Тёмный

The Geodesic Equation (better sound quality) 

dXoverdteqprogress
Подписаться 7 тыс.
Просмотров 8 тыс.
50% 1

Same as previous video but without the spooky voice. Enjoy!
Covariant derivative:
• Riemann geometry -- co...

Опубликовано:

 

16 сен 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 30   
@archishmore2654
@archishmore2654 7 лет назад
i cant understand why this genius is not getting views
@dXoverdteqprogress
@dXoverdteqprogress 7 лет назад
Cheers!
@ElliottCC
@ElliottCC 6 лет назад
dXoverdteqprogress You are awesome ! thank you for this channel !
@jacobvandijk6525
@jacobvandijk6525 5 лет назад
I like his videos too. But, don't forget, the real genius was EINSTEIN! Don't devaluate the term "genius", please. Reproducing the real thing is something else than producing it ;-)
@ozzyfromspace
@ozzyfromspace 6 лет назад
Mind blown in the best way possible! Just awesome. Might watch it a few more times to ensure that I really get the concepts hehe.
@ozzyfromspace
@ozzyfromspace 6 лет назад
I'm still mind blown by the clarity of your explanation... 5 hours later.
@ozzyfromspace
@ozzyfromspace 6 лет назад
Back at it again, because your content gets clearer and clearer the more I watch it. It's essentially learning by reinforcement.
@dXoverdteqprogress
@dXoverdteqprogress 6 лет назад
Thanks!
@wasimrehman5816
@wasimrehman5816 7 лет назад
Thank you, very helpful and well explained.
@signorellil
@signorellil 7 лет назад
This is very cool!
@vidhuadhihetty4376
@vidhuadhihetty4376 6 лет назад
How did you compute the taylor expansion at 3:04? I can't seem to figure it out.
@mediwise2474
@mediwise2474 Год назад
what about nongeodesics
@scientiaetveritas40
@scientiaetveritas40 Год назад
Great video but at 1:33 it should be f(x) = f(x_0) + 1/2 f "(x_0) (x - x_0) + ....
@vidhuadhihetty4376
@vidhuadhihetty4376 6 лет назад
Could you maybe explain the Taylor series at 3:01. I've been trying to figure it out but I can't. It has me baffled.
@agelosbedini2627
@agelosbedini2627 4 года назад
Me too.
@dox1755
@dox1755 7 лет назад
Why shrek why
@vidhuadhihetty4376
@vidhuadhihetty4376 6 лет назад
I don't see how at 2:51, you simply added the x(lambda) vector into the integral. I get how you got the dlambda but not the x(lambda) vector.
@dXoverdteqprogress
@dXoverdteqprogress 6 лет назад
The metric g_ij depends on x(lambda); I added it in that step for clarity. I guess I should have stated it in the video.
@vidhuadhihetty4376
@vidhuadhihetty4376 6 лет назад
Oh, that makes sense. Thank you.
@AllisinMusic
@AllisinMusic 4 года назад
Why do we partially integrate to isolate chi but then still keep it in the integrand?!
@dXoverdteqprogress
@dXoverdteqprogress 4 года назад
I'm not sure I understand your question. We do integration by parts to turn chi dot into chi, which then allows us to factor it out.
@AllisinMusic
@AllisinMusic 4 года назад
@@dXoverdteqprogress I completed undergrad a couple years ago and apparently the integration in my head got rusty, I had to work it out on paper. I get it now! However, I'm curious why @5:08 we multiply by the inverse metric? thanks!
@dXoverdteqprogress
@dXoverdteqprogress 4 года назад
@@AllisinMusic Hi. We do so because we want to have only y double dot on the left hand side. Multiplying by the invers metric and summing over k gives y^q double dot.
@AllisinMusic
@AllisinMusic 4 года назад
@@dXoverdteqprogress Thanks so much for your quick response and of course these amazing and unique videos as well! Definitely helping prep for grad school! Blessings
@sb-oo8oc
@sb-oo8oc 5 лет назад
লিভারের অবস্থা খুব খারাপ!
@vidhuadhihetty4376
@vidhuadhihetty4376 6 лет назад
Nevermind, I think I got it.
@dXoverdteqprogress
@dXoverdteqprogress 6 лет назад
Excellent. It's one of those things that are really simple once you work it out.
@David-km2ie
@David-km2ie 5 лет назад
Can you explain it to me?
@good4usoul
@good4usoul 4 года назад
@@David-km2ie s(epsilon) = s(0) + epsilon s'(0) If s=sqrt(fgh), then the first derivative of s is D(sqrt(fgh))=[1/2 (fgh)^(-1/2)] (f' g h + f g' h + f g h') Yet I'm curious if I've gone wrong with the factor of 1/2, and whether that will make a difference in the final conclusions of the video.
Далее
Riemann Curvature Tensor
9:01
Просмотров 13 тыс.
Батя всех бургеров на 7000 ккал!
00:55
This is why you're learning differential equations
18:36
Demystifying The Metric Tensor in General Relativity
14:29
Riemann geometry -- covariant derivative
10:09
Просмотров 251 тыс.
Geodesics and Relativity
11:10
Просмотров 240 тыс.
Line Integrals Are Simpler Than You Think
21:02
Просмотров 47 тыс.
AI can't cross this line and we don't know why.
24:07
Просмотров 447 тыс.
The Meaning of the Metric Tensor
19:22
Просмотров 215 тыс.
What are the Christoffel Symbols? | Tensor Intuition
26:01