The GH5 Has Me Thinking, Episode 2: Lens Selection 

Hi Hugh! I'm a new videographer and I have absolutely become obsessed with watching your videos. You are a delight my friend! You have this killer Jeff Goldblum air about you. I've learned so much during my short time on your channel. Thank you for these wonderful and thoughtful videos.

The Architect from The Matrix is real.

OH MY GOD !!! How many years have I waited for a video of this quality. Well the wait is over. Thanks for that Pablo, I mean Hugh. You nailed it

The most elegant and informative review/opinion of GH5 I ever watched. It's like reading a well written book!

Subscribed. Really happy that you are making these videos -- could seriously listen to you talk for hours.

Wow, you are quite the cultured guy. Really enjoyed the video, you earned yourself a new subscriber :)

That's incorrect, body IS is also 5 stops until 50mm (100mm equiv.) - which covers the most used focal length in normal situations -, it's just that DUAL IS can keep the 5-stops for a much longer focal length, 140mm with native glass. Sure, DUAL IS should probably be better than just body IS, but still, it's not just 3 stops like stated in the video. I'm not sure where did you get info, I got mine from the Panasonic GH5 private presentation that was leaked during CES. So the only difference is when you need longer tele, then to keep 5 stops you will need DUAL IS' otherwise you should get 5 stops even without any OIS lens. Also, 100Mbps IPB is more compressed than the 400Mbps All-I, so in theory it should be LESS tasking on yourself computer and not the other way around like you said. The bitrate doesn't mean it needs more computer power, ProRes HQ can be about 960Mbps and it's much smoother to edit than the 100Mbps H.264. IPB means more calculations than All-I, so if your computer can handle the 100Mbps file, it should do just as well if not better with the All-I 400Mbps. BTW, 10-bit 422 will not be a factor at all. You don't need a dual handle gimbal to deal with the GH5 + Sigma 18-35mm, Zhiyun Crane handles well up to 1600g - even up to 1800g - according to Zhiyun, plus there is also the Pilotfly H2, which is a one handle gimbal up to 2kg.

And here I was thinking about the amazing skintone and sharpness of your video and that it couldn't possibly be a Panasonic with all the people complaining about the pana colors and yada yada until you hit with the gx85 hammer. Plot twist!

GX85 and the G80/85 are both amazing. Love them both.

You are somehow mesmerizing yet clarifying in an arena filled with way too many changing variables for me to master. Love your pacing, thoughtfulness, humility and timing. Especially enjoyed the punchline of this video using the GX85, which I got as my B roll camera for my GH4. Glad to have found you and look forward to more.

I think the problem with all of this speculative thinking based on nothing but "specs' is that, for me, at least, specs don't tell the entire story. Two years ago I bought a Canon c-100mk2. Even brand new, according to the specs, it was already obsolete. AVCHD codec? Consumer crap. 24mbps (for 24p) - ya gotta be kidding. 8 bit 4:2:0. Garbage. Why in the world, knowing what I did, would I buy it - and at $5500? Well, there were a couple of compelling reasons. One was the build quality and ergonomics. But that wouldn't matter by itself. The main reason was the image quality. I mean, geez, it's just gorgeous. And with the same sensor as the 300 and 500, I guess it damn well should be. But what to do about the codec and color space and on and on? Well - I bought an inexpensive ninja star - so suddenly I'm shooting in ProRes 422 (still 8 bit). But a big improvement for very little outlay and it pretty much turned my camera into a C300 for much less money. But here's the thing, even without the Ninja - if I light properly and expose properly - if I do my job as a camera operator/cinematographer up front - then I won't be one of those who complains about how the image breaks up in post because of the crappy codec and color space, etc. I've used this camera professionally on countless shoots. It's great for run and gun as well as narrative shorts where the environment is more controlled. It does everything I've needed it to do -is a pleasure to use - and delivers beautiful results. If I dismissed it because of its specs, without having actually tested it, I would have been the poorer for it. I think what makes us good at what we do is understanding the characteristics - or you could call it the limitations - of the camera - and learn how to get the best from it. Because there will always be the next great thing just around the corner. I have an a6300 - so believe me, I know that feeling. So, you could pre-order the GH5. Or, you could wait a few months for the alleged a7Smk3. In the meantime, I'm just going to keep attempting to get better with what I have. I wonder if Ansel Adams complained about dragging around that camera - low points for portability, no auto focus... and hey, thanks for the video. I think it's nothing short of amazing that I can sit here and watch a half hour of a guy just talking about a product that doesn't yet have in his hand. The side benefit of your videos is that you may actually be lengthening our attention spans. And on youtube! Talk about counter-intuitive!

i could listen to you talk all day

Dude... is almost a one shot clip. What-on-earth? Your way to comunicate... just freaking loved it. FIrst video of yours that I've seen. Definitely will come back for more and check the previous videos.

Once again you have captivated the audience with your incredible presence. Your well-informed presentations are so powerful. This inspires me to achieve greatness. The reveal at the closure was so unexpected and so tongue in cheek.....! Thank you.

I have the 42.5mm f1.2 and it's my gorgeous lens and it's brilliant. I agree.

Okay, now I'm into this. Your first GH5 video raised an eyebrow. By the end of this one, I was engrossed. Wait... how the hell did you get me watch a 30 minute RU-vid video??? I didn't think that was possible. Anyway, I'm enjoying the series enough to subscribe. BTW: I'm here cause I made the decision to preorder the GH5 upgrading from the GH4. I wanted improved ISO noise, better results with the VLog-L codec... but IBIS and autofocus capabilities got my money. I currently use a Ronin-M, GH4, with either the Tokina 11-16 or the HEAVY Sigma 18-35 (I know, I know) with mixed results. Take #5, Take #6... until we get it in focus. IBIS and autofocus should greatly impact the way I shoot. If the GH5 checks out, I might be able to get away with a smaller LIGHTER handheld stabilizer and sell the Ronin-M and replacing it with a Panasonic 4/3 dual IS glass you mentioned. Just wanted to chime in and tell you how much YOU have me thinking about the GH5, also. Thanks. Looking forward to more videos.

You're like psychologist to me about gear, life and stuff like that. Thanks :)

When your old enough to know you can have anything but not everything ... that's when you have to make those thoughtful and very tough choices🤔

You're very charismatic and dignified! Can watch you for hours.

Recently, I purchased a GH5 and have been contemplating which lens(es) to purchase. This is FAR AND AWAY the most informative, comprehensive video that I’ve seen to date regarding these decisions-and it was released three years ago! Thank you for sharing your wisdom and experience with all of us, and best of luck to you moving forward with your future endeavors! I look forward to viewing your other videos.

I was trying to figure out why the skin tones looked different, yet I didn't think you were using a different camera. The comments spoiled that it was a gx85. Great thoughts in this video. Thanks for sharing.

Veydra 12mm, 16mm, 19mm, 25mm, 35mm, 50mm, 85mm is the ideal lens for the cine side. In all honesty unless you're willing to give up true, manual, geared focusing, you're not going to really get in lens IS. Get a quality EVF for focusing accuracy. AF while improving still looks mechanical to me. I'm getting Panasonic lenses for weather sealing not for IS. If the priority is image quality Veydra is the target, imo.

Getting the gear you want is really though if you don't have the budget. For example: I really want the Sony a6500. Technically I can afford that camera (That's $1400). But the reallity is much more different (and difficult). Because what happens after I buy the camera? Well, I need lenses. I can't afford the expensive Sony autofocus lenses so I go to the next best thing. Fast Samyang primes. The 12mm f/2 CS ($350) and 50mm f/1.2 CS ($440) but I also need a fast autofocus standard lens. I chose the Sony FE 28mm f/2 ($420). That's $2600. What about audio? I need a mic. Rode VideoMic Pro ($220). What about lighting? I Probably need 200-500$ for some lighting equipment. Let's say I got all that. And I shot my footage. I then import it. Holly crap what's happening? My computer can't even handle 4K editing. So I'll also need a new PC for editing (about $1000). Add it all up and the price skyrockets to $4400. But wait I found myself in a situations that I'll need a telephoto lens do shoot something specific. Oh, man... So after all that I said well screw it. Let's put aside that camera and get something that I can afford that will also leave me some money for traveling and other stuff. After much... much... searching I found the incredible Panasonic FZ300. That cost $500 and does absolutely everything that I need. It's an incredible little camera actually. It's not the best in low light of course but I could work around it. Or buy additional lights that I can now afford. So when you're buying a new ILC (interchangeable lens camera). You're not just buying a new camera, but you're buying into an ecosystem of lots of different components. So, I would say, you need to choose carefully what you're getting into. Until you can afford the gear that you want. But not necessarily need.

It's been pointed out already, but I just have comment on the Goldblum likeness as well, I love it! Though I must say, what captured me and caused me to subscribe was the thoroughness, contemplation and insightfulness that this video contained. It doesn't hurt that your voice makes a 30 min talking head vid a breeze to watch through!

If you're all about clinical sharpness, best in class image stabilization and such, Olympus PRO lenses with the E-M1 Mark II seems the more obvious way to go? That said, of course you can't deny the GH5's video capabilities in a similar body but sports that fullsize HDMI port, supports UHS-II for both slots and offers the much improved EVF. Regarding lenses with a mount native to the system. The Sigma 30mm f/1.4 DC DN is a great affordable lens, but yeah it's outside of the Panasonic scope. With the 30mm f/2.8 Macro and 42.5mm f/1.7 they've introduced the first affordable non-Leica primes with OIS. And they really keep up. If you want to go Leica... the early models I felt had too much of a Lumix vibe. The newer ones look stellar and gotta love the addition of an aperture ring on the primes. The most affordable one is the 15mm f/1.7 and it sure is quite the value! Because it and the 12mm f/1.4 are fairly wide, they've opted to leave out OIS however. The 42.5mm f/1.2 has it, but together with the 12mm, they're well north of a 1000 bucks. In the end, there never is the ultimate camera or the ultimate lens that suits everyone. But you could get pretty close to perfection for your personal needs... but you probably have to cross a couple of things of your list, be it price... manufacturer, features such as image stabilization... Super excited myself for the GH5. It and the E-M1 Mark II really stepped it up. Panasonic and Olympus have made some incredible bodies there with awesome features. And... it's reliable with hardly any quirks or downsides. I was so excited when Sony announced the A6300, looked great on paper. And I could live without a frontfacing touchscreen, but I just can't have reliability and aesthetics adversely affected. Overheat protection kicking in. That nauseating rolling shutter. Colors that require quite a bit of touch-up in post if you leave things on default settings (that also cause color channel clipping). There's hardly any lenses native to the sensor size. They refuse to evolve the A6x00 into a more robust camera because 'people want small cameras' so they say. Well... what is the use of a compact system, if you'll be using FF E-mount lenses on it? Do you just regard it as an entry camera for people who can't afford a FF camera yet? Apart from the crazy expensive Sony E PZ 18-110mm (more likely to be paired with e.g. a FS5) there hasn't been any APS-C E-mount lenses released by Sony for like 3 years. I don't know. The A6500 didn't really step up the game. The touchscreen implementation is pretty marginal and you can now raise the overheat protection threshold, but doing so it gets uncomfortably hot, so you need to mount it on a tripod. I just can't be on board with stuff like that. Listen, I don't need a DSLR. I get it, they're robust, you can throw 'em around, dip 'em in ice, set 'em on fire. They have nice and accurate autofocus systems, you can be a bokehwhore and go crazy for that fullframe shallow depth of field look. Sure, that's all true. But... 1. I'd rather have a smaller camera (see: Sony A7-range) 2. I really don't appreciate optical viewfinders and mirrors, I have the D5300 and using it in liveview is a pain for taking stills, it's like a pinball machine, it clacks the mirror around like three times when taking a shot, it's slow and irritating, also I just prefer liveview because what you see is what you get and you have all the exposure and focus overlays and aids ... also 3. FF 35mm sensor means glass that covers it! That means you're runnning around with big chunks of glass and probably expensive ones at that. Nah. No need for fullframe. If I go with APS-C mirrorless, I still have the option to use a focal reducer of some sorts and get towards fullframe quite easily. Yet, I would have the option as well to use native lenses that are much more compact (well, in case of Sony, perhaps not as much). Really think Samsung created a stunning camera with the NX1, too bad it's not really going anywhere from here. I won't even bother to mention EOS-M, because they still haven't figured out what a mirrorless system is all about. It's just the same old shizzle in a different jacket. That's just what they do. Currently I can only get excited about the APS-C Mirrorless camera that is the Fujifilm X-T2. Just a great reliable camera and such a nice own system lens line-up. They just don't use lens stabilization as much as other systems and they don't believe in sensor stabilization. The mount itself also sees less support for it than let's say E-mount or MFT. The screen doesn't face forwards and is not touchsensitive. Overall, it's close, but no cigar. Considering everything, for me, Micro Four Thirds has the best system here. Great bodies, great choice of bodies, tremendous value, a plethora of lenses to choose from. Compact! What's not to love? Well... the smaller sensor does mean less quantity hence quality of light, so compared to APS-C or FF you do notice it's quite a bit worse at higher ISO sensitivities... also dynamic range, color accuracy etc just falls a little short. Here is where it comes down to... what are the needs, what are the wants and what can you make work? Well, that's different for everybody, but I can take a hit in sensor performance and stay within the limitations of the system to make it work nontheless and then get tremendous value and reliability. Not to mention compactness when out and about. Until someone (Nikon?) comes up with an APS-C mirrorless camera that's a winner, I'm staying in the MFT corner.

Great stuff. The camera loves you. You are very informative and entertaining. I can't wait until the next episode.

As you promised, and it was terrific! Can't wait for Episode 3. I was tempted the entire video to ask what you were shooting with, so I'm so glad you covered it at the end. BTW ... have you decided if you're going to actually buy a GH5 yet? I would love to see a "season 2" to that effect with the after-hands-on thoughts...

Beautifully presented video Hugh, thank you. I always draw parallels between photography and painting in my own YT vids, and mentioned Guernica in my last one, (mind you, that was on Death in Photography), but bravo to your breadth of learning and eloquence, always a pleasure.

but the big question you haven't answered is whether the gx85 you filmed this episode with is as good as your Sony gear. compare the pros and cons and then decide if the price difference of upgrading to the gh5 is worth it to you. don't expect it to do everything... prioritize what's important to you.

Hugh, I think you pretty much described the entire conversation I've had with myself ever since the GH5 was announced! Albeit, way more eloquent. I usually hear a lot more swear words in my head with so many of the conversations ending in "Fuck it!" I just got the Panasonic G85. I plan to test it thoroughly for use as a video rig and see how it tickles my fancy. To be perfectly honest, if it weren't for the flip out and touch screen and the massively superior phone app that Panny has, I probably wouldn't even be looking at!

This is the best looking video you have on your channel. The skin tones were reproduced nicely from this camera.

Stops? 4:10 i think IS its about axis with dual IS you get 5 axis of stabilization, using inbody only you get 3 axis. Correct me if im wrong but image stabilization has nothing to do with the F-stop you shoot on. Regards.

You are a phenomenal presenter, well done. I could listen all day. I sold my GH4's and have a GH5 on pre order. I have A7S2, A6300 and A6500 with all the main lenses for each system, but held on to all my Olympus, Voightlander and Panasonic glass for MFT because I just can't let go. The GH4 was an awesome camera, and was a better shooting experience than any of my Sony's (though I am enjoying the A6500). I look forward to the GH5. It's OK, if funds permit, to have two systems and use the one that works for what you are shooting. I shoot mainly video by the way. I use my Nikon D750 when I am shooting mainly stills.

The hype is building!

OMG, I think the YT Universe has discovered you... I still maintain we may be twins separated at birth. My wife complains constantly that I rub my forehead exactly the way you do when you have "head strain". I do love hearing someone else talk to themself about the same things I do. Cheers.

Interesting points and I am glad I found your channel for the way you present your videos and thoughts! I have been wanting a GH5 and had similar questions. I currently own and use a GH4 and use it to make wildlife videos, but I want to take making videos much more seriously and have spent time learning techniques and tips that will allow me to do this, and when I get the GH5, I want to start making high quality videos with it. I currently have 4 lenses I use with my GH4. A Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8, Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 II, Panasonic 30mm f/2.8 Macro and the Panasonic 100-300mm. After using them for over a year and understanding how to make videos, I now want the same as you when it comes to lenses. Low chromatic aberrations, low distortions, high sharpness and fast auto focus. Image stabilisation is a plus too, but if the GH5 could give good enough body stabilisation, I'd make an exception or two. Like you, I also prefer fast auto focus, but Panasonic mirrorless cameras are not known for their fast focusing in video as they use contrast AF for focusing, which isn't as good as Sony's Phase Detect or Canons Dual Pixel AF system. Panasonic are claiming the auto focus of the GH5 will blow some people away on how good it is, but given its still contrast based, I will reserve judgement for now, still should be somewhat better than the GH4 auto focus for video. From using the Panasonic 12-35mm f/2.8 lens, I did find it sharp, but it suffers from chromatic aberrations which means I don't use it as often as I'd like since its currently the widest angle lens I own. I am now contemplating getting the GH5 with the Leica 12-60mm to use instead if it is sharp and has low aberrations, if I can afford it. The Panasonic 20mm f/1.7 I find sharp from corner to corner and has low chromatic aberrations, but its auto focus is slower than the 12-35mm and its not as wide as I'd like. There is no stabilisation but for such a small lens, I have not found this to be an issue as I have rarely had issues with shake, even shooting in windy locations where shaking can be a real issue so with the IBIS of the GH5, even though I wouldn't get dual IS, should be good enough. My current Panasonic 30mm macro is sharp and focuses well and doesn't seem to have much chromatic aberrations, but its very short and want a new one as I really want to make a lot of wild plant and insect videos with the GH5 and this lens is too short for most of that, so I was thinking of maybe getting the Olympus 60mm macro as it has twice as long focal length and produces sharp images, but it has no stabilisation but with the IBIS on the GH5, that should hopefully be enough to get a stable image with it as I always plan to use it with a tripod. Lastly the Panasonic 100-300mm isn't a lens I like, but because at the time it was the longest native zoom lens with stabilisation that I could afford, I went for it. Its not very sharp, slow auto focus and suffers noticeable chromatic aberrations, which like you, really bug me. I really want a better lens for wildlife in the future. I did think about the Leica 100-400mm but it costs quite a lot and has a dark f/6.3 aperture at 400mm which I think might be past the sharpest narrow aperture of the GH5 before diffraction kicks in. I hope the new 100-300mm II lens is better in sharpness and chromatic aberrations, but without the crop in 4K like the GH4 has, I find the 100-300mm might be a bit too short for getting videos of some wildlife, like birds.

Still appreciate the professor-esque approach compared to a lot of other lectures out there.

hugh-thank you for sharing ALL of your thoughts on the topic ;-) i had a hunch that the a6300 was not this vid's recording tool since the framing was just a wee bit different than usual and the shot was just a wee bit tighter than usual. to my web-compressed eyes, you looked sharp, the background was nicely soft and the spiel was most appreciated. my only question: did you shoot the sigma wide open at f1.4 or were you at f2 or even f2.8? again, thanks for sharing and BIG thumbs up. be well.

I feel the GH5 oddly enough can be used as a specialty camera and does not need to replace your whole Sony lineup. We are at a stage that is best to use each camera at its strengths. In somethings, nothing can touch Sony, in others Canon, and in others Panasonic. My two cents.

needs vs wants...unfortunately, wants have more wins (defended by marketing) on most people...or it's just me.

So glad I found your channel. Witty & educational. I used to shoot on a hacked GH2 & preordered the GH5 (currently have an A7s). And man I love those Voigts for MFT, even though they're not stabilized. Thx for sharing your journey! :)

regarding DXOmark nocticron testing. I own the lumix noc 42.5mm f1.2 and i also own the Sigma 50mm f1.4 art lens. And i have done a great deal of testing on both, and they are VERY similar in both sharpness and OOFA..... yet DXOmark put the sharpness of the nocticron way lower (regardless on what camera you put it on) than the sigma... i would put them both on exactly the same shelf in terms of sharpness, contrast and quality.

These videos are awesome! You're a very eloquent speaker compared to a lot of other RU-vidrs. I'm definitely on the same page as far as not being terribly impressed by many micro 4/3 lenses. Not a fan of fly-by-wire and all of the decent mechanical focus lenses seem a bit too pricy when considering what their super 35 equivalents are. In my experience, EF lenses are still the best value for the money so I've mostly just used a speed booster to get sort of the best of both worlds (Panasonic camera, Canon lenses). It also helps negate the drawbacks typically associated with the sensor size. Shallow depth of field and low-light are more easily attainable. However, I shoot almost exclusively video. So the only time I care to use autofocus is for gimbals or any rare situations where I'm not able to control focus. If I were a hybrid shooter like you, the choice would be a bit more tricky as autofocus tends to be more essential with photography. But for video, there's no contest in my mind between the GH4/GH5 and anything offered by Canon or Sony at a similar price.

Interesting video in terms of content... and superb in terms of image quality. I like that this video has a warmer look than the previous ones. Did you just used a different white balance or also a new lighting setup? Awesome work!

" no do overs when you travel" ...Im stealing this from you ..Good one

Doylestown here. Rented a GX8 and don't see any reason to spend another $1000 for the GH5. Tell me why I should! The GX85 isn't in the same ballpark.

I'm ready for Round 3 of - GH5 has me thinking! (Great channel!)

Have you considered adding into your comparison using the Speedbooster XL to regain a lot larger sensor size (equivalent)? It is also supposed to give you better low light performance (a full stop better) and shallower depth of field.

You know what I think about this video? I will tell you, but first let me start with the story of synchronized swimming. The first recorded competition of synchronized swimming was in 1891, in Berlin, Germany. Back then it was known as "water ballet"... Ahah, just kiddin'. This was fun to watch. :)

Have you tried or considered the cineform codec for editing? Yeah it takes time to transcode and creates absolutely gigantic file sizes, but because it's gpu accelerated it takes a huge load off the cpu and makes handling more power hungry footage a lot easier. It was mind blowing the first time I tried it. So if you have the time and the storage I would try it out.

Finally and articulate and credible discussion. In a sea of crappy videos, this is a refreshing 1st class presentation.

You are good at what you do. Thanks for the inspiration, provocation, and excellent guidance. Dave

Hugh Brownstone channeling Steve Jobs? :) Thought provoking as always, good stuff sir. Panasonic, Olympus, Sony, Canon, etc. all producing great gear, good times for amateurs and professionals alike. Keep up the good work, love the turtleneck :) Cheers.

You're like the serious version of Casey (Camera Conspiracies) hehe. Discovered you thanks to him. Great content, and very good points! One more subscriber!

I think you'll find that in practice if you use Olympus lenses on the GH5 (stills) that you'll be pleased with the results, and you speculation will be unfounded. I use a panapoly of Olympus lenses with the GX8, and the IBIS is fab. All of the Olly Pros have clutch focus rings, which allow you to switch from fly-by-wire to repeatable focus with hard stops.

I'm very excited to see the video performance when the camera is released compared to the GH4. I think one of the features that I am most excited about is the automatic rack focus!

This Looks Amazing.... Can you share the lighting setup you did in this video.... its beautiful

Am enjoying a lot your videos because now i know is not only me who suffer his way trough that kind of decisions XD Best regards HB!

Terrific video. The wit and information contained herein is more than worth the length of time required to get this through this video. Thanks!

literally was saying the same thing in my head... 'what the heck is this?' lol when I saw the second painting. Go with the 'pro' line Olympus lenses, the f/2.8 and higher Panasonic lenses, and the manual focusing mitakon lenses. In body isn't an end all be all, so I totally get using Panny lenses would help you IS/IBS wise [Panny calls theirs 'In Body Stabilizer]. Now as far as not making compromises on focus... that's something I've always had to do with Panasonic even owning lenses like their Leica 15 + 25mm lenses. And those lenses look 'really' digital in video. Owning again both Sony and Panasonic equipment, if you want native lenses then just get a few of the 'pro' lenses and look at some Olympus lenses. Sell some older Sony stuff you don't use, and get that Panny 12-35 f/2.8 II for the Dual IS. Otherwise I would n't look at just the price. You really should look at workflow, usability, accessories, and the overall other abilities in the Panasonic ecosystem vs Sony. Because honestly I feel if you aren't going to take advantage of all the 'obscure' high selling points you may not use daily, then I would argue getting the GH5 and buying into the Panny line is a good idea. I'd honestly stick with Sony, rent a GH5, and see if it's anything you'll be interested in. The ONLY reasons I am all for it over my GH4, is because I can get 10bit in body, don't have to lug around an external monitor/recorder, have an A/B cam that can ALSO do 10bit 4:2:2 and, the ability to adapt glass from diff manufacturers including anamorphic lenses. Everything else for me is 'icing on the cake' especially some of the photo stuff. But honestly, you might be better sticking with Sony for now Hugh... and renting the GH5 when it comes out... BTW, here is the ONLY way to remove CA in video that I found looks great and works…library.creativecow.net/articles/larsen_carl/removing_chromatic_aberration/video-tutorial

Ha Ha.. I knew there was something I liked about you. I am a Temple Alum and grew up in South Philadelphia. Living in Los Angeles.

What camera and lens do you use to make your videos ?? Like the one we are watching now.

The one thing that keeps me from switching to a Panasonic body is that you have to use Panasonic lenses to get the most out of them. Yes, you can use Olympus lenses (which I have), but then you don't get DFD autofocus. My OM-D E-M1 might not have the video chops of the GH5, but it has phase detect autofocus, which aids AF tracking with my Oly 40-150mm f2.8 PRO and my Oly 75-300mm II. I can put Panasonic lenses on my Oly body and still use the phase detect AF points, but not vice versa. I'm a photographer first, particularly for wildlife, and I'm just starting to dabble in video. My OM-D E-M1 is good enough for my modest video needs at 1080p / 30, and the OM-D E-M1 Mark II would be even better.

Hey Hugh, great video as always. But there is one bit that I found somewhat confusing. At 19:48 you sum up that having just two lenses at (full-frame) focal lengths 85mm and 150mm would work for you. I find that odd, as shooting indoors in any sort of small space makes even an 85mm a challenge to shoot. Did I miss something? Care to elaborate? Thanks!

Lenses are/is the other big reason why I use a Panasonic G85 and leave my a7rii at home. The Sony lenses are too heavy for me.

You know I ask this all the time, Hugh: "What was this video shot on and what is the audio solution"? I am guessing you used a Sony 6500? Opps - my bad - wrote this Before the end of the video... LOOKS GREAT - still.... sound solution?

I'm loving this process and your journey :) I'm a long-time Canon user, but last year picked up a G7 as I wanted a very light body / lens combo capable of narrow DOF. Long story short, I fell in love with it and am currently thinking of jumping into MFT with both feet and even selling all my Canon kit for a GH5 when it's available. Your video and rationalisation is *absolutely* helping me make a similar decision :)

I really like how deep you dig into things - I like to over analyze things too, but ultimately, I'm happy with my decision most of the time - it can pay off

What do you think of the Voigtlander Nokton 42.5 f0.95? It’s a manual lens but it looks to be very well built. I’m very curious to hear what you have to say about it. Thanks!

Thank you for expressing your own thoughts about the GH5. I have exactly the same questions. Keep up the good work !

I love how you pulled me along on that discussion and all the while I'm. Thinking wow that must be an expensive setup He's using right now look how crisp how Sharp and it ends Up being the budget setup after all! Excellent video and information my friend.

I really enjoy your thoughts and the way you present them, well done! Any thoughts on the panasonic Leica 12mm 1.4?

Great video, can leave you more confused than before possibly. Yes, the 400Mbit 4K will leave iMacs behind probably, so we would have to use proxys I suppose. The 4K 60fps without that much of a significant image loss is very exciting as well about this camera though. GH4 offers a "Full HD" 60fps which looks a lot worse than even the Full HD 24fps and 4K and this are like night and day of course. Another thing about choosing a camera now is that there might be new Alpha 7Sses coming out this year. Anyways, great video, so subscribed!

As someone that has owned the gh4 the nocticron 42.5mm f1.2 since release and also has a XL speed booster, and most of the decent Canon lenses (that I need) I think you should just forget autofocus and enjoy your canon lenses on the gh5 with a booster. Faster, and with satisfying manual focus. Then get something else for photography with AF. I love my gh4. But as good as the the AF is for a m43. It won't compete with a phase detect AF I know this means more gear, but having a cam for stills and a cam for video will give you the best of both. Something like an 80d for stills. Keep your canon lenses. Gh5 for video. Speedbooster. Done.

Actually, I am working on a film now using a mix of just about every fast Lumix / Leica lens there is. But, also through the Metabones adaptor and a Canon 135 f/2 on the GX85 and GH5 and both were remarkably steady for long video holds, and sooo beautiful for portrait style closeups. IMO, IBIS is the best thing to find it's way into a camera in years, but yes Dual stabilization is even further enhanced. Love the Picasso scenario. Having lived through film, and every iteration of digital up until now, I'm at the point where art and technology collide. Enough tech to know what really matters, and a lot of heart to put it to good use. Great stuff, keep it up.

Thank you for loveley 30 minutes. Suscribed!

Panasonic G85? Hmmm... and what about the Panasonic 42.5mm f/1.8? For web delivery, as you mention, do you think there would be a difference to the GH5 w/ f/1.2 42.2mm Nocticron? Really? Perhaps enough is as good as a feast. $2400 price difference buys a lot of airline tickets, as you pointed out.

I know this video is a few months old, but the coming Crane 2 (not v.2 mind you!) claims total load capability of 3.2kg. So larger lenses might be more useful now.

It's inexcusable that the Nocticron isn't weather sealed at that price.

Excellent video! And the fact that it was shot on the G85!,...AWESOME!. Hats off to you sir !

Put a smile on my face, waiting for part 3. P.S there are a few plugins for fcpx that fix chromatic aberration, i have never tried them personally but their stills counterparts work great from my experience.

This is the first video of yours I've seen. I like that you're a smaller channel and you are extremely well spoken and have a very soothing voice. Haha. I look forward to watching more. Have a good day.

So, with the GX85 lacking a mic jack, did you just send the audio to an external recorder and sync up in post? I see you shot with the Sigma 30mm f1.4. I have the Panasonic 25mm f1.4, which is also a stellar lens. Definitely worth considering. This video has a lovely aesthetic to it even at 1080p (I don't have a 4K monitor or TV so I can't comment on that) that I haven't seen from a lot of vloggers. Your perfectionism has definitely paid off.

Hugh, love your blog and insights, just want to point out that the light gathering of the f stops on m43 is a true measure and down converting of f stops compared to FF is only in terms of perceived depth of field. an f1.2 m43 lens gathers just as much light as a FF f1.2 lens, but bokeh will be bigger on the FF camera. This is a common misconception and is something that is misrepresented all the time. Also, when dealing with 85mm and equivalents, or even longer focal lengths like the mentioned f4 300mm from olympus, perceived DOF matters little as DOF separation becomes easier and easier to obtain

Hey Hugh, again an awesome episode. I'm sticking with you since the first one, because the GH5 is very high on my priority list in 2017. I'm curious about the wide angle topic on MFT cameras/lenses. Does it bother you to have a crop factor of two? The GH5 would be my first MFT camera, until today I shot much everything from my own 60D (APS-C) to 5D Mk 2 and 3, Sony A7s (II) and some of the BlackMagic Cameras and wide angle was always something that was simply usable. In March I will be visiting the United States. A small tour in three weeks from Washington over Philly to New York. As a german filmmaker it would be awesome to meet up with you and do some tech talk. Greetings from Germany! :)

That second painting is the faces of everyone in a rush to buy the gh5 and don't know wheater to buy it with the kit lens 12 60 2.8 because it don't have a constant aperture. And ya I mean me lol

The voigtlander 10.5mm f/0.95 is really making me itch. I really want to go buy that lens.

I am having the same conversations with myself in choosing a new system. The a6500 has a great sensor and AF, but no fast lenses for subject isolation. Where are the 60, 70, and 90mm 1.2 lenses? The GH5 has a great feature set, but base ISO is 200, how about 50? Phase detect. I suppose we should be grateful that we have so many options and can only complain about the last 1% away from perfection. Looking forward to Part 3.

You should have many more subscribers. Love your work.

I got the GH5 two weeks ago! I cannot believe I was waiting so long. Really amazing camera.

Just picked up the 42.5mm Nocticron for my GH5. Check check check check!

Hello again, so i wanted to get your input as to the best first lens would be for the GH5 to shoot cinematic video ? Here are my options, Panasonic 25mm 1.4 Panasonic 15mm 1.7 Panasonic 12mm 1.4 Panasonic 42 .5= 85mm 1.7 olympus 50 macro 17 1.8 75 1.8

I absolutely love all your videos. I am about to buy two new GH5 and I spent 6 days watching every review on youtube, and about every lens people use. Your videos were by far the best and most insightful and I'd like to say thank you for that.

Just do this: GH5 + 12-35mm F2.8 OIS + Panasonic lens firmware upgrade H-H12035 Ver 1.3 (2) H-HS35100 Ver 1.3 I would be inclined to mount 12-35 first because it's all you ever use for discrete filmmaking. Cheers.

I'm new to your channel and I love all your awesome videos! Very informative and quality is amazing! I do have a question about what lenses you like for your Panasonic camera and if there is any lens coming out that you looking to buy or recommend? I'm looking to make some travel videos and having difficulty deciding what lenses to buy for GH5. Thanks for answering and keep up the hard work to make all these fantastic masterpieces for us to watch! Cheers!

A million thanks for sharing so generously and deliciously your knowledge, your concerns and your own experience. They are a balm for mortals like me with their doubts and insecurities. User for many years of Sony, I have gone through FS100, Alpha 7s, FS7 and now with the 6300 and the Z150. Different cameras for different jobs. And there appears a small beast like the GH5 and everything seems to take a new dimension. A step beyond in quality, ergonomics and simplicity. But, what about small sensor and lenses. I am willing to sacrifice some things but there is something (apart from the depth of field and noise) that we must take care in reference to the character of the image, because for the same frame (in middle-general planes) we must use more wider lenses and, in some cases, that may mean not only a change of look but, especially at short distances of the subject, a non esthetic "deformation". This, for me is surely the biggest brake to this "step back size" ... Thanks so much Hugh

I need an asprin after that delivery! Very good thoughts on all levels, and for your needs, I think this is definitely THE camera! There's one BIG issue I have with Panasonic cameras, and that is it's razor sharp image, I mean, if you look at it too long, you're eyes will start bleeding, and there really isn't any way of taming that in post, that I've every liked. On the other hand, Panasonic makes THE most reliable cameras on the market...period. My eye is on this little Fuji X-T20, I just love the image off that sensor, and the film sims are an added bonus!

Sir, I've been doing some research post seeing your video. You have recommended the "LEICA DG NOCTICRON 42.5mm F1.2" for GH5. I am an aspiring film maker and wondering if you could point me in the right direction. While the 4.2mm is a great lens, is it the best out there for film makers to achieve "that" film look or should I settle down with a Rokinon Cine lens? Please advise at your convenience.

Couldn't make it past 2 minutes. Got my GH5 to unbox and actually go shoot something. Getting some good numbers on RU-vid though!

Love my Panasonic Lumix GX8......Great camera...great 4K