaking? If we consider it from the last point of view, the racket did touch the net, but it was such a light touch that it's hard to say for sure.

Shuttel cock certainly did not attack the field because it fell straight on the court victor, maybe it was the reason for the judge

@@johanryuzaki1963 Later in the video it's shown that Ginting has touched the net before hitting the shuttle.

Karma is when you get punishment for doing something wrong. Ginting didn't really do anything wrong, the umpires were just biased for him in this tournament

@@leob4403 I beg to differ. That net point off Christie's block was clearly his point, the chair umpire was probably dumb, but Ginting should have conceded that point to his compatriot as he clearly saw it wasn't his. Instead, he happily accepted it and played on while Christie was left stunned.

@@briangmoh5261 but christie won that match quite easily innit?

nope, it's just their poor judgement,even in the final between Indonesia vs Indonesia this kind of thing still happened.

It held in the UK though

Biased towards Ginting. Still happened in the final

Darimana anda tahu bahwa Akane Yamaguchi juga mendapatkan sorot laser dari tribun penonton

वीडियो है इंटरनेट पे,twitter पे देखा था,,,जब यमागुची खेल रही थी तब भी फ्लैश हो रहा था​@@davidadisaputra3101

It is, have u ever played badminton? You cant even see the damn shuttle with flashlight glaring at your eyes

Nice. Aiming for the shuttle and flashlights. Dumbass 😂

Just because Tunjung stopped it doesn't mean that it should be called a let. You can't assume that the umpire will be able to catch everything in the background. Play until the shuttlecock is dead and complain to the umpire in between points if you need to.

@@luf4rall You apparently did not understand anything I said (which is actually fairly common on the internet) -- I said 'the fair thing to do would have been to play a let' -- I'm interested in what is fair to the players, as long as it's well within the rules -- and playing a let in that situation fulfills both of those criteria -- understand now?

Agreed. In the All England, some umpires have spoilt the spirit of the games on fair play. Time to rectify.