Тёмный

The Forgotten Failure Of The New Universe 

Strange Brain Parts
Подписаться 43 тыс.
Просмотров 63 тыс.
50% 1

A look at the origin and history of The New Universe, a line of comics published by Marvel Comics to coincide with and to celebrate the company’s twenty-fifth anniversary in 1986.
Please subscribe to be notified of future updates!
SUPPORT OVERLORD COMICS:
Join this channel to get early, ad free access to videos and other perks.
bit.ly/Support...
OVERLORD COMICS ON TWITTER:
bit.ly/Overlor...
CONTACT:
overlordcomics@gmail.com
CREDITS:
Written, edited and narrated by Allan Casavettes.
SOURCES:
“Jim Shooter Interview,” by Michael Thomas. Comic Book Resources. October 06, 2000.
www.cbr.com/ji...
“Mark Gruenwald,” by Dwight Jon Zimmerman. Comics Interview #54. 1988.
New Universe Previews. Marvel Age #47, #48 and #50. 1987.
“Sparks In A Bottle, The Saga Of The New Universe,” by Dan Johnson. Back Issue #34. June 2009.
“Archie Goodwin,” by Dwight Jon Zimmerman. Comics Interview #36. 1986.
“Jim Shooter Fired, Marvel Cites No Reason,” by R. Fiore. The Comics Journal #116. July 1987.
“The Jim Shooter Interview,” by Joe Petrilak. July 22, 1998.
www.valiantarch...
#BronzeAge #JimShooter #NewUniverse #MarvelComics #JohnByrne #comics #comicbooks

Опубликовано:

 

1 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 481   
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs Год назад
There was an element that you left out of your assessment of The New Universe's failure: the distributors H-A-T-E-D it! I attended a meeting of Marvel distributors just before the line was released. The editors of each title gave a presentation about their stories and characters. One of the prominent distributors, Chuck Rozanski, basically said "If the Marvel name wasn't posted on the cover of these books, they wouldn't stand a chance of selling!" Jim Shooter, to his credit, basically responded," These books WILL sell if I have to stand on a street corner and sell them myself!" Basically, Shooter probably wasn't impressed with the clout of the Direct Sales Market at that time, so he sold the titles to newsstands as well, proving his determination to succeed. Unfortunately, it could be argued that Shooter "shot himself in the foot" by doing that and prompted the distributors to under-order the titles and contributed to their failures. I don't know if his successors felt differently after he "left," but I don't recall seeing comics on newsstands as prominently as when Shooter was still at Marvel...
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
Thank you for adding that! I didn't see any mention of the direct market distributors disliking the concept when I was doing research. Now that you mention it, I could definitely see them wielding their power and expressing disinterest at the new line-up. It goes along very well with Shooter's aggressive campaign of flooding the market with Marvel titles and the disdain that seemed to engender from the smaller publishers. As for titles disappearing from newsstands: If memory serves, it was the late 80's where the direct market became *the* distribution model for practically everyone. By roughly 1989/90, I don't recall seeing comics anywhere but in specialty stores. Naturally, that would vary from area to area. My point being, I think it was a natural progression to adopt the direct market (which was a guaranteed sale) as opposed to possibly overprinting and taking a guess at what sales would be three months down the line from newsstands. In other words, I think it was just timing.
@noneofyourbusiness4616
@noneofyourbusiness4616 Год назад
@@StrangeBrainParts I remember them still being in convenience stores in the very early '90s. Mainly remember this because,\ that's where I rediscovered the Now Comics "Ralph Snart Adventures" after having bought some of the early issues at a direct market shop in the '80s. I was surprised to find this underground-ish title at 7/11 or whichever convenience store it was.
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
I don't doubt your memory at all. From what I recall, newsstand distribution wasn't completely phased out until, roughly, 1994 or 1995.
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs Год назад
@@StrangeBrainParts You're welcome. I was working for a distributor at the time who didn't want to attend the meeting so he let me go in his place. In Peter David's "But I Digress" columns, he's commented several times on how the Direct Sales market model was a far more attractive alternative to the newsstand model. Essentially it was "Buy 3 bundles, send back 2 unsold bundles" versus "Buy as many bundles as you want at a 60% discount and DON'T RETURN your unsellables." You might want to do a feature about how the Direct Sales model restructured the comic book industry and made a number of products available that would have never been sold at newsstands or even book stores (as one DC Comics insider once said "The book stores had their chance and THEY BLEW IT!") until Barnes & Noble changed their sales model to possibly compete with Amazon. If you're interested, you could also do a feature on how Marvel issued a Second Printing of a few GI Joe titles for a large retailer and CHEESED OFF distributors like Diamond at the same distributors meeting that I attended in '86...
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs Год назад
@@noneofyourbusiness4616 I believe a few independent publishers like NOW Comics attempted to issue special comic collections sealed in polyethylene bags at a number of 7-11s around that time to expand their marketing options. I remember a Terminator package on display at one of those stores and I thought "That's odd." So odd that it even had a Comics Code label on it! So you might have been a witness to a failed retail experiment on NOW's part...
@muttjones222
@muttjones222 Год назад
Great video on the New Universe! I think part of the root problem with the line was a fundamental misunderstanding of what made Marvel a success in the 60s. Marvel did succeed with that 10% edge to DC in regards to realism but that was only in regards to its characters. The heavy use of science to justify the powers and technology was because that was the style of the time. The 50s and 60s were a renaissance period for science fiction and that carried over in so many major pieces of entertainment. Marvel was just riding that wave with the added draw of relatable characters. With the New Universe however, they just hyper focused on the “realism” angle without any sense of direction or purpose. If this was a universe without aliens or super science or magic then what does it have? You’re setting yourself up as a place with “have-nots” instead of “haves.” It’s negative marketing. Aside from the myriad of other problems the books had, maybe they could’ve done better if they promoted what they had to offer as opposed to what they didn’t offer.
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
"Aside from the myriad of other problems the books had, maybe they could’ve done better if they promoted what they had to offer as opposed to what they didn’t offer." That is a *very* astute observation.
@JohnSmith-ox3gy
@JohnSmith-ox3gy Год назад
You have cyberpunk without the cyber. So punks?
@MarkTyger
@MarkTyger Год назад
I was a big fan of the New Universe back in the day. I was a pretty casual reader at the time, but I was definitely familiar with the different vibes both Marvel and DC characters had. New Universe had a lot of interesting ideas and a more grounded tone that, by todays standards, feels more like pitches for some 'urban fantasy' tv series. But I don't see that as a detriment! As a D&D kid, I'd gotten into other superhero TTRPG's like Heroes Unlimited and Champions at the time New Universes was happening. So being able to see a superhero continuity happen in real time was very fascinating, and still influences my writing and world continuity design to this day. In later years, of course, I learned about how divisive both the series and Jim Shooter was, and how the New Universe was basically shredded by behind the scenes shenanigans. But I don't think it's a coincidence that I also got in on the ground floor with Valiant, Ultraverse and Comics Greatest World back in the day, again to see how to start a superhero universe from the ground up. Behind the scenes, Jim Shooter may have been resented for running tight ship in the looney bin that was Comics Publishing and Marvel Comics, but with the consistently strong work that appeared during his tenures in the business, I can't help but think he gets unjustly vilified for having a strong vision about this work and having the tenacity to follow through with it. All we can do is speculate. I wasn't there to see it happen behind the scenes. But while many may complain about the execution of his works, I still feel like I "get" what he was going for creatively and something about that brain space has always appealed to me. So thank for trying to make the New Universe work, Jim Shooter. Despite the industries attempt to bury it, I think it was more influential that anyone wants to admit.
@daniescott3000
@daniescott3000 Год назад
I think we as comic fans can all agree we could use Jim Shooter right about now in modern Marvel comics.
@austinreed7343
@austinreed7343 Год назад
Yeah… but the art of the New Universe is on par with the art today.
@eveahn9595
@eveahn9595 Год назад
​@@austinreed7343 no.
@jd6473
@jd6473 Год назад
@@austinreed7343 They art is way better than that of today.
@javib2978
@javib2978 Год назад
Where DC comics had Alan Moore. Marvel had Jim Shooter. It was disappointing to see these two be kicked out. Jim Shooter was an amazing person of talent. Along the likes of Alan Moore.
@austinreed7343
@austinreed7343 Год назад
@@jd6473 It really isn’t, when you take ALL of the art of today into account, the better stuff is better than this and the worst stuff is way worse.
@jamessatter7418
@jamessatter7418 Год назад
Strikeforce was amazing early on. I didn't realize it was originally envisioned as part of the New Universe.
@94evangelion
@94evangelion Год назад
On paper, the New Universe is a cool idea. A shared superhero universe that moves in real-time & have grounded realistic stakes. It's a pity it didn't work out.
@jackmars931
@jackmars931 Год назад
Wild Cards did it much better.
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs Год назад
​@@jackmars931 Probably because Wild Cards started out as prose stories created by science fiction authors that were later adapted into independent comic books. Time could have also been a factor. Maybe the S/F writers didn't have a tight deadline as the Marvel Bullpen did...
@jackmars931
@jackmars931 Год назад
@@DavidTSmith-jn5bs I know how WC started out. I was talking about the books, not the comic adaptations. They did a much better job of creating a "shared superhero world" than Marvel did, regardless of the medium.
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs Год назад
@@jackmars931 The point that I was making was that the S/F authors had an advantage over the comic book writers and artists. I added the fact that their work was adapted into comic book form while you were comparing apples to oranges. My mistake....
@jackmars931
@jackmars931 Год назад
@@DavidTSmith-jn5bs Comparing the development and set up of a cohesive super hero world is apples and apples. But I'm not going to argue with you, I'll just leave you to stew in your own stupidity. Have a nice life.
@AceLM92
@AceLM92 Год назад
I'm met Jim Shooter at a con last year, really nice guy, and I asked him about being burned in effigy. He told me that the story was true, but it was not the reason he was fired by the higher-ups. I can't remember the reason he gave, but he explained the higher-ups did not care what the people beneath them thought of Shooter.
@yoyoyiggityyo17
@yoyoyiggityyo17 Год назад
Do you remember now
@AceLM92
@AceLM92 Год назад
@yoyoyiggityyo16 yes. I believe he said it's because the owners of Marvel wanted to sell the company, and him being the editor in chief made it a hard sell because he used company money ethically for the employees (raised page rates, royalties, health benefits, etc). What's funny is when the company was put up for sale, he came 2nd in the bid. He would have come first, but the person who did win was in bed with the owners.
@djconvoy
@djconvoy Год назад
Starbrand is an interesting book, at least under Shooter, as it's basically a man laying himself bare for us to see, right there on the page. It's almost overwhelming when you understand the self inserted nature of the main character; almost too revealing. Very peculiar, and some elements of the book clearly carry over to Shooters work on Solar. It is interesting, if nothing else. DP7 is actually a fairly solid book, too. You could easily see it just being a normal Marvel title (just have the paranormals be mutants or something), and Gruenwald said as much; it would not have been difficult to sheer of it's New Universe trappings. I had heard the rumor before of Speedball possibly being created for the line, but not Morituri. I suppose that makes some sense, as Morituri is so far removed from anything else Marvel was doing and seems to hardly fit into any part of their publishing ethos.
@SamGuthrie1977
@SamGuthrie1977 Год назад
I agree. DP7 and Shooter's issues of Starbrand were the best of the New Universe. I think the consistency of the Gruenwald and Ryan team helped make it good. I'm usually a fan of Byrne, but his Starbrand was such a jarring departure from what Shooter established, I didn't care for it. I suspect Morituri was disconnected from the New Universe because of the Horde alien takeover of Earth aspect of the book. It wouldn't have jived in a shared universe with the rest of the NU titles.
@richmcgee434
@richmcgee434 Год назад
@@SamGuthrie1977 Seconded, or thirded I guess. Still have not forgiven Byrne for what he did to Starbrand. DP7 was just solid and likeable all through its run, although I don't love where they went with the characters past the book's end - which again, stems from Byrne's meddling with the line.
@SamGuthrie1977
@SamGuthrie1977 Год назад
@@richmcgee434 Yeah I'm with you. I'm a huge Byrne fan, but I can honestly say that his Star Brand was probably the only thing he's ever done that I patently disliked. Turning Connell into a crazy villain and destroying Pittsburg, just because he didn't like Shooter, felt very petty. I think it makes it worse that the Shooter and Romita Jr issues were so good and established Connell as an interesting character. Admittedly, the whole time loop concept Byrne injected at the end of Star Brand was kinda interesting. But I thought he explored that concept a lot better in Next Men a few years later, anyway.
@richmcgee434
@richmcgee434 Год назад
@@SamGuthrie1977 Yeah, the loop was definitely better executed in Next Men. Everything Byrne did to Star Brand felt like deliberate sabotage, but that final concept was something he obviously decided deserved another try in a book he cared about. Honestly can't say I've liked his work much at all past the old X-Men run with Claremont though. His art remains fine, but his plotting reeks of a hatred of what's come before and a desire to make changes solely for the sake of change - and his ego.
@SamGuthrie1977
@SamGuthrie1977 Год назад
@@richmcgee434 Byrne's got a big ego, for sure. But I liked a lot of his post X-Men work. I thought his FF and Superman tapped the fundamental appeal of those characters really well. I was a big fan of his Alpha Flight too. I even kinda like his late 90's stuff that a lot of people are ambivalent about, like Superman Batman: Generations and his Wonder Woman, despite the fact that, like you said, his X-Men era is clearly his prime. But pass for me on that Star Band run. It wasn't only the story there, his art looked completely phoned-in too; as if his heart wasn't in it at all, and he was just there to stick it to Shooter.
@Nono-hk3is
@Nono-hk3is Год назад
Shooter being the best thing to happen to the company, and being a creative dictator, are not necessarily opposing or contradictory assessments. They just represent the viewpoint of owners/investors and of the creative teams, respectively.
@castironchaos
@castironchaos Год назад
Star Brand started out with an interesting concept: an ordinary everyday guy is suddenly gifted with the most powerful weapon in the Universe. He spends the first twelve issues of the series being wishy-washy, unsure of what to do and how to live his life; while events are happening all around him. But that wasn't what the readers wanted. Sales dropped to the point where Marvel decided to revamp the series, and the entire New Universe as a whole. That was when they brought in John Byrne to revamp the New Universe. He did what he always does in his comic books, namely massacre uncountable number of innocent people in an attempt to shake things up. This was known as THE PITT. 😁 Byrne's writing has had a streak of cruelty to it from the very beginning, though it seemed to get worse after he left Fantastic Four and revamped Superman. He had no problem with allowing people to be killed off in his stories in horrifying numbers, usually innocent bystanders. Even in his Superman stories, rarely did an issue of the series take place without the Byrne Body Count growing little by little. I'm long since convinced Byrne was playing some sort of a joke by having Star Brand become a "super hero," and end up being present at a comic book convention when his alien nemesis showed up and blew the entire place up. "Estimated casualties are over five thousand!" screamed the TV news...until two pages later in that issue, when the "second White Event" or "Black Event" occured and left a smoking crater where the city of Pittsburgh had been Hence the title THE PITT. It was at this point that I decided to stop reading John Byrne's stories in general. Update: Out of curiosity, I looked on Google for some commentary on the New Universe. CBR (Comic Book Review) had an article stating "11 Reasons Why The New Universe Failed." Halfway through this article was this little tidbit: "But Shooter's reputation didn't exactly help the [New Universe] project; he was hated by many people inside Marvel. After he was fired, Marvel artist and writer John Byrne held a party at his house where disgruntled employees literally burned Shooter in effigy, stuffing the dummy with unsold New Universe comic books. Byrne also used 'Star Brand' to destroy Shooter's beloved Pittsburgh."
@afroscifizianzcomix7836
@afroscifizianzcomix7836 Год назад
Fair points. I actually loved the New Universe. There was a very science fiction feel to the whole thing. I thought it was wonderful. You can see how Shooter used similar concepts for a science fiction super hero universe where people age in real time in his Valiant and Broadway Comics line. Also John Byrne's Next Men had similar concepts. The only titles I have missing issues from are Merc, PSI Force and some later issues of Justice.
@DrAJRobak
@DrAJRobak Год назад
It's a great book through issue 7, after Shooter there aren't that many great moments in my opinion. The editors have said later that the Pitt was not an jab at Shooter, but it's too perfect to not be at least somewhat intended. I've really been enjoying the new universe though, a friend and I are reading it chronologically and podcast reviewing each issue. It's been a lot of fun so far, with not as many "dud" issues as I would ahve thought (we are getting to the issue #9's)
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
I cut that bit (the Shooter effigy) of the video down to its core because I couldn't find really solid sources of information about it. Although, I do believe the party occurred before Shooter was fired? Honestly, I read that it happened before and after a few times. I went with before because I believe Mark Gruenwald said it happened before the firing. (If memory serves.)
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
I didn't read everything. I pretty much skimmed the books to get a good feel for direction and story and all that. Aside from the first few issues of some books, once a creative settled in they weren't too bad. I hope you continue to enjoy reviewing them. Do The Pitt, The Draft and The War, too. You might as well be complete. :)
@RodrigoGonzalez-tf9cj
@RodrigoGonzalez-tf9cj Год назад
Tu comentario es interesante y tienes un punto Byrne mata extras por montones como en la mayoría de las películas de acción los 80s y 90s (Incluso las de ahora) pero rara vez esas muertes eran gratuitas. En todo caso de Pitt deja mucho que desear y si la historia de la quema del monigote es verdad escogió una forma muy poco profesional y mezquina de vengarse.
@Anders010
@Anders010 Год назад
Jim Shooter, what a legend.
@joelpartee594
@joelpartee594 Год назад
That's very diplomatic.
@jesseperry9602
@jesseperry9602 Год назад
I really liked a lot of the New Universe titles. In particular I loved DP7, Nightmask, and Spitfire and the Troubleshooters. I also liked Starbrand too. There were some really cool concepts in The New Universe.
@sird2333
@sird2333 Год назад
Nice to see someone who has love for Nightmask! That was my first New Universe from a bag of “collectible” comics I got at Town n Country in my little town in Missouri. Such good memories!!!
@JO-uy6zs
@JO-uy6zs Год назад
I collected DP7 and Spitfire. Started ok,ended horrible
@queenannsrevenge100
@queenannsrevenge100 Год назад
I was also a huge fan of New Universe, especially Star Brand - it felt like I was on the ground floor of so,etching cool and new. And then the Pitt happened, and the rest was a ***ing mess. Though to be fair, in hind sight, it’s probably what would happen if supers suddenly showed up in real life: whole world would probably crash and burn in a year 😂
@DoomMomDot
@DoomMomDot Год назад
I always thought the problem with the New Universe is they couldn't figure out how superheroes would change the world around them. once you have superheroes, you really can't have "the world outside your window" and attempts to both keep the realism, and the super heroics were doomed to fail.
@davidmullen6011
@davidmullen6011 Год назад
Good point! When I look back on the titles I see a lot of them are actually like television proposals - the grounded nature of the concept lends itself to television adaptation. But as you say the fundamental problem (one of them that is) is that the White Event, by its nature, changed the world. Except for the purposes of the editorial direction, it didn't change it one bit! DP7, Psi-Force, Star Brand, Spitfire, Justice... all of these characters operated below the public and media radar, and so disturbed absolutely nothing in the world order - when Ken Connell is going off to stop terrorists it is all done in stealth, no one knows he exists. And so the status-quo remains static. The Pitt/Black Event on the other hand was so far off at the other end of the extreme that it destroyed any sense of reality for this universe and its characters.
@ThePinkMan
@ThePinkMan Год назад
If only Watchmen came out earlier, they could've ripped off some ideas from there. Like Dr. Manhattan spurring the advancement of technology by synthesizing large amounts of uncommon resources.
@DoomMomDot
@DoomMomDot Год назад
@@ThePinkMan Watchmen was one of few comics that really explored the effect of costumed heroes would have on the world around them. The New Universe tried to go in the opposite direction by having the "paranormals" somehow kept secret and the like. Then, suddenly they threw it aside as they had Starbrand destroy Pittsburg
@ThePinkMan
@ThePinkMan Год назад
​@@DoomMomDot I think the problem is that New Universe writers were still stuck on lot of the older comic tropes.
@DDlambchop43
@DDlambchop43 5 месяцев назад
@@ThePinkMan they didn't stick with one trope tho; they had a competent villain that didn't go for death traps or boring monologues.
@MartyNozz
@MartyNozz Год назад
Little surprised that Psi-Force did not get much of a mention. Maybe because it was really strong from beginning to end in terms of writing and art. The characters made appearances in Ewing's Ultimates series.
@ericqel-droma7628
@ericqel-droma7628 Год назад
Psi-Force was my favorite NU book, especially early on. I loved “psychic Voltron” as a concept, especially when different characters became part of the mix. It’s too bad all of it was ruined by The Pitt and what came after.
@chrisw6164
@chrisw6164 Год назад
I fail to see how the man who was responsible for putting Frank Miller on Daredevil and Walt Simonson on Thor pushed either of those creators to “compromise their talent”. Both were bold moves and gave us re-imagined versions of both characters from groundbreaking talents.
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
I do agree! Shooter was instrumental is supporting both Miller and Simonson. At the same time, creators such as John Byrne, Marvel Wolfman, Gene Colan and Mike Zeck, to name a few, are all on record for disagreeing with Shooter's editorial suggestions/demands. This simply highlights the seemingly contradictory nature of Shooter's tenure. There are those that found his direction and support helpful and those that found it too controlling.
@allenrubinstein3696
@allenrubinstein3696 Год назад
@@StrangeBrainParts Well, and it seemed the stuff that creators were chafing at were some of the elements that we fanboys liked the best - the line-wide continuity and shared history, editorial cohesion, reliable publishing schedules. I remember hearing that a lot of the vitriol came in the latter parts of his tenure, when crossover events would mandate the creative team disrupt their narrative flow to incorporate whatever malarky the editorial staff had agreed on. Granted most of these crossovers were terrible, but it shortly became standard industry (meaning both Marvel and DC) practice. Interesting to consider that Shooter is largely responsible for me becoming a decade-long dedicated superhero consumer, and then he was largely responsible for me stopping. After literally thousands of floppies churned out from two corporations, I became much more interested in stories that had the creative integrity of self-contained work unfiltered from a single cartoonist.
@DrAJRobak
@DrAJRobak Год назад
@@allenrubinstein3696 Yeah that makes it super challenging to read Marvel and DC now. Way too many changes and interruptions to tell a good story.
@allenrubinstein3696
@allenrubinstein3696 Год назад
@@DrAJRobak So don't. There are so many other ways to enjoy fiction. Thiers is fake.
@DrAJRobak
@DrAJRobak Год назад
@@allenrubinstein3696 I basically am already following that advice. I think she Hulk the the only big 2 book I’m reading.
@therussiancomicbookgeek
@therussiancomicbookgeek Год назад
Night mask looks interesting Can you maybe do a follow up video on the individual titles
@khiclark31
@khiclark31 Год назад
Too bad the new universe didn't last. I first discovered these comics at a candy store near my elementary school (after the New Universe had long been over)
@mangamegs
@mangamegs Год назад
This universe was like a proto valiant universe.
@afroscifizianzcomix7836
@afroscifizianzcomix7836 Год назад
I agree. Sci fi with characters that aged in real time. Broadway Comics had similar ideas too.
@samwill7259
@samwill7259 Год назад
Just another reminder. Comic books forget NOTHING. All of these characters have, are and will come back the second any writer with a good idea gets half a chance. I know for instance that Starbrand and Nightmask came roaring back rather recently. Don't think of the New Universe as a failure. Think of it as a primordial soup that will always produce sparks of life. Marvel is mythology. And mythology always comes back around.
@kiethveseyofficial
@kiethveseyofficial 7 месяцев назад
With the current rot that's a part of the writing crew of Marvel as well as Disney, I don't think so in my opinion.
@jimgillespie6109
@jimgillespie6109 Год назад
I'm glad you touched upon the Valiant Universe. I remember reading a letter in an issue of Comics Buyer's Guide where the writer compared and contrasted the characters of the VU to their predecessors in the NU. The similarities seem to make it appear that Shooter was really keen on the idea of a universe where the laws of physics more closely resembled those of our own reality.
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
I thought the connection was kind of self-evident, which is why I didn't hammer that point too hard. Also, I didn't want to go back and read all the early Valiant and New Universe titles to actually have the evidence to back it up. Ha ha ha. But, on the surface, they do resemble one another.
@DrAJRobak
@DrAJRobak Год назад
Yeah in interviews about Valiant (which Shooter wrote 99% of in the beginning) he talks about his aims to have more science-based worlds and problems, and his occasional frustrations with writers who weren't able to make that work. There is a fun interview out there somewhere where Tom DeFalco explains the hoops he had to go through to convince Shooter that they could have a Robot-like Tank in Kickers Inc #2. Continuity between issues and to a degree, the universe was big with him too.
@nickchavez720
@nickchavez720 Год назад
Was Shooter an authoritative, no nonsense leader who was a hard ass? Yes. But Marvel was in a rough spot and sailing adrift because it had no real leadership. It had some major issues. Marvel needed that kind of leader to get it on track and help it live to its full potential. It didn't make him the most popular, but popularity doesn't lead to a good business.
@wtk6069
@wtk6069 Год назад
Both of the Big Two have had multiple imprints fail because ultimately they end up leeching talent and sales from the main line. The only notable exceptions were Epic and Vertigo, which succeeded by targeting a mostly different audience from traditional comics readers and often a very different talent pool of creators, too.
@BlueHero45
@BlueHero45 Год назад
True, it almost felt like a knock off of the big two but was created by one.
@donkrouskop4753
@donkrouskop4753 Год назад
It's frustrating that personal beefs with Jim Shooter seemed to color the creative talent's perception of the New Universe project as a whole. Because in the end, though Shooter would certainly have gotten the glory had the New Universe flourished, comics aren't made for executives - they're made for readers. And we, the readers, largely wanted this experiment to succeed. I was particularly invested in STAR BRAND. Despite a few hiccups (the Debbie Duck speech quirk got tiresome rather quickly), the early issues were quite good, and I legitimately believed a universe could be built around that title. NIGHTMASK and MERC also had potential. But hey, Jim Shooter's a jerk, so let's just half-ass the whole thing and (literally) burn it down the first chance we get, right? I'm a fan of John Byrne. I'm not a fan of what he did to STAR BRAND and the New Universe.
@JasonMehmel
@JasonMehmel Год назад
What caught my eye... that Ditko's creation of Speedball was initially for this project. And, as far as I can see, it isn't being touted as 'from the creator of Spider-Man' or that Speedball was / could have been the Spider-Man of this project. Which seems like a missed opportunity!
@erikwirfs-brock2432
@erikwirfs-brock2432 Год назад
Speedball is a really strange comic itself, Steve Ditko doing spider-man type stories in the 80s but making no adjustments to his art to make it seem contemporary.
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs
@DavidTSmith-jn5bs Год назад
​@@erikwirfs-brock2432 That was a common problem with most his work in Marvel titles. His early work on Hulk and a Captain Mar-Vell book left me with that impression..
@camilocuba6927
@camilocuba6927 Год назад
My only memory of these books is always seeing them in the quarter bin at my local LSC in the early 90’s, lol. Great channel btw!
@ivane5110
@ivane5110 Год назад
I liked the New Universe at its start; now I know that it was under Shooter that it was to my liking and under Byrne that I disliked it. Interesting, since Byrne's DC post-Crisis work I disliked so much that after a decade and a half of always getting at least 1 Superman title per release (sometimes all the ones on the stand, including any slight cameos) I stopped buying or even reading about the character. Even more than the actual works themselves, I liked the potential the New Universe had. The same potential Valient got closer to in many ways, before also changing for the worse to my tastes. Shooter again did well and even closer with The Good Guys' and much of that universe before that also met an untily demish two issues into Schism. What a shame; the New Universe didn't get the proper backing it deserved; it might very well have been exactly the groundbreaking milestone that Shooter envisioned. And who knows, we might be over a decade into an MCU where Justice, DP7 and Starbrand are the household names?
@TheMorlun
@TheMorlun Год назад
It's still bizarre to me that Shooter thought to sell this and basically nothing else (with an exception of covers) as 25th anniversary. Imagine you have a birthday and somebody creates completely different human being as a gift and than doesn't even give it to you. Also, Kickers Inc. is something that should be in third wave of titles, not at the launch of new line. I tried to read these titles recently and while some titles were interesting (Archie Goodwin did good job on Psi Force), they felt like nobody wanted to write them.
@stevew8513
@stevew8513 Год назад
I think nobody wanted to write them because Marvel didn't want to pay them. Reading an interview with Shooter years ago, he said their original budget was $2 million. After a while, the owners of the company told him to only spend $1 million. Later, they told him only spend $500,000. Then they asked him how much money had they spent up to that point, which was $50,000, and they told him to not spend any more. So he couldn't attract the high quality creators and writers that he had wanted, they had to make do with artists just starting out that would work for low pay and whatever creators would sign on. Hence the disjointed nature of the New Universe. I remember some very iffy artwork in some books (I'm pointing at you, Justice), but then there were some really well-drawn titles. It's just a shame that Marvel couldn't manage more than a half-hearted attempt at creating a new shared universe.
@92TheEdu
@92TheEdu Год назад
Always a pleasure to be notified with new content from this amazing channel
@eozoon
@eozoon Год назад
I enjoyed DP7! Would make a good TV series.
@afroscifizianzcomix7836
@afroscifizianzcomix7836 Год назад
People would think it was a knockoff Doom Patrol if they made it now.
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
Or X-Men...which was the comparison made at the time.
@RodrigoGonzalez-tf9cj
@RodrigoGonzalez-tf9cj Год назад
si
@FerretPirate
@FerretPirate Год назад
It was called Misfits of Science, and it was lovely. Also brief. :)
@Cincinnatijames
@Cincinnatijames Год назад
@@FerretPirate I loved Misfits of Science as a child but I tried watching it not too long ago and found it to be unwatchable.
@michaelburke4048
@michaelburke4048 Год назад
I actually loved the New Universe, especially D.P.7, Nightmask, and Star Brand.
@jacoblear1265
@jacoblear1265 Год назад
I loved DP7 back in the day
@dougputhoff
@dougputhoff Год назад
I think were three major problems with the New Universe: 1. Inferior talent, compared to DC's having John Byrne on Superman, Frank Miller on DARK KNIGHT and BATMAN: YEAR ONE. Alan Moore on WATCHMEN, etc. 2. Recycled characters. Many of the New Universe's character felt like dollar store takeoffs of established characters: Star Brand for Green Lantern and Justice for Judge Dreed, for example. 3. And overcrowded market. The year 1986 was the year of the black-and-white boom (which quickly turned into a bust) and Marvel was putting a crapton of new titles at the same time. Something had to give.
@juniorjames7076
@juniorjames7076 Год назад
To me, the mid-80s were the golden age of comics, soo many amazing titles both independent and major published, not to mention foreign graphic novels began appearing not just in comic specialty shops, but Walden Books and Barnes & Noble. By the early 1990s it all came crashing down. At that point I remember shifting to exclusively buying independently published graphic novels.
@DDlambchop43
@DDlambchop43 5 месяцев назад
actually you hit it. Shooter said in a later interview that new universe was gonna be mainly marvel's run on DC heroes. it's just that the idea got reworked so much that starbrand (green lantern) was the only one left that resembled the orig plan.
@x3rohour345
@x3rohour345 Год назад
Still... I love what Marvel was recently doing with Starbrand and Nightmask in the AVENGERS in 2015ish. Atleast until they gave up... again. Now in 2022, the baby Starbrand has been reborn, and I love that the Avengers are now taking turns rasing rasing a super-UBER-powered baby-little girl. Especially the motherly role Carol Danvers is trying so hard to get a grasp of with Brandy, a toddler so powerful that Captian Marvel is next to nothing by comparison. But still, like a truly wonderful foster parent, you can't help troubled children by being afraid of them. Also, my wife and I both had Starbrand tattoos for our 21st wedding anniversary; she being my Star & I her Moon.
@caincha
@caincha Год назад
I remember seeing those comics and not being remotely interested purely because I had no idea what it was. Perhaps if they at least advertised it in the regular Marvel comics it could have been better..? That and more stable team working on them - with a decent budget of course. That being said it's ironical that it was John Byrne's work that drawn me to the comics. And I really really liked it then. Oh and about Jim Shooter: controversial as he was to me he was the best thing to ever have happened to Marvel as a whole. Not great for artists - writers included - but very very good for the stories and to us readers by extent. I usually say that he was to Marvel what Steve Jobs was to early days Apple: helped the company to be the best out there as well as making himself the most hated person in the business.
@markhutchins7808
@markhutchins7808 Год назад
I'd say you have to judge the New Universe in the context of its times. I was heavily into comics back then. I've always thought of the mid 80s as the Alan Moore era. Swamp Thing and Miracleman were a breath of fresh air. Lots of Marvel stalwarts had moved over to DC over the first few years of the 80s and it livened some DC books up. The indie comics that existed then gave us more variety than we'd had in years. When the New Universe arrived, it was a flop. There was nothing fresh about it. In a comics world of many flavors, the New Universe gave us melted vanilla ice cream. So disappointing.
@HeyImRosko
@HeyImRosko Год назад
Glad you're back up and running! The New Universe was a thing I was only peripherally aware of via that iconic ad featuring the white event bolt. This is the most informative thing I've encountered about it in the almost 40 years (!) since, and I'm grateful to finally have that bit of industry lore laid out and hole in my knowledge filled. I hope you have a deep dive on the professional history of Jim Shooter on the docket. In recent years a fuller and less creator-based propagandized picture of the man has slowly been revealed, so it'd be cool to get as much of the whole story as possible from as thorough and even handed historian as yourself.
@myretronation
@myretronation Год назад
I totally loved this line, and every issue (and the later Quasar issues) are a permanent fixture in my collection
@Scudboy17
@Scudboy17 Год назад
I was there when the NU was released and I bought at least the first issue of each title. I liked the idea of a more realistic comics universe, but the stories always felt half baked and missing something that made other comics interesting. I think it done ways it was TOO realistic. The heroes never felt that powerful and a lack of any really interesting villains pretty much doomed the project from the start. There were just sooo many unlikable characters it was hard to enjoy those books.
@aaronwilder2775
@aaronwilder2775 Год назад
Honestly, it sucks that nothing big came from the New Universe because the idea is so cool, a super grounded universe with intriguing powers and characters. Now all Marvel does is publish the same stories with the same characters over and over and over again
@SamGuthrie1977
@SamGuthrie1977 Год назад
DP7 and Starbrand were the best of line, in my opinion. The first 6 issues of Spitfire were solid, and PSI Force would have been good but the inconsistency of constantly changing creative teams hurt it. Changing creative teams seemed to be standard for the New Universe and I think that hurt it as much anything. Justice, for example, reads like an entirely different title altogether after Peter David takes over, essentially ignoring all of the first year of the book. I always felt like they put all their effort into the initial concepts, but then seemed noncommittal about executing them in any consistent way. I tend to be dismissive of complaints about Jim Shooter, especially from entitled creators who are always saying they aren't given enough creative freedom. Jim was a working class guy who'd been in the business since he was 13. He turned Marvel Comics around by running it like a respectable business; expecting books to be published on time, continuity to be respected, and storytelling to be clear and concise. He also went to bat for his creators, getting them increases in pay, more benefits, and he established the Epic Imprint so they could own their own creations. There were too many seminal runs published under his tenure, and sales were too high, for me to believe he was some sort of tyrant doing something wrong.
@JennySparkz
@JennySparkz Год назад
Agree one hundred percent.
@AndrewLuke
@AndrewLuke Год назад
David doesn't ignore Justice's first year. It's a pivotal part of the character's arc: from his emergence as a Dexter-ish serial killer, and later a legal enforcer, to cope with his justice warrior persona. Only five issues into the reboot and the justice warrior returns, through Tensen's issues of powerless. With that re-awakening of the old, comes the world of Damon Conquest for at least two issues. Under David and Weeks, the new version is an ongoing conflict between Justice 1.0 and the world outside your window as Tensen struggles to find purpose and peace. In this way it mirrors the war between Winter and Spring.
@SamGuthrie1977
@SamGuthrie1977 Год назад
@@AndrewLuke I get what you're saying. I suppose David didn't entirely ignore the beginning, but he did change the initial concept of Justice being an off-world alien to a human. That was my point about all the New Universe titles. I thought the constantly changing creative teams and jarring direction changes in almost all of them generally hurt the line. DP7 was the only one that had consistent creators with the same direction and feel throughout the whole run.
@AndrewLuke
@AndrewLuke Год назад
@@SamGuthrie1977 I think your view of Justice is the general consensus on the book's structure. There's many reasons, outside of the story, which support that. From Justice #15 (aka 2.0) you've stable creatives for more than three issues. You've got new in-house approaches to New U editorial including copy-writing and graphic design. Then fresh paper stock and full bleed. All these detract from the subtext, that, this is the same story. (Even tho like Moore's Swamp Thing it's a retcon.) DP7 did retain it's creators throughout the run, but I found the direction quite shaky after the initial Clinic storyline. (Wasn't that classic fun!) Less shaky with the other books. They got creators who stayed through year 2 to year 3. A much over-looked one is Fabian Nicieza's Psi-Force (#15-#32) There were two or three artists on that run, but it's distinctive, organic and a great read. If you find it, snap it up! Gripping thoughtcomics!
@richmcgee434
@richmcgee434 Год назад
Agreed. A great deal of the resentment toward Shooter stems from his demanding that deadlines be met. It's a sharp contrast from the way things run at the Big Two these days, and it's been getting worse for the last twenty years. No one knows how to herd the cats any more.
@neodecker
@neodecker Год назад
Star Brand is still one of my favorite characters. I also liked PSI Force, and Spitfire, and still have all of my New Universe comics.
@all-americancomics7497
@all-americancomics7497 Год назад
The New Universe was obviously the forerunner to the original Valiant. I always wondered how that would've turned out if Shooter hadn't been ousted from Valiant. Shooter had some...interesting ideas in what turned out to be his closing months at Marvel. Replacing all the heroes with new people and such. As current day sales prove, that wouldn't have worked. Still, creating an all new universe from the ground up is a Herculean task at the best of times and when your budget is slashed overnight, it's darn near impossible! I wonder why they still tried to push ahead with this once that happened? Great video! Thanks for the info.
@chrisw6164
@chrisw6164 Год назад
I read the New Universe comics until the bitter end. It was much better after they chopped the line in half and made the overarching storyline more concise.
@afroscifizianzcomix7836
@afroscifizianzcomix7836 Год назад
Agreed.
@TheMorlun
@TheMorlun Год назад
Great video. Missed one detail - Al Ewing also revived Psi Force and Psi Hawk idea relatively recently in his Ultimates run.
@djconvoy
@djconvoy Год назад
I had forgotten that, as well!
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
Good catch! I missed that completely. And I rather enjoyed that run, too!
@christophertaylor9100
@christophertaylor9100 Год назад
I liked the New Universe, there was a lot of great stuff in it and some meh stuff. Overall its was pretty creative and was building something interesting until they got to the "Pitt" stuff where it lost its way.
@robertskitch
@robertskitch Год назад
Well, that's good timing. Here I was just three days after this video came out looking up what the Marvel New Universe was about. I remembered reading one of the the comics (Spitfire and the Troubleshootsers) as a back-up strip in the back of the UK print of Transformers but couldn't recall much about it.
@MaximumWarp2099
@MaximumWarp2099 Год назад
I was a kid when the New Universe came out and was very hyped for it. It was cool getting in in the ground floor of a new line of comics. Me, my brother, and a bunch of our friends couldn’t wait to get them when they came out. I liked Starbrand and Nightmask. My brother like Spitfire and the trouble shooters and Kickers inc. A friend of mine was into Merc and Justice and Psy Force. I even have the Starbrand tattooed on my left shoulder. That’s how much fun the NU concept was to me. But, alas, it did fall apart fairly quickly for all of us. Probably with that first year. Mainly when the creative talent that started the books left the books as you mentioned. Still, I loved the concept and wished the Warren Ellis reboot had been able to be fully fleshed out and explored. Sure, Hickman brought in the concept into his Avengers run but it wasn’t the same to honest. Anyway, I will always have a soft spot in my heart for the NU. What’s funny is the failure of the NU is partly why I avoided the Ultimate line when it started. I figured it would fall apart after a year. Boy was I wrong.
@TheSnapdad
@TheSnapdad Год назад
I was a senior in HS and was slowly moving from Marvel to DC. I was also buying Eclipse and other indie comics, my comic dollar was stretched to the limit and nothing in the NU (except for the first few issues of Star-Brand) was interesting enough to make me want to drop current titles. When I saw the title Kickers Inc it made me believe the NU was not serious.
@KardboardKenny
@KardboardKenny Год назад
i still have all of my Jvstice books.
@legionkahn
@legionkahn Год назад
Whats funny is guys like Byrne who hated Shooter did the best work of his entire career under him. Some of the best runs in Marvel history came out under Shooter.
@brianmurphy250
@brianmurphy250 Год назад
Very true! Life/business is so very complicated.
@DarkAlex1978
@DarkAlex1978 Год назад
Because basically Shooter knows that creativity needs some degree of discipline when you have to create fictional universes, expecially if many different people contributes at once.
@legionkahn
@legionkahn Год назад
I agree. One of the reasons Marvel went so off the rails for a lot of people was guys like Morrison and Bendis really had no editors to keep them in check and were allowed to just do what they wanted regardless of the long term damage the stories might have been creating. Really most editors at Marvel even today are just empty chairs.
@brianmurphy250
@brianmurphy250 Год назад
@@legionkahn Hell yes…and it continues to this day. The writers have destroyed X Men and the editors are afraid to do anything lest they be called a racists/homophobe/sexist
@theplaguedoctor5773
@theplaguedoctor5773 Год назад
I loved DP7 up until the War started. I didn’t care as much after that.
@richmcgee434
@richmcgee434 Год назад
Agreed. Arguably the most consistent and enjoyable read in the whole range. Star Brand was very close, but only until Byrne came along and ruined it out of petty spite - which events led to the War, which ruined DP7 as well.
@anthonybilello3160
@anthonybilello3160 Год назад
DP-7 was awesome! Unfortunately, today the title sounds like the precursor to Backdoor babies 9. 🤣🤣🤣
@incubustimelord5947
@incubustimelord5947 Год назад
Lol! 😂 Yeah the name couldn't be taken seriously today. Like the old sword and sorcery comic book Thongorr. It was a great Conan the Barbarian and Red Sonja: She-Devil With A Sword spin-off comic from the late 1970s to the early 1980s. But that name would make people laugh their asses off, lol! 🤣
@TheBeird
@TheBeird Год назад
Good stuff as always dude. Really informative 👍
@99Michael
@99Michael Год назад
Yes, I bought the New Universe being a loyal Marvel reader and MMMS member. I kept waiting for something interesting to happen and found the stories and art tedious. I never cared for Shooter's mandate that all the stories needed to be self-contained into a single issue; I felt this removed the nuances and characterization that made Marvel books so endearing and relatable. I recall one FF panel by Jack Kirby of Reed and Sue sitting at a table with a cup of coffee, discussing the upcoming battle with Dr. Doom. It was so relatable as watching my parents sit down and discuss making a house payment. What Shooters Universe lacked was an organic feel to it. The above FF scene was written and drawn by people that experienced such a moment with their spouses. PS. Am I the only one thinking Jim Shooter looks like Bizzaro Superman going for a job interview in the photograph?
@michaelmcclain6704
@michaelmcclain6704 Год назад
Also: Marvel UK, Ultimate Marvel, Marvel 2099, Marvel Mangaverse, and Shadowline/Epic Comics. Marvel made a number of efforts to create new IP. Strikeforce Morituri also comes to mind.
@cravensean
@cravensean Год назад
I bought the first issue of each of these when they came out and none of them were interesting enough for me to read any further. As Frank Zappa would have said, "Strictly commercial."
@radiak55
@radiak55 Год назад
I do wish for Marvel to have another go and allow a new universe in concept similar to Vertigo or a creator owned imprint. Kickass was the only success in recent years I remember from a similar attempt with Icon but that was pre-Disney. I feel that having a separate universe and imprint would allow more creatives to expand on their ideas, not because of continuity but with the freedom to do more. I'm somewhat tired of seeing variants of the same established concept like it was a cheap toy of Artic proof Batman or Underwater mission Spider-Man. Ultimate universe was a good attempt but it came at a time were the general absurdity baked into superhero comics was not favored, hence all the grim that came from Ultimatum.
@GWrightstuff
@GWrightstuff Год назад
Again everyone gets stuff so wrong. Eliot Brown did not edit the entire New Universe line, and he was not succeeded by Howard Mackie. Eliot was indeed let go by Shooter ( NO ONE WAS GOING TO BE ABLE TO DEAL WITH SHOOTER ON THESE TITLES) before the titles ever came out and this was the beginning of the titles completely falling apart. The titles he edited were given to Michael Higgins. These were Starbrand, Nightmask, Justice and Kickers Inc. DP7 was edited bt Ralf Macchio, Spitfire and the Troubleshooters was edited by Bob Harras, Merc was edited by Jim Owzley(Peter Christopher Priest), and Psi-Force was edited by Bob Budiansky. The editors involved were in no way to balme for any of the downfall as they were taking marching orders for all of the changes from Shooter. And the creators couldn't stand it an left, which is why so many titles had so many creators despite the editors trying to make the titles as good as possible. Owzley was fired next, and Larry Hama took over Merc. Miek Higgins was removed by issue 7-8 and THAT is when Howard MAckie was brought in. Shooter was fired from the company shortly after and that is when titles were cancelled and rethought.
@jjrbarnett
@jjrbarnett Год назад
I had a lot of these. Starboard, Merc, Justice. I remember liking it but not enough. About as good as Secret Wars. Basically DC won out with Crisis and Alan Moore's work.
@andrewelder2739
@andrewelder2739 Год назад
I read a few of the New Universe titles, but "Psi Force" was the one I liked best and still revisit every few years. As for what did it in, I noticed one annoying thread throughout all of the titles I read -- from Psi Force, to Star Brand, to DP7 -- all of the characters HATED their powers and wanted to get rid of them! But the books are being marketed to an audience of readers whose ultimate dream is to have superpowers! It was tough to relate to characters who were constantly whining about the thing all of us comic fans DREAMED about :D
@cariganpintalba9498
@cariganpintalba9498 Год назад
Crisis on Infinite Earths wasn't some great marketing plan. It was to fix the continuity problems created by different DC publications.
@cosmictyger
@cosmictyger Год назад
I mean Marvel could have used “Justice” to replace ROM, the Space Knight, to keep the Dire Wraiths and the Brood relevant.
@Cynix79
@Cynix79 Год назад
Excellent work as always! You always seem to hit my personal sweet spot. Picked up Star Brand #14 last week in a quarter bin… one of the weirdest Byrne issues I’ve ever read…
@richmcgee434
@richmcgee434 Год назад
The good parts of Star Brand are all before Byrne got his hands on it. DP7 is arguably the best (and most consistent) book in the line overall, but Star Brand's early run is very good too.
@brianfarkas8172
@brianfarkas8172 Год назад
Eternals is right up there with these and that got a movie.
@KameronFranklin
@KameronFranklin Год назад
I was a big fan of Justice. I recently completed my run of Psi-Force, which crossed over directly with Justice, and the "realism" felt like a detraction from that title.
@oldschoolrivethead
@oldschoolrivethead Год назад
I was 13 years old when New Universe launched and I remember standing in line to buy a copy of every #1. Since I hadn't experienced many new comic launches, I was convinced that these #1 issues were going to be worth a fortune in short order. I knew nothing of the creators, politics, or mandates going on behind the scenes, I only knew the advertisements I'd seen in other Marvel books. After the 2nd issues came out, I whittled it down to only 2 or 3 that I wanted to keep following, but didn't go beyond #7 with anything. These days, I barely remember any of the content or characters at all except for a scene here and there. I sometimes wonder if this might be worth revisiting.
@bazt2053
@bazt2053 Год назад
I loved star brand in the early issues. It was unsure of itself but the concept had so much potential. I think the DP7 the Pitt and star brand would make great TV shows.
@thecat5872
@thecat5872 Год назад
Good God almost 40 years ago it was a real attempt at new characters with new stories, I guess it didn’t work , I read Starbrand liked it they’ve actually resurrected the SB in modern comics , it was a good attempt, too bad that.
@joseangelhernandez5274
@joseangelhernandez5274 Год назад
I completely forgot about this. I remember seeing the ads and not finding the look and design of the characters very appealing.
@gyga100
@gyga100 Год назад
Marvel in the 80s: New Universe Marvel in the 90s: Marvel 2099 Marvel in the 00s: The Ultiverse
@bigguy7353
@bigguy7353 Год назад
Not sure anyone forgot it, just that Millenials and Zoomers think nothing happened before they were born.
@lorenzofortunato388
@lorenzofortunato388 Год назад
A bunch of the new universe characters were used in the 2015 secret wars tie-in mini series "squadron sinister" . Very fun comic, i highly recommend it
@TheGenXGeek
@TheGenXGeek Год назад
I read these when they were new. Loved Starbrand, Justice, and DP7. I actually just bought and am rereading DP7 in TPB. But definitely was Proto-Valiant.
@Duck_Dodgers
@Duck_Dodgers Год назад
Wish they'd do the whole series
@residentgrigo4701
@residentgrigo4701 Год назад
The Universe that failed twice.
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
A universe so nice it failed twice.
@raulzavala9061
@raulzavala9061 Год назад
Looks like Shooter was trying the same thing with Valiant when he was forced off. I was collecting Transformers and GIJoe comics at the time and the New Universe titles didn't entice me with stupid names like Spitfire and The Troubleshooters and Kickers, Inc.
@3tp
@3tp Год назад
I think the biggest problem was misspelling the title Justice. The word is spelled with a U not a V, duh.
@stormstouvenel9059
@stormstouvenel9059 Год назад
I bought all of the first issues of the new universe. I liked Star brand and dp7.
@kevinkeene1593
@kevinkeene1593 10 месяцев назад
Interesting that Jim Shooter hated the way that DC editor Mort Weisinger treated him and other writers and artists. But, when in power, Shooter acted pretty much the way Weisinger had.
@a0040pc
@a0040pc Год назад
I've been waiting for years for someone to do a video about the failure of the New Universe. Any chance of doing a video about the failure of the Inhumans during their huge push in Marvel Comics
@jb8280
@jb8280 Год назад
As a pre-teen(at the time)comics lover Marvel kid, I know I personally hated all the New Universe titles. Not a single one of them held my interest or inspired ideas of my own. I loved to draw the X-Men and Daredevil and had aspirations to be a comic penciler(which I actually did for a few years) so comics that captured my imagination were like gold to me. Ironically, I met both Jim Shooter and John Byrne on separate occasions as a youth. Jim was gracious and like a mentor the second he saw my work. Provided me with advice and cards of people to send work to once I upped my chops. Conversely, I met my hero John Byrne at a con in the 80s. I was about thirteen and waiting in line for his autograph or sketch. When my turn came up, he decided to ignore me and glad hand some guy who walked up to make some original art deal. I get it, but Byrne looked over at me as I was not getting the hint and told me to “F@ck Off.” This grown man told this kid who worshipped the ground he walked on to Eff off. Great. What an icon. I walked away pretty confused until a hand gently touched my shoulder and this bear of a guy asked me to come sit with him. He and I drew all day long as people came up to him for autographs and sketches. He was the sweetest guy to me and to everyone. He drew the most awesome drawing for me at the end of the day. He taught me so much that afternoon. About comic illustration and ego and how to be kind to people. His name? George Perez. I guess it’s true what they say…never meet your heroes. I guess the point is the New Universe and John Byrne both equally sucked…lol.
@TitularHeroine
@TitularHeroine Год назад
This story is awesome
@allenrubinstein3696
@allenrubinstein3696 Год назад
I've never heard anyone confirm this, and it may be a product of my own head, but I always figured the New Universe was the same place that the Beyonder created/became at the end of Secret Wars II. I mean, Secret Wars II was written by Jim Shooter, so it would make perfect sense and be a prime example of garbage producing garbage. Not that it would have been necessary to have one lead to the other (fiction doesn't need to "create a universe" to create a universe), but just using the word "new" in the name, and the chronological proximity of one to the other, I thought it was at least implied. In any case, it's hilarious that the second Secret Wars has never even gotten a trade.
@juniorjames7076
@juniorjames7076 Год назад
I think I gave PSI Force or Star Brand a try, can't quite remember. Those covers looked absolutely dismal on the spinner racks!!
@zkeletonz001
@zkeletonz001 Год назад
One of the things I appreciate about the New Universe is the small number of titles compared to the normal Marvel Universe. In order to follow something like Secret Wars you would have had to buy all these different comic titles. It didn't matter if you liked those characters or comics. Want to follow the story? Buy ALL the comics! ugh. But, with NU you could follow everything that was going on without having to buy 20 different titles, especially after everything got paired down to just four books. I think if the budget hadn't gotten blown up, and they'd been able to put some veteran talent on it, the project could have succeeded. Or, at least lasted somewhat longer. There were some solid characters and titles. Starbrand, DP7, and Justice were the best of the bunch imo. Some of the character's stories ended up going some interesting directions, but some of the others felt rushed and half assed, like nobody really knew what to do with them.
@jeremysmith4620
@jeremysmith4620 Год назад
How could Kickers Inc fail? lol
@richmcgee434
@richmcgee434 Год назад
Much as I like New U, some of the books were real head scratchers. Had its share of duds for sure.
@radtoys501st
@radtoys501st Год назад
I've not forgotten them because I'm reminded every time I look in the 50 cent bins....there they are!
@craigfuller5067
@craigfuller5067 Год назад
I’d be down to read these.
@g.a.2997
@g.a.2997 Год назад
After watching this video and the ultimate autopsy, it seems like every so often marvel creates a grounded and realistic superhero universe like the new universe, ultimate universe and supreme power universe.
@rockbarcellos
@rockbarcellos Год назад
Wow... I started reading comics regularly around the time when SM 2099 began to be published, I always wondered who the hell that Nick Prophet character was, he seemed so damn random and both important and unimportant at the same time....and now I finally have an answer, amazing! haha Very interesting story about the New Universe, great content
@DrAJRobak
@DrAJRobak Год назад
If I remember right, Peter David even wrote a novel with Justice/Tensen/Net prophet as a main character
@rockbarcellos
@rockbarcellos Год назад
@@DrAJRobak ah cool, I wasn't aware
@GreatAukEntertainment
@GreatAukEntertainment Год назад
Another fantastic video!
@BadNewsYouNeedToKnow
@BadNewsYouNeedToKnow Год назад
Some interesting ideas and some really horrible designs. Unfortunately Shooter’s take on super powered beings trying to deal with the norms or life is almost always a death sentence in the superhero comic biz. He pacing and designs are better suited for tv budgets. I could actually seem some of these properties have new life on streaming. Look at how boring most of Disney #s Marvel streaming is……It’s perfect for the New Universe!!
@gabrieldjatienza6971
@gabrieldjatienza6971 Год назад
Star Brand, drawn to resemble Luke Skywalker. DC , with their 1986 mini series Legends, made a Star Brand parody named Sun Spot, who met an embarrassing defeat from Green Lantern Guy Gardner! It was drawn by John Byrne!
@briancurtis6022
@briancurtis6022 Год назад
Thanks for mentioning CrossGen too; that was a wild ride!
@JohnSmith-ys1wr
@JohnSmith-ys1wr Год назад
I actually bought the first set of issues, titles and still have them, even a couple of the one shots. Starbrand was pretty good but the rest were so so.
@marcusbrothers5221
@marcusbrothers5221 10 месяцев назад
John Romita senior is a master. His son however, gives me hives. Hate his style.
@ianfontanet4230
@ianfontanet4230 Год назад
You know, imagine what it'll be like, when Hasbro and Idw have made spin-off comic series of the main My Little Pony comic series? The Marauder Six, and the Cutie Mark Crusaders, would both be released in July 2013, after issue 8 of the main series. The Champion Four would be released in January 2015, after issue 26 of the main series, while after issue 19 of the Marauder Six and the Cutie Mark Crusaders spin-offs. The Anti-Mane Six would be released in January 2016, after issue 38 of the main series, while after issue 31 of the Marauder Six and the Cutie Mark Crusaders spin-offs, while after issue 13 of the Champion Four spinoff. The Six Pillars would be released in January 2018, after issue 62 of the main series, while after issue 55 of the Marauder Six and the Cutie Mark Crusaders spin-offs, while after issue 37 of the Champion Four spinoff, while after issue 25 of the Anti-Mane Six spinoff. And the Young Six would be released in January 2019, after issue 74 of the main series, while after issue 67 of the Marauder Six and the Cutie Mark Crusaders spin-offs, while after issue 49 of the Champion Four spinoff, while after issue 37 of the Anti-Mane Six spinoff, while after issue 13 of the Six Pillars spinoff. The Marauder Six and the Cutie Mark Crusaders spinoffs will both have 91 issues, running from July 2013 to July 2021(since the spinoff series would have 7 months hiatus after March 2020). The Champion Four will have 78 issues, running from January 2015 to December 2021. The Anti-Mane Six will have 65 issues, running from January 2016 to November 2021. The Six Pillars will have 39 issues, running from January 2018 to September 2021. And the Young Six will have 26 issues, running from January 2019 to August 2021. (If only Hasbro would allowed it, then things would've been different.)
@hanykhalil2264
@hanykhalil2264 Год назад
This is really cool and interesting. Thanks for talking about it. I was wondering where star brand came from. 👍👍👍😁
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
Thanks for watching!
@superdave8248
@superdave8248 Год назад
I was a fan of the comic line. Although in hindsight I can understand why it wasn't popular. It was a series of stories that would probably have had a chance to evolve into something big but I don't think the writers really had a grand scheme in mind. You had the Psychologist who could enter people's dreams. You had the average Joe with Affinity Jem like powers rehashed as a "Star Brand", you had the football athlete with supper human indurance, you had the group of everyday people who suddenly woke up one day with oddball abilities that they struggled to control, you had the runaway teens who were cherry picked to have their powers merged into a being of extreme power, you had the federal agent who had a "shield" and "sword" he could call upon for close combat, you had the woman in a armor suit, and then you had the mercenary - a guy with no powers at all but whose line of work was interfering with his kid and ex-wife. In short, you had rebranding of several Marvel charcters. Spitfire was Ironman. Merc was Deadpool. Justice was The Punisher only with a set of powers. Kicker's Inc. was literally a rehash of every hero group on cartoons at the time. Starbrand was anybody from The Silver Surfer to Vision (pick a affinity gem of choice). Psi-Force was every rebellious teen group that came across Marvel's desk. As a teenager I didn't connect the dots. See the obvious. Later on in life I did. And to be far to this comic line, it probably should have never see print. The only reason it did was because Marvel and DC were flying high. Making money over fist on pretty much everything out the door. This was a time when a new Punisher, Spiderman, X-Men, or Wolverine comic book came out every week. And in some case more than one a week. They could do no wrong. Half of these books didn't even survive a year. The remainder lasted three I think. And yes, I can see the distributors playing a role in this. I didn't have a comic shop specifically in my area I could pull these books from. I had to hit Bookstores and even the local Grocery Store believe it or not. And even then I still struggled to get every issue. Back then if a comic didn't sale at least half a million copies it was considered a failure. And sadly, most of these books didn't even come close. I seem to recall at one point Psi-Force was selling around 200k copies but this still wasn't enough to save it. Especially since the book was part of this New Universe brand that was being phased out. The writers of these books claimed that they would somehow brings these characters into the Marvel Universe and they did in one book. DP7 and a Starbrand character made an appearance in one Marvel Book. The short of it was that a Marvel Character found his way into The New Universe and needed the power of the Starbrand to return home to the Marvel Universe. I think the moment I knew this franchise had reached its end was when they released "The War". In a nutshell, Uncle Sam had drafted people with abilities and they were sent in as front line troops in a particular confrontation. It has been a long time since that graphic novel came out so I don't remember the details, but I remembered thinking that there really wasn't any benefit to bring in these people with special abilities into the fight. The outcome would have been the same with standard US troops as without.
@DDlambchop43
@DDlambchop43 5 месяцев назад
agreed. the war was a really weak sendoff. didn't help that the one good arc villain in the whole imprint had been depowered in starbrand #18 and became...boring. He was still president, but boring.
@angusmacfrankenstein7227
@angusmacfrankenstein7227 Год назад
I read exactly one issue of New Universe: an issue of _Spitfire._ I skimmed the wiki page, and I note that the title changed mid-series, so I’m just going to use the part that remained the same. And I think, years later, it was some sort of transitional issue. Someone had murdered the tech team who had mechanically augmented specialties, and the young woman nicknamed Spitfire was imprisoned in a dark room being harassed by a huge lumbering monster of a man named Brick as a test by some disembodied voice. I thought the issue was at least interesting, and had a kind of adult feel-not like those dubious bookstores, but there was a feeling of reality, that I didn’t see in a lot of comics I had read up to that time. In all honesty, I don’t think I’d seen a New Universe comic on a spinner rack before or since (at least during those years, and honestly I’ve waaaay moved on)-I don’t think they were getting to the spinner racks at the local drug stores! Somehow this issue made it. I’ve used the term “Interesting Failure” for a work that has good hooks, but the execution didn’t work. Based on what I read in that issue long ago, I’d call it an Interesting Failure. Postscript: Ever consider a video covering the history of !-mpact comics? (Spelled this way because of spell check and auto-formatting-sorry!)
@StrangeBrainParts
@StrangeBrainParts Год назад
Yes, I have! I actually liked !mpact back in the day. I've been kind of wary to go back and re-read them in case they aren't as good as I recall. Also, I'm not sure why it didn't last...so that's something I'd need to research. Which is incentive. :)
@FerretPirate
@FerretPirate Год назад
@@StrangeBrainParts As someone who keeps liking comic lines that fail, such as New Universe, 2099, and !mapct, I also would be interested in your take on !mapct.
@kevinbirge2130
@kevinbirge2130 Год назад
Keith Giffen’s work on these titles was astonishing, especially Justice. Giffen’s run on that title is worth seeking out. Otherwise, these books were just fair to middling Marvel content typical of the era.
Далее
The History Of Charlton Comics
18:41
Просмотров 42 тыс.
Ко мне подкатил бармен
00:58
Просмотров 186 тыс.
Обменялись песнями с POLI
00:18
Просмотров 110 тыс.
Vince Colletta: The Inker Who Ruined Jack Kirby's Art
20:31
Justice League: The Giffen, DeMatteis & Maguire Years
14:26
Micronauts: The Classic Mantlo & Golden Year
14:16
Просмотров 21 тыс.
The Alan Moore & Grant Morrison Feud: An Examination
16:43
The Origin And History Of Adam Warlock
21:22
Просмотров 19 тыс.
Smells Like 90’s Comics: The EXXXTREME RemiXXX
19:07
The History Of Watchmen
20:36
Просмотров 30 тыс.
Ко мне подкатил бармен
00:58
Просмотров 186 тыс.