Тёмный

The Flying Bullet That Shattered Aviation's Limits Forever 

Dark Skies
Подписаться 631 тыс.
Просмотров 138 тыс.
50% 1

The morning sun glinted off the sleek, bullet-shaped fuselage of the Bell X-1 as it sat poised on the runway at Muroc Army Air Field. It was October 14, 1947, and inside the cramped cockpit, Captain Chuck Yeager ran through his pre-flight checks with practiced precision. His square jaw was set with determination, belying the gravity of the mission ahead. The 24-year-old pilot had already made a name for himself as a fearless flying ace in World War 2, but today, a new challenge lay ahead, one that many believed impossible: to fly faster than the speed of sound.
Yeager's hands moved deftly over the controls, his keen eyes scanning the cloud of dials and gauges before him. The X-1's design was a marvel of aeronautical engineering, its form following function with ruthless efficiency. Every inch of space not occupied by the pilot himself was crammed with fuel, wiring, or instrumentation. As Yeager settled into his seat, he could feel the latent power of the 6,000-pound thrust rocket engine at his back, ready to hurl man and machine into the unknown.
The significance of this flight was not lost on the young pilot from West Virginia. If successful, it would mark a watershed moment in aviation history, arguably as important as the Wright brothers' first powered flight at Kitty Hawk. Yet a shadow of doubt lingered. Some experts warned of a so-called "sound barrier," an invisible wall in the sky that could tear any aircraft to pieces. A year before, British test pilot Geoffrey de Havilland Junior had lost his life before even reaching Mach 1. As Yeager prepared to push the throttle forward, he knew he was about to challenge not just the laws of physics but the very limits of human endeavor…
---
Join Dark Skies as we explore the world of aviation with cinematic short documentaries featuring the biggest and fastest airplanes ever built, top-secret military projects, and classified missions with hidden untold true stories. Including US, German, and Soviet warplanes, along with aircraft developments that took place during World War I, World War 2, the Korean War, the Vietnam War, the Cold War, the Gulf War, and special operations mission in between.
As images and footage of actual events are not always available, Dark Skies sometimes utilizes similar historical images and footage for dramatic effect and soundtracks for emotional impact. We do our best to keep it as visually accurate as possible.
All content on Dark Skies is researched, produced, and presented in historical context for educational purposes. We are history enthusiasts and are not always experts in some areas, so please don't hesitate to reach out to us with corrections, additional information, or new ideas.

Опубликовано:

 

28 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 433   
@Brandon_Hisey_music
@Brandon_Hisey_music Месяц назад
My grandma was good friends with Chuck Yeager, when I would go visit her in Palmdale, he would always drop by unannounced, and for a long time I just thought he was some old guy they knew, after a while when I was into airplanes , my grandmother explained to me who he was.. She also knew Pete Knight, I met him at her funeral, he was Senator at the time...that was two weeks before he passed away..
@SCRB1GR3D98
@SCRB1GR3D98 Месяц назад
I'm assuming u mean william knight?
@TheOsfania
@TheOsfania Месяц назад
I remember that.😊
@carpballet
@carpballet Месяц назад
@@TheOsfania I knew Brandon’s grandma. We used to hang out with Chuck. A lot of drinkin with those two… That and driving fast.
@acb9896
@acb9896 Месяц назад
Dont you mean Bobby Knight? Or was it Michael Knight... He had that cool car..
@justincase5272
@justincase5272 21 день назад
Neat! I ran into Chuck Yeager at a hardware store in California. Fairly awestruck, I still managed to say, "Hello."
@ramirogarcia1967
@ramirogarcia1967 Месяц назад
I can say this.. I actually met Mr. Yeager, he drove me around the Indianapolis Motors Speedway in the pace car as part of a promotional event for journalists. I was 19 at the time. Wisdom says Don't met your heroes, but I am glad I did.
@PetesGuide
@PetesGuide Месяц назад
Agreed. I got to meet and become good friends with my childhood hero. He wasn’t Yeager, but he was a rocket scientist who had design oversight on Apollo, Werner on speed dial, a dozen patents, and did a whole boatload of crazy things everyone said were impossible. Spent more time hanging out with him than my own dad, and he was a huge inspiration.
@rickradix7464
@rickradix7464 Месяц назад
You put the right stuff into this one. Very informative.
@alanhilder1883
@alanhilder1883 Месяц назад
Well the writer of "The right stuff" almost destroyed the 'mission' by a dangerous horse riding incident. He was lucky. Did his attitude to the mission mean he really wasn't the right stuff? Was that what is wanted in serious research?
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@alanhilder1883 He also destroyed the NF-104 years later from similar bullheadedness.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 26 дней назад
@@alanhilder1883 On the 9th of April 1945, Messerschmitt Me-262 pilot Hans Mutke, part of the Ergänzungs-Jagdgeschwader 2 (EJG 2) took off from Flugplatz Lagerlechfeld and broke the sound barrier in a full-power 40 deg. supersonic dive from 40,000 feet. Although Mutke claims he was not the first Me-262 pilot to reach Mach 1 in a dive, Chuck Yeager confirmed his detailed written accounts from 1945, and he is the first man to document a supersonic flight and live to tell the tale. The same year the German A4b rocket plane would achieve Mach 4 in flight tests (unmanned) but the war ended before manned test flights were scheduled to begin.
@paulveenings6861
@paulveenings6861 Месяц назад
The very first episode of Quantum Leap was on the lead up to this flight. Just a little trivia 🙂
@brj_han
@brj_han Месяц назад
The news that Yeager broke the speed of sound was broken that night when he got his free steak dinner at Pancho Barnes place for being the first pilot to break the speed of sound, lol.
@MothaLuva
@MothaLuva Месяц назад
The Happy Bottom Riding Club.
@brj_han
@brj_han Месяц назад
@@MothaLuva Yep. Woulda loved to have had a few drinks there...
@mattadams7922
@mattadams7922 Месяц назад
Way bad name but ya know it's whatever lol. 😂 I'm sure they knew and they did it to keep the riff raff at bay.
@Phaaschh
@Phaaschh Месяц назад
And hence the expression "there was a lot at steak"?😊
@wilburfinnigan2142
@wilburfinnigan2142 Месяц назад
Interesting that they showed Bell test pilot "Tex" Johnston who later went to work at Boeing testing the B47 B52 and the 707/KC135 and is well known for his barrel rolling the Dash 80, proof of concept for the 707/KC135 over the hydroplane course in Seattle Aug 1955. call into the office of pres of Boeing Bill Allen he asked Tex point blank "What the hell do you think you were doing???" Tex answered simply..."Selling airplanes.....sir...." and sell airplanes they did. seems Tex had worked with the USAF on the B47 "TOSS" bomb delivery of doing a high speed loop up and releasing, or tossing the bomb and the plane continued in the loop and at the top the plane was rolled upright and dived away from the atomic blast. seems also the program was abandoned when they started tearing wings off planes. RIP Tex Johnston......one hell of a pilot....
@thehark6247
@thehark6247 Месяц назад
he was legend
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 Месяц назад
Because of what Johnston did with the Dash-80, it's been traditional for the CEO to tell test pilots when they take a new airplane up, "No loops."
@wilburfinnigan2142
@wilburfinnigan2142 Месяц назад
@@katherineberger6329 BUT...... did you know every plane built since has been "unofficially" rolled. had a friend, a Boeing mechanic on the 747 that personally witnessed a 747 barrel rolled ,he was on it !!!! on a test flight. they just did not advertise it.
@razor1uk610
@razor1uk610 Месяц назад
@@wilburfinnigan2142 ..indeed so! ..doing it once, even unofficially, is a good way add flight-stress miles/hours to an airframe in a semi-gentle manner, while testing the balance & feel of control harmonization, and to test a designs 'over-engineering' factor is relatively correct. If any aircraft cannot survive a barrel roll &/or a loop, it likely cannot survive much of gusting windshear or any bad to very poor weather conditions either, let alone landing askew.
@raytribble8075
@raytribble8075 Месяц назад
It never occurred to me how the B29/X1 combo reminds me of the Japanese G4M Betty Bomber and Ohka. Remarkable times around the X1
@billmullins6833
@billmullins6833 Месяц назад
Slight correction: Yeager did not (could not, actually) "push the throttle forward". The rocket engines on the X-1 were not throttleable. Instead the XLR11 rocket engine had 4 combustion chambers each producing 1,500 lbs of thrust which could be turned on or off individually. The film "The Right Stuff" accurately depicts Yeager flipping switches one at a time to accelerate the craft.
@Rotorhead1651
@Rotorhead1651 Месяц назад
They literally mentioned that early on in the video, so quit nitpicking.
@Rotorhead1651
@Rotorhead1651 Месяц назад
They literally mentioned that early on in the video, so quit nitpicking the script.
@inthemoment9910
@inthemoment9910 Месяц назад
You already said that.​@@Rotorhead1651
@williamzk9083
@williamzk9083 Месяц назад
The Walther engines on the Me 163 were fully throttleable
@billmullins6833
@billmullins6833 Месяц назад
@@williamzk9083 Okay but the engines on the X-1 were not. Your point?
@Mrjonblakely
@Mrjonblakely Месяц назад
The X-1 did not have a throttle as mentioned at 1:40. Four toggle switches ignited the four combustion chambers of the rocket engines. The four ignition chambers were either on or off and thrust could be adjusted by the number of switches activated. The cockpit was pressurized (4:50) with the nitrogen that was also used to pressurize the fuel tanks. The pilot breathed oxygen through a oxygen mask. A system that would surely not be approved by the man rating board today! The visibility for landing was not good with the original windshield which contributed to several nose gear failures. The nose gear was not very strong and you have a picture of a nose wheel failure on the X-1E with the newer canopy. Thanks for running a picture of my dad at 5:13
@PetesGuide
@PetesGuide Месяц назад
Four people in that photo! Which was your dad?
@Mrjonblakely
@Mrjonblakely Месяц назад
@@PetesGuide NACA Research Test Pilot, John H Griffith
@PetesGuide
@PetesGuide Месяц назад
@@Mrjonblakely from left to right, 1-4, what number?
@Mrjonblakely
@Mrjonblakely Месяц назад
@@PetesGuide Number 3, I thought by mentioning pilot that it would narrow it down for you.
@PetesGuide
@PetesGuide Месяц назад
@@Mrjonblakely Oh! I just assumed that would have been Chuck, and didn’t read or look carefully! Yeager’s autobiography was one of my favorite books as a kid. And I’ve actually been in the under-pool restaurant they used in The Right Stuff. What was it like having a test pilot as a dad?
@charlesachurch7265
@charlesachurch7265 Месяц назад
Excellent presentation thanks xxx.
@patrickgriffitt6551
@patrickgriffitt6551 7 дней назад
On one of my tours in Spain i was lucky enough to meet. Chuck Yeager and also Robin Olds( i have his autograph). That was more than a few years ago.
@glorybound7599
@glorybound7599 Месяц назад
Not too bad for a pilot without a college degree. Chuck Yeager, retired as a Brigadier General and was a WWII ace.
@WilliamMurphy-b6v
@WilliamMurphy-b6v 7 дней назад
Does every bullet need a college degree?
@marcothommen2484
@marcothommen2484 Месяц назад
There was a demon that lived in the air. They said whoever challenged him would die. Their controls would freeze up, their planes would buffet wildly, and they would disintegrate. The demon lived at Mach 1 on the meter, 750 miles an hour, where the air could no longer move out of the way. He lived behind a barrier through which they said no man could ever pass. They called it: The sound barrier. Then, they built a small plane, the X1, to try and break the sound barrier. And men came to the High Desert in California to ride it. They were called test pilots. And no one knew their names. October 14th 1947, a WWll fighter ace named Charles Elwood "Chuck" Yeager chased that ol' demon that lived beyond the barrier! That was the day the demon on the mach meter ceased to exist...
@ramirogarcia1967
@ramirogarcia1967 Месяц назад
Do you have any beemans?? I might have me a stick. Well loan me some, Ill pay you back later.. Fair enough.
@richardbeckenbaugh1805
@richardbeckenbaugh1805 29 дней назад
The sound barrier had previously been broken by several P-47 pilots diving away from dogfights in WW2. The shock wave would freeze the controls but the P-47 had hydraulicly boosted controls that allowed it to come out of the dive gradually. One P-47 pilot reported that he dove away from a Fockewulf 190 at 35,000 feet and finally was able to pull completely out of the dive at treetop level. The plane had extensive damage to the airframe and was scrapped on returning to base.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 26 дней назад
@@richardbeckenbaugh1805 amazing if true! I've read that fair few late mark spitfire and Mustangs were taken closer and closer to mach 1 at the end of the war.......
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 22 дня назад
​@@laurencedawson7754*Messerschmitt Me-262 pilot Hans Mutke on April 9th 1945 took of from flugplatz Lagerlechfeld and in a 40 deg full power dive at 39,000 feet broke the sound barrier and passed through his shock wave.* *On October 14th Chuck Yeager confirmed Mutke's written account.*
@justincase5272
@justincase5272 21 день назад
The demon lived along asymmetrical propagation of the mach wavefront moving rearward over the wing as the aircraft accelerated.
@Bob-qk2zg
@Bob-qk2zg Месяц назад
I never get tired of this story. 👍🇺🇸♥️
@BrianBozz
@BrianBozz 11 дней назад
They don’t ever include the radio transmissions that Yeager described shining metallic spheres that were traveling faster than he was,like he was sitting still…
@madeleyinc
@madeleyinc 4 дня назад
I remember watching these tests as a kid, if i remember correctly, one pilot who crashed had six million dollars spent on reconstructing his body.
@MikeBaxterABC
@MikeBaxterABC Месяц назад
8:34 I'd imagine the vast majority of non battle, flying, aircraft breakups, are decidedly unexpected.
@jasyamaha
@jasyamaha Месяц назад
Great production. That photo @ 13:50 is fantastic.
@glorybound7599
@glorybound7599 Месяц назад
Showing the plane would be better than click bait flying saucers 🛸 which don’t exist.
@mitseraffej5812
@mitseraffej5812 Месяц назад
Yeager may have been the first to fly faster than sound but the William Bridgman, the US Navy’s test pilot of the same era exceeded Mach 2. His autobiography “ The Lonely Sky” is a fascinating read.
@SummerCrowfpv
@SummerCrowfpv 22 дня назад
Yeager would have laughed himself silly over the monologue at the beginning of this video
@teto85
@teto85 27 дней назад
In 1984 a friend was working for John Glenn's run for president. My ex-wife and I went to see "The Right Stuff" with him and his wife. After the show he asked me if I had changed my mind on who to vote for in the upcoming primary. I told him I was going to write in Chuck Yeager.
@stephenwalton9646
@stephenwalton9646 Месяц назад
Funny how these documentary folks never talk to people who had to work with him. Let’s just say he didn’t have a reputation as a,”People person.” By any means. If you get away from the PR and self promotion the picture changes radically. On a completely different note, the glide tests of the X1 at McCoy AFB are an interesting story. It landed short one day and the Bell folks rebuilt it in thirty days. Simple rugged aircraft.
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy Месяц назад
It's that time again.
@starfish370
@starfish370 Месяц назад
I don't know if the Americans knowledge was "merged " with the data that Miles Aircraft had accumulated, however, the designer of the M52, Dennis Bancroft and the Test Pilot,Captain Eric Brown said that the project was abruptly cancelled for reasons unknown. About 10 years ago the Discovery Channel made a documentary about it and can be seen on RU-vid.
@michaelshore2300
@michaelshore2300 Месяц назад
All details of Miles 52 passed to Bell
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 Месяц назад
The Miles M52 project, sadly, was canceled because the British government simply did not have the money to pursue it to its end. The British economy was absolutely fucked from 1946 to 1954 and didn't really recover until the early 60s.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Never happened... the Miles M.52 never existed, and no completed plans were ever found, it is pure British science fiction.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
@@michaelshore2300 No details to pass, the whole rumor made up by Dennis Bancroft who received stolen funds for the M.52 program
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
@@katherineberger6329 The money was all stolen by Dennis Bancroft, Frank Whittle and others who were shareholders in Miles Aircraft and who embezzled funds earmarks for the M.52 and other programs.
@stevea9604
@stevea9604 Месяц назад
The most amazing thing…The aircraft controls were bicycle chains…The Wright brothers started out as bicycle mechanics…
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 29 дней назад
The most amazing thing is the X-1's _Fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator..._ copied directly from the World's first jet fighter, the Messerschmitt Me-262. it's the Me-262's Horizontal Stabilator that allowed the X-1 to maintain attitude control at supersonic speeds.
@SPak-rt2gb
@SPak-rt2gb Месяц назад
Hey Ridley you got any Beemans
@fw1421
@fw1421 Месяц назад
I thought the Yeager X-1 was at the Air And Space Museum on the National Mall?
@Redstar-f4e
@Redstar-f4e Месяц назад
The mind sets in those days, with these men, we're on a whole other level than today. Today, seems like 'something' is missing from the men & women for pushing science to the limits of greatness. Maybe it's fear.
@theofficialdiamondlou2418
@theofficialdiamondlou2418 Месяц назад
Trivia question. No cheating. Searching is a foul. Who was the pilot of the B-29 the day Chuck broke the sound barrier ?
@jerryg53125
@jerryg53125 Месяц назад
Bob Cardenas
@wallyschmidt77
@wallyschmidt77 Месяц назад
Bob Hoover flew chase, didn't he?
@jerryg53125
@jerryg53125 Месяц назад
@@wallyschmidt77 Yes Bob Hoover flew chase.
@brygry
@brygry Месяц назад
These videos could be half the length if he wouldn't waffle on and find the need to repeat everything twice.
@rickbullock4331
@rickbullock4331 Месяц назад
The British were brilliant in engineering too. When Canada was designing/building the Avro Arrow during the mid 50’s, it was mostly British personnel doing the work. Canada also had brilliant engineers but Britain started the ball rolling. When Diefenbaker’s Government cancelled the Arrow in ‘59, the U.S. got an influx of highly qualified aeronautical engineers from Canada which, accelerated the U.S. space program.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
Not when it came to supersonic aircraft, the UK lagged behind Germany, America, Soviet Union and France. Britain would not even begin to construct its first supersonic aircraft wind tunnel laboratory at RAE Bedford until late 1947. America had leaped ahead by transferring the German aerospace industry en masse back to the United States after the war. Key to this was the dismantling of the RLM's _Luftfahrtforschungsanstalt_ supersonic wind tunnel laboratories at Braunschweig and shipping them to White Oak Virginia. The Mach 14 Wind tunnel #9 designed and constructed by Nazi engineers is still used by NASA today. These supersonic wind tunnels were used for countless American aircraft and missile programs and was used by NASA for the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo space programs.. Cheers!
@rickbullock4331
@rickbullock4331 Месяц назад
@@WilhelmKarsten , if you say so. Germany was definitely way ahead of the game during the war.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
@@rickbullock4331 *The Germans, Americans, French, Soviets and the Swedish all flew supersonic before the British... thus the motivation to create false British narratives that suggests that programs like the Miles M.52 were more advanced and often imply they actually built a supersonic aircraft in 1947.* *We know from official court documents that there was never any jet aircraft called the M.52.* *The British have gone to great lengths to fabricate this false narrative and insert Britain into the development history of supersonic aircraft that simply never happened.*
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@WilhelmKarsten The first supersonic aircraft Germany ever made was the Panavia Tornado. It had NO experience with supersonic aerodynamics other than highly theoretical.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
@@calvinnickel9995 *The German RLM's top secret LFA or **_Luftfahrtforschungsanstalt_** supersonic wind tunnel laboratories in Braunschweig built in 1935 was the first and only supersonic wind tunnels to exist anywhere in the world during WW2.* *The Germans buit the Mach 4 capable A4b rocket plane which flew in 1945.* *The Messerschmitt Me-262 was the first jet aircraft to fly supersonic in a powered dive and not crash.* *Any questions there lad?*
@lightbox617
@lightbox617 26 дней назад
Is there any substance to the rumors that some pilots of F86 jets had broken the barrier during the Korean War?
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 26 дней назад
Not a rumor, it is absolutely true. The F-86 Sabre could (like the Me-262) reach supersonic in a powered dive at the right altitude and atmospheric conditions. The Sabre and the Bell X-1 were both developed using data and parts from the Me-262. The first woman to fly supersonic 46-year-old Jackie Cochran broke the sound barrier in a F-86 on May 18, 1953,
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 25 дней назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke go on then, I'll bite- which parts exactly from the 262 went into the X1? We have already discussed the stabilator which the 262 did not have as proven elsewhere in this chat...
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 25 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 The electric powered fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator. The British did not invent the stabilator... this completely false myth has been soundly debunked. Germany invented the powered Stabilator, and it was first used on the Messerschmitt Me-262, and aircraft a decade ahead of anything the British had at the time. Its the parts that allowed the Me-262 to reach Mach 1 in a powered dive and the Bell X-1 to reach Mach 1 in level flight. The British would not achieve supersonic flight until the 1950's
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 19 дней назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke timelines are discussed elsewhere - can't have happened my friend
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 19 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 The Messerschmitt Me-262 is the world's first jet aircraft to have a power assisted Horizontal Stabilator. The Miles M.52 does not exist, its a hoax!
@auwz66
@auwz66 Месяц назад
Just think about this for a minute. The X1 went from sub sonic to a Mach 3 possible aircraft in the space of 6-7 years. 10 years later the X15 was doing nearly Mach 7. 70 years have passed and we are still expected the believe thats it - thats as fast as we go.... in fact we are slowing down, as the SR71 is retired.... yeah,,, right.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 29 дней назад
Engineers have reached the limits of fluid dynamics and the limitations of aircraft traveling inside the Earth's atmosphere, higher speeds can only be practically achieved in the vacuum of space.
@auwz66
@auwz66 29 дней назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Possibly. My personal view is that its likely novel technologies which pivot away from traditional thrust based aircraft were probably in development from the 90s. The documented dual / tri cycle engines that we know about are in my view old technology. The holy grail of unlimited speed, invisibility and indestructability are just too tempting for these guys not to at least give it a go. Just my 7 cents.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 29 дней назад
@@auwz66 Thrust is not the real problem, overcoming the heat caused by the friction of air against the aircrafts outer surfaces is the problem. higher speeds can only be maintained if solutions to managing this heat are found, solutions that may not be possible due to the limits of physics itself. Spacecraft have already proved to be faster in the vacuum of space which is devoid of the air that causes both heat and drag,
@patrickgriffitt6551
@patrickgriffitt6551 7 дней назад
I had heard that the F-111 had a timer to use when supersonic at low altitude to warn of heat weakening the airframe. As I said 'heard'. Can confirm or deny?
@Idontknow4
@Idontknow4 Месяц назад
3:10 small thing but N.A.C.A is pronounced by saying N A C A and not naca but you say nasa not N A S A
@acb9896
@acb9896 Месяц назад
Potatoe Tomahto..
@Idontknow4
@Idontknow4 Месяц назад
@@acb9896 close enough
@sonof4rt
@sonof4rt Месяц назад
not much focus on the german pioneers to the rocket ship there bud
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
Or the German Horizontal Stabilator system used in the Bell X-1..
@sonof4rt
@sonof4rt Месяц назад
@@WilhelmKarsten or rap music
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
@@sonof4rt *MC Torch!!!* Representing Heildelberg Baby!
@manuelcastaneda7838
@manuelcastaneda7838 20 дней назад
Hitler's personal pilot '' a petite lady " was sent as payload on a V2 rocket to report flight instability.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 20 дней назад
The German A4b rocket plane successfully flew Mach 4 in 1945 (unmanned) and the war ended before manned test flights were scheduled to begin.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 18 дней назад
@@manuelcastaneda7838 any reports on what happened to her!!
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 17 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 It's a joke... just like your RU-vid comments.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 16 дней назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke no, really!!!
@mingfanzhang4600
@mingfanzhang4600 Месяц назад
😊😊😊
@mingfanzhang8927
@mingfanzhang8927 Месяц назад
😊
@glorybound7599
@glorybound7599 Месяц назад
It’s amazing that a straight wing plane achieved such a feat.
@sebcam9498
@sebcam9498 Месяц назад
F104 is also a straight wing design
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
@@sebcam9498 The F-104 has the same leading-edge angle as the Me-262. it also has extremely short wings that remain within the main shockwave cone created by the nose...
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke The DC-3 also has the same leading edge angle as the ME-262. The ME-262s wings were swept for the same reason as the DC-3’s.. to preserve handling characteristics due to a design change (the DC-3 being a larger version of the DC-2, the ME-262 having larger and heavier Junkers engines in place of the BMW ones). That wing sweep angle has almost no effect on supersonic aerodynamics.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
@@calvinnickel9995 That's a completely false urban myth that is derived from a single, highly dubious source which incorrectly attributes the Projekt 1070 as the original design for the Me-262. The Me-262 was developed from Projekt 1065 which clearly had swept wings from inception. It is the first jet to have ALL SWEPT control surfaces and was wind tunnel tested to Mach 1.4 It also has the first fly-by-wire (analog) Horizontal Stabilator developed to counteract the effects of transonic compressiblity and 'Mach Tuck' in a supersonic dive. This false myth also contradicts all the historical evidence and crumbles upon the slightest scrutiny, it is the absolute worst kind of deliberately biased misinformation. The Me-262 was tested and flown with 1, 2 and 3 engines, 3 different types of engines, 9 different engine models from different manufacturers WITH NO CHANGE in wing sweep angle.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 28 дней назад
​​@@calvinnickel9995Just like modern airliners an aircraft can have larger engines fitted without any change in wing sweep angle by simply shifting the position of the engines on the wing. The Me-262 never had straight wings so this Alliboo myth is easily debunked.
@robertkerr4199
@robertkerr4199 Месяц назад
I don't understand why they thought the sound barrier was an impassible wall considering we'd been launching projectiles at the speed of sound for over 40 years by this point...
@mred8002
@mred8002 Месяц назад
Not so much an impenetrable barrier, but unable to design a craft that would not fall apart from the stresses. There was only theoretical understanding of supersonic aerodynamics, and no computer simulations. It was all ‘try it and see’.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Because most early attempts ended in crashes and death, prior to the Messerschmitt Me-262, all aircraft lost pitch control near the speed of sound and crashed. Adolf Busemann designed the world's first Fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator and installed on the Me-262 and wind tunnel tested it to speed up to Mach 1.4. Bell's X-1 used a nearly identical system to reach Mach 1 in level flight.
@mred8002
@mred8002 Месяц назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Good history lesson! I recall reading that we didn’t have a supersonic wind tunnel during their early testing in US and UK. Good engineering with no computer simulations and uncertain knowledge of the needs. Vielen dank!
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
@@mred8002 True! In fact, the very same supersonic wind tunnels at Braunschweig were dismantled and shipped to White Oak Virginia where they were used by Department of Defense and NASA for countless American jet aircraft and missiles along with the Mercury, Gemini and Apollo space programs. The British did not begin construction of their first supersonic wind tunnel at RAE Bedford until 1947!! as a result Britain fell quickly behind in SST technology. Cheers!
@mred8002
@mred8002 Месяц назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Good to know how ignorant of history I am, except for my own profession! Thanks/danke
@JxH
@JxH Месяц назад
Narrator repeatedly says "XS-1" (Excess One). Bell X-1 ?
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
The Bell aircraft program was called the X-1 project, the actual aircraft that broke the sound barriers is called the "XS-1"
@RePeteAndMe
@RePeteAndMe Месяц назад
They should have built it for a short woman.
@WillyBluefield
@WillyBluefield 11 дней назад
A prime example of a purple narration ... to many adverbs and adjectives.
@jacklav1
@jacklav1 Месяц назад
I can’t believe climbing into that thing without an ejection seat.
@wojciechbogdan3361
@wojciechbogdan3361 Месяц назад
According to Richard Tregaskis, who interviewed Yeager, when test flying the X-1 the latter had literal nightmares about having to jump through the side hatch right into that sharp leading edge of the wing.
@stephencurry8552
@stephencurry8552 Месяц назад
And thankfully, the United States of America has been far ahead of little russia ever since.
@thehark6247
@thehark6247 Месяц назад
why thnkfully?
@CharlesTaylor-o9p
@CharlesTaylor-o9p Месяц назад
@@thehark6247 Spotted the Communist...
@stephencurry8552
@stephencurry8552 Месяц назад
@@thehark6247 Little putin's russia is the country equivalent of a criminal. russia is fourth world. Always will be due to who lives there.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
Indeed, the Americans Operation Paperclip and Operation LUSTY transferred the German aerospace industry en masse back to the United States. Thousands of engineers and scientists, thousands of tons of aircraft and test data, and entire factories and research laboratories. It represents the largest transfer of technology from one country to another in history.
@mrhassell
@mrhassell Месяц назад
Jägermeister and planes, don't mix. Jäger bombs being a staple of "watershed moments", best enjoyed in nightclubs, or sheds.
@slowery43
@slowery43 Месяц назад
so dumb... give it up cupcake
@deadon4847
@deadon4847 Месяц назад
5:39 it was Jack Ridley who came up with the adjustable horizontal stabiliser, the "flying tail" not NACA.
@Rotorhead1651
@Rotorhead1651 Месяц назад
Who did Ridley work for?
@michaelshore2300
@michaelshore2300 Месяц назад
It was Miles on the Miles 52 with a All Flying tail Details passed to Bell
@katherineberger6329
@katherineberger6329 Месяц назад
@@michaelshore2300 The X-1's adjustable H-Stab was different than the Miles. It didn't have a whole lot of play and was harder to handle than the conventional elevators, which were handled by the control yoke - Yeager was essentially using the trim adjustment system to control the entire airplane. It was later modified with an all-flying tailplane based on the Miles data, but on Yeager's early transonic flights, the control system was a lot less refined.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Jack Ridley received the plans from Theodore Von Karman who was given the plans directly from Adolf Busemann at the RLM's _Luftfahrtforschungsanstalt_ supersonic wind tunnel lab in Braunschweig. The Bell X-1 used a nearly identical fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator as found on the Messerschmitt Me-262.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
@@Rotorhead1651 Jack Ridley was a student of Theodore Von Karman at JPL.
@rosslyall7369
@rosslyall7369 Месяц назад
That thumb nail is not it
@johne7100
@johne7100 Месяц назад
Good one. Thanks for the nod to the Miles M52, a victim of the British government's eternal "start project - get good results - chicken out" habit. Thus the TSR-2, the Belfast freighter, the Black Knight rocket programme and probably more that I can't remember.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
The M.52 never flew because it was never constructed... in fact no completed plans were ever found. We know that Jack Ridley received the plans for the Bell X-1's Horizontal Stabilator from the Messerschmitt Me-262 by Theodore von Karman during his inspection of the German top secret supersonic wind tunnel laboratories. The UK aircraft industry was doomed to collapse after the country's defeat in WW2
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
You seem completely unfamiliar with the Miles M.52 embezzlement scandal that rocked the new Labour government and Miles being charged by the Crown with 24 counts of fraud and embezzlement? The Board of Trade and the Air Ministry raided Miles Aircraft and found no trace of the two prototypes that had been paid for or any completed plans, no trace of the money was found. A truly shameful and humiliating chapter in British history that has been very thoroughly covered up and wished to be forgotten.
@nmarks
@nmarks Месяц назад
The Americans lent on the British to shut their supersonic research programme down so their own succeeded. US military officers showed up at the Miles research unit one afternoon and raided the place, confiscating all the documents, records, data, drawings and so forth. While that raid was taking place, Miles workers desperately phoned Whitehall for help only to be instructed to hand everything over to the Americans. And that was it. America had taken possession Britain's supersonic research for itself. You don't think it's just a coincidence that the Bell X1 bears a strking resemblance to the Miles M.52 do you? Remember, in the lead up to WWII, certain American billionaires had Nazi leanings*. Wall Street banks even funded the Third Reich. During WWII, it was incredibly convenient for America to keep its distance and watch as the European empires pummeled each other to death. The Americans knew that if the Europeans were mortally weakened, they could establish themselves as the world's preeminent nation in the world. Some might say this explains their late entry into the war, the extortion of the British government into near bankruptcy, the acquisition, at gun point, of advanced European technologies and the recruitment of ex-Nazis after the war. I couldn't possibly comment. *As some do today. I'm looking at you, Donald.
@nmarks
@nmarks Месяц назад
By the way, where do you think the Japanese got the idea for its attack on Pearl Harbour? According to a Channel4 documentary about 18 years ago, they got it from a British man living Japan at the time. Was he was a British Intelligence officer under instruction to manipulate the Japanese into bringing America into the war? It's neither been confirmed nor denied.
@nmarks
@nmarks Месяц назад
BTW, what was a V-22 Osprey doing here in Bali yesterday? There are no US carriers for thousands of miles.
@allentate3760
@allentate3760 Месяц назад
Scott Crossfield was the first to break Mach 2
@frankwoods3915
@frankwoods3915 Месяц назад
Miles
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Miles never designed or built a supersonic aircraft... the fastest jet they ever made only flew 285 miles per hour
@sandervanderkammen9230
@sandervanderkammen9230 27 дней назад
MESSERSCHMITT provided the critical component design and aerodynamic data that allowed the Bell X-1 to break the sound barrier... Miles Aircraft never produced any jet aircraft that could even reach transonic speeds.
@paulandsueroberts4121
@paulandsueroberts4121 Месяц назад
People need to read Miles M.52 by Captain Eric Brown a very distinguished pilot a most informative read.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 29 дней назад
Unfortunately, not a very accurate or credible account regarding the true story of the Miles M.52 embezzlement scandal as Brown was alleged to have benefitted financially from the embezzlement of funds from Miles Aircraft and the M.52 program that led to its cancelation and Crown seizing the company and charging its management with 24 counts of defrauding and embezzling from the Air Ministry. Brown's involvement in this shameful and humiliating scandal was the reason why he never received a knighthood after making the kings' list earlier that year.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 27 дней назад
*Brown was an excellent pilot and probably the best test pilot that ever lived... sadly his career is stained by his financial involvement in the Miles fraud scandal that saw money siphoned from the m.52 program directly to shareholders and key individuals associated with Miles and the M.52 program.* *Frank Whittle was arrested and kicked out of the RAF, stripped of his position at Power Jets Limited before being shipped out to a drug rehab facility in America until the whole fiasco settled down.* *Whittle was the one who exposed the scandal when he demanded more money and attempted to extort cash payments from Miles executives.*
@fdfsdfsvsfgsg4888
@fdfsdfsvsfgsg4888 Месяц назад
Why is this scripted like cheap fiction? This channel used to be good.
@davedavedave52
@davedavedave52 Месяц назад
your dramatic embellishment is real boring
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 Месяц назад
Great story but such a shame the British government cancelled the miles m52- unassisted take off and landing, fully controllable whittle engine and contributed a lot to the X1....
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Never happened. The Miles M.52 does not exist... never did. Dennis Bancroft never produced any credible evidence to support his slanderous false claims about American interference or data being handed over the Bell. Bell Aircraft used captured German technology to develop the XS-1 that flew supersonic. the Bell team used a nearly exact copy of the Messerschmitt Me-262's fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator system. Britain was more than a decade behind the Germans in supersonic aircraft technology and they, not the British gave the Americans the power-assisted, fly-by-wire stabilator..
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 28 дней назад
The Miles M.52 contributed nothing to the Bell X-1, the M.52 was never built and no trace of was ever found. Miles went tits-up after its coffers and the M.52 program was loited..
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 27 дней назад
@@WilhelmKarsten not so, the American team from bell visited the UK and were granted full access to the miles m52 project. The biggest contribution to the bell X1 was the all moving tail plane which solved their control problems.....
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 27 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 Never happened, the Miles M.52 never existed and no data was ever stolen or given to Bell or the Americans because it did not exist. Theodore von Kármán met with Aldolf Busemann while inspecting the DLA Supersonic wind tunnel laboratories in Brauschweig. He gave the plans and the data from the Messerschmitt Me-262's fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator system to his friend and former student at JPL Jack Ridley, Ridley was head of aerodynamic engineering on the Bell X-1 program. The Bell XS-1 used a copy of the German Me-262 Horizontal Stabilator to break the speed of sound. Any questions??
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 27 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 *Never in the entire history aviation has there been so much discussion regarding an aircraft that never existed.* *The Miles M.52 never existed* *Britain did not begin construction of its first supersonic aircraft wind tunnel laboratory at RAE Bedford until late 1947, the British lacked the technology to build supersonic aircraft until the 1950s.* *The M.52 was a proposal for an aircraft that Britain could not design or build at the time.* *Revisionist historians has fabricated a false narratives regarding the M.52 in an desparate attempt to insert Britain into the early development history of supersonic aircraft that it was not a part of.* *The Miles M.52 embezzlement scandal is a truly shameful and humiliating chapter in British aviation history that destroyed many careers including Dennis Bancroft, Frank Whittle and Eric Brown.* *The Horizontal Stabilator is not a British invention and factual evidence confirms this.* *The Messerschmitt Me-262 was the first jet aircraft to have a fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator system.*
@georgeburns7251
@georgeburns7251 Месяц назад
Oh no, the worst aviation channel on RU-vid. Can’t watch
@Mark-pp7jy
@Mark-pp7jy Месяц назад
The narration is terrible. This guy needs to enunciate.
@D.T.A1
@D.T.A1 Месяц назад
So you have a CHANNEL.. ENUNCIATE OVER THERE . C L O W N ...
@kylethomas5164
@kylethomas5164 Месяц назад
SECOND!
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy Месяц назад
For what? Why are you here?
@Spectacularhuman
@Spectacularhuman Месяц назад
​@@JSFGuy...why you come in here asking all kind of questions and ish ? Be cool dude. It's a great day to be alive. 💪✌️
@kylethomas5164
@kylethomas5164 Месяц назад
@@JSFGuy first is the worse. second is the best player. get played
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy Месяц назад
@@Spectacularhuman why do I ask questions? Because I can and I should. Why do you want to deflect?
@JSFGuy
@JSFGuy Месяц назад
@@kylethomas5164 all right, in what world?
@peterstubbs5934
@peterstubbs5934 8 дней назад
Aided by input from the British Miles 52 aircraft.. Moving tailplane for example. I`m afraid our American cousins ripped us off on this one. The Brits and Americans agreed to share supersonic data seeing as the Russians were becoming the main threat and they didnt want wasted effort due to us both (Brits and Yanks) duplicating therefore wasting research effort.. The Americans came to Britain and went home to the US with all our data. When the Brits turned up in America asking for their supersonic data, they were told it was all secret and left with nothing. Eric "Winkle" Brown, the best test pilot that ever flew, says there could only be two possibilities, 1, they intentionally ripped us off or 2, they were behind the Brits in the field and were embarrassed to admit it...
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 6 дней назад
The Miles M.52 is hoax, never in history has there been so much discussion about an aircraft that never existed. When the Ministry and Board of Trade raided Miles Aircraft no trace of the two prototypes or any completed drawings were ever found. The Bell X-1 used technology from the Messerschmitt Me-262 which was the world's first jet aircraft to have a fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator system The Bell X-1 used a nearly exact copy of the Me-262's analog fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator to counteract the effects of compressiblity and Mach tuck at high transonic speeds. Britain would not have the technology to build a supersonic aircraft until 1954.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke День назад
That is a completely false narrative that has been discredited. Britain did not invent the Horizontal Stabilator, and the Miles M.52 was never a real aircraft, it was nothing more than a proposal for a supersonic aircraft, but no work was ever completed, Britain would not have a supersonic plane until the mid-1950s. Dennis Bancroft concocted the crazy tale of data being giving to Bell to save face, but no evidence has ever been found to prove his claims. No completed plans of the M.52 ever existed,
@potrzebieneuman4702
@potrzebieneuman4702 Месяц назад
Chuck Yeager's first book covers this really well and explains the reason he was so good. It was because before he did any test flight he would stay up late into the night learning everything he could about the aircraft until he knew every system right down to the nuts and bolts that held it together. If I remember correctly he said it had saved his life on more than one occasion. He was truly an exceptional character.
@ssnerd583
@ssnerd583 Месяц назад
Chuck was an aircraft mechanic before he became a pilot....he had an innate mechanical knowledge and he KNEW what he could trust and what he could not.
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
He was also bad. A seat of the pants pilot in an era of high performance that required computer precision and rigid adherence to procedures and profiles. He got in trouble early in the X-1 program because he pushed the aircraft too far on one flight rather than approaching Mach 1 in increments. He was chastised and didn’t do it again. But after he went Mach 1 his ego got really big and since he didn’t have an engineering degree he was out of his league among astronaut candidates and the new generation of test pilots-who only tolerated him because of his record breaking flight and war record. In the NF-104 program he was the base loser for altitude records because he refused to fly the profile. It’s more mathematical than feel.. because the plane first has to accelerate to its maximum level flight speed which is at the tropopause (nominally 36,000 feet). Any lower.. and the air is too thick. Any higher and the thinning air is no longer offset by dropping temperature leading to massive performance degradation. Then you have to pitch up to a certain attitude. Too low.. and you’ll never make your maximum altitude. Too high.. the plane will lose too much speed in the steep climb. Then you have to pitch at the right rate. Too slow.. and again by the time you reach the correct attitude you’ve lost a lot of energy in the lower thick atmosphere. Too fast.. and the drag from pulling excessive G will rob you of your speed. This was very simple where the plane had a checklist and procedure to follow.. and a flight director on the attitude indicator to indicate the correct attitudes and pitch rates. But Chuck knew better and was going to fly his own profile. And when he didn’t reach the desired altitude, he tried to “force it” higher rather than letting it fall in a controlled manner.. which resulted in an unrecoverable spin and crash.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 23 дня назад
@@calvinnickel9995 *Well at least Chuck Yeager was honest and was never caught stealing money from his own country's supersonic aircraft program like Eric Brown was, Brown was denied his Knighthood because he was involved in the M.52 embezzlement scandal.*
@justincase5272
@justincase5272 21 день назад
He didn't stay up late learning the systems. He spent months, if not years learning the systems. He stayed up late the night before topping off his expertise, rote memory and muscle memory by going through the checklists and emergency procedures over and over.
@brianpesci
@brianpesci Месяц назад
The history of the contributions made here in Western New York for aviation's advancements by Bell, Curtiss Wright and the dedicated workers that were my parents generation, has mostly been forgotten by today's world. I only wish that they would correct the fact that the X-1 planes were built in Wheatfield , NY, not actually in Buffalo, as the Curtiss Wright aircraft factory was the only one in the city itself.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 27 дней назад
*In hindsight we know that the Miles M.52 (had it ever existed) could never reach Mach 1 in level flight.* *No aircraft powered by an obsolete and inefficient centrifugal jet engine has ever flown Mach 1.*
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 26 дней назад
@@WilhelmKarsten 1/3 scale model did Mach 1.38 in 1948.......
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 26 дней назад
@@WilhelmKarsten I think a Russian thing went supersonic.....just with a centrifugal compressor......at the limit of what was possible with those designs
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 26 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 *What's you point?* *The Reynolds effect is scalar... so a scale model proves nothing.* *We know today that the M.52 as proposed (and had it been built) could never reached Mach 1.* *Air Ministry officials knew this which is why the program was never restarted.* *No aircraft powered by an obsolete centrifugal jet engine has ever flown supersonic in level flight.* *The Soviets attempted to build a centrifugal jet powered plane to fly Mach 1 but it also failed to reach the speed of sound, it was abandoned in favor of new Axial Compressor technology.*
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 26 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 We know that Frank Whittles W.2/500-M.52 engine never successfully completed a PTFR test and never produced the specified thrust to take the M.52 up to the speed of sound... Centrifugal turbojets , due to inherent limitations and inefficiency cannot produce the Thrust-to-Drag Ratio performance required for straight and level supersonic flight. Britian did not have the technology to fly supersonic until 1952.,
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 25 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 *The Soviet OKB l-1 was a failure and never reached Mach 1...*
@Jason-fm4my
@Jason-fm4my Месяц назад
John Browning, you've done it again😅
@paulis7319
@paulis7319 Месяц назад
John M Browning was certainly the Einstein of ballistics and firearms. Hard to believe that everything he designed is still in use today.
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@paulis7319 Mature technology. Just like how a pencil hasn’t really changed in a century.
@paulis7319
@paulis7319 Месяц назад
@@calvinnickel9995 Good point!
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 26 дней назад
The first supersonic projectiles date back to the Chinese Song Dynasty (960-1279AD), weapons known as Zhen Tian Lei (震天雷, "Sky-shaking Thunder" The fastest the Bell X-1 ever flew was Mach 1,4... nowhere near the speed of the .50 Cal. BMG projectile!
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 26 дней назад
@@calvinnickel9995 The British didn't invent the Pencil or Supersonic Aircraft.
@mickmccrory8534
@mickmccrory8534 Месяц назад
"There's a demon out there. He lives around .98 mach."
@dennisyoung4631
@dennisyoung4631 Месяц назад
“…he sits atop the sound-wall…”
@harken9978
@harken9978 Месяц назад
feels written by ai idk if i'm wiggin. Something ahout the syntax feels off
@Tubesmaney
@Tubesmaney Месяц назад
Did he say 6,000 lbs of thrust? The latest GE engines that will be used on the 777 each will have 134,000 lbs of thrust! The progress is staggering!
@MattH-wg7ou
@MattH-wg7ou Месяц назад
Crazy they did this with straight unswept wings!
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
Yes, a very inefficient design but the wings were short and thin enough to remain stable in the main shockwave cone at supersonic.
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@WilhelmKarsten You misunderstand supersonic aerodynamics. The only thing the air cares about is how thick the wing is along the longitudinal axis. So if its a thin straight wing like the X-1 or F-104.. or a thick swept wing like the F-100 or F-101 (which presents itself like a thin wing on the longitudinal axis) it doesn’t matter. The only way swept wings make a difference is it allows them to be made simpler with two thick wing spars instead of multiple spars.. and that they won’t easily protrude into the bow wave (the X-1 didn’t go fast enough for it to matter, the F-104s wings were short enough and far enough back that they remained within the bow wave).
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
@@calvinnickel9995 *None of that matters he you do not have adequate stability and pitch control... this was not possible until Adolf Busemann invented the Fly-by-wire HORIZONTAL STABILATOR.* *It was first used for the Messerschmitt Me-262.* *Any questions lad?.*
@robertharrison2260
@robertharrison2260 Месяц назад
@@WilhelmKarsten Fly by wire in the 1944-45 ??? please feel free to explain but before you do I would kindly ask you to refer to the ME 262 pilots and engineering/ airframe notes as the rear tail of the aircraft was relatively conventional in nature with elevators actuated by push-pull rods with an electric trim pitch control Stabilizer operated via a jackscrew inside an aluminium fairing that was powered by a small electric motor. The ME 262s "trim pitch control system" was actually a stabilizer and not a stabilator this is important to clarify as it was part of the trim system acting on the leading edge of the horizontal tailplane this was necessary on the 262 to keep the aircraft within its max permissible Centre of Gravity (CG) of 30% mean aerodynamic cord (MAC). In flight due to the changes in weight and balance caused by fuel consumption in fore and aft fuel tanks the 4 heavy 30mm cannons (as ammunition was expended in the nose), the revolutionary wing design was in part due to the 2 heavy turbojet engines and the speed changes that all necessitated trim control at different times throughout its flight envelope. If you ever manage to go to a Royal Aeronautical Society seminar you will discover that the first Stabilator or all moving tail (operated by the control column) was initially developed by Miles Aircraft in England and was first flight tested on a Spitfire in October 1944. There are some people who claim that the British shared some technical information with the USA and Bell aircraft incorporated this system in their own design for the X1 - we do know that a group of US Engineers from Bell did visit Miles to see the Miles M52 and they were shown details of the prototype and there are witnesses who corroborate this who were there at the time. That said some others state that Bell developed their own independent system "in house" for the X1 so we will probably never know the full story but the fact is that the X1 was the first piloted aircraft to officially be recognised as breaking the sound barrier and everything else is irrelevant. One final thing a lot of people do not recognise to this day is that a pilotless scale prototype rocket powered Miles M52 (dropped from a modified DH Mosquito) achieved mach 1.38 in level flight in October 1948 this proved the Miles design concept would have worked if it had not been cancelled. What a lot of people also do not know is that much of the test and aerodynamic data from Miles was developed over the years and incorporated into various other platforms and systems currently seeing a lot of use today.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 24 дня назад
​@@WilhelmKarstenyes I refer you to my photo of the me262 - clearly no stabilator.......
@MrSmithUK
@MrSmithUK День назад
As an Englishman, I’m proud of the UKs contribution to making this flight not only possible, but survivable too.
@andrewsmart2949
@andrewsmart2949 2 дня назад
yeah shaped like a bullet,then put wings on with a strait front edge LOL
@joewharton-vy7oq
@joewharton-vy7oq Месяц назад
best military fACT youtuber, sub this guy and ignore the "clones" best narration voice going, if it has a fake A.I .voice is not this guy
@Spectacularhuman
@Spectacularhuman Месяц назад
The AI drone voice overs can throw off the balances of the Human P.H. levels. So we come here to return to an alkaline state. Lol😊
@FoulOwl2112
@FoulOwl2112 Месяц назад
It's AI generated and AI narrated bozo
@Spectacularhuman
@Spectacularhuman Месяц назад
@@FoulOwl2112 who you calling a Bozo? ... Are you talking to me ? Are you talking to me ? Cuz I'm the only one standing here ? 😂
@CharlesTaylor-o9p
@CharlesTaylor-o9p Месяц назад
@@Spectacularhuman Calm down Mr. Bickle...😏
@wayneabbott652
@wayneabbott652 Месяц назад
@@FoulOwl2112no just a bozo
@blackbandit1290
@blackbandit1290 Месяц назад
It might be an idea to design an aircraft that can fly supersonic using as a model a 50cal bullet for it's stability but that's where the comparison ends. Whether it be 30cal, 50cal, 20mm, 50mm they have a couple of notable differences; the most accurate projectiles are what's called 'boat tail' designs with specific dimensions. Bullets are also primarily stabilized by being spun at significant rotations (by the barrel rifling).
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
The key to breaking the sound barrier was the power assisted, servo-operated Horizontal Stabilator. The Germans had it first on the Me-262 and the Bell X-1 copied it.
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke The ME262 DID NOT have an all-moving stabilizer.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
@@calvinnickel9995 The Messerschmitt Me-262 is the world's first jet aircraft with an electric, fly-by-wire horizonal stabilator system. It was developed by a genius engineer named Adolf Busemann. All Me-262s made during and after the war featured a horizontal stabilator system..
@robertharrison2260
@robertharrison2260 Месяц назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke I think you need to look at my post to Wilhelm Karsten above (you sound like the same guy !!) but you are factually incorrect in that you do not know the difference between a stabilizer and stabilator - the 262 had an electrically actuated stabilizer for trim control operated by a jackscrew powered by a small electric motor within the tail empennage this was not connected to the control column which operated conventional elevators using a push-pull rod system.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 27 дней назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke didn't come from the 262...the all moving stabiliser was in all likelihood copied from the American visit to the miles factory where they were granted access to the m52 project, which had the then called, all moving tail plane
@Istandby666
@Istandby666 Месяц назад
I loved growing up around Edwards Air force Base
@slowery43
@slowery43 Месяц назад
and that is supposed to be informative or entertaining how? You think anyone came here hoping to here alla bout you? Wow
@fredliperson9171
@fredliperson9171 Месяц назад
Can you imagine these fellas wearing earrings? 😂
@jamesjaudon8247
@jamesjaudon8247 4 дня назад
He proved if you put a big enough motor on a trashcan, it will fly.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke День назад
You can't fly supersonic no matter how big your engine is if you don't have a power-assisted horizontal stabilator. without the fly-by-wire electric Horizontal stabilator from the Messerschmitt Me-262 the Bell-1 would have lost control and augered straight into the ground just like the de-Havilland DH-108 did 3 times in a row..
@dexterious006
@dexterious006 Месяц назад
1:09 because why?
@daveb.4268
@daveb.4268 Месяц назад
It must be important, becuse they show it again at 12:35.😂
@TaxPayingContributor
@TaxPayingContributor Месяц назад
I believe he is, in addition to goofing off, gathering b roll footage of sky spinning. Film could be used to dramatize possible catastrophe.
@Maltekinese
@Maltekinese Месяц назад
I'm not sure but with the speed of 1003,67 km/h, the "Me 163" the flying "poweregg" was the first one 3 years earlier? Or was it a little under the sonic speed of M 1?
@paulcantrell01451
@paulcantrell01451 Месяц назад
It was probably a little under... At -25°C, Mach 1 is about 704 mph, so the Heini Dittmar "unofficial" speed is right up there... but I've read multiple accounts of Me163 pilots encountering compressability. "The usable Mach number was similar to that of the Me 262, but because of the high thrust-to-drag ratio, it was much easier for the pilot to lose track of the onset of severe compressibility and risk loss of control. A Mach warning system was installed as a result." So I think it's unlikely that Heini exceeded Mach 1... Cool little plane ( with horrific statistics for the well being of the pilots flying it )
@Maltekinese
@Maltekinese Месяц назад
@@paulcantrell01451 Thank you very much! 🍀😊👍🇩🇪 1234,8 km/h is the speed of sound. 343 m/s. Yess you're right. They slowed down the Me 262 because of compressabilty, stability, use of higher fuselage. More stability = higher weight. High speed curve = more gravitation = more wasted fuel. The german system was more powerful than the more easy, cheaper and the more simple of Frank Whittle from the UK - but higher consumption of material, lower flighttime hours, 12 - 22 hours until next maintenance. They haven't had the modern alloys and not the modern ways to increase the flighttime hours with less affords of maintenance. The Me 163 was really very dangerous - for the pilots and just max 15-20 minutes flighttime.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 19 дней назад
@@paulcantrell01451 Certainly not in straight and level flight but we know that like the F-86 the Me-262 could easily reach and exceed Mach 1 in a full power dive if the altitude and atmospheric conditions were right, the Me-262 had a high enough critical Mach number to exceed Mach 1 in controlled flight and it is the world's first jet with a fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator which was used to counteract the effects of "Mach tuck". Chuck Yeager confirmed Hans Mutke's written accounts of passing through his own shock wave in 1945, his descriptions exactly match, although Mutke said he was not the first German pilot to fly the Me-262 supersonic in a dive and that other 262 pilots had achieved it before him..
@NinjaForHire
@NinjaForHire Месяц назад
What an amazing point in time the anticipation and accomplishment the men then have had to experience giving birth to a type of flight starting the whole X series up to date. What a triumph that we still share it with them in our day of aviation.
@glorybound7599
@glorybound7599 Месяц назад
We went from 200 knot biplanes in the late 1930’s to super sonic rocket planes by 1947.
@daystatesniper01
@daystatesniper01 Месяц назад
Another no B/S production keep it up Dark !!
@daveb.4268
@daveb.4268 Месяц назад
Dangerous times. They said that, "if you ever see the American flag at "full staff", take a picture. It won't be for long." 😔
@realmstupid-on8df
@realmstupid-on8df Месяц назад
Why was it painted pink
@Nightwing01010
@Nightwing01010 Месяц назад
24? Dude looks 40
@lockehaney3013
@lockehaney3013 Месяц назад
Was the host plane the B-29 or the B50? The B50 was similar in looks to the B29. I only ask as a documentary of the B-50 stated that it (B-50) was the plane the carried the X1
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
The Boeing B-50 did not enter service until 1948.. the first X-1 test used the B-29 towards the end of program the B-50 was used.
@RARDingo
@RARDingo Месяц назад
The "all flying stabilizer" tech was supplied by the British.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
That's a completely false narrative and no credible evidence exists to support this popular but completely false myth. The Miles M.52 never existed and no relevant data or completed drawings were ever found when the Miles company was seized by the Crown and placed into administrative receivership. The Bell XS-1 used a copy of the Me-262's fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator system to counteract the effects of compressiblity and Mach tuck at Mach 1.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Never happened... this false rumor comes from Dennis Bancroft who produced no evidence of any kind to support it. We know from the people associated with the Bell X-1 program that the critical data and technology was captured in Germany after the war by the Von Karman Mission and that Bell had close ties with Adolf Busemann and Messerschmitt after the war. The Messerschmitt Me-262 is the World's first jet to have a power assisted Horizontal Stabilator... the Bell X-1 used a copy of the Me-262 system.
@sandervanderkammen9230
@sandervanderkammen9230 27 дней назад
The British did not invent the all flying tail, there is absolutely no evidence that even suggests that britain contributed anything to the development of supersonic aircraft.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 23 дня назад
@@RARDingo *The Miles M.52 is a hoax, no such aircraft ever existed*
@philipgrice1026
@philipgrice1026 Месяц назад
Key to the success of the X-1 was the information provided by the Miles M52 design team. The 'fully flying' elevators eliminated the hinged elevators flutter, a high speed oscillation, that had caused several conventional aircraft to crash as they approached the 'sound barrier'. Geoffrey DeHaviland's DH108 attempted to address this problem by eliminating the tail altogether but probably crashed from flutter that damaged the 'elevons', combined elevators and ailerons, on the main wing. Mentioned, but not explained, is the return of the X-1 to bell for modifications. This was when the fully flying elevator was incorporated into the design, eliminating the hinges and moving the entire rear wing to serve as a structurally inflexible elevator. All modern high speed aircraft use fully flying elevators as a result.
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
All modern high speed aircraft use normal elevators. They use an all moving stabilizer as well.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
*The Miles M.52 never existed and the Bell X1 used a Fly-by-wire Horizontal Stabilator system copied from the Messerschmitt Me-262.* *Bell Aircraft had a very significant relationship with Theodore von Kármán, Adolf Busemann and Messerschmitt after the war.*
@alexc4300
@alexc4300 Месяц назад
From the accident report, DH108 suffered from control reversal as it approached Mach 1, resulting in what was often a violent manoeuver. Geoffrey DeHaviland was a tall man, 6 foot, and when his body was recovered it was found he’d broken his neck, believed to have been sustained when his head struck the canopy. Another pilot who was slightly shorter managed to avoid the same fate and made a report back on the ground. Side note: all three DH108s were lost in fatal crashes. Those early days of high speed flight really were forays into the unknown, and when you stepped outside parameters you didn’t even know existed, there was zero time to respond. The film, The Sound Barrier, a 1952 British classic, gives a real feel of the risks of exploring the unknown. Tony’s crash sequence is visceral. A great irony that two months after its release in July 1952, test pilot John Derry died when his DH110 broke up during a display at Farnborough, England. Turned out the aircraft that had been used all week had experimental overwing strakes to manage airflow over the wing. The fatal flight used an aircraft without the strakes - seems they’d accidentally given the wings just enough extra rigidity to withstand the high energy rolling pullouts being demonstrated. The crash being at Farnborough was quite convenient for the Air Accident Investigation Branch, based at the airfield. Indeed I seem to recall reading in his biography that the investigator assigned to the case had seen the breakup from his back garden.
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Never in history has there been so much discussion regarding an aircraft that in fact, never even existed. The M.52 is a false narrative that has been used by revisionists in an attempt to insert Britain into the history of supersonic aircraft that it was not a part of during the 1940's. The Miles M.52 embezzlement scandal revealed that no actual work was ever done on the M.52, when the Board of Trade and the Air Ministry officials raided Miles Aircraft company, no trace of the two prototypes or any completed drawings were ever found... nor was the money paid to Miles for them. The power assisted servo-controlled Horizontal Stabilator is not a British invention, it was created by Adolf Busemann at the World's only supersonic aircraft wind tunnel facility during WW2, the German RLM's LFA or _Luftfahrtforschungsanstalt_ This advanced aerodynamic technology was first produced for the Messerschmitt 262 jet fighter... and was used by Jack Ridley on the Bell XS-1. Britain lagged many years behind in supersonic aerodynamic research in the 1940s and 50's. Construction of the first supersonic wind tunnel at RAE Bedford would not begin until late 1947.
@paulandsueroberts4121
@paulandsueroberts4121 Месяц назад
@@WilhelmKarstenYou need to read the book Miles M.52 written by Captain Eric Brown one of the greatest pilots ever.
@mingfanzhang8927
@mingfanzhang8927 Месяц назад
😮😮😮😮
@mingfanzhang4600
@mingfanzhang4600 Месяц назад
😊
@robertalan4717
@robertalan4717 28 дней назад
Yeagers autobiography is on of the best books I have read, along with Bill Bridgemans 'The Lonely Sky' in which Yeager flew chase in the P80, for the Douglas Skyrocket.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 26 дней назад
@@robertalan4717 had a bee in his bonnet about Armstrong though.......claimed civilian pilots should not be astronauts.... conveniently forgetting his previous service..
@sandervanderkammen9230
@sandervanderkammen9230 25 дней назад
​@@laurencedawson7754*Ever hear the joke about the two British astronauts that walk into a pub?*
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 25 дней назад
@@sandervanderkammen9230 we have ever had two I think!! And from what I hear you wouldn't go for a beer with either of them!!!
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 25 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 Britain never had a manned space program! in 2024 the British can't put a satellite into orbit or even build their own a jet aircraft.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 25 дней назад
@@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke you guys can't either!!
@familyhelpdeskhelpdesk270
@familyhelpdeskhelpdesk270 Месяц назад
Amazing performance of a british design given away by the british government
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Never happened... pure British science fiction. The Miles M.52 does not exist, it is a fabrication of British propaganda and fake revisionist "historians"
@jerryg53125
@jerryg53125 Месяц назад
There was no Miles M-52.The picture show in the video is a Ply-wood mock-up. The real plane was never built.
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 24 дня назад
​@@jerryg53125that's true! Another cancellation of a great possible project but they had some good research and had solved some of the critical problems on control which were given to the bell team
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 24 дня назад
@@laurencedawson7754 Unfortunately there is no evidence to support the false myth that Miles Aircraft designed a supersonic aircraft or that any data from this mythical, fictional aircraft was ever given to Bell aircraft or the Americans. No proof has even been found to support this ridiculous claim... it is in fact pure British science fiction. The Miles M.52 is an attempt by modern British revisionist historians to create a false narrative that includes Britain in the early development history of supersonic aviation that it did not contribute or participate in, the UK would not have the technology to build a supersonic aircraft until the 1950's after many other countries achieved the same feat before the British.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 23 дня назад
@@familyhelpdeskhelpdesk270 *The Brits fictional version of "history" is an amazing performance, the Miles M.52 never existed and no data was ever given away because there was none.* *You know the old saying? The brits never let the truth get in the way of a good story!*
@jameswalker3973
@jameswalker3973 Месяц назад
He had a broken rib during this flight after falling from a horse the day before. Had to use a sawed off broom handle to close hatch.
@donaldharlan3981
@donaldharlan3981 Месяц назад
The video you are showing definitely does not match what occurred. The dates of incident are all wrong. The names of companies and people are total lies. None of that is true concerning those companies or those people.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
*It's is well-known and historically documented that Bell Aircraft company using captured German technology built and tested the first manned aircraft to reach Mach 1 in level flight.* *There are no credible alternative narratives to this historical event or envents.*
@donaldharlan3981
@donaldharlan3981 Месяц назад
@@WilhelmKarsten That is a total lie. There was no such thing as Bell aircraft back then. If there was it was a different Bell aircraft.
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@donaldharlan3981 I guess we were all just imagining the Bell P-39 Airacobra that fought in WWII.. or the Bell XP-59 which was the USA’s first jet aircraft… lol. The Bell aircraft then is the same one that is owned by Textron now and makes helicopters.
@calvinnickel9995
@calvinnickel9995 Месяц назад
@WilhelmKarsten There wasn’t any captured German technology used in the X-1. The US had a healthy aircraft industry and sufficient liquid rocket technology on its own to build the X-1. The X-1 used the shape of a .50 BMG bullet for the fuselage-right down to the canopy which didn’t protrude into the slipstream, straight wings that were made exceptionally thin rather than the swept wings the Germans developed (which allow for a thicker wing that’s easier to make, structurally), and an all-moving tail which was crucial to control under supersonic speed and didn’t feature in any German aircraft.
@donaldharlan3981
@donaldharlan3981 Месяц назад
@@calvinnickel9995 totally different company. I own the patents and intellectual properties, just like the company Bell. Bell mostly sells parts, helicopters and safety equipment. There is a lot of Photoshop, history and alternate history full of posers from wars of all eras.
@CowHorace
@CowHorace Месяц назад
Designed and mostly built by the British.
@deadon4847
@deadon4847 Месяц назад
Parallel research. Both were built in secret.
@CharlesTaylor-o9p
@CharlesTaylor-o9p Месяц назад
Both the unbuilt Miles M.52 design and the Bell X-1 also relied heavily on WWII German research. The rocket-powered Me163 Komet set an unofficial speed record of 642 MPH in March 1944...
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Unfortunately, this popular British myth quickly falls apart under the slightest scrutiny... the Miles M.52 does not exist and no completed plans were ever found. The money paid to Miles for the m.52 program was stolen by Dennis Bancroft, Frank Whittle and several other Miles shareholders. Mile Aircraft was charged with 24 counts of fraud and embezzlement and the company was seized and later liquidated.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
Completely false! Britain was a decade behind the Germans in supersonic aerodynamic research and it was data from the Messerschmitt Me-262 that was recovered after the war that directly led to the Bell X-1's Horizontal Stabilator system. This is well documented from the Von Kármán Mission. Jack Ridley and Theodore von Kármán often shared research and were close friends since Ridley was a student at JPL.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
​​@@deadon4847A completely false revisionist narrative that comes from a less than credible origin, the British would not even begin construction of its first supersonic wind tunnel at RAE Bedford until 1947.
@rogercrier9115
@rogercrier9115 Месяц назад
Correct me if I am wrong, but the British government gave all of the data Miles had to Bell, and expected to receive nuclear secrets in return, but that didn’t happen.
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten Месяц назад
*True, it never happened. The Miles M.52 never existed and no data was exchanged with the Americans or Bell Aircraft.* *The Miles M.52 scandal is one of the most shameful and humiliating chapters in British aviation history and many of those who embezzled or received funds earmarked for the M.52 program have gone to great lengths to fabricate a false, alternative narrative.* *Miles Aircraft was raided by the Board of Trade and the Air Ministry, auditors found no trace of the two M.52 prototypes, completed drawings or the money paid for them.* *Only a collection of artists renderings and a partially built full scale mockup made from balsa wood is known to exist.* *The Crown charged Miles with 24 counts of fraud and embezzlement and it was believed that chief engineer Dennis Bancroft was one of the key players in the embezzlement scam to defraud the British government and the British people.* *Also evolved was Eric Brown who was denied his Knighthood because of his involvement with the scandal and Frank Whittle who was arrested and discharged from the RAF amid allegations of bribery, fraud, embezzlement and dereliction of duty.* *Whittle was forced out of his own company and exiled to America where he never worked as an aerospace engineer for the rest of his life as a direct result of his involvement with the M.52 scandal.* *Cheers!*
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke Месяц назад
Miles Aircraft made never made any contribution to the development of supersonic aircraft, the fastest jet ever built and flown by Miles could only reach 285 miles per hour. The M.52 myth is a rather feeble, pathetic attempt by British revisionists to insert themselves into the early development history of supersonic flight of the 1940's... Britain lagged years behind in supersonic aircraft technology, a very shameful and humiliating facts that the British have tried very hard to cover-up and deny
@laurencedawson7754
@laurencedawson7754 26 дней назад
@@rogercrier9115 quite correct
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke
@DoktorBayerischeMotorenWerke 25 дней назад
@@laurencedawson7754 There is no evidence to support the claims of Dennis Bancroft, this false myth comes directly from Bancroft but he never offered any factual, credible evidence to support it. All of the factual evidence confirms that there was never any Miles M.52 and that no data was ever given to or stolen by the Americans or Bell Aircraft. Miles Aircraft never had any useful data, it never produced any supersonic aircraft, it only made false claims..
@WilhelmKarsten
@WilhelmKarsten 23 дня назад
@@laurencedawson7754 *The Miles M.52 is a hoax, no such aircraft exists.* *The British did not have the data to build a supersonic aircraft until 1952*
Далее
The Plane That Makes the B-29 Look Like a Toy
19:27
Просмотров 79 тыс.
The Plane that Was Too Creepy For Hitler
16:53
Просмотров 219 тыс.
Avaz Oxun - Yangisidan bor
14:29
Просмотров 430 тыс.
Дикий Бармалей разозлил всех!
01:00
Se las dejo ahí.
00:10
Просмотров 661 тыс.
How Two German Pilots did the Unthinkable
20:03
Просмотров 874 тыс.
The Soviet Obsession With Venus Revealed
16:15
Просмотров 2,2 млн
The Rare B-29 Exterminator That Shocked the US
14:56
Просмотров 276 тыс.
The Plane That Accidentally Flew Into Space
12:57
Просмотров 301 тыс.
This experiment confirmed quantum physics
25:56
Просмотров 45 тыс.
The Completely Bizarre Physics Near Absolute Zero
17:10
How the Lockheed SR-71 Blackbird Works
55:30
Просмотров 4,4 млн
Avaz Oxun - Yangisidan bor
14:29
Просмотров 430 тыс.