See India in my realistic Age of Empires 2 maps: THE FAR EAST ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-CmmvDXtC3ZU.html&ab_channel=SCINTILLAMDEI THE WORLD ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-v6ESlnRid70.html&ab_channel=SCINTILLAMDEI THE PACIFIC OCEAN (which I have updated since this video, fixing the Vancouver area as well as Australia and Afghanistan) ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-t6nAlzSC2fs.html&ab_channel=SCINTILLAMDEI EURASIA ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-FscEnSENTMo.html&ab_channel=SCINTILLAMDEI
One important thing is missed about 1971 is that Britain and USA sent their warship's to attack India to help Pakistan defeat India. Russia came to help of India and clearly told both countries that war with India is war with Russia and they went back. This is the reason India sided with Russia and signed that treaty.
@@unafraidarsanal3049 lool actually my ancestors are Sri Lankan, just because I might have a south asian name does not mean I live in South Asia. Just for the record I am also a massive supporter of increased relations with my country and Pakistan. As long as Canada prospers and can form allies I am happy.
@@dnhdfnfkrjxjxfjjggj3002 close but my ancestors are Sri Lankan. Fun fact, almost 1 in 200 Canadians or 0.5% of the total population is of Sri Lankan origin. Regardless my only loyalties are to Canada as I am very patriotic!
The word India (as well as related Indonesia, Indiana, Indianapolis, Indian Ocean) derive from the River Indus, called Darya e Sindh by the locals. Sindh and Hindh are 2 communities going back multi millenia.. first recorded in western literature when Alexander (Iskandar… there are many people in Pakistan called Sikander even today) travelled along the Indus River stopping along what are today Karachi, Multan, and the land of 5 Rivers (Panjab). The word Hind comes from Farsi (Persian) meaning land along the other side of Indus (Panjab, Kashmir, Rajasthan, present day Northern India). Adding the ‘Stan’ in Farsi meant ‘land of’ ie UzbekSTAN, RajasTHAN, HindSTAN, AfghanSTAN, KazakhSTAN. Etc. Interestingly the country that doesn’t have STAN in its name is Iran.. which was often called Iran-Zameen. Zameen also means land or earth. If the South Asian subcontinent rulers came from East they called it Bharat (like Ashoka and the Chandragupta who came from Bihar). The people in the East of South Asia called ‘land of’ as desh.. so Bangladesh, Uttar Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh etc.) also where the term Desi comes from.
@IBrainedMyDamage River Indus was called Sindhu in Sanskrit. Persians didn't have the sound of 'S' hence they used to call Indians as Hindu. When you mentioned RajaSTHAN, it doesn't get its name from Farsi. Sanskrit has a term STHAN which means place and that's the one we see in Rajasthan as well. When it comes to Farsi, its ancestral language is Avestan which has so many similarities with Sanskrit that one may call them sister languages. So, it makes sense to have similar terms in both languages. Although, India got its name Hindustan because of the Mughals but they don't take credit for the name Rajasthan.
@@jhanvik4940 Latin and French is easier for Europeans because they are familiar with them. Hindi is completely different to them. Instead of aooreciating his efforts here you are nit-picking and comolaining about an issue that is insignificant.
@@shivanshusingh8376 Lakshadweep is Maldives cousin, but it part of india, Maldives should join india, i hope maldives can have referendum like sikkim. to small, and china have eyes on Maldives.
Everything is fine but India is not just Taj Mahal. Taj Mahal is known for its stunning beauty but there are many architectural wonders in India. Hope world learns more about India than the usual poverty,curry,saree,Taj Mahal.
British rule = 150 years India's history = from that event when indian plate collided with Eurasian plate🤣 You can't judge a country only for those 150 years of darkness,
@@gamelover9324 maratha empire was a key player before Britishers, rule of maratha empire demolished in 1818 so honestly, Britishers didn't even ruled on India for 100 years
Yeah mate, you don't go that far back. This type of pride makes me cringe. Keep it realistic, that's like saying that African nations have a history as old since south american plate and the african plate divided and moved away from each other.
Appreciate your passion and your efforts to educate people 🙏🏽 if I may make a polite suggestion to help you up your game, I hope you don't mind, the figures you mention at 2:50 you can get an good idea of the pronunciation of their names from the first couple of lines of their Wikipedia page.
Ghana recently took down a statue of Gandhi because they found out he was a filthy racist. Speaking of which, Hitler liberated India by bankrupting the Brutish Empire. Countries teach their people to emulate the hippie because they don't want threats to their STATVS QVO, so lying to people by saying that violence achieves nothing, is what they resort to using that poster boy for the notion. I'm not saying violence is always justified, mind you. Nor did I say Hitler was trying to do Indians a favour. But dem's facts.
We should appreciate that he did take his time to pronounce it; a native who has not spoken the language cannot fully pronounce the words correctly. As Indians, we should appreciate effort over criticism.
Not even cared to mention sikhs! The brave people who defended whole india. They suffered the most during partition. And you didn't even care to mention about them. I am disliking the video to register my protest.
The conquest of the then 'Buddhist-Hindu' Afghanistan by Islamic Invaders from the year 1000 AD was followed by the annihilation of the Hindu population; the region is still called the Hindu Kush, i.e. “Hindu slaughter.” Muslim historian Firishta [full name Muhammad Qasim Hindu Shah, born in 1560 and died in 1620], the author of the Tarikh-i Firishta and the Gulshan-i Ibrahim, Ferishtha lists several occasions when the Bahmani sultans in central India (1347-1528) killed a hundred thousand Hindus, which they set as a minimum goal whenever they felt like punishing the Hindus; and they were only a third-rank provincial dynasty. The biggest slaughters took place during the raids of Mahmud Ghaznavi (ca. 1000 CE); during the actual conquest of North India by Mohammed Ghori and his lieutenants (1192 ff.); and under the Delhi Sultanate (1206-1526). The universities like Nalanda, Vikramashila etc were destroyed by the barbaric and fanatic Bakhtiyar Khilji a Turk in 1193 CE. The great library of Nalanda University was destroyed, ransacked and burnt by the soldiers of Khilji’s army and it is said that it was so vast that the manuscripts kept burning for three months. The Mughal rule lasted for approx 181 years and ruined India. History tells us that Mughal emperors had committed many criminal atrocities.....Mir Baqi, one of Mughal king Babur's generals, is well documented by historiams to have destroyed a pre-existing temple of Rama and built a mosque called Babri Masjid (Babur's mosque) at the site. * Akbar was Immoral in Character and Nature. Akbar possessed a inordinate lust for women, just like his ancestors and predecessors. One of Akbar’s motives during his wars of aggression against Rajputs was to capture their women, daughters and sisters. The Rajput women of Chittor prefered “Jauhar” (immolation) than to be captured and disrespectfully treated as servants and prostitutes in Akbar’s harem. Abul Fazal in Ain-e-Akbari provides accounts of some such acts which are too disgusting to even mention. He had burnt down thousands of villages killing innocent people. Not just that, Akbar had ordered to cut down thousands of trees . The locals in order to save the trees use to tie themselves around trees, which included children and women further infuriated Akbar and he ordered immediately to cut down the trees along with the people. Brutal. (REMEMBER : Jalal in Urdu means 'Great'. Akbar's name was Jalaluddin. And he came to be known as Jalaluddin Akbar later which translated to Jalaluddin The Great.Just like that..There is NO real greatness in Akbar) On the contrary,Maharana Pratap is considered to exemplify the qualities to which Rajputs aspire. Maharana Pratap never accepted Akbar as ruler of India, and fought Akbar all his life. Akbar first tried diplomacy to win over Maharana Pratap but nothing worked. In the siege of Chittor Akbar had killed 27,000 civilians in cold blood. This left a lasting impression on Maharana's mind and he decided he could not bow to such injustice and cruelty. The title of 'GREAT' should be rightly attributed to MAHARANA PRATAP and not Akbar. * SIMILARLY....Majority of Indians agree that Aurangzeb was a religious fanatic and a tyrant. If you read the real Mogul history we can very clearly understand this : - (1) Aurangzeb re-introduced jizya (tax) on non-Muslims, led numerous campaigns of attacks against non-Muslims, forcibly converted Hindus to Islam and destroyed Hindu temples. (2) For converting other non-muslims he never hesitated to use any tactics, including torturing in inhuman and cruel ways and never ever regretted for it.(eg) The way he tortured Sambaji,the son of Chatrapathi Shivaji is a solid proof of his inhuman attitude and intolerant nature. (3) Aurangzeb issued orders in 1669, to all his governors of provinces to "destroy with a willing hand the schools and temples of the infidels, and that they were strictly enjoined to put an entire stop to the teaching and practice of idolatrous forms of worship". These orders and his own initiative in implementing them led to the destruction of numerous temples, Some temples were destroyed entirely; in other cases mosques were built on their foundations, sometimes using the same stones. Idols in temples were smashed, and the city of Mathura was temporarily renamed as Islamabad in local official documents. (4) Last words of Aurangzeb on his death-bed to his sons: ‘I know not who I am, where I shall go , or what will happen to this sinner, full of sins. . . My years have gone by profitless. God has been in my heart, yet my darkened eyes have not recognized His true light. . . There is no hope for me in the after-life. The fever is gone, but only the skin is left. .. I have greatly sinned and know not what torment awaits me. . . ’ * ALSO....DID YOU KNOW - Tipu Sultan persecuted the Hindus & Christians and carried out forced conversions.According to C. K. Kareem, Tippu Sultan issued an edict for the destruction of Hindu temples in Kerala. Tipu got Runmust Khan, the Nawab of Kurool, to launch a surprise attack upon the Kodava Hindus (also called Coorgs or Coorgis) who were besieged by the invading Muslim army. 500 were killed and over 40,000 Kodavas were converted to the Islam, and incorporated them into Ahmedy corps. In 1788, Tipu reportedly ordered his governor in Calicut Sher Khan to begin the process of converting Hindus to Islam and in July of that year, 200 Brahmins were forcibly converted and made to eat beef..The archaeological survey of India has listed three temples which were destroyed during the reign of Tipu Sultan. These were the Harihareshwar Temple at Harihar which was converted into a mosque, the Varahswami Temple in Srirangapatnam and the Odakaraya Temple in Hospet. The following is a translation of an inscription on the stone found at Seringapatam, which was situated in a conspicuous place in the fort: 'Oh Almighty God! dispose the whole body of infidels! Scatter their tribe, cause their feet to stagger! Overthrow their councils, change their state, destroy their very root! Cause death to be near them, cut off from them the means of sustenance! Shorten their days! Be their bodies the constant object of their cares (i.e., infest them with diseases), deprive their eyes of sight, make black their faces (i.e., bring shame).' -NOW YOU KNOW
@@priyanshupandey2670 Bhai it's a thumb rule, when one only sticks to criticizing the medieval era kingdoms of moghals, sultanate etc etc, it is never for genuine history telling, it is only to further a political agenda. It is completely and horribly selective. It isn't the way to learn history. Anyway, who even reads such copy paste from random blogs, I only asked him not to spam and spoil someone's content. Have a good day!!
@@sarthakjain5929 true many hindu rulers had flaws many used to discriminate against shudras and what not so why don't you talk about that no matter how the rulers were as people they were great conquers and that was what mattered they built some of the biggest empire
A small correction....it was not the. Unwillingness of indian soldiers to march into the kashmir in 1948. Indian soldiers was on a rampage mode, the took the posts of pak terrorists one of the famous is kaid-e-azam post, which is renamed as Banapost on the name of great indian general Cap bana singh. India almost reclaimed the territory, but before that Mr.jawaharlal nehru went to UN for seize fire. This was actually happened....He dared to disband indian army🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦
It's easy just stop hating non muzlim and if pakistàn stop funding terrørizm. India doesn't care about hating Pakistan for a reason India is progressing economy while pakistàn suffers. Pakistan will also grow if they keep religion aside
U forgot the KARGIL war Where PAKISTAN was literally spanked by India and her Bofors Killing more than 1000 pak soldiers Accepted by Musaraf their then prime minister
Ur jets were shot down in kargil u couldn't capture tha mountain peaks so u asked ur daddy America for help who pressured pakistan into withdrawing pakistan still has point 553 which we captured during the kargil war it overlooks ur supply line to siachen
Yeah, what's your history? the Bangladeshi history is 80% of Hindu Bangla history. And you people no longer consider yourself to be Hindu and not see India as your main nation.
@@manavkanojia1620 they don't even have any special historical places to talk about like in India and Pakistan there are many idk what do they have? They have a little piece of land that is dependent on India without India they wouldn't even exsist
Many many thanks a lot brother. One day i request to you make this video. Finally its make you. we very very happy, we every time see your all video. Your all video very very beautiful and very informationfull, your 3D map view awesome,,,finally we support to you,,,,,thanks.
Small mistake when speaking about Operation Bluestar: The Sikhs in the complex were NOT Khalistanis. They were only advocating for Sikh and Punjabi rights and freedoms. The Khalistan movement only escalated after the attack. Bhindranwale himself was not a Khalistan supporter before his death
After watching both parts I have to say, a lot has been conveniently skipped and there is very little detail on why India deals with two border conflicts. Southern India which was one of the cradles of early Medieval Indian civilization and essentially the origin of spice trade routes with Europe has been grossly overlooked. The Bengal Rennaissance and the involvement of the INA with the Nazis and the very fact that India exerted authority (unlike what you mention in Part 1) on both the allied and axis fronts of WW2 has not been mentioned. While I agree that there is only so much you can cover in two videos, these two make it feel like a mediocre introduction to Indian history intended mainly for a Eurocentric or Americanized populace. You also miss out on the existence of a fourth class in Vedic period, that of Shudras (labourer class) and untouchability. The Indo-Pak war treaties are heavily implied to be achieved primarily due to foreign intervention. Keep these videos about facts, especially the important ones. Three videos could've done India justice, but maybe not from such a take.
Trust me no. Ask my country Nigeria. We have a northern dominated by Muslim and a southern dominated by Christians, well I guess you heard about boko Haram and the rest they say is history.
8:26 same when Neheu was elected prime Minister first time Patel won almost every seat where as Nehru won litterly none but under pressure from Ghandi, Patel didn't become Prime Minister and neheu did even though he lost btw he won no seats because the last remaining ones went to another person
We have , it's new, since 1947 , India officially has history since 1947 , anything else is History of Subcontinent or private Kingdoms not India as country as whole , And if you disagree well then that's ur dumb brain's decision
Brithishers left a disputed Kashmir in subcontinent Ind Pak Chi these countries are fighting But the fact is Pak Administered Kashmir is fully save there is no curfew people are independence literacy rate ia better than than other areas On the other side India Adms Kashmir where always chaos and curfew people are behind cage freedom movement is on peak International media is not allowed to cover Ind Occupy Territory this is very shameful Shame on UN, OIC 😡 you cannot solve these problems
@@ghanshyampatel4068 tap on the three dots located on the right side of your comment that you want to delete and a window will pop up with selection of reply, edit, delete and pick what you want.
They are pronouncing 'Jawaharlal Nehru' as 'Hawarlal Neru' bcz they might not be a native speaker of english and there might not be any 'j' sound in their language. Like in spanish too, people have h sound for the letter j.
India has a big history and culture. I have proud because i am a indian. India has oldest history in the world. Indian history is before of decades. So i love you india. ✨️
I am praying to Almighty Allah one day we conquer Britain and divided in them three part's on basis of religion, sect and race how they divided my country in name of religion IN SAA ALLAH
@@shaikhjuned5578 the "elite class of Muslims" couldn't plunge the country to civil war. It was well orchestrated and could happen again. That's why appesment in India is called secularism.
Who told? We have no problem with bangladesh, sri lanka, myanmar and even afghanistan is one of our ally , lol 2 days ago, the bangladeshi regiment marched down the rajpath on the occasion of the Indian republic day
@@greatpeopleofhimachal5043 Firslty, Pakistan doesnt hate Iran neither do they hate us we are just normal. Plus go and see how flood levels are rising in Bangladesh. Your Indian gov will have to take in your spoils of war of 160 million bengalis in the next few decades due to global warming. Their entire country will drown. Thankfully Bangladesh got independent, cant imagine taking those guys into Pakistan
@Knowledgia . Hi Sir/ Ma'am, I am John Edson Go, I am a graduate of Bachelor of Arts in History from the University of Santo Tomas in the Philippines and I'm interested to create a youtube account about World history. What would be your advice, suggestion, or tips on how to make RU-vid content about History?
Yes.Indegious Indians should support and glorify and learn Russian language and who all supported for our sovereignty independence freedom fighters warriors struggle movements of true swadeshi indegious Indians.jai hind.
