The First Bulgarian Empire 

Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars from the fifth century BC, well before Bulgars (a Turkic tribe) or Slavs online.ucpress.edu/search-results?q=Bulgars%20a%20tribe&fl_SiteID=1&qb={%22q%22:%22Bulgars%20a%20tribe%22}&page=1 Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Around 4% of Bulgarian genes are derived outside of Europe and the Middle East or are of undetermined origin (by 858 CE), of which 2.3% are from Northeast Asia and correspond to Asian tribes such as Bulgars,[13] a consistent very low frequency for Eastern Europe as far as Uralic-speaking Hungarians. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_studies_on_Bulgarians Science, 14 February 2014, Vol. 343 no. 6172, p. 751, A Genetic Atlas of Human Admixture History, Garrett Hellenthal at al.: " CIs. for the admixture time(s) overlap but predate the Mongol empire, with estimates from 440 to 1080 CE (Fig.3.) In each population, one source group has at least some ancestry related to Northeast Asians, with ~2 to 4% of these groups total ancestry linking directly to East Asia. This signal might correspond to a small genetic legacy from invasions of peoples from the Asian steppes (e.g., the Huns, Magyars, and Bulgars) during the first millennium CE." www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4209567/figure/F3/ Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674 Utrigurs (Utighurs) Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918 Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev) By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397 Bulgars, Turkic, also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850 Kuvrat (Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529 Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’ www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true Originally Asiatic nomads who inhabited the shores of the Black Sea at the end of the 5th century ad but after ad 679 they crossed the Danube and founded a state in the old province of Moesia. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095534628 www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199534043.001.0001/acref-9780199534043-e-582 The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437 Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family. oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28 In the different classifications proposed so far, there is a wide consensus that the earliest split in the family was between the Bulgharic (also known as ‘Oghuric’) branch, which today only survives in Chuvash, and the Common Turkic branch, which is ancestral to all other contemporary Turkic languages. academic.oup.com/jole/article/5/1/39/5736268 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster tends to disappear projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible. academic.oup.com/jole/article-pdf/5/1/39/32972809/lzz010.pdf The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama. www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545 The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don. www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625 Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent. www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language

Sword of Justice check out this link here, it discusses this very subject. www.britannica.com/topic/Bulgar

As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars www.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgar encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-bulgarians xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. www.factmonster.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml

Sword of Justice your link takes me to a bunch of outdated works..... lol brittanica wins

No need to engage with this pan-turkic troll. He and several other are just going around to convince that all the world is turkic. Paid trolls, without reason and sence. About the vidio, good review. If I may few corrections. The title of first Bulgarian rules is not clear till this day. One is certain, though. It was not khan. And also nobody called Bulgarain state ''khaganat'' . otherwise good video, thanks.

Same story here. Glad I found this channel.

Bulgaria History is Epic my friend!

It is not so true! Alot of Russian influence about slavs here and turkich root!

@@kaloyancholakov3725 i got into it through roman history, really epic

Same here.

😢 هذا التاريخ يدول انا البربر او الامزيغ كما يوسمهوم اليوم اصلهوم من البغرلية ودخلو الى افريقية. هوما موجدين في العلم. ا

Same here

Thanks for saying bulgarian from macedonia

Props to you bro but careful saying it that way in front of Macedonians. It could get heated.

Thank you! He did such an excellent job and his knowledge is so wonderful and I really had a blast bringing it to life.

“Cyril the general retired into the city named Odyssus, and stayed there while Vitalian withdrew into the province of Bulgaria.” - (Chr., LXXXIX, 75) The province of Bulgaria, in the time of Vitalian, what does it mean? How long does it take to establish a name for a certain territory? Centuries. Today's books are a bunch of lies , written with a specific purpose.

Bulgaria was one of the three superpowers arround the early 800s to the late 900s a.d.,the other two were the frankish empire and the byzantenes,also bulgarians are famous for destroying the three language dogma wich say the gospel can be preached only in Hebrew,Latin and Greek,Bulgarian was the fourth recognised language,by the western and eastern churches ,...bulgarians had the privilege to listen to preaching in their native language,something that in the west happened 6 centuries later during the reformation,before that the west had only services in latin

Artur de Sousa Rocha you have quickly become one of my favorite people ;) seriously, thank you for your kind words of support. It means the world to us.

I second that statement!

Bulgaria has had a profound influence in the world. If it werent for bulgaria stopping the Arab invasion in 8th century europe would likely be speaking Arabic now. Secondly it created the 2nd most used alphabet in the world. And that was spread not by force like the Latin one but peacefully through monks and books. Note also if it werent for bulgarian john atanassoff's invention of the digital computer we would likely not be on RU-vid to begin with.

@@thatisme3thatisme38 spot on. Never mind the digital watch wich the guy that created it came from my village sorry to brag haha. He also created space food for nasa which imo is quite important to. And a Bulgarian born in Austria created the contraceptive pill

They broth the glagolic alphabet. The cirilic was invented in Bulgaria after they arrived and were given government offices by the king.

First, these two are never mentioned to be related, let alone brothers. Second, the alphabet that Cyril reformed and 'returned in trend' as I like to say exists at least from the 4th century.

Rayna Tumbeva dude Cyril and Methodius were literally brothers every Bulgarians knows that

Kliment was the major one

@@0ddpsychxo_327 Every Bulgarian knows it, yes. It's another question if it is true. And we have no historical proof of it being true. There was a preacher Methodius who used some strange letters and there's Cyril who according to the story that is still taught in Solun restored the lost Illirian letters. Nobody at the mentions them as brothers. Besides the biographies that don't even match each other and are most probably fake. Just like nobody mentions slavs or actually anything that would match their migration. Nor do we have proof of the so-called southern, eastern and western slavs being related. In general anything that would even sparkle suspicion of the existence of such people. Our history is full of lies.

The truth about Turks, Avars Turks, Volga Turks also called Volga Bulgars coming from same ancestors. I am sure it's not tough in education department of Bulgaria. Hard to swallow the reality but good to know it.

NONSENSE Do you have PRIMARY SOURCES to prove a Turkic origin for Bulgarians?

Thanks to the creators of this so aducative video❤

You are wrong...

You are really wrong... It's all excuses like the always - bulgarian way...

Amen

Totally agree that Bulgarian is a title. A very prestige title. But like every title it comes with its weight and our is to serve God. Most Dedicated nation in service…..

Yes, and Simeon II was the first Tsar _prime minister🤣🤣🤣🤣

Tracians ? /Траки/

@@Stefan_trekkie Yes, mostly. What you call thracians is another big question on itself. If we read the contemporary sources the Goths for example would be classified as thracians.

@Jotaro97 Jordanes himself, who else.

@Jotaro97 the gothic bible was created in what is now bulgaria. There is also some question of whether the Gettae and the Goths were not one and the same. The gettae being the thracian tribe.

Makes literally no sense thracians were native to that region and other groups

Of Cuman origin

@@pompacitokmakci Sure i dont have problem with that.

@@user-oq4sq8ig1k 👍

@@pompacitokmakci Bulgarian *

@@DimitarFCBM Bulgarian empire of Cuman origin

Rumen Doychev The Bulgars (also Bolgars, Bulghars, Proto-Bulgarians,[1] Huno-Bulgars[2]) were a semi-nomadic Turkic people who flourished in the Pontic Steppe and the Volga basin in the 7th century AD.[3][4] The Bulgars (also Bulghars, Bulgari, Bolgars, Bolghars, Bolgari,[1] Proto-Bulgarians[2]) were Turkic semi-nomadic warrior tribes that flourished in the Pontic-Caspian steppe and the Volga region during the 7th century. They became known as nomadic equestrians in the Volga-Ural region, but some researchers say that their ehtnic roots can be traced to Central Asia.[3] During their westward migration across the Eurasian steppe, the Bulgar tribes absorbed other ethnic groups and cultural influences in a process of ethnogenesis , including Hunnic and Indo-European peoples.[4][5][6][7][8][9] Modern genetic research on Central Asian Turkic people and ethnic groups related to the Bulgars points to an affiliation with Western Eurasian populations.[9][10][11] The Bulgars spoke a Turkic language, i.e. Bulgar language of Oghuric branch.[12] They preserved the military titles, organization and customs of Eurasian steppes,[13] as well as pagan shamanism and belief in the sky deity Tangra.[14]

@@papazataklaattiranimam are u turk.

@@papazataklaattiranimam Roach

That's right Brother turks are the biggest history thieves of all They think anyone who rode a horse in the steppes ws a turk Read Dr. Zhivko Voynikov "Who are the Ancient Bulgarians or ProtoBulgarians " online He is the greatest authority on Bulgarian origin

Българите не са тюрки а иранци

Българите са трако-скити, а иранка е баба ти :)

Their ruler elites are Turkic.

Turkic speakers, worship to Tengri, have Turkic names, their brothers in Russia still speak Turkic languages but separated tribe! Well. Reallly intresting.

Coward Why did you abandon the Turkic Uighurs? ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-e6bPGl10Cts.html&ab_channel=BBCNews

The theory of the turkic origin of the bulgars is mostly discredited in Bulgaria.

​@@user-zr9ui7ot9tturk_ Slav sentezi

Boris Kgan betrayed Turkishness, his ancestors opposed Christianity for years to protect themselves, Boris and Bulgarians became Christians and forgot Turkish customs and traditions.

NONSENSE 1. Give PRIMARY SOURCES that show the name Bulgarian comes from bulgamak? 2.Give PRIMARY SOURCES for Tengrinism in Bulgaria?

​yes he came in Roman Macedoniae Province as a Tengrist for grabbing territory in the time of ramparting of Roman Empire ! Baptised and took name Mihail in 864 AD in Rome . In 868 Cirilo and Methidius went to Rome too , to take approval for scriptures to be translated on Old Slavic Language , to be used in liturgies . How he managed to be so famous in two years of his Slav speaking and Christianity is miracle !

I think you just haven’t looked enough. There is much more conversation about Bulgaria nowadays. Nevertheless, I love your country and I’ve been to both parts of the island. Dublin is one of my all time favourite cities. I think we have much in common. Best regards!

Thank you for taking interest in Bulgaria... Ireland is a very beautiful country and the only nation in western world that respects us along side Scotland but that’s cause mainly we have the same national instrument so it makes sense for them to like us.. god bless Ireland very heart warming people

Common, from antiquity until today there always had been connections between lands of Celts and what is Bulgaria today. Few cities including the capital were founded by Celtic tribe Serdi, Sophia started as Serdika en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serdi .There was Celtic invasion in Balkans. James David Bourchier is an Irish journalist a friend to Bulgaria buried in Rila Monastiry Bulgaria (a honour given to those who contributed with their life for Bulgarians,the only foreigner who received this honour) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_David_Bourchier . Read what he wrote, in most difficult moments for Bulgarians he stood up . Irish and Bulgarians have a lot in common especially long centuries under foreign suppression , struggles and sacrifices.

Hello,from Plovdiv,Bulgaria.We have stunning nature , just like you,but different.If someone tells me:the thracians were south branch of the celts",I will agreed.I've seen some small "Stonehange" in Southeast part of the country,in diameter 12 meters,although in not good shape.

@@simeongeorgiev852 if I win big in the Euro millions. I would take in your country on my way around the world, might even have a few pints of Bulgarian Guinness in your local with you. Best regards stay safe. ✊☘️

Yordan Lazarov As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. The Columbia Electronic Encyclopedia, 6th ed. Copyright © 2012, Columbia University Press. Cambridge University Press books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false

As the number of evidence of linguistic, ethnographic and socio-political nature show that Bulgars belonged to the group of Turkic peoples.[36][24][26][30] The Bulgars (also Bolgars or proto-Bulgarians[40]) were a semi-nomadic people of Turkic descent, originally from Central Asia, who from the 2nd century onwards dwelled in the steppes north of the Caucasus and around the banks of river Volga (then Itil). en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Bulgaria Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) The Volga Bulgars, a Turkish tribe then living on the east bank of the Volga River, ... the laws of Islam to the Bulgars, who had recently converted to the religion. www.bookrags.com/research/ahmad-ibn-fadlan-ued/#gsc.tab=0 Eastern Bulgars , Bulgars Ancient Turkic people originating in the region n and e of the Black Sea. www.encyclopedia.com/environment/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/balkan-states Volga Bulgaria was a northeastern European Turkic state that formed during the 9th century and continued into the first four decades of the 13th century. www.readcube.com/articles/10.1002/9781118455074.wbeoe009 www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopedia-of-slavic-languages-and-linguistics-online/*-COM_031941 referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/encyclopaedia-of-islam-3/bulghars-COM_23726 www.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-Bulgar+languages encyclopedia.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars www.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgar encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bolgars encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Bulgars encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Proto-bulgarians xn--80ad7bbk5c.xn--p1ai/en/content/brief-history-suvar-bulgars bulgarizdat.ru/index.php/book1/article1-1 Bulgars, Eastern bŭl´gärz, -gərz [key], Turkic-speaking people, who possessed a powerful state (10th-14th cent.) at the confluence of the Volga and the Kama, E European Russia. www.factmonster.com/encyclopedia/social-science/cultures/other/bulgars-eastern (Cambridge University Press) books.google.com.tr/books?id=Ylz4fe7757cC&pg=PA8&lpg=PA8&dq=proto+bulgars&source=bl&ots=vvGsuu2J3g&sig=ACfU3U2YuPKKdgVQKhoUi2fyDiC99n4N_Q&hl=tr&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiRqIaDlNvmAhWM-yoKHW38DDI4FBDoATAAegQIBRAB#v=onepage&q=proto%20bulgars&f=false Population genetic analysis indicated that Conquerors had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-53105-5 hizliresim.com/stAHqu (Bulgar genetic proximity) Thus supporting the view that Tatars may be descendents of ancient Bulgars. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22520580/ Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/250688v1.full However, given the common Turkic genetic background of the Bulgars and Khazars, these ethnicities may be difficult to tell apart either archaeologically or genetically. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2019.12.15.876912v1.full.pdf Most Tatars trace their descent to Volga Bulgars, a medieval Turkic people who have inhabited the Middle Volga and lower Kama region. online.ucpress.edu/search-results?page=1&q=Bulgars Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Population genetic results indicate that they had closest connection to the Onogur-Bulgar ancestors of Volga Tatars. journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0205920&type=printable Onogur-Bulgars had been part of the Hunnic people, and after the death of Attila’s son Irnik, European Hun remains fused with the Onogurs. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6193700/ Caucasus as the first Turkic peoples (Avars, Bulgars, Huns, Khazars, Pechenegs) arrived. www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Exile www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2849381?journalCode=spc www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.2307/2853091?journalCode=spc brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789047423560/Bej.9789004163898.i-492_006.xml

@@papazataklaattiranimam your mom gay

@@papazataklaattiranimam They are not! We are the original indigenous people to this land

@@Smail345 he is "macedonian" pretending to be Muslim and get us angry ,don`t feed the troll, plastic as the Ohrid lake ...

fakedonian Whatever you say about Bulgarians , you say about yourselves Because you are Bulgarians Brainwashed by Serbian Fascists to hate your own people

Bulgar🇹🇷 is Turkish language

@@pompacitokmakci Hanim, Bulgarian is a Slavic language

@@pompacitokmakci proof?

@@DimitarFCBM Classified by phonetic criteria, Turkic languages are subdivided into a small r-language division, and a large z-division. The latter can again be subdivided into Yakut, the d-section, and y-languages. The r-group is The Ancient Northwestern Division: (I) Volga Bolghar (Volga- Bulgarian or Hunno-Bulgarian). Modem: (2) Chuvash. www.utpjournals.press/doi/pdf/10.3138/uram.7.1.34 The origin of the Tatars is subject to debate: are Kazan Tatars descendants of the pre-Mongol Turkic Bulgar people or descendants of the Tatars of the Mongol Golden Horde? www.international.ucla.edu/cnes/article/123623 More than a millenium of contact between Finno-Ugric (Mordvin, Mari and Permic) and Turkic languages (Bulgar-Chuvash and Volga Kipchak) in the Volga-Kama area have produced conditions of multilingualism and mutual linguistic influence. benjamins.com/catalog/tsl.108.23man The endangered Chuvash language is the only living representative of the Bulgar branch, the earliest offshoot of Proto-Turkic (PT), which is in many respects opposed to the Common Turkic (CT) languages. Evidence from Chuvash is of vital importance in reconstructing Proto-Turkic, particularly its phonology. Chuvash represents characteristic features of the Bulgar branch, such as two types of rhotacism (PT *ŕ > CT /z/, Bulg. /r/; PT *δ > Bulg. /r/ with /j/, /d/, /t/ and /z/ in different subgroups of CT), lambdacism (PT *λ > CT /š/, Bulg. /l/), the “Bulgar palatalization” (PT *s- > Bulg. /š-/ and PT *t- > Bulg. /č-/ in certain contexts) etc. (Dybo 2010; Róna-Tas & Berta 2011). These correspondences provide a more complete reconstruction of the Proto-Turkic phonological system. liberalarts.utexas.edu/lrc/extras/ichl/savelyev-crucial-role-of-chuvash-dialects.php The author has shortly surveyed the history of the widening of the term "Bulgar-Turkic phonological criteria". The last summary of the results of research on the Bulgar-Turkic criteria and their chronological validity was made by Lajos Ligeti in his monograph on Turkic-Hungarian linguistic interrelations (1986). In the paper the author has presented several recent Middle Bulgar-Turkic loans of the Volga Kipchak dialects, following Ligeti's criteria: (1) the prothetic y-; (2) the initial š < si/sï; (3) Ancient Turkic -n ∼ Chuvash -m. www.jstor.org/stable/23658336?seq=1 As mentioned above, we find that Chuvash and Volga Bulgar have r and I in positions where the other Turkic languages have z ands respectively: (I) Turkic z = Chuvash r: a) Tk. boz= Chu. pir 'cloth, linen' b) Tk. yiiz= Chu. ier '100' c) Tk. qaz- =Chu. xlr- 'dig' (2) Turkics = Chuvash /: a) Tk. ta'S =Chu. eu/ 'stone' b) Tk. -miS, -mlt (as in altm1s '60'. yetmis '70') =Chu. -ma/, -me/ '10' (asinutmBI'60',iitme/'70') This same rand I in Chuvash and Volga Bulgar, in some other instances also correspond to a Turkic r and /: (3) Turkicr=Chuvashr: a) Tk. kara =Chu. xura 'black' b) Tk. urt = Chu. piirt 'hut, tent' c) Tk. gor- =Chu. kur- 'see' (4) Turkic I = Chuvash /: a) Tk. ba/Jk =Chu. pula 'fish' b) Tk. e/ma = Chu. ulma 'apple' c) Tk. ogul= Chu. Iva/ 'son' prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/51428/021_Winter_99_Therien.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y The Turkic languages are further divided, whether one believes in Altaic unity or not, according to various characteristics, such as geography, or as follows, phonology. The first language to diverge from the rest of the Turkic languages is Chuvash (and Volga-Bulgar, which is either Old-Chuvash, or at some point merged with it), based on it exhibiting r and l where the others have z and s, respectively. For instance, the Bulgar word for 'nine' is taxar, while its cognate in Oguz is toquz. For the purposes of this paper, the r/l - z/S division is the most important, so that with the exception of Chuvash and Volga Bulgar, the Turkic languages will be treated as a whole unit. prism.ucalgary.ca/bitstream/handle/1880/51428/021_Winter_99_Therien.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y The Proto-Bulgarian language, whose Turkic character is fully proved, was the first Turkic language that came in contact with the language of the Slavs who lived on the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 5th century until the second half of the 7th century, when the peninsula was populated by Proto-Bulgarians. apcz.umk.pl/czasopisma/index.php/LC/article/download/LC.2020.015/25589 In this paper, the Bulgar-Turkic (Late Old Bulgarian = LOB) loanwords of the Proto-Perm ian period of the Perm ian languages are discussed. Contrary to W ichmann (Tschuw. Lehnw.) and others (e.g. Pedotov, 1st. svjazi I -II) only those loans are regarded to be from the Proto-Perm ian period which occur, besides Votyak, not only in the P (= Permyak) dialect of the Zyryan language, b u t also in its northern dialects (Lu., Le., S, Y, Pech., I, Vm., Ud., etc.). real-j.mtak.hu/3483/1/ActaOrientalia_37.pdf The Bulgar-Turkic, or Chuvash loans in the Permian languages fall into three groups: a/ loan-words taken from Middle Bulgarian (= MB) in the Proto-Permian period (20-22 words); b/ MB loan-words in the Permyak (= P) dialect of Syryan borrowed through Votyak mediation (9 words); c/ Chuvash loan-words in Votyak. These words, according to Wicbmann (1903) amount to about 130, but the actual number of the Chuvash elements in Votyak is considerably larger. On the first two groups of loan- *-words see Redei--Rona-Tas (1972, 1975). An up-to-date study of the Chuvash elements in Votyak is still to be done. core.ac.uk/download/pdf/229451472.pdf horse’;Turkic ← Mongolicboro‘grey’:cf.MiddleMongol:Precl.Mo;SH;HYboro;Muq.bora;LMboro~bora;ModernMon-gol: Buryatboro; Khalkhabor; Kalmuckboro; Dagurbor(E); Khamniganboro;Mongolic ← BulgharTurkic *borŏ < bōz‘grey’: brill.com/view/book/9789004390768/BP000002.xml The old Bulgar language has otherwise left only slight traces in Modern Bulgarian. Apart from a small corpus of proper names (for example, Борис “Boris”; Крум “Krum”) and military and administrative titles from the time of the First Bulgarian Empire, only a handful of Bulgar words has survived in Modern Bulgarian. Words which are considered to be almost certainly of Bulgar origin are, for example: бъбрек “kidney”, бисер “pearl”, кумир “idol”, чертог “castle”. Some of these words even spread to other Slavic languages through Old Church Slavonic. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bulgarian_vocabulary However, while in these examples the source dialect of Old Turkic can be identified with reasonable certainty only as Bulgar Turkic real.mtak.hu/107544/1/062.2016.69.4.3 The Turkic family is fundamentally divided into two distinct branches, known as Bulgar Turkic and Common Turkic, although this division is often not highlighted in the literature, presumably because the Bulgar Turkic branch, although it represents the first historically attested Turkic expansion from Asia to Europe, is survived by a single modern language, Chuvash. www.routledgehandbooks.com/doi/10.4324/9780203645659.ch3 The etymology of three Mari words (činče ’perl’, šaman < šam-an ’tasty’ and šüγar ’grave’) are reconsidered by the author. She argues for the Volga ¬Bulgarian origin of all of them in the light of the new results of research on affricates in West Old Turkic varieties of the Oguric type (named formerly as Bulgar Turkic). In the case of činče ’pearl’ the donor Volga Bulgarian dialectal forms of non-Chuvash type can be reconstructed as *činčü ~ *čünčü ~ *činči and the ¬borrowing can be interpreted as a direct one. In the other two words the Volga Bulgarian donor forms had an initial *ś (Volga Bulgarian *śam, *śükär) but its Mari equivalents with š refer to Kazan Tatar (in the Middle Kipchak period) as the intermediary language. www.researchgate.net/publication/321424110_K_voprosu_ob_otrazhenii_tjurkskich_anlautnych_affrikat_v_volzhsko-bulgarskich_zaimstvovanijach_marijskogo_jazyka_On_the_Reflection_of_Anlaut_Affricates_in_Volga-Bulgarian_Loanwords_of_Mari

@@DimitarFCBM The earliest divergence of the Proto-Turkic language unity is the divi- sion into the ‘Bulgar’ and ‘Common Turkic’, or ‘Standard Turkic’ groups. A number of arguments (the dating of the Old Chinese loans into Proto- Turkic; different glottochronological calculations) force us to place this division into the time space on the boundary of the Christian Age, no later than the 3 rd century 󰁡.󰁤. The only offspring of the Bulgar branch still alive is Modern Chuvash, but the earlier stages of the proper Bulgar phonetic history are still reconstructable on the basis of the data of the early loans from the languages of the Bulgar group into other languages. The Bulgar loans into Hungarian, numbering about 400 words, are the most informative material for this topic. Below are the phonetic features of the Bulgar group compared to the Standard Turkic ones. 1 1) The development of the Proto-Turkic * λ, * lč, * ř into the Proto-Bulgar * l, * lč, * r , (Danube and Volga Bulgar l, lč > č , r ) but into Standard Turkic * š, * š, * z ;2) The change * s > š in the Proto-Bulgar before the Proto-Turkic * i, * i, * ia ; 3) The lack of the voicing of the PT * t- > ST * d- before voiced obstruents, * λ, * r and * ř ;4) The Bulgar development * -δ- > j in stems containing r, and * -δ- > -r- in other contexts (chronologically, this process will be placed after the 1 The last version of the PT reconstruction we are proceeding from appeared in Дыбо 2007, 5-64. 22 Anna Dybo coincidence of * r and * ř in Bulgar, cf. Chuv. xujъr ‘bark’ < PT * Kaδ Æ ř , ST kad Æ z ); 5) The preservation of the glide initials of the falling diphthongs in Bulgar and their disappearance in ST. The Bulgar loanwords in Hungarian can be divided into two groups. In the first group the assumed appearance of the Turkic prototypes is very close to the Proto-Turkic stage (excluding the ‘Bulgar palatalization’: the change * s- > š- before * i, * ï ). In the second group the prototypes appear to be extremely similar to the prototypes of Danube Bulgar loanwords in the South Slavic languages. So, the first group should be considered among ‘the Pre-Conquest Layer’ (Róna-Tas 1988, 752)-these were the loans oc- curring in the territory of Volga-Kama (or, as A. Róna-Tas now prefers to believe (Róna-Tas 2005, 436-438), Don-Kuban) area (5-7 th centuries 󰁡.󰁤.). The other group of the Bulgar loans in Hungarian are, apparently, the loans from the Danube Bulgar, which were acquired in the territory near present-day Hungary; the adaptation rules for their phonetics in Hun- garian are almost identical to the adaptation rules of early Slavic loans, which appeared in Hungarian in the time period ‘chronologically near to the Hungarian conquest of the Lower Danube region (895-900 󰁡.󰁤.)’- see Хелимский 2000, 422. www.academia.edu/5055305/Anna_Dybo_Moskva_Bulgars_and_Slavs_Phonetic_Features_in_Early_Loanwords

The Cirilic alfabet is created 30 years after Kiril dead, from his student. Tsar Boris build a school and sponsored them to create a new alfabet.

The disciples were bulgarian actually.

@@georgiivanov1568 yes, the bulgarian alphabet, witch now everyone calls cyrilic...

@@naidenromanov3050 That is one of the biggest lies about our history cyrillic is bulgarian!

Also Kiril and metodii - their father , Lav (Leo) was a relative to boyars family escaped from Bulgaria to Romaya during the time of Malamir or before@@thatisme3thatisme38

Bulgarian,not bulgar.The name Asparuch is a local Thracian name. Similar names described by Roman chroniclers are, Asparis, Asparul, Aspar, Asparina, Isperich..... Are they popular in Asia? I don't think so. The modern continuations of the name Asparuch are Caspar, Gasper .Are they popular in Turkey?

he is a postdoc specialized in bulgarian history....

​@mamaprudnavchaq 2 it's unclear how much Kliment's contribution is. It is very likely the others had as significant a contribution - i.e. Naum, Gorazhd, Angelarius etc. But it was made in Preslav that is for sure.

Glagolitic was used for centuries in Bosnia and Croatia well into the 16th century.

@@ssir5927 yes I did not say it was not. But it's not the bulgatian alphabet... But it fell into disuse for most of slavdom in 50 years after it was developed. Looks great but totally impractical alphabet

They used both Khanasubigi and Khan both are Turkic titles

@@papazataklaattiranimam not really considering we arent turkic or slavic

@@haunebu421 Bulgarians are Slavic peoples but Bulgars are Turkic peoples

@@papazataklaattiranimam this is not true at all it has been disproven and what was proven many times over is that Bulgars and Bulgarians is synonymous we are completely the same the only difference is that modern day Bulgarians also have a significant but not too much genetic descendance from thracians Bulgars were a unique indo European people who impacted the history of Euroasia in a unique way we are ancient and thats a fact you can never lie to fulfill your own agenda truth always wins

@@haunebu421 Bulgurian fantasy world 🤣🤣🤣

Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

@@petertodorov9540 why are you mad?

Difference between north Danube tracko-getaes and south Danube tracko-getaes consists the first still speak their ancestors romanic language, while south Danube trscko-..were slavised or turkished. In antiquity people from Volga till Crete spoke a romanic language, while today the some people from south Danube, except illiriens, some macedonians, few serbien, few bulgariend, don't speak the language of ancestors. Their DNA is from Mongolia or Volga, (volgari). Their ancestors from south or north Danube were the East Roman Empire once, today greeks, slaves, turks superposed under that huge romanic originary population, daco-tracko-getae, slavised in Ukraine too, in Serbia, which turks denominate Rumeli till 1878.

@@anutanastase5687 By the end of the 18th century, the inhabitants of Wallachia and Moldova, who were part of Bulgaria until the end of the 14th century, when Bulgaria was conquered by the Ottomans, spoke Bulgarian and wrote on the Bulgarian writing system Cyrillic until the mid-19th century. The place names and the names of some cities in Wallachia and Moldova are still Bulgarian today. A country called Romania - the name of the Roman Empire first appeared on the map of the world in 1859, but was internationally recognized in 1877 or 143 years ago.

@@stars5206 Propaganda Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820

@@anutanastase5687 Romanian was romanised after WW1. Before that, they spoke Bulgarian.

@@hannibalbarca2928 what proofs do you have that we were Turks? There's no proof of other religion than Christianity at the time, we were building with huge stones which excludes the possibility of borrowing architects, all descriptions contradict those of Turks...

Orphydian▪History no less related than a typical documentary.

Bulgarian Imperial Mapping It Founded by Cumans

@Jotaro97 Propaganda Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820

Jotaro97 Bulgars were genetically Turkic not Slavo-Thracian. They have nothing to do with Bulgarians Distance to: Bulgar 0.11311023 Bashkir 0.11527744 Tatar_Siberian 0.12075092 Uzbek 0.12710239 Turkmen_Uzbekistan 0.12989701 Hazara_Afghanistan 0.13009948 Nogai 0.13324712 Turkmen 0.13469246 Uygur 0.13800402 Hazara 0.14270297 Tatar_Siberian_Zabolotniye 0.14308569 Karakalpak 0.14883822 Yukagir_Forest 0.15485993 Udmurt 0.15744596 Tatar_Lipka 0.15875851 Tubalar 0.16120746 Besermyan 0.16843667 Kazakh 0.17111833 Tajik 0.17150055 Shor_Mountain 0.17202217 Mansi 0.17282107 Shor_Khakassia 0.17287921 Tatar_Kazan 0.17355490 Tlingit 0.17609774 Shor 0.17695017 Chuvash

Nomadic troll Brother some kids said that Oghurs are not Turks😂😂😂🤣🤣 So para mongols are not mongols according to this logic😂😂

Nomadic troll Look at those kids 😂😂

Kids like you yes 😂

Turks and "macedonians" pretending to be turks :)

I noticed a few inaccuracies. The church in the east and the west was both Catholic and Orthodox at the time. These words were a description of the one church. Also, Simeon was defeated by Tomislav on the border of Croatia, the river Drina.

Volga Turks called Volga Bulgars are the same clan. Hard to swallow it but it is the ultimate truth.

@@birsenganesh2468 Genetic research done 2 years ago by Bulgarians and Italian specialists in the field shows otherwise. It shows that Bulgarians are West EuroAsians which have e unique genetic map which completely excludes the turkic origin theory. Also u can check out Khan Krum the Terrible's painting in the Vatican which dates back to the 9th century. Krum was ethnically ProtoBulgarian from the Vokil dynasty. The painting clearly shows that no mongolic/turkic traits appear on him or the people he's feasting with. U can easily Google it. Please do your research before writing comments. And use facts when making arguments.

@Plamen Stoev С арабите сключват примирие, до колкото си спомням, за да могат да се фокусират върху нас. Армията им не се знае колко е била, като модерните историци правят изчисления на базата на извори, данни за това колко войски може да дадат темите, столичната тагма и т.н .

@Plamen Stoev Виж, има много неясноти и не трябва да се залита в крайности. До колкото си спомням, единствените писмени източници, които имаме за нашите деди, при идването им, ги определят в такива малки бройки, а други пък като "многобройни, като песъчинките по бреговете" или нещо подобно. От друга страна, начина по който са се изхранвали, също не предопределя за твърде много, но не и твърде малко, по брой население. Археологията показва че има доста населени места от техен тип. Фактът че ние носим името българи, а не плеадата от другите имена, също е показателен. Така че, макар и да не трябва да се залита в крайности, според мен една стабилна група от 60 000+, не е толкова далеч от реалността. А докато не излязат още нови факти, които или подкрепят или оборват двете крайности, е по добре да сме премерени в нашите мнения.

He Was a Khan he had like 50 sons if Putin can have 8 then Kubrat had 50

There’s only one Macedonia the Greek one The others are Slavs from 200 years ago

@@tatarkhan33 he was not a khan, this title was not used by Bulgarian rulers. Though this is just a detail, what I wanted to say is that legitimacy is an unknown factor in this case. It doesn't matter how many sons there were, it matters how many were declared as rule-inheriters.

Bulgars were tribal group of Turkic origin not different ethnics Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674 Utrigurs (Utighurs) Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918 Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev) By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397 Bulgars, Turkic, also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850 Kuvrat (Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529 Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’ www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true Originally Asiatic nomads who inhabited the shores of the Black Sea at the end of the 5th century ad but after ad 679 they crossed the Danube and founded a state in the old province of Moesia. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095534628 www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199534043.001.0001/acref-9780199534043-e-582 The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437 Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family. oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster tends to disappear projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible. academic.oup.com/jole/article-pdf/5/1/39/32972809/lzz010.pdf

@@papazataklaattiranimam Why do you block me fearless descendant of Turkish warriors ? Are you afraid of the truth?

@@papazataklaattiranimam jeez you never stop spamming do you. Relax already. Nobody cares what you write here

@@thatisme3thatisme38 do you mean nobody takes bulgarians serious in the world :D

@@papazataklaattiranimam no read it again if you didnt get it first time....

Sword of Erdogan We Turks will take back Bulgaria , Greece , Serbia Syria because we have ERDOGAN=ATATURK ERDOGAN=GLORY OF THE TURKS ERDOGAN=SOUL OF THE TURKS

🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐸🐦😅😅😅😅😅

had the same issue thought it was my bluetooth but i think its copyright so youtube usually mutes it or something

Aleksandar Kan Byzantine empire was a shadow of its former self by the time the Bulgars showed up. Hundreds of years of pointless wars with Sassanid Persia and several demographically devastating plagues had left the empire very weakened, so by around 700AD the Arabs were able to sweep in and not only conquer Persia, but basically all of the empire’s Oriental territories. The empire was ripe for the plucking really

@@Patrick3183 that is true in big parts but do keep in mind that the roman's war tactics and later on improvement to judicial, military and administrative departments were nothing to sneeze at. Although not as strong as during the Roman empire time or early Eastern Roman Empire, the Byzantine empire as also known was one of the strongest empires not only in Europe but also the world at that time. When you take into consideration that they managed to hold off and regain at some points territory from arabs and Sassanid empire it shows they were still a military might to be reckoned with. In addition Constantinopol was the biggest trade city in the world for a long time and brought in an enormous wealth that could fund mercenaries and be used in diplomacy (something they did so often throughout their last millennia).

Bulgarians are Thracians wrote Roman historians and plenty of historical sources and Bulgarian folklore and traditions prove that. Slavs do not exist in any historical source and were invented in the 18th century by Russian Empress Catherine the Great for geopolitical reasons. Proto-Bulgarians do not exist in any historical source and were invented in the 20th century. If you show me one source in which is wrote about Slavs before 18th century and that Bulgarians were Turkic and used title Khan before 20th century, I will give you 1000 dollars.

@@stars5206 Thracian tribes occupied these lands long before the Bulgars arrived (most of the tribes were completely absorbed by the time the Roman empire lost these territories) and yes , there might be some Thracian genes mixed up with slavic and early bulgarians which actually formed the nation in its majority.

@Mag last 100 years Bulgaria won the 1878 war from Ottomans Bulgaria won the 1886 war from Serbia Bulgaria won the First balkan war from Ottomans Bulgaria won Romanian front WW1 and partial victory on Macedonian front. also Battles of Doiran 1916,1917, 1918. Bulgaria won the Greek-Bulgarian conflict 1925 Bulgaria doesn't lose WW2, it gained land. Bulgaria won the Czechoslovak war

YES WE TURKS LOVE ERDOGAN ERDOGAN=ATATURK ERDOGAN=WISDOM OF THE TURKS WITH ERDOGAN WE CAN MAKE BULGARIA TURKISH AGAIN

@Jhon Smith Brother ,he is the one you worships Erdogan and wants to invade Bulgaria for Erdogan

We love you! Stay well!

North macedonians give dislike

@@nenogenov3826 chisti bulgari sa bate nqma kvo da dislaikvat

@@papazataklaattiranimam A lot of links a lot of stuff. How can your links explain why these Mongolian/turkic Bulgars lost not just their maternal but their paternal heritage as well? A comparison according to the genetic makeup across all of Europe between Bulgaria and an actual turkic country such as Turkey shows the Asiatic influence in Turkey varies from about 10 to 30 percent while in Bulgaria varies from 1 to less than 2 percent and from 2 to about 2.5 in muslimized Bulgarians such as the Pomaks. These numbers are lower than most of the other Balkan countries. Not that it actually maters as our statistics are relitavly close. Numbers as low as these have no effect on our bodies and are part of what science calls junk dna. The actual reasons why we are called Mongolians or Turkic or Tatars are coming from political or geopolitical reasons. Our ancestors have been here long before the said year of 681or any other linguistic group from the Slavic branch. All the name calling lies will not change the facts. N. Macedonia has been Bulgarian throughout most of our history here and we share a genetic resemblance like no other on the continent. Followed closely by Moldavia and especially by Wallachia. The Cyrillic alphabet or the Bulgarian alphabet was created by our own for our own personal use. The Bulgarian calendar is older than the Chinese and is acknowledged as the most accurate yet. Even if it was for a short while from Poland to the Rus everyone spoke and wrote in Bulgarian and no one has the power to take away or erase our contribution to society.

@@jimmypage2499 I didn’t even say Bulgarians are Turkic lmao they are Slavic-Balkanic peoples and wtf is mongolian bulgars hahaha

@@papazataklaattiranimam Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?

It is possible because his mother was Slavic

@@papazataklaattiranimam jeez u again ....

Let’s make it $2000. I will give also $1000.

Bulgars (< Turkic bulgha- ‘to mix, stir up, disturb’, i.e. ‘rebels’) A Turkic tribal union of the Pontic steppes that gave rise to two important states: Danubian-Balkan Bulgaria (First Bulgarian Empire, 681-1018) and Volga Bulgaria (early 10th century-1241). They derived from Oghuric-Turkic tribes, driven westward from Mongolia and south Siberia to the Pontic steppes in successive waves by turmoil associated with the Xiongnu (late 3rd cent. ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-820 Kubrat (Gk. Kobratos, called Kurt in the Slavo-Turko-Bulgar Imennik or Name-List of Khans, 20, derived from Turkic quvrat ‘to bring together’) Ruler of the *Onoghurs (Ononghundur) *Bulgars (c.605-42/65?). *John of *Nikiu (120, 47) reports that he became a Christian in ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-2674 Utrigurs (Utighurs) Oghur-Bulghar Turkic group, located south-east of the Don River, near the Sea of Azov, and traditional enemies of the related ... ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780198662778.001.0001/acref-9780198662778-e-4918 Bolgar, Tatarstan/Russia (Bulgar, Bulgar al-Cadid, Kuybyshev) By the 15th century it was known as Bulgar al-Cadid ‘New Bulgar’ after the Turkic-speaking Volga Bulgars. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780191905636.001.0001/acref-9780191905636-e-8397 Bulgars, Turkic, also Proto-Bulgarians, Pra-Bulgarians, a pastoral people, originally living in Central Asia. Swept westward in the great movement of steppe peoples ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780195046526.001.0001/acref-9780195046526-e-0850 Kuvrat (Κοβρα̑τος, according to Moravcsik, Byzantinoturcica 2:161f), khan of the Onogur Bulgars; died after 642. Patr. Nikephoros I mentions his revolt against the Avars and alliance with Herakleios; Kuvrat was granted ... www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100045529 Kubrat , of the royal Duloclan, ‘lord of the Ononghundur-Bulgars and Kotrags [Kutrigurs?]’ www.oxfordreference.com/search?q=Dulo+clan&searchBtn=Search&isQuickSearch=true Originally Asiatic nomads who inhabited the shores of the Black Sea at the end of the 5th century ad but after ad 679 they crossed the Danube and founded a state in the old province of Moesia. www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803095534628 www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199534043.001.0001/acref-9780199534043-e-582 The Volga Tatars live in the central and eastern parts of European Russia and in western Siberia. They are the descendants of the Bulgar and Kipchak Turkic tribes who inhabited the western wing of the Mongol Empire, the area of the middle Volga River. academic.oup.com/mbe/article/27/10/2220/963437 Chuvash is the sole living representative of the Bulgharic branch, one of the two principal branches of the Turkic family. oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.1093/oso/9780198804628.001.0001/oso-9780198804628-chapter-28 In the different classifications proposed so far, there is a wide consensus that the earliest split in the family was between the Bulgharic (also known as ‘Oghuric’) branch, which today only survives in Chuvash, and the Common Turkic branch, which is ancestral to all other contemporary Turkic languages. academic.oup.com/jole/article/5/1/39/5736268 Many Slavic tribes lived within the boundaries of the state, together with the proto-Bulgarians, a tribe of Turkic origin that had settled in the Balkan Peninsula at the end of the 7th century. www.britannica.com/biography/Boris-I The language of the European Huns is sometimes referred to as a Bulghar Turkic variety in general linguistic literature, but caution is needed in establishing its affiliations. www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/4CBA0E2CB74C8093EC1CA38C95067D55/S2513843X20000183a_hi.pdf/_div_class__title__Early_nomads_of_the_Eastern_Steppe_and_their_tentative_connections_in_the_West__div_.pdf In the Hunno-Bulgarian languages /r/ within a consonantic cluster tends to disappear projects.iq.harvard.edu/files/huri/files/vvi_n4_dec1982.pdf An earlier date for the separation of proto-Turkic, preceding 209 BC would support the identification of Xiongnu language with proto-Bulgharic or one of its subgroups, while a later date of separation would make its association with proto-Turkic more plausible. academic.oup.com/jole/article-pdf/5/1/39/32972809/lzz010.pdf The Bulgars were a Turkic tribal confederation that gave rise to the Balkan Bulgar and Volga Bulgar states.The ethynonym derives from the Turkish bulgha-,”to stir,mix,disturb,confuse.” books.google.com.tr/books?id=c788wWR_bLwC&pg=PA354&redir_esc=y&hl=tr#v=onepage&q=Bulgars&f=false (Harvard University Press) Turkish tribes who founded a kingdom (9th-12th century) in the region between the Volga and the Kama. www.larousse.fr/encyclopedie/divers/Bulgares_de_la_Volga_et_de_la_Kama/110545 The Bulgars,,Turkish people who were formed on the Don. www.universalis.fr/recherche/l/1/napp/23625 Although the Bulgars were originally a Turkic-speaking people from Asia, they merged with the Slavic tribes whom they conquered in the 7th cent. www.infoplease.com/encyclopedia/arts/language/linguistics/bulgarian-language

Bulgarians have absolutely nothing to do with Turkic Bulgars😂😂😂 just like Holy Roman Empire has nothing to do with Romans

@@papazataklaattiranimam BULGARIANS are not TURKS!!!

@@patlakakolev4165 Bulgarians are Slavic Balkanic not Turk for sure

@@papazataklaattiranimam When was Old Great Bulgaria the Ottoman empire wasn't founded!!! The Ottoman empire is founded at 1 299!!! How you don't understand??!!

If the topic is interesting to you, try to find information about which tribes opposed Rome for about 200 years, how many attempts they made to liberate their land, why Constantine the Great gave them autonomy without taxes. The truth is quite different from what is imposed.

Why does Turkey betray the Uighurs?