The Europeans of Bronze Age China 

Stirrup was not invented till 1700-1800 years ago, and Chinese bowmen of 5000 could confront a Hun cavalry army of 100,000, and it is because the Huns did not have stirrups. In the 2nd century China, the ancient Tibetao-Burmans invaded the Yellow River area by 10,000 cavalry. 200,000 Chinese soldiers from counties in the area were asked to pool money to buy 10,000 horses, and then 190,000 soldiers dismissed, and the rest 10,000 cavalrymen chased the 10,000 barbarians back to the area of the Yellow River origin. No stirrups at the time. But the Huns and Avars had the stirrups to invade into Europe.

What archeological evidence is there for castration? It only affects soft tissues which disappear.

@@user-gn2xq9dp9j Useless babble.

Not entirely accurate; scythian saddles had bolsters that acted in the same fashion as stirrups.

​@@VX-VAMAEBI78N1-MR-12 This could be just another myth. European related military history attributed to the Avars for first using stirrups. Last time I wrote the Huns and Avars took the stirrup there. I now take back the Huns' part. Stirrup was not particularly talked about in China. The sudden change of warfare could be seen in adoption of cavalry uniforms in the 4th to 3rd centuries Before Christ, which did not replace the thousand-year-old chariots' warfare, continuous usage of chariots in the campaigns into Mongolia and Siberia in the 1st century, abandoning of chariots' warfare in the mid-3rd century, with like dismissing 190,000 soldiers to get 10,000 soldiers ride on horses to chase the Qiang cavalry marauders who did not likely possessed the modern-sense stirrups, sudden fighting capability of the Xianbei cavalry in the 4th century, with hundreds of Xianbei daring tens of thousands of Huns. My guess is stirrups were invented about the time of the 1st part of the 4th century. Then the Avars took it to the west.

Agree!

I agree completely. Would love to see it done by Kevin.

I'd like to see this too. Especially the origins. Ancient Buddhist history and mythology seem impenetrable to me

What’s wild is a lot of these early Buddhist cultures spoke proto indo European family languages, so it would be really Interesting to see how these groups overlap and like cross cultural ideas, I suspect Silk Road and other variables at play , anyway def would be cool 😎 👍

Yes, that would be very interesting!

Aryan/Kuragni/Yamnaya Expansion is the word you're looking for

LMAO i was thinking that might be a good defence, there goes that idea

Hi, what is your ethnicity?

@@auraledgereal white Same as kalash But they are more beautiful👍💯😀

Then you should look into Ancient North Eurasian ANE, the progenitors. Also not European and defintely not white.

Thank you! Will do!

I said same Best video I've ever seen on Afanasievo culture Gets little mention

I told the yotutuber: You appear to put new wine in old wine cup. Edward Vajda - Tlingit and the Dene-Yeniseian Hypothesis. Linguistically, Chinese was to do with this umbrella. Tibeto-Burmans split from Chinese 5000-9000 years ago but shared 80-90% cognates, all with the 'quan' cognate for dogs. This was before any Tocharian migration to the Tarim. Genetically, Chinese were related to the Fins who lived in southeastern Inner Mongolia before migration to the west. Pottery and metallurgy, you want to study a Russian Olga Gorodetskaya's bronze studies of excavated bronze in the Yangtze, much older than the Shang bronze. And you want to study Needham to know potteries were invented 15000 years ago, and only in China you had the wind turbine to generate the high temperature. Metallurgy, the west did not know how to melt the ore or casting other than hammering. Horse and chariot, the west was 1000 years late in harnessing, and the Sumerian harnessing would choke a horse at the neck when fast running. There is no way for a R1B gene to carry high tech to China. Edward Vajda would give you the dates by millenniums for the interactions of people, and you could come to understand why Avars were N and Q genes, Fins and Central Asian Turks. The Central Asia R1a people were pushed out by the Turks. In ancient Chinese, we had the mixed genes of the Fins and Turks, but not Indo-Europeans R1a, not to mention your R1b.

My output isn't high as I put a lot into research and putting things together in a decent way. I had a few videos bomb so it may have messed with the algorithm.

@@FortressofLugh I don't always agree with your overtures, but the information is always really high quality. Keep it up, Mr. McLean.

via Sanskrit or Avestan.

I think it came from Indo Iranian word magi. If i'm not wrong, " Magis " were priests of The Medians.

That's POSSIBLE, but evidence points to an entry TOO EARLY for that. That's what I recall.

Necessity is the mother of invention.

Are not weapons lethal devices by definition?

Anything can be lethal, fists -> tools -> weapons of war

The equalizer: bronze age Bro takes you out with cow shit Allusions to the first mk ultra magaculture yes

You'd be surprised what a blacksmith can figure out ;)

Chinese: 轱辘 (Pronunciation: gulu)

both gulu and gulun are meant similar idea. Gulu means something cylindrical like a tree trunk which can roll . Gulun means wheel to turn.

馬（MA) also can be pronounced as (MU) which can be pronounced (WU) which means military or marchall. Horse was named MA for drawing chariot.

@@MasonMWang Yes, in Tagalog (Gulong) could also mean "roll".

😂 if you could read what they said about the enemies to the west of them you wouldn't. But you can't. So....here we are. For the record, they human sacrified those western enemies. So...enjoy that thought.

Terrible translation. It means heavenly father, and its one of many names.

Folk therapy in rural areas of China today still use honey, likewise, in Central Asia (for example Kyrgrzstan.)

Poland also. The word for honey is (Miód) and it's used in home medicine to treat a cold , you add chopped onion to honey and let the onion juice mix with the honey for about a day

Yes, absolutely!

@@FortressofLugh you’re awesome Sir!

Lots of "Aryans" in the chat claiming many things.

Yeah, you don’t use “R-Haplogroup peoples” because that’s completely meaningless babble. The origin of individuals in question is Europe. You don’t like that because it implies Europeans achieved highly even in prehistory.

I always thought Europe was west of the Ural Mountains

@@ashleigh3021 Prehistoric Europeans built megaliths, developed tin mining and smelting, set up trade networks over thousands of miles, and domesticated thousands of species. I don't mean to object to their achievement. But some of the language in this video seems to use "European" in a murky way. If the Indo-European speakers of the Tarim were "European," then are their descendants (Paxtuns, Yaghnovs, and Tadziks) also? And if Indo-European language/culture/ancestry is what makes a people "European," then are Hungarians, Finns, and Basques not Europeans?

@@olcooksy6132 He didn't say that Indo-European ancestry is what makes someone European, just that the Indo-Europeans were originally European.

I love to fart in my hand and bring it up to take a good whiff

The “original” people - the yamnaya - comes from the steppes between Europe and Asia - en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yamnaya_culture

Early from Persia, during the Empire period, Alexander established 8 city-states in Afghanistan

In mongolian mori means horse.

Moor also means dark-skinned or swarthy and or possibly a jewish association.

Most of the people making up theories can't read Chinese. So they don't realize they are trying to claim groups with unfortunate fates, while trying to connect with Chinese. The funny thing is those groups don't have anything to do with white people. Simplified we are talking about Western steppe herders which are descended from Eastern. It's well established the progenitors is the Ancient North Eurasian group. Ie. Tianyuan man.

"Sanskrit" sounds like "Truescript" to modern scandis, and Siddhartha Gautama at first glance seems like an obvious eastern-gothic form of "Sigurdr Gautamadr" [Sigfried Gothman]

Nah. They Dominion were from modern day Finland to Western Kazakhstan and Indo Europeans/ Aryans were the first people and their influence over the world is the greatest not some finno ugric or turk tribes.

@@bertrecht913Nowdays is just a historical moment. It doesn't matter what we call ourselves. Nations religions come and go, but people stay on same place. Everything else is just a mirage

@@laszloerdesz3884 Yeah sure but it matters more than you think!

Interesting, why is that?

Right. They’re just European.

cais-soas.com/CAIS/History/Post-Sasanian/pirooz.htm

Indo-European is something of a misnomer, which was adopted to replace a different term after WW2 for political reasons.

​@@peterj9351 Not politically concerned... But do you mean aryans? Is it actually inappropriate to utter?

@@KingoftheJianglInd European language family includes from S Asia, parts of Mid E, parts of Caucasus, most of Europe,parts of N America &’S America.

Aryans as in Central Asian steppes. As in steppe herders that all stem from Ancient North Eurasian (ANE). As for vedic and buddhists Vedic literature therefore considered the populations of Greater Magadha as existing outside of the limits of Āryāvarta, with the Manusmṛiti grouping the Vaidehas, Māgadhīs, Licchavikas, and Mallakas, who were the neighbours of the Shakyas, as being "non-Aryan"

lolol

車 chē is the character for vehicle/chariot he describes at 15:27.

@@olcooksy6132 like in "chew chew-train" ??

@@SchinkenDerHoffnungno. It’s closer to “cher”. Why don’t you just look it up?

@@SchinkenDerHoffnung It just means vehicle basically and you slap on other words for it to like add the character for fire 火车 means train. Nowadays 车 means car for most people.

@@SchinkenDerHoffnung Also to clarify but 车 is the simplified form used

It has nothing to do with white people. Western steppe herders were descended from Eastern. Ancient North Eurasian (ANE) are the progenitors to what you are pretending has anything to do with you.