Тёмный

The Great Math Mystery (2015) FULL SPECIAL | NOVA | PBS America 

PBS America
Подписаться 229 тыс.
Просмотров 249 тыс.
50% 1

Explore math's astonishing power across the centuries. Join astrophysicist and writer Mario Livio to follow math from Pythagoras to Einstein and beyond, all leading to the ultimate riddle: Is math an invention or a discovery?
First Broadcast Date: June 23, 2015
About PBS America:
Welcome to PBS America, a British TV channel from America’s public service broadcaster, PBS, showcasing award-winning American history, science, current affairs, plus arts and culture shows alongside the works of living legend Ken Burns, output is all hand-picked by a British team.
Get More PBS America:
Website: www.pbsamerica...
Twitter: / pbsamerica
Facebook: / pbsamerica
Instagram: / pbsintheuk

Опубликовано:

 

2 окт 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 212   
@brianmitch
@brianmitch 2 месяца назад
I stopped watching traditional Televison and now you tube is my permanent home thanks to productions like these
@alanyates5088
@alanyates5088 2 месяца назад
Me too. I also watch and listen in bed and sometimes go to sleep but carry on listening, and occasionally I imagine/dream that I am present in the discussions, and even try to participate but get very irritated because everyone seems to ignore me!
@jim23mac
@jim23mac 2 месяца назад
This wasn't made for RU-vid it was made for cable TV in the U.S. and franchised to channels all over the World
@MCLV1155
@MCLV1155 2 месяца назад
​@jim23mac Yes but you find it here. Turn on TV and what do you get...
@ezekielbeckett5396
@ezekielbeckett5396 Месяц назад
I call it sponging.. soaking up information that sparks your interest.. RU-vid allows you to target what you view.. the box just zombifies you.. feeds you crap.. is trying to caroul the way you think and live.. its for the sheeple.
@endacollins1
@endacollins1 Месяц назад
SAME HERE .
@hafiz468
@hafiz468 3 месяца назад
20:05 Yes, everything in this universe is discovered, not invented. Like when we say Newton’s Laws of Motion, but in reality it is Newton’s DISCOVERED laws of Motion.
@akhil999in
@akhil999in 2 месяца назад
it is not clear why all mathematical knowledge does not get discovered instantly. may be there can be a design of brain that does discover all maths immediately. after all knowledge is not a physical process, and therefore there is no inherent time required, unlike the setting of cement.
@gdiwolverinemale4th
@gdiwolverinemale4th Месяц назад
@@akhil999in What do you mean by saying "knowledge is not a physical process"? What else could it possibly be?
@richardbullen6515
@richardbullen6515 3 месяца назад
Stop the background music it's not necessary and really distracting!
@denelson83
@denelson83 2 месяца назад
"Concepts are invented while relations are discovered." You know, that description of the nature of mathematics makes the most sense to me.
@Silly.Old.Sisyphus
@Silly.Old.Sisyphus Месяц назад
um, er, relations are imagined concepts too!.... it's all in the mind; mathematics is not reality, it is, like Galileo said, a (human) language for talking about the universe. And, like any language, you can use it to talk sense or bulldust. For example, quantum mechanics is a load of crup, even if it sounds plausible if you don't think about it too much...
@jackevans2386
@jackevans2386 3 месяца назад
I am an electronics engineer/software engineer and a musician, and as such, have always been fascinated by the maths associated with analogue and digital audio with geometry and trigonometry.
@PedroFerreira-ze5yp
@PedroFerreira-ze5yp 3 месяца назад
PBS NOVA, it doesn't get any better than this!
@Musichead1968
@Musichead1968 2 месяца назад
**jj*just j**jj*just jjkkkjjk kjķkk(kjk(kjkjkjkkkkkkkjkjkkjjkkjkkjkknjkkkkkkkkj*kjkkkkkkkkkjkkjkk(kjk(k*kjkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk(kjkkk(kjk(kjkk(kj(kjkkkk(kjkj
@sormcmxcix
@sormcmxcix 3 месяца назад
What a gift to the world is PBS NOVA … THANK YOU
@honeybunch5765
@honeybunch5765 3 месяца назад
Imagine all these historical math geniuses being with us today? They would be so in their element.
@numbercruncher6242
@numbercruncher6242 3 месяца назад
Not really. A lot of them were religious zealots and consumed with beliefs which they tried to use Math to show evidence for. Not all, but many of them were foolish that way.
@colindean8261
@colindean8261 3 месяца назад
This was great but WHY oh WHY the irritating music all the way through? It's already interesting enough, you don't have to sugar coat it or "sex it up".
@scarter9447
@scarter9447 3 месяца назад
Math is emergent from the underlying dynamical system. Just like all macro properties and patterns.
@pablocopello3592
@pablocopello3592 3 месяца назад
Math is the creation of "logically rigorous" structures(*) (mathematical theories). Those "logically rigorous structures" are created using our capacity of thinking in a "logically rigorous" way. The "logically rigorous" way of thinking is a kind of "conceptual thinking". What we (humanity) discovered, is that humans using "logically rigorous" thinking will agree (almost always) in the validity (or not) of the "logical structures", and based in the same assumptions (hypothesis) would agree on (and independently reach) the same conclusions. In mathematics, we make "assumptions" (hypothesis for a single theorem, axioms for an entire theory) and then make deductions based on those assumptions. The (initial) assumptions are INVENTED, but what is deduced based on those "assumptions" is DISCOVERED (what we "discover" is that those assumptions logically imply what is deduced). What we (humans) have "discovered" is that if our "assumptions" correspond to reality (empirical facts), what follows from these assumptions in a logically rigorous manner (that is, the mathematical structure we can build based on those assumptions) also corresponds to reality (empirical facts). In that consists the "Unreasonable Effectiveness of Math". So, the math that, given the assumptions, we build based only in our mind (but checked against other human minds), will correspond to reality (if the assumptions correspond), why ?? Because of EVOLUTION, our "logically rigorous" thinking evolved as a "tool" to help us to create mental models of our environment (the "realm" of reality more immediate to our survival), models that help us to better foresee, adapt and manipulate our environment. BUT, our logical thinking evolved to be "effective" in our "environment" (our limited "realm" of reality). It does NOT need to be "effective" for other "realms" of reality very different (alien) from our environment or very complex. For instance, chaotic systems, or consciousness, can be very complex for our capacities. A realm like Quantum Physics begins to be very anti-intuitive, but still within the limits of our logical thinking. Realms beyond Quantum are not guaranteed to be within the reach of our logical thinking. But we have to try, only trying we can know how far we can reach in our knowledge. What is out of the reach of our logical thinking is out of our reach (in terms of knowledge), at least while our logic thinking does not evolve (if it evolves to reach new realms of reality it will probably not be "biological" evolution but maybe AI). (*) A "logically rigorous" structure is a set of well defined statements (with their values of truth) that are logically related thru rigorous demonstrations. A demonstration is a logically rigorous inference (deduction) of the value of truth (True or False) of a statement based in the value of truth of other statements (hypothesis). A well defined mathematical theory has a series of statements assumed to be true (axioms) and a set of statements whose value of truth is inferred (deduced) from the axioms thru demonstrations (usually involving long "chains" of demonstrations). (Demonstrations form part of theorems (a theorem has hypotheses, thesis and a demonstration of the thesis based in the hypotheses).
@gdiwolverinemale4th
@gdiwolverinemale4th Месяц назад
It is much simpler than that. What puzzles us is that our universe is so complex (to us), that it follows very complicated rules and patterns described by Mathematics. But it does. So we look into the mathematical problems and say ... what the hell?
@NewMessage
@NewMessage 2 месяца назад
Someone need to make Pla-to. A modeling clay that come pre-formed in the shapes of Platonic solids.
@Tinker1950
@Tinker1950 25 дней назад
@@NewMessage Idiot level comment.
@GeorgeSmiley77
@GeorgeSmiley77 2 месяца назад
_Is math an invention or a discovery?_ The only reasonable answer is "Both". If it must be one or the other, then the better answer has to be "Discovered". The idea that prime numbers aren't prime UNLESS there are humans present who understand what "prime" means strikes me as ridiculous. Therefore math cannot be simply "invented". In the absence of human sentience, math still exists. Math is (partly) a description of reality. If reality exists, so does math. Only Wrong math can be invented!
@robertroylomax8114
@robertroylomax8114 2 месяца назад
WHERE........does Mathematics come from? The MOST OBVIOUS answer........is........THE RIGHT REVEREND FATHER JEOA is the source of such profound intelligence
@nishikantmishra8467
@nishikantmishra8467 Месяц назад
Who is jeoa?
@nishikantmishra8467
@nishikantmishra8467 Месяц назад
Fibonacci series was mentioned by Indian rishis before 2500 years. They didn’t even mentioned this, there is much more advanced knowledge is stored in indian numerology. They mentioned Pythagoras, he got all his knowledge from further east and those theorems are mentioned in Vedic texts which were written way before Pythagorus. Rishis have answered all the questions mentioned in this documentary, but the human arrogance is stopping them to accept.
@touchofgrey5372
@touchofgrey5372 3 месяца назад
@22:20 that is not exactly a scientific way to see which hand it would take the food from! She practically places her right hand - with the most food - in front of that Lemur's mouth! A professor???
@hermankoopman9468
@hermankoopman9468 Месяц назад
There is logic, math is all around us. We discovered it. Quantum is of a different level. It has to be logic, not ghostly.
@peterobinson3678
@peterobinson3678 3 месяца назад
Really? Nautilus shells are cool, but now I have to be amazed every time i cut open a cabbage? Fuck science. :/ lol
@iambrian769
@iambrian769 2 месяца назад
Not A Maths Personal But Its Significance Is Exciting. Enjoying From The Caribbean 🇻🇨
@afewfairthings
@afewfairthings 11 дней назад
if we do finally discover an improved or novel system of mathematics that can predict everything, is that the final proof that the world is entirely deterministic and free will is an illusion?
@tokajileo5928
@tokajileo5928 3 месяца назад
this video is not new, saw it many years ago
@MohamedArtimA
@MohamedArtimA 21 день назад
Pi is MORE Than dismal rounded circle 💡 Pi *Surrounds *Up *Down * Sides💡 Mc Pi *Brings💡 Pi Type Makes *Mass *Volume💡 ThankYoU@e٦💡
@dipakganguli2027
@dipakganguli2027 10 дней назад
The Pi was discussed, what puzzles me about Pi is its value goes beyond infinite. Its imprecise and yet wherever it appears, the answer comes about as precise and finite. I wish all the physical constants were listed, such as, Avogadro´s number, g the gravitational constant or Plank´s constant - these where do they come from and why are they constant? Its weird and defies all sense of reality. The phenomenon of Orbitals, electrons are a mush of probability and yet they can only jump in precise steps. Are my neurons real or sticky probabilities. Does Math arise from our consciousness rather than just a concept in our brain.
@MohamedArtimA
@MohamedArtimA 21 день назад
Math++ He GodBonded onlY Him what brought down before they made from His Make ManyMany i Warn You DayHeartBreak We1 GodCuTTer OurCreator Will inHerent The 7GalaxyS and earth + whose on iT and Back To Us⚖️✅⚠️☑️ إذ قضي الأمر
@WayOfAges
@WayOfAges 3 дня назад
If everything is “math” then how did mathematicians come into being? We don’t encounter this problem with “physical reality” because to the latter we attribute objective existence, which is ludicrous in the case of the former.
@WayOfAges
@WayOfAges 3 дня назад
I know that birds can count because the defensive maneuver of an Indian walking stick (phasmid) is to make its six legs look like four legs.
@catallaxy
@catallaxy 2 месяца назад
They make so much about Newton's Law of Gravity but, they show us nothing about Newton's opinion that God is the architect of the Universe and mathematics ( geometry + arithmetic ) are His blueprints. Newton wrote much more about God than he did about mathematics.
@anandsengar6602
@anandsengar6602 2 месяца назад
There is no god it's just social conditioning which makes us to feel like that way.
@ioannisantoniadis6719
@ioannisantoniadis6719 Месяц назад
The problem is he wrote some books in perfect Greek part of them theology. His books are translated to Latin. (Latin version) And from Latin to English. So disrespectful for such a scientist.😢 Thanks to God I could read The original.
@garyk1334
@garyk1334 Месяц назад
Not uncommon for someone in his era to also believe in the mystical
@steveyard43
@steveyard43 2 месяца назад
We count following a base 10 system. If we counted by say a base 11 system, is there an analagous Fibronacci series ?
@gdiwolverinemale4th
@gdiwolverinemale4th Месяц назад
No doubt. Try it .... e.g. 5 + 8 = 12 (base 11)
@luisamendes8181
@luisamendes8181 Месяц назад
Human and human minds are part of the universe and reality. It would be very odd if our minds works in a different way the universe does. Unfortunately the video doesn’t conjecture that, talking about minds as outside the world, as usual
@kateknowles8055
@kateknowles8055 2 месяца назад
And He made man in his own image. Male and female created He them. So we CREATE and our CREATOR uses Mathematics also. This is a great mystery. Excellent introduction. Goodness, Truth and Beauty . Good fun too. The mystery of evil is something far, far short of this perfection. ⭕🪧🪡 7.30 You can draw a circle with the radius or diameter equal to the spacing between those parallel lines and equal to the length of this needle. The circle has all these angles, all 360 degrees, and minutes and seconds. The needle can fall at any of those angles onto these lines or between them., so it seems to have quite a lot in common with the circle which you can draw.
@Aluminata
@Aluminata 4 дня назад
Why does maths work so well in nature. If you have 1 apple and + another, you get 2 apples. What am I missing?
@rhodiamann9057
@rhodiamann9057 21 день назад
What about the human spirit or human soul? Are these just mathematics?? Oh, I hope not!!!
@Silly.Old.Sisyphus
@Silly.Old.Sisyphus Месяц назад
Fibonnacci sequence is a sequence of growth, ultimately derived from the basic operation of cell division. 1 turns into 2; then 1+2 = 3 and so on. It's not a mystery.
@VinhNguyen-yi1kk
@VinhNguyen-yi1kk 3 месяца назад
All this recycled footage off other related topics.
@ioannisantoniadis6719
@ioannisantoniadis6719 Месяц назад
π which symbolises periphery (περιφέρεια) of the cirkle equals to 3.14 of it's own diameter. With other words if you know the size of the diameter, you know the π . Example: 1 m. diameter of a circle, will have π periphery 3.14 m. trying tests on different shapes than circle, doesn't make any sense. It's a unique theory. 🤯🥶🤯
@ThermaL-ty7bw
@ThermaL-ty7bw 3 месяца назад
math is invented to describe the world around us , the number 1 has ONE corner , the number 2 has actaul TWO corners , etc ... that's all it is ... Classical Logic - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy , first sentence , math and logic are formal languages the pattern we describe with it didn't have a choice in the matter , the pattern is ... just there , we saw the pattern , we needed a way to describe ... the pattern that 1 corner equals 1 it's a PHYSICAL RELATION between the concept in our head , which is also a pattern , and the pattern we see in reality it's nothing magical or woo woo , it's just a description of reality created by us the ''correspondence part'' ... is just a fluke , you might as well give it AGENCY , like a religious person does with the entire universe , maybe give it a name and a face to go with it ... it's not because it corresponds , that it somehow FITS , WE MADE IT FIT !!! that's the whole point of math and logic BEING A LANGUAGE in the first place and why it's the FIRST sentence in the classical logic department
@mackenziemarceau1055
@mackenziemarceau1055 2 месяца назад
OMG. This program has all the hallmarks of a re-hashing of the 3 parts documentary "Magic Numbers", hosted by mathematician Dr. Hanna Fry, and another documentary on the same subject hosted by physicist Dr. Jim Al-KHalili, all produced by the BBC. The resemblance is uncanny, and disturbing!
@yrrahladiv
@yrrahladiv 18 дней назад
God is a God of order, or else we have nothing to discover which is in order.
@JohnBorstlap
@JohnBorstlap Месяц назад
You feel, in the course of this great video, the reluctance to acknowledge the obvious: human consciousness is part of nature, a product of evolution, and mathematical relationships in nature are thus also part of human consciousness, it is all a holistic continuum. So, math is a discovery of existing relationships in reality - inside and outside of us - but the language of math is a human creation. This reluctance is something typical Western: to see the human mind and the human being as separate from nature.
@eddyhate88
@eddyhate88 Месяц назад
this thing started ok but by the end it's weird. mathematics were not invented by humans per say but we formulated it with our own numbers and measure system. the maths were there we just made up a way to express them so we could understand the relation between quantity, shapes, volume etc... we saw those repeating patterns in nature and found ways to mimic them and use them for our own growth. no matter if you can count or not, when you see in a tree only 1 apple and the other tree beside it has more than one, you've done math without knowing, the numbers are just more precise in measuring exactly how much more is in quantity than just 1. vocalization and visualization, created the needs for precision and we invented words, letters and rules to use them, we've had many many measure system that were less precise than now like imperial compared to metric, but metric is based on the size of earth and although more precise to the scale of the universe it's not useful unless we make some equations to make it fit all together, we still have many discoveries to make to be able to find a universal measuring system that make physics easier to understand and calculate. the fact that we use mathematics to recreate some natural phenomenon prove that mathematics are not a human invention but the symbols we use are
@Kounomura
@Kounomura 3 месяца назад
Every system, event, process, which in terms of its behavior is to some extent consistent, consequent, - i.e., quasi, if the causes are the same, the effect is the same -, has its own internal, innate mathematics. This is also true for random events, but there this rule needs to be formulated more precisely. That mathematics exists et all, proves that the universe is rather consequent. At least we have no reason to assume otherwise. The fact that we create mathematical models proves that we believe in the universe. But we also need to know that the universe has no obligation to reciprocate our trust. The fact that we create mathematical models proves that we trust the consistency of the universe. But we also need to know that the universe has no obligation to reciprocate our trust. The phenomenon's own mathematics must be discovered by us. I think mathematics is given by nature, but we have to discover it. Even the most ingenious, mathematical models are discoveries. The absolute randomness, which has no distribution function, has no mathematics. There is nothing to explore there. The mathematics that we will only discover in the future already exists today, even before. A good question is from when and for how long certain mathematical regularities have existed and to what depth they can be discovered. For example, did the mathematics of the prime numbers exist in the state of the Big Bang? etc. On the other hand, it is thought-provoking, that it's possible to develop beautiful mathematical theories that have nothing to do with the reality, or we do not yet know if they have. I would classify this in the category of works of art, since one can also paint a beautiful picture, even of a landscape does not exist anywhere. Why can't we talk about a branch of art whose subject is a surprisingly witty mathematical theory? It does have an aesthetic value, or even more.
@DejanOfRadic
@DejanOfRadic Месяц назад
Math is like things....things are not like math. People worry about the ghost in the machine.....but the machine in the ghost is just as worrisome a problem.
@John-ni5yt
@John-ni5yt Месяц назад
Human brains think in sequences, comparing things and their properties and amounts. So math wasn't invented or discovered. It's natural
@robynivory3788
@robynivory3788 Месяц назад
@topquark22 Mathematically proving the ratio of positive to negative comments left on this channel.. statistically haha
@haraspa23294
@haraspa23294 Месяц назад
You think you can talk about maths without talking about "INDIAN Mathematicians" than "Goood Luck"
@NewMessage
@NewMessage 2 месяца назад
Well now I want pie.
@tatimoa
@tatimoa 3 месяца назад
That bass player tho khhh
@sunalwaysshinesonTVs
@sunalwaysshinesonTVs 3 месяца назад
I feel the NOVA I watched as a child was far more sophisticated than the NOVA today. I was expecting to gain insight into the question. Instead, I watched a primer on this magical thing that exists called maths as if NOVA wanted to demonstrate there's this thing called maths in reality. What's next? NOVA gonna try to tell us the world is round?
@Bulliont
@Bulliont 2 месяца назад
Entertaining but where’s the MATHS, started ok wit pi but not much else :(
@AdamLaw-f4w
@AdamLaw-f4w 2 месяца назад
I love Pi Apple Pie, Steak Pie, Chicken Pie.....LOL!
@remigio7515
@remigio7515 2 месяца назад
It's phi- pie- phay
@dogwithwigwamz.7320
@dogwithwigwamz.7320 Месяц назад
I stick to my rule, which is `when I`m reading maths and finding it easy I`m doing something wrong !`
@Rick1234567S
@Rick1234567S Месяц назад
Why does it work at all? We live in a simulator. That is a computer. Computers use math.
@bryanrumwell8753
@bryanrumwell8753 2 месяца назад
Oh ya, if you are alls so smart why do we pay for the power that Tesla was going to make free for all?
@alexsmith2526
@alexsmith2526 2 месяца назад
well done
@ioanbota9397
@ioanbota9397 2 месяца назад
Realy I like this video
@franciscook5819
@franciscook5819 2 месяца назад
In Physics, maths is used to model facts discovered by observation or experiment. Any mathematical model is temporarily the most accurate we have, not necessarily the final model (which we may be incapable of discovering). Gravity, for example, went from Newtonian to Einstein's General relativity. Of course mathematical models are, therefore, effective - that's why they were designed. An ineffective model is of little or no use.
@gdiwolverinemale4th
@gdiwolverinemale4th Месяц назад
That is almost completely wrong. Most of the present day physics was inferred purely from mathematics and then confirmed by experiment
@mrtienphysics666
@mrtienphysics666 3 месяца назад
Thanks!
@richtran
@richtran 3 месяца назад
So it's true we do live in a computer simulation.
@bakerkawesa
@bakerkawesa 3 месяца назад
Reality bends to mathematics.
@manmohanmehta5697
@manmohanmehta5697 3 месяца назад
Things moved so fast leading to Relativity theory and long enigma of quantum physics.We the brave new world are unraveling it all
@12thmaths54
@12thmaths54 Месяц назад
We invented Notations and procedures , to discover Maths
@PabloDaVinciEscobar
@PabloDaVinciEscobar 3 месяца назад
Brilliant channel 💯 🙏
@pauls3075
@pauls3075 3 месяца назад
Brilliant in relation to your level of understanding, elementary for a lot of other people.
@PedroFerreira-ze5yp
@PedroFerreira-ze5yp 3 месяца назад
@@pauls3075 wow! you smart! so intelligence, so culture!
@kevin_czirchiringa834
@kevin_czirchiringa834 2 месяца назад
Terrence Howard has just entered the house ladies and gents....
@Mathematchit
@Mathematchit 3 месяца назад
I know this episode, are you running out of ideas?
@hermankoopman9468
@hermankoopman9468 Месяц назад
brilliant
@trippywong8953
@trippywong8953 3 месяца назад
Can't choose quality. Damn it's as blur as can be...
@yrrahladiv
@yrrahladiv 18 дней назад
There is a great Mathemacian.
@tusharpotdar5762
@tusharpotdar5762 2 месяца назад
Lucas number are more better than Fibonacci number.
@genehawkridge1919
@genehawkridge1919 2 месяца назад
Mathematics is a language we use to describe nature. It's a cultural construct. Mathematics follows nature, not vice-versa.
@gdiwolverinemale4th
@gdiwolverinemale4th Месяц назад
It is not a cultural construct, but it is a language. The mesmerizing issue discussed in the video is why there is such complete compliance between the complicated abstract language and the real world
@Tinker1950
@Tinker1950 25 дней назад
@@genehawkridge1919 The very thing it is not - is a 'cultural construct'.
@TomAdamson-m9i
@TomAdamson-m9i Месяц назад
Could do without background noise.
@LetLoveBeVast
@LetLoveBeVast 3 месяца назад
Forgive me, but in all fairness to scientific approach and method: I failed to see how they have proven whether lemurs can count thesis-ish: can species deemed more primitive than us also count numbers like us?) ..? All I saw was lemurs being able to discriminate between “one all alone” and “many.” I did the same. But I also know that I know near to nothing. Would very much like to read the paper on this research. Yup. Just sayin’, bit of a geek here☝🏼 Math and the many ideas concerning its makeups is all very cool, by the way 🙏🏼
@samuelgarrod8327
@samuelgarrod8327 3 месяца назад
We have no way to know how lemurs count. But the one that owns the local corner shop seems to have it sussed.
@-danR
@-danR 2 месяца назад
I'm wondering if you watched the entire lemur segment, where it goes quite beyond 'one v. many' objects on the screen, showing Terry choosing 3 v. 5 objects. Those are just circles, and it gets even more complex, including variations size, shape, color, and distribution.
@kateknowles8055
@kateknowles8055 2 месяца назад
Mathematicians count: 1, 2, .... when counting (or labelling ) lemmas (and corollaries) 😏
@viennois0123
@viennois0123 Месяц назад
When you get there, you at the beginning.😊
@grenenthomas8115
@grenenthomas8115 3 месяца назад
Harmonic series is the only perfect musical scale.
@dodgeman789
@dodgeman789 3 месяца назад
adam is an excellent engineer i loved seeing him in the perserverance rover doc
@samuelgarrod8327
@samuelgarrod8327 3 месяца назад
This is hilarious bs. Brilliantly bad. 😂
@reneerichard510
@reneerichard510 3 месяца назад
Not bad. Outdated!
@leolacic9442
@leolacic9442 2 месяца назад
Sotona će vam sve obećati ali neće moći ostvariti vaše ciljeve.
@magnusaugustus
@magnusaugustus Месяц назад
Great pbs, greetings from brazil
@mrp8811
@mrp8811 Месяц назад
shite
@SiiamW
@SiiamW 3 месяца назад
This was posted previously.
@Healthybody95
@Healthybody95 Месяц назад
what new ideas about mathematics did you learn?
@Healthybody95
@Healthybody95 Месяц назад
Need info so answer it please
@alainbellemare2168
@alainbellemare2168 3 месяца назад
The language of proportions
@brynzejurly4365
@brynzejurly4365 9 дней назад
BSIE 1-5N
@TheMactoni
@TheMactoni Месяц назад
beautiful! thank you
@bryanrumwell8753
@bryanrumwell8753 2 месяца назад
great math mystory my ass
@leevanhallam
@leevanhallam Месяц назад
18,912
@DemonetisedZone
@DemonetisedZone 2 месяца назад
all these scientific technological advances yet we are no further forward in explaining conciouscness than we were 2,500 years ago, bizarre to say the least
@geroldbendix1651
@geroldbendix1651 2 месяца назад
Read Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam, or Sri Isopanishad. I understand your point though, today's "science is completely materialistic.
@Eremon1
@Eremon1 2 месяца назад
Math still can't explain Florida.
@kateknowles8055
@kateknowles8055 2 месяца назад
Something heavy and fast fell into the middle of what is now tha Gulf of Mexico. That would account for the west coast of Florida. 🌎🌠🌊It was more than a splash. Maths is like Science. It is not for us to make a religion or belief system. One counter example destroys a hypothesis ( instantly )💧,🌊
@AUSTRALIANAMADE
@AUSTRALIANAMADE Месяц назад
I combined 3 algebraic rules to decipher the Ishango Bone, although it could have been done without. We naturally see clusters of the same, and that may be considered the 'counting factor' we have.
@Tinker1950
@Tinker1950 25 дней назад
@@AUSTRALIANAMADE I think I've spotted a weirdo.
@AUSTRALIANAMADE
@AUSTRALIANAMADE 24 дня назад
@@Tinker1950 The problem with math is you. And people like you.
@AUSTRALIANAMADE
@AUSTRALIANAMADE 24 дня назад
@@Tinker1950 Why would you write that? Are you an adult bully, who wants purpose. I'll give you one. Learn to count before you discredit.
@Tinker1950
@Tinker1950 24 дня назад
​​@@AUSTRALIANAMADE ​ Quod erat demonstrandum may well be applicable here. However, as an informed science graduate my counting and mathematical skills are adequate. But why my remark you ask. Well, firstly you write in that self-aggrandising style typical of the online partially knowledged. You provide no explanation of what you write, it is after all, essentially unknown to most. Next, the Ishango bone(s) have been assessed and led to a very small number of theses - conjecture rather than proof of concept is all that can be offered. However, you attempt to imply or claim a solution to the conundrum of the bones - but no attempt to link to your published achievement. Considering the great age of the bones, I'm sure the specialities of archaeology and anthropology not to mention, history and to a lesser extent, mathematics would be agog with your claims. On a more realistic, common sense footing, I don't think RU-vid is the accepted forum for making ground-breaking claims - not unless you lack insight and academic training of course.
@Tinker1950
@Tinker1950 24 дня назад
@@AUSTRALIANAMADE seems I hit the nail on the head. Oh, and by the way, 'counting' is hardly an intellectual exercise, well not for most people.
@ctlo4403
@ctlo4403 3 месяца назад
Esperanza Spalding!!!!!! ❤❤❤❤❤
@jaybanger7165
@jaybanger7165 Месяц назад
👍
@abinoypaulalex
@abinoypaulalex 3 месяца назад
😅
@stuboyd1194
@stuboyd1194 3 месяца назад
This is like saying "Isn't it amazing how the words we use to describe the universe describe it so well?" People invented the mathematical abstractions we use to measure and quantify real things in our universe. Maths is simply a useful tool we have to do this. New techniques to make it easier or more accurate, etc are discovered from time to time.
@TheChild888
@TheChild888 3 месяца назад
Darren Aronofsky's "π" (Pi)
@CyberspacedLoner
@CyberspacedLoner 3 месяца назад
First Comment
@touchofgrey5372
@touchofgrey5372 3 месяца назад
Congratulations; You are now a member of that Lemur group!
@mohamedroshdy5441
@mohamedroshdy5441 3 месяца назад
Interesting behaviour, worthy of study
@kateknowles8055
@kateknowles8055 2 месяца назад
The commentators appear according to their agendas, their personas and social need, and/or their desire to be helpful, their seeking for knowledge , (best reasons) We could study the rate of appearance of commentators as a data handling exercise with sociological possibility.
@topquark22
@topquark22 3 месяца назад
I did very well in mathematics in university. Often I encountered calculations involving lots of sin() and cos() functions. They always simplified down. Now I wish I had just used some change of coordinates. It would have made the paper much simpler.
@000parkin000
@000parkin000 2 месяца назад
Allah God created everything with perfect...it revealed 1400 year ago now science approaching more and more of each verse
@fireworxz
@fireworxz Месяц назад
Nonsense
@dalenebasson5628
@dalenebasson5628 2 месяца назад
God's intelligent creation.
@Tinker1950
@Tinker1950 25 дней назад
@@dalenebasson5628 Idiot level comment.
@hariomtatsat8677
@hariomtatsat8677 2 месяца назад
Saying maths is invented is out right nonsence. Even if homo sapiens are not there astronomy, cosmology or electro magnetic theory works. Maths doesn't need human intervention.
@erniesulovic4734
@erniesulovic4734 3 месяца назад
To the guy who said....the universe is only based on mathematical properties, i have news for him. As much as I love maths and was studying it as my UnderGrad until my life changed directions, the universe is based on consciousness which is not based on maths or logic. Logic does not exist in nature
@EL-be_real
@EL-be_real 3 месяца назад
Does logic exist in the human mind? Are we part of nature?
@erniesulovic4734
@erniesulovic4734 3 месяца назад
@@EL-be_real Logic is a man-made construct and yes we are part of nature. One does not see rain use logic to fall. Nor do we see a tree use logic to grow. The universe is based on consciousness, not logic.
@EL-be_real
@EL-be_real 3 месяца назад
​@@erniesulovic4734Logic is intelligence. I do not believe that it is a construct of man as it is readily seen in animals. What is a construct of man is how logic is expressed by man-- through maths and sciences... those are languages.
@erniesulovic4734
@erniesulovic4734 3 месяца назад
@@EL-be_real Good points. Fair enuf 🙂
@stevenrussell6787
@stevenrussell6787 2 месяца назад
The universe is conscious I take it Ur a Trump supporter lol😅
@josephwiebe4617
@josephwiebe4617 3 месяца назад
Anyone can build a bridge, only an engineer can build a bridge that is just strong enough to stand
Далее
Лиса🦊 УЖЕ НА ВСЕХ ПЛОЩАДКАХ!
00:24
What Is Beyond The Edge?
48:07
Просмотров 6 млн
The Trillion Dollar Equation
31:22
Просмотров 9 млн