THE ENERGY REVOLUTION HAS BEGUN - Test Renault Twizy with 3 KW E-Cat 

As R.Feynman said: "the sole test of the validity of any idea is experiment". In light of the preparation of new tests, I would like to propose an experiment design . To evaporate 11L water 1L LPG is needed (7 KWh). So if ECat fits into a volume of 1 L and vaporizes 11L of water (brought to 100°C earlier), it will exceed the energy density of chemical fuel. Such test will be difficult to fake.

@@_-martin-_ secondo me è solo un tuo punto di vista, i testimoni erano entusiasti

@@gavinomamia I hope you are right. However, if Rossi's purpose with the demonstration is to attract investors so he can start production, then surely he could do a much better job!

Can such a small battery (half of the one supplied) triple the autonomy?

@@gavinomamia This implies trusting the readings, but lets say they are truthful - an innovation in battery technology is not necessarily a demonstration of effective ZPE extraction. It would be impressive nontheless

The orginal battery 100kg 70km... The new car made 200km with 180kg battery+ecat. So in any case he invented a better battery. I'm sad because he did only 200km. Imagine 400km what do you think with only 80kg plus?😂 Something he did. We don't know what and how.

@@gavinomamia The Twizy battery pack is of old technology (>10 yrs). Current li-ion battery packs have more than 300 Wh/Kg of density. An 80 Kg pack has a capacity of 24 KWh. To drive for 200 Km and charge the battery, about 20KWh are needed. Well within a modern li-ion pack. In the press conference was said tha even Marzocchi didn't watched inside the steel box. Rossi said that the steel box was for safety, but when inquired on the accident, he said that the battery exploded, not the E-cat. So why protect the e-cat with a steel box? Finally at the end of the press conference a journalist was asking of energy density. Rossi talked with some off camera guy and the press conference abruptly ended. So i am not convinced. And i follow him since 2011... He should have driven for at least 12 hours, as planned one year ago...

@@_Phoenix_. you have to consider that when the test ended the battery was not flat but at 82%, so it would have done another 50-60 km. So in total it would have been 250-260 km

The manufacturer says that my scooter weighs 19 kg and has a range of 65 km, but in reality it weighs 21 kg and does a maximum of 35 km.

If your scooter doesn't fit the datasheet, you have an opportunity of warranty return (Note that a battery has a limited number of cycles and will degrade). Also one could add a ballast and turn on additional electric devices. So 2nd Twizy proves nothing.

@@ooligo4 Eng. Marzocchi has guaranteed and certified everything. If we don't trust an independent, who can we trust? I'm not Saint Thomas

What? He is owner of Twizy. And he is the Rossi's team member. To prevent the conflict of interests , the Renault factory person must be involved. Rossi told that to overcome the forbidding of charge in motion, he contacted the factory. So where were the Renault developers? According to patent law, Rossi should have obtained permission anyway. Where is the photo of the factory permission ? (Note that Twizy Manual suggests it can charge the battery in motion according the paragraph "Power recovery. When driving, if you lift your foot off the accelerator pedal, the motor generates electrical current during deceleration, and this energy is used to recharge the traction battery.".)

​@@ooligo4he is not a Rossi employee, anyway that's enough, if you don't believe it wait for more tests