Тёмный

The CRAZY plan to turn old soviet nuclear bombers into luxury private jets! - TU-160 Civil version 

Found And Explained
Подписаться 708 тыс.
Просмотров 329 тыс.
50% 1

Discord: / discord
Patreon: / foundandexplained
This modified Tupolev 160 concept, at the request of Putin himself, would have an entry into service as soon as 2027 and could very well change aviation in the world's largest country. However, likely it won't ever be built, and the future of supersonic travel is still very much up for grabs. This is why.
Turning a bomber aircraft into a passenger plane isn't a new idea, and many commercial planes owe their initial development to military contracts.
Thus when top officials visited the production facility of Russia's supersonic plane, the Tu-160 white swan, or you might know it as the NATO name Blackjack.
The Tupolev 160 began as a response to the US Air Force C-1. Russia needed a bomber aircraft that could fly supersonic Mach 2.3, with a variable-geometry swing. Various different designs were initally considered, but in the end in 1984, Russia selected the 160 as the winning design.
Flash forward to 2018, when the government signed a deal to produce ten new Tu-160M2s, and restore as many of the existing ones with new engines.
This passenger version would have the same airframe, although inside it would only have a crew of two, a pilot and co-pilot
Speaking of passengers, At 40ms of internal space, and a seat pitch of 90cm, or 35 inches, that would be 88 passengers - not bad! realistically up to 10 passengers would be expected
it would have a range of 12,300 km (6,600 nmi) and a top speed of Mach 2.05. This would mean that passengers could fly from Moscow to london in only an hour, with about 30 minutes to take off and land - ignoring sonic booms of course!
The plane had the space, and the program was short cash, so why not let commercial operators, and the many rich billionaires of Russia, buy the unfinished airframes and have their own mini private jets that could fly supersonic. The tech was there, the planes needed modernization, and there was a market.
"Big business tycoons in different countries (an Arab sheikh, a millionaire in Australia and a wealthy Greek among them) keep asking us to make a personal supersonic plane on the basis of the missile-carrying Tupolev-160 or long-range bomber Tupolev-2M3," said Tupolev Deputy CEO for Design and R&D, Valery Solozobov
And to understand why, we must go back to where it all began - with the Tu-144
The first supersonic aircraft to fly into the sky was the Tu-144. The Russian-built aircraft could fly faster than the Concorde, and carry more passengers - although reportedly you wouldn't want to fly onboard due to the lack of comfort nor the noise of the powerful engines.
Sixteen Tu-144s were built, but after one crashed during a delivery run the plane lost its golden goose reputation and was regulated for ad-hoc services. It was too expensive to operate and would be shelved practically a year later by the government exclusively for airforce use
"It was taken out of production because airline tickets must take into consideration average salaries in the country.”
"Today, the situation is different,” the president said to the engineers. “Big companies have appeared which could have used this aircraft.”
Why can't the Tu-160 be turned into a passenger plane.
The first is cost. Just because it has room onboard for 4-6 passengers, doesn't make it a cheap retrofit.
"Turning Tupolev-160 into a passenger plane would be a very costly affair," said a statement from Tupolev "It is far less expensive to build a plane anew and without the know-hows used in creating the Tupolev-160."
By having a private buyer, the plane could be flown to USA and sold to the CIA to take apart. An idea that obviously, Russia is keen to avoid.
"Most of the Tupolev-160 know-hows are secret, so building even a passenger configuration of this plane for private clients would be wrong," added the Tupolev spokesperson.
But just because the Tu-160 won't see passenger service, doesn't mean Russia is out of the game.
Back in Febrary, a partnership was announced between the UAE’s Mubadala and Russia’s United Aircraft Corporation (UAC) to develop a new supersonic transport plane. And they are moving fast, with a goal to present the specifications by the end of this year.
So far they are flirting with two different versions of a supersonic jet, one that can carry eight passengers, while the other could transport 30, at a speed of mach 1.8. It would have a range of four hours flight time, which at that speed would be around 8890 km or 4800 nautical miles.
One of the sticking points is that the engine used for the plane, the Nk-32 that is on the tu-160, isn't right. Its not the right size and its not compliant for commercial operators nor airports around the world.
Needless to say, there is clearly interest amoung the rich of the world for a plane that can get you there fast, and the UAC is looking to sell this plane to the middle east and southeast Asia.

Опубликовано:

 

15 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 569   
@gabrielb9010
@gabrielb9010 3 года назад
Dear passengers welcome on board Aeroflot flight 2222 to Toulouse If you notice a large compartment that's were the bomb was please don't press the red botton. Thank You!
@robertdragoff6909
@robertdragoff6909 3 года назад
LOL!
@b172ddm2
@b172ddm2 3 года назад
and in incase of emergency please wear your parachute proceed to the bombay thank you😂😂😂
@joechang8696
@joechang8696 3 года назад
Passengers: if you would like to file a complaint, proceed to the big compartment and press the red lever
@b172ddm2
@b172ddm2 3 года назад
@@joechang8696 😂😂😂
@capricorn839
@capricorn839 3 года назад
If you need to go to the toilet please press the red button. LOL
@thantzweaung9080
@thantzweaung9080 3 года назад
The proposed civil version of Tu-160 is most likely for a platform for satellite launches. Civil use but still under supervision of Russia's military. Media outlets just went crazy.
@shoora813
@shoora813 3 года назад
Very unlikely. MiG-31 is big enough to launch anti-satellite missiles, but Tu-160 is too small to launch more serious payload.
@thantzweaung9080
@thantzweaung9080 3 года назад
@@shoora813 If a Boeing 747 can launch a small satellite-carrying rocket from underwing pylon, a specialized variant of Tu-160 with no internal bomb bay, more fuel capacity & only 1 external centerline pylon can do similar task. & MiG-31 is smaller than Tu-160.
@rwboa22
@rwboa22 3 года назад
@@thantzweaung9080 yet the Virgin Orbital operations does have it genesis with the Pegasus rocket that was air-launched by the modified B-52 much like the X-15.
@GM-xk1nw
@GM-xk1nw 3 года назад
@@shoora813 he said satellite not anti satellite
@simonnamunyekwa3860
@simonnamunyekwa3860 3 года назад
@@shoora813 6
@modelllichtsysteme
@modelllichtsysteme 3 года назад
Flying the "Blackjack" Casino and playing Blackjack would very interesting.
@PhoenixSky7
@PhoenixSky7 3 года назад
Supersonic casino? Gotta play fast too
@Joshua_N-A
@Joshua_N-A 3 года назад
You forgot with hookers onboard.
@Joshua_N-A
@Joshua_N-A 3 года назад
@@PhoenixSky7 who has the most chips before touchdown wins. You only got less than 2 hours.
@shoora813
@shoora813 3 года назад
Very noisy casino
@capricorn839
@capricorn839 3 года назад
It will crash
@พิตตินันท์จันทร์ศรี-ว5ฟ
1:04 “Converting Military aircraft to Civil aircraft isn’t a new thing at all.” Yeah,for Tupolev.This is a return to the old days when they started developing airliners.Because the first two airliners created by Tupolev are civilian versions of strategic bombers-The Tu-104 and Tu-114,both were developed from Tu-16 & Tu-95!
@Andre_Thomasson
@Andre_Thomasson 10 месяцев назад
all because he got "plane shamed" lol
@jonash6070
@jonash6070 3 года назад
Welcome aboard the supersonic airliner/former bomber, where you get to your destination quicker and can also drop you off an route. Parachute optional.
@alexeyvlasenko6622
@alexeyvlasenko6622 3 года назад
You can ride the bomb down, like Major Kong
@notyouraveragemechanic7376
@notyouraveragemechanic7376 2 года назад
Seeing that SU-32 flying next to the TU-160 was amazing. I’m an American but I love Soviet aircraft.
@vgames1543
@vgames1543 3 года назад
The TU-160 truly is gorgeous.
@capricorn839
@capricorn839 3 года назад
Gorgeous flying coffins
@woodonfire7406
@woodonfire7406 3 года назад
@@capricorn839 technically, no TU-160 has ever been shot down
@ItsRawdraft2
@ItsRawdraft2 2 года назад
@@capricorn839 American spotted
@TheMechas56
@TheMechas56 2 года назад
@@capricorn839 Hi 👋🏼 this bomber supersonic jet✈️ has never been in any accident or it has been shot down, and the only one jet piloted by a civilian (president Putin), hahaha 🤣 hahaha 😝 hahaha 🤪 Cheers Romualdo 🍻🍻
@Tounguepunchfartbox
@Tounguepunchfartbox Год назад
Bro it doesn’t even look that good. Especially in real life, they look dirty and poorly put together.
@whattttt91
@whattttt91 3 года назад
I can't imagine because this channel is so underrated Keep up the good job!
@riliryrimaddyvia9630
@riliryrimaddyvia9630 3 года назад
Imagine an alternate universe where the concorde was never retired and supersonic boom doesn't exist
@robertdragoff6909
@robertdragoff6909 3 года назад
it won't be the Concorde, but they're working on silencing the sonic booms with a new plane.
@DinoNucci
@DinoNucci 3 года назад
That's where I met your mom
@NathanPa-xo3zj
@NathanPa-xo3zj 3 года назад
Thats was The Man In The High Castle universe where Nazi and France with Britania "co-operate" to launch the Concord
@bigdopamine9343
@bigdopamine9343 3 года назад
If sonic booms didn’t exist then physics would be completely different and humans probably couldn’t exist.
@robertdragoff6909
@robertdragoff6909 3 года назад
@@bigdopamine9343 good point
@karbengo
@karbengo 3 года назад
Now I can't help but imagine what the same treatemnt applied to a US B1 Lancer would look like. It would be gorgeous!
@aquiveal
@aquiveal 3 года назад
I would love to buy that. Pockets are empty though.
@gradowik
@gradowik 3 года назад
i guess that would open Pandora's box: why not A12/SR71 and soon we'll end up with space shuttles as private jets.
@deeya
@deeya 3 года назад
@@gradowik wouldn't work as well. Even in a military capacity, the SR71 was a very inefficient aircraft. It leaked fuel as it sat on the tarmac, because the engineers were compensating for thermal expansion of the titanium during flight.
@gradowik
@gradowik 3 года назад
@@deeya i guess this leaks would be the smallest problem among any other "attractions" of owning and keeping airworthy surplus military jet. There are many reasons why airlines opt for slow huge flying buses with high bypass engines and civilian market is a mix of flying on things fragile like in 1914 and plastic versions of WWII technology - designs that are tested to the limits also in terms of maintenance. Anyway idea of concorde size of a learjet or something suspended between too overpowered engines is still very romantic and many romantics or too rich dream about it. As far as i know there was more reasonable attempt called paris jet. First thing was changing engines to high bypas version. Edit: SR-71 has one strong point in this romantic idea of supersonic bussines jet: service altitude high enough to mitigate effects of sonic boom while cruising. That's why i put together space shuttle and SR-71 - only extreme altitude seems to be way for supersonic cruise in a peace time.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 3 года назад
@@deeya it also used special fuel with a high boiling temperature, JP7, because normal fuel would have gotten too hot during flight
@Joshua_N-A
@Joshua_N-A 3 года назад
Imagine the maintenance cost. The wings have moving parts and more moving parts means more maintenance hours.
@zachboyd4749
@zachboyd4749 3 года назад
Yeah, complexity and maintenance costs are what killed the Tomcat!
@ressljs
@ressljs 3 года назад
Even for someone with infinite wealth, supersonic bombers also have terrible readiness. That is, you spend all that money on your supersonic private plane, only to taxi out to the runway, then half the time turn around and taxi back to park because something broke or caution lights went off before you could even take off.
@rgj5832
@rgj5832 3 года назад
I agree I mean even for a billionaire this aircraft would incredible to purchase and then operate. It would certainly make you cooler than all your other billionaire friends but I think to operate one would be unrealistic. Although I would love to see one!
@thatguyalex2835
@thatguyalex2835 2 года назад
Imagine in the future, this aircraft could use E-fuels, and this could be an energy efficient supersonic airliner. Add an AI autopilot, and you can save money on hiring pilots (assuming in 2027-2030, pilots could be replaced with high performance computers and sensors).
@pepsi6825
@pepsi6825 Год назад
Just change back to normal wings
@37A-s6h
@37A-s6h 3 года назад
*Plot Twist: All the passengers in the plane become bombs and bomb bay doors start opening*
@ariesleo7396
@ariesleo7396 3 года назад
Now imagine if they just converted back into a bomber and it was disguised as a passenger plane outside....(I think that will break some international laws but hey that is a idea)
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
Check out my bomber 747 video. It’s exactly that from a 747-100
@viktorcsanyi726
@viktorcsanyi726 2 года назад
Quite expensive form of misleading some 10 year old childrens about its real purpose...
@Henning_Rech
@Henning_Rech Год назад
@@viktorcsanyi726 The Soviet Union did the same with trains which could launch nuclear ICBMs but looked like civil trains
@StudeSteve62
@StudeSteve62 3 года назад
Fascinating...since it's an old idea revived. After World War II, for a couple decades, high performance bombers of the day such as the Douglas A-26 were turned into executive transports by outfits like On Mark. Even the pioneering Lear "business jet" started out as a combat type, Switzerland's FFA P16...
@SceurdiaStudios
@SceurdiaStudios 3 года назад
Environmentalist: noo, you can't fly planes, they're bad Russia: haha sonic boom go brrr
@Vespuchian
@Vespuchian 3 года назад
0:58 - Nice of you to mention the 747's (partial) origins in the USAF's CX-HLS contest that was ultimately won by Lockheed's Galaxy (despite the Air Force liking Boeing's better). I don't know if there's interest, but a video about Boeing's CX-HLS entry, why it failed to be adopted, and its relation to the 747 would be an interesting topic for a future video.
@jeffreyzheng8875
@jeffreyzheng8875 3 года назад
Fun fact: Boeing 747-8f ended up with a higher payload than the C-5
@robertdragoff6909
@robertdragoff6909 3 года назад
Back in the days before WWII, Germany side stepped the treaty of Versailles by building 'air liners' that were actually bomber designs (i,e, Heinkel H111) so while this is a reverse scenario it's kinda the same.
@commerce-usa
@commerce-usa 3 года назад
Sure, but it still holds the time record for offloading passenger baggage. 🤣
@ultramanJR
@ultramanJR 3 года назад
@@commerce-usa Why bother dropping the baggage when we can just fly the passengers directly to their destination then strap them and their baggage to a parachute and just drop them? Would that be faster?
@ressljs
@ressljs 3 года назад
One extra complication is modern bombers are designed under a "skies the limit" attitude towards budgets, so it's almost impossible to turn them into commercial planes that can be operated in any kind of financially realistic manner.
@minliu9999
@minliu9999 3 года назад
Something you forgot: Supersonic planes are banned everywhere so there is no point of building an economic supersonic jet
@chrissmith7669
@chrissmith7669 2 года назад
All the manufacturers are working together to have the rules amended to say they cannot exceed the currently allowed noise levels for commercial aircraft.
@fluseint.1303
@fluseint.1303 3 года назад
I can't help me but this plane and his American brother B1 are looking so nice👌
@AO-ow6tt
@AO-ow6tt 3 года назад
The Tu-160 White Swan with its low and hi speed performance characteristics is the pefect platform to develop a passenger supersonic airliner. As for Russia concerns that the CIA would have access to its top secret construction techniques, it is well known that a number of Tu-160 based in Ukraine were already examined by the US which provided equipment to wreck them under the treaty of arms reduction. The remaining number was bought back and returned to Russia by the end of the 90s.
@atilllathehun1212
@atilllathehun1212 3 года назад
I love the Blackjack as a bomber but those dirty smoky engines of Tu160 would never be allowed at a civil airport.
@groupcaptainbonzo
@groupcaptainbonzo 3 года назад
I’m assuming that, if true, it would primarily be an “Airforce oneski” for Putin to gad about in .
@LeventDV
@LeventDV 3 года назад
pilot: *drops passangers one by one* owps old habit
@christianlords1340
@christianlords1340 3 года назад
funny, but they barely made a shot in anger.
@draganprso8678
@draganprso8678 3 года назад
Drop your misery brain
@rossblandford7558
@rossblandford7558 3 года назад
The tu144 may have been 1st but it looked strangely similar to concorde, couldn't supercruise and crashed at Paris air show. Ultimately supersonic jet's need to mitigate the sonic boom to be practical though I think.
@ГеоргийМурзич
@ГеоргийМурзич 3 года назад
" and crashed at Paris air show" Concorde also crashed near Paris
@rossblandford7558
@rossblandford7558 3 года назад
@@ГеоргийМурзич yes, I suppose there is an irony in that! Although the concorde crash was 30 years later, and I think only due to a tyre. Maybe when they do mitigate the noise problem with supersonic jet's and make a new version they should not show it any where near Paris! 😀
@hanzzel6086
@hanzzel6086 2 года назад
@@rossblandford7558 The Concorde crashed twice. I cannot recal the cause of the first crash (I think it was human error or maintenance issues (or maybe both)), the second crash was because a piece of an improperly maintained (iirc) DC-10 fell onto the runway. That caused the Concordes tire to burst when it hit it at near take off speed and pieces of said tire then impacted the exterior wing surface directly under the wing fuel tanks, causing a major fuel leak. This resulted in engine failure at a crucial moment just after take off (it was too late to abort the take off when they hit the debris) thus causing the Concorde to crash.
@moshoodbakare1210
@moshoodbakare1210 2 года назад
It's the Concorde that looks like te Tu-144.
@hanzzel6086
@hanzzel6086 2 года назад
@@moshoodbakare1210 Uh, no. The Tu-144 was only built so fast because they used stolen late stage Concorde techincal blueprints and rushed the final stages of design/construction. Before the design theft the USSR was years behind the West in this area.
@Billhatestheinternet
@Billhatestheinternet 3 года назад
I would have figured the fuel costs and sonic boom first. The same thing that dooms all SST. The third and one most don't think of is: Patrol jets pick up or sight a TU-160. They do not realize it is CIVILIAN, they only see a BOMBER. Shoot down potential.
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
That’s a great point!
@Th3_Gael
@Th3_Gael 3 года назад
Excellent video. The blackjack moniker always bothered me with this plane. White Swan is so much more fitting
@StudeSteve62
@StudeSteve62 3 года назад
Well, yes, if that weren't also a brand of toilet paper...🙄
@Dumbrarere
@Dumbrarere 3 года назад
Another big reason I see a civil Tu-160 never being a thing is because its radar cross section is way too similar to that of the military version, and because it would be flying as a single jet, it would potentially fool military radar installations into thinking that there was a nuclear strike on the way. As you might expect, it would likely result in an international incident akin to that of the KAL Flight 007 incident, where Soviet interceptors shot down a Korean airliner in 1983 after mistaking it for a spy plane, when it veered off course.
@kek207
@kek207 3 года назад
There are sadly many errors in this Video. As an example: 4:48 Its obviously the Tu22m3 and not tu2m3 or the fact to say that it has a range of 12300km which is true but not mentioning it could fly significantly less while supersonic rendering the whole idea useless for atlantic crossing for example. You would need at least one fuel stop alone to cross Russia
@StudeSteve62
@StudeSteve62 3 года назад
Very cool shots of the Tu144 on the highway. There are shots just like that of the Valkyrie bomber prototype being towed down the road near Wright Patterson AFB for display at the USAF Museum circa 1971...
@commerce-usa
@commerce-usa 3 года назад
Turns out the DC-8 was the first commerical jet to go supersonic. It wasn't pretty getting it there, but it made it nevertheless.
@StudeSteve62
@StudeSteve62 3 года назад
It did, yes, but that wasn't part of its operational envelope...
@commerce-usa
@commerce-usa 3 года назад
@@StudeSteve62 absolutely, though nobody sent that memo to the marketing department. 🙂
@rajkamalpresentations8543
@rajkamalpresentations8543 3 года назад
they have done this with the Tu-95 bear bomber converted it for presidental uses and tried the same concept with the MIG-25 FOXBAT too
@quisqueyanguy120
@quisqueyanguy120 3 года назад
Noo, the Tu-95 engines are way too loud.
@rajkamalpresentations8543
@rajkamalpresentations8543 3 года назад
@@quisqueyanguy120 that's the reason the converted version didn't last long due to noise issues
@JeremiahDouglas
@JeremiahDouglas 3 года назад
I wonder which one is louder hopefully it will be an improvement.
@atilllathehun1212
@atilllathehun1212 3 года назад
@@quisqueyanguy120 Two Tu95s were converted for VIP use, designated Tu116. Had pax cabins and ventral air stairs.
@MLOO123
@MLOO123 3 года назад
The bear bomber another beauty... Plus the Mi-24 Hind gunship helicopter... Russian design No.1!!!
@tupolev.designs
@tupolev.designs 2 года назад
They should still keep some of the bombers, who knows you might need it in case one invades, humanity is unpredictable
@tupolev.designs
@tupolev.designs 2 года назад
This didn’t age well
@cte4dota
@cte4dota 3 года назад
Fascinate how regular aircraft MC21 is struggle to be complete for Russian aero industry, meanwhile they have much more complex technology of TU-160 composite body capable withstand high speeds and engines made for super sonic speeds.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 3 года назад
To be successful in the airliner market you have to have a competitive aircraft in terms of cost, and service around the globe. Airbus and Boeing are capable of support and service world wide, other smaller manufacturers not.
@cranklabexplosion-labcentr8245
@cranklabexplosion-labcentr8245 3 года назад
I just found this channel... And, thanks for explaining.
@dnate697
@dnate697 3 года назад
Great freaking Idea! Something I talked about when the first SU-34 came out! Imagine it as a stretched Falcon Jet replacement? Give it more efficient engines and a longer Mach 1.5 to 1.8 speed, and it would sell like hotcakes at IHOP LOL!
@TheNicestPig
@TheNicestPig 2 года назад
Can't see supermanueverability and 9+ G Tolerance being too useful in a Civilian setting, could probably scrap the TVC and structural reinforcements along with all the fire control, military-rated radar and ECM to pump out more range and speed.
@dnate697
@dnate697 2 года назад
@@TheNicestPig MATV would be used for Take-Offs and Landings. Delta Wings are less efficient at take-offs and landings. Delta wings shine at higher speeds.
@yolomcswaggens9482
@yolomcswaggens9482 3 года назад
Putin never "ordered" this. He only proposed this in a video, saying that supersonic passenger planes would be beneficial because of the size of the country.
@TigerChamp99
@TigerChamp99 3 года назад
Please consider making a video about Boeing 707, Douglas DC-8 or Sud Aviation Caravelle (1st gen Jet airliners)
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
They have been convered pretty extensively. but perhaps you would like a really long and detailed video about them?
@zainolbachok5018
@zainolbachok5018 3 года назад
Baby
@10gamer64
@10gamer64 3 года назад
Don't forget the Comet or the TU 104
@rodrigonogueiramota4433
@rodrigonogueiramota4433 3 года назад
Russia: maybe we should convert a TU160 into a luxurious private jet, but it will be expensive Mazepin´s dad: I want 2 of them. one for me and one for my son, it´s still a lot cheaper than the car he crashes on every F1 GP
@jaykingsun7093
@jaykingsun7093 3 года назад
That's actually a brilliant idea!
@Sanginius23
@Sanginius23 3 года назад
They talked about 'civilian use' for the TU-160 but it is waaaaay more likely the use this bird to launch payload into the lower orbit
@skyejamss
@skyejamss 3 года назад
I can't wait till they redesign it!
@Player-257
@Player-257 3 года назад
Gosh, how I love the Russians. Their war machines looks so badass!
@aladik2010
@aladik2010 3 года назад
The whole PArasha & everything in it- is shitty attempt to copy USA.
@riot2136
@riot2136 3 года назад
aladik2010 even if that was true, doesn’t change the thought that they look cool
@alexeyvlasenko6622
@alexeyvlasenko6622 3 года назад
@@aladik2010 Bullshit, Tu-160 outperforms B-1 in every way, and all its systems are completely different. It's much larger, faster, and uses long-range cruise or ballistic missiles from a large distance rather than flying directly over the target and dropping bombs. The reason the planes look superficially similar is because they perform similar roles and the laws of aerodynamics are the same for both. A whale looks like a fish, but this doesn't mean that the whale is copying the fish. By your logic, American ICBMs are a shitty attempt to copy Soviet ones.
@TheMechas56
@TheMechas56 2 года назад
@@aladik2010 Wow 😮 what a shitty comment, US and Russia 🇷🇺 nuclear capable bombers are so different, Russian nuclear bombers don't need to fly outside Russia 🇷🇺, to deliver their nuclear weapons. Cheers malaka 🍻🍻
@duanemcdaniel9642
@duanemcdaniel9642 3 года назад
That is a brilliant idea! Really this is brilliant!
@TheRedAmogus
@TheRedAmogus Год назад
The Tu 144 wasn’t the first supersonic jet. It was the first supersonic passenger jet.
@jamesjackman4638
@jamesjackman4638 3 года назад
I really hope this gets built because it would give a run for money on boom supersonic and the others. I would not mind flying on it myself if it was made and I somehow won the lottery.
@anthonyhunt701
@anthonyhunt701 2 года назад
Like actually crashing at the 1973 Paris Air Show on live television….
@DevWo3
@DevWo3 2 года назад
Imagine seeing a passenger Tu-160 open its bomb bay doors lol, that would be an airport's nightmare
@CodyDoesIt
@CodyDoesIt 2 года назад
The Concord was wild how many rode in in it
@amateurwizard
@amateurwizard 3 года назад
It simultaneously earned the names White swan and blackjack 😎 I love this airframe
@theworstflash
@theworstflash 3 года назад
I think much like the modified TU-95 ( TU-114 ) you would need to build a whole new fuselage. I think you got something there. As it was though, I mean, just converting the front quick and dirty, just ain't an efficient way of going about it.
@johnmcelwain5884
@johnmcelwain5884 3 года назад
So, could the U.S. Navy SEALS pick up a used Concorde?
@alexandertheissl808
@alexandertheissl808 3 года назад
Expensive as Hell... Alone the fuel fuel costs 😲😲😲 .. Mind Bobling 😬
@stephenmaginn7247
@stephenmaginn7247 3 года назад
Aviation is getting so advanced its only a mater of time
@smiskowiak
@smiskowiak 10 месяцев назад
American, Soviet, or other nations still need to overcome one big problem before supersonic planes can become mainstream for civilians. That's the sonic boom. Military aircraft only go supersonic over civilian areas if absolutely necessary. Concorde was even restricted to sub-sonic speeds when near cities. Once that issue is figured out, then supersonic flight will be a regular thing.
@MisteriosGloriosos922
@MisteriosGloriosos922 2 года назад
*Thanks for beautiful work, liked & subcribed!!*
@jonathanagulhas646
@jonathanagulhas646 3 года назад
What's so crazy! About it'Its a brilliant idea👍💯
@pbxn-3rdx-85percent
@pbxn-3rdx-85percent 3 года назад
If a passenger is in a real hurry they could put him inside a modified KH-22 'kitchen' air to surface missile slung underneath the Blackjack. Survival is not guaranteed. : )
@swisstestpilot
@swisstestpilot 3 года назад
I think it is very unrealistic to get 80 people inside a civilian version of the Tu-160. You have to look how wide the bomb-bay is. In fact you can only use the space behind the pilots, avionics/crew rest compartment and the first bomb-bay. Because of the wing center structure/torsion box it is not possible to get to the back bomb-bay. So the back bombbay might can be used for the cargo only. Because of the shape of the Tu-160 fuselage, only the first 1-3 rows would have windows...The shape of the fuselage raises also a problem for (in civilian Pax travel mandatory) emergency exits.
@willfrankunsubscribed
@willfrankunsubscribed 8 месяцев назад
Rewatching this had me wondering... What if we went in reverse? What if we, in the hypothetical, had taken the Concorde design, and turn it into a supersonic bomber?
@magalenin
@magalenin 3 года назад
The real problem is that the Tu-160 is not curising supersonic for the whole flight. Its normal cruise speed is just Mach 0.9. So the map, which states implicitly that it has a very long range at Mach 2 or above, is false. So why did anyone buy a mainly subsonic plane but with the price tag of a supersonic, military-grade plane? And no, it is not possible to cost-effectively solve to fly this plane all along its route supersonic.
@chandrachurniyogi8394
@chandrachurniyogi8394 3 года назад
firstly the front nose of the Tu-160 Black Jack will have to be replaced with a more conventional arrow head type nose section, especially to accommodate the multi-purpose radar!!! the entire internal bomb bay of the Tu-160 will have to be discarded & the inner fuselage extensively modified to accommodate paxs meaning the interior volume of the Tu-160 has to be increased significantly!!! as a civil aircraft the modified cabin interior of the Tu-160 will only be able to accommodate 13 - 15 paxs plus 2 flight crew & 1-2 cabin crew!!! therefore the Tu-160 will best serve as a supersonic business jet with transcontinental range!!! the Tu-160 will also need additional fuel tanks to fly 35% - 40% further than usual!!! then there's the issue of the cargo hold that'll carry all the luggage!!! the Tu-160 will need a full glass cockpit, upgraded avionics & the newest fly-by-wire tech!!!
@FoundAndExplained
@FoundAndExplained 3 года назад
a total overhaul. perhaps they just can't do it, rather than not wanting to!
@lokesh303101
@lokesh303101 10 месяцев назад
Tupolev 144 is the best with devoid of Canards and a sleek cone at the front of fuselage.
@tobysatriayudha4564
@tobysatriayudha4564 2 года назад
Replace the old system with modern avionics and nav systems, replace the old engines with newer, less powerful yet much more efficient engine, and boom! All countries should just do this thing.
@eagle1de227
@eagle1de227 3 года назад
Two words are enough to describe the future of this marvelous project: FORGET IT !
@oxcart4172
@oxcart4172 3 года назад
MINI private jets? It's the biggest warplane in the world!
@rattyratstuff7125
@rattyratstuff7125 3 года назад
with the ability to launch missiles at business rifles.... nice
@shamanbhattacharyya9285
@shamanbhattacharyya9285 2 года назад
At least the tu-114 got converted
@diamondcrewmate3113
@diamondcrewmate3113 3 года назад
@Found And Explained I'm pretty sure you showed me the TU-160 model on discord, I love it!
@konoko1002k
@konoko1002k 3 года назад
*Drop bombs Pilot: I wander what does this button do... Co-pilot: Nooooooooooooooo
@kristensorensen2219
@kristensorensen2219 3 года назад
Fact is the Concorde was refitted after the crash of one and was fully usable. Any super rich should have bought them. I believe they went into museums to ensure no terrorists ever could get their hands on one. With a nuke on board and a suicide crew it would have been a real handful for any military to take down.
@mann2520
@mann2520 3 года назад
Never stop dreaming Russia never stop Russia
@felixmoresi1656
@felixmoresi1656 3 года назад
that one annoying passenger getting frozen out by depressurization
@nightwaves3203
@nightwaves3203 3 года назад
Excellent plane for passengers. Should sell well. I'm sure in one leg of a flight many megatons of passengers could be delivered.
@LIECR
@LIECR 2 года назад
The *bombs not included was hilarious
@mattpetty1
@mattpetty1 Год назад
Just think....It could drop off passengers without ever having to land. Parachutes will be an upgrade and cost extra.
@GoldenArrow297
@GoldenArrow297 3 года назад
Majestic flying machine ✈️
@Andre_Thomasson
@Andre_Thomasson 10 месяцев назад
well to be honest, If i were some millionaire I would definetely choose that over any other jet because of its history and mechanics
@relaxationstation7374
@relaxationstation7374 3 года назад
😍Daring, I totally love it!😍
@WolfeSaber9933
@WolfeSaber9933 3 года назад
What about turning a supersonic bomber, like the B-1B, into a space plane, or at less a proof of concept of a space plane. Mainly moving cargo into space.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 3 года назад
This would not work. The Bone can't even fly Mach 2. It would need a massive amount of fuel, extra oxygen and other engines for a flight outside the atmosphere. Also it would have to be way faster, for an orbit you need 27.000 km/h (around mach 25), the bone is not even capable of mach 2. Also it has no heat shield for reentry from mach 25. Space planes launched by rockets like the Shuttle have one big disadvantage, they have a lot of dead weight (wings etc) which has to be brought into orbit, but which is useless in space and decreases the payload. The shuttle for example was as heavy as the Saturn 5, but it could not leave earth orbit because it was too heavy, while the Apollo spacecraft on top of the Saturn 5 could reach deep space.
@WolfeSaber9933
@WolfeSaber9933 3 года назад
@@simonm1447 Modifications can give the BONE the ability to fly into space.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 3 года назад
@@WolfeSaber9933 but with all the modifications you need you have essentially a completely new aircraft. Its also a difference if you use a space plane like the one of Virgin Galactic to a short trip above the Karman line, or to put objects in an orbit. There's no space plane in history (the shuttle launched with a rocket) which ever orbited the eart, not even the much faster X-15.
@WolfeSaber9933
@WolfeSaber9933 3 года назад
@@simonm1447 The Air Force is thinking of retiring the B-1B for the B-21. Boeing wants to convert these bombers into super sonic gunships. This is all near future.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 3 года назад
@@WolfeSaber9933 that's right, but this concept has nothing to do with a space plane. A supersonic gunship don't fly into space, but shoots the enemy into hell
@Desire123ification
@Desire123ification 3 года назад
Brilliant idea! Could happen...
@aftonline
@aftonline 3 года назад
Mini private jet? I can think of quite a few smaller private jets than this thing.
@tomasgilvonauskas2166
@tomasgilvonauskas2166 3 года назад
Sorry, if we are talking about the same plane, then Found and Explained reporter did not mention one more reason why TU-160 can't be converted into private business jet. That's the iron wall, dividing payload storage compartment into two parts. I watched one Russian video one year ago, and Russians said "that was nice idea to convert supersonic bomber into supersonic business jet, but we can't remove that iron wall in storage compartment because of structural integrity".
@jamesevans938
@jamesevans938 3 года назад
or they could use have for passengers and half for bomb fantastic way to save fuel killing to birds with one stone
@mtmadigan82
@mtmadigan82 3 года назад
You couldnt pay me enough to step foot on any former soviet military aircraft. Theres a VAST difference between acceptable and safe with military aircraft vs civilian.
@vladsnape6408
@vladsnape6408 Год назад
It would be super-cool to be a passenger in a TU-160. Sign me up. However, if is unpressurised, surely it would not be able to fly a normal cruising altitude, suitable for supersonic flight, and therefore would not be able to achieve Mach > 1 for extended periods of time.
@onfin3al6
@onfin3al6 3 года назад
A nuke bomber goes commercial . Makes a few good flights to Miami , New York , DFW then on the 5th or 6th no passengers except in the bomb bay and good by city .
@lawrencefox563
@lawrencefox563 3 года назад
I liked that old badger ,a illushin passenger plane looked similar 2 engines nested in wing root like comet.
@MrNeptunebob
@MrNeptunebob 3 года назад
As for the "secrets" of the plane's construction, what could the Russians know and do that we have not figured out before? I think when we tried to get that Russian submarine in the 70s it was probably a disappointment.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 3 года назад
Russia never made technically outstanding aircraft. They also fly, but they are not something special. They have a good know how in rocket and missile technology, but not in aircraft technology.
@mirthenary
@mirthenary 2 года назад
And if the passengers get unruly, bombs away!
@DungHuynh-th6sx
@DungHuynh-th6sx 3 года назад
I proposed to buy one of those TU-160 without da NUKES but PUTIN said “ buy one get an other for free.. not the plane but DA NUKE “ 😂
@matsv201
@matsv201 3 года назад
The fuselage outer diameter.. or rather width (its slitly eliptical) is about 2.5 meters. That is slightly less than the E-jet family, a bit more than Saab 340. So 3 seats should fit.
@bobese5099
@bobese5099 3 года назад
The TU 160 white swan is not an old bomber, she only entered service sometimes in the 2000s.
@haditjandradjaja8403
@haditjandradjaja8403 3 года назад
Wait till the SR71 becomes the private hypersonic jet too.
@bryanrussell6679
@bryanrussell6679 2 года назад
I still think it's hilarious that the western world named their first one Concordski.
@MLOO123
@MLOO123 3 года назад
Please make it happened... It will be the most beautiful plane had ever built
@capricorn839
@capricorn839 3 года назад
I would say it's the most beautiful "flying coffins ever built
@MLOO123
@MLOO123 3 года назад
@@capricorn839 you just being sour and jealous... We can understand. Lmao 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@Ljet600
@Ljet600 3 года назад
before you create video such this, look in FAA and EASA requirements. Tu-160 will never received civil aviation authorities Type Certificate, because this aircraft doesn't meet FAA and EASA requirements.
@blackforest1484
@blackforest1484 3 года назад
Why russia should converted tu-160 to civil aircraft? Economically Nonsense
@Skyhawk996
@Skyhawk996 3 года назад
It's to expensive to fly at supersonic. You need an afterburner to hit that speed... hungry engines. This did kill the Concord also. Sounds good in concept not sure if it's practical. Unless we figure out how to make the engines more efficient.
@simonm1447
@simonm1447 3 года назад
The Concorde could fly at mach 2 without the afterburner, it only used it for take off and for acceleration to mach 2. With a fuel thirsty afterburner during cruise speed it would never have had the range to cross the Atlantic. The TU 144 could not fly supersonic without the afterburner. However the drag is still high at mach 2, and the Concorde took 4 times the fuel compared to a normal airliner.
@Skyhawk996
@Skyhawk996 3 года назад
@@simonm1447I knew that. It probably flew with the jet stream. So that speed can be maintained. Even drop tanks on something like a fighter can only use afterburner 30-45 minutes.
@walsakaluk1584
@walsakaluk1584 3 года назад
Can't wait. This is a nice option for long haul trips. Price?
@StudeSteve62
@StudeSteve62 3 года назад
Tu144 was the first supersonic PASSENGER jet to fly. It was scarcely the first supersonic jet...
@adragol_cabaret
@adragol_cabaret 2 года назад
"*Bombs not included".. Yeah, I would hope so.
@funghazi
@funghazi 3 года назад
The Tu-160 looks like an uncanny valley B-1B.
Далее
The Secret Race To Build A Nuclear Powered Plane
13:47
Просмотров 262 тыс.
Is this the best Soviet fighter jet ever made?
16:16
Просмотров 106 тыс.
MiG-31: Intercepting the SR-71
17:53
Просмотров 3,3 млн
Star Raker! - The Giant Insane Mach 7.2 Space Plane
20:48
WHAT ON EARTH is Going on with the Boeing 777X?!
23:40
Просмотров 558 тыс.
1950s INSANE VTOL Jet Fighter - Lockheed CL-346
15:18
How Russian Nuclear Bomber Works? Tu 160 Tu 22 Tu 95
10:21
Russia's Best Fighter Jet Ever Made - The Mig 21
10:29
Просмотров 973 тыс.