The Flawed Math Behind This Paper EXPOSED! 

Amazing explanation by Prakhar. Based on what I understood, here is a brief summary of his argument on how Mohit's definition is circular: 1. Mohit says that zero is not a number that denotes nothingness but a set that contains equal amount of positive and negative numbers. The problem with this definition is that you cannot define negative numbers without establishing zero as term for nothingness first, because the way negative numbers are defined is in terms of zero. For example -2 is defined as the number which if you add to 2 gives 0. Negative numbers do not mean anything without the concept of 0. 2. Mohit proves -(-a)=a with this reasoning: If from zero which is a set that contains equal amount of positive and negative numbers, you have to find out what -(-1) is you have to remove -1 and what you are left with is 1. Therefore -(-1)=1. Prakhar's point is if you take a = -1 and -a = -(-1), if you remove 'a' what you get is '-a' which is -(-1). You do not get 1. The only way you can get 1 is by assuming beforehand that -(-1)=1. Hence the circularity.

A new Era of academic discussions is starting on Indian RU-vid.... And you people are one of the pioneers of that here.... Kudos to you bhaiyo... Keep going all the best ...

We want creators like you science with adhira, be rational, bioshala, logical aayam and the great "Science journey" sir 🎯💯

I must commend you guys on taking this initiative. We seriously need such channel that discuss on scientific temperament and debunking pseudo religious blind claims.

Mohit GAPODA debunking ke pahle dusro ke channel pe jaake apne research ka khub showoff/dinge haak rha tha 😂😂😂 bechara debunk k bad mai 20 sal ka tha mujhe grammer nhi aati thi concept me bhi thodi galti hai ab aage se dursa research karunga

Zero means no magnitude that's why it is neither negative not positive. It's nothing.

00:07 वीडियो में गहन गति से मैथमेटिकल विवाद दिखाया गया। 01:23 University physics competition and flawed research paper 02:47 Developing skills and pushing oneself beyond limits 03:26 Acknowledging mistakes and accepting feedback 04:47 Media sensationalism affecting scientific temperament 05:30 Author admitted to flaws in a published paper. 07:04 The debate mechanism in video analytics 07:42 The statement that predatory journals are subjective is flawed. 09:04 Flawed paper got accepted despite multiple errors 09:50 Discussion about the potential list of Tree Genel Control F in the paper 11:30 Errors in calculations despite thorough review 12:12 The paper may have calculation mistakes but is well reviewed 13:38 हर साल होता है एसएसआई, अनुसंधान पोस्टरों को डूबाने के बाद। 14:22 Discussing the creator friend's concern about feasibility of a comment 16:35 Incorrect information can be harmful in scientific and mathematical experiments. 17:40 Speed of writing in the paper raises doubts 19:25 Debate around the flaws and acceptance of the paper 20:04 Importance of thorough research in academic settings 21:52 Attempting to prove the accuracy of a conjecture through mathematical research. 22:41 Addressing doubts and concerns in the paper 24:31 Confusion between pedagogy and mathematical content clarity 25:38 Pedagogy versus defining things are two different aspects. 27:39 Multiple definitions of multiplication in the paper 28:42 Flawed definition of the paper 30:47 Reinterpreting zero leads to inaccuracies in math 31:41 Understanding multiplikation and restrictive numbers 33:23 Criticism on personal attacks and math discussion. 34:01 Discussion on the flaws in the multiplying algorithms and negative time proofs 36:04 Challenging the reliance on intuition in mathematics 37:03 Importance of Mathematical Rigor in Formal Definitions 39:20 Reevaluation of zero as a number 40:33 Discussing the negative and positive signs in the context of mathematics 42:23 New definition of multiplication explained for 12-year-olds 43:27 Circular argument and counterpoint in definitions 45:26 Defining loss and negative numbers. 46:18 Defining negative and loss in terms of nothingness 48:23 Explaining the concept of second circularity in algebra 49:17 Explaining the concept of negative numbers and how they are defined. 51:10 Concept of zero with equal positive and negative amounts 52:14 The flawed definition of negative of negative 54:18 Examining the nature of negative of negative W+ 55:24 Documenting definitions and references for a research paper 57:04 Explaining the flaws in detail is crucial for understanding the circularity. 57:53 Pedagogy and mathematical research are distinct 59:32 Failure to explain fundamental definitions accurately 1:00:19 Misunderstanding of complex multiplication and rotation terms. 1:01:59 Discussing mathematical topics in a respectful manner 1:03:01 Misrepresentation and promotion in Indian mathematics 1:04:56 Zero multiplied by zero is undefined 1:05:50 Wrong reasoning leading to flawed conclusions 1:07:46 Exposing flaws in the mathematical analysis 1:08:29 Mistakes are part of learning 1:10:09 गलत आइडियाज और सहायकता के महत्व 1:11:08 Significance of mathematical proofs and Ramanujan's approach 1:12:58 Ramanujan considered a review with some key points 1:13:46 Importance of formal methods and proofs 1:15:39 Exploring the fundamental entities and mathematical concepts 1:16:29 Mathematical inconsistencies lead to flawed conclusions 1:18:14 Explaining the concept of negative numbers in domains 1:19:09 Understanding the concept of negative and positive numbers through easy pedagogy 1:21:03 Explaining the concept of negative numbers and real numbers 1:21:58 Multiplication of negative matrices can result in a positive matrix. 1:23:49 Cross product of vectors satisfies the property of natural numbers multiplication. 1:24:46 Binary operations explained using order logic 1:26:33 Multiplication behaves fundamentally different from addition. 1:27:23 Difference between matrix addition and multiplication algorithms 1:29:06 Difference between matrix multiplication and addition in brackets 1:30:13 The distinction between matrix multiplication and addition is fundamental. 1:32:08 Mathematically true concepts are derived using logical reasoning from a given set of axioms. 1:33:13 Inadequate evidence to support claims in research paper. 1:35:02 The flawed math in the paper has been exposed 1:35:48 Discussion on fake accounts & low engagement 1:37:10 Focus on ideas over people's intelligence or personality 1:37:48 Discussion on intellectual debates and formal debates 1:39:43 Simplify pedagogical concepts for better understanding 1:40:41 Identifying problems in the flawed construct 1:42:13 The video discusses the flaws in mathematical claims made by scholars. 1:42:57 Unified theory has solved many problems in particle physics and inflation. 1:44:42 Discussion on basic insights from the paper 1:45:31 Discussion about Insightful Conclusions 1:46:56 Evolution is not wrong, misunderstood by scientific community 1:47:46 Disputing claims of research result manipulation 1:49:21 The research paper contains fundamental misunderstandings. 1:50:32 Misinterpretation of negative times positive 1:52:08 Negative times negative results in positive 1:53:05 Institutions define general things using itself 1:54:44 Explaining the concept of zero and nothingness 1:55:55 Understanding zero time as multiplying by nothing 1:57:48 Discussion on research paper critique 1:58:27 Discussion about Prakhar's depth in mathematics and physics. 2:00:04 Discussion on Vedic Physics and Epic Evidence

This was really good. Keep it up Kshitij. 👍

Keep exposing these so called scientist 😂

Mohit ka Vedic carrier khatam hone wala hai 😅😂

Wow literally this is the end of mohit nice explanation by prakhar ❤️ keep educating the society and youth🌟

Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤

Absolutely loved prakhar's explantation. Spot on peer review. Keep up the good work

Amazing discussion. Learnt so many things. Love to kshitij and prakhar❤

Prakhar Bhai Ki Mathematical knowledge Bahut gajab hai❤️❤️ Kash Meri bhi hoti because Maths Is only subject jaha mujhe smjhne Mai bahut Time lag jaata hai Baaki In real world I understand Everything very Easily but why i stuck in maths , i don't know , maybe it's because Of kyuki mera interest Nahi tha bachpan me maths me But Astronomy me kaafi jyada tha .

BEST EXPLANATION IN BEST MANNER NICE VIDEO BROTHER♥️👍🏅 KEEP MOVING FORWARD 🇮🇳

Vigyan darshan & Sanatan reveals crying together in corner 😂

Science ko vedo se door hi rakhe ye log to achha hai vedo me ghanta science hai

bhai unke livestream k niche mere comments check kiye kisi ne😂? in thiests ki hypocrisy mai comment me hi nikaal skta hu , live ji jaroorat hi nhi h

PRAKHAR 🗿❤️

Bhai is hyper wale ka dyper ankit bhai ne faada h wo dekho maza ayega🤣😂ankit bhai k samne to bol bhi nhi paa rha tha

Good job kshitij and prakhar ❤ remember hamara uddesya bharat ko firse mahan banana hai bina tark pramad vigyan itihas siksha ke begair ye sab sambhav nhi h❤️aane wale samay me aap sabhi naam yaad kiya jayega👍

Talking politely doesn't make a person nice. He amount of propaganda Mohit spread is detrimental to society. Misleading information , and cleverness over it can't be applauded. Of course you guys aren't actually appreciating him. But let's not judge polite way of talking as the only character trait. With his actions without even saying he strengthens caste system

Thanks for exposing him🎉🎉🎉. Keep it up

And the vigyan darshan definition is complete blunder to mathmatics because then what is the difference in the set of real numbers and the zero because set of real numbers is (- ♾️ to +♾️) .

I am here after the 2nd debate

Phod diya Science is dope alwyas and forever

9 अक्टूबर वाले स्टीम में पेले गये वहां से भाग गया astro kshitij😂😂

maine paper padha, ek jagah par "expandation" likha tha, confuse ho gya fir 2 minute baad smjh aya ki bhai expansion likhna chahte the.

Hi guys, I have a feedback for you. Ye sab cheeze live me mat kiya karo. Ek video crisp rhegi. And point to point rhegi. Video k liye talking points rhenge to better analogies rhegi. As your guest mentioned he wanted to make a video on it. To I think vo usme zada clearly baat kar paate. I sensed that unke mind me bht saari arguments ek saath chl rhi thi. He did the best he could. But i think he has a lot to say, but live ki anxiety me kuch miss hua. I understand ki it's a lot of work to make a video on such discussions. Pr you people are doing something important. You should put your arguments clearly. You knew what you wanted to say. You probably made pointers. But you should've asked your guest to do the same. Or should've done it in a video format. Those people did it because unhe bas views chahiye. They care fck all about the Vedas or sanatan or mathematics. Ye dharmic RU-vidr bs views k bhookhe bhediye hai. Inko fark nhi pdta ki inki misinformations se kya ho skta h. Vimoh ka godi youtubers wali video explains it better. But they don't seek the truth, they don't want betterment of their religion. Unko views hi chahiye. Vo fame k bhookhe bachhe h. Kam mehnat karke clicks dharmic videos bnake milte h. You people are making a difference. Do it right. Vo log 8 ghante bhi live kr skte hai. Because unki stream me substance 5% hoga. But if you aim to make content for the betterment of society then do such content not on live. Time de hi rhe ho to achhe se do. Apna discussion karo with talking points, better analogies. Cover all ends. Kitna bhi humble ho lo, vo log aise hi h. Agr Mohit me sach me humility hoti to vo videos retract krta. Ya fir apni shortcomings address karta. It's good that you're cherry picking their good bits, so your audience don't stoop to their level. But don't forget that they are doing it deliberately.

Great Discussion 👍❤ From Ayodhya

Bharat ki parampra rahi h debates karna ....1000 sal ke pahle pura bharat buddhamay tha aur buddhist log debates karte the.....aap log acha kam kar rahe ho.....jinhe bawal lgta h vo jaye big boss dekhe

bhai app log bahat achha kam karrhey ho hamare Odisha me bahat bahat pseudoscience fela hua hey apki videos dekhke bo thode samjhenge sayad agar samajhna chahe to , warna bo to bohi pseudo scientists ke upare jyada bharosa karte hey

Bhai gaadi palat gyi kshitiz fas gya

Where are all sanatanis now 😂😂

मुझे बहुत अच्छा लगा की हमारे देश के युवा गणित के सिद्धांतों पर अच्छा चर्चा कर रहे हैं। बस मुझे यह कहना है की हमलोग सारा ज्ञान जब विदेशों से मोहर लग कर आता है उसी को सही क्यों मानते हैं? क्या हमने अपने देश के पुराने ज्ञान को अच्छे से समझ लिया? आज परमाणु जिसे atom कहते है वो जब विदेशों से आया तब तुरंत हम स्वीकार किए लेकिन ऋषि कनाड के ज्ञान को नहीं पढ़ा। उन्होंने परम अणु के बारे में बताया जो की आज के atom से भी कई गुना छोटा होता है। लेकिन चूंकि वो संस्कृत में है और हमको संस्कृत से दूर कर दिया गया। शिवकर बापू जी तलपड़े विमान के ऊपर काम किए लेकिन उसपर हम शोध नही कर रहे क्योंकि वो भारतीय हैं। राधानाथ सिकदर जी जिन्होंने माउंट एवरेस्ट की ऊंचाई 1931 में सबसे पहले नाप कर बताया लेकिन उसका क्रेडिट अंग्रेजों ने एक अंग्रेज अधिकारी को दिया उसपर कोई शोध नही कोई वीडियो नही। अब जरा वर्तमान विषय की बात कर लें... भारत के एक युवा मोहित गौर ने आधुनिक गणित में - - के गुणा पर एक चर्चा की और उसको समैक्यम खम, आलोप इत्यादि सिद्धांतों की रोशनी में व्याख्या करने का कोशिश किया और आपलोग भी भारत के युवा है उस सिद्धांत पर चर्चा करना शुरू किए। अब जरा यह बताइए जिस अंदाज में इस वीडियो और इसके पहले के वीडियो में आपलॉग मुस्कुरा कर चर्चा कर रहे हैं वो किसी का मजाक उड़ने जैसा ज्यादा लग रहा है। अब जरा पुराने ग्रंथों के ज्ञान पर बात कर लें। आज के गणित में यह शून्य को जो कुछ नही कहा जा रहा है यह केवल इस भौतिक जगत में दृश्यमान चीजों के परिप्रेक्ष्य में कहा जा रहा है। अब इसका क्या यदि शून्य से ही सम्पूर्ण shristi ki उत्पत्ति हुई हो? अब इसका क्या की शून्य से निकलकर शून्य में समा जाना है अगर यह यूनिवर्स का सिद्धांत हो तो? अब इसका क्या की थियरी of evolution कहता है की क्रमिक विकास के चलते आज का मनुष्य, जीव जंतु सब बने है? जो की एकदम गलत सिद्धांत है क्योंकि एक निर्जीव से सजीव अपने आप क्रमिक विकास से कैसे बनेगा यह अभी तक नही पता चला। क्रमिक विकास में म्यूटेशन से एक वायरस नया वायरस तो बन सकता है लेकिन कुत्ता, बिल्ली, मनुष्य तो नही बन सकता। बातें बहुत सी हैं। अगर भारत के साइंटिफिक टेंपरामेंट को समझना है तो पहले अपने ancient knowledge को समझना होगा। संस्कृत का ज्ञान लेकर हर पुस्तक का अध्ययन करना होगा तब जाकर डिस्कशन होगा तो सही दिशा में हम पहुंचेंगे।

I appreciate how Kshitij and Prakhar refrained from personal attacks and instead viewed this as a challenge to comprehend the given information and uncover any hidden agendas in the paper. Great work guys ❤❤

It's nothing but making the whole country a laughing stock... anyway your channel is working great ...keep up gud work

मैने 5 अक्टूबर के विज्ञान दर्शन का वीडियो देखा जिसके बाद aaplog यह वार्तालाप कर रहे हैं जिसमें aaplog बोल रहे हैं की केवल विज्ञान दर्शन में आपके पुराने किसी रिसर्च पर चर्चा की जा रही है, लेकिन जरा उस पूरे वीडियो को 2 घंटे 17 मिनट्स के बाद से देखिए जिसमें आपके सारे उठाए गए प्रश्नों के बारे में बात कीया गया है। जिसमें आईआईटी के रिसर्चर भी बैठे हैं। अब आप हायर क्लास की गणित को मोहित के रिसर्च से जोड़ रहे है। जो की गलत है। मोहित ने अपना रिसर्च स्कूल लेवल 12th tak ke विद्यार्थियों को मल्टीप्लिकेशन के टर्म्स के बारे में किया है। Aaplog जरा समैक्यम खम को जरा समझाइए

At 54At 54:54 Zero is a set of {+ & -} if we subtract -1 then Reamin set is negative of negative = -(-1) Am I correct 😅?

Great discussion on maths unlike some other channel how just do trolling

👍 keep going.. brother 😊

We want debate Debate is last final round

astro kshitj ki awaaz bahut low hai and prakhar ki awaaz bahut high hai ..isiliye volume up down karni padrahi hai video me... please reupload if editing is possible

1) we can have negative numbers without zero eg=> like we know positive and negative charges and they cancel out each other we don't need nothingness here to define +ve and -ve quantity 2) if 0 = +ve infinity + -ve infinity Arg1 Zero is a set equal amount of +ve and equal amount of -ve Arg2 +ve number or charge is always canceled by -ve and vice versa 0 = +ve infinity + -ve infinity Remove number a = -1 Add both side 1 +ve 1 =-a Hence -a = 1 No issues observed Waiting for your reply I am just curious about topic Not taking sides like vedic wale vs modern science wale

1:28:20 wow moment.

Prakhar is Legend 💞💞💞 Prakhar is genius ❤❤

Continue this type of debunking , huge scope he

Mohit denied evolution theory

Kstij bhai kisi social media me ho kya ap?

I think Mohit's new definition is linguistically well presented to tech to students and did anyone notice it follows the same method of Exponentials? Like it set 1 as anchor for repeated multiplication the same way that definition set 0 as anchor for repeated summation. 🤔 PS: Another good intuition for negative multiplication is to define attributes of numbers (without adding rotation), like negative numbers have attributes to change state/domain and positive numbers have attributes to stay in same state/domain; if we multiply any negative then it will change privious number's state/domain therefore if a negative numbers get multipled by other then it will change it's domain to positive axis. This is same as assuming of N - (-M) = N + M (In that definitions, it uses this too)

Amazing ❤

Prakhar's voice issue

Mohit ne pura video bhi banaya hai jo s topic par 0 me + aur - dono equal hai lekin wo AVYAKT hai Usko define nahi kiya ja sakta

Bhai tum dono ki bate sunne ke bad me ak debate dekhna chata hu bs ab aap log debate krna koe video mt bnao 😑vrna tum log smy khrab kr rhe ho

ये टुन्नीयो की ट्रोल आर्मी किसी की नहीं सुनती,वू सीधा कमैंट्स सुरु कर देते है.. जैसा की इस वीडियो मे भी दिख रहा है..

Good work sir

बेटा जब सनातन रिवील्स ने तुम्हारा पेज खोलने शुरू किया तब तो तुझ में कुछ अकल आई नहीं तो इंग्लिश का पेपर चेक कर रहे थे और तुम्हारे तो फिजिक्स पकड़ा गया तब तो अकल आई है

Pahley expose fir expose ka expose fir expose ke expose ka expose! Wtf....🤯

Bhai kal Sanatan Reveals channel pe Maine tumhare paper ka Dubunk dekha 😂 aur woh dekhne k baad mujhe tum par jyada hassi aati hai... Yeh kaam kabhi physics expert ko laake apne paper ka bhi review Karo

47:14

54:46 😂

45 - -16 _______ Usme ( - )aur (-) ko ham log (+ )kyu karte hai ye samjhao

kshtiz bhai reply karo please kya aap dono discuss karme ke liye unke chennal ( not sanatan reveals) vigyan darshan pe bhi ja skte ho na? aap 2 baar apne Chennal par content bana chuke ho pehle hi apne chennal pe i hope aap views ke bhukhe to nhi ho ki bar bar khudke yaha hi karo..and ha why you again and again usinh debate word. Why not discussion word?

आचार्य जी भी स्ट्रिंग थ्योरी और बिग बैंग को नाकार रहे हैं और यह वाला बोल रहा है कि यह वेदों में बिग बैंग खोज रहा है शब्दों को इंटरप्रेट करना अच्छा जानते हैं

We already saw your embarassment in that live... Please don't try to cover up now

Mohit Ka Bhi 4 varsh pahle ka tha par Use research paper Ko Theek karne ka chance nahin tha Par 8 saal baad Mohit ne Tumhe Bataya To Hi theek kar paye. Pahle Khud ko dekhna chahiye. Lol

Kstij bhagode

Bhai ek rebuttal se hi itni maturity aagayi aapme😂

Bhai apko don't likhna ata nhi aur aye hi apni tareke se expose krne. Don't worry mohit aur research papers likhega.

इस stream meh kshijit ka face dekne layak tha😂.

Someones(mohit) paper is discussed in foreign universities aur koi youtube pe bakchodi kar ke khud ko mathematician samjhta hai 🤡

Bhai tu apna camera band kar deta aur Prakhar bhai ka camera chalu rakhta to achche se samjh aata Ghanta samjh nahi aaya

Tum hi dedo ager wo galat hai to.....

Tumhare sare arguments kamjor h

Mohit ne pant me hi hag diya bhai ye toh shuru hote hi khatm ho gya 😂😂😂😂

bhai tu mohit se debate karna acchi bat hai lekin nek irade se karna , galat irade se mat kar tera career end ho sakta hai 😁 Aapko bhavishya ki shubhkamnaye 🎉

Matlab tum bheemte kisi had tak gir jaoge 😅😅😅, dekho bheemte chimte ne apna nam bhi aryan vala rakhaa hai

❤

Prakhar Bhai Really sorry , Apki argument baseless laga mujhe , 1 hi baat bar bar bol rahe jiska koi point nahi banta , Aisa laga apko aap apni baat ko prove karne k liye jabarjati ka argument de rahe ho

Astro bhai tera paper dhekha sanatana reveals ke Chanel pe khud to ek sentence thik se likh nahi sakta . Psychics mein silver medal sale 20% logo ko mila hai tume kya ukhad liya uska pepar review hoke published huya hai, tera paper to reject huya hai calculation errors ke wajah se. (Comment delete hoa to samajh jaunga tu daar gaya)

❤😂

Bhai pehle negative positive ka mtlb smjho tumhe to wo bhi nhi pata

Nice😂😂😂😂 sala astro kshitji ko ghnta smjh nhi aa rha aur na prokhar ko smjh aa rha ki wo kya bol rha hai. Jo tumne video bnaya hai wo zero hai aur ese hi mohit ne smjhaya hai.

Bruh tu pehle khudke research papers dekh le 😂😂

All chimta group active 😅.. nastik ki aad me ,,

Don't get manipulated out by these stupid youtubers . overall they are garbage reviewing some other garbage . No Offence ! 5:20

Chimta group nile kabutaro , hinduo ki piche padoge fir piche hi rah jaoge fir future me rudali rona rouge aaji ham piche rh gye hame padhne nhi diya gya😅

Dum hai toh debate karle 😂

Bhai, aapne apna research paper delete kyu kar diya lindkdin se 😂

Finally ❤ 🫡 love you all rational creators...bina koi faltu baaton ke to the point best counter💫

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-3LfDORrPbBM.htmlsi=4r7dxRdgWjUFEhsn Kshitij destroyed by aryaveera

Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤

Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤

Bahat hi achha education Diya bro ।।। Love from odisha ❤❤❤