The history of all Chinese, Tungusic, Korean, Japanese, Mongolian, Turkic, Vietnamese and European states within the boundaries of political and cultural East Asia.
docs.google.com/document/d/1iCwWG60jRTwKtSaoVaWQKqsVfkLqKEvx2GD8_KItfrU/edit?usp=sharing Here is the timeline document I wrote for this video, maybe it can help with your History of the World 2.0 video too. Although keep in mind that some of the details are missing, so for those you should probably watch the video at half speed or slower so you don't miss anything
OMG U COMMENT THIS THIS IS WAY BETTER THAN TIGERSTAR'S VERSION OF EAST ASIA IM HAPPY THAT THE DRAGON HISTORIAN IS DOING MY COUNTRYS STORY DETAILY (china) and im not from that stooped mainland im from hk
@@Orgil. Do you know anything about betrayals among the components of Ming army? Ive seen reports that indicate the eunuchs who had control of cavalry betrayed the Ming and helped Essen Taishi in anhilating the Ming army
Sorry for the really really long wait. But it's finally here! I hope you guys enjoy :) I also apologize that the video looks somewhat out of focus (that's the best way I can describe it). I had to cut down the quality a little bit while rendering the video in Premiere Pro and then RU-vid butchered it. Even the colors were modified slightly, for example Russia is supposed to be a much darker shade of green, etc. Anyway, I hope that doesn't get in your way of watching the video. EDIT: It seems like the colors are back to normal now, I guess it just took RU-vid really long to process the whole thing. The out-of-focusy feel is still there though. Thank you guys for watching regardless! EDIT: I just noticed a mistake that I made, Mongolia after 1992 should be just "Mongolia," not the Mongolian People's Republic.
sorry，I have opinion of you.You're a typical Korean，it's complete ignorance for West of ancient China（central Asia）and the Tibetan Empire（Stress）.
Awesome! I can see the overloaded amount of effort put into this video and mostly accurate. Just a little flaw that I found. ( 4:08 ) I believe that Anxi Protectorate of Tang was taken over by the Tibetan Empire (吐蕃) instead of the Uyghurs. Gansu area was only to be able to be back into Tang's hand due to internal turmoil of Tibet later on and the Uyghurs gained respective Independences soon after. Example Reference: /watch?v=-foZ5RcCm8U (13:06 - 13:58) What do you think?
Hi! I'm glad that you enjoyed the video. At 4:08, I showed that the Anxi Protectorate got destroyed by a nation not inside the scope of this map - i.e. the Tibetan Empire. However, I did show Gansu being taken over by the Uyghur Khanate. Is that what you were pointing out?
Oh, OK my bad it looked like Uyghurs took over the area from the Gansu pathway so I thought they were the ones that later took over Tarim Basin. It makes sense now.
Few Noticeable Errors: Han dynasty’s western territories location seems off, you showed the territory in the middle of taklamakan desert, it should be more north than that. Tang dynasty had more western territories, because they had fought wars in Persia. Dzungaria had Aksai-Chin region, because that’s the only way they can take to control Tibet (Dzungaria and Tibet was separated by Kunlun mountain, the eastern end of Kunlun was controlled by Qing dynasty which is the enemy of Dzungaria. The only way the can have control on Tibet is through Aksai-Chin)
As a Mongol, It looks pretty faultless to my knowledge of history. Except the northern yuan dynasty was basically divided between right wing and left wing. Khalkhas and Southern Mongols (Chahar, khorchin etc..). I'm referring to it because you decided to split four oirats which I think is a good decision.
some mistake： 1 Dong ou what appear in 190 BCE in this ，it was established by Yue as their fedual subject in 472 BCE ，after Yue annex Wu，they had too many land ，so Yue‘s king establish the subject manage south land. but Dong ou was survived after Chu annex Yue until Han combine their in 138 BCE. 2 when the Ming rise , he met Chen Youliang ， Zhang Shicheng and another enemy clique，but they haven't appear in the time.
Absolutely Amazing work as always! However, one nitpick, you forgot the three kingdoms of 14th century Okinawa; Chuzan Hokuzan, and Nanzan, which split the island until 1429, when the Ryukyu kingdom comes in, but other than that, I see no problems. One question though, I noticed that during the Sengoku, you showed many of the Japanese clans and the Ikko-Ikki as seperate entities from the Ashikaga government, were these actually independent states? I always assumed they were all subservient to the central government, but warring among st themselves.
Thanks for telling me about the three kingdoms of Okinawa! I really had no idea. As for the Sengoku Period, I like to think it as similar to the Warlord Era in China. Just like many of the warlord cliques were fighting for control of the Beiyang Government in Beijing, the clans were fighting for control of Kyoto. Therefore, whichever clan was in control of Kyoto at the time was shown as the Ashikaga Shogunate in the video.
Turkic has always been a predominantly spoken language, used at the courts of the local rulers, in the army, by rural or nomadic populations, and as a lingua franca among the multiethnic tribal confederations. It was even the language of communication in the Mongol army. Turkic has also been a supra-regional language of communication among smaller communities of speakers of minority languages and a means of communication among people of different ethnic backgrounds in certain social and professional groups, e.g. the Bāzārī class in Teheran.
제 영상에서 수정하고 싶었던 부분들까지 이 영상에 있는 것을 보고 좋았습니다. 아무래도 님의 영상도, 저의 영상도한반도 부분이 비교적 세밀하게 나오고 그 외 지역은 상세하지 못 한 것이 한계인 듯 합니다 ^^;;궁금한 부분이 있는데 1880년경 조선이 청나라 색깔로 표시되는 것은 어째서 인가요?청나라의 간섭 때문인가요? 결국 청일전쟁이 조선에 벌어질 정도로 두 나라 사이에서 고전했다고는 하지만엄연히 독립된 국가였는데 말이죠.
+The Dragon Historian 임오군란 때 파병의 댓가로 맺은 조약의 내용은 상행위와 관련된 내용이었습니다. 속국이라는 표현 하나로 조선이 청나라의 영토가 되는것은 아니죠. 조선은 청나라와의 불평등조약 이후 다른 서양 제국주의 열강들과도 조약들을 맺습니다. 독자적인 외교권이 있었죠. 또한, 청나라는 조선에 대한 간섭으로 우위를 보이려 했지만 일본을 필두로 러시아, 미국, 영국 등 다른나라들이 인정하지 않았습니다. 조선 내 친청파,친러파,친일파 등의 세력 간 힘겨루기가 있었구요. 단지 조청조약의 한 단어로 조선이 청나라 땅인 것으로 하는 것은 잘못되었습니다. 오히려 그 문구는 조공관계를 가지고 조선 종주권으로 확대해석 주장했던 청나라의 바람이었죠. 조선이 청의 속국이 아니었고 다른 나라들도 조선을 청의 속국으로 여기지않았으니까요.
@@TheDragonHistorian 만약에 조선이 청의 속국이었다면 국기를 정할때 청의 조언대로 청나라의 국기와 똑같이 정하고 색만 다르게 함으로써 청의 속국이었음을 드러내지 않았을까요? 하지만 고종은 청의 마젠창의 제안을 거절하고 조선만의 독자적인 국기를 정했습니다. 이것만으로도 조선은 독립국가였다는 증거가 될 수 있고요 또 당시에 조선은 관세의 개념조차 없었을정도로 국제사회의 인식이 희박했습니다. 서구열강과의 조약중 하나에서 청나라가 원하는대로 속국표시를 했다고 속국으로 취급되는것은 이상하다고 생각합니다. 그리고 민비정권의 가장 큰 뒷배가 청나라였고 임오군란에서도 국왕이 위기를 느끼고 청나라에 도움을 요청한 것이지 그걸로 속국이라고 취급할 수 없다고 생각합니다.
@@msmmoa8935 청나라의 의도를 보면 알 수 있죠. 당시 19세기 청나라는 서구 국가들한테 뒤져라 처맞던 상태여서 자신들의 영토를 뺏기지 않기 위해 전까지는 그냥 자기들 영토에서 살게 냅뒀던 위구르지역도 신장이라는 이름을 대며 속국화 시켰습니다. 조선도 이와 다를바 없어요.
It's like Troy, some thing really was there, but people are not sure about if it is really called Troy back then, same with Xia, it could have a different name at, because the Shang after it was also called Yin...
@@riza-2396 that's not entirely accurate. Shang was the name of the country, Yin was the name of the people who ruled it. In the case of Xia, the people who ruled the country were called the Xiahous. I'm pretty sure the video owner put the question mark there because there is actually no archaeological evidence that this country even existed.
@@kisaragiayami No you are totally wrong, Yin is not the name of the people who ruled it, the people are just Shang people. Yin is the capital city of the later half of Shang dynasty, it is famous because Pangeng's decision of moving the capital city to Yin brought prosperity to Shang. Xiahou is also not the ruler of Xia, the ruler has 2 titles, before Qin Shi Huangdi it was Wang, translated to King, after him it was Huangdi or just Huang or Di, translated to emperor. The rulers of Xia, Shang and Zhou are all Wang, translated to King. Xiahou is a family name, meaning the Hou of Xia, Hou is a kind of nobel in ancient China. The Zhou dynasty had 5 levels of nobles: Gong, Hou, Bo, Zi, Nan. This is different depending on different dynasties. When Zhou defeated Shang, Xia people were settled in Qi(it's qǐ not qí), the ruler of Qǐ changed from Hou to Gong and then to Hou and then to Bo, at the end Qǐ was annexed by Chu, the refugees of Qǐ immigrated to Lu, the Gong of Lu honoured them as Hou of Xia because the ancestors of those people. Which leads to the family name Xiahou. Also those are actually Shi, not Xing, the Xing are the original family names, but when population grows, split branches of families used Shi as their family names because there are too many people from the same families and it's hard to distinguish smaller branches. The Xing of ruler of Xia was Si, one of the eight oldest family names, their Shi was Xiahou, but it is not the same "hou" of Xiahou as the later ones from Qǐ, it's 后hòu not 侯hóu during the Xia dynasty. Xing and Shi only existed differently before Qin Shi Huangdi, after him Xing and Shi are the same meaning, just family names.
Amazing from China, Japan, Korea (North And South), Mongolia, Russian Far East, Tibet, Taiwan, Manchuria, Perhaps parts of Vietnam and maybe a few others have very fascinating articles of recordings
@@rete5132 Taiwan is not China. Taiwan was originally an independent country and was inhabited by indigenous people. After the Dutch colonization began and the Japanese Zheng Chenggong drove out the Dutch, Han Chinese from the mainland began to migrate. After that, Jurchen ruled Taiwan, but the Japanese Empire destroyed the Qing dynasty and Taiwan was annexed by Japan.
@@yidminselaks Taiwan was taken over by the Kuomintang government of the Republic of China. Currently, most Taiwanese speak Chinese due to the Han Chinese assimilation policy, but ethnically speaking, more than 80% are non-Han Chinese.
Usually, the East Asian culture sphere involves the people mentioned in this video. Sure, Tibetans are distantly related to Sinitic, same as Burmese, but they are usually only seen as tangentially part of it
@@NIDELLANEUM yes. But the other hand Tibet is culturally and, most importantly, ethnically/genetically close to Eastern Asia rather than India or Turkic countries. But yeah the cool thing about us is that we made our own and singular culture, independent from others.
Pretty well done! Respect! It gives quite a good chronology. Some errors: 1) Naimans, Tatars, Khereids, Khamag Mongols/Borjigin were all Mongolic tribes, not actually Turkic. They all spoke the same language and Tatars on the Mongolian Steppes have not much to do with Tatarstan today or Tatars in Crime or Siberian Tatars. Just the name Tatar was bestowed to the Turkic tribes later. The name Tatar is the most wrongly used name in the history. Sometimes mixing with the word Tartaria. 2) Dinling was not Turkic, according to the recent research findings. They were Scythian/Indo-European with Tagar Culture, like Sogdians. But nowadays everyone claims all the old tribes as theirs. Pity for the historical science. Dinling was simply assimilated into neighboring the Turkic tribes and Mongolic Xianbei.
fk sad turkic trying to made japan and korea are they sibling lel cause they are shameful of they own turkic origin which who get invade by the real turk then fuck they woman then made the men watch and belive that the one fucking they wife are they brother ( which is not cause the turk are outsider who come to invade the now day turk land who the native are not turk lol )
@@batukaganbat6093 they are no relaitve nation sbut they are share COMMON Origin in Sibira . Black Poeples: Banthu Peoples: South african , Tanzanian , Mozambiq, Madagascar and Kenyan Aborgines ( Black-White mix) : Niger-Congo (West) Peoples: Nigeria, Gabon,Congo,Senegal Eastern Aborgines : Dravidians( souh hinduistan ),Thamils,Sinotics(today chinese)Thai,Vietnamse,Malays,Australians and ınca peoples Early Farmers ( Mosttl white butt have black people features) : Semitic (West) Peoples : Eagptians, Magreps, Arabs and oher Malta,Sudan,Mouritania peoples Hamitic (East) Peoples : Some anatolian and middle east nations, Armenians and some caucasians, Mezopotamian, Judens . White Peoples: Indo Peoples (West) : Indians, Persians,Hellanic,Celts Siberian Peoples ( East) : Americans native,Peleo sibirians,Tıbet-Jomons,Yenısey(Zhao,Wei),Koreans,Tungus,Altaic,Ural peoples .
Well done. Very well done. I am not a professional historian, but I feel you made this from a very fair and objective perspective. I read some complaints and criticitical comments on the way you did. But, please don't be swayed by those nationalists and manipulators from different countries. Just give facts, only facts. A Big hug from abroad for Koreans and people in other Asian countries who are constantly bullied by certain big country!!!
Some missing pieces...Indo-europan Yuezhi/Tocharians in early history and the Qiang and Tubo(early Tibetan) people who were major players at different periods in history. The areas in modern day Qinghai and Tibet was not a black hole, there were some powerful kingdoms there throughout history.
You're right, but it appears the video creator left out everything west of China on purpose. As you might notice, the Empire of Tibet is never shown, nor is anything else in the western parts of the map. These regions are only included when East Asian powers conquer them. With the amount of detail he put into making this video, it's evident that this is not a mistake, but rather a choice of preference to only include East Asian history (although whether or not Tibet and the Tarim Basin are/aren't East Asia is debatable).
최근 한국사 공부하다가 눈에 띄길래 들어와봤습니다. 조회수 4만밖에 안되는데 이렇게나 난장판이라니 동아시아의 예민한 정치상황을 반영하는 것 같아서 안타깝기도 하네요. 한국사만 해도 머리아픈데 중국 고대의 그 많은 국가들, 그리고 베트남을 포함한 중국 외 국가들까지 세세히 반영하시다니 대단하십니다. 업로더분과 댓글에서 언급하신 Ollie Bye 님의 영상 즐겨찾기 해놓고 간간이 봐야겠습니다ㅎ 수고하세요~
I'm from Sakha Republic (North-Eastern Siberia). We originated from Baikal territory but migrated to the north, theoretically in the past we were the small part of Xiongnu confederation. We have turkic, mongolic and tungusic in our bloods. Historically our enemies were Chinese, but I wish one time we will make a big union of East Asian people. Respect to our East Asian blood brothers, expecially for Korea because I like your country very much and I've been there for many times. Remember, we have the real chance to control the whole World. China, Korea, Japan, Mongolia, Manchuria and others, we will rule this world.
Maybe someday you guys have your own country and will be known as nordic countries in Asia far east because of your geography, culture, and looks of the people. You guys in siberia are the palest asians.
koreans are from baikal as well. We always had many proverbs about the lake and it's funny that the scientist tests a genetic squence found in a cave near Baikal. and the gene was closest to korean people. I am serious. I think Koreans were the true genes or people of baikal immigrated 7000 years ago. and still have the gene unlike other mongolic people. mongolians are now diverse. They share chinese white middle eastern blood.
pozk 16661 there are no such a enemy at all since it is a more than 2000 years journey with couples of Dynasties have been destroyed,the main blood of Huns,tungusic and mongols(even the golden blood of khan) are all mixed with Chinese Han people. The ancestor you mentioned are basically Chinese now, and you can not even tell from they looks . It’s like in the Roma age, Greek and Latin Roman people are enemy,but after hundreds years, the main people of Roma(Byzantine) are Greek people.
"Proto-Ainu" is an odd way of referring to the peoples of the Japanese archipelago in the ancient past. The more widely accepted term across disciplines is simply "Jomon peoples"
You're right, but the distinction is still valid. While all pre-Yayoi inhabitants of the Japanese islands are considered Jomon people, genetic and historical evidence has revealed that the Jomon were not a heterogenous group. Despite sharing many cultural similarities, Jomon people from northern Japan and Jomon people from southern Japan also had plenty of differences. Jomon remains from Ryukyu and Kyushu are genetically very different from Jomon remains from Hokkaido and Tohoku. The southern Jomon were more closely related to early continental East Asians and Taiwanese aboriginals, and the northern Jomon were more closely related to coastal Paleolithic Siberian groups. And what we know of their cultures from archeological, oral, and written historical evidence backs that up: While southern Jomon society was semi-agricultural and in part matriarchal with female chieftains and priestess cults, the northern Jomon were primarily hunter-gatherers who were less matriarchal, more tribal, and practiced a more nature-heavy form of animism. So yeah, it's good to separate the two Jomon cultures, but I also agree that calling them "Jomon" and "Proto-Ainu" is not the best choice of names. "Northern Jomon" and "Southern Jomon" would work just fine.
No 😂 weiman was a Yan dynasty remnant. After the han dynasty conquered the Yan dynasty, weiman fled to gojoseon where he showed the king there how to use iron, and became a general. He then overthrew the king of gojoseon and ruled it for himself.
those are the protectorates of the Tang Empire, according to the Old Book of Tang, the official historic document of the Tang Dynasty. According to the primary source, there were four protectorates under the Anxi protectorate. Also it had mentioned the Tang Empire had set up a Persia protectorate in modern day Iran. 高昌 汉车师前王之庭。汉元帝置戊己校尉于此。以其地形高敞，故名高昌。其故垒有八城。张骏置高昌郡，后魏因之。魏末为蠕蠕所据，后麹嘉称高昌王于此数代。贞观十四年，讨平之，以其地为西州。其高昌国境，东西八百里，南北五百里。寻置都督府，又改为金山都督府。 柳中 贞观十四年置 交河 县界有交河，水源出县北天山，一名祁连山，县取水名。地本汉车师前王庭 蒲昌 贞观十四年，于始昌故城置，县东南有蒲类海，胡人呼为婆悉海 天山 贞观十四年置，取祁连山为名。 北庭都护府 贞观十四年，侯君集讨高昌，西突厥屯兵于浮图城，与高昌相响应。及高昌平。二十年四月，西突厥泥伏沙钵罗叶护阿史那贺鲁率众内附，乃置庭州，处叶护部落。长安二年，改为北庭都护府。自永徽至天宝，北庭节度使管镇兵二万人，马五千匹；所统摄突骑施、坚昆、斩啜；又管瀚海、天山、伊吾三军镇兵万余人，马五千匹。至上元元年，陷吐蕃。旧领县一，户二千三百。天宝领县三，户二千二百二十六，口九千九百六十四。在京师西北五千七百二十里，东至伊州界六百八十里，南至西州界四百五十里，西至突骑施庭一千六百里，北至坚昆七千里，东至回鹘界一千七百里。 金满 流沙州北，前汉乌孙部旧地，方五千里。后汉车师后王庭。胡故庭有五城，俗号"五城之地"。贞观十四年平高昌后，置庭州以前，故及突厥常居之。 轮台 取汉轮台为名。 蒲类 海名 已上三县，贞观十四年与庭州同置. 瀚海军 开元中盖嘉运置，在北庭都护府城内，管镇兵万二千人，马四千二百匹 天山军 开元中，置西州城内，管镇兵五千人，马五百匹。在都护府南五百里。 伊吾军 开元中置，在伊州西北五百里甘露川，管镇兵三千人，马三百匹，在北庭府东南七百里。 盐治州都督府 盐禄州都督府 阴山州都督府 大漠州都督府 轮台州都督府 金满州都督府 玄池州 哥系州 咽面州 金附州 孤舒州 西盐州 东盐州 叱勒州 迦瑟州 冯洛州 已上十六番州，杂戎胡部落，寄于北庭府界内，无州县户口，随地治畜牧。 安西大都护府 贞观十四年，侯君集平高昌，置西州都护府，治在西州。显庆二年十一月，苏定方平贺鲁，分其地置濛池、昆陵二都护府。分其种落，列置州县。于是，西尽波斯国，皆隶安西都护府。仍移安西都护府理所于高昌故地。三年五月，移安西府于龟兹国。旧安西府复为西州。龙朔元年，西域吐火罗款塞，乃于于阗以西、波斯以东十六国，皆置都督，督州八十，县一百一十，军府一百二十六，仍立碑于吐火罗以志之。咸亨元年四月，吐蕃陷安西都护府。至长寿二年，收复安西四镇，依前于龟兹国置安西都护府。至德后，河西、陇右戍兵皆征集，收复两京。上元元年，河西军镇多为吐蕃所陷。有旧将李元忠守北庭，郭昕守安西府，二镇与沙陀、回鹘相依，吐蕃久攻之不下。建中元年，元忠、昕遣使间道奏事，德宗嘉之，以元忠为北庭都护，昕为安西都护。其后，吐蕃急攻沙陀、回鹘部落，北庭、安西无援，贞元三年，竟陷吐蕃。 北庭都护府 本龟兹国。显庆中，自西州移府治于此。东至焉耆镇守八百里，西至疏勒镇守二千里，南至于阗二千里，东北至北庭府二千里，南至吐蕃界八百里，北至突骑施界雁沙川一千里。安西都护府，镇兵二万四千人，马二千七百匹。都护兼镇西节度使。 安西都护所统四镇 龟兹都护府 本龟兹国。其王姓白，理白山之南。去瓜州三千里，胜兵数千。贞观二十二年，阿史那社尒破之，虏龟兹王而还，乃于其地置都督府，领蕃州之九。至显庆三年，破贺鲁，仍自西州移安西府置于龟兹国城 毗沙都督府 本于阗国。在葱岭北二百里，胜兵数千。俗多机巧。其王伏阇信，贞观二十二年入朝。上元二年正月，置毗沙都督府，初管蕃州五。上元元年，分为十。在安西都护府西南二千里 疏勒都督府 本疏勒国。在白山之南，胜兵二千。去瓜州四千六百里。贞观九年，遣使朝贡，自是不绝。上元中，置疏勒都督府，在安西都护府西南二千里 焉耆都督府 本焉耆国。其王姓龙，名突骑支，常役于西突厥。俗有鱼鳖之利。贞观十八年，郭孝恪平之，由是臣属。上元中，置都督府处其部落，无蕃州。在安西都护府东八百里。 西域十六都督州府 龙朔元年，西域诸国，遣使来内属，乃分置十六都督府，州八十，县一百一十，军府一百二十六，皆隶安西都护府，仍于吐火罗国立碑以纪之. 月氏都督府 于吐火罗国所治遏换城置，以其王叶护领之。于其部内分置二十四州，都督统之 太汗都督府 于嚈哒部落所治活路城置，以其王太汗领之。仍分其部置十五州，太汗领 条枝都督府 于诃达罗支国所治伏宝瑟颠城置，以其王领之。仍于其部分置八州 大马都督府 于解苏国所治数瞒城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置三州 高附都督府 于骨咄施国所治妖沙城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置三州 修鲜都督府 于罽宾国所治遏纥城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置十一州 写凤都督府 于失苑延国所治伏戾城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置四州 悦般都督府 于石汗那国所治艳城置，以其王领之。仍分其部置双縻州 奇沙州 于护特健国所治遏密城置，仍分其部置沛薄、大秦二州 和默州 于怛没国所治怛城置，仍分置栗弋州 挔扌敖州 于乌拉喝国所治摩竭城置 昆墟州 于护密多国所治抵宝那城置 至秬州 于俱密国所治措瑟城置 鸟飞州 于护密多国所治摸廷城置 王庭州 于久越得犍国所治步师城置 波斯都督府 于波斯国所治陵城置。(Persia protectorate) 右西域诸国，分置羁縻州军府，皆属安西都护统摄。自天宝十四载已前，朝贡不绝。今于安西府事末纪之，以表太平之盛业也。l
Wouldn't the Proto-Mongols have been further east, somewhere around northeastern China and far eastern Russia? The lands of present-day Mongolia were the center of several major Turkic confederations before the Mongolic-speaking peoples arrived on the scene, so it makes sense that the Proto-Turkic peoples were there and the Proto-Mongolic peoples were to their east. I've always been partial to the idea that the Xiongnu were Proto-Turkic and the Xianbei were proto-Mongolic.
@@Orgil. That's inconclusive. The prevailing theory is that the Xiongnu (Huns) were proto-Turkic, just like the groups that immediately followed them like the Gokturks and the Old Uyghurs. The Xianbei, located further to the east, were proto-Mongolic and moved in to fill the avoid after the proto-Turkic peoples moved out into Central Asia and Siberia.
You need to read more history articles that were truly written by ancient historians, and combine those knowledge with archeology discoveries. You should not stick to the "history" created during the Joseon nationalist movement period
I feel many kingdom you showed is not right. Like Yuan and Qing. It is not Sinitic. It is Han Chinese being invaded. Your map feels like it is governed by two ethnicities together which might make people feel Han Chinese are always invaded others.
Jialun Yang Yes. Yuan is created and ruled by Mongols and Qing is created and ruled by Manchus. But he did it because the rulers have went cery deep into chinese culture
