@@NerdlySquared you absolutely nailed it. what appears to be for the public good but is actually in her interest. eg "being fat is beautiful! women should only date nice boys!" - meanwhile the individual woman is in the gym trying to look beautiful so she can pull Mike Tyson. imagine. if the other women are only mating with soft men while you're getting the DNA of killers... your offspring will dominate others'
Interesting discussion and its great some women are starting to be more introspective, but I challenge the idea that the "feminization" of institutions like the police has lead to "less police violence". If we're talking about the US police shootings are around the same every year. In fact police shootings have slightly increased since 2020. but its still around 1000-1100 per year, Now police are being killed at double the rates. Before 2020 average of 65 police were killed every year. Since 2020 around 130 police are killed every year.. The other problem is, the whole BLM/Democrat anti-police narratives lead to a 35% spike in murders in the African American community. as well as overall crime since 2020. That works out to around 3000 more AA deaths per year since 2020. We are also seeing stores closing across the US from rampant crime and mob shop robberies. The riots of 2020 have morphed into a crime spree and social unrest. This is getting little media attention. . So in this case the "feminization" of police has been a disaster for everyone, including (and particularly) for the people it was designed to help. Its interesting that police shootings became a major media focus in 2019-2020 when Trump was in office, but after Biden was elected in 2020, police shootings disappeared off the media radar, even though police shootings have slightly increased since 2020. People on the left often claim to be improving society but when you look at the facts and statistics, its often worse.
@@tubester4567 As the great C S Lewis said - ‘Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, but those that torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.’
I'm a male therapist. I can tell you that the vast majority of women in the field are part of why many men don't get positive results from or even interact with the mental health field. Not out of malice (many of my fenale colleagues genuinely work their butts off trying to help) but because of the innately different ways of interacting with the world.
Could you give an example of how a male vs female psychologist would react differently as a patient? I'm a prospective young man looking to go to a therapist but don't really know what to look for besides them being action orientated
@JL-ti3us ok, this is completely hypothetical and I'm not going to do the "a woman would do this but a man would do this" thing. Let's say you come in feeling worthless and unable to conduct basic functions daily. You haven't been able to enjoy things for 6 months of more (it's important for disgnosis). Many schools of therapy tell us what will resolve these issues is finding the root and helping you process your way through it until you integrate the thinking/feeling pattern into your daily thoughts. What I often find helps to make that doable is to build a sense of agency and competence so you can approach the things making you feel weak from a position of strength. I know this because of my own lived experience and while it's not "everybody else is wrong" it is a different approach from much of what traditional training teaches. Does that help?
If I were to see a therapist again I’d prefer to talk to a woman because I am one. We’re just different. I held back on things when talking to a male therapist and it’s not because I think he isn’t capable i just didn’t feel comfortable, like it felt inappropriate or something. It was sexual stuff.
All those qualities she described as ruining academia are terrific qualities for a mother… it’s almost like those traditions existed for tens of thousands of years for a reason or something
And there's a reason that the child leaves the mother behind (i.e., the system changes so the child can grow up in school, and then be productive in society later.) Need both parts, but at different times. I'm coming to this video after one about Avoidant Personalities, and I'm seeing a set of symptoms which suggest the traditional ways were more effective in making a solid society... Fortunately we don't need to go all the way back to Sparta, but we have definitely gone the wrong way, too far in a bad direction.
Right around the 33:30 mark, when they're talking about the instincts of male soldiers towards females in distress. I was an infantryman for twenty years, early in my career i was at a duty station that did a lot of support for military schools, one of which was the Basic Officer Leader Course, which was gender integrated even then. We were playing the opposing force, manning defensive positions for these trainees to attack. In addition to the normal gaffes trainees make, this cute little female got caught on the wire. No shit, there were at least a dozen guys surrounding her, trying to help her out, with as many more waiting in the wings. It was bad enough that their instructors went over to break the party up. Being from the all male infantry, we were standing there in disgusted amusement mocking them to the point the instructors came over and apologized. After they drag this hundred pound girl out of the wire, the instructors tell the student leadership to get accountability of people and equipment, in preparation to moving out. If you don't know, accountability is a core tenant of military service. Losing equipment is a nightmare, and losing people is about the worst thing you can do, which goes back to some of the earlier comments about men needing everyone they can in a group. The student leaders give a thumbs up that they have everyone. They start to move out, and we hear this lone voice yelling, "Hey!" From back in the woodline. A guy was stuck in the wire fifty yards back. Not only did they not help him out, they didn't even notice he was missing. Two dozen guys hovering over one female, and not a single battle buddy to help this cat out. Women pose an enormous problem to small unit formation, nevermind at the institutional level. Some people support it because of egalitarian ideas, some because it puts them in proximity to chicks they can sleep with. In both cases they ignore the potential impact on the purpose of the group in the first place. Low and behold, the same thing happenening in the academies. Pursuit of truth is giving way to secondary concerns. I don't think it's a coincidence.
This comment is exactly what happened to me but I’m the woman and it was in the carpenters union on the west coast where a black man was in charge and decided to “make an example” out of me. All these guys came over to try to “help” and were shewed away. And other men stood by to watch me and my partner struggle. And they too were shooed away, but slower. And I wound up injuring my back irrevocably bc I wouldn’t give in. The whole entire room stomped and clapped and hooted and hollered when I walked in after 2 days of this hazing. But my back was spent. And my lead at work saw me leaning over due to my back and he took me off the job after that. I was more trouble than I was worth. And absolutely NOT having anything to do with lack of work ethic….
I'm watching my own daughters traverse the minefield of 8,9,10,11,12,13 and it's a shock to me as somebody who came from a family of four boys. Girls are horrifically brutal in ways boys would not see as fiar. My wife, who incidentally works as a child psychologist, tells me that it's all pretty standard and expected behaviour.
As I am now aging out of the mating pool, and very happily and securely married, I find myself more willing to speak against the positions of women. But when I was younger, I was perhaps (wrongly?) afraid of spoiling the pool of potential candidates by speaking against fraught concepts such as 'The Patriarchy'. I was certainly more willing to speak against men than women, and/or being much more careful when speaking against women. And much more so if she was attractive. I know it was a real thing in high school to get 'blacklisted' from the dating pool by groups of women. So the fear was real. But, as women get older, they are less susceptible to those sorts of social pressure, and showing 'courage' in going against the grain and having personal integrity becomes a more cherished trait in men. Both men and women get better at detecting a valuable partner as they get older.
Male competitiveness and aggression can lead to great crimes, and it can also lead to great innovations and advancements that help society flourish, as history well attests. The same can be said of women's maternal instincts. In the proper context, which is in the domestic setting, such warmth and empathy is the bedrock by which we produce respectful and productive citizenry. In the wrong context, such as an in areas where getting the facts correct is paramount, such as in business and academia, it is a source of problems. We should not demonize either male or female proclivities, nor should we seek to change them. We should determine where one is appropriate and where one is not.
Yes. But to be careful that "We should determine" does NOT mean coercion/control eg. the government or other powers-that-be or rigid social strictures deciding who should do what, BUT RATHER meaning: maintain freedom of choice, maximize meritocracy with a limited social safety net to prevent people from falling out the bottom (for everyone's benefit) - and then individuals will sort themselves out in a modestly regulated market system centred around the institution of the 2-parent family.
Yes, Men and women are both human and therefore have brains that are able to adapt. None of us are robots running on gender-specific batteries. As a woman, I have to be analytical at work, which is great. I'm more feminine at home, which is great. It's called being human and having the human ability to adapt and change. And yes, society in all areas needs a balance of feminine and masculine traits to run well. We tend to be over-masculine, and when some feminine traits emerge, conservatives shriek that we're becoming feminized. We need to stop putting down femininity.
Tell me about it. When I was young, my mother used to say "I'm more of a man than most men I know." Now that I'm grown up, I know exactly what she meant.
Just curious, how so? I assumed it would be more comfortable than working with men since they’re competitive for promotions since they usually are the ones to provide for their families
@@britneyt9253I wonder if it’s one of those things akin to how men behave better/ are less aggressive to other men around women, maybe women are also less bitchy and toxic to other women when men are around?
@@britneyt9253my sister is a nurse and from what I’ve heard yeah it’s a lot of gossiping / bitchiness to each other and also competition for the favour of doctors … esp young single ones…
I’m male and used to work in an all girls school with a mostly female staff. New male staff were given a hard time by pupils and female staff, but ultimately many of the female staff thought the environment and culture was more healthy with men to work with, and with male as well as female role models for the students.
Dr. David Buss, one of the founders of the field of evolutionary psychology, said he was advised by a female professor not to publish the empirical findings that men prioritize physical attractiveness in female mate selection over any other trait and it's not just a social construction, but it underlies women's cues to health, youth and fertility. While Buss asked her what was the reason for her against publishing empirical findings, she said, "women had a hard enough time with intra-sexual competition with regards to physical appearance without being told men have this evolved preference for it. The standard social science model is more comfortable for people to believe it's just arbitrary and infinitely changeable". ru-vid.comUgkxqdrhSAbHgDXahKrQOMZApvLinXbgZTJl?feature=shared
@@Individual_Lives_Matter You could say she had cognitive distortions characterized by catastrophizing (publishing the findings would cause harm to women) and emotional reasoning (using her emotions as proof that the findings shouldn't be published).
The whole time she was talking about harm reduction I was thinking about the old football maxim, "All the prevent defense does is prevent you from winning."
Given the advancements in AI, will women's ascendancy and dominance in certain white collar domains be long lasting? It would seem, from my understanding of AI, the places where such technology will replace workers is in white collar work were women are the predominate gender. Things like accounting, copy editing, journalism, business analyst, etc, are the most likely jobs to be replaced by AI in the near future, while jobs that require mechanical skill - welders, plumbers, construction, etc - are the least likely jobs to replaced in the near future. These jobs are predominately occupied by men.
29:00 can’t help but wonder if we’re in a long process of coming to the conclusion that a separation/segregation of the sexes may be necessary for efficient functioning of society? Just putting it out there.
Feminist women think they would be fine without men, but that's only because they rely on men already. There is no parity between the sexes, whether we like it or not. That's just nature. If we split, women would suffer immensely under the weight of their own poor judgement. Men would adapt and ultimately succeed.
Cos she's a Feminist.. most efficient workplaces is all men, no complaining, nobody getting fired over a joke, more work done, less #metoo accusations, less feelings flying around, less time off@@grannyannie2948
The answer isn’t segregation. The answer is to go back to the natural hierarchy of the sexes. Man tames nature, woman tames man. We are not equals, but we are equally valuable.
Published STEM female here. I did science in the pursuit of truth. There are many excellent female scientists making significant strides and contributions in geology, physics, and other STEM fields in institutions around the world. You may want to look at cultural influence, as it is not uncommon to find a femal German engineer or female Russian computer programmer.
Btw the way you leave the spicy subjects for subscription is a good business model lol. I don’t even have a substack account I’m thinking about making one just to hear the extended parts of your episodes
and theyve given women power but no repercussions for bad behaviour - recipe for disaster, men dont wanna punish women ie treat them the same as men but wanna give them the same power as men
Authority must always equal responsibility or you can’t walk the rope. Women have too much authority without responsibility so they’re driving us off a cliff. Men have too much responsibility without enough authority so we can’t do anything about it.
The world of men can be cold. The world of women can be cloying. I have always preferred environments with a good blend of both. We balance each other out in a magnificent way x
The world of men is cold to women and the world of women is stifling to men. But men care more and so now the world is about to overheat and burn itself down.
Yes, society needs a balance of feminine and masculine traits, but on this video, it seem like they're saying that women are bad and that everything must be masculine. Society is masculine as it is. How's that working out?
Another very interesting interview, thanks! Informative, and a little bit distressing, if not frightening considering the importance of the subject. Anyway, keep doing what you're doing Mrs. Perry! These talks are always a pleasure to listen to, and there's not enough challenging but approachable content like that, not designed to swirl around the generation of controversy and sensationalism. Sadly, as digestible as it is, still internalizing it requires real thinking and effort, and when it comes to social media and modern audiences, anything of value is unrelentingly fighting upstream against multiple currents at the same time. Thanks for your work and presence and continuous efforts do radiate decency and reason.
Men let go of the reigns when they should have been using spurs and the hunter, due to this folly most wont see the otherside, are we smart enough to learn our lesson ? doubt it, the endless merry go round of civilization awaits the next rev.
30:26 Look at the failure of the education system now. Look at the superior results of single father homes versus single mother homes. Hyper-inclusivity and the move away from corporal punishment explains a lot. The describing of corporal punishment as harming children is incorrect.
Depends how old the child is. There's research stating that under the age of about 5 or 6, corporal punishment does long term brain damage to the child, making them more likely to experience depression in adulthood.
Nope. Corporal punishment is literally harming children directly obviously, but also harming them longer term. ie. Using fear and pain is wrong in it's own right, but it is also ineffective long-term. Exception: if you are trying to create simple obedient warriors, then this approach may work, but I'd argue that we want balanced individuals who don't prioritize aggression and violence and are free-thinking not just obedient - not just to maximize human welfare directly, but even as a strategic approach to reach objectives. It's easy to "get" a person to do anything by just applying enough pain/threat, that's why parents fall into the ineffective 'punishment trap' but it is more difficult to guide a person to proper behaviour. Love always first, discipline must be applied judiciously and appropriately. Set clear, consistent and age-appropriate boundaries and focus on positive reinforcement for any behavioural influence. Yes, aspects of "masculine" approaches that work well are simplicity, consistency, honesty, and objectivity etc.. You want to embody truth, discipline (discipline meaning internal motivation and good habits, not punishment) AND compassion and humility. If you are skeptical of what I'm saying to you here, stop for a moment and think about how my arguing with you feels, and if it's annoying or angering, how well does the negative (punishing) aspects of my pushback motivate you to do better, versus how well does the negative motivate you to think I'm sh t and look for ways to prove me wrong in return. Kids and adults respond the same.
@@chrishodgkinson3039 kids and adults do not respond the same. Discipline is on a different magnitude than abuse and does not leave lasting harm when done from love. The goal is the same, negative emotion. Discipline is a more quick event and lasting memory. When we removed it from much of society we had a massive onset of psychological problems.
Life often teaches us through fear and pain. this ideology that we should never discipline through negative methods ends up creating individuals who can’t cope with any negativity be it set backs, criticism, failures, disadvantages etc. Life is not fair and we are not guaranteed a nice warm experience. To be able to rise above these negativities that beset us sometimes through our own mistakes and sometimes just because that’s the way it is, is the mark of maturity, humility, patience, forbearance, all those virtues that are not fashionable anymore. These are the qualities that can help us find joy, love and peace in our life. We don’t necessarily learn them by having people trying not to hurt our feelings or ‘self-esteem’
I think ”male” and ”female” are complimentary. And while it might have been skewed ”male”, skewing it to the ”female” is probably not better. And as long as its viewed as a ”power struggle” we will not find what the proper balance is.
When it comes to organising society and infrastructure and rules, better to have men, who are more efficient and fair, women are only good at creating and maintaining life itself eg raising kids tbh, u know that thing they were designed to do? They have devalued that themselves but the instinct/natural proclivity to do it is still there, so they just fighting their own natures now, and fighting male nature too
It is strange how all the universities are promoting fascist ideologies about every relationship being about power. I am convinced that they are all useful idiots being tricked or paid by Chinese intelligence.
difference is those men may have hated certain groups like jews or kulaks, but Feminist ideology hate half the world (men), no other ideology comes close to being that destructive
Ha, yeah, I am not holding my breath until women begin designing institutions when it's just so much easier for women to shame men into letting them into the established and time tested institutions. What societal force has prevented women from raising their own armies? Or establishing their own legal systems?
Who wouldn't have more empathy for vulnerable groups and want to give them special treatment, when you are the vulnerable group who gets the special treatment?
That's kinda ironic to hear two brilliant women talking about the shortcomings of women's thinking. I think we lost that because of feminism. We used to know that most women weren't able to do it but some were, and we accepted it. Now, because we push women who are not able, we muddy the waters and people have a hard time discern those who are able, which is a shame.
Bingo, there are women who can really think, but just as men are more physical geared for faster and stronger acts, women are more geared for caring and organizing and comforting. Even these two overlooked so many obvious things in this video.
Men don’t pursue money in isolation, they do so often for the provision of their family so they are attuned to the needs of those they care for just in a different way
I have realized that egalitarianism and equity have a place within families and with children (to the degree Eg. that I don’t mind the struggling student getting a bit more attention than the gifted student) but these “feminine” approaches don’t scale well and don’t apply to adults at scale without being corrupted or at the very least ending up unmeritocratic and therefore harmful due to drops in performance (do you want your pilot, surgeon, engineer, etc being a diversity hire?). I heard it attributed to Ben Shapiro that he said he’s a communist at home (from each according to their ability, to each according to their need) but a staunch free market advocate in broader society.
You ought to pursue truth in science, irrespective of how it impacts people, short of causing actual - not perceived or projected - harm to them. Then, after the data has been collected and analysed, policies can be derived from the research, at which point we can all ‘worry’ about feelings. Edit: otherwise our findings are biased from the start, and not scientific to begin with. We end up with a botched academic field.
Women are the enforcers of morality. Today, the bad thing is the recognition of sex differences or anything racial, so they go from slut shaming to modern day witch hunts.
18:46 YES!! This happened to me too. I loved animals and thought they were better than people, in some ways. Now that I have two girls, I would football kick a dog across the room to protect either of them. I just don't feel the same about them.
Making everyone feel good is NOT humanly possible. That’s parents job to make their children feel good. It’s not women’s or men’s who are in power, to make certain people feel good about themselves. And to do that. , how do THEY decide who needs to be made to feel good and how?
Could b that it wasn't maternal instinct making you see animals as infantile, but maternal instinct overriding Ur will not to hurt animals and in much the same way as humans don't want to hurt eachother(wider cooperation), but given a shortage of resources(or the perception of), will separate into smaller groups to bang eachother over the head, eg: A tribe of hunters, apon spotting another tribe of hunters within the vicinity of a large herd of big game, are better off waving to the other tribe and coordinating the hunt, to be more successful(doubling the group size will triple it's effectiveness). But, if there was a shortage of large game, will become herders by defending the herd. One tribe will demonize the other for trying to pinch their food and the other will do the same= 'total' war; gloves off, as one tribe is likely to starve and theirs is their priority(just like ur kid is yours)
maybe with the alarming drop of University educated men presently, that proportion of men at the highest levels of intelligence will become more equally shared by men and women. If you simple suppress the number of men who will pursue higher education, I suppose that's one way to equalize those numbers.
34:04 The correct term is "Unit Cohesion". Or used to be back in the Stone Age". I have no idea what the new Woke Military term is. Concept is basically 100 guys, 1000, 100000 whatever all laser focused on one thing. The MISSION. The only way home is through. Absolutely ANYTHING, or ANYONE, that compromises that focus is a liability to the entire op. Why commanders lose sleep trying to eliminate absolutely every single one, known, unknown, anticipated or conceivable as much as humanly possible with what is at hand. Which in combat theater in some God Forsaken hell hole at the end of the Earth with a supply chain that runs across half the planet is NEVER ideal. THAT is where "Unit Cohesion" makes up the difference. And has throughout History. It is NOT something you experiment with. Certainly not under fire. NOTHING is "Theoretical" in combat. It is life or death. Yours or theirs. LITERALLY. MORE of theirs, as quick as possible, with as few of your guys in a Body Bag in an Aluminum flag drapes box on it's way to Arlington the better. It is a simple, brutal equation. Always will be. For lack of a nail, the shoe was lost. Lack of a shoe the horse was lost. Lack of a horse the battle lost. Lack of a nail the WAR was lost.
Oh dear. I was so encouraged by the name of this podcast as a direct acknowledgement to our European indigenous cultures that existed for way longer than has the abrahamic mind virus that invaded our beautiful homelands a short 1700 years ago and destroyed at worst and subverted/inverted at least our native spiritual ways of being. Of particular egregious concern is the rupture of the male/female dynamic when xianity removed the Divine Feminine from World (and with Catholicism conditionally re-inserted Her by elevating Mary). The Maiden, Mother, Matriarch motif is the cyclic feminine triad that exists in all ethnic cultures and it is so dis-spiriting to learn within 2 minutes of this video that the "coming to grips with xianity" is just a cover for evangelistic activity. The world is in this mess solely due to the abrahamic dogmas that were unleashed; first on the ancient Hebrews, then on the Gentiles to the West of Judea and lastly to the Gentiles to the East (and Africa) broadly speaking. In some parts of eastern Europe (and into the Rus) xianisation did not occur until the late 1300s (and only then under the duress of direct military coercion - aka WAR). I direct those interested with open minds to look further into the true nature of xianity starting with the below resources John Lamb Lash "Not in His Image" (JLL also found on RU-vid at Ginny Thwaite) Catherine Nixy "The Darkening Age" James Russell "The Germanisation of Early Medieval Christianity" Prof Paula Fredriksen has books and many presentations on YT. Her informal presentation titled The Gods run in the Blood is particularly telling for how native spirituality operates. Podcasts MythVision and Gnostic Informant present outstanding scholars and literature
Conciensiousness tested by OCEAN in dating sites show low C levels among women. Psychoanalytically superego is lower among women both tests concur in this finding.
32 minutes is enough. Women are less aggressive? Women are better negiotiators? What more non-falsifiable and most likely false assumptions are you going to torture your audience with in the last fourteen minutes? Women are better at maths? A year ago I had high respect for you, Louise.
Generally men and women have the same priorities, but we operate in different areas to meet an outcome. I think it’s kind of amazing that we’re so different. Women encourage other women. We tend to emulate and wanting to fit in. We see it with fashion trends, diet (veganism), exercise, education, and entertainment. I think men too, but they do it in other ways. I thought it was the case that men can have higher IQs on average, but also have the lowest of IQs on average. Right?
Only problem is that men in the IDF are still responsible for the overwhelming majority of combat duties. Make that equal, and conditions will improve further for all.
This is an absolute lie, there is widespread IDF sexual violence and widespread torture and sexual violence against Palestinian detainees. The Moslem Hamas has a much better record. Stop spreading utterly debunked Zionist racist propaganda.
Only 12 minutes in and I can tell this is going to be a great conversation. She found that in academia men challenge ideas and women recite them. I'm glad someone said it aloud.
Right. As someone who's terminally online and practically debates abortion as a hobby, women tend to be very poor debaters, and get emotional and offended by certain ideas instead of pushing back on them in an intelligent way.
@@sophiadaly4712 I didn't find Waldo but I found the Marxist guy! He has an holistic understanding so I guess my linear, logical thinking is utterly defeated. I accept it.
I worked for many years in a factory that was 100% male. Recently I've started attending university as a mature-age student. Let's just say it is one hell of a culture-shock.
I would love to know too. ^^^ My experience with construction is that there are clearly differences in these domains. At the same time, I've had really rich, deep and touching conversations with other construction workers who just want a fantastic relationship with their wives and would do almost anything to figure it out.
You need to use their standards against them. Demand equality for men e.g. do they have the same number of male students as female? Are there an equal number of programs for men as there are for women. Do they discriminate in favour of women?
She's very good but, when it comes to the codes of conduct, she must not see how easily they could be weaponized for the purposes of ideological enforcement. I had a very bright female professor who let the mask slip more than once in our philosophy seminar. She was actively spreading "whisper network" gossip. Title IX is frequently used to crush dissent and get rid of skeptics of the woke narrative.
What Is The "Woke" Narrative? I Ask, Because The Term "Woke" Was Highjacked From The "Urban Community" 7-8 Years Ago. It Isn't Uncommon To Have Our Colloquialism's Adopted By Others. I'm Simply Curious As To What The Term Has Become, Due To It Being Slung Around So Loosely All Of The Time 🤷🏿♂️.
You also see this in the workplace. I’m in a position where I look at data and tell teams what they should do strategically. Sometimes I’m having to tell a VSP (very senior person) that their fancy-ass campaign didn’t work and why, and what they should do. When the VSP is a man, it tends to land well, they work with me to fix it. They are pragmatic and neutral, and often loop me in on their next project from the start. When the VSP is a woman what do you think happens? They complain. They complain to my boss, they complain to my boss’s boss, they complain to the CEO, they get me taken off projects, they trash everything I do and make drama. I’m basically not loyal enough. I’ve had it suggested to me in the past that maybe sometimes I should ignore the data and be loyal to my fellow female colleagues. Ah lol. I’d laugh if it wasn’t a pattern I’ve seen in every place I’ve worked. Halp.
7:20 - 8:40: Wow, this is really fascinating - or more like scary, actually. A slightly less charitable way of saying it is that "women would rather have their personal erroneous beliefs verified than discover the truth". 'The marketplace of ideas' is essentially a male 'construct', or concept. It's only a few more steps to 'conclude' that women cannot be trusted to pursue truth. Although, my personal experience has been that women are about as willing to accept logical conclusions different from their pre-conceived notions as men. At least when removed from their 'close circles'.
@@Hammerhead137 That is why I inserted the caveat: when removed from their 'close circles' It is also a hysteria phenomenon - not so much related to the individual woman, but the group dynamic, amplified by SoMe. When people enter war/crisis mode, they shut down the willingness to entertain 'other truths'.
Yes, it's true. Every strength you think is important is something you're naturally good at. You didn't even have to work at it! You were gifted at being good everything important just because you were born male! True, the public, the experts, the world in general don't agree with how great you are. But that just proves how wrong the world is.
I completely agree about females being more inclined to empathy and caring because of our maternal instinct but once you have your own child your energy of that gets used up,and rightly so, on your child, that's why it exists. Actually what you start seeing is how your empathy for others can actually hinder the safety and flourishing of your own offspring and have to start prioritising them over anything. Motherhood is the single biggest shift in my social and politic views and I believe for the better!
Yet its fathers who teach empathy through discipline - the child is forced to look through someone elses eyes than just have your mother give in to all your demands as a kid, specially single mothers who would rathe placate cos its easier
@@spiff1 you obviously don't live in my house because this is not our dynamic. Loving your child does not mean being permissive, quite the opposite. There's a happy middle ground where most parents live.
That doesnt change anything I said ps your solipsism is showing luv, like many womb-men you dont understand generalisations or averages or patterns or trends@@Slade89
School used to be basic discipline for men then comes to education but when is change to cater woman everything is very fem centric feelings over facts
Er excuse me. I've been thinking this for years but have only been able to quietly discuss these thoughts under my breath to my closest friends, for fear of being denounced as a sexist pig. And here you go making a video with Cory launching straight into this subject with no apology!!! This is such a good podcast I'm a huge fan of you Louise and its fantastic to hear Corys views which of course are far more accurate and researched than my bigotted thoughts on the world....seriously though - could any man make this case publicly?
It isn't to do with balls, its about intuition vs knowledge. Cory has properly researched this area and can discuss what she found with evidence. You would be an idiot to mouth off about something you could not substantiate properly, on such a controversial subject.@@MrMark595
Most journalism is dead. TV is dead, entertainment in general is rubbish, academia is corrupted, Politics is corrupted. The people who say they want to improve things are destroying everything.
I think less men going to university is going to have all sorts of interesting impacts and consequences. As far as I can see intellectual culture is beginning to grow online a lot more, RU-vid for example is mostly a male thing. So as this probing intellectual culture moves away from the 3rd level sector it has become a lot more innovative, free and willing to take risks, away from the stultifying and (s)mothering atmosphere of universities where what they are talking about has become very prevalent. As a result universities will start to lose their status amongst many, not all of course, men. In fact this is already happening as many young men bail out. Teaching has lost status for these reasons. Expect RU-vid to be the place where we will find the next Mozart, Picasso or even Einstein! For every action there is another equal and opposite reaction.
Here's an idea; value the work of the homesteaders. Still no political/economic value pointed out ... And look at society! Another to all the smash the patriarchy people, sure but then what? Make a freakin plan and some actual practical solutions! Robespierre's runnin rampid with rabbies!
Children raised in single mother homes fair much worse than those raised in single father households. Is it then a surprise that our educational institutions perform so poorly and underserve our students? Academia is now fully controlled by women and the results speak for themselves.
women vote for more government, vote for charming/good-looking politicians, easier to manipulate through emotional language thereby securing the votes, and vote for policies that are only good for women, not society as a whole
@@spiff1100% agreed The irony is, this blatant feminization of society and demonization of masculinity will call forth a much more authoritarian masculine spirit Contrary to the original goal of the female force Ie, self fulfilling prophecy
@@spiff1 agreed Ironically this feminization will call forth a more authoritarian masculine spirit Which the combat of was the original goal Self fulfilling prophecy
I would love to see an interview with primatologist Sarah Blaffer Hrdy, author of Mother Nature and other books concerning evolutionary biology and women
The Police are a bit rough because they go up against men who are criminal types. For the sake of public safety it is unwise to look at lawbreakers as simply being misguided or misunderstood as women might view them. The job of the Police is to contain people who present a risk to the public. I think a police force designed by women might have a hope for the best attitude rather than one that is ready, willing and able to confront lawbreakers. Police get more training on dealing with people who are in a mental health crisis and situations like that today so that is good., but I don't think women understand how ruthless men operate the same way men do.
One interesting thing about the whole "high female share in academia/education and other such fields" development is, that is it also applies to Europe and Japan, but there wokeness in the 2010s+ sense is nearly nonexistent. Europe is pretty progressive about environmental things and historically (until the mid 2010s) was also very pro-immigrant/pro-multiculturalism, but there has been zero evolution towards adopting the classic current Anglo talking points. In fact, places like Sweden and France are actively resisting and rolling back gender ideology. Gender ideology has never even caught up in Japan and my own home country of Switzerland. Now the question is: why could that be? Allow me to offer this explanation: In the case of Switzerland, the reason is that our "social temperature" is infinitely lower than in the U.S. Now, what might that mean? Actually, I think the moniker I have given it already perfectly explains it. Whatever might arise as a social-relevant topic of discussion in the Anglosphere, is only discussed with 1/100th of the fervor in Switzerland. So even if women, also, dominate fields like education here, their typical feminine impulses can't really effect much, because they always first wander through a "chilling" filter of the social temperature being so low. The same of course is true for typically masculine impulses, but as this video correctly analyzes, masculine thought is not currently in the ascendance.
Sweden is not rolling back gender ideology. politicians are pushing wokeness and several bigger companies is infiltrated by DEI. I wonder how much these sex differences, womens empathy for vulnerable groups and the very much important 'equal representation' is amplified by the fact they are the vulnerable group, when they are overrepresented they tend to forget everything about 'equal representation'
I am convinced it is a combination of Chinese intelligence and the general failure of heterogenous societies. Give the high-immigration countries of Europe another ten to twenty years and let’s see if they discovered a better way. I sure hope that they do.
20:48 And DEFINITELY one of the main toolsof predatory Psychopaths. Sexual or otherwise. I mean c'mon the Criminal Profile of Predators using an injured animal in the back of the rusty van with the black spray painted windows is almost a cliche'. How many cheesy slasher films open with EXACTLY this scenario?
The difficulty with female empowerment is it undermines family which is the top potential for 80+% of women ... its both an elitist and victimhood ideology
Thanks for this conversation. Reflecting on who we are, where we are in times of great change is how we have survived as a species. The differences in masculine and feminine are of great value, like the poles of a battery. Each needs the other. With out the " other " there is no charge. Today there is alot of time spent critiquing each individually. Changing times does require movement to maintain balance. Recognizing and supporting our differences and values, including our strengths and weaknesses is why we still exist. I've appreciated conversations such as this as steps in the right direction. Theres far too much time spent on vilifying one, the other or both. Nialism isn't a great next step.
I think we're already seeing the pendulum swing back away from the female-centric leadership styles. Men are not participating, especially as it relates to western women, and it will be most amazing to see women respond in return. 👀
Only way to get women under control is war (or collapse), because its other men that facilitate females ruining everything, and women only act right when they need men directly ie hard times.. when they are spoilt they act worse for some bizarre reason.. the more power/wealth they have, the more unruly and destructive they become, its weird, you'd think they'd chill out a bit lol
☝️ Women SHOULD be allowed in the military BUT... -Women should be restricted from certain jobs (ex. infantry, field artillery, special operations forces). -Women should be restricted from whole branches (ex. Navy).
No, actually. Prisons are full of short guys. Big guys tend not to be as pressured to acts of reputation defense. It is usually more of a short guy issue. I read a paper about this. Short men are also more likely to become entrepreneurs.
@@sinesaii I do not dispute that there are short guys who are aggressive and violent. These are prepared, school of life training and learned the violent skills. In the animal kingdom small animals do not attack larger one especially if the same species. A non violent non athletic small man will not aggress an athletic agressive woman. As you know violence is multifactorial. I personally know of small men who have been physically abused by their spouses Unilaterally. Unfortunately in the media this has been portrayed as funny. From Laurel and Hardy’s movies up until today. Violent mothers stop being violent when their kids are teenagers. I know that from professional experience and no it is not because those teenagers were angels nor because those mothers mellowed down. In the agressive act there is usually a warning ( shouting) a natural way to protect the others from ‘extermination, then violence towards things and objects, not missing scanning the environment so the act is efficient, no harm to the aggressor and a room to escape. We were born like that, animals from cats to wild animals do that.not doing that ll occurs when judgment is impaired. A toddler hitting his parents, a demented person aggressing the staff, etc.. I mentioned a factor. Many cultural, psychological, temperamental, spiritual and physical factors interact. One thing for sure denying or excluding a factor is a nor science nor an open minded assessment but only political or with preconceived agenda.
In sociobiology, hierarchy is different among women. A female head nurse menstrual cycle modifies the menstrual cycles of female nurses. Female nurses ‘ menstruation is synchronized with the head nurse.
10:42 I recall I've heard the Aporians and Duttonians discuss this, can't remember exact percentage, also it's debated. However, it seems to be a much smaller percentage than you'd think. This is like the question of what percentage of society becomes Progressive before it tips and swings in that direction. I think I've heard, 20%. The reason it doesn't take that much for these things, is that what you're usually doing is influencing the K strategists, more environmentally sensitive ppl, who sense the changing trends and often adapt their behavior to some extent. When that starts happening, the culture changes. Thus a smallish vocal minority can have outsized impacts within an institution, or organizational system, or structured society at macro level, we have seen as much in recent years, fosho.
Great episode! After trying out to be a firefighter it became very apparent why women shouldn't be in certain fields on the front line. We have our strengths and shouldn't feel threatened when men shine in certain activities.
Shouldn't it be "Maiden, Mother, Crone?" Shadow connotations seem important to me...but less alliteration I suppose. Also, The White Witch is way cooler in the Magician's Nephew than in Lion,Witch, Wardrobe.
