I just thought I'd add that by plugging the faded text author's clues into the foxy grid, a Fredditer was able to get the code "is Springtrap", which when combined with "my name", form's a line straight out of the silver eyes. You were right.
If you look closely at the sprite of the dog in the Fruity Maze minigame, more specifically its tail and ears, it becomes clear it isn’t a dog, but rather a cat. Yet, there is dog barking as ambience in FNaF4. I guess the Aftons had 2 family pets.
It’s been like 3 minutes and I already agree. Maybe a few parts are a little off but by far, the 4 authors and William being guard one, phone guy being og composer, Micheal being guard two and Freddy a representation of him and foxy being phone guy’s representation and the boss notes being shadow Freddy are all awesome.
I just Pieced together something. The reason why William wears Jeremy's Freddy suit Head on Night 7. is because William believes so much that his son is him and he is his son. just as this logbook states. and since William wore Freddy Before Jeremy. I feel this is Really hard to dismiss.
so 50 animatronics for the custom night I think 50/20 mode would be called "Shadow Freddy" Mode. And I would love the "King of FNAF" to try and beat it...
So for all of you in the comments, I am writing a FNAF novel, set 1 year after the events of FNAF6. The link to the WIP is here: sites.google.com/site/hdhgdyudfigsudtgdysydd/fnaf-endofanera Currently, I am working on Chapter 5. PLOT: John, a 17 year old man is fired from his job, and is hired at Freddy Fazbear's pizza, unaware of the dangers lurking inside the walls of this place. If he is caught by them, will either die, or, suffer the same fate that Michael did...
I probably think a few people already know This. I noticed in the survival logbook On PAGE 35 Mike(Michael) Drew some casual bongos and In The FNAF Sl on night 3 the key pad it says casual bongos Then I realised "Casual Bongos" from the survival logbook and yea I just found out that 😂😅
9:31 But wouldn’t the fact that the FNaF3 Office exists at all have to mean that the Logbook is made during or after FNaF3? The image of Chica using a Macintosh laptop, which wasn’t available until 2006, proves that The Logbook couldn’t have existed in 1992.
The images of the FNAF 3 office look in a lot better repair than the actual FNAF 3 footage. It does seem like this book was published in the future, but before the actual time of FNAF 3.
Check Scott’s steam post where he lists all the mechanics of the animatronics for the Ultimate Custom Night. Scott just referred to Ennard using pronouns such as “he” and “him”.
It's hard to be sure who actually was allowed into the birthday party. But it think Sammy's fate can be seen in what happened to Nightmare Balloon boy in the Halloween edit. He didn't have a normal birthday either.. someone grabbed him by the legs and dragged him off. So I don't think Sammy was at that party either.
"someone grabbed him by the legs and dragged him off." lol. someone predicted the fate of themself in my book 2 weeks before I even thought of making that book WOW
the Immortal and the Restless cutscenes from FNaF SL seem to parallel the Afton Family, with Vlad representing WIlliam and Clara representing William's wife, and the baby representing Michael. In the last Immortal and the Restless cutscene Clara burns down Vlad's house. There are only two instances of a place being burned down: The FNaF3 fire and the FNaF6 fire. Henry caused the FNaF6 fire, so that leaves us with the FNaF3 fire. It's possible William's wife burned down Fazbear's Fright to free William from his prison inside Springtrap.
Well, Freddy's is attached to the Afton House, so setting the House on fire would essentially mean setting fire to the restaurant too. FNAF 6 wasn't actually a fire though, the building was still intact, it just got too hot for living metal to survive. I guess it would depend on what William's Wife was up to during FNAF 3. My current theory is that the small head on Mangle is the only part of her remaining.. but she could have had another horcrux animatronic?
Some ideas regarding the Toy animatronics: -if in FNaF4, the reason the Mangle in the Girl's room can't put itself back together is because Shadow Bonnie devoured the soul from the big head, leaving only the smaller head, then chances are Shadow Bonnie devoured the souls of the Toy Animatronics too. We see in one of the FNaF3 teasers Springtrap standing behind the box full of empty Toy animatronic heads, and that would imply Springtrap (who is controlled by Shadow Bonnie) is responsible for what happened to them. - In the novels Henry made mini-animatronics for his daughter: Ella, Theodore, and Stanley. In FNaF4, Toy Park Girl (Charlie) has a "toy collection" of toys of the Toy Animatronics. Scott drew attention to this when he asked "In The FNaF4 minigame, why would the Tiny Toy Chica be missing her beak?". Scott referring to the toy as "Tiny Toy Chica" instead of "Tiny Chica Toy" would imply it isn't a toy at all, but a smaller version of Toy Chica. Meaning the Toy Animatronic toys in Charlie's "toy collection" are actually not toys at all, but smaller versions of the Toy Animatronics. This matches up with Henry making mini-animatronics for his daughter in the novels. Meaning the reason the Toys were built in the first place was because Henry made them for his daughter, the way he did with Theodore and Stanley. This explains why Toy Freddy and Toy Bonnie look so feminine despite being male, they were made in Charlie's image, and Charlie is female.
(Fnaf3) Michael’s mom: I need to help those children, they’ve been so lost and angry for so long they don’t know how to move on from it. I hope William and my son could see my messages on the walls so they’ll know that I’m still here. William Afton: He’s not my son no matter what! I will kill that fucker in the chance I’ll get it! Nightmare: Where am I in the relationship? Can any of you fellow freaks awknowledge me? Oh well, I’m just going to burn down this building and ensure that all of you will go done with it. (Seriously, am I always going to be ignored? IGNOred! IgNORED! IGGGGNOOOORREDD! Why do none of you fucking care? Does no one care about who I used to be? Will they even fucking care if they know who I AM? They’ll just treat me like a waste a space like they always did. They’ve regard me as piece of trash they left in the bin when I alive, when I lived with them,and after I dead? The only attention I received from was from that piece of shit who placed me in this fucking hell in the first place and ensured that I will always fucking suffer at every moment I breathed!)
I've decoded why there are red numbers throughout the book. If you find them all, It will reveal golden freddys CHILD NAME in the wordsearch. Numbers are found in pairs, and they work like co-ordinates.
6:26 How do you even mistake their sprites?- Micheal is dark-maroon purple like a squished grape. William is the stereotypical shade of purple. Micheal has pants, William needs to learn to put some clothes on- anyways, he apparently forgot his dentures or smth cause he got no teeth, while Micheal does have some. William is standing like an alpha on TikTok live doing a thirst trap while Micheal is leaning down looking at his grippers as if he wants to eat them like cherry tomatoes.
you stated that foxy was his avatar if spring Bonnie's avatar was someone else's avatar than why does William "Dave" Purple guy Mike Schmidt Fritz Smith Afton use it in the novels and "Trust" to use it in FNAF 3(i mean the guy could've tried to hide behind the arcade machines or tried to punch a hole out of Freddy's because he has kool-aid man strength)
You can't punch a hole out of a ghost. In FNAF 3, Purple Guy evaded The Fifth Ghost as long as he could.. then finally jumped into Spring Bonnie as a desperation measure. I think he believed wearing the suit was protect him from the ghost, that prohibition the main animatronics have against attacking each other. And it did.. The Fifth Ghost couldn't get him. But the ghost already inside the suit, Shadow Bonnie, could. William might control Springtrap in the novels.. but Sammy/Shadow Bonnie controls it in the games, holding William prisoner inside.
what do you mean a hole out of a ghost, i was referring to the building. he can bust down walls, so why couldn't he bust a wall out the back of the pizzeria.
The title of the new book is revealed.... The Fourth Closet. Funtime Freddy is on the cover. I guess we’ll finally know who’s possessing Funtime Freddy. But if he’s in one of Charlie’s closets, he’s definitely a horcrux of Charlie.
Well, that depends if any of Charlie is in him or not yet. I think you start with the smallest robot, then put (most) of the soul into the next largest robot, and at the end the Lion's Share of the soul is in the largest robot, while trace amounts remain in the others. The 4th Closet might contain an empty body just waiting to be claimed. Henry may have intended it for Charlie, but it seems like others want it too.
BlackfootFerret Something else I realized. The Funtime Freddy on the cover has black fur instead of pink. This could actually be a Funtime Lefty or a Funtime Nightmare.
in the new custom night: -Mangle and Funtime Foxy co-exist -Scrap Baby coexists with Baby and Ennard -Lefty and the Puppet and co-exist so its likely to be non-canon
Logan Scott That’s the frustrating thing about the Custom Nights. I look at them and see all sorts of lore hints, but then the whole NON CANON flag goes up, and I can’t actually use anything in a theory
Knowing how tricky Scott is, Mangle and Funtime Foxy could be totally different characters. I'm certain Mangle is a fusion of two animatronics.. but Funtime Foxy might have the dog in there somewhere. It's hard to know for sure unless we learn more. And it's not like Funtime Foxy is going to say anything anytime soon...
Charlie is Shadow Freddy.. AND the Puppet. Elizabeth (Baby/Ennard) might not be Charlie.. but she has a similiar story of having her soul torn in half to form good and evil sides. I do think Elizabeth was designed to teach us about Charlie.
I once made a FNaF comic series where it was a town made up of fans and you where the towns crazy person (I did that as a joke, please don’t hate me =I). I didn’t actually know that people called you the towns crazy person, because I just went on reddit and saw a comment thread of, “The worst FNaF theories” and it seems people REALLY don’t like your Lamar Afton theory or any of your theories. Oof that’s gotta be annoying to deal with.
Adam Qureshi They haven’t even seen my Lamar Afton theory yet, I posted a premature script and few others to read it. I can’t blame people for thinking me outlandish, I know a lot of my theories are far from the norm. But until another theorist can explain why a girl attacks us in FNAF 1, and how a little children have the superhuman strength to tear apart Mangle, I’m forging ahead
Yo I know this came out 3 weeks ago, and my question has nothing to do with this video, but My attention was drawn to something. In FNAF2, whenever you get jump scared normally, you get a bunch of static and mechanical noise... Could this mean you're actually a robot in fnaf2?
>for looking like a robot lol Stuffing one robot into another robot sounds ridiculous, but Ferret has already speculated about this very thing in previous videos, saying that the purple guy was already a robot, and was stuffed into the Spring Bonnie suit which was possessed by Shadow Bonnie in order to imprison him. Please do a little research when you try to argue honey bunches.
Blah blah blah something autobiography of a yogi I'm sure you have already heard the same thing over and over again to be disagreeing with it. On the subject of metal piercing metal, you'd need a lot of force or pressure. There's a MatPat video somewhere or other that shows just how much force an animatronic puts out (at least enough to crack through a skull) so does it really seem like that much of a reach to say an animatronic can pierce through metal? It already does so to bones (and bones can be hella strong)
pm1.narvii.com/6476/ac13036ca0588ce1bcb53816c140e4d43129e2e8_hq.jpg And supposedly the thing controlling your robotic character is a soul, not a brain. (If the old animatronics can move without a living brain to make them move, and know how to attack you, then so can just a normal robot, especially when said robot is programmed to.)
Wrote this comment at 3:10 (i have a habit of writing comments before the end of a video): You have some cool/interesting theories, however in FNAF3, Guard01 (aka W. Afton) becomes Springtrap unless you already knew that. The evidence that W. Afton is Springtrap is in FFPS's end credits.
Just because William is in Springtrap doesn't mean there can't be others in it too. Remember the picture of peeling away Springtrap's grinning face to reveal William's screaming one? William's being held prisoner in that suit.
The description for The Fourth Closet is now on Amazon. There’s a new pizzeria A new set of murders John is apparently the protagonist of the book (He probably has a role in FNaF 1-4 if he’s important enough to be protagonist)
BlackfootFerret after reading a good amount a TON of your theories came true and some of them you may run into some problems but I wouldn’t say it’s debunked. My username is jimbomiller on Reddit it would be a honor to discuss the new book with you:)
Miguel Farias Well... I was planning to have Dark Ferret actually be the narrator in “Fate of the Shadows”, making a dramatic exit, but I think he already left and moved on.
I've had nightmares about RXQ for a long time.. for a while I thought I might have been possessed by him. I'm trying to count the marbles in my head at the moment. But maybe, later, he could pay me a visit again.
How is remanent involved in your theory? How does jeremy see the perspectives of The puppet, freddy, and foxy in fnaf 2? Why is the restraunt always setup for a birthday party? How does fritz smith fit in your theory? Also for fnaf 4, many people say that the bite of 83 victim is who you play as since their are items that appear on the bed such as flowers, an IV bag, and pills. But why would a the kid need pills for such an injury?
BlackfootFerret it looks very cool but do you think any new lore will be revealed? I believe it’s going to show us what happens after midnight motorist
I think i figured something out On the nightmare foxy teaser, we see something that says OUT OF ORDER., and his eyes say 87. It is possible that Foxy did the bite
I'm not entirely certain. On one hand, I'm tempted to say "The Original Restaurant" where Take Cake to the Children Happened, since the Puppet is now Left-E, and one of the Rockstars. If you think about Left-E as the Puppet, that works. But if you think of Left-E as a bear animatronic that was added later on, then there must have been another restaurant for the Rockstars. It wouldn't be Circus Baby's Pizza world though, the Funtimes came from there
I'm still unpacking FNAF 6. And trying to figure out who New Springtrap is.. I'm not entirely sold in the explaination as given. I think Lamar is the unexpected office guy. And that New Springtrap is someone POSING as William rather than actually being him (he'd be pretty dumb to fall into an obvious trap like that) We don't have confirmation that Henry is actually dead. And I don't think Michael (or William) actually showed up. I think a FNAF 7 is very likely.
the heads in the box change almost everytime the fnaf3 office shows up in the logbook. In the "now you're getting it!" Foxy page, Mangle's head in the box is dark red, proving that Mangle came from William's dark red version of Foxy In the "Another chance to shine!" Foxy picture where Foxy blasts a light at us, the heads in the box aren't the Toys at all. Instead, the heads in the box are what appears to be Nedd-bear, Bonnet (meaning Bonnet exists in canon), and Bidybab . On the unfinished comic strip of Freddy and Foxy arguing in the FNAF3 office, there are completely never-before seen animatronic heads in the box. Except for the pink one in the back, which appears to be Pigpatch from FNAF6.
I guess some animatronics are versions of others, then. I'll have to look at the boxes again. I did notice in one shot all the eyes were glowing, like they were all Shadows.
Phone Guy is the one who set up Jeremy Fitzgerald to get bitten. And Foxy is the character that represents Phone Guy. Phone Guy must be the Older Brother Bully.
Remember the Aftons are androids, human souls living on in robotic constructs, some of which look human, while others like the animatronics do not. Death isn't the end for an Afton. Michael got put back together. That's how he was able to go from being the Bite Victim to starring in FNAF 3 and Sister Location.
BlackfootFerret I’m sorry to bother you but the new title of the book just got revealed!!! The 4th closet and I feel like it’s going to confirm one of your old theories. If the 3 closets contained older Charlie’s I wonder what the 4th. Would have in it?
BlackfootFerret I’m so EXCITED!!! I feel like all of the book mysteries are going to be solved. I really hope we get a good explanation on the fake blood but I think we both already know :)
not gonna lie but your apparently guard 01 is not a guard but it is actually the ghost of the 87 victom which is the crying child from fnaf 4 and before anyone responds with but that takes place in 83 its talking about the reasturant being open since and the sound files are talking about what the file it was ported from so the files aren't lore and still a soul being in different parts is kinda not possible also we in all games play as mike aka older brother afton and papa bear afton aka willam afton creats the sl animaltronics and builde to kidnap and not to preform which is why older brother afton is alive cause soul readue is left on the scooper giving him life once you include fnaf 6 lore it will explain more
some questions: 1. There's this weird dancing Shadow thing in the Dusting Fields area of FNaF World (on a stump right above the entrance to the mine). It looks like Twisted Wolf. Is it Twisted Wolf, or is it something else? 2. Why does Sammy seem to have three different androids for his teenage form? (The one that gets stuffed into Spring-Bonnie, the Bonnie Bully, and the Freddy Bully) 3. Who is Old Man Consequences? 4. Who is Sad Desk Guy? Why does Baby kill him? 5. Who possesses Funtime Freddy? Who possesses Bon-Bon? 6. Who possesses Toy Freddy?
I always thought the dancing shadow was a bear, probably Golden Freddy, although I really should rewatch FNAF World again. Does Sammy have 3 teenage forms? I counted BB (very young) humanlike BB (older) and the Bonnie Bully (teenage). They seem to get older. Old Man Consequences does resemble one of the crocidiles from Happiest Day. Perhaps an earlier soul trapped inside Fredbear/FNAF World? Not 100% certain who Sad Desk Guy is. Not sure who's in Funtime Freddy or Bon Bon, or Toy Freddy.
BlackfootFerret but aren’t the Happiest Day masks supposed to be the Mediocre Melodies Green- Happy Frog Purple- Mr. Hippo Orange- Orville Elephant Pink- Pigpatch Blue- The springsuit Carlton was put in in TSE Nedd-bear is nowhere to be seen, but the other masks besides the blue one seem to match the Mediocre Melodies
I never thought about Carlton and the blue suit. That's definitely a possibility though. So the Mediocre Melodies would be BEFORE Fredbears? At least in the novel world?
I heard that you regarded the Logbook as non-canon, Is this true, and if so, What changed? Also, I'd like to say a few things about the state of your theories at this point. For 1: If William is Foxy, and Fredbear is Henry, than Why is William's Wife not FT Foxy, and Henry's Wife not Spring Bonnie, It's just simple common sense, and yet according to the Afton Family horcruxes, It's actually Backwards. 2: Michael Is inside Fredbear for the entirety of Fnaf 4, No? So wouldn't it make sense for the Fredbear Plush to be the other half of Michael? The Fredbear plush even starts talking less and less over time as the game progresses, In this kinda situation, It only makes sense that what is going on here, is that Michael's GF half if trying to Help Michael's Jeremy Half survive his 5 Nightmares at Freddy's and over time Michael, and Jeremy are reforming again, that's why Fredbear Plush is entirely silent in the Ending cutscene, They are once again, *One,* and now The Puppet is helping Michael Escape Charlie's Grasp. I don't see why you had to bring Clara into the story in such an out of nowhere way. 3: In order for Michael to become GF and Guard 02 he would have to have his soul split in half, So when could this have happened? THE BITE OF 83! that could also explain a number of things, 1, the purpose of the name Michael Brooks, The Foxy in the 5th night cutscene may represent Phone guy controlling the animatronics to feed Michael to Fredbear, But who's to say this isn't the same as what happened in the Bite of 83? The Foxy kid (Who I'm gonna name Alex for the sake of not saying 'Foxy kid' over and over) Was like a Big Brother to Michael in a time where He had No one but else but his Mother that wasn't wrapped up in the Fazbear Insanity. but Alex liked to tease his 'little brother', and Scare him, It wasn't as bad as Michael's Personal hell we call Fnaf 4 was, but he liked to Scare him from time to time. but then one time, it went too far, And unbenownst to Michael, Alex, or any of the other people involved, Henry actually plotted to use Alex's little pranks to Kill off Michael, by Purposely making Fredbear's jaws have the Power to CRUSH a human Skull, Jeremy's Human Skull. This resulted in Michael's soul being split in half, and William then managed to take the two halves out of the Fredbear animatronic (Which is not yet possesed by Charlie) and out of Michael's Broken body. He put Michael into two Androids, and, Knowing that now, Every one knew that Michael was supposed to be dead, He managed to get Michael Secretly adopted by Alex's Family, The Brooks Family, Hoping that now that he wasn't an Afton, maybe his son could finally have the peaceful not Mad-scientist ridden life that was taken from him. 2, this could also explain why it took so long for William to finally get revenge for the death of 'Charlie' because Henry trying to kill of Michael actually re opened William's old wounds, causing him to go back into a dark place of Hating Henry with all of his being, but this time, HE COULD DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT. 3, This also could explain why Michael was seen as 'A child' but later in 1987, he's already old enough to have a job at Freddy's, Because later, when Michael was still probably around 15 (Assuming that Henry was exaggerating about the 20 years part cause that would make Michael old enough to be an adult by 1983 in order to be old enough to be a part of the original FFP.) Because The MCI wasn't that much later than the Bite of 83, Michael still was a Child, but 4 years later, He'd be 19, if he was 15 at 83. (This is the End of the Bite of 83 Split Michael bit, which you likely were going to give your own idea of events in Michael Afton's Horrific Journey.) 4: If SL is an AU, than obviously Fnaf 6 would be a part of the same AU, You're pretty much pulling a new AU out of the blue by Making 6 be not the same Timeline as 5. Sure, SL and 6 not being the same timeline as 1-4 makes sense due to the 4 games one story, But SL and 6 not being the same timeline as Each other, Would just be Terrible story telling, The Custom night Ending of SL even sets up Fnaf 6 perfectly, They obviously have to be the same Universe. Which brings me to some thing else, If Fnaf 6 is the same as SL, than How can two versions of Charlie, One being the Puppet, and the other being Baby, be in the same game? They Can't but Charlie(Puppet) can be in the same room as Baby, If Baby is someone else entirely. Tell me, Who is the Puppet the avatar of? Charlie? if Charlie already had the Puppet, Why design Chica? and If Charlie's Avatar is Chica, then who's the Puppet? the Puppet isn't the avatar of Henry's daughter, its the Avatar of WiIlliam's. Henry's Sister, Aunt Jen, Jennifer Afton. Lets use a little Mad scientist/Strategic Psycopath logic I'm sure you'll find familiar, If you we're ostracized from your family, for so long, and denied your chance at not only becoming a part of the family again, but also really Doing something Big, that you would be loved for, You'd want to hurt the one who Denied you all of it as much as Possible. How do you hurt a family as much as Possible? You kill an integral, And Dearly Loved part of that Family. He knew that He couldn't get Michael, even though Michael had, in his eyes, Taken the place of Freddy Fazbear from him, he knew that Michael was always under supervision, in some way or another, But his sister, Jennifer, Wasn't, The puppet is too thin to hold an actual Person inside it, Jennifer Didn't have a suit, Just a character that she designed, and affiliated with, and so, Without anyone realizing it, He managed to bribe a group of kids to make that day (Possibly her and Michael's Birthday) the worst it could be, By Locking her out of the place that She was supposed to be a part of, The Take Cake murder wasn't a heartfelt moment between Father and Daughter (That honestly is just ridiculous.) It was a partially insane man, Trying to take back the 'Love' that he felt like he was Denied, By Killing his Little Sister, and Stealing Freddy Fazbear's Pizza, ITSELF. (Phone Guy: "What Could Possibly Go Wrong") That could be a reason why In the books. Where Henry and William likely switch places, William/Dave is obsessed with 'Love', It's the Flip side effect, William was Ostracized in his family in the books, Like Henry was Ostracized by William in the first 4 Games. and that's Why the Puppet's eyes are Green, Because Jennifer's Eyes are green, And When The Puppet became possessed by Charlie in the 5 & 6 universe, Her eyes changed to Blue, the same eye color, as The 5 & 6's Puppet's Later apperence As Ennard. Jennifer's avatar had now been possessed by someone else, Someone that it wasn't supposed to be connected to at all, Unlike Henry In Fnaf 1-4, When William bought out 5 & 6's FFP/FFD He managed to get rid of the puppet, and later, His daughter, now grown up much older than she ever got to be in 1-4, and William designed a new Avatar for her, One based on what She looked like before She grew up, what she looked like back in the days of the original Restaurant, Baby, Based on the Green eyed girl of Fnaf 4. and this is where the equivalent of the Death of the Shadow's took place in this universe, Henry Managed to give his daughter, now Ennard, control of Baby, (Blue eyes) and She killed Jennifer/Elizabeth While Henry managed to pick off Michael, where he ended up being found in a Vent before William was able to save him by way of Animatronic Android Soul Science. And that, The way I see it, Is how everything Fits together. Family Tree stays constant, no SL making Charlie be William's Daughter instead of Henry's, No random AU making, like Making Fnaf 6 be an entirely Different Timeline, No One person being split in half and suddenly one half having an entirely different eye color. and, the Most important part, No Charlie Being Murdered by her OWN FREAKING FATHER.
What's wrong with Henry killing his own daughter? The entirety of the Afton family are crazy, so it's not to much of a stretch for a father to kill his offspring. Also, Henry, being the Cassette Man in FNaF 6, says in the ending "Daughter, I couldn't save you then, so let me save you now,'" as her murder plays in the background. In the Horcruxs script, it gives a reason for Henry killing his daughter. He tried to save her from being denied a place in a robot, which Michael denied her. He couldn't entirely save her but he can know. I don't know exactly what he means by saving her, but this is just something of an idea
Ok, I may be able to get that, Henry Killing Charlie makes sense under the right situation, But the fact that that means that Charlies soul was Split in half and made the Puppet, and Shadow Freddy, Other than him tying it to SL and the relationship between Ennard and Baby, the Puppet and Shadow Freddy have literally nothing to do with each other, And like I said, the only way The Puppet can be in the same existence as Charlie is if they're either too different people, Or if Fnaf 6 is the Finale conglomerate AU that Blackfoot says it is, Which is (In the words of someone who made a Comment on one of my Video's) Bull Shit Storytelling. In fact, The Entire Afton Family horcruxes script is finding clues where they DON'T EXIST. The only thing that could even remotely condone what he did to get those Ideas from is something that doesn't even apply to what Blackfoot was Using. He uses Golden Freddy writing Childrens drawings on the walls to tell a story in the first book as evidence for the Drawings, (Which Existed Way before Scott could have possibly even bothered to make a story this complex) being the story of the Afton family, and Golden Freddy didn't even write most of them, He Changed Select ones to tell a Story, I Didn't even have to read the book to figure that one out (Which I haven't), The Children drawings Are Just Children Drawings, If any of them are important and meant to mean something, they would be ones that pop up rarely like the Newspaper Clippings in Fnaf 1, Not what are obviously random, and Re Used Multiple Times, Drawings made by kids to give an account of how their days were at Freddy's, If there's any reason the Drawings we're Created, then it was some thing Fazbear entertainment made the kids be able to do, so they could decorate their walls, That's the only explanation for Why the drawings we're made that Isn't Complete Bonkers! He's even been using the Drawings for evidence for a Secret 9th Afton family member which obviously doesn't exist, While completely ignoring the mere Existence of Aunt Jen, Which is proof that (according to this family Tree) William HAS a Daughter, And even if the Drawings we're anything important, Who could the orange kid be, Oh I don't know, JENNIFER! She has a Darker skin tone, AND an Orange Shirt, If that kid *is* anyone (Which there's still no way in hell it is) Then It Would Be Jennifer, Not "Lamar Afton".
Well, true or not, you must admit BBF does tell a fascinating story. Also, something I think might support Lamar Afton's existence is from FNaF 6. You know that image with all the gravestones? Well, one of them is hidden, and it could be Lamar. Maybe, maybe not. There are 6 gravestones and 5 known characters in the game, aside from the player. Fritz reference William Afton, Jeremy is Michael Afton, the one far in the background is maybe Henry/Cassette Man (it makes sense considering that Henry is like a hidden character, so it makes sense to hide him), and the last two gravestones are probably for baby, puppet molten freddy in some way. But that's two out of three, so either thar hidden one is one of them, or two represents three somehow. If two represents three, then the hidden gravestone is the player, who is maybe Lamar as BBF suggests in the video. But then there's the whole if Michael isnt the protagonist, then how did he die thing. I'm sure ferret will sort this all out eventually
Of course its a Fascinating story, It's the single most Intricate theory to come out of Fnaf, But you can't tell/reveal a good story like this if you make up connections between character's, while Completely Ignoring other characters, Can I Tell you who else the hidden gravestone could be? Elizabeth, Elizabeth Has to be one of the the unseen grave stones, or else we'd have a important character missing, And like I've been arguing all this time, Elizabeth, IS Jennifer. The reason Charlie's isn't here is because Charlie & Sammy probably got there own with Henry up on the hill, Just barely out of sight of the camera. (Though I wouldn't be suprised if Blackfoot tried to say that Gabriel and Suzie are Sammy and Charlie's Middle names.)
I have somthing to tell you (I figured this out my self probly not important but still) on the page where the toys are ( page 42 and 15?) The toys might mean somthing I'll tell you... phone: phone guy (pg) flute: puppet? Girl doll: circus baby/ purple guys daghter music box: also puppet bike: ??? I don't know yet... Do you agree with me? 😀
@@BlackfootFerret Follow up question as I am going over the dialogue of fnaf 6 myself, do we play as more than Chica's Kid in FNAF 6? Or does Chica's Kid also do the scrapping? What would be in favor of that also being Chica's Kid would be Scraptraps line that "you may not recognize me at first, but I assure you, I'm still me". Michael would have previously seen him in the Springtrap suit in FNAF 3, and while clearly older, he doesn't look a that different? But would that lead to the conclusion that Michael simply was not present for Pizza Sim?
Remember me with horse I'm gonna make a montage of the whole fandom is it ok if your theories are in it it is to say goodbye to a good phantom and some good games
BlackfootFerret thx fnaf deserves a well goodbye and your theories I feel Like go in more depth than even matpat but thanks I'm gonna give fnaf a proper goodbye though
micheal had 3 three soul in a fan game final nights 3 into a part of the puppet he is got bitten by sammy the soul sleater or rxq and william put him back toghet and part of golden freddy
Look I know you think Michael afton is Jeremy Fitzgerald and William is mike, but are you kidding me matpat basically proved that Michael is mike and William is William
Perhaps. But the story pieces are starting to fit together remarkably well. For something as mindlessly complex as FNAF, that could be considered a sign of progress.
BlackfootFerret Some of Game Theory's theories have been confirmed. Look for the details Scott intended not weird obscure things. The theories should be descriptive not predictive.
Only a few of Game Theory's theories have been confirmed, and Scott made a point of saying he didn't find everything. I don't understand your last point. My theories have successfully predicted future events in FNAF. The Color Brothers predicted yellow Spring Freddy (Fredbear) would be the antagonist in FNAF 4. And that Jeremy would be the main character. The first came to pass immediately, the second is now coming to light. What stronger evidence can you have that a theory has some merit, other than predicting future events?
BlackfootFerret 1. Yeah, but he isn't going into the smallest tiniest details to form ginormous conclusions, and his theories have been confirmed. 2. I mean you should be using evidence to explain not to add extremely to the lore. You're actually really good at making these theories. I don't agree with everything, but some details you pointed out are really good like Phone Guy being the author. Do you want to collaborate? Do you have Reddit or discord?
I use Reddit, I have my own Twitter account ( twitter.com/BlackfootFeret ) and sometimes I hang out on Featherhoof or 2 Griffin's Discord. I wouldn't mind collaborating.
Question. Why does Henry call William an 'old friend' in FNaF 6? I know it's in an alternate universe. but, the family tree and how it's arranged shouldn't have changed. I may be wrong.
BlackfootFerret intriguing nonetheless lol a lot of stuff has been happening with fnaf recently. Just wondering did you get a stake yet in the fourth closet? I’m a little confused about something and need your help
BlackfootFerret okay so near the end of the book when Jessica and William meet Jessica talks to him about the fake blood and William Denys ownership of it. But in the book William uses synthetic flesh to repair himself and has unrealistic parts in him that should never be in a human body. A lot of people on Reddit say that’s Charlie’s blood they found (which is highly unlikely imo because the blood is where Dave got spring locked). The blood could just synthetic functional blood like you said. This just makes me scratch my head
It still could make sense, If William really is a Psychopath than he would Pretend to be a normal person between kills, He would be the opposite of a monster, A human, and whats the opposite of Purple? Gold!
@@BlackfootFerret Some guy on Freddit probably solved the Foxy Grid. It’s Evan, and that’s the name of Mike’s brother in the Real Jake story from FF #6. Bite Victim is Evan Afton.
There's.. only one problem... FNaF IV is specifically the FINAL CHAPTER of FNaF. Now, I'm not saying it's the last in the timeline, but it IS the last chapter left of the story, i.e. all the other games that were released AFTER FNaF IV aren't part of the story you're trying to solve, and while you could use info FROM these games to help you figure out the story like you've LITERALLY been doing this WHOLE ENTIRE TIME, actually INCLUDING them into the story is completely wrong.
Well, my focus is in solving FNAF 1-4. I think Scott added details to the novels and 5-6 to help clarify, so I mention those sometimes if they seem directly relevant. But I try to stay in FNAF 1-4 as much as I'm able.
BlackfootFerret well, I just read a bit of your script for "The Afton Family Horcruxes" and it's pretty clear you're including SL in that story, which, as I just said, is completely wrong. Edit: Ok, scratch that, I just read some more of your script, although I'm still concerned with your fixation on FFPS.
Maybe. It would take me a long time to crack though, I've heard Game Theory is working on that code with a lot of others, I think I'd do better to focus elsewhere.
This is the worst FNaF theory channel in 2018. It literally makes no sense. And for those who agree to his theories.. he freaking uses Harry Potter terms!!!
