The Earliest Years Of Earth's 4.6 Billion Year History 

🤣

your hearing is way to bad...haha.

@@Joshua-dj5lb 😂

Agree 👍

Its a college textbook piped into TTS

This documentary excels in its detailed, well-organized presentation of Earth's formation and early life. It’s educational, engaging, and the natural narration complements the content perfectly. Highly commendable work!

maybe you should just not listen to what other people say. wait too much i know

Its a textbook narrated with TTS

science keep improving the better

Yeah. That's why I'm suspicious of a lot they say on these videos too

​@@jeffslist6878 Yes, you have to sift the wheat from the chaff. YT is full of utter garbage - it's the nature of such a platform, but for example 'Astrum' is pretty good.

@@jeffslist6878 science adjusts as knowledge and observation improves. there is nothing wrong with that process. Religion hasn't changed in thousands of years and yet it claims to always be the absolute truth.

@@h2ophilter what's religion got to do with these videos?

I agree with you, I would hardly call it music though a cacophony of noise perhaps? !

I’m sure it sounds nice in a Dolby home theatre set up 😁

Same.. I want listen to this st bed time but the volume is all over the place and loud bangs happen after I fall asleep...

@@indecent0079sounds incredible with the AirPods 2 pros or whatever they’re called. Incredible audio tbh

They either block their content in your region, or upload badly mixed trash people can barely watch. Spark sucks.

I agree, the worst offenders are documentaries with ridiculous guitar melodies, poor music choices ruin even a good documentary ✌️❤️🇬🇧

What's even more interesting, IMO, is we might not even be all that rare considering how many planets there are and how huge the universe is thought to be.

I’m sure they are working on that as we speak….

👍👍

Jupiter and Saturn reversed their direction AWAY from the sun orbiting more outwardly into the solar system 😉 I know I thought the same thing and had to rewind that part several times.

For now... not consensus just more and more genius-level insights moving the goldposts. (delib typo)

Had they formed together, the Moon would have likely had a somewhat more substantial iron core, which it doesn't. The basalts on it's surface are however, very similar to those found on the Earth. The Earth's iron core is also proportionately much larger than those of the other terrestrial planets, because it likely consists of both it's original core, and that of the impactor. The low density of the moon is another clue. Lighter crustal debris from the collision remained in orbit around the Earth, forming the Moon, while the heavier core debris from both bodies stayed behind. The Moon's low gravity, lack of a substantial magnetic field, and other factors, explain why if wasn't able to retain a substantial quantity of volatile elements and compounds. Because this all happened so long ago, and so much has changed on the surfaces of both bodies and the solar system in general, this whole idea will always remain a hypothesis, but it seems to be the best fit at the moment. Cheers.

@@stargazer5784 that makes sense. thank you for the explanations.

They have found huge chucks of the moon inside earth. Might have something to do with the strong magnetic anomalies under south America I think. Its been awhile.

Hmmm I’m getting the sounds though they aren’t great but aren’t loud either..

Don't you know what 'hypothesis' means?

@@bertharius9518 please tell me where it says hypothesis in “the earliest years of earths 4.6 billion year history”?

@@bertharius9518 🤡

@@benyoung1224 Check and _mate!_

@@benyoung1224 There will never be forensic evidence, because plate tectonics, water and life changes, etc: ergo hypothesis is implicit as it should be with all science.

It's quite likely that all the planetary bodies of the inner Solar System had substantial amounts of water early in their histories, but over billions of years, geological and astronomical processes have left only the Earth wet. Due to sputtering from the solar wind, Mars lost most of its atmosphere and water to space. Although most of its water is gone, huge amounts of water still remain on Mars in the form of ice, permafrost, and groundwater. The composition of the Venusian atmosphere is an enigma, particularly the sheer amount of sulfuric acid it contains. The best explanation requires Venus to have started out as an ocean world. The Sun, like all stars, gradually brightens with age. Water vapor is a greenhouse gas, and Venus receives about twice the sunlight that we do. At some point, Venus would have entered a runaway greenhouse effect. As its oceans vaporized, the water was mostly lost to photodissociation and sputtering. As the planet's crust was baked, it degassed both mineral-bound water and oxides of carbon and sulfur. What water remains on Venus is bound up in the sulfuric acid clouds that shroud it. The Apollo samples were limited to the Lunar surface at low latitudes. Having been baked, for billions of years, in constant vacuum and daytime temperatures over 100°C, it's unsurprisingly that the samples contain very little mineral-bound water. Global observations have revealed that with increasing latitude and subsurface depth, the Moon is actually quite rich in mineral-bound water, and underground ice is common near the Lunar poles. Mercury is underexplored, and it experiences even more extreme heating than the Moon. Despite this, high latitudes on Mercury have been shown to possess a similar gradient of mineral-bound water, with polar stores of subsurface ice. Despite being 71% covered in liquid water, the Earth has also lost a tremendous amount of its original surface water - mainly to sunlight and life. Like on Venus, water vapor in the upper atmosphere gets broken by UV radiation into hydrogen and oxygen. The Earth's gravity is too weak to keep a hold on hydrogen, so it quickly gets blown away into space. Unlike on Venus, autotrophic life breaks apart huge amounts of water. The oxygen gets dumped into the atmosphere as waste. Most of the hydrogen, however, gets metabolized with carbon dioxide to produce biomass. Inevitably, however, a small amount of hydrogen escapes into the atmosphere. In summary, Mars and the Moon are too small, Venus and Mercury are too hot, and even the Earth doesn't have what it started with.

You're not just wrong, you're incredibly stupid! 🤪

Absolutely wrong.

Wait a minute...you mean to tell me that this is not first hand video evidence?? But they sound so convincing... _it _*_must_*_ be true!_

Holy jumpin’ you guys are dense

Religious zealots seek out these kind of videos so they can act like trolls and show their ignorance. Typical.

Humanity is a long way from the formation of earth mate!

That’s not a hypothesis

What's your theory? Big sky daddy got bored and magicked it into existence and then went thru several oops stages until people ended up? Or are you one of those dinosaur deniers?

That's how science works. It adapts to new discoveries, as opposed to believing fantasy stories dreamt up by primitive people who knew jack shit about anything.

Because there is no evidence of that.

@@lucillasallabank have you not experienced a Miracle at some point? Where there was no other explanation except Devine intervention. I am betting almost everybody has at some point or another or will at some point.

Yes, God specifically created everything including you so that you could one day go on RU-vid and annoy perfect strangers with bullshit and misspelled the word divine. Please do the rest of us a favor and go meet God immediately.

There's a good reason for that. Science is about proof and you have none.

How would God have made the Earth if not by the laws that govern all His creations?

The scientific method behind this information also created the technology of the internet and the device you are using to view it. If you cannot accept science, you should not be allowed to benefit from it. You cannot cherry pick which parts of science you want to believe in - it's all or nothing. Please cease and desist all use of technology and go and live in a cave.

and the 'truth' is....?

@@bertharius9518 ...NOT this video!

@@mbgrafix I'm guessing that 'Jesus' figures in your version of truth. Haha. It's certainly easier to deal with than scientific enquiry, which can be intellectually challenging at times. Oh well, go in peace.

​@@bertharius9518You've given a much more restrained response than I would have. Religious interpretations of science have, especially in recent years, have resulted in untold death and suffering.

then go back to your fairy tales and stop bothering the adults

Random chance

Fuck God

Your comments have no place here. You have no proof of any of your fantasy beliefs.

And it IS too loud