Jaspers is such a strong player. He can take any tournament at any time when he’s on. My favorite has always been caudron but I love watching jaspers play.
Set üzerinden usta oyuncuların oynaması oyunu kalitesini düşürüyor. Usta oyuncu gerektiğinde zaten neredeyse ortalaması bir set kadar olan seri yakalaya biliyor. Bu mantıkta setli oyunlarda düz oyuna giriyor. Risk alınmayan oyunlar ; videolardan izlediğim kadarı ile çok kaliteli oyunlar göremedim .Yine de Bay Jaspers tebrik ederim. Dünyada kalitesini duruşunu ispatlanmış usta bir oyuncudur.
Amazing play from Jaspers as always. But this format seems off putting to many of us. A player that scores less can win (for ex., player A vs player B: 10-9; 0-10; 0-10; 10-9; 10-9. Player A scored 30 points, player B scored 47; player A wins). It impedes high runs and disrupts the game flow: you are on a high run, and suddenly it is cut and your opponent breaks. Breaking the flow of the game even impedes specific-game high averages that can only happen on a long run format and when the player is allowed to play until a final score (40 in 10 innings types of game). Listen to the crowd cheering on underdog Dion Nelin vs Cho-Jae Ho at the Randers 2019 WC when he was on a +10 run: we will never get this on this new format. The even shorter clock, and no timeouts, may lead occasionally to poor shot selection and/or poor execution as well (few at this level, but have happened). Averages did not seem to be affected at this tournament (mean average was pretty much the same as top 16 Antalya World Cup players, for instance), but we need a wider sample of tourneys played (in this new format) to evaluate. Organizers should be wary of making clock times lower and lower. Add to all of this the fact that, at this level, runs of 10 or 5 are not that uncommon, and the result is a random, fluke-like competition. Less sets with a higher point limit would be far more sensible. There is a general trend to appeal to a wider, younger public. Famous "shorter attention spans", plus the idea that everything needs to be made into a full of tension spectacle. Hence, I believe, the shorter clock+no timeout, and set format. I'm young, but the exception. This game is mainly enjoyed by older generations, and few people my age understand or care the slightest in this game. Unless you are Korean maybe, or Turkish. This is a highly technical sport, not the same as snooker or pool. It is mainly people who have played it and studied it who enjoy watching it. Few youngsters play 3 cushion for starters; but almost anyone has played pool. Snooker is much less widespread, but you do not need any specific knowledge (whether theoretical or practical) to enjoy it. You should remember that, in making these young-appealing formats, you forget your actual audience: older gents that don't mind a minute clock, that don't mind players calculating a shot to inch perfection, that want to see high runs, that want to see a player trying to come back from the deeps of being 20+ points down because they know how difficult it is. They know it because they have played the game, I stress once again. We want high quality, perfectionist 3 cushion, not showcase, thrill-to-watch 3 cushion billiards. Artistic billiards serves this second purpose. Please remember, quality of play for your actual game lovers comes before dynamism for potential consumers.
Klopt dit format is waardeloos. Geen hoge series meer, niet meer in een mooie flow zijn als speler! en te korte tijdklok waardoor spelers door tijd druk fouten gaan maken waardoor het mooie hoge niveau van de spelers verdwijnt! Welke bobo verzint dit? En dan nog iets! Biljarten word niet populairder door een tijdklok in te korten en kortere sets. Nee als je biljarten op de kaart wil zetten moet je het vaker uitzenden op de reguliere tv! Daarna kun je meer biljart centrum's openen en kan de sport groeien! ------------------------This format is worthless. No more high runs, no more being in a nice flow as a player! and too short a time clock that causes players to make mistakes due to time pressure, so that the beautiful high level of the players disappears! Which bobo made this up? And then something else! Billiards is not getting more popular by shortening a time clock and shorter sets. No, if you want to put billiards on the map, you have to broadcast it more often on regular TV! After that you can open more billiard centers and the sport can grow!
Bence Saygıner,, Jaspers tanda Blomdahl dende daha iyi çok daha iyi... Düz oynayan oyuncular daha kolay sayı alırlar. Düz oynayan oyuncuların Topa vuruş noktaları sınırlıdır. Saygıner için topta vurulabilecek misâl, 15 nokta varken bunlar 7 noktayla oynarlar, noktaların çapı da küçüktür. Çok bilen çok yanılır derler. Ezberciler her zaman kazanır. Konu sayı almaksa çasper şampiyon. Çasper, Birçok Saygıner atışının nası sayı olduğunu çözemez bile,, Konu kaliteyse Saygıner bu işin kralı,, Benim bakış açıma göre durum bu...
Aunque Zanetti se recupero bien en el segundo set. En el tercer set Jaspers prácticamente lo dejó sentado. ¡Bien por Jaspers! Me cae muy bien por su sencillez. Zanetti es muy bueno, pero a veces es un poco pretencioso.
Por qué estos eventos los organiza la umb y caudron no forma parte de esta organizacion así como otros jugadores , Zapata , kasidokostas, están en la pba en Korea , pero claro que al que más se le extraña en estos eventos es a caudron
No hay información sobre este high run de 28 de Jaspers en torneos oficiales, sólo se conoce a 4 que lo poseen: Junichi Komori (Japón) 1993, Raymond Ceulemans (Bélgica) 1998, Roland Forthomme (Bélgica) 2012 y Frederic Caudron (Bélgica) 2013. quizás fue en entrenamiento.
