It is a war scenario prepared for entertainment purposes. Not intended to be realistic. Musics: 1) As Above, So Below - Savfk 2) Triumph - Johan Söderqvist 3) Avanti Savoia - Johan Söderqvist 4) Second Coming - Kevin MacLeod
@@idk-cj8mn and what about gdp, technology, and type of equipment? A large number of troops don’t help nowadays, you need actual training and technology + the will to fight.
@@kocaka69 Yes, the problem is for the slavic countries that the USA has 58times as much money as them and that the USA spends a shit ton of money on the military
No. The EU, despite it's division, is a very formidable force combined. The US would not be able to step a foot on a single member states' soil. If the US struggled in Afghanistan against less technologically developed opponents, how on Earth do you expect it to lay a finger on an entire continent? The most unrealistic and sh*t video this pathetic excuse of a channel has made so far. It's clearly US biased, how the hell did French nuclear bombs get ''intercepted'' but the US struck every target it desired?
No. The EU, despite it's division, is a very formidable force combined. The US would not be able to step a foot on a single member states' soil. If the US struggled in Afghanistan against less technologically developed opponents, how on Earth do you expect it to lay a finger on an entire continent? The most unrealistic and sh*t video this pathetic excuse of a channel has made so far. It's clearly US biased, how the hell did French nuclear bombs get ''intercepted'' but the US struck every target it desired?
Idea: Redo Historic Wars Like The Romans V.s Persians or if you don’t prefer that, you can make a 2nd American Civil War. Anyways keep up the good work and videos, I really like how you’ve made a political backstory for the video.
Меня всегда интересовало, что было бы если европейский союз объеденился в одну страну. Сколько было бы ядерных бомб у Европы, какая была бы численность армии. Но узнать об этом я к сожалению не могу.
First? what first? they didn't use nuke first. First there was a naval war, then air, then land, and then all at once. Also, nowadays, more importance is given to technology than the number of soldiers!
for people that don't understand why the eu lost, no mather if they had more assets: The EU Is made of different countries with each different weapons and systems making it harder for them to work together.
No. The EU, despite it's division, is a very formidable force combined. The US would not be able to step a foot on a single member states' soil. If the US struggled in Afghanistan against less technologically developed opponents, how on Earth do you expect it to lay a finger on an entire continent? The most unrealistic and sh*t video this pathetic excuse of a channel has made so far. It's clearly US biased, how the hell did French nuclear bombs get ''intercepted'' but the US struck every target it desired?
The tanks maybe, the air craft carriers maybe not. Then again, us military budget, it raised to ww2 levels, can go up to 10-12 trillion dollars. TRILLIONS. America had the greatest military with an annual 800 billion dollar military budget. Now look at over 10 times that.
They can. France only had 290, Americas could easily overwhelm them with various interceptors. If it was Russia, launching 5000, that would be a completely diffferent story. But 290 is very manageable.
@@TheU.S. The US wouldn't even exist without Europe and was literally a puppet for most of its history. Only became Independent thanks to french and Spanish support. So your point is?