Тёмный

The Eucharist (Aquinas 101) 

The Thomistic Institute
Подписаться 125 тыс.
Просмотров 39 тыс.
50% 1

⭐️ Donate $5 to help keep these videos FREE for everyone!
Pay it forward for the next viewer: go.thomisticinstitute.org/don...
"My flesh is food indeed, and my blood is drinking indeed. He who eats my flesh and drinks my blood abides in me and I in him." (John 6)
From the Lord’s supernatural sustenance, we can keep on our spiritual feet and continue with the hard earthly journey toward heaven. The Eucharist unites us with Christ's sacrificial love and obedience, and enables us to offer the spiritual sacrifice of our physical lives, to take up our crosses daily, and to serve our neighbors daily.
The Eucharist (Aquinas 101) - Fr. Dominic Langevin, O.P.
For readings, podcasts, and more videos like this, go to www.Aquinas101.com. While you’re there, be sure to sign up for one of our free video courses on Aquinas. And don’t forget to like and share with your friends, because it matters what you think!
Subscribe to our channel here:
ru-vid.com...
--
Aquinas 101 is a project of the Thomistic Institute that seeks to promote Catholic truth through short, engaging video lessons. You can browse earlier videos at your own pace or enroll in one of our Aquinas 101 email courses on St. Thomas Aquinas and his masterwork, the Summa Theologiae. In these courses, you'll learn from expert scientists, philosophers, and theologians-including Dominican friars from the Province of St. Joseph.
Enroll in Aquinas 101 to receive the latest videos, readings, and podcasts in your email inbox each Tuesday morning.
Sign up here: aquinas101.thomisticinstitute...
Help us film Aquinas 101!
Donate here: go.thomisticinstitute.org/don...
Want to represent the Thomistic Institute on your campus? Check out our online store!
Explore here: go.thomisticinstitute.org/sto...
Stay connected on social media:
/ thomisticinstitute
/ thomisticinstitute
/ thomisticinst
Visit us at: thomisticinstitute.org/
#Aquinas101 #ThomisticInstitute #ThomasAquinas #Catholic

Опубликовано:

 

27 сен 2020

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 87   
@aaronclark2599
@aaronclark2599 2 года назад
"Eternal Father i offer you the Body and Blood, Soul and Divinity of Your dearly beloved Son our Lord Jesus Christ in atonement for our sins and those of the whole world."
@ar1stippus739
@ar1stippus739 3 года назад
I have just recently started RCIA after being on the fence for 8 years. Thomas Aquinas was a huge inspiration for me with his work on synthesizing faith and reason both as a political scientist and as a person. I'm so glad I found a channel dedicated to one of my favorite thinkers in history
@gamers7800
@gamers7800 3 года назад
May Our Lord and his most holy mother keep you strong in your search for the truth, God bless.
@user-ji2on8eg3l
@user-ji2on8eg3l Год назад
Jesus & Mary I love you. Save souls.
@ClareTusiime
@ClareTusiime 4 дня назад
JESUS IN THE EUCHARIST OUR PARADISE ON EARTH
@PInk77W1
@PInk77W1 2 года назад
“If Jesus could’ve gave us a better gift than the Eucharist, he would have.” St John Vianney
@MarthaMoran28
@MarthaMoran28 3 года назад
Thank you for this beautiful video about the Holy Sacrament of the Eucharist. God Bless you!
@ThomisticInstitute
@ThomisticInstitute 3 года назад
Thank you, God bless!
@MarthaMoran28
@MarthaMoran28 3 года назад
@@ThomisticInstitute Amen!
@joshuamagawa9872
@joshuamagawa9872 3 года назад
Thank you Fr. Dominic, this is an amazing video to me. I everyday strive to believe in the real presence of Christ in the "sacrament".
@aaronargottelopez3488
@aaronargottelopez3488 2 месяца назад
Thanks!
@tomiwaters7367
@tomiwaters7367 3 года назад
Super helpful! Thank you!
@maryjohnstone4777
@maryjohnstone4777 3 года назад
Thanks again for handing us on your great depth of what seems your endless knowledge on so many answers on those important Questions of life! So valuable to have an increased awareness of same!
@maryjohnstone4777
@maryjohnstone4777 3 года назад
A lovely n special explanatory video on such a special talk ! Thanks Fr .
@maryjohnstone4777
@maryjohnstone4777 3 года назад
A very special video ; thanks for sharing such a beautiful talk!
@kristindreko3194
@kristindreko3194 Год назад
Thank you Aquinas 101, may God bless you!
@dennisecantillo5579
@dennisecantillo5579 2 года назад
Thanks Aquinas 101 for this video! That is why it is important that every Catholic unite to support (through prayer and donation) the Eucharistic Miracles Movie, whose main goal is to bring people to realize the importance of the Real Presence of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the Eucharist and to continue the work that Blessed Carlo Acutis began. Adveniat Regnum Tuum Eucharisticum!
@tomgreene2282
@tomgreene2282 3 года назад
"Sacramental and substantial presence" Much meaning in this phrase. Christ makes it for us what He wants it to be.
@geraldmoyo6392
@geraldmoyo6392 3 года назад
Thank you for the video Father. Would you please make another one explaining the devotion to the Eucharist
@JacksonD0716
@JacksonD0716 Год назад
Great video!
@emberdrops3892
@emberdrops3892 Год назад
Amazing video! You explained everything so easily understandable and from a neutral standpoint. I still have questions though: - For once, yes, Christ _gave_ himself away as the bread. How can we be sure that he still does that today? - And more importantly, from what I have heard, _the priest_ is the one concecrating the bread and wine. How can any human have the authority to speak or even act in the role of Christ?
@juliehillebrand3920
@juliehillebrand3920 2 месяца назад
I posted earlier that the EUCHARIST IS AB positive and mistakenly said that AB POSITIVE IS THE UNIVERSAL DONOR. ACTUALLY IT IS THE UNIVERSAL RECIPIENT. WE ARE JOINING TO CHRIST AS HE CAN ACCEPT ALL OF US.
@tonyornelas9374
@tonyornelas9374 Год назад
Was it a metaphor when Jesus told the woman at the well whoever drinks the water I give will never thirst?
@GuillermoSanchez-fu2pu
@GuillermoSanchez-fu2pu 10 месяцев назад
Here is a question. What about people with gluten intolerance? Can the eucharist be gluten free? Would it still be holy? I ask for myself i get arthritis symptoms from gluten
@angelahull9064
@angelahull9064 3 месяца назад
There is a low gluten option but it is not entirely gluten free. Receiving our Lord in the species of wine from a cup not used by congregants who receive the usual species of bread may be the safest option. One drop of Our Lord's Blood still contains the whole of His body, blood, soul, and divinity.
@strugglingathome
@strugglingathome 3 года назад
Friendship is great and all in the Eucharist but why no mention of deification?
@carlosm_bg
@carlosm_bg 3 года назад
I think maybe because deification has more to do with Grace in general and not just the Eucharist. And also because deification as a word is not exactly in the jargon of St. Thomas Aquinas (though what the concept means is present in the Summa and in this video).
@beast5250
@beast5250 3 года назад
I need some help. I was discussing with a Protestant pastor about the Eucharist and he stated that it is spiritually His body and blood but it does not physically become that. He also made the point that the Church only believed the spiritual transformation until it called a council to change it's doctrine. I brought up John 6 and he made the point that because Christ stated that it's the spirit that gives life, the flesh is of no avail, Christ's words were spiritual and he did not mean it literally.
@daivon7453
@daivon7453 3 года назад
I hope this helps! "He also made the point that the Church only believed the spiritual transformation until it called a council to change it's doctrine." I wonder at what period of the Church. 🤔 "We do not consume the eucharistic bread and wine as if it were ordinary food and drink, for we have been taught that as Jesus Christ our Savior became a man of flesh and blood by the power of the Word of God, so also the food that our flesh and blood assimilates for its nourishment becomes the flesh and blood of the incarnate Jesus by the power of his own words contained in the prayer of thanksgiving." - Justin Martyr, roughly 155 A.D (roughly 122 years after the death of the Lord Jesus Christ.)
@jaroldfranco970
@jaroldfranco970 3 года назад
You can also ask: if that is only spiritual, why did his audience considered it as a hard saying? Then at the end why do the other disciples still left Him?
@verenice2656
@verenice2656 3 года назад
So Christ meant to say his flesh is of no avail??? 🤔 Surely not.
@renecordero1242
@renecordero1242 3 года назад
If you read the early Christian writers, the Fathers of the Church, you find that they believed in the real (physical) presence of Christ in the Eucharist.
@masterchief8179
@masterchief8179 3 года назад
The anger and despise on the Most Blessed Sacrament is obviously abnormal. Keep searching for Jesus, my friend. Jesus gives his life bodily so as to give it spiritually to us. But as He is the God incarnate, the understanding of the real presence must not betray the mystery of Incarnation. The passage you mentioned was not a disposal of the flesh (as in some kind of depreciation, what would be strongly contradictory and against the context), but an affirmation that the changing of substance (of the species) of bread and wine is accessible to us only through faith and and not through the perception of our bodily senses. St Thomas Aquinas “Adoro te Devote” Eucharistic hymn sings it explicitly (‘Visus, tactus, gustus in te fallitur/ Sed auditu solo tuto creditur’: _”Sight, touch, taste are all deceived in their judgment of you/ But hearing suffices firmly to believe”_ ). The Pastor is just getting it all wrong, my friend. In the strength of the Holy Spirit, whenever consecrated bread was said to be the signal of the Presence in the Old Testament in a somewhat scattered way, the New Covenant fulfills it in the Eucharist, the True Bread of Life, the True Bread from heaven: Jesus, by delivering his own earthly life to the Father for our sins, gave his body and blood (signals of life in the Old Testaments) so that we can partake in the communion with Him in the deepest sense. Terminating all inefficacious sacrifice of Jewish Law, Jesus took all sacrifices into his own body and made it the only perfect one (Hebrew 7, 27), abolishing sacrificialism. When Jesus preached about the Eucharist in the Cafarnaum synagogue (John 6, 22-66), the emphasis that there he did not speak symbolically about His body and His blood was a cause for striking scandals; here, by the way, it is the ONLY passage documented in the Sacred Scriptures in which discipleship people abandoned him for simply not accepting the preaching (John 6, 66), such is the loathing that aroused when the communicated Eucharistic message to be held on the Last Supper. In emblematic preaching, he proclaimed to the faithful that everyone who eats His flesh and drinks His blood “has eternal life” (John 6, 54). It would be simple to assume that the language proposed a symbolic use for flesh and blood, with the note that such a thesis would not cause the scandal and would already bequeath, without trauma, an “offer of mental doctrinal confort” accessible to all. In John 3, 3-15, when Nicodemus asked how could one be born again returning to mother’s womb, Jesus of course showed that the language was symbolic, and to be born again of WATER and SPIRIT was a clear reference of sacramental baptism. In three chapters later, symbolic language was not the case: Jesus goes on to explain it even more explicitly. His flesh is, in fact, truly eaten, and His blood, truly drunk, as real food and drink (John 6, 55). This was said all in context *four times in an increasing order of clarity*. Three chapters earlier the metaphorical language was explained on being born again. Here Our Lord is not only stick to denotative language, but even more clarifying and insistent. Realize that the Scriptures bring passages with vehement condemnation for the Jews to eat the flesh by sipping their blood (Gen 9: 2-4); therefore, it would certainly be known to Jesus that the disciples would assimilate the preaching to a blasphemous prescription about something banned, or even to the doctrinal defense of a rude anthropophagy. Why did Jesus, who knew all the Scriptural writings, being the One to whom the Scriptures came to testify (John 5, 39), did not give them a sweet warm clarification? The Bible was unquestionable here: Jesus simply knew Truth would scandalize his hearers (John 6, 61) and beforehand he knew those who would not BELIEVE (John 6, 64), instituting the Most Blessed Sacrament through which he announced His real presence, and by this way, differentiates the believers, those who eat his flesh and drink his blood - that is, the men in whom Christ remains, and thus remain in Christ, obtaining eternal life (John 6, 54.56) -, from the unbelievers (John 6, 53). Disposing of this sanctifying grace, people simply puts their souls to risk. Actually, if anyone with mortal sin eats the body and blood of the Lord, that not only means an unfruitful disposition to receive the Most Blessed Sacrament, but a grave sacrilege: _“So then, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord”_ (1 Corinthians 11, 27). This can only be explained by the real and substantive presence in those strict physical elements of the Sacred Body of Christ, despite the preserved material accidents, because no one can be condemned of vilipending boiled wheat or fermented grape juice. Not only this, but a serious consciousness in faith is demanded: _“Everyone ought to examine themselves before they eat of the bread and drink from the cup. _*_For those who eat and drink without discerning the body of Christ eat and drink judgment on themselves”_* . Greetings from 🇧🇷 Brazil.
@BabuThomas-by9ru
@BabuThomas-by9ru Год назад
Bishaporu halpar job tharamo
@jessebryant9233
@jessebryant9233 9 месяцев назад
So how do you know that the object you're worshiping is actually Jesus? I mean, if you were given a bag full of 'em and only one had been blessed... I think there is a reason why the Jews were told not to make any object that represented Jesus, while it seems like the prohibition on drinking blood is a bit of a no-brainer... Why would Christ command that we do 2 things that were forbidden in the Old Testament, when he came to fulfill the law, not change it?
@WellFedSheep
@WellFedSheep Год назад
Why would you need to eat a piece of God's body when you are in fact already part of his body. Ephesians 5:30 KJV For we are members of his body, of his flesh, and of his bones.
@datboi6066
@datboi6066 9 месяцев назад
that was written to bishops of a church who participate in the eucharist...Paul hast a verse mentioning how to properly eat the body and flesh of jesus in the same letter
@WellFedSheep
@WellFedSheep 9 месяцев назад
@@datboi6066 Where? Communion is mentioned in 1 Corinthians but I don't see it in Ephesians.
@angelahull9064
@angelahull9064 3 месяца назад
Basic Christology. The Second Person of the Holy Trinity assumed our human nature in the undivided hypostatic. What cannot be assumed cannot be saved. In turn, Jesus offers us participation into His divinity by our consumption of His body, blood, soul, and Divinity. Not only we become united with the other members of the Body of Christ, but we are being deified to share in His divine life. Not as new gods, but in our union with Him.
@angelahull9064
@angelahull9064 3 месяца назад
*hypostatic union
@budjeansonne4482
@budjeansonne4482 3 месяца назад
"True but sacramental substantial presence" ...what the hell does that mean? This is more roman catholic psychobabble.
@bobbyrice2858
@bobbyrice2858 Год назад
Transubstantiation is a doctrine of the Roman Catholic Church. The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines this doctrine in section 1376: "The Council of Trent summarizes the Catholic faith by declaring: ‘Because Christ our Redeemer said that it was truly his body that he was offering under the species of bread, it has always been the conviction of the Church of God, and this holy Council now declares again, that by the consecration of the bread and wine there takes place a change of the whole substance of the bread into the substance of the body of Christ our Lord and of the whole substance of the wine into the substance of his blood. This change the holy Catholic Church has fittingly and properly called transubstantiation.’" In other words, the Roman Catholic Church teaches that once an ordained priest blesses the bread of the Lord’s Supper, it is transformed into the actual flesh of Christ (though it retains the appearance, odor, and taste of bread); and when he blesses the wine, it is transformed into the actual blood of Christ (though it retains the appearance, odor, and taste of wine). Is such a concept biblical? There are some Scriptures that, if interpreted strictly literally, would lead to the “real presence” of Christ in the bread and wine. Examples are John 6:32-58; Matthew 26:26; Luke 22:17-23; and 1 Corinthians 11:24-25. The passage pointed to most frequently is John 6:32-58 and especially verses 53-57, “Jesus said to them, ‘I tell you the truth, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink His blood, you have no life in you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life … For my flesh is real food and my blood is real drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me, and I in him … so the one who feeds on me will live because of me.’” Roman Catholics interpret this passage literally and apply its message to the Lord’s Supper, which they title the “Eucharist” or “Mass.” Those who reject the idea of transubstantiation interpret Jesus’ words in John 6:53-57 figuratively or symbolically. How can we know which interpretation is correct? Thankfully, Jesus made it exceedingly obvious what He meant. John 6:63 declares, “The Spirit gives life; the flesh counts for nothing. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and they are life.” Jesus specifically stated that His words are “spirit.” Jesus was using physical concepts, eating and drinking, to teach spiritual truth. Just as consuming physical food and drink sustains our physical bodies, so are our spiritual lives saved and built up by spiritually receiving Him, by grace through faith. Eating Jesus’ flesh and drinking His blood are symbols of fully and completely receiving Him in our lives. The Scriptures declare that the Lord’s Supper is a memorial to the body and blood of Christ (Luke 22:19; 1 Corinthians 11:24-25), not the actual consumption of His physical body and blood. When Jesus was speaking in John chapter 6, Jesus had not yet had the Last Supper with His disciples, in which He instituted the Lord’s Supper. To read the Lord’s Supper / Christian Communion back into John chapter 6 is unwarranted. For a more complete discussion of these issues, please read our article on the Holy Eucharist. The most serious reason transubstantiation should be rejected is that it is viewed by the Roman Catholic Church as a "re-sacrifice" of Jesus Christ for our sins, or as a “re-offering / re-presentation” of His sacrifice. This is directly in contradiction to what Scripture says, that Jesus died "once for all" and does not need to be sacrificed again (Hebrews 10:10; 1 Peter 3:18). Hebrews 7:27 declares, "Unlike the other high priests, He (Jesus) does not need to offer sacrifices day after day, first for his own sins, and then for the sins of the people. He sacrificed for their sins ONCE for all when He offered Himself."
@kdmdlo
@kdmdlo 9 месяцев назад
Um, you don't understand Catholic theology. We do not re-sacrifice the Lord. The Mass is a participation in the one sacrifice of Christ at Calvary. This is the same as on Passover, when Jews answer the question, "why do we eat bitter herbs and unleavened bread?" The response is (to this day): "It is for what God did for me, as He led me out of Egypt." (I'm paraphrasing the Q&A). Passover is a participation of the saving act of the exodus. Mass - the new passover - is a participation in the one sacrifice of Christ. We don't re-sacrifice Christ.
@bobbyrice2858
@bobbyrice2858 9 месяцев назад
@@kdmdlo I know Catholicism. I know Catholicism because I know my Lord and Savior. This is how I know that the original church has fallen into error. I read, discern and pay attention to the only source of God’s word. The entire letter of Hebrews slaps Rome in the face.
@kdmdlo
@kdmdlo 9 месяцев назад
@@bobbyrice2858 Well, you're certainly entitled to an opinion ... but not entitled to different facts. You asserted that The Church "re-sacrifices" ... and that is simply not true. But you bring up an interesting point. You say that "I read and pay attention ..." but how do you know that YOUR interpretation is correct? By what divine authority are you spared from interpretation errors? You claim to know - but couldn't you be wrong?
@bobbyrice2858
@bobbyrice2858 9 месяцев назад
@@kdmdlo you ask how i know my interpretation is correct and which authority says so. Ok, so, my one true authority over me is Christ. Hes my high priest, mediator and savior. The Gospel is his authority. As a believer in Jesus, the holy spirit resides within me, guiding me, chastising me and molding me. The word of God is the final and ONLY authority i adhere to. My indwelt spirit confirms the word of Hod (scripture) by means of conviction. I read contextually vs dogmatic inflation of snippet verses in scripture lime Rome does with John 6, 1 cor 6, Rev 12 and so on. Scriptures word is revealed to me by the holy spirit. Its only possible by the spirit. Romans 8:9 ESV You, however, are not in the flesh but in the Spirit, if in fact the Spirit of God dwells in you. Anyone who does not have the Spirit of Christ does not belong to him. If i were an unbeliever then my mind would be set on the flesh as an enemy to God. Romans 8:7 ESV For the mind that is set on the flesh is hostile to God, for it does not submit to God's law; indeed, it cannot. So, in believe and true radical transformed change we believers are ALL gifted the ability to understand scripture. The church is not a organization of authoritative bishops, priests and popes. Gods word speaks against this. Jesus said: Matthew 23:8 ESV But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And Matthew 23:10-11 ESV Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ. [11] The greatest among you shall be your servant. This is Romes problem. Rome unilaterally and consistently rejects the Gospel today for its tradition. Believers are no linger blind to the word of God. Paul, speaking of unbelievers said: “the god of this world has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, to keep them from seeing the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.” So, in summery, if you made it this far lol ;) ….true salvation is a spirit change, we leave the desires of the flesh and exist in the convicted stare of the spirit in Christ. In christ we possess the supernatural ability to be taught by the holy spirit. Church leadership is ONLY for guiding the masses in sanctification by the word of God. The Word of God is in only one place. The TORAH and its echo, the NT gospel which ALL WERE in circulation ling before Rome. The Torah 2000 years prior and the NT gospel and letters before 70AD. IF you read the TORAH you will exit Rome if your heart is set on Christ vs his “church”. The true church are the believers in Christ. Not a formal organizational presence. Thats why the pillar and foundation is the masses of believers together as the body (plural/symbolic) OF( belonging) Christ. We as the Body promote THE TRUTH which is scripture. the truth is scripture, not the church.
@bobbyrice2858
@bobbyrice2858 9 месяцев назад
@@kdmdlo 1 Corinthians 2:14-16 ESV The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned. [15] The spiritual person judges all things, but is himself to be judged by no one. [16] "For who has understood the mind of the Lord so as to instruct him?" But we have the mind of Christ. Notice no mention of church interpretive necessity. You wont find a single passage saying different. Rome had to invent such a notion.
@JesusIsLord-
@JesusIsLord- Год назад
Let us see whether there is 'ANY' Truth whatsoever in what the gentleman says. At 3:08 the gentleman states 'of the bread and wine, we receive the substantial presence of Christ's Body and Blood, and therefore everything connected now with Christ's Body and Blood, namely his Soul and Divinity.' In RC teaching the wafer becomes Jesus who can see, talk and listen. 1. Now please look at 1 Corinthians 11:26. 'For as often as you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord’s death 'TILL HE COMES'! The 'believers' are asked to share bread in 'remembrance' UNTIL Jesus comes for judgement again. Does that mean He comes again and again or once only? 2. Hebrews 9:28 describe the second coming of Jesus: 'So Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, WILL APPAER "A" SECOND TIME... Jesus is going to come just ONCE again to judge. According to the RC teachings Jesus is a 'frequent flyer' to altars. However God of the Bible disagrees with RC teachings: Jesus will ONLY come again ONCE to judge! Can you now see the Roman Catholicism contradicts God of the Bible? There is NO salvation in the Roman Catholicism. Please repent and turn to Jesus. Please don't end up in the pit. Much love and blessings to you all. www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p2s2c1a3.htm
@kdmdlo
@kdmdlo 9 месяцев назад
I love the Church He founded ... the Holy Roman Catholic Church. Pax Christi!
@JesusIsLord-
@JesusIsLord- 9 месяцев назад
People can love whatever they want. God does not love the Roman Catholic church that's why He calls it foolish church and a whore in the book of Revelation! @@kdmdlo
@annekelly9375
@annekelly9375 4 месяца назад
Whare in the Holy Bible do u find the Word Eucharist ,. Is this not a man made word a white disc of bread , is not bread and wine ,. Jesus was sitting at a table at his last Supper , when he said take bread , it represcents my body , take this fruit of the vine it represcents my blood ,, ., Jesus never ever said ,.turn this white disc of bread , into my actual body and blood ,.if all that u say , would be true ,Then there would be instant Healthy bodies . Deliverance straight away ,. Ye are so delusional ,. Jesus said repent and be baptized ,.
@troyhayder6986
@troyhayder6986 3 года назад
How much of the eucharist is of nutritional value... Let's see.. Its pretty much carbs... Which are slow release energy... So that means... It mostly ends up in the toilet...
@GrislyAtoms12
@GrislyAtoms12 2 года назад
You need to study biochemistry. You got everything wrong except the part about it being carbs. And even that is wrong from a spiritual perspective.
@troyhayder6986
@troyhayder6986 2 года назад
@@GrislyAtoms12 you shit it into the toilet...you shit..jesus..i mean..christ..
@troyhayder6986
@troyhayder6986 2 года назад
@@GrislyAtoms12 do sheep eat shepherds??? Revelations on the john has acurrately predicted the holey poo feces will come true...
@troyhayder6986
@troyhayder6986 2 года назад
@@GrislyAtoms12 dont forget to wipe and admire...jesus...
@troyhayder6986
@troyhayder6986 2 года назад
@@GrislyAtoms12 jesus turned bread..into a feast... I can out miracle jesus... I can turn christ into shit... Christ=r,c,shit Rc(phonetic) shit Arse shit... Tada!!! So can you... And dont forget to wipe....
Далее
Transubstantiation (Aquinas 101)
8:13
Просмотров 73 тыс.
heavy boot #tiktok
00:16
Просмотров 626 тыс.
Just try to use a cool gadget 😍
00:33
Просмотров 40 млн
Angels and Demons (Aquinas 101)
11:25
Просмотров 152 тыс.
Creation Isn't What You Think It Is! (Aquinas 101)
8:33
Holy Eucharist ~ Fr Ripperger
24:18
Просмотров 60 тыс.
An Inside Look - The Dominican House of Studies
10:10
Where Does Virtue Come From? (Aquinas 101)
9:10
Просмотров 47 тыс.
The Sacrifice of the Mass (Aquinas 101)
7:14
Просмотров 35 тыс.
The Persons of the Trinity (Aquinas 101)
9:37
Просмотров 93 тыс.