The Difference Between Stefan11222 and GTO 

Watch me attempt QY's quiz here: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-AN9BX_USXBA.html

Alternate title: “How to Level Yourself Into Getting Owned by Top Set”

You maybe don’t realize how much this video is good.The transition with the film (one of my favourite),the analisys of the spot,it’s very very instructive and enjoyable.Keep Going.⭐️⭐️ TA - DAAA at the end Kill me 😂(99 💀) 😂😂

So basically you are saying that my NL5 maniac opponents play the Stefan line... No wonder I am losing to them

Great collaboration between two of the best poker communicators on the platform. Entertaining yet very instructive content.

This channel is amazing, quality just keeps getting better and better. Keep at it, you have talent for this!

2CC video = instant like

Love this content SO MUCH 2CC these concepts are so important. Thank you!

There's a lot of this in chess. If you watch top GM games they obviously play engine moves (solver strategy type play) but also play novelties and slight tweaks to play for wins and they feel gives them edge. I think this will be the poker direction.

what i don't get is i heard modern poker theory, utg, bet smaller --even with premium hand-. its less about protecting your hand rather building smaller pots when OOP. But then when its in the blinds, we're supposed to 3b big. Shouldn't the same theory of smaller bets OOPs? keep things manageable? Or is it because UTG we're RFI and in the blinds we're looking for fold equity?

stefan video=like

thanks for putting the source of the clips

precious content. Do you guys provide and CFP project?

I see Giraffe I click

1/7 damnnnn,when am I going to be as good as Giraffe?should I change my name to elephant or fox?

Every pro hand without the big names, you would think it's NL1😂 Poker is so hard

Masterclass :)

"tadaaahh, it´s gone" sehr gut,

Most underrated poker content on RU-vid 🤍

Such a good video🎉

Fantastic video

Exploit faz GTO foldar várias vezes, mas uma hora GTO leva todo o pote

WAKE UP EVERYONE!

Some people play bad poker and call it's exploitative😢

That last question sure was tricky ;) Thanks for having me, this was a lot of fun!

Well done guys. Having subtitles is really great. I'm not good at English so I usually use automatic translation subtitles. Hope you will add subtitles in your next videos. Thanks a lot!!!

All this talk, all this analysis, changing the preflop range according to sizing... Just for BTN to have top set anyway. They. Always. Have. It.

I really love your content! I hope you keep at it and I know you can reach 50k+ subs this year!

What a fking punt. I admit I do these maniac plays for experiment also, can assure you that it is losing play or break-even at most. Right now trying to eleminate this as a leak because it impacts my winrate negatively.

In question #3 I think it is "bigger", if you look at the % bet size clearly in 3bet small it uses the large size much more

How to donk off all your money and feel like you’re a genius.

hmmm, surprised how badly giraffe did. Question 5 was pretty obvious.

Why 65h be a call more often than 65s or 65c on the river? I cant’t understand

The bane overlays are so good with stefan's profile pic of the monkey... bahahaha I will show you! And then... i will break you Bets almost pot size bahahaha bro i'm dddyeeing laughing so hard

Lmaoo thought dex was gonna roll over A high.

...and then stefan says it was just a misclick pre and decided to go with it.. :D

Great video and great editing with one of my favorite movies

amazing amigo mio, nothing more to say, now I'm going to the QY channel

Haha great video 😂 nice ending

Please tell poker giraffe to make more videos

Did not see that surprise ending coming! I was fully on board and would have made the same moves for the same reasons…I put the button on KJo or something similar 🤦🏻‍♂️

Next level YT poker content, thanks man.

Agromonkey, what gro u r saying about?

Marius makes your stack disappear

slam dunk like-on-video channel vibes

Super interesting video🎉❤

How this solver was created?

😂 I love the storytelling

??? why so optimal ???

Lmao love the ending 😂😂😂

Great video. I am looking foward for the next video.

Great vid mate

Congrats for the video

amazing video

im shocked i actually got them all right, although my reasoning for the last one was a little incorrect it seems. my opinion was thought BTN SHOULD actually have the A6hh and K6hh that folds the flop, simply because as BTNs range is wider, they have to float a little more, and these feels like good candidates. in addition i thought solver would find more bluffs that arent 6x or 7x, so overall blocking the straight is more important than blocking the small amount of bluffs - which led to me to think it was an extremely close call, but a call nonetheless. however if solver doesnt have these combos anyway, its an even better call. Q6 was my favorite, i took about 10 minutes thinking on this one. love the video.

Amazing

Isn’t exploitative and gto just a false dichotomy in poker? Every good player knows gto and I’ll take it a step further that all pro exploitative players also know gto but deviate because they have a tell.

found question 3 a bit confusing because are we talking absolute size or %of pot? Since the flop pot is a different size in theory a bet could be smaller in absolute size but a bigger %

Very nice content !!

16:29 i dont understand how BTN is more polar when they're using a smaller sizing

Great and informative video as always, i love those theory questions wether here in this video or on the posts you do sometimes, its always a good refreshment of things learnt and helps to understand things quicker

Great format! Qing Yang really knows his stuff!

Ty 2CC for another great video 👏🥳 Was rly fun to watch. It's a snap like 🥰 Greetings from FR

Congrats bro. Such an awesome content. insane!! I really liked this quizz format.

15" POKER HAAAAARRRRDDD

hmmm , my logic with the 56 hand,on turn is : smaller 3 bet pre means the stack to pot ratio is higher on turn , thats a reason to call more with 56 , so the pot is smaller was correct or not?

You remind me of [pG]Korn :)

How come only 56hh call the river, but not cc or ss? Usually I understand why, but not in this spot? Is it because they don't continue from earlier streets because we lack the backdoor flush draw?

Helloo!,I got one quick question regarding question 6.In what refers to the answers, B) and C) may be kind of of similar? ,since the more polar you are,the more air you have in your betting range,so I would group them in only one answer maybe.Aniways,what I don't get is this point:The main question itself emphasizes to find the difference between those two situations (the smaller and the bigger 3bet size) ,but it seems to me that this BTNS betting range in the turn being more polar will apply to both situations (big and small 3bet size) basically for the nature of the lines and board.In that sense,wouldn't be more appropriate (considering what we are emphazising in the main question) to consider option c) instead?.Since the fact that we 3bet small(which would lead to having a smaller pot post flop),allow both ranges to be wider so,we are forced aniways to call a wider proportion of our range as sb vs a turb bet in order to avoid folding too much.At least if we focus on comparing the two situations ,that would be a more plausible answer to me.

Loved this

Well done guys, tks a lot!

How did i, basic 200nl reg answer all correctly, but the “ solver expert “ with a yt channel, manage to fuck up basic principles? Turns out all solver experts can only operate on their memorization. No creative problem solving at all. They’re all just a GTO Library for 100bb 6max cashgames.

can you take out editing child kindergarden noises please

For question 4 I am slightly confused with the explanation, I understood up to the point where giraffe says that the BB has a lot more junky hands which pull down the betting frequency, but then the conclusion is that the range bets more often? I don't get the logic, surely it would be the opposite where those junky hands are going to want to make it so we cbet less often?

1 thing i disagreed with is that you said early on that btn cannot have TT+ (presumably because he only called the 3bet) - that's obviously not true. it's unlikely TT or JJ will be 4bet (because they don't want to get 5bet) and QQ+ will obviously get slowplayed sometimes and QQ might even be included in the TT-JJ don't want to get 5 bet category. clearly btn treated 99 the same way. if he's playing 99 that way he's playing TT that way.

5:40 He had 56s not 54s.