The Experiment that Disproved Reality 

If a tree falls in the woods and there is nobody to witness it, it does not make a sound, due to power-saving functions of the simulation. If the area is not being used by players (humans), the area does not exist except in a very toned down manner for power-saving reasons. One a player gets close enough, the area is loaded and whatever changes should have happened during the time it was unloaded get performed so it is up to date.

Probably one of the most mind bending, and mentally stimulating bathroom sessions I've ever had.

Hey keystone, glad to see a new posting. Interesting stuff!

I've been purposefully avoiding this topic because it's so hard to explain, but you nailed it! Thanks for the shoutout, means a lot! Maybe I'll try some experimental stuffs one day.

hey guys! I know it has been a while, I'll try to get some more out soon, but I have been working on something really big (not for a video, but as an experiment/invention) and I have been getting promising results for my first few tests, so I am really excited about it! (if you are curious, it deals with protons ;)

"Printed PCB of your circuit" "PCB board" Yep, managed to get all 3 in there in only two sentences ;)

I remember sitting in a dank classroom being lectured Bell's Theorem. This, like other experiments with light, remind us that classical and quantum mechanics are not unified. It's an exciting time to be a physicist!

Thank you RU-vid Algorithm for finally promoting small cool channels!

I understood everything and nothing at the same time. Is this what Quantum™ science is about?

I really like your style, your content and your personality. I'm glad you're uploading again and getting sponsorships to keep doing what you do.

A Photon checks into a hotel. The Clerk asks if it needs help with its luggage. The Photon says, “No thanks, I’m traveling light.”

The craziest part of reality is how subjective it is. We have hardly scratched the outer echelons of this plane of existence.

You just earned yourself a new subscriber! 😄 Great video!

I still dont understand how everyone talking about this just glosses over the idea that the light going through the filter gets changed as it goes through the filter. I mean that idea PERFECTLY explains what's happening here. he said in the video and it is measurable that all light passing through a polarizing filter is now oriented at the same angle as the filter. We can't prove** that the filter changed the light, but we see that all light on the other side is oriented with the filter. so this would easily be explained by the fact that light within a certain margin of the angle of the polarizing filter would get 'redirected' to match the filter and this would perfectly explain what's why light can pass through the three filters and make a 90 degree turn but not 2 filters to make a 90 degree turn. I mean referencing the 3bl1br video, they say that light at angle 0 when passing through a 22.5 degree filter, 15% gets blocked and 85% is let through, so now we can measure that all light passing through that filter is now polarized at a 22.5degree offset from the initial reference. So it only makes sense that the next filter would behave exactly the same as the first, but with a new reference, thus leading 60% of the total light remaining and at 45 degrees offset from the initial beam reference. Even using entangled photons doesn't disprove this idea because you are only sending the photons through a single filter. thus the % let through matches as if it was only one filter. You need to run this test again but have the entangled light pass through 2 filters. So that PhotonA would pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 and photon B pass through filters 0 and 45; or 0 and 90 independently. IF there was some spooky action at a distance, then you would expect if PhotonA passed through filter 0 and 45 and PhotonB passed through filter 0 and 90 then you should expect to see PhotonB to pass through filters 0 and 90 25% of the time. But i would bet money that PhotonB would pass through at the % perfection of the filter, since after all i doubt any filter is 100% perfect, so lets assume a filter of 99.999%perfection, you would see PhotonB show up 0.00001% of the time.

Wow you put a lot of work into this video! Thanks, this was awesome to see!

It seems that wherever I check on a channel that i haven't watched in a long time and see they haven't posted in a while, they post a video in a few days! That's happened twice this week. Great content as always.

Glad to see another post. Getting over my head, but got most of it. Don't stop. Works as an excellent filter. Wouldn't getting unexpected results on such an experiment imply that there are local hidden variables that we are as yet unaware?

Thank you for providing the links in the description. Very useful resource!

Nice to see mini cody's lab is uploading again 😅

Personal partial epiphany on the rotating polarization situation while watching this (no real educated mathematical base for this, just concept that came into my mind): If the polarization is caused by electrons only being able to vibrate along one axis, maybe they not only just let through photons polarized at a right angle to that axis but when they encounter a photon polarization that is at some angle neither perpendicular nor parallel and photons are quantized, and must be either fully absorbed or not at all, the electrons essentially absorb the parallel component vector of their polarization and re-emit a brand new photon polarized according to the remaining perpendicular component of that photon (or accumulated sum of multiple such photons since quanta are always whole numbers) That new photon is then free to interact with the next filter in a non-parallel, non-perpendicular manner.

I really liked the practical instruments used and the whatever available instruments you got, very cool.

No explosions? *oh wait this is keystone science and not electroboom*-

Your videos are perfect for home experimenting and I plan on building some of your projects!!

Dude i don't how long it takes to get your videos up Extremely descriptive just the way i like it Most importantly your linking papers in the description

Did you edit the video to make it seem like you don't need to breathe, or do you exchange gas through your skin? Gills maybe?

Nice to get a upload from you again! How is the fusor reactor you and cody is working on going?

Thank you for this video. I wish that I had watched it before the Bourbon kicked in. I will have to watch it again. Subscribed.

I like how there's a completely serious 10 minute build up then it jumps to an experiment where you're shooting lasers at a device that looks like a pair of those googly-eyed-glasses with the big -nose, wearing a second pair of goggles for safety. Glad to see you back and making videos again :)

Thank you!!! This is an awesome way to demonstrate such a complicated/ non-intuitive idea.

Thanks, i really needed that headache lol

Close very close, as there is one major element missing in this interesting problem. Rotation. Not only does energy have compression and rarification as taught as waves, alternating dielectric and magnetic fields, it inherently also rotates. The rotation through the substrate causes an interesting result. The light shifts slightly in rotation and is therefor slightly different in rotational angle than before it entered. The middle polarizer does the same which results in the light further shifting which is seen as light passing through the last polarizer. All energy inherently rotates and this is known as the Lamar frequency.

Your so smart and good at getting the information across. Keep making awesome videos!! 😁👍👍

this was a really cool and informative video, cant wait to see future content

So this is where quarternion numbera come into play. Figuring out the vectors that you were talking about in the first half. Interesting that I would learn about those yesterday and then come across this video to really understand what you were talking about.

I have heard of this experiment, extensively, but this is the first time I have actually seen it explained. Even in its abbreviated state, the explanation of what to look for and the processes involved was incredibly done. Great job on this!

I'm starting my A-Level physics course in a few months, couldn't be more excited!

Imagine your eyes could detect all particals, waves and all other spacial phenomenon like gravity instead of just photons.

Thank you for a new video! Instantly clicked. Sadly your videos get fewer and fewer. I am always looking forward to your videos.

Me: "Im pretty smart" This Dood: SCIENCE! Me: 0_o wut

Could the photomultiplier be somehow skewing test results when it changes the photon(s) into an electrical signal?

Great video! Really interesting topic.

You're relevant! I just took a while to get myself together, but you are relevant. We have so much to teach people!

How goes College? good to see you back

From my understanding, there were never hidden variables anyway, it's just instantaneous energy redistribution in space happening and the reason why it's instantaneous is that otherwise, the universe would probably collapse if it didn't correct the energy mismatch. You can notice the same exact pattern/mechanism in atoms with electrons that jump between energy levels, they do it too instantaneously, again for the same reason, energy balance due to the 1st law of thermodynamics(and if that is true, then the universe is closed system too). The very exact mechanism at its core? That's a bit tougher to figure out.

U have changed so much u are grown now :) nice video

Always love some work of a fellow Bell.

Well scientists have yet to prove the biggest question know to human kind which is: *How my wallet is always empty and my rubbish bin is always full?*

A fun thought to ponder is conceptual quality of movement, say if you move in a dream your not actually moving, but the concept retains itself as such as movement.

If your into is correct and accurate to how your channel is. You earned a subscriber from that first 30 seconds. I never really subscribe to channels but anyone who can demonstrate experiments for me to learn. I'm on it!

You will never understand just how much I need that painting of Albert Einstein in my life

Thank you for the new video.

I'm still trying to figure out if you are 18 or 45

Can you do the double slit experiment on the Halve photons?

Dude I understood what you were talking about you should be paid well for your efforts

Excellent video, well done.

could PCB way create a pcb that would act as a hub for wiring on a dirt bike that makes engine plug, battery, voltage reg, and discharge control signal output a simple interface? or is this a question better posed to them?

Seriously love the oldschool video game music!

It looks less like a rig to measure photons, and more like you built a time machine :)

This guy should be up there with backyard science, king of random and etc

thanks for great vid hon, giggles sadly we should be forgetting the reality and distractions ,and concentrating on our own conciousness ,and remembering who and where our true Mother is , As when we are only seeing a week shadow of the real reality ,our results are corrupt..

That background yodeling is hilarious

Brain overload....lol but a really cool and interesting video! Keep up the good work!!

The Variable may be in 3d physics, as in the wave function is essentially in all directions and particle may just be bouncing and spiraling thru... Just a thought TY love the vids

The beings controlling this simulation: *nervous sweating*

Y...E..A.H "I think I've got all that". 🤔

Question: Does light retain the momentum of the object it is emitted from? This may account for some things as the Earth is in motion relative to a absolute universal center. I am aware this phenomenon appears in the likes of Redshift/Blueshift, but I am curious as to if it is applicable to the "c" in and of itself. Something else, is if it is not applicable to c, one could determine the stated motion relative to universal center. I could have also just completely misunderstood your experiment and results, in which I would like to hear how so that I may better my listening skills. Regardless, good stuff.

Wow! I never thought of rotating the polarizer as equivalent to rotating the basis vectors of the system.

can you please link where i can buy your white board markers please!!!! omg i used to have the same one that i used in my old Trig class! lol

This video showed up in my feed along side my usual gun, motorcycle, and female MMA fight videos. I watched the whole video, beginning to end, and understood ZERO of what you were trying to explain. I'll just take your word for it. So, reality isn't as we perceive it, or just light? Someone give me the "Barney The Dinosaur" version of it please. Your enthusiasm is obviously authentic, and appreciated.

"PCB board" Oh, those are cool, like PIN numbers and RAM memory, or CD discs.

I keep clicking the bell but when I come back, it's not clicked.

What are the brown horizontal lines that scroll throughout your video ?

Could you use the sun as a source? Could you assign a musical value to each observable photon and listen to the bit stream live?

Everytime someone talks about entanglement I think: isn't it just because light has no time? Even if for us we can count time and interact with light in different moments, for the light existence is only one moment. So if we interact with a photon now and change one of it's characteristics, we are essentially changing it's entire existence, which can seem like it's in the past but it's not. A way to make sure is to split the photon in 2 and then take one and split again. Check if all 3 still seem entangled. If so, we could set a yes or no switch and activate it with a split electron and take it away and flip it on and off with 0 lag by interfering with the other half of the electron.

Love how he has evolved going from ripping a transformer from a tv to a proper high voltage controller

Can you please tell me which lens are you using to focus on BBO crystal?

Reminds me of camera lens filters if you put two of them together it reduces the light by a lot but if you put three of them together let's do more like, I know it depends on their polarization. Seems kind of weird that when you see it.

The universe is non-local, but only in very limited ways that do not violate relativity and conservation/symmetry which is why at a macro level we do not "notice" is my interpretation

Great video! Here may be a thought for you. :-) According to Einstein, photons do travel at the speed of light and time plus distance stops at the speed of light. That means that from a photons point of view no time is gone from its creation til its death and it hasen't moved. So according to a photon, it exists simultaneously on every spot, the whole way, at the same time. Also every split, bounce and so on is the photon at different states at same time the same place. In other word, a photon do exist everywhere in every state the entire time.

0:55 A ruler that is a Printed Circuit Board Board. Nice.

Me: scrolling YT for whatever Also Me: slams on brakes when sees a New Keysone Science vid

9:40 "Now with the general understanding out of the way.." Me: Yeah.. understanding.. haha..ha..ha.. *I UNDERSTOOD NOTHING*

i personally believe the transfer on information can be instantaneous and the key is understanding quantum entanglement i think trying to indefinitely entangle particles will allow is to make a quantum entangled network bridge allowing for secure instantaneous universal communication

11:51 Hussah! A man of quality!

Great experiment at some point over my head . But after the video it came clearer and entertaining. My final is "WTF" .

What if quantum entangled particles adhere to realism by using time as a usable dimension? For instance, a particle that is entangled can talk to its source or partner backwards in time. Wouldn't this keep speed of light's limit and locality constant? This could also be a good description for the double slit delayed choice experiment.

Polarizer only blocks light, right? Then how did the middle polarizer at 6:10 let those 45 degrees light to pass through when there were none of those present to begin with?

It is truly amazing how much you can prove with nothing but smoke and mirrors

Spooky action at a distance is referring to entangled pairs . and yes it is spooky and yes information does travel faster than light

How did you go from describing light as a byproduct of electromagnetism, as a waveform pulse... to a "photon" which implies a particle? Seems like light might be the result of an electromagnetic expression.

I love experiments involving lasers. I hear people say that laser content on youtube becomes repetitive and boring however, this video shows that that's just not the case.

Link to where the advertising ends and titled content start?

Complicated as hell! But very interesting.

there are other possibilities beyond reality being disproven or information exceeding c. for example, a flaw in the defined mathematics, or (most likely) an unforseen flaw in the machine that has not yet been accounted for. of course I wouldn't put it past reality. plenty of inexplicable things have happened to most people during their lives. just the other day i felt something hit my head, my friend on the mic heard the thing, even though i was alone in my room with no objects anywhere that could have fallen or spontaneously flung themselves.

Keystone Science: *posts video (Everyone Liked That)

@Keystone Science do you think that quantum mechanics allows there to be another world outside of this plane of reality? as in do you think there is life after death?

the universe and the moon is there and working because there is an observer outside us little humans that makes everything exist... science tries to work around it but eventually it will get to the conclusion that he exists. cheers!

Two questions: 1) did you stop to take a breath while making that video? 2) are you good at reading tongue twisters?

CRT part 2 still coming?

Buddy i shouldn't exist is what doctors have told me my whole life yet im here.