The cyclist catching motorists behaving badly | Times Reports 

You have.

@@glenearl9506 and I’m sure you are a Lycra wearing bum bandit friend of his

There's another guy like him . And he got twated.

He ignores pedestrians too, it's as if his only concern is making the roads safer 😮

@Dibley8899 How will he make the roads safer? By concentrating on motorists and ignoring his biker pals for committing the same offences.

​​​@Dibley8899He won't confront cyclists because if they give him a good hiding, he knows they will probably get away with it. Car drivers cannot because of the fact they are easily traceable by thier registration plates. So he can hide behind that safety net. Personally I dislike snitches. He really hates drivers. Probably can't afford a car, as he can't be in a full time job, given the amount of time he spends doing this.

On the one hand, he's not the police, so he's not obliged to be impartial. On the other, 99.99% of road deaths are caused by motor vehicles, so why would he waste his time focusing on the 0.01% that aren't?

@jonahwhale9047that is absolute horseshit, there is no way using a phone when your stuck in traffic is anywhere near as dangerous as drink driving. Send me a link to the evidence.

​@jonahwhale9047 Can you point me to this? I'm all in favour of the current mobile laws. However...all the studies I've seen about mobile phone distraction seem to be from the perspective of a moving vehicle, not a stationary one. Of course using a phone at the wheel is a distraction. I just think it would be interesting to see full data on it.

About time you understood. ru-vid.comjgacSmLBSIQ

@jonahwhale9047the people CM catches are predominantly in stationary traffic and they don't kill or maim people either

@jonahwhale9047 how many are caused by stationary drivers.

@jonahwhale9047 I don't know maybe 20% maybe 5% but wouldn't your time be better spent catching those people who are actually driving rather than targeting those in stationary traffic for click bait so you can monetize it

Still drivers are the ones killing 250 times more pedestrians than cyclists. We humans might have the feeling/thought that X is a bigger threat to us than Y but sometimes this feeling can be misleading. This is why it's important to do some research of some hard data to make it clear what are the major threats to our lifes and what are the minor threats.

Not enough money to pay them unfortunately. So they rely on cyclists wearing cameras to do it for them for free.

@Dibley8899 "But he breaks the law himself sometimes" does he?

A team of, say, five people doing that role would cost hundreds of thousands of pounds a year. I'm not saying it's not a worthwhile job, but there are more high priority crimes that they will be channelling their limited resources into.

@Dibley8899 No, it’s not.

@Dibley8899 assuming you don’t have a uk drivers licence because if you did you’d know filtering is perfectly legal for cyclists and motorbikes.

These guys? The ones who are no danger to others? ru-vid.comjgacSmLBSIQ

Like riding on the pavement and going through red lights.

Yes you are, but we all love Mikey. You numb nut

if you want to describe yourself in that way

*reports crime* "out to cause trouble" . Please refrain from voting. Thank you

@@KentRoadsIf you have any respect for this inadequate, sad little weasle then you are as deluded as Mikey is!

@@KentRoads Worst come back ever...

He's doing a good job, catching all those drivers breaking the rules. The rules are there for all road users. In one of Mikey's videos he films himself stopping on a pedestrian only crossing, this is actually an offence that carries a fixed penalty notice of £30. He didn't pay anything. Too many people break the rules and Mikey is one of those.

They could reflect on their own behaviour (and the possible disastrous outcomes of it) or….they could just throw a hyper-aggressive wobbly in RU-vid comments at the idea of the laws of the road being enforced.

That would require them to actually leave the station and do some police work . No chance 😂

Cut backs. Blame the Tory government.

1. That would require much more numbers, which they are already limited on. 2. If they could and did do that, you would ironically slate them saying “they should be out catching murderers”.

@@benjiskittshahahaha

@@TheBlitzkrieg the fines would pay the salaries.

Thanks very much!

As a cyclist I am broadly in support of your actions, e.g. Gandalf corner and filming people driving whilst texting, I am uncomfortable with the repeated pursuit of stationary motorists in Hyde Park, particularly the polite and repentant ones.

​@@regbarnard2866He's doing a good job, catching all those drivers breaking the rules. The rules are there for all road users. In one of Mikey's videos he films himself stopping on a pedestrian only crossing, this is actually an offence that carries a fixed penalty notice of £30. He didn't pay anything. Too many people break the rules and Mikey is one of those.

​@@CyclingMikeyHe's doing a good job, catching all those drivers breaking the rules. The rules are there for all road users. In one of Mikey's videos he films himself stopping on a pedestrian only crossing, this is actually an offence that carries a fixed penalty notice of £30. He didn't pay anything. Too many people break the rules and Mikey is one of those.

@@mrbensir 🤣 ive also seen motorbike police parked in a cycling lane on the pavement just chilling and mikey went and spoke to them about a phone user, and nothing about them being on the pavement 🤣🤣😂

​@jonahwhale9047 They do cause a lot of injuries riding on the pavement .... Also an elderly lady I was acquainted with was hospitalised and died 5 weeks later. ... Never got the culprit who rode off!

It's still an offence even when you've stopped in traffic. I suggest you familiarise yourself with the law and I'm sure Mikey will be happy to explain why it is still an offence. Mind you, if you bothered to look at some of his videos, I'm sure you would easily find the explanation.

@125brat the engine cuts off, so what's the offence? 😅😅😅 familiarize yourself with new cars

@@SillySlidingSloth good luck trying that line with magistrates! (Spoiler, you'll still get 6 points)

@tomquinn9765 it's not the point. The point is there is no point to film driver in standstill traffic. The guy thinks he's a hero so he rather go on the bridge and see who's driving with the phone in the hands then it will make sense

@@SillySlidingSloth I am very aware of stop-start engine technology as it's in the car I have BUT it still doesn't allow you to hold the phone and use it. The only time other than in an emergency is when the vehicle is parked, i. e. Engine SWITCHED off and parking brake applied.

It’s against the law.

@Dibley8899err, no it doesn't. if it was a requirement, how would you be able to satisfy the other requirement "use hand signals to indicate when you are about to turn"?

@Dibley8899 That law is not a legal requirement. The rule states: "You should ... keep both hands on the handlebars except when signalling or changing gear" "should" in the highway code means that it is a recommendation - not compulsory.

How about listening to audiobooks instead? Or is driving at all really that important for most of the drivers in London? I highly doubt that even half of them are carrying heavy cargo or picking up 3 kids from school that would make it impossible to choose public transport or even cycling over driving.

only really endangers the perpetuator funnily enough. Is it right? no. Is it the same as running a light in a 2000kg box of metal? no

You’re twice as likely to crash using a mobile phone as drink driving which makes you stupid.

He does look like he could be caught on peado hunter

spends his free time recording strangers, he is a creep

@@dubreg6711 Only strangers that are breaking the law. Maybe you didn't notice that?

@@CB-xr1eg use your brain that's the only footage he posts

@@dubreg6711 Ok genius, what/who else do you think he films?

No there not.

@@Scottish1996 If you're going to troll someone with a response then at least get use the correct grammar

@@GenialHarryGrout no, they’re not. Better? 😂 soft c*nt.

@GenialHarryGrout he can't...all the skin's missing from his knuckles from the friction.

no they are snitches....

I do not like the way he sneaks up on people, especially on Ladies, filming them in their cars. There must be privacy laws to stop this. its not his job, its down to the Police. He never does anything against cyclists breaking the law. Please go back to Zim, they deserve you we don't. Its sad his Father was killed by a drunk driver. I agree using a phone whilst driving can be dangerous, hands free kits are cheap and so many cars have them as standard. But whilst stopped in traffic, really.

No no no his cycling buddies wouldn't like that at all😂😂

You 'obviously' didn't watch the video as Mikey himself days he doesn't see himself as a vigilante.

@@Adventures_with_Sog Actually I did I've been aware of his peeping tom antics for some time now.

@@robinoconnor1203 Sounds like you're a little bitter there, been caught by him yourself have yer? 🤣😂

supergrass 😂

Stop smoking it.

You are excused.

I think he's well aware that someone out there might try to assault him, but he's prepared to take the risk. We can't be held hostage by bullies.

@robmcrob2091 But you're happy to bully motorists

Lets hope we get to see the recording!😂

@originalforgery these people are not victims. At best they are careless, at worst they think they're above rules which exist to prevent accidents.

Thanks very much!

He's doing a good job, catching all those drivers breaking the rules. The rules are there for all road users. In one of Mikey's videos he films himself stopping on a pedestrian only crossing, this is actually an offence that carries a fixed penalty notice of £30. He didn't pay anything. Too many people break the rules and Mikey is one of those.

No it isn't. These folks need to have an emotional reaction in order to appreciate the magnitude of what they are doing.

@@Wilem35”the magnitude of what they’re doing” - very dramatic You do realise we’re talking about people texting in traffic jams?

@@georgereed5266 Nope, talking about folks breaking the law and putting others at danger.

@@Wilem35 *by texting in traffic jams If it’s putting people in danger, how do you explain there being no accidents in any of mikeys videos?

@@georgereed5266 Are you obtuse? They break the law when driving quickly as well.

This is the truth. The people of Palestine are under constant bombardment because of America’s support for Israel’s crimes. The last bombing it did was bombing a hospital, which led to the death of 500 Palestinian citizens. Because of Israeli terrorism... cutting off water, gas, Electricity for the Palestinians, an undisputed people whose homes were destroyed by indiscriminate Israeli bombing, orphaned children, women, men, Old people are either waiting for their fate or have met their fate under the rubble.....#Palestine🇵🇸.....Save Palestine from the injustice of Israel and the hypocrisy of America.

Whatever happened to punctuation?

WaHt EvEr hApPeNeD tO PuNcTuAtIoN?

Well, no, he's in London.

​@@rogerkearns8094well yes. He is south african

@@alrightdave6135 He is actually Dutch ;)

@@alrightdave6135 Well no, I've no connection with South Africa.

​@@alrightdave6135he's Zimbabwean

​@jonahwhale9047""law"". A word the majority seem not to comprehend the accurate definition of. Lawful rebellion is against the "law" according to many police *OFFICErs.* 1829 and the overwhelmingly opposed institution of the Metropolitan Police in London should give you an indication as to why this is. 😠

@jonahwhale9047 who gets to decide that? Logical determination??

@jonahwhale9047 Repealed? Or simply made effectively impractical?? For example, with the fairly recent (though now thankfully overturned) legislation that stated that face masks were to be worn in church, that essentially clashed with the first clause of the 1215 Magna Carta (about the Church Of England remaining free). Whilst it had become the case that the Church Of England wasn't practicably free (because of this rationalisation about health, and that rationalisation about fines etc.), this in and of itself didn't change the objective arguments with respect to the clauses...just the physical and physiological amount of work people would be required to undertake to "undo" the hardship that the legislation/mandate was causing. My belief as to why Parliament began to exist around 80 years after Magna Carta's "agreement" (which - I'd actually like to make known, could *_technically_* have been considered an agreement reached under duress...the duress potentially, of EACH party concerned in their own ways), was to institute measures that "clawed back" our rights by hook or by crook (sorry, that's not an expression I like to use). As it so happens, I don't base my lawful principles on the 1215 Magna Carta...I base it on GOD being the perfectly fair judge of all of us. If I wrong somebody, I *ENJOY* righting it, without being asked to do so. I don't engage with courts or the "legal" system - nor even common law, for that matter, as even this can be fundamentally flawed. This too means that if I'm wronged, I don't interact with police or the legal system (or, again, common law) for the same reason. Though I endeavour to create the environment whereby somebody who has wronged me, can invite themselves to right it - under THEIR conditions. The 1215 Magna Carta happens to be a very well thought out document, which is useful for guidance.

@jonahwhale9047 As I understand it, half of the country were "freemen" during the period of King John. I do indeed have a suspicion that you're correct in that *_my_* ancestors could well have been in the "not free" category! 🙂 I should also make clear; My principles are based on Romans 13:1 KJV Bible *ONLY* - NOT other versions of the Bible that state that the governing "authorities" are "in charge", but rather, "higher powers". An assassinated ruler can't any longer wield said power, whereas GOD can't be assassinated. Any human being wielding said "authority" can only do so for as long as they're alive, and even *_they_* have to swear an oath to GOD (e.g. coronation oath and oaths taken in court (why would these be necessary if you were intending on telling the truth but still not believed thereafter anyway??)). Even "rulers" are under orders from GOD, and are no more (or no less) sovereign than any other of us (unless one chooses not to be). Birth certification bonding within weeks of coming into the world, is a devious tactic to attempt to elicit control in my opinion.

Do you have stats to back up your anecdotage?

You should be on stage...

he's well known and easily recognised. no cyclist with their own head cam has ever stuck up a video of him. so maybe, shockingly, he's another cyclist who actually follows the law there

@@SteveLoughran He's been featured on many cycling channels doing a bio on him and he's goes by the same name on cycling forums too. He's at risk of sensationalism and what that can bring, let's face the truth, that driver he's shopping could injure anyone's loved one, so he's actually doing EVERYONE a favour 👍

​@jonahwhale9047 but cyclists do kill pedestrians occasionally. Tell me, is one death ok for you?

Can you explain how he earns money on YT when it is streamed without ad-sense being enabled and does not carry advertisements- who do you think is paying him and what is the mechanism?

@@normanboyes4983you still get revenue streams look at yt terms and conditions

@@normanboyes4983 ask him yourself he admits on his Good Morning Britain interview that he makes money from doing this. its very easy to find

​@@normanboyes4983Eh? I just checked 5 of his videos - all monetised....

@@Clodhopping That’s now but not then.

Probably ruined a few too.

yea getting people to drive off in an agitated state is all about road safety

💯

Yeah, I agree. There must be something far more important in life instead of wasting his time doing this for RU-vid.

Why leave this irrelevant comment. This is about motorists breaking the law and having their offence brought to the attention of the judiciary. Mickey is not on trial.

@@normanboyes4983 The offence your referring to is looking at your phone when your stationary in traffic. I’ve done it a thousand times and I’ve never hit anyone so I know your not even talking about the safety side of things - you just care that it’s illegal, that it’s against the rules. Your almost as sad as him.

@@georgereed5266 Thank you for confirming your rather immature view of law breaking.

@@normanboyes4983 so is there no laws that you would consider breaking? You just blindly follow them without questioning why they’re there in the first place. I think your the one who’s immature, at least I can think for myself.

not a "vigilante", please go check, it takes seconds, he passes the info to the police, a vigilante does the judging and punishment as well.

@@007floppyboythose are weasel words… he passes it to the police knowing that the guy will get a fine. It’s like throwing someone into a lion enclosure then saying it’s not your fault if the guy gets eaten. Bullshit.

@@georgereed5266no, its the difference, and if you dont know that then you are part of the problem

@@007floppyboy if this guy was taking money from people you’d have no problem referring to him as a vigilante, but somehow because he’s getting the police to take money off people he’s not one. Your just an idiot.

This is the truth. The people of Palestine are under constant bombardment because of America’s support for Israel’s crimes. The last bombing it did was bombing a hospital, which led to the death of 500 Palestinian citizens. Because of Israeli terrorism... cutting off water, gas, Electricity for the Palestinians, an undisputed people whose homes were destroyed by indiscriminate Israeli bombing, orphaned children, women, men, Old people are either waiting for their fate or have met their fate under the rubble.....#Palestine🇵🇸.....Save Palestine from the injustice of Israel and the hypocrisy of America.ru-vid.comzMvSaP5yOiE?si=UL_S7U6CVhHwFxuU

An unusual term to use "on the right side of history " No doubt, extreme I grant you, Herr Hitler believed his actions were on the right side of history. Didn't necessarily make it right though?

@@martinmilam53 Sure, Jan.

@@mandellorian790really? which law? and that's a "real" law, a highway code "MUST", not a "SHOULD" and not one you've just made up like "cycling up the inside of a traffic jam" or "cycling in the centre of a lane"

Well, he is S. African !

They is no privacy in public .fool

Do you see anyone on the refuge? And before you say "That's why the driver went on the opposite side, because it was clear" Just not the same though is it. Even if someone was walking, what on earth is a 12kg bicycle moving at 5mph going to do? There's people who weigh more than the rider and bike combined walking around.

​@@ByteSizeDailyBreaking the law to tell someone off for breaking the law, do you not see how hypocritical that is? It doesn't matter how heavy the bike and rider are, they broke the law too. Why are you defending law breaking?

They're bereft of any sense of humour or even sense of the ridiculous!

Born in Zimbabwe and in Zimbabwe at the age of 19 (when his father tragically lost his life) although he denies being South African. His accent sure as hell sounds Rhodesian

@jonahwhale9047 you clearly got dropped on your head while not wearing a helmet

@jonahwhale9047 that’s why they use them in all professional sports and are very useful for low speed crashes. Got it

@jonahwhale9047 i'll take my helmet off my 3yr old if that's the case. Been racing 2 wheels for 30 years and you talk total B88locks but you go and don't ride a helmet your life i really don't care.

@jonahwhale9047 yea I raced bicycles as well as a semi pro, not wearing a helmet is F••king idiotic. I’ve had two serious bicycle crashes in which the shell has broken on my helmet and walked away so yea keep on arguing that they won’t work. Moron

@jonahwhale9047 ha go keeping riding with an open face and tell me how it works out when your chin slides on the tarmac. GET A MODULAR and stop being a poser 🤡

How would you feel if the police diverted resources away from drunk or uninsured drivers and instead directed it at cyclists

@@philroo1 what a bizarre comment. Of course not. I would prefer people to not polarise this debate about road safety into 'camps' or 'groups'. Instead, 'any' road user who is breaking the law and endangering others should be reported to make the roads safer. I don't care if it's car drivers, horse riders, cyclists or anyone else - if their actions are dangerous, they need to face the consequences

@@OldCarsNewVan that's a nice ideal you've described there, back to reality though, should crimes that cause the most harm be prioritised?

Why should he? The vast majority of road deaths are caused by cars

@@EdwardLindon Because it would be less confrontational and more 'open' to get everyone on-board to road safety if the title read 'The Cyclist catching Britain's ROAD USERS behaving badly'. That way these 'camps' wouldn't rise up and the important message wouldn't be lost

No take him.

That’s not something to brag about and no one wants to go to a gutter like Poland

Please take him, we don’t want him

Many people he reports are prosecuted and fined so how is he ineffective?

@@CB-xr1eg He's literally caught the same guy twice, which proves catching a guy once doesn't work. The "I've got you on film" tactics don't do anything towards the education of safety.

@@monovon If the guy is caught twice doing the same thing then he's a moron. Most of the people caught don't re-offend.

@@CB-xr1eg yeah so Mikey has zero power over morons. Education fixed morons, not Mikey

@@CB-xr1eg I don't think I'll ever be convinced that what Mikey does has any real benefit on society.

This is the truth. The people of Palestine are under constant bombardment because of America’s support for Israel’s crimes. The last bombing it did was bombing a hospital, which led to the death of 500 Palestinian citizens. Because of Israeli terrorism... cutting off water, gas, Electricity for the Palestinians, an undisputed people whose homes were destroyed by indiscriminate Israeli bombing, orphaned children, women, men, Old people are either waiting for their fate or have met their fate under the rubble.....#Palestine🇵🇸.....Save Palestine from the injustice of Israel and the hypocrisy of America.

Why dont you do it?

Yeah why don't you do it? Or are you one of those guys who like to encourage others to do something you don't want to do yourself?

This is the truth. The people of Palestine are under constant bombardment because of America’s support for Israel’s crimes. The last bombing it did was bombing a hospital, which led to the death of 500 Palestinian citizens. Because of Israeli terrorism... cutting off water, gas, Electricity for the Palestinians, an undisputed people whose homes were destroyed by indiscriminate Israeli bombing, orphaned children, women, men, Old people are either waiting for their fate or have met their fate under the rubble.....#Palestine🇵🇸.....Save Palestine from the injustice of Israel and the hypocrisy of America.

what grassing

Cyclists do indeed behave badly and they should be pulled up for it. The statistics suggest greater numbers of badly behaved distracted car drivers. So easier to spot. Potential for harm is greater from a distracted driver. Focusing on drivers does the most good.

“What about this other thing?” Whataboutism

I agree with ramesh_manga. The police are responsible for road safety and as cyclists kill 3-5 people a year and drivers 1500, it's easy to understand why the police focus on prosecuting drivers rather than cyclists.

Were you to wave a magic wand and instantly make all cyclists behave perfectly, road KSI stats wouldn't change noticeably. Do the same for drivers instead, and you'll stop almost all traffic deaths and injuries. Do you see why I don't bother with cyclists now?

​@citizensmitt u mean what about breaking the law on a bike???

Thanks very much! There are lots of people doing this, not just me.

it's not really some rocket science to understand why. It's because drivers have the biggest potential to cause harm to others on the road. Cyclists, ebike, escooters don't. It's just really that simple. BUt you can believe in conspiracy theories rather being reasonable.

​@@tyren818 where do you get conspiracy theory from? Next you are going to read right wing racist into this !. I have had too many close calls from e-scooters etc on pavements. A few weeks ago, if I had not been very close to my 99 year old uncle, he would have been knocked over on the pavement by an e-scooter. I find this unacceptable, the rider did not even stop to see if my uncle was ok. I cycle too . I stop at the lights I obey the rules of the road. I do however see far too many cyclists who just don't care for the rules of the road. Are you saying the rules of the road should only be enforced for car drivers and the e-scooters, e-bikers and cyclists can do what they like?

The kind of people who snitch on someone using a phone in a stationary line of traffic are the same kind of people who will snitch on their neighbours for smoking a joint imho. Thank god they are the tiniest of minorities.

Yes really. In nearly all these mass shootings in the US the perps have been cannabis users. It triggers psychotic episodes in certain people. Surely we need to snitch in our neighbours if they are users? @@homie3461

You're not the sharpest are you? And you are missing the point completely. It's pretty obvious that texting while stationary in a motor vehicle is an order of magnitude LESS dangerous than a cyclist jumping lights or an e-scooter zooming along the pavement. @@tyren818

Where? Ever been to Istanbul, or Naples?

@@Anygodwilldo yes, been to both. We need safer roads in Britain.

This is the truth. The people of Palestine are under constant bombardment because of America’s support for Israel’s crimes. The last bombing it did was bombing a hospital, which led to the death of 500 Palestinian citizens. Because of Israeli terrorism... cutting off water, gas, Electricity for the Palestinians, an undisputed people whose homes were destroyed by indiscriminate Israeli bombing, orphaned children, women, men, Old people are either waiting for their fate or have met their fate under the rubble.....#Palestine🇵🇸.....Save Palestine from the injustice of Israel and the hypocrisy of America.

@@davet11 All taxpayers pay "their share" of the cost of roads and emergency services, anyone who thinks otherwise simply has no idea how the UK Tax system works. However, the fact is that most cyclists or walkers pay considerably more for the upkeep of our roads than any damage they could do to them, it is motor vehicles that damage the roads due to weight and sudden acceleration/braking, not the average person walking or on a 10kg bike.

I ride a bike, rarely stop at red lights. If its clear I'm going through

@@Anygodwilldo That makes you a criminal (amongst other adjectives) in the UK.

@@BeeblebroxTV Ignored the test, licence and registration issue there.

@@drummerjo571 Victimless crime I'm cool with that

Well no. I live in London and there's nothing you can do about that. The idea that anyone anywhere could video you any time takes all the fun out of anti-social driving. The sense of paranoia really eats away at you. 3rd party video reporting has exploded across the UK. In London in 2022 almost 15,000 such prosecutions were started. There are tens of thousands of people videoing and reporting bad driving.

Sitting on there bums, thieving, shootings, murderers,druges, knife crime dosent make money.

it's not snitching, it's a service, if the only consequence for distracting driving was drivers killing themselves then I'd agree on it. But you can cause harm to others, how is that ok? That's why state has laws against it made by people who are way smarter than you and me.

@@tyren818 way smarter? Please speak for yourself 🙃 Also, I don't see how I can kill others if I text in stationary traffic. Maybe someone way smarter than me can enlighten me.

@@Donkavision-sx4js okay, but if they are stupid to still disagree, then they can see your face in court I assume?

Many motorists don't stop for them either.

How many cyclists have killed pedestrians.....er ...about 2.

I see more car drivers ignoring traffic lights than cyclists. I see more car drivers ignoring road traffic rules and regulations in general.

@Donkavision-sx4js take it ur a cyclist??

He's doing a good job, catching all those drivers breaking the rules. The rules are there for all road users. In one of Mikey's videos he films himself stopping on a pedestrian only crossing, this is actually an offence that carries a fixed penalty notice of £30. He didn't pay anything. Too many people break the rules and Mikey is one of those.

And?

Not really. The vast majority of fatalities and serious injuries on our roads are caused by bad drivers of motor vehicles. If you feel so strongly about cyclists breaking the law you are completely free to start a campaign of your own.

you are free to do that yourself-nobody is stopping you

@@michaelhaslam6089 I don't feel strongly - it was an observation. One rule for those he dislikes and one for those he likes.

Road tax? you mean the excise duty for emissions??

Funny enough he "forgot" about that bit!!!! and what his father was up to serving with the Rhodesian security forces and "defending" the Rhodesian racist regime!!!

He knows the deal which is why he tries to pretend he is from Holland ... he is full of sh!t@@Donkavision-sx4js

The stats and research dont back up your claim.

@@michaelhaslam6089 that’s because stats look at injuries etc…I am talking about cyclists are the most dangerous as they Blatantly break red lights, jump on and off pavements, swerve through, cut off traffic… they may not cause as many injuries but they are the most dangerous people. A bike colliding with a car causes no damage and is not recorded yet everyone sees what a nuisance a significant proportion of cyclists are. Just watch RU-vid. And this bloke reporting drivers who are stationary stuck in traffic…

@@IansOddInterests I know you think you’re making sense and writing coherently but you’re not.

​@@homie3461but cyclists can be very dangerous to pedestrians, when doing stupid things like riding on footpaths.

what u yapping about@@IansOddInterests

No it's not. The point is to upload it to his "channel". And if you've read the posts on his "channel" you'll realise a lot of these people are seriously unhinged. It should be illegal to do this. Hopefully the law will be changed.@jonahwhale9047

Your attitude is loathsome. All Mickey is doing is provide evidence to the Police and Judiciary - it is then down to due process. No one is being tried on YT.

I'm 100 percent with you. Police state by proxy - it is a nasty, disgraceful slippery slope

@@Lalallalu You just the freedom to act illegally.

Very well said!

Mikey is very clear in the video. He is not a vigilante. Vigilantes take the law into their own hands and act as judge and jury. Mikey does the opposite.

What search terms do I put into RU-vid to find this clip? I’m sure you must have posted the clip at least once for every time you posted your comment, right?

Oh, you have posted no videos on your channel.

He is allowed to stop on a pedestrian crossing in order to stop injury or damage. Would the court accept that filming / stopping a driver using a mobile phone fits that criteria? Any magistrate will say yes and you should spend two hours cycling in London to see how dangerous it is and how many drivers are on their phones before you pass judgement on him.

@@brianm102 actually, Mickey already admitted he did wrong.

You are welcome to start your own channel since this has offended you so badly.