It's super interesting to look back on how government tried to keep companies from being vertically integrated, while now a days we have Amazon that controls literally every aspect of the company. Amazon has their own airline, planes, trucks, delivery vehicle and people, warehouses, cargo containers, and even rents out whole ships. Only thing they don't own is a railroad.
@@krozareq Actually, cloud computing is Amazon's major source of revenue at the moment and the foreseeable future. Personally, I find it extremely disturbing that the Pentagon came EXTREMELY close to awarding this mammoth conglomerate a contract for cloud services.
More disturbing is that the modern tech giants like Amazon and Google do not even consider themselves "American" companies and will gladly do business with horrible overseas regimes for enough money. In their day companies like Santa Fe were staffed with patriotic war vets or their relatives, companies like Amazon are staffed by tech geeks brainwashed at college to abstain from military service and to believe that America is racist and backwards, while their bosses are hideously rich and powerful.
This guy is a true RU-vid historian. Content is the gold bar, narration doesn't put me to sleep, visuals are better than history or discovery channel. Just a great channel. Wishing you many subs
he is underrated because mostly unknown as we like this channel we need to share its fabulous content to suscitate more views in order to satisfy the algorithm and gave the guy behind it and the people who help him the recognition they deserve
Its really interesting how railroads were turned down so frequently to join the air industry. I think Santa Fe Skyway could have become a big player in the air freight industry if they were allowed to become common carriers.
I wonder if the ATB was right, in the end. That line at the end about how the ATSF was worth more than the entire air freight industry was spooky, not the least of which because railroads are notorious for trying to bury competition once they get a hold on things. In an alternate reality, this would be the tipping point where home-grown common carriers went extinct, to be subducted by railroad-backed giants.
My Dad worked for the Post Office for 40 years. He said: "There were many ways to save money at the United States Postal Service, but the USPS always chose the politically correct solution over the better and cheaper one."
I've tried watching _other_ documentaries on youtube. I swear the longest clip on some of them is no more than two seconds, with most 1 to 1.5. There's no time to LOOK at anything without constantly pausing and breaking up the audio. The frenetic pacing they use can be very frustrating. I have never felt that frustration watching your videos, and I think that's one reason I enjoy them so much. Thank you for not treating us like sugar-buzzed three-year-olds.
@@peterdibble People do all sorts of stuff that's an Editing 101 no-no. Overlays with spelling and punctuation mistakes, or are not up long enough to actually read (the rule is, the average reader should be able to read it TWICE. yup.). Nice to see well researched and edited material here.
Worst are most military documentaries, which show MANY clips that are short because otherwise you'd recognize that it is the wrong plane, tank or whatever in the clip or completely unrelated battle footage and you see clips repeated MULTIPLE times. The BEST war documentaries available are by Montemayor, who uses simple animations and authentic clips to give you a CLEAR understanding of important battles. Pearl Harbor, Coral Sea and 3 part Midway give clarity to these major events in history.
It’s interesting to note that in Canada, both the Canadian National and Canadian Pacific had their own airlines (Trans-Canada Airlines → Air Canada & Canadian Pacific Airlines → CP Air). And during the 1960’s, Penn Central got nailed by the ICC for illegally operating an executive private jet charter service…
I totally agree with Santa Fe on this one, they should've been allowed to fly. It really feels like the government introducing the law that said that applicants under review could operate as common carriers except if they're already a railroad was the final nail in their coffin. They were singled-out, and it really felt like the US Government overstepped their bounds here. Imagine the innovation that we could've had if their plans had come to be... They seemed so forward thinking and willing to expand in a good way.
FedEx’s launch in 1973 was made possible by changing the relevant air carrier legislation, without that the business could not have been launched, they also would have been consigned to essentially air taxi operations
lots of cargo does ship on rails, just no generally anything you ship, because no, it would not be economical, or rather, it might be if that rail was not be put to better use transporting things that you generally don't want to be transported on busy roads. The split is almost firm or logical, but its exists. that said, I know amtrack (etc.) does some regular shipping, but mostly your packages are truck with a side of air.
@@larrybrennan1463 And the top bureaucrats at the time of denying Santa Fe were under the Truman administration, which was a continuation of the FDR administration, which was a reincarnation of the Wilson administration... Looking back with historical perspective, it was a long shot gamble by Santa Fe to try to get CAA licensing to operate...
The real problem with regulation was it was a lot easier to stop something then to start. When the transportation industry was (at least partially) deregulated, transport companies really took off.
Absolutely one of the most interesting videos I have seen in a long time. Especially since I previously had no idea about Santa Fe Skyway, and it's many innovations. Top notch reporting and content. Thank you!
Excellent video, shining the spotlight on a little-known piece of Santa Fe history. As it happens, Santa Fe was not the only North American railroad to go into the airline business. Canadian Pacific formed Canadian Pacific Airlines (which carried freight and passengers) in 1942 and operated until 1987 when it was merged into Canadian Airlines until that airline was absorbed into Air Canada in 2001. CP Air, as it came to be called, joined the railroad, CP Ships and CP Hotels as a comprehensive transportation company. While the Canadian government did not deny CP a license as the US did ATSF, it did limit which routes CP Air could fly, protecting Trans-Canada Air (ancestor of Air Canada) on the most lucrative routes. CP then pioneered routes from Vancouver to Asia and the Pacific as well as cities in Europe not served by TCA. In the US, CP served major cities on the West Coast from their operations center in Vancouver.
Fun fact Canadian National controlled TCA and up to 1978 successor Air Canada, when in that year AC became a full fledge crown corp which was privatized in 1987
It's incredible how the country post WWII turned its back on railroads. While policies can and have changed in many sectors - simple evolution - if FedEx wanted to buy/start a railroad, I bet they'd be allowed. Or if BNSF - Santa Fe's successor, wanted to start an airline, I bet they'd be allowed, too.
You do a wonderful job! This is a very interesting story that i would have never known about. I really enjoy what you do, and how you visually show what is happening. Also i would add that i especially appreciate the train content! Any further train videos would be awesome!
I just discovered this channel today and I gotta say I'm really impressed. The production value is great but the topics are well researched and accurate which is the most important factor for me. Excellent work! I look forward to exploring your library.
Your channel's quality is simply astounding, a true hidden gem amongst the riffraff and rubbish on RU-vid! This quality is near unparalleled and that thumbnail is great too! I'm so glad I found it!!!
Great video. A huge corporation at the time like Santa Fe started what could easily be a substantial air freight carrier and augmented by one of the largest railroad companies is a strategic stroke of genius that indeed would do the public at large a huge service at reasonable cost and efficiency. What an incredible shame that the US government would destroy this.
Well, Peter, you did it again. You don't upload often but, when you do, it's always been worth the wait. Obviously, your emphasis is on quality rather then quantity. Would that more RU-vidrs followed your example.
Classy editing, a variety of topics across all your videos, informative narration, very nicely done overall I must say. Seeing as this is the first time I can recall seeing your content, I must say I'm rather impressed and I look forward to checking out more. You've earned my sub, along with many others today I'm sure.
Hi Peter! This was very interesting for me as a train buff, and especially as a Santa Fe enthusiast. I would really encourage you to write a book about this subject (as well as the combined cross-country train and airline passenger service they had). I'm sure it would be a big hit among both air transport and railroad afficianados.
Great quality documentary! Excellent use of maps and beautiful vintage color footage at appropriate times, detailed research with well selected quotations, and upbeat period music too! I give this a hearty A+ all around! 😎
Thanks you for a presentation on Santa Fe Skyway, I had seen various short articles about this over the years but nothing in-depth like yours. In April of 1995 after a 22 year career with Hewlett-Packard came to an end I had the great privilege of working for the Santa Fe Railway as a telecommunications technician before that dark day five and a half months later in September of that same year when we merged with that patchwork of a railroad the Burlington Northern to become the BNSF which is currently owned by Warren Buffet’s Berkshire Hathaway Holdings. We Santa Fe people often referred to the new organization as the Big Nothing So Far of the Butt Nugget Santa Fe.
I thought this was going to be about the planes that substituted the Super Chief so the passengers could take the plane by day and the train at night but this was even more interesting than I anticipated. Great work!
Peter, an absolutely stellar production! I'm a huge fan of what was the best railroad in existence IMO, but I never even knew about Skyway. Thank you for making this wonderful documentary. Instant subscriber! People need to know about your channel so as to grow your subscriber count!
Wow! Never knew of this, or heard anything about it. Thanks for info and visuals. Just goes to show you; "preferential treatment" can be a deterent to innovation and progress!
It seems like only when other airlines complained (Juan Tripp?!) just 10 days later, after over a year of consideration, they were turned down. Hmm... Perhaps if the name had been different and there had not been such an obvious connection to Santa Fe, they might have been allowed an honest go of it? Not sure how real the fear of monopoly was. It wasn't until the '80's Ma Bell was broken up. And as a trucker, I'd have to argue that deregulation was a disaster generally speaking... a race to the bottom. As for innovation, who has refrigerated air service today? These guys really were thinking ahead! Well done, thank you for this video.
Winslow Arizona was also the location of one of the Santa Fe's Fred Harvey hotels, The La Posada. The hotel is still open and has been restored to its original greatness.
Never heard of this channel and I frequent like channels... Subbed, happily. Great presentation, and obvious time went into the research behind the subject. Thank you!
Very interesting story of one venture within the rail industry of which I was previously unaware, thank you for presenting it. Reminds me of when the Pennsylvania Railroad attempted to get into the PASSENGER airline business. If I recall correctly, the same cry of "Monopoly!" was used to helped put an end to that venture.
I believe it was not nearly as common to challenge the government back then as it is today. I believe they had a good case.. one probably worthy of taking all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary. On the flip side what if they were allowed in that market space. What would they be today? Would they have turned into some version of our current tech giants that short of complete abstinence individuals can not escape?
They may be SFSP or SFSPBN(Santa Fe Southern Pacific Burlington Northern). Probably just the "winner" of the countless mergers of the 1970s and 1980s of railroads, owned by Bershire Hathaway today.
These are the sort of questions that were going through my head as I put this together. There were strong arguments for letting Santa Fe move forward, but it's also not hard to imagine them growing into an Amazon situation.
This question also has a converse that was highlighted by one of the forward-thinking executives in this video: during the 70s, many railroads were going bankrupt due to much of their customer base switching from rail to trucking for transportation instead. It's not unfounded to think that if Santa Fe -- or other railroads for that matter -- had managed to operate a successful air freight business, that those funds couldn't have helped prop up their existing rail operations, potentially saving many from bankruptcy. In such a scenario, it's possible that the railroads might have been able to continue passenger rail service despite declining public interest due to car and air travel alternatives. Many people now lament the lack of any real passenger rail outside of Amtrak, so it's interesting to think what the effect on society could have been if passenger rail service was as plentiful as it had been before the invention of the automobile.
@@peterdibble ..Today the International tech giants use their intense influence over media, to elect powerful lawmakers, even manipulate the entire Washington DC control agenda. All done to ensure their continuance toward their goals. Stock portfolios, connected with future gains insider information, are obviously unenforced. Political affiliation loyalties are far stronger today, than at the higher morals time of 'Santa Fe Air Freight'. ;[
And now we seem to be moving in the opposite direction (sort of). After Pan Am went bankrupt, Guildford Rail (Maine and New Hampshire) bought the Pan Am name, logo, and other property. We now have a rail line sporting the historic Pan Am livery (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan_Am_Systems)
At that time a company having common carriage over routes and then serving those routes or that area with more than one method was considered to be an anti trust law violation. Same as Matson Airlines to Honolulu.
Sprint also started as an arm of Southern Pacific, specifically after realizing their internal telephone network had excess capacity (Southern Pacific Railroad Internal Network Telecommuncations) I think they spun it off while the rail side started going downhill (or maybe right before SPSF?) to generate extra cash. That might also be worth a video.
There was another similar Airline by the name of Zantop that operated under c a b Authority started at about the same time. I was a pilot for them back in the seventies. They started operating originally with c-46 condors. I would like to see a historical documentary about zantop. Thanks for that fine documentary on Santa Fe. I really enjoyed it
Interesting that in your closing you call it a “missed opportunity” but what I gathered from the rest of the context was more that they were screwed out of the opportunity. Anyways, I don’t know anything about these topics lol and just enjoy what I am learning about rail from your videos so far. Another good one!
"Santa Fe has been operating DC-3s and DC-4s between LA, Chicago and NY with such regularity as to constitute a common carrier operation" I am like yeah? So? With contract based operations you have a fixed term contracts, if the shipments are few but many, then yeah, you're going to have regular planes flying in and out of those airplanes at regular intervals. That's like business 101.
The paint job on the aircraft on your thumbnail looks very similar, if not identical, to the paint job on the aircraft that went down in the original "Flight of the Phoenix". Is that a coincidence?
This eerily reminds me of "Atlas Shrugged" where companies use the power of the government to squash upstart competitors. In this case other airlines vs. Santa Fe. The problem with these government rules "in the public interest" is that they have the potential to outlive their usefulness as times change. Over time these rules limit or put out of business that better, more efficient enterprise.
Excellent documentary on a little known history of the AT&SF, now BNSF. Their safety record screams of the care and concern Santa Fe exercised as an organization. Balancing overregulation with under regulation continues to challenge governing bodies today, as well.
Very interesting video. I never knew that the mighty Santa Fe had connections in the east coast. I still prefer good old rail transport though. Much more efficient in moving goods and people than any plane or truck ever will.
At one time the Santa Fe airway carried passengers on transcontinental hops I believe before World War 2. Also the Penn Central planned something similar, they had plans to buy 6 Lockheed C5 Galaxies to haul freight. The CAB turned them down also.
I wonder if it was just one of those 'robust conversations' that were had between lobbyist and the certification agencies behind closed doors. Or was it just some dumb incompetence, robbing us of 20 years of progress, before the likes of dhl or fedex. Thanks for the great banger of a video