The END TIMES | Prophecy according to Biblical Context | Joel 4 | Part 1 Lesson 8 

Shalom. My Bible doesn’t have Joel chapter 4?

Baruch HaShem & Shalom Shalom Israel!!! 🙏🇮🇱❤️🇮🇱🙏🇺🇸🙏

So I must ask, do you think the April 8th eclipse doesn't give a warning? It travels over 7 Nineveh in the U.S. ?

💘

Howdy Brothers and Sisters! 🙏🏼❤️🇺🇸🇮🇱

💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽💪🏽

April 8th is the New Moon

Does ANYONE KNOW WHEN THIS WAS THOUGHT, or GIVEN? At the Very End HE MAKES Two VERY IMPORTANT STATEMENTS, Gaza Lebanon before the year, 2023 ?

Shabbat shalom tom, I just substitute 'goyim' in place of 'nations'. For myself, it's simpler

The Crusades were justified wars against hundreds of years of Islamic aggression. Europe would be speaking Arabic and bowing down to the Kaaba today if it were not for the Crusades.

Last night was lunar a eclipse.

Mark biltz admits john hagee basically stole the word about it & wala

Hopefully no one here spent 100.00 on his leather bound copy of his stolen work

Quit looking at the bloody moon man. I’m quoting a person from UK. lol.

But all that say they are Jews are not

Not sure why he is repeatedly and persistently calling this chapter 4, he read to us chapter 3 and there is no Joel 4. His reading of Joel 2:32 and calling it 3:5 suggests he is reading from some strange Bible with an unusual verse numbering, or far worse; an extra chapter. This is quite alarming. Then, in an earlier message I heard him declare that our KJV has “added verses” that should be removed. This is also very alarming. I don’t trust anyone that wants to alter the received Scriptures. The original Greek and subsequent Hebrew are very old. The KJV was very accurately translated from the Septuagint Greek through only two previous translations from the Greek with very little alterations in striving for perfect translation. I have no idea what this guy is reading but you don’t remove verses. Then, separate topic, I don’t understand why so many just ignore the “earth quake” and “heavens shall tremble” and the “stars withdraw their shining” in order to make an eclipse out of the “sun and moon going dark” in the prophecy (Joel 2:10-11). If you actually believe the Bible as written, this is going to be a catastrophic event. In what universe do the stars stop shining during an eclipse? If the eclipse is during the day, the stars aren’t shining anyway so they can’t stop shining because of the eclipse, and if it’s at night you don’t see the eclipse because it’s below your horizon, and the stars don’t stop shining. Can we stop trying to explain away the prophecy and instead expect that God actually meant the event will be unique? Too many preachers today go back in history to prove bloodmoon eclipses are significant signs and present the amazing notion that an eclipse falling on a Jewish feast day is an unquestionable sign. Why hide the fact the the Jewish feasts are on a lunar calendar. Of course a bloodmoon eclipse is going to happen on a Jewish feast day. It would be amazing if it DIDN’T! How about going back through history and showing all the other catastrophic events that DIDN’T have a bloodmoon. It’s easy to make connections that just aren’t there, in order to create drama. Of course God has made it clear that he intends to do great things on the representative feast days, and of course eclipses must happen on feast days, but that doesn’t mean an eclipse has some ominous significance of a great event. I appreciate this preacher’s correcting presentation but am still very Leary of his questionable reverence for scripture. Just one correction: John Hagee didn’t coin the term “Blood Moon,” I have been hearing that term in church since the 70s as referencing that prophetic event of “the moon turn to blood”, and I have also heard it incorrectly used to describe the reddish eclipse long before Mr, Hager.

The tetrad that occurred in 1949-50 was the year after the establishment of the modern Nation of Israel and 1493-94 was the year after the Spanish monarchy dispelled the Jews from Spain. To say that “nothing correlates with the tetrads of the following years of those two dates seems somewhat intellectually dishonest.