Тёмный

The F-35 is about to become a POWERHOUSE 

Sandboxx
Подписаться 415 тыс.
Просмотров 1 млн
50% 1

Lockheed Martin’s F-35 Lightning II, also commonly known as the Joint Strike Fighter, is about to undergo a largely classified facelift that promises to turn the technologically advanced aircraft into a far more capable fighter.
New upgrades include 17 new weapon systems, powerful new radar, expanded electronic warfare capabilities, powerful propulsion upgrades, and more - much of which remains tucked nearly behind the veil of mountains of classified funding.
Here's what we know.
📱 Follow Sandboxx News on social
Twitter: / sandboxxnews
Instagram: / sandboxxnews
Facebook: / sandboxxnews
TikTok: / sandboxxnews
📱 Follow Alex Hollings on social
Twitter: / alexhollings52
Instagram: / alexhollings52
Facebook: / alexhollingswrites
TikTok: www.tiktok.com...
Further Reading:
F-22/F-35 Hybrid Fighter: www.sandboxx.u...
F-35 problems: www.sandboxx.u...
F-35 Dogfight: www.sandboxx.u...
F-35 vs Su-57: www.sandboxx.u...
Citations:
TR-3: www.af.mil/New...
L3 Harris: www.l3harris.c...
Block 15: aviationweek.c...
EW Receivers: www.militaryae...
AN/APG-85: news.northropg...
Radar: aviationweek.c...
Pratt & Whitney: www.popularmec...
XA100: www.sandboxx.u...
Chaff: aviationweek.c...

Опубликовано:

 

26 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 3,4 тыс.   
@Jaco93
@Jaco93 Год назад
HOLY CRAP GUYS, THE F35 IS GETTING A MITOCHONDRIA!!!
@MrAjmay1
@MrAjmay1 Год назад
But only from its mom...
@alexlohan2988
@alexlohan2988 Год назад
@@MrAjmay1 hehe… I see what you did there
@gups4963
@gups4963 Год назад
But is it Mighty?!
@damianketcham
@damianketcham Год назад
@@MrAjmay1
@mainiac4pats
@mainiac4pats Год назад
Don’t forget the chaff!
@Noisy_Cricket
@Noisy_Cricket Год назад
If they're already doing this for the F35, just imagine the B21 and NGAD...
@classicgalactica5879
@classicgalactica5879 Год назад
​@@sporkconsumingsoup The USAF announced approximately two years ago that it had already flown a 6th generation fighter jet, and that it had broken records. What precisely that means is anyone's guess, and it has been crickets since.
@twixxtro
@twixxtro Год назад
@@classicgalactica5879 tr3b black manta
@Noisy_Cricket
@Noisy_Cricket Год назад
@@classicgalactica5879 I think what will make the NGAD 6th gen will be very high speed, long range, huge (for a fighter) stealth weapons bay capacity (6-8 AMRAAMs + 2 Sidewinders), extreme A2A radar and infrared tracking distances, the ability to command and mange drones + manned F15EX missile trucks, and a 2 seat configuration (1 pilot + 1"RIO"/drone manager). As great as the F35 is, I imagine there's a need for a "RIO" type to help sort through all the information to actually take full control of a very large air battle. And the F35 needs more range and speed for very high threat environments. I think the NGAD will serve that purpose.
@RandomSwede-1
@RandomSwede-1 Год назад
@@sporkconsumingsoup The secretary of air force said just a couple of days ago that they are planning to have 200 NGAD-fighters and about 1000 drones.
@jamesturner9651
@jamesturner9651 Год назад
@@Noisy_Cricket for better or worse I imagine the role of “RIO” is going to be filled by AI.
@robfarrell2997
@robfarrell2997 Год назад
My whole family appreciates and watches all of your content. As a retired Navy man, I would love it if you consider doing an episode on what a future Carrier air wing will look like with both manned and unmanned aircraft. It seems like the F-35's capabilities will make this possible sooner rather than later.
@tonikaihola5408
@tonikaihola5408 Год назад
Looks like we are going to get the Block 4 version here in Finland, yay!
@LRRPFco52
@LRRPFco52 Год назад
There is a tiny window of time where Putin has to invade before Finland’s F-35A Block 4 orders start delivering and get into operational status with the Finnish Air Force. Once Finland has enough of its order, any Russian invasion will be curb-stomped with blistering losses to their force structure in the Saint Petersburg Military District and any additional forces allocated for the invasion of Finland. The problem is that Russia has intelligence based on what it wants to see regarding Finland, not what the reality is. They don’t even understand or accept the events of the Winter War and Continuation War history, but instead have created their own version of the Russo-Finnish wars from 1939-1944 that have very little relationship to reality. Either way, they see Finland as belonging to them, created by the Czar in 1809. Due to Finland’s tiny population, they assume it’s just a pushover to take, far less of a challenge than Ukraine. What they don’t understand is the Karelian Isthmus and how it channelizes any ground combat elements into a kill zone. There are no basing footprints from which to stage and successfully invade north of there, because there’s nothing but forest and lakes along most of the border, uninhabited on both sides. Putin appears to be leaning on NATO members like Turkey and Hungary to delay Finland’s accession to NATO, in preparation for the invasion so that Article 5 can’t be implemented.
@BaldHeadedManc
@BaldHeadedManc Год назад
You gone get some kid's r' us f-35's
@MeanLaQueefa
@MeanLaQueefa Год назад
👍 nice
@bevpotter9938
@bevpotter9938 Год назад
Canada as well. Nice.
@mike4769
@mike4769 Год назад
Putin gave this comment a thumbs down
@jamesedwards6173
@jamesedwards6173 Год назад
5:38 - 5:47 A change from 5 to 20 is described as "a 75% increase", but that is not a 75% increase; it is a 300% increase (an increase to 400% of its previous version). (A 75% increase would be 5+.75x5 = 8.75.)
@wkgurr
@wkgurr 7 месяцев назад
Hahaha, the increase is exactly what the purveyors of this scrap heap claim it to be. Even if it is minus 100% the dealers trying desperately to selll this lemon will serenade about its steller performance. The F35 is and always was dead on arrival.
@jamesedwards6173
@jamesedwards6173 7 месяцев назад
wkgurr, I guess it's nice you proudly parade around your ignorance?? 🤷‍♂️
@newhailman
@newhailman 5 месяцев назад
The math police strike again 🙄
@jamesedwards6173
@jamesedwards6173 5 месяцев назад
@@newhailman Percentages mean very specific things. Use them correctly. The error in this was BAD.
@newhailman
@newhailman 5 месяцев назад
@@jamesedwards6173 oh come on, a decimal here, a decimal there what's the difference 🙄
@jeffreykleppe6321
@jeffreykleppe6321 Год назад
Going from 5 receivers to 20 isn't a 75% increase, it's a 300% increase.
@tobyihli9470
@tobyihli9470 Год назад
Each F35 is an AWACS plane to a group of 4th generation fighters, through Link 16 and soon Link 22. It’s already a truly amazing machine.
@fredwerza3478
@fredwerza3478 Год назад
It's highly classified, but there are rumors that each F-35 can also control & command 10 Predator drones during combat and recon operations --- mind blowing stuff !!
@Karl-Benny
@Karl-Benny Год назад
So is the Gripen and has been for years
@fowlerfreak7420
@fowlerfreak7420 Год назад
Link 22 complements Link 16, MADL is compatible with both. Just to clarify in case someone thought they were mutually exclusive.
@garydobbs5159
@garydobbs5159 Год назад
It’s a inferior knock off of a F22 and won’t stand a chance against Russias 5th Gen or Chinas. Piece of crap. Small wings. Very little maneuverability. It can fight long range but so could the F4 Phantom my dad flew in Vietnam but we know what happened when a face to face dogfight occurred. This is todays F4 Phantom.
@uwannakatana3990
@uwannakatana3990 Год назад
@@garydobbs5159 lmao China doesn’t have true 5th gen aircraft and the Russians don’t even have enough SU-57s to fill an estire squadron
@finnmeldrum7264
@finnmeldrum7264 Год назад
You can tell just from the intro that Alex is VERY excited about this one.
@ffdv7458
@ffdv7458 Год назад
I thought he was having a stroke
@carkid7640
@carkid7640 Год назад
@@UnCannyValley67 the only one confused is u who clearly can’t understand sarcasm lmao embarrassing
@mrspaceman2764
@mrspaceman2764 Год назад
Hell yeah, we were told the F35 would be the US multirole workhorse until around 2070. These upgrade percentages make it seem possible now. And we're just getting into adaptive cycle engines. We can kind of imagine where it'll be by 2040, when they'll be deploying the next generation after these upgrades.
@Inertia888
@Inertia888 Год назад
To be fair, this new RADAR is pretty frickin' sweet. And that's not even getting into whatever they have for sensor fusion, (part of 'Kill Web') which I feel like not many people in the world really know the true current capabilities of.
@freedomisnotnegotiable
@freedomisnotnegotiable Год назад
F-35 is already the laughing joke #1 in this world… absolute ridiculous never in real action, probably cannot even shot a $12 hobby ballon from the sky. The F-35 is the best example of how corrupt, destroyed and useless the American Military industry has become…
@jimgessner6071
@jimgessner6071 Год назад
I'm imagining high altitude F-15s, loaded to the gills, functioning as missile trucks, and the F-35 as a gun sight of sorts.
@FloridaManMatty
@FloridaManMatty Месяц назад
And you would be 100% correct. But it’s even bigger and better than that. F-35, B-21, RQ-180 etc… All of our VVLO (Very Very Low Observable) aircraft with modern data links will be able to find, target, and track while sending targeting data to a missile truck like the F-15 as you mentioned, OR … A C-130 or other cargo plane with Rapid Dragon or similar capabilities, or a B-1 OR (even better still!) HIMARS and other ground based systems. Imagine an F-35 entering contested airspace, linking to a RQ-180 that relays targeting data to a B-52 1500+ nm distant that’s loaded to the rafters with ALCMs.
@willymac5036
@willymac5036 23 дня назад
@@FloridaManMattyI believe the USMC had an exercise about a year or two ago (not long after they received their first HIMARS) where they proved that the F-35 indeed CAN connect to and provide targeting for HIMARS rockets.
@Chuck_Hooks
@Chuck_Hooks Год назад
F-35Bs alone have revolutionized Allied carrier warfare. Japan will soon be operating its first fixed-wing carriers since WWII. Unthinkable without Japanese F-35Bs.
@roninjedi2494
@roninjedi2494 Год назад
Revolutionized as it the first carrier defense fighter that lacks the range and fuel to intercept long range bombers thus making the carriers completely vulnerable with zero defense to long range anti ship missiles? Yeah sounds revolutionary in the completely wrong direction. That’s why the PACOM defenders are begging for the 15 EX’s to get to Guam and the navy is searching frantically to get a new interceptor with fuel to actually be able to protect the fleet which the f-35’s cannot
@Chuck_Hooks
@Chuck_Hooks Год назад
@RoninJedi If Japan is in combat with China, it won't be alone. It will be Japan and the US. Meaning Japanese F-35Bs will be operating with American F-35Bs operating off Wasp and America-class plus Japanese and US Aegis ships that will have an answer for Chinese bombers.
@user-os6ch5pt7w
@user-os6ch5pt7w Год назад
@@roninjedi2494 500nm combat radius from a flat top is MORE than enough to intercept threats from China. What are you smoking? The EX has a combat radius of ~600nm.
@marrqi7wini54
@marrqi7wini54 Год назад
​@@user-os6ch5pt7w 600nm? I think you mean 600km.
@youtvcdvb
@youtvcdvb Год назад
@@marrqi7wini54 Nautical miles. Its a little more than a mile.
@peterarmstrong6928
@peterarmstrong6928 Год назад
I'm test pilot for B.A.E,,and I've been lucky enough to fly this aircraft, amongst others,,this is by far the best of integration, weapons delivery,multi targeting and stealth, although it can only be flown supersonic,for a limited time,but man,,it's awesome.
@Roachman-TT
@Roachman-TT Год назад
How long can it be flown supersonic?
@michaelmckinney401
@michaelmckinney401 Год назад
@peterarmsrtong6928 i hate a phone warrior whos sat at home on a PlayStation thinking that makes him an expert on real aircraft don't you?
@ZimZam131
@ZimZam131 Год назад
@@michaelmckinney401Why do you think it is not possible for an actual pilot to comment on a RU-vid video? I work for a defense contractor and I’ve met plenty of pilots, including F-35 pilots. They’re people just like the rest of us.
@nemiw4429
@nemiw4429 Год назад
​@@ZimZam131because there are more liars then pilots. So chance to meet a liar.liar.pants on fire is higher uhhhh rappy mappy.
@ZimZam131
@ZimZam131 Год назад
@@nemiw4429 The way he describes the aircraft is enough to convince me. Integration and weapons delivery are key elements a lay person wouldn’t think to contrast against other fighter platforms.
@randyrobey5643
@randyrobey5643 Год назад
I understand the issues involved for the engine upgrade. The more advanced engine sounds great, but it is very new. The less capable engine is still a big upgrade in a mature field like jet engine design. My first concern is reliability. The F-35 is a one-engine fighter, so there may be no real option but to go with the most tested and most durable engine we have right now. The more advanced engine design will have its day.
@gagepoynor7997
@gagepoynor7997 Год назад
those jet engines are so advanced that more goes into making one of the turbine blades alone than most entire planes throughout history. They're so advanced, that any nation that somehow got their hands on even a full f35 would have its ability to reverse engineer or analyze other thigns. "These nano coated ceramic alloy turbine blades are kept cool through microscopic tubules throughout the material, but it appears when we touched something uh oh and then tried to soft fire the engine, and it just exploded instead
@thomaswillman4187
@thomaswillman4187 Год назад
Look at how the P51 Mustang Merlin engine developed over a long period of time, and beet Ford's twin cam all aluminum engine that looked great and had all the potential but was too new to bet on!
@Adierit
@Adierit Год назад
@@gagepoynor7997 Learning how to apply that coating would take production of infrastructure, and tooling. While they might be able to understand its basic concept, actually reproducing it would take decades of trial and error.
@amazin7006
@amazin7006 Год назад
The point of an upgrade is to learn from the past problems of the same platform and fix reliability issues. More often the new engine is more reliable...
@bushcraft4life964
@bushcraft4life964 Год назад
Be nice to field a few for let's say "testing" of the GE version!
@140theguy
@140theguy Год назад
The F-35 going to be in service for decades it's worth every penny. The fuel savings of the Adaptive cycle engine will easily outweigh the cost of development and upgrades.
@therealman2016
@therealman2016 Год назад
But it’s crazy how a f-18 is less expensive to fly still
@Kman31ca
@Kman31ca Год назад
That'll probably be the next major upgrade. Probably around 2030ish once the tech has matured.
@user-os6ch5pt7w
@user-os6ch5pt7w Год назад
@@therealman2016 Not by much, and it depends on what evaluation you go by. They, also, forget to add in the maintenance on all the pods the F/A-18 needs to do its job, too. That come standard on the F-35.
@Eboreg2
@Eboreg2 Год назад
Let me let you in on a little secret: upgrades in fuel efficiency on jet fighter engines are not meant to reduce costs but increase range.
@actionjksn
@actionjksn Год назад
They aren't doing that adaptive cycle GE engine, they are getting the cheap one from Pratt and Whitney with minor improvements.
@Ottee2
@Ottee2 Год назад
Thanks for the update on this incredible aircraft. Word has it that the top secret add-on is a back seat and separate canopy for a launchable R2-D2. 😊
@Legion-xq8eo
@Legion-xq8eo Год назад
R2 could be my wizzo anytime!! 🤣😂 he’s the OG wizzo imho
@paulg3216
@paulg3216 Год назад
Alex, apologies if I've misunderstood what you were saying, but going from five to twenty-five EW receivers is a 400% increase, not a 75% increase.
@Sarah-vp4sl
@Sarah-vp4sl Год назад
I noticed that as well. But to clarify a jump from 5 to 20 is a 300% increase 400% would be 25.
@Siskiyous6
@Siskiyous6 Год назад
They are doing The Big Rewrite! A point about doubling the range of target acquisitions is the exponential jump in area that represents.
@granatmof
@granatmof Год назад
USN is currently outranged by China's truck based anti-ship missiles. If the US lost even one carrier defending Taiwan, the American public may think the cost is too high to defend Taiwan. As Ho Chi Minh demonstrated you don't defeat the American Military, you defeat the American People and Politicians. Without public support, the US military is dramatically limited.
@dgthe3
@dgthe3 Год назад
@@granatmof My guess is that hitting a carrier would solidify the resolve of the American people. Namely because it would almost have to happen as a surprise attack when the carrier is sitting in a vulnerable position. Post day 1 they get way harder to hit.
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 Год назад
And the SAM sites the Radar will awake.
@brycemedvin8765
@brycemedvin8765 Год назад
@@granatmof Yeah, except that first striking a US aircraft carrier is probably the easiest way to get the American public to 1000% support bombing and counter-attacking you into the stone age...
@watchthe1369
@watchthe1369 Год назад
I remember the A-6 TRAM that made the modern upgraded planes totally different from the Vietnam era versions. They were still a Bomb Buggy, but they were much more accurate bomb buggies and in all weather.
@atonal440
@atonal440 Год назад
This huge program really proves out the wisdom of making one "joint strike fighter" that all services can use. Yes, it resulted in compromises and delays in the design, but so much of modern weaponry is defined by electronics and software that is common to all variants and can be upgraded in sync.
@dirtysilver2841
@dirtysilver2841 Год назад
Yeah, except for the part where the plane is a death trap. The engine has a mechanical flaw where the drive shaft will split in two. When that happens the plane literally flips over and accelerates toward the ground in less than a second. This flaw cannot be predicted, avoided, or even stopped. It's a pray to Jesus it never happens flaw. So much so, ejection is not an option, even at 10,000 feet, because all that will accomplish is putting one self in the path of a crashing air craft. The solution was to design an ejection system that senses when that drive shaft even shimmies. When it does the pilot is ejected by computer fast to avoid getting trapped inside the plane, it often results in serious injury. These injuries are enough to remove pilots from their career fields permanently. Additionally, these engines run so hot, you can see them on thermals 10 miles out. Well before then enter any effective range of combat. In fact the engine noise is so loud it's become common practice to put a minimum flight speed on mission requirements as to behead of the sound at all times. This way targets can't know it is coming. If you nave never heard an F35, then you are in for a surprise. Bring protection, it is the loudest jet you will ever hear. The systems are so complex that when it makes 1 flight, it must enter a 400 hour man maintenance inspection, before it can fly again. All in all the F35 will cost 233 Billion dollars over the lift time of the jet. that is over 20 times the cost of an F15, with a fraction of the capabilities.
@ryanperry7956
@ryanperry7956 Год назад
That’s a nice argument you got there, mind backing it up with a source. The teething problems of the early F-35s have long been ironed out.
@YommoBarIndustries
@YommoBarIndustries Год назад
@@dirtysilver2841 You've got a vivid imagination bro.
@wallyw4965
@wallyw4965 Год назад
​@Dirty Silver yea its called innovation and research and development...all things have problems, they were worked out already...your the exact type of person the video referred to, a hater from past perception that doesn't speak to today...I saw all those videos from back then too, did you know we have only lost a grand total of 2 f35s? Russia has built a handful of wannabe stealth su57s and they routinely crash and burn during test flights...india fully walked away due to lack of stealth not happy with what they were seeing with its radar signature...gonna hate on a stealth plane, thats the one
@jamescarter8311
@jamescarter8311 Год назад
@@dirtysilver2841 So, it's never happened.
@SovereignKnight74
@SovereignKnight74 Год назад
At first, I wasn't too crazy for the F-35, but now, I'm stoked about it!
@LRRPFco52
@LRRPFco52 Год назад
Safety performance alone justifies the JSF program in spades. With the 4th Gen fighters, we lost 515 airframes with 189 fatalities in their first 10 years of operational service alone. F-16 had 143 airframes lost with 71 fatalities in the first 10 years, safest single engine fighter in USAF history up to that point. USAF has only crashed 2 F-35As so far. USMC crashed 2 F-35Bs, UK lost 1 F-35B off QE, USN crashed 1 F-35C. Japanese Air Defense Forces lost 1 F-35A with the only fatality in the entire program’s history so far. All European nations have never crashed or lost an F-35A/B so far. First flight was Dec 2006. That’s just not a thing, and yet here we are.
@frankwainwright7826
@frankwainwright7826 Год назад
​@@LRRPFco52 the UK is a European nation 💀 apart from that well said
@STB-jh7od
@STB-jh7od Год назад
​@LRRPFco52 F-16 issues were caused by faulty gyroscope and USAF knew about it and covered it up for years
@STB-jh7od
@STB-jh7od Год назад
​@LRRPFco52 F-16 issues were caused by faulty gyroscope and USAF knew about it and covered it up for years
@Jack-it2pe
@Jack-it2pe Год назад
@@LRRPFco52 Good comment, nice bit of perspective on things.
@hoghogwild
@hoghogwild Год назад
So much better than the shorts. I shouldn't know what Alex looks like.
@tunejunky
@tunejunky Год назад
some things are worth paying for, and the biggest price tag is for the science behind this airframe. i come from the more traditional mindset of designing an airframe for its role, but i've been taught the lesson our adversaries would be wise to consider - knowledge IS power. and nothing knows airspace like the F 35
@bekeneel
@bekeneel Год назад
Yes over that time like a decade, that's peanuts for the US & their defense budget. On top of that many other countries joined & invested in the F35 program.
@saquist
@saquist Год назад
This was not worth paying for at all compared what we should have received. The F35 should never ever have been produced as 3 fighters in one. It should never have been designed concurrent with mass production, It should never have designed mass production stealth along side with sensor fusion. That should have been the next platform once the software was understood. It should have been 3 separate fighters at least. One should have been stealth, the other should have been a VTOL and the other a Navy fighter. The sensor fusion should have been given to the Navy fighter. The Airforce should have gotten the Stealth (as usual). That would leave the NGAD for the NAVY. Instead the Airforce will now spend double the money on the F35 and the NGAD. It makes zero sense.
@willberry6434
@willberry6434 Год назад
Excited that we in Canada are getting the block 4
@biffpope9750
@biffpope9750 Год назад
Terrific update Alex...keep it.up...you're killing it on air power!!!
@fredricksmith-something.2125
The new Electronic Warfare upgrades are insane. One of the biggest criticisms was how the air frame and software was specifically designed to upgrade without significant redesigns to the fighter. Critics took this as an ASSEMBLY LINE idea. Not the case. Just wait until AI starts chipping in. Scary
@TheNucMed
@TheNucMed Год назад
Exactly.
@mikebrown9997
@mikebrown9997 Год назад
The GE variable cycle engine should be utilized to save fuel, give longer range and overall performance.
@Chironex_Fleckeri
@Chironex_Fleckeri Год назад
For the Pacific, yes. Especially when tankers may be targeted by enemies at enormous ranges.
@granatmof
@granatmof Год назад
@@mcs699 or just the block 5 or 6 or 7 revision. F35s are sticking around for a while even with the NGADs. The US is going to start sustaining a very diverse fleet of aircraft, though possibly the NGADs won't be available for export so NATO allies will have to rely on future upgrade revisions.
@RohanSingh-zc4bm
@RohanSingh-zc4bm Год назад
We still don't really know for sure that block 4 upgrades include which engine.Earlier they were saying that block 4 will have adaptive cycle engines there are still some chances of it getting GE engines
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 Год назад
IF the frame can handle it, it also carries more load now, and wings do not just grow.
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 Год назад
@@mcs699 can you define "Soon"? i am not so certain after the F-35 program, any airframe will stay the way they were actually designed long enough, to actually create enough standardized spare parts. NGAD might become bigger than F-22, and probably not cheaper either. As for the B-21 Raider, Will it be that Modular Lego-plane that does everything, a subsonic Airplane does, if you switch out modules? Bomber, AWACS, Tanker, Drone control center. You'll need a lot of them, if things have to be done simultaneously.
@angelosasso1653
@angelosasso1653 Год назад
Together with the Boeing fuel tanker drone and things like the loyal Wingman it can safely be said, we are working hand in hand with machines already.
@deltavee2
@deltavee2 Год назад
Trust well placed. Properly prepared they will be able to carry out manoeuvres no human could, or want to, attempt, like missile-level G forces that would turn a pilot into strawberry jam very evenly distributed all over the cockpit. No human inside simplifies a lot of the equation. Add to that it will be semi-intelligent or better and will be perfectly happy to die to protect you. Russia simply isn't a contender and China won't have anything even approaching the high-level chip tech required. Best they can do on their own is cell phones and talking fridges. woo
@JoshDownin
@JoshDownin Год назад
We've been doing that since the invention of machines; I'm not sure what your point is
@Deeldoh-buhtcheeks
@Deeldoh-buhtcheeks Год назад
Can't miss those PT belts at 5:50
@davidbeattie4294
@davidbeattie4294 Год назад
The F-35 is less an aircraft than a complex networked computer system. Many of its significant warfighting capabilities are related to its computing capabilities. The fact that these capabilites can be hugely enhanced over time without rebuilding the airframe is a major warfighting advantage.
@AB-or1uz
@AB-or1uz Год назад
@Brian Waas Look up "Out Of The Shadows [Dutch F-35s]" by Frank Crebas. F35's are more than capable of competing against 4th gen fighters in dogfights. Here is an excerpt on page 35. "Knight divulged a little more information about flying basic fighter maneuvers (BFM) in an F-35. ‘When our envelope was cleared to practise BFM we got the opportunity to fight some fourth generation fighters. Remember, back then the rumors were that the F-35 was a pig. The first time the opponents showed up [in the training area] they had wing tanks along with a bunch of missiles. I guess they figured that being in a dirty configuration wouldn’t really matter and that they would still easily outmaneuver us. By the end of the week, though, they had dropped their wing tanks, transitioned to a single centerline fuel tank and were still doing everything they could not to get gunned by us. A week later they stripped the jets clean of all external stores, which made the BFM fights interesting, to say the least…"
@thomaswillman4187
@thomaswillman4187 Год назад
@Brian Waas Are you qualified to make this assessment? If so how?
@amistrophy
@amistrophy Год назад
​@Brian Waas the F35 is supermanuverable and can consistently outfight Slick F16s while under combat load. It has the most powerful jet engine in service on a fighter, massive control surfaces, as well as a fly by wire system that allows full exploitation of aerodynamic instability. Never mind the fact that new missiles like the ASRAAM, AIM9X,IRIST etc employ Off boresight targeting capability Allowing the pilot to utilize the F35's 360 sensor coverage to aquire lock, link that info to the missile, and send it off the rail burning whatever fucking direction they want, including directly backwards. Oh yeah and with the new helmet integrated displays that can see through the plane itself, the process is simple.
@amistrophy
@amistrophy Год назад
​@Brian Waas EA6 prowler is also retired btw. Old old platform that served well for it's time. F35 currently utilizes growler (EA18) EWAR tech integrated into it's airframe organically.
@techtical7079
@techtical7079 Год назад
@@amistrophy "the F35 is supermanuverable and can consistently outfight Slick F16s while under combat load." No. It's not "supermanuverable" not even close, the aircraft was never designed for dogfighting, it's also not expected to really see any dogfights. An F16 outclasses the F35 in maneuverability, speed and engine power. The F35 is stealth and extremely advanced, however it does not compare to 4th generation fighters in maneuverability.
@dugiejoness5197
@dugiejoness5197 Год назад
I remember when, as part of the YF-22 program, a special anti-overload cover with a tilting backrest of up to 75 degrees was planned. This was to help the pilot endure extreme g. It would be nice to add this to the next generation of fighters so the AI can outmaneuver the AA missile on its own. It was also then that the advanced GE F120 was created, which worked in a changed double-pass cycle, and now everyone is raving about what a super-hyper 5000 is, etc.
@srinitaaigaura
@srinitaaigaura Год назад
Why bother dodging missiles if you could shoot them down with AI automatic defense? With sensors this capable the F-35 can do it easily.
@steveperreira5850
@steveperreira5850 Год назад
Better yet, ground the useless pilots. They have not been needed for decades. Long ago digital computers replaced them. The military keeps them because the military is run by dimwit pilots, with no real vision, except for the desire to pick up chicks. Being a fighter pilot, helps a lot. I know all this stuff, I was in the military, I am a pilot but not a military pilot, And I’m an engineer who worked on big-time military projects including fat pig fighter called the F 35. Also the F 22. About a tremendous waste of money when drones is the real solution…
@steveperreira5850
@steveperreira5850 Год назад
After all you have said it is clear that the pilot retards mission capability. Can’t you see????…….?????
@oliverherzog7702
@oliverherzog7702 Год назад
@@steveperreira5850 It depends on what mission you do with the plane. Most hot war mission could be tackled with drones, but some mission military jet aircraft do, can't be done by drones. Peace time air policing for one should and needs to be done by humans. But there is a slick T-7 with 1 - 2 AIM120/AIM9 would be more than sufficient. So there is not much of a point in having a cockpit in forward deployed F-/B-/(A)-planes.
@kingdomofvinland8827
@kingdomofvinland8827 Год назад
Why was the seat not included in the final design?
@TomatoFettuccini
@TomatoFettuccini 8 месяцев назад
$15 billion over a decade is $1.5 billion per year; which works out to $48,387 per plane over a decade. That's practically a rounding error, and well worth it.
@rudyyarbrough5122
@rudyyarbrough5122 Год назад
I have flown many types of aircraft and when a pilot tells you he likes the one he is flying the best, it makes sense to believe him. F-16, F-15, F-18, F-4, and many pilots from other countries have all said that the F-35 was the best most awesome plane they had ever flown and they didn't want to go back. Having been in many friendly dog fights, knowledge is king followed by speed. It can be visual or electronic but that is the edge every fighter pilot wants. This plane coupled with all of its sensors offers so much info that it might lead to an overload of the pilot. I understand that they now have a threat analysis computer that prioritizes the threats and can actually engage them in the correct order of danger. The new off-boresight helmet also makes getting on the 6 o: clock unnecessary and makes them even more deadly. At the Red Flag exercise, the kill ratio was one F-35 to 15 F-15s. I was a head-on Sparrow guy and a tail-end AIM-9 guy but those days are over with this plane. In a 4th gen fighter, I would not want to go against one.
@cameronkrause4712
@cameronkrause4712 Год назад
you make some good points. I am not a pilot, but since my country, Canada, now is going with the f-35 instead of the Gripen, I am wondering if the f-35 is always the best choice. What happens if NATO gets loaded up with F-35's and then Russia comes up with satellite tracking, and ground based radar systems and planes with radar systems that make the stealth ability of the f-35 far less effective than it is right now? Seems like it might be wise to have a variety of planes that have different abilities. I don't like all the eggs in one basket when it comes to weaponry.
@Tommy-sn2dm
@Tommy-sn2dm Год назад
Tracking planes with satellite? Satellite is way to fast
@De_cool_dude
@De_cool_dude Год назад
​@@cameronkrause4712 have you seen Russia's excuse for a stealth fighter? And they do have radars that can track the F-35 (those are Russia's words, so take it with a grain of salt), but to track the F-35 the radar needs to turn on in the first place. When it does, itll eat a AARG-ER.
@kwkfortythree39
@kwkfortythree39 Год назад
​@@cameronkrause4712 if F35B can be detected at practical distances, imagine how hopeless would be the non stealth planes. They could not even take off.
@drake101987
@drake101987 Год назад
@@De_cool_dude The radars that Russia can detect it with are long-wave radars that have no useful accuracy for attempting to shoot it down. The stealth is only from the short-wave radars. Those are the radars are used for targeting missiles. So, yes, Russia can see them coming but they can't do anything about it.
@johnroof2663
@johnroof2663 Год назад
I'm quite sure when they designed to F-35, it was to be able to upgrade it continuously. There were a lot of critics out there saying that it was a turkey. But the more they fly this thing and learn how it operates, the more it's changing people's minds.
@trajhenkhet02
@trajhenkhet02 Год назад
Going forward building new fighters are going to take more than one nation to stay ahead. I think the F-22 is going to be the last single nation built/designed fighter for a few years. It takes more time money and effort to build one of these craft then any one nation, even the US of A can muster.
@thorwaldjohanson2526
@thorwaldjohanson2526 Год назад
The f35 has been a huge success due to economy of scale. Nobody can compete with it. It is cheaper now than 4th fen fighters were, because they build so many of them and sell them to allies.
@Gunni1972
@Gunni1972 Год назад
@@thorwaldjohanson2526 Why do you think, it became cheaper? When the Idea for the F-35 was pitched to congress, they said it would cost about 35 mio$. So the Government ordered 2600 pieces. with the current price, no more than 1200 will be ordered.
@thorwaldjohanson2526
@thorwaldjohanson2526 Год назад
@@Gunni1972 the cost is around 70 million right now. That is not that much compared to other fighter jets. A Saab gripen, usually considered a cost effective alternative is 85m, a Eurofighter is around 124m
@termitreter6545
@termitreter6545 Год назад
@@thorwaldjohanson2526 The 70m cost figure is nonsense. One of the few reliable numbers we hace is the predicted lifetime cost at purchase, which according to Germany, UK or Denmark is closer to 250 million dollar or even higher. The F-35 is an extremely expensive plane, and the cost estimates are constantly increassing. Look how this vid is praising the next costly upgrades, despite the aircraft not even being fully introduced. I thought its sensors and networking was amazing, so why do we need yet another radar upgrade? Mind, the Eurofighter, while not having full stealth, is designed as an expensive high end fighter. Only an F22 can compete with that planes flight capabilities. The F-35 was supposed to be a replacement for lower cost, less capable but more multirole workhorse aircraft, especially F16 and F18. Its was never supposed to be this expensive, thats why they made so many compromises, eg with its single engine and comparatively low flight speed. And thats a really big problem, the aircraft cant really fulfill the role that it was supposed to take. Its a fine aircraft probably now, but its taking away too much budget while delivering too little capability. Stuff like the hyped modern networking (which we had since the 80s) is trying to find a purpose for the plane.
@MarkWilliams-ix1qf
@MarkWilliams-ix1qf Год назад
I am concerned that the F35 has been delayed and costly, but now it seems to be a usable warcraft. But the fact that is can be greatly upgraded without developing a whole new platform is outstanding. Being able to add major improvements is a huge advantage.
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 Год назад
that was one of the purpose's of F-35, to be able to incorporate new tech.
@Rhaspun
@Rhaspun Год назад
I remember when some members of Congress had complained about the F-15. It has its own issues when it was brought out.
@paul123ggggggggg
@paul123ggggggggg Год назад
thats because youre a sheep that listens to nay sayers to anything new.
@ARICKROSSPRODUCTION
@ARICKROSSPRODUCTION Год назад
@@Rhaspun this TIME is different than 1975. things are really bad.
@nelson_rebel3907
@nelson_rebel3907 Год назад
Yea this is actually one of the main reasons the F35 wasnt specifically designed as a pure air-to-air fighter because of how technology has largely made that idea irrelevant in a real combat scenario.
@militaryenthusiast1929
@militaryenthusiast1929 Год назад
I love SANDBOXX
@blitskreegdeantioch5851
@blitskreegdeantioch5851 Год назад
Propose then
@biancaortegaa
@biancaortegaa Год назад
​@@blitskreegdeantioch5851 We do, by watching
@BungieStudios
@BungieStudios Год назад
Send a letter through Sandboxx confessing your love.
@buckeyesfan4700
@buckeyesfan4700 Год назад
Your not the only one
@samdenham1181
@samdenham1181 Год назад
Same
@wkrapek
@wkrapek Год назад
I remember MacOS 7.6 waaaaay back in the late 90s right when Steve Jobs was coming back. No *apparent* change from 7.5 - you’d never know there was an upgrade from looking at it - but they’d picked through the entire OS and cleaned it up in preparation for MacOS 8.0. Which *was* a dramatic shift. In 7.6 my Mac was a hell of a lot more stable. And “virtual memory” was so good my Mac acted like it had twice the RAM. So I know TR 3 all by itself might turn out a dramatically improved machine.
@tothphu
@tothphu Год назад
I love these, but as a software engineer I can not imagine how bad the CPUs were if they can lift power by 37x. 37x is the difference between Core2Duo P8600 and AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X, 2008 vs 2019. So not that big compared to commercially available growth.
@Pushing_Pixels
@Pushing_Pixels Год назад
I was thinking about that. The biggest change since then is the very large expansion in the number of cores modern processors use. I wonder if this kind of system leans on a smaller number of very fast "cores" or lots of parallel processing, or both? It's likely they are shifting from one to the other and have something like a big.LITTLE design ready to go (but a custom architecture). That kind of change would require a lot of re-writing of software to optimize. There's a lot of sub-systems feeding in data they need to co-ordinate and synthesize, and billions of lines of code already in this aircraft.
@tothphu
@tothphu Год назад
I'm pretty sure each subsystem has its own process, which lends itself for parallel processing. As well as signal processing for individual sensors. The fusion part might actually turn out to be simpler than you think (or it might be more difficult). But I think those are pretty nicely parallelisable nonetheless.
@tothphu
@tothphu Год назад
The billions of lines of code statement I think is so much more than reality. A few million lines of code can already do a lot. Billions is VERY hard to manage, plus not needed.
@ChrisVanMiddelkoop
@ChrisVanMiddelkoop Год назад
The background videos are super dope. Really cool formations with different fighters. Love all the LN jets!
@thomassecurename3152
@thomassecurename3152 Год назад
I’m always left wordless and left with little to comment upon. So a thank you for the efforts in time and production of these vids. Tom.
@accountantthe3394
@accountantthe3394 Год назад
damn...low bar there
@user-cd7jj5dv9o
@user-cd7jj5dv9o Год назад
great video, love the series! But 5 to 20 is a 300% increase, not 75% ((20-5) / 5)
@mendo1522
@mendo1522 Год назад
Noticed that too. 75% decrease, 300% increase. 5:38
@boodebamboo
@boodebamboo Год назад
I was looking for that comment! 👍
@valuedhumanoid6574
@valuedhumanoid6574 Год назад
When the F-35 was in testing and it got whooped by an F-16, everyone lost their minds (including me) but it was a very deceptive test. The software was so conservative in the F-35 that it was almost unfightable. But that was intentional. We just didn't know that's part of the test and eval program. The pilots even told the press and they still ran with it. It was a false narrative. Once they opened up the limits and made it like it was supposed to be, it would blow the doors off an F-16. So now we're really seeing the true teeth of the beast.
@Condor1970
@Condor1970 Год назад
Honestly, I think the GE XA-100 is the way to go. The more of that design manufactured, the more cost effective it will be to benefit the NGAD as well.
@alpacaofthemountain8760
@alpacaofthemountain8760 Год назад
What’s that?
@ericb.4358
@ericb.4358 Год назад
That GE Dual Cycle engine has been under development for over a decade and is now READY. That engine could be an on-going replacement for the P&W in legacy F-35s and original in the new block versions (except the vertical take-off models). The F-35 JSF will need that extra Dual Cycle range in the Pacific Theater. GIVE PACIFIC THEATER F-35s THE DUAL CYCLE GE ENGINE! If we're so interested in saving money and dulling the tip of the spear then give other theater F35s the upgraded P&W engine. OR... save the GE Dual Cycle engine for the GEN. 6 fighter.
@Nightsight971
@Nightsight971 Год назад
I would like to see more F35B model type aircraft. When carriers are sunk and runways are cratered, it just makes so much more sense for everyone to be using a supersonic VTOL. The British taught us how to land the F4U Corsair on carriers during WW2 and they are at it again with the F35B. They have developed the SRVL (Shipborne Rolling Vertical Landing) which doesn't require fuel or ammo to be dumped to reduce weight like the VTOL landing. The SRVL could be used on land as well if needed. Now I do understand F35B carries less fuel and ammo than the other variants, but those are the deficiencies that need more work. I support thrust vectoring for all aircraft and missiles. Not for the fun airshow manuevers that bleed energy, but for turning an aircraft as tight as the human body will allow and for short take offs and landings.
@machtschnell7452
@machtschnell7452 Год назад
The F35B can only go supersonic for a couple of minutes because of thrust vectoring nozzle.
@srinitaaigaura
@srinitaaigaura Год назад
No point in making the aircraft more and more agile while the same old missiles get used. Why not put thrust vectoring on the missiles and let the plane fire them 360 degrees in any direction. That tech already exists but a lot can be upgraded.
@Nightsight971
@Nightsight971 Год назад
@@srinitaaigaura check out the mutant missile in development.
@wstavis3135
@wstavis3135 Год назад
​@@srinitaaigaurathrust vectoring is already on missiles. Both Russian and American missiles have it and when the Soviet Union fell, it was one of the surprises that our defense industry learned as they gained samples of missiles to test and reverse engineer.
@FloridaManMatty
@FloridaManMatty Месяц назад
They REALLY need to make the adaptive cycle engines a top priority. Pratt and Whitney’s proposed upgrades are a superb stop gap to keep the F-35 improving incrementally (as it SHOULD be), but the ACE, whoever ultimately produces it first, will be a HUGE leap forward for whoever gets it right.
@legallyfree2955
@legallyfree2955 Год назад
I saw both the F-35 and the F-22 fly recently at the Avalon Air Show. For airshow performance doing crazy maneuvers F-22 definitely still wins, and it looks better, but this thing is still pretty cool to watch. I dont think the enemy (Russia/China) has much of anything that will compete in the real world if we can get decent numbers of F-35, but it seems the higher generation of aircraft we build the less of them we get, can 1 F-35 defeat 10 of whatever the opponent sends up? I dont know, but I dont think it's impossible.
@Nightsight971
@Nightsight971 Год назад
That reminds me of a great quote a WW2 German Tanker made "One of our Tiger's was as good as 10 Sherman's. The problem was there was always 11 Sherman's".
@gikigill788
@gikigill788 Год назад
The F22 is a surgeons scalpel, expensive and maintenance hungry but you won't see it coming and it will bleed you silently. The F35 is a much cheaper sledgehammer, not as refined or sophisticated but will gladly smash anything that has the misfortune to encounter it.
@jaggerpirtle3766
@jaggerpirtle3766 Год назад
We’ve already built a thousand F-35s, with orders of about 2,000 total F-35s in the US alone. The US has 700 already. I estimate ~3000 total F-35s fielded by the US and it’s Allies. That’s about triple the total of F-15s. Not a small amount of planes at all. For comparison, Russia has 78 fifth gen fighters in order with ~20 built, and China has built ~200 J-20s. Not sure how many they have ordered, but nonetheless they will be greatly outnumbered by the US and Allies.
@legallyfree2955
@legallyfree2955 Год назад
@@jaggerpirtle3766 Your correct for the USA, when I said "we" i meant us here in Australia, I think we are going from about 150 frontline fighter type aircraft with the F18 and F111 together down to 75 ish for the F35, however in googling numbers to reply to you I discovered we also have 24 Super Hornets and 12 growlers that are probably not going to get retired soon so that will give us over 100 fighting aircraft so not as bad as I thought, thought still a little less than I think we used to have. But yeah, long story short I was wrong i should have googled that before typing it, I thought we were going from 150 to 75 aircraft for some reason but that is not the case.
@IrishCaesar
@IrishCaesar Год назад
1 F-35 and 10 F-16 beat the fuck out of 20 F-16s
@Grumman-8k
@Grumman-8k 5 месяцев назад
The block 4 f35 is probably not designed to counter 5th gen fighter, but for 6th gen, it’s basically a 5.5 gen fighter that offers decent weigh aganist a 6th gen monster
@phantom7531
@phantom7531 Год назад
Man, i hope they get those new engines they sound amazing, but if not, I hope the ngad platforms will get them, at least. But in all reality, the f35 needs them for range and power to run everything they want to run. So I hope they don't cheapen out on it. And can I say it's about time that f35 will be able to get the meteor on board iv been waiting a while to see that happen and with all their new and upcoming missiles their going to be something serious to deal with? I can't wait to see what this new rendition of the f35 can do sounds awesome though.
@invertedv12powerhouse77
@invertedv12powerhouse77 Год назад
Theyll be getting one of them tbats pretty much certain
@Rightin02
@Rightin02 Год назад
Thanks Alex. Awesome info, editing and pace.
@blackhornetf
@blackhornetf 8 дней назад
What some people dont understand is that when it comes to the budget of the F-35 program, is that it's 3 different aircraft for 3 different branches of the military. So the budget is bigger x3 to accommodate all the aircraft and different requirements. If the military had to fund 3 totally different aircraft for 3 separate branches of their military and upgrade each custom model made by different companies, then add all 3 different programs together the price of the F-35 program would be very small in comparison.
@pastorrich7436
@pastorrich7436 Год назад
Upgrades. Reminds me of a project I worked on for the MoD where the platform ran on Windows XP and EOL hardware. This was in the middle of the last decade. Good show Alex - very informative as usual!
@ravener96
@ravener96 Год назад
Its absurdly difficult to certify software for these stringent requirements. Its almost never worth the effort to replace something that works.
@granatmof
@granatmof Год назад
@@ravener96 not just in defense, but anything where software certification and validation means the difference of billion dollar budgets. Corporations, labs, infrastructure. You name it, and it's been around for a while, there's old software running in the background.
@br0k3nman
@br0k3nman Год назад
@@granatmof you said it. I’ve worked with cancer treatment radiotherapy systems. The front end had high end cpu and GPU computation suites. But the robots and controllers still ran on a pentium 2 era motherboard and Linux v1 kernel. But that was good enough because they were hardened for radiation and to keep the actuators and motors running with commands from the complex system. One of the most advanced robotics corporations in the world was using and sourcing ancient computer hardware because the certification procedure wasn’t worth it when the old stuff worked fine and was plentiful, and they even had it in the plan to buy from eBay and surplus govt/corp sales then certify in house to continue the life of their existing robotics systems. Crazy, but real and makes sense.
@Bobby-fj8mk
@Bobby-fj8mk Год назад
@@ravener96 _ I know how difficult it is to certify new firmware for commercial airliners. They must be cutting corners in the military to make such major changes so fast.
@ravener96
@ravener96 Год назад
@@Bobby-fj8mk in the f35? its been flying for close to twenty years, i dont think there's any corner cutting on that ship.
@FoxtrotYouniform
@FoxtrotYouniform Год назад
I saw somewhere recently that the newest F35s had enough spare power capacity to power the newest generation of 50 kilowatt lasers. I doubt they're miniaturized enough to fit into a pod yet, but if that is the case then I wonder if a short range smaller kilowatt laser anti-missile Point Defense pod may find its way onto the F35 soon.
@Valen-vl5ds
@Valen-vl5ds Год назад
Look up Lockheeds LANCE system. its laser weapon Pod that they delivered to the airforce last year
@FoxtrotYouniform
@FoxtrotYouniform Год назад
@@Valen-vl5ds well there ya go. Geeze, if it works as it seems like it should, that is a seismic shift in how air warfare is conducted. I dare say it might feel like a dreadnought moment for air combat.
@thuydoan7496
@thuydoan7496 Год назад
No, I highly doubt that. The F-35 was originally not built with laser weapons in mind. I believe the NGAD fighter jet will have a 1st Gen laser weapon onboard because I heard that it will be bigger than the F-35. The lasers will probably be used to take out enemy missiles.
@dpwellman
@dpwellman Год назад
If not, we'll always have Ill-tempered sea bass to fall back on....
@FoxtrotYouniform
@FoxtrotYouniform Год назад
@@dpwellman are they at least _particularly_ ill tempered?
@Kryptix0III
@Kryptix0III Год назад
Justin Trudeau delaying the purchase of F-35's was a blessing in disguise... the 88 F-35's bought by Canada this year are getting these block 4 upgrades.
@pigidly
@pigidly Год назад
He got lucky… also paying wayyy more
@bobjohnson3940
@bobjohnson3940 Год назад
Beautiful machine.
@maryrafuse3851
@maryrafuse3851 Год назад
Canada is upgrading some of its CF-188's with new radar and other very advanced equipment. These likely will be from the Australian airframes she purchased. While also placing the order for the first 16 of 88 CF-35a's. The vastly upgraded Hornets will serve in the north where it is good to have the second engine and also serve as a base line to judge the advanced CF-35's performance. Canada may also choose to designate her F-35's as the CF-355a's.
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 Год назад
Canada has no airbase in north, they are stationed either at Halifax or Vancouver. And for the single engine comment, Gripen and F-16 are both single engine and have been operating in the artic nicely.
@andrewolejarz5293
@andrewolejarz5293 Год назад
@Niwesh Lekhak stop spewing garbage. The f35s won't be in Halifax OR Vancouver
@JollyOldCanuck
@JollyOldCanuck Год назад
@@niweshlekhak9646 Are you confusing the navy with the air force? The RCAF's primary bases are in Cold Lake Alberta and Bagotsville Quebec.
@niweshlekhak9646
@niweshlekhak9646 Год назад
@@JollyOldCanuck yeah I think I kinda did.
@mandtgrant
@mandtgrant Год назад
Canada is buying them for the airframe: they were given upgraded electronics at the same time Australia did. They just needed some lower time airframes to keep them in service longer
@longliveliberty2257
@longliveliberty2257 Год назад
Those none f22 fighters participating in this exercise are fighting ghosts.
@dougware
@dougware Год назад
I love your videos. An increase of 5 to 20 is 400%, not 75%.
@michaelbeloff3505
@michaelbeloff3505 Год назад
Good catch! It is much more impressive indeed.
@davidp4427
@davidp4427 Год назад
Perhaps a 300% increase??? An increase of 100% would be going from 5 to 10.
@dougware
@dougware Год назад
@@davidp4427 You are right, 300% increase or 400% of the original. Have a great weekend.
@LRRPFco52
@LRRPFco52 Год назад
There are 11 RF sensors currently for the EW suite, one of which is also a highly-capable jammer/multifunction array AESA. Maybe they meant 5 types of sensors since there are multiples of some located on the wing leading edges, trailing edges, and horizontal stabilizer edges.
@granatmof
@granatmof Год назад
@@dougware % difference is a really ugly mess of communication.
@dictatorofthecheese
@dictatorofthecheese Год назад
First video I've seen of yours. Not that knowledgeable about what a block chain or any of the seriously technical stuff you mentioned, but when you put it in simple terms I understood it. I think as I watch more of your videos I'll start to understand more. Really enjoyed this. Subscribed!! 😍
@DemsRNutless
@DemsRNutless 8 месяцев назад
Putting a rocket-level engine on this beast makes it beyond insane.
@BubbafromSapperton
@BubbafromSapperton Год назад
I wouldn't want to be on the receiving end! 🤗
@WasabiSniffer
@WasabiSniffer Год назад
With such upgrades I can’t imagine what kind of already integrated, endogenous systems exist on the B21 or what capabilities the NGAD/FXX can casually promise. Side note, I like the shorts but of course they can’t replace the long-form videos
@jonaboy3
@jonaboy3 Год назад
it's basically an F35 with no dog fighting and more payload. probably much of the same software & capabilities.
@AverageJoe-ku9dc
@AverageJoe-ku9dc Год назад
Your math is wrong on the 75% increase in radar detectors. Logic check, if you start with 5 and add 5 more, that is a 100% increase. So if you added 15 more that is a 300% increase because you are adding 3 times more the original amount.
@Zero8880
@Zero8880 Год назад
The F35 is such a gorgeous fighter jet. I'm currently playing Ace Combat 7 and am grinding missions so I can unlock it! That game is so much fun when you are playing with a flightstick and throttle.
@twistedneck
@twistedneck Год назад
I can't wait for this beast!!! it really does need that extra cooling offered by GE's engine. Can Pratt provide the extra cooling?
@armchairgeneral7557
@armchairgeneral7557 Год назад
I don’t think they can with current engine. They also have an engine similar to GE that is under development has third stream the pentagon designated xa101 that is competing with GE xa100. I understand the third stream is key to cooling. So yes they can provide it, but it is a brand new engine. I think GE has the edge if it came to engine replacement because they have already stated that their engine fits in all three f-35 variants. The marines would absolutely love that with the b model.
@twistedneck
@twistedneck Год назад
@@armchairgeneral7557 I think they key to this program is still the F35B, that's the special sauce that makes this program so great and to give that a massive boost via the GE A100 would be a multiplier for the other variants. F35B with the A100 would be frightening to the PLAA. string a bunch of Stingray's and watch this thing sink half the CCP fleet.
@DAAllan82
@DAAllan82 Год назад
Range improvements are even more important. 35% is MASSIVE, especially when we are looking at China as the real threat.
@twistedneck
@twistedneck Год назад
@@DAAllan82 i wonder if its going to be looked at as worth the extra 4.3 Billion and almost a year delay? I'd say yes because it gives you access to range and directed energy weapons these two things are the most important when it comes to China.
@guanjun1178
@guanjun1178 Год назад
I initially didn't like the plane, but it's a beast, no question. 1:07
@grey5135
@grey5135 Год назад
I wish they would make a 5th Gen F-14 Tom-Cat & F-15 Eagle....then I could die happy
@spackle9999
@spackle9999 Год назад
F-15EX is a beast.
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 Год назад
I am not a fan of the 35. I was at Edwards Air Force Base during the testing. I'm glad to see the 35 finally gets it's just. With block 4, the 35 will be closer it what it was originally designed.
@chaosXP3RT
@chaosXP3RT Год назад
It's American Propaganda. Su-57 is far superior
@granatmof
@granatmof Год назад
@@chaosXP3RT hilarious either way
@mralmnthwyfemnin5783
@mralmnthwyfemnin5783 Год назад
Wow! Never thought of the F35 receiving an upgrade this soon.
@TheNucMed
@TheNucMed Год назад
Constantly evolving. That is the beauty of this AC. Mostly, plug it in, upload, test...done.
@nerdwatch1017
@nerdwatch1017 Год назад
I’ve had a couple make a wishes because I was born with a rare tough disability. If I got another if I wanted to go flying in an F35 for 10-20 minutes would they allow that? Like can they fly it like a drone with me inside it?
@gordonbergslien30
@gordonbergslien30 Год назад
There are several businesses around the world that will take you for a spin in a jet trainer or fighter, "just search fly a jet fighter." Understand that these flights are very pricey. The F-35 is not on the menu and won't be since no two seat models were (or will be) produced. The answer to your second question is a hard "no."
@MeanLaQueefa
@MeanLaQueefa Год назад
Unfortunately it’s a 1 seater
@davidlambert1102
@davidlambert1102 Год назад
I'll bet there will be a 3D simulator soon, if not already in existence, that you wouldn't know the difference between it and the real thing that you could give you a very satisfying experience.
@nerdwatch1017
@nerdwatch1017 Год назад
@@davidlambert1102 tbh if i could do this or go up in one of space x crew dragon ships I’d choose that
@daveoatway6126
@daveoatway6126 Год назад
Great job AF! The modular design of the F35 allows the enhancements without developing a new air frame. Steps beyond Tesla's over-the-air updates and superior to older platforms!
@russelljohnson6243
@russelljohnson6243 10 месяцев назад
Tesla?
@Lalmalsawma_C
@Lalmalsawma_C 2 месяца назад
I like Alex Hollings. His contents and info are reliable and upto date. Keep up the good work my man we appreciate you. On a side note please know that you inspire a lot of us to pay intetest into defence matters. Good luck.
@OathTaker3
@OathTaker3 Год назад
I wonder... Why not make stealth missiles that could be carried under wing or perhaps partially submerged into the wing or just smaller missiles that could fit in the wing. Anyway I'm sure it isn't easy to do but adding firepower is paramount.
@bighands69
@bighands69 Год назад
It is possible that they have but it is more about how the missile sits on the underbody or wing rather than the actual shape of the missile.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD Год назад
Stealth is based on absorbing and redirecting energy. Reflecting radar into the big nothing prevents the signal from being picked up. If a stealth missile reflects radar to the aircraft, and the aircraft reflects towards the missile, more energy bounces back to the radar receiver.
@danielloustaunau467
@danielloustaunau467 Год назад
they got mini missles but they could use extra rocket engine
@socratesa2536
@socratesa2536 Год назад
Simply put, adding anything to the external stores, even if it’s designed with stealth, decreases the stealth performance of the aircraft as it will increase the radar cross-section.
@jonathanpfeffer3716
@jonathanpfeffer3716 Год назад
They actually have. Modifications to the Sidewinder were carried out to make the AIM-9X Block II+ more stealthy when mounted on the wingtips, to the point where it will have a very negligible impact on the F35s frontal RCS, although from side aspects it will increase its RCS by a somewhat appreciable amount.
@ashhawk7489
@ashhawk7489 Год назад
This new package has to have a lot of the CCPs user military specialists sweating bullets
@ashhawk7489
@ashhawk7489 Год назад
Also makes you wonder what they are cramming into the NGAD (hope I got acronym rite).
@mill2712
@mill2712 Год назад
They're like "Han! We got to get the spies ready stat!"
@georgepalmer5497
@georgepalmer5497 Год назад
The F35 is expensive? There is nothing more expensive than having a second best air force.
@kathrynck
@kathrynck Год назад
Under the rather unfortunate "build while designing" notion, block 4 is essentially what would normally be considered the completed "version 1". TR-3 and anything beyond block 4.0 are ideas and upgrades which go beyond the preproduction design expectation. Based on how the plane is designed to work, the EOTS upgrade is likely _more_ important than the radar upgrade. LPI radar is nice, but EOTS is the bread & butter of the F-35 in hostile airspace. In hostile airspace the radar upgrade will likely be more about it's passive array, ELINT, and EW capability (which granted, IS a huge part of the F-35's mind-boggling toolset). Worth pointing out the XA-100 doesn't actually offer +25% thrust. It would give 45,000 lbs of max thrust, while "current" production engines for the F-35 already offer 44,000 (with some tweaks looking at 48,000). But the GE engine does open up supercruise, because it's a 3-step engine instead of a 2-step. In stage 2 (out of 3) the adaptive cycle engine would allow for sustained supercruise (a feature which fell by the wayside with weight-bloat). The +25% range isn't "free" it comes at the cost of cruising speed. But it is very useful for situations where range is valued over speed. Basically its stage 1 for +25% range, stage 2 for supercruise at present range, or stage 3 for max thrust which is on par with the current production version of the P&W f135 engine. I don't know if the XA-100 has growth potential like the PW F135 did (going from 38,000 to 44,000 max thrust, and potential for up to 48,000). It may actually have slightly less max thrust. But the promise of supercruise without afterburner, or 25% greater range, is 'very' interesting. Engines are an ongoing & recurring cost though. Not a 'one & done' upgrade cost. They figure prominently in the "per flight hour" expense. I'm curious what GE can get the price down to.
@piotrd.4850
@piotrd.4850 Год назад
Still, GE engine - if meets stated specs - will offer FAR MORE FLEXIBILITY in mission planning.
@kathrynck
@kathrynck Год назад
@@piotrd.4850 Oh, very much so. It's easily more desirable than (possibly) slightly more max thrust from the PW F135 engine. Assuming it can be made cost effective, and extremely reliable. PW F135 does have great reliability (apart from a few snafus where they were tinkering to eek more thrust out of it). I don't think the F-35 _needs_ all that much max thrust though. It's really designed to deconstruct the whole "dogfighting" dynamic. Being within 40km of an F-35 is a deeply unsafe place to be, even if you're behind it (assuming it still has AIM-120's left). 360 degrees of EOTS... the operative letter most don't appreciate is the "T", targeting. HMDS+HOBS+EOTS+30G missiles with high hit probability = dogfights will never look the same. And it's thrust to weight ratio or wing loading is not nearly as bad as it looks on paper, when you consider that it basically has the fuel capacity equivalent of "drop tanks", but on the _inside_ instead of added on like other planes do. If you look at thrust to weight with say 300nm worth of fuel on board, it stops looking overweight. I work for "the other guys", and the F-22 being picked over the YF-23 was bs. But they hit a home run with the F-35. The X-32 just wasn't on par.
@ASQUAREDX9
@ASQUAREDX9 Год назад
The world is about to understand why America doesn’t have universal healthcare 😂
@BradleyMichaels-b4u
@BradleyMichaels-b4u 3 месяца назад
The fact that you're able to write that in English, you should thank a soldier.
@alst4817
@alst4817 2 месяца назад
@@BradleyMichaels-b4uhuh?
@dreaminknight
@dreaminknight Месяц назад
​@@BradleyMichaels-b4u😂 nice joke.
@stephenlege5452
@stephenlege5452 27 дней назад
1947 meeting at lake Placid New York set the stage for the US geopolitical posture
@willymac5036
@willymac5036 23 дня назад
We don’t have universal healthcare, but we have universal unhealthcare!
@cgctorrag
@cgctorrag 10 месяцев назад
The 'modularity' capacity of the 35 has been undervalued from Day 1. Also the powerplant was always just good not great.
@jasestrong
@jasestrong Год назад
Awesome content sir! You deliver!
@ronjon7942
@ronjon7942 Год назад
If it’s successful ? The ‘if’ ship has sailed, the F-35 is a stunning success. As far as the tax payers go, practically all tnat money went right back into the economy along with jobs all over the country. A heckuva lot better than a stimulus check, with the added benefit of having an outstanding military asset - not too dissimilar to funding massive infrastructure projects. Not to mention the technology and production capability transfers to our allies, as producing parts for the F-35 helps maintain their aerospace companies, along with exporting the aircraft to our allies, generating revenue for the US and increasing NATO and our Asian allies security and war fighting capability. I know, pretty over the top, but despite the fanboy I am, I’m not entirely wrong. I certainly don’t mind my tax dollars funding the program. But then, I’m still hoping we reopen the production line for our once promised 750 Raptors.
@DinoNucci
@DinoNucci Год назад
I have a bridge to sell you
@randomuser6306
@randomuser6306 11 месяцев назад
20 receivers is an upgrade of 300% from 5 receivers, not 75%. Math is hard.
@bartvandenhaute4019
@bartvandenhaute4019 Год назад
Can’t wait for the f35 to arrive in my country, Belgium. Normally this year the first few should arrive, finally. Hopefully they will also have some of these upgrades although I doubt it.
@Michael-ji3gw
@Michael-ji3gw Год назад
Are they retrofitting all of the older models?
@orlock20
@orlock20 Год назад
Probably not. Aircraft have a life expectancy because the air frames wears out due to stress. The air frames are suppose to last 8,000 hours. In non combat of two hours per day, that's about 11 years. Combat will shorten the number of days due to the planes flying a lot more hours per day. New F-35s will be rolling out until the 2040s.
@bushcraft4life964
@bushcraft4life964 Год назад
Love your content, nice to hear someone speak about our military with such enthusiasm & knowledge. Thanks for sharing bro.
@TheNucMed
@TheNucMed Год назад
Refreshing for sure.
@kylek29
@kylek29 Год назад
What's funny is that 35x to 75x process power increase isn't all that impressive if you look at a processing power chart (general compute). Given they probably spec'd those 20 years ago to where we are now .. passmark has the avg desktop compute score having increased ~77x (as in, an avg 2023 CPU can do 77 times a 2005). Obviously they're not going to be slapping a desktop processor in there, but these things tend to scale together because it's more about the advancement on the manufacturing nodes.
@RichardHennigan
@RichardHennigan Год назад
They're going to slap a 4090 in there and play DCS on the MFDs.
@wowTasteThis
@wowTasteThis Год назад
These aren't average CPUs though. Consumer CPU increases happen rapidly since there's a shit ton of money to be made.
@saquist
@saquist Год назад
Apparently Tesla's Full Self Driving Computer in each car is 180 times more powerful than the out going F35 computer. Lockheed and Boeing are having the same problems as Legacy Auto. They outsource the processors and the software and which results in considerable difficulty in getting different software to speak to each other. When one changes you have to get permission or ask for the company to make changes to the other...that's almost always because you don't have good software developers on your own payroll (as we saw with the F35 software issues early on) They clearly had no idea what Mass Production would need software wise.
@kevinbudge106
@kevinbudge106 Год назад
The GE engine is the real story i cant believe that there considering P&W
@michaelbeloff3505
@michaelbeloff3505 Год назад
Having worker for both engine manufacturers companies, I would say that they should consider both, with GE as a second.
@SephirothRyu
@SephirothRyu Год назад
Want to make it a pure AWACS? Shove its payload full of tanks, and its beast mode full of drop tanks.
@icare7151
@icare7151 Год назад
Fuel economy Range needs to be increased.
@thefrogking481
@thefrogking481 Год назад
MPG is not what this beast does.
@Just_A_Random_Desk
@Just_A_Random_Desk Год назад
​@@thefrogking481 It needs to be though. China's ever increasing anti-ship bubble a massive risk.
@ChucksSEADnDEAD
@ChucksSEADnDEAD Год назад
​@@Just_A_Random_Desk loyal wingman tankers will give it legs.
@Justanotherconsumer
@Justanotherconsumer Год назад
The new engine apparently improves fuel economy in meaningful ways.
@jackryan6446
@jackryan6446 Год назад
@@Just_A_Random_Desk Hopefully they select the GE adaptive cycle engine for this. Commonality with NGAD when deployed to the pacific will be a plus.
@vanguard9067
@vanguard9067 Год назад
Can the F-35 fulfill air superiority, interception, and CAS roles? Curious. Thanks.
@yuritarted984
@yuritarted984 Год назад
Yh
@psychohist
@psychohist Год назад
CAS yes.
@kingqw3rty-_-982
@kingqw3rty-_-982 Год назад
Yes
@LoisoPondohva
@LoisoPondohva Год назад
Yes, and it doesn't have foreign competition in any of those roles.
@jimw1615
@jimw1615 Год назад
It's an extremely expensive platform for Close Air Support, but it was done with the F-4 Phantom when it was the dominate fighter of its day.
@-__Shadow__-
@-__Shadow__- Год назад
As a tech enthusiast this is cool. As an aircraft mechanic, I still mock the jet for its poor performance and the idea they tried to use one airframe with 3 variations for multiple purposes. An aircraft that is designed for everything does it all mediocre. The only good thing is the tech, they tried to make the thing do too much.
@quacksly509
@quacksly509 Год назад
Its performance in red flag has been outstanding, its versatility is unmatched, and it can shoot pretty much any enemy plane out of the sky for cheaper then most of our other western planes. Seems like a resounding success.
@kennethhopson5013
@kennethhopson5013 Год назад
I'm well pleased that the government is upgrading the F22 Raptors and the F35 along with a few more of the fighter jets.
@drmarkintexas-400
@drmarkintexas-400 Год назад
Thank you for sharing 🎖️🏆🇺🇲🙏
@Connor_Roush
@Connor_Roush Год назад
Is this upgrade across the 3 variant? A, B & C?
@user-os6ch5pt7w
@user-os6ch5pt7w Год назад
yes.
@sethadkins546
@sethadkins546 Год назад
He mentions this in the video, it could be its own designation
@franknada8235
@franknada8235 Год назад
This is like people being orgasmicly stoked about a Windows update from 10 to 11. 🙄 How amazing!!!!!
@icare7151
@icare7151 Год назад
Very well stated. They need to update a near maintenance free stealth coating system of which I am familiar with, that would be awesome.
@israel963
@israel963 Год назад
Ok distributed aperture/distributed aperture on fighter planes is kind of cool… Same stuff as SARSat and imaging black holes. That’s just a massive win.
@topfeedcoco
@topfeedcoco Год назад
@5:38 Not so good with math and percentages there Alex? "20 is a 75% increase over today's 5" Are today's 5s not the same absolute value as tomorrows 5s? Where I'm from 20 is a 400% (edit: 300% - As corrected by Joshua - I'm tarded too) increase over 5.
@QTPewPew
@QTPewPew Год назад
20 is a 300% increase. You have to subtract 5 from 20 to get the increase. 400% of the original, but only a 300% increase over the 100% that was there.
@dennisschluttenhofer4321
@dennisschluttenhofer4321 Год назад
I caught that too. Similarly, @4:10 75% Cost Reduction is - we was going to save $100/unit but now we are only going to save $25/unit - likely the exact opposite of what is meant.
@topfeedcoco
@topfeedcoco Год назад
@@QTPewPew Indeed. Durrp I knew if I started smart mouthing I'd get hoisted on my own petard! 😄
@zzzetsulive
@zzzetsulive Год назад
Nothin but us humming birds flying at mach 2 lol
@Sunflowrrunner
@Sunflowrrunner Год назад
I'm glad we're protecting ourselves against theoretical enemies instead of fighting hunger in schools.
@valentindegen
@valentindegen Год назад
The people of Switzerland approved & can‘t wait! 🇺🇸 🤝🇨🇭
@scottlink183
@scottlink183 6 месяцев назад
Over a year and still waiting for the F-35 “Monster Upgrade”
@llamudos9809
@llamudos9809 Год назад
Agile development is expensive initially but the benefit of using this way to manage fighter manufacture provides so much data and future ability to produce far faster and far more effective systems. The knowledge and capability increases not just for the f-35 but any future fighter jets that can far faster develop in the future rather than starting from scratch. People just do not realise this. The cost of future fighters are already going to be cheaper because of the data gathered from the f-35 programme. Many existing jets will also utilise the benefits developed with the f-35 programme (e.g stealth coating being one) GE sounds amazing 20-25% increase in thrust and distance thats impressive! When your hear about new tech like fluidic thrust vectoring on the NGAD and self repairing systems & wings that are modular and adaptable with multiple system built into the wing (sensors, Stealth, Comms, Energy weapons, scanning, Optical data recognition, Laser weapons internal weapons systems with AI able to take control of the fighter or a person remotely its feels like star trek technology!
Далее
Watermelon magic box! #shorts by Leisi Crazy
00:20
Просмотров 3,7 млн
Su-57 - Russia's 5th Gen Fighter
17:53
Просмотров 204 тыс.
What Is Reality?
2:32:23
Просмотров 2,5 млн
MiG-31 - Secrets of the Supersonic Assassin
36:19
Просмотров 58 тыс.
Offsetting China's stealth fighter ADVANTAGE
24:46
Просмотров 323 тыс.
Lockheed Martin (Audio)
3:38:38
Просмотров 94 тыс.