Тёмный

The Jaguar M; When the Big Cat Went to Sea 

Ed Nash's Military Matters
Подписаться 95 тыс.
Просмотров 125 тыс.
50% 1

The SEPECAT Jaguar was one of the principal attack aircraft of both Britain and France during the latter half of the Cold War. But it isn't so well remembered that one of the key requirements early in its development was to provide the French Navy with a new carrier attacker.
Sources for this video can be found at the relevant article on:
militarymatters.online/
If you like this content please consider buying me a coffee or else supporting me at Patreon:
ko-fi.com/ednashmilitarymatters
/ ednash
Want another way to help support this channel? Maybe consider buying my book on my time fighting ISIS:
amzn.to/3preYyO

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

24 ноя 2022

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 305   
@jimkrb
@jimkrb Год назад
The Jag always was a beautiful aircraft, so sleek and purposeful looking. If one was to imagine a private sports jet, look no further. 🙂
@rajatdani619
@rajatdani619 Год назад
It's Living proudly with Indian airforce only now...All other countries have retired it.. And it's completely a new aircraft now...after its Darin III upgrade..with an Elta ELM 2052 aesa radar and new avionics and newer weapons systems.. The Indian airforce calls it Deep penetrator strike aircraft.
@claudebylion9932
@claudebylion9932 Год назад
@@rajatdani619 these aircraft would be perfect for the Ukraine Air Force 👍👍👍
@brusselssprouts560
@brusselssprouts560 8 месяцев назад
I love the relic one we have at Manston Airport Museum, Kent. I pass by it frequently and look keenly at it unless I see The EE Lightning parked nearby!
@AndreasGlad-rq7vx
@AndreasGlad-rq7vx 6 месяцев назад
​@@claudebylion9932And who would pay for them?
@BunnyUK
@BunnyUK Месяц назад
I’m proud to say I got to sit in the cockpit of an operational Jaguar :)
@RobSchofield
@RobSchofield Год назад
That's the first footage I've seen of the M - a beautiful aircraft whether land or sea variant.
@AvengerII
@AvengerII Год назад
The Mitsubishi F-1 (derived from the T-2 trainer) is very similar in appearance to the SEPECAT Jaguar. The Japanese considered buying a license to build the Jaguar in country but developed their own plane. It retired around the same time as the Jaguar. The planes were worn out! The direct replacement for the F-1 was the Mitsubishi F-2, nicknamed "Viper Zero." It's basically an enlarged Block 50 F-16 derivative.
@neiloflongbeck5705
@neiloflongbeck5705 Год назад
It's so funny that Dassault was also pushing for the adoption of the single-engine Super Etandard because of the engine issue....
@mbryson2899
@mbryson2899 Год назад
Facts are unimportant when one is pitching to politicians.
@FallenPhoenix86
@FallenPhoenix86 Год назад
"Oui, le pilote avec un Etendard et no reacteur simplement flappez eze arms..."
@mbryson2899
@mbryson2899 Год назад
@@FallenPhoenix86 OUI! "Catch That Pigeon," _non_ ?
@babboon5764
@babboon5764 Год назад
Welcome to the world of business, politics and bribery Logic has Fk Hall to do with much of it.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 Год назад
@@babboon5764 Jaguar M failed its Carrier Trials Massive!!! All of the orders for the M were actually built as A's for the AdA, so the number of actual aircraft originally ordered were built.
@Locomattive8572
@Locomattive8572 Год назад
I have a real soft spot for the Jaguar. My love of planes comes from spending many an afternoon watching the Jaguars takeoff and land at RAF Colitishall. I do miss that base.
@ottovonbismarck2443
@ottovonbismarck2443 Год назад
Good old summer times in the late 70s when I could watch Belgian Mirage III, German, Dutch and Belgian F-104 and US, German and British F-4, the latter from RAF Wildenrath. I loved both the "boom" and the brutal "roar" when they went either supersonic or passed by low.
@babboon5764
@babboon5764 Год назад
We have so very FEW alternative bases still operational now ~ Thanks to George Osbourne & David Cameron closing most airfield to save a few quid ................... You can bet your 🐓IF we get into more than a shouting match with the gentlemen East of Ukraine they *won't miss* our remaining bases because there are so *very few* of them to target.
@billynomates920
@billynomates920 Год назад
i remember them as a kid from farnborough air show. all the planes were loud, taking off but the jaguars actually hurt! 🙉😖🤕
@rajatdani619
@rajatdani619 Год назад
It's Living proudly with Indian airforce now...All other countries have retired it.. And it's completely a new aircraft now...after its Darin III upgrade..with an Elta ELM 2052 aesa radar and new avionics and newer weapons systems.. The Indian airforce calls it Deep penetrator strike aircraft. It will serve until 2030's.
@stamfordly6463
@stamfordly6463 Год назад
One of HMG's oddest decisions IMO was to scrap the Jaguar without deploying them to Afghanistan or Iraq when they had quite a few hours still left on the airframes. They could have been pretty much run into the ground in environments they were designed for and the Treasury would not have been out of pocket.
@paulkirkland3263
@paulkirkland3263 Год назад
Never heard of the navalized Jaguar before. Thanks, Ed.
@tri3852
@tri3852 Год назад
I live in Rochefort! Thank you for making this video! I'll be sure to share it with the naval air museum staff!
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters Год назад
Please do. I'll have to visit the museum one day.
@envitech02
@envitech02 Год назад
Never heard of navalised Jaguar for the French Navy. I though they always had Super Etendards. The regular Jags saw a lot of action during Desert Storm.
@charliegerrie
@charliegerrie 7 месяцев назад
3:44 this footage of the Jaguar off-roading is sick
@stephenbesley3177
@stephenbesley3177 Год назад
One of my favourite cold war aircraft. I heard it wasnt always the easiest to fly but served the RAF for a long time which must say something.
@corporalpunishment1133
@corporalpunishment1133 Год назад
Thanks for your efforts your videos are always interesting. I would have thought that adapting the Jaguar for Aircraft carrier use was a no brainer it already has huge undercarriage and designed for short field operations.
@michielotsen6317
@michielotsen6317 Год назад
Great to see some footage of HKM Karel Doorman. She was on station when my father was a NL Marine during the Dutch New Guinea war against Indonesia. Later on she was sold to Argentina. As you pointed out , she was formerly a British vessel. Funny how these things turn out..
@lokai7914
@lokai7914 7 месяцев назад
The image of the French cat and its one-word response were perfect.
@rem26439
@rem26439 Год назад
I'm a simple man, I see a video opening with footage of HMCS Bonaventure, I press like!
@billlong9606
@billlong9606 Год назад
"Tales of French Military procurement" could be a channel all of it's own
@McRocket
@McRocket Год назад
8:28 - Great point. Thank you for this, Ed. ☮
@bigblue6917
@bigblue6917 Год назад
Great looking aircraft. Watching the video I did think that the Royal Navy could have used it. But as they had the Buccaneer the Jaguar would not really have a role.
@jeromeportier4914
@jeromeportier4914 8 месяцев назад
Great video, with some great footage! Thanks!
@aaronlopez492
@aaronlopez492 Год назад
Thank you, Ed, great job.
@rollosnook
@rollosnook 7 месяцев назад
Quality aviation video. Good subject and commentary, Thank you.
@sibre72
@sibre72 Год назад
Once more a brilliant video, Ed! I've watched every one of your videos and you never disappoint... As ever, a great choice of subject matter with well researched content, and all presented with aplomb!
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters Год назад
Thank you! Pleased to oblige.
@johndavey72
@johndavey72 Год назад
Thanks Ed. One of my favourite moments is witnessing two Jaguars coming in to Exeter air day early in the morning and beating up rhe airfield for 5minutes ......sensential ! (about 1982 ish ) ironically the very last airshow !
@Farweasel
@Farweasel Год назад
It wasn't the Super Etendard which was so potent, it was the Exocet it carried.
@WanderfalkeAT
@WanderfalkeAT Год назад
And the Sea RADAR that made the combination with the Exochet so deadly. The Jaguar could not even carry it because of the weight and had no RADAR to aim it.
@Farweasel
@Farweasel Год назад
@@WanderfalkeAT A fair point well made sir
@tankdriver67m64
@tankdriver67m64 Год назад
@@WanderfalkeAT Indian Air Force had a variant of the Jag with the Agave radar and exocet.
@yurypozdnyakov5177
@yurypozdnyakov5177 Год назад
It was gorgeous 1:72 model kit of Jaguar, produced by FROG and later by NOVO in Soviet Union. She was one of most beautiful aircraft for me, avail to build at that time (1980s).😍
@joso5554
@joso5554 Год назад
Actually, Heller made a model of the Jaguar M naval version !
@tomlobos2871
@tomlobos2871 Год назад
the jaguar in general is a classic forgotten aircraft though an intresting one. remember the ones being based in brüggen. quite impressive in the air though looking somehow clumsy on the ground. i think it deserves that attention, so great video again!
@patrickwalsh2884
@patrickwalsh2884 Год назад
While stationed at Memmingen, West Germany (1978-1981) a Few Jags flew in and stayed for a week or so. Got to tour the aircraft and got to know the ground crew. It was a blast. USAF 1975-1998.
@tomlobos2871
@tomlobos2871 Год назад
@@patrickwalsh2884 what did the USAF fly at that time? F-15/16 already?
@patrickwalsh2884
@patrickwalsh2884 Год назад
@@tomlobos2871 The base I was at was German and they flew f-104G's.
@tomlobos2871
@tomlobos2871 Год назад
@@patrickwalsh2884 awsome.
@Hattonbank
@Hattonbank 6 месяцев назад
Similar to the A-7 Corsair, both hard working, cost effective and accomplished ground attack aircraft overshadowed by the F-4/Lightning/F-15/16 glamour jets.
@amcds2867
@amcds2867 Год назад
Thank you. i enjoyed that bit of military aviation history.
@CAP198462
@CAP198462 Год назад
The Jaguar was unique, one of a very few that had hardpoints on top of the wings.
@offshoretomorrow3346
@offshoretomorrow3346 Год назад
EE Lightning
@joso5554
@joso5554 Год назад
The French never used them. Only the UK and India to my knowledge, and only for short range IR air to air Magic missiles.
@sameerthakur720
@sameerthakur720 6 месяцев назад
​@@joso5554Obviously. You can't have bombs on overwing pylons. And try lifting an AS-30L, Sea Eagle Or Exocet onto an overwing pylon.
@socaljarhead7670
@socaljarhead7670 Месяц назад
Not worth the drag.
@wayneorellana2549
@wayneorellana2549 Год назад
Another great "What If?" video. Thank you.
@nnoddy8161
@nnoddy8161 Год назад
Love the 2CVs sneaking in to the video....
@billballbuster7186
@billballbuster7186 Год назад
I like the RAF pilots comment that you needed to use afterburner on the Jaguar to get it out of the hangar!
@adrianrutterford762
@adrianrutterford762 Год назад
Interesting stuff. Thanks
@mycroft1905
@mycroft1905 Год назад
Excellent! Fascinating. TFP.
@fredericksaxton3991
@fredericksaxton3991 7 месяцев назад
Thank you. All new to me.
@B-A-L
@B-A-L 6 месяцев назад
When Britain and France get together and stop treating each other as rivals they do some great things like the Channel Tunnel, Concord and the Jaguar.
@michaeldelucci4379
@michaeldelucci4379 Год назад
I love the Jaguar my first metal airplane was the Jag. It was a Corgi or Dinky toy. Now I always wanted a 1/48th scale plastic model of it. I have no luck finding one
@joso5554
@joso5554 Год назад
Heller used to make them, both ground based and naval versions.
@ricardokowalski1579
@ricardokowalski1579 Год назад
Solid content
@janwitts2688
@janwitts2688 Год назад
A slightly larger wing with better air brakes and also a hot-run option for remaining engine would have resolved the issues nicely
@tri3852
@tri3852 Год назад
Issues listed in this video aren't the only ones. Another was that the aircraft needed afterburner on the catapult which overheated the deflector panels, although they tried to solve the issue by welding 20mm plates on them.
@MikeBracewell
@MikeBracewell Год назад
The twin-safety issue is a bit of a moot point. The Jaguar was never a hot-rod & had a comparatively low TWR, especially when taking-off with a heavy combat load. Moreover, it's wing-loading (despite possessing double-slotted flaps & full-span slats) was high for a naval aircraft intended to operate from small-carriers. Both factors meant it would have needed both engines to be operating correctly for it fly safely in such a scenario. Because both engines would have been needed there was double the chance of engine failure causing the loss of the aircraft compared to a single-engine type - I.E. it had two points of failure instead of just one. Even when lightly loaded, such as during approach & landing, the Jaguar would have been a handful as it was particularly prone to handling problems flying on one engine at low-speed, which is a somewhat less than desirable trait for an aircraft operating off a small aircraft-carrier.
@lafeelabriel
@lafeelabriel Год назад
Wouldn't be the first, or the last, time a aircraft manufacturer decides to sabotage a design that originated from a another company now would it..
@timcameron9023
@timcameron9023 Год назад
good point re single engine vs twin engine, never liked the etendard with the weird turkey neck thing under the nose. I have read though that the Jag was pretty underpowered, and the only reason it could take off at all was because the earth was round ;-)
@SoloRenegade
@SoloRenegade Год назад
not as uncommon as you might think for companies not wanting to sell a product under certain circumstances. Low volume with added costs for specialization? Extra regulatory requirements the company isn't prepared to deal with? Not having the expertise to develop their product for an application? trying to focus efforts on a more profitable market opportunity? etc.
@neiloflongbeck5705
@neiloflongbeck5705 Год назад
The real reason for Dassailt not to support the Jaguar for the French Navy was that they had lost out on the programme that lead to the Jaguar.
@RedXlV
@RedXlV Год назад
@@neiloflongbeck5705 Yep, it was now a product they owned, but one that their competitor had developed.
@BurgerBoyda3rd
@BurgerBoyda3rd Год назад
Hi Ed, I was recently at a military museum in Bucharest. They had a obscure I.A.R aircraft that looked like a La5. It had a weird blue paint scheme. They also built their own weird version of the jaguar that was part of the Romanian airport. You can see some of the pictures if you go look at the pictures on google.
@jackroutledge352
@jackroutledge352 Год назад
That'll be the IAR 80! Ed of course already has a video on it. Search for iar 80 in RU-vid - it's the first one that comes up.
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters
@EdNashsMilitaryMatters Год назад
Indeed! And I think the jet, iirc, was the IAR-93, which was joint produced with Yugoslavia.
@BurgerBoyda3rd
@BurgerBoyda3rd Год назад
@@jackroutledge352 it's actually not the IAR 80. They had a IAR 80 right next to this La5 looking machine. I'm really annoyed with myself that I didn't take a picture of it.
@IntrospectorGeneral
@IntrospectorGeneral Год назад
It's a Yak11SC trainer. It is a radial engined single seater. The fuselage profile is very similar to the Yak3 (from which the Yak11 was developed). It is quite a rarity without the distinctive extended canopy of the usual dual seat Yak11 variants.
@littlejohnny47
@littlejohnny47 Год назад
Ahh! Politics and weapons development…usually the doom of the outstanding. Beautiful looking aircraft!
@randomguyingasmask
@randomguyingasmask Год назад
Jaguar must be one of the sleekest aircraft design out there.
@llynellyn
@llynellyn 9 месяцев назад
It's comical that the UK had land based catapults for testing carrier aircraft, and now due to cutbacks we don't even have catapults on the carriers anymore :P
@B-A-L
@B-A-L 6 месяцев назад
Cutbacks have nothing to do with it. We haven't had catapults on carriers since the 1970s because we use VSTOL aircraft and catapults break down whereas ramps don't.
@llynellyn
@llynellyn 6 месяцев назад
@@B-A-L The whole reason we went to VSTOL from Catapults was so we could use/build much cheaper carriers (using more expensive but less capable planes in the process). As a general rule CATOBAR > STOBAR > STOVL. This is why the USA use CATOBAR (and we did prior to cutbacks) and why China, Russia, etc have dreams of upgrading to CATOBAR in the future. It's also the reason why France use STOBAR and why China/India upgraded their STOVL carriers to STOBAR (and why we have repeatedly looked at upgrading our new carriers to CATOBAR or STOBAR but each time decided it was too expensive).
@Cartoonman154
@Cartoonman154 Год назад
It would be nice to get another aircraft like the Jaguar.
@jamieshields9521
@jamieshields9521 Год назад
Well done on awesome vid👍very interesting history n not well known part of history👍any nation going for Skyhawk not bad jet for its size but lack decent radar compare to land base jets. But after Skyhawk was F18A too big of jet for Majestic aircraft carriers but would have interesting to Jaguar M offer to RAN if French did go with Jaguar M.
@joso5554
@joso5554 Год назад
Jaguar elegantly solved this dilemma : no radar onboard !
@iatsd
@iatsd Год назад
A bit like the Buccaneer: a complete dog below 300 knots, but once you're up to speed and so long as you maintain energy, an absolute delight to throw around over 300 knots
@zeitgeistx5239
@zeitgeistx5239 7 месяцев назад
France never pulled out of NATO, only out of NATO command. And they developed a work around after De Gauelle died. French forces were de facto under NATO command in forward deployment like Germany. It was revealed to the French public in the late 80s.
@honumoorea873
@honumoorea873 Год назад
My 2 first ever models, a jaguar and a Mirage F1
@Seminal_Ideas
@Seminal_Ideas Год назад
Excellent choice. In an alternative universe. The Anglo French project would be the Mirage F1 but powered by a Rolls Royce Spey turbofan as fitted to the F4K/M Phantoms.
@kentl7228
@kentl7228 Год назад
They remind me of a trainer for the F104. Sleek with wings that look too small
@NakulDalakoti
@NakulDalakoti Год назад
Indian Air Force still flies Jaguar. IAF absolutely loves it. Recently Hindustan Aeronautics came up with Jaguar Max upgrade package that includes a large area display and Israeli AESA radar to name a few. However Jaguar's service days with IAF are numbered.
@christhorpejunction8982
@christhorpejunction8982 7 месяцев назад
Kind of a shame that RN didn’t take it up, imagine Jag used as a carrier training aircraft and maybe later with Blue Fox, then Blue Vixen radar operated on three medium carriers instead of CVA01 or the Invincible class. (imagine an updated, stretched Hermes).
@timgosling6189
@timgosling6189 Год назад
By the time the RAF retired the Jag it was an incredibly capable aircraft, just old.
@Tetemovies4
@Tetemovies4 Год назад
It might sound ironic to settle for a single engine design at first but if you judge that you cannot land at sea on a single engine, it's still preferable to only have a single engine since 2 engines doubles the risk of failure (a risk which which infamously materialized with the Yak-38).
@SteamboatWilley
@SteamboatWilley Год назад
I always like to wonder if the Jaguar M had been adopted, and if the UK had retained a conventional aircraft carrier capability (by building the cancelled CVA-01), could the Jaguar M have been taken on by the Fleet Air Arm as well? The land-based Jaguar gave excellent service with the RAF.
@stephenchappell7512
@stephenchappell7512 Год назад
As the FAA already had the Buccaneer II it's unlikely that they would have adopted it although it would have opened up some interesting options for cross-deck operations
@forcea1454
@forcea1454 Год назад
The F-4M Spey Phantoms were purchased in 1964, so by the time the Jaguar M was in prototype form Britain would have already something better in service. Not to mention the Admiralty had plans for improved avionics for the Buccaneer. AFVG was also planned to be carrier-capable though, and may have been useful as both a Phantom and Buccaneer replacement.
@billynomates920
@billynomates920 Год назад
dunno, it was pretty rough on the yanks, too. i wouldn't have wanted to be on the deck of the forrestal in '67. a terrible accident and some very brave fire crews aboard that ship. 😔
@davidwebber8636
@davidwebber8636 Год назад
Fascinating. I learnt something new today.
@CaptVirtual
@CaptVirtual Год назад
Wow I never knew this maritime history of the Jag
@andrewmosher-le6ct
@andrewmosher-le6ct 9 месяцев назад
A variant of the Mirage F1 would have been interesting.
@WanderfalkeAT
@WanderfalkeAT Год назад
Hmm, interesting how a jet with those small wings could safely land on a pretty short deck. Not to mention how it would land with a payload. The Jaguar was a very good low altitude attack aircraft for it's time (at least before the Tornado) but that was because it's smaller wings made it faster on the deck. I mean it is not a deltawing but still a lot of wingload. If they would have made a version with a wider wing and a lower max speed, that would have probably made it better suited for carrier ops, not to mention more agile...
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 Год назад
High wing loading was one of the issues with operating this thing off a ship (plus the use of Spoilers for low speed roll control). A bigger wing would have made the aircraft better, but the extra drag would have made it very subsonic.
@sealove79able
@sealove79able Год назад
A great video. These French flying machines are absolutely magnifique and beautiful. The Jaguar seems like a lighter version of the Aardvark. Did it have a comparable terrain following radar suite?
@chrismartin3197
@chrismartin3197 Год назад
I think the only Jaguars with radar were Indian anti-ship Jags
@jlvfr
@jlvfr Год назад
@@chrismartin3197 Correct, all european Jaguars only had stuff like FLIR.
@sealove79able
@sealove79able Год назад
@@chrismartin3197 Thank you.
@MrHws5mp
@MrHws5mp Год назад
French Jaguar As had a very basic avionics fit. British Jaguar Es and export Jaguar Internationals had a much better fit, with an inertial nav/attack system and a Laser Rangefinder/Marked Target Seeker. The Indian Jaguar Ms had an Agave radar (same as the Super Etendard, ironically enough) so that they could find ships and fire Sea Eagle missiles at them. This wasn't a terrain-following radar like you got in the F-111 or Tornado though.
@jlvfr
@jlvfr Год назад
@@MrHws5mp India wanted an airborne anti-ship capability. The Exocet+Agave combination was proven and cheapest to adopt.
@rob5944
@rob5944 Год назад
First thing I thought was "Hey, it's only got one engine!"
@ankitmajumder4309
@ankitmajumder4309 Год назад
The indian Airforce still uses jaguars for maritime strike role. They are called the Jaguar IM
@Knight6831
@Knight6831 Год назад
Frankly I could see the British buying this to serve alongside the Hawker-Siddeley HS.1197 Buccaneer as RN carrier strike aircraft
@ottovonbismarck2443
@ottovonbismarck2443 Год назад
Why would they buy it ? They had their own Jaguars and would have adopted the design.
@harryspeakup8452
@harryspeakup8452 Год назад
more importantly, there's only so much space on a carrier and how would a Jag M have been a better use of that space than an additional Buccaneer S.3?
@ottovonbismarck2443
@ottovonbismarck2443 Год назад
@@harryspeakup8452 I guess you nailed it.
@Knight6831
@Knight6831 Год назад
Simple the Buccaneer S.3 requires 2 crew whereas the Jaguar only needs 1
@TheGrant65
@TheGrant65 Год назад
Interesting counterfactual scenario: in 1982, an Argentine Jaguar-M squadron, based at Port Stanley, has multiple roles: launching Exocets, bombing/strafing smaller vessels, intercepting Harriers, and ground attack/CAS after British landings. Could have made a big difference - given that in the real world, Super Etendards and Skyhawks based on the mainland made the war, in the words of one UK general "a close run thing".
@TheGrant65
@TheGrant65 Год назад
@*Uncle Joe* Not at all; in fact, the real world Argentine Skyhawk force, wielding "dumb bombs" and home-brewed retarders, were arguably a bigger problem for the Brits than the Exocet (not many of which were actually available or acquired by Argentina anyway). As an aside, Joe, I recall a RAN staff officer commenting, just after the Falklands War, that had Argentina had the combined assets of the ADF, it might well have defeated that particular British task force (although of course, that was probably not going to be the end of the matter).
@mikeking7381
@mikeking7381 Год назад
Never see much on the Jag was it mostly used as close air surport? Did it ever get any dog fights?
@tonyz7216
@tonyz7216 9 месяцев назад
I wonder if a navalized version of the Mirage F1 would have made sense and was considered.
@landak136
@landak136 Год назад
The wings were quite small for carrier aircraft.
@MattVF
@MattVF Год назад
May have been cheaper than re-engining the MD Phantom for the British…
@stephenchappell7512
@stephenchappell7512 Год назад
Jaguar was strike and therefore comparable to the Buccaneer whereas it was the Crusader that could have potentially have been a Phantom alternative
@mikearmstrong8483
@mikearmstrong8483 Год назад
Another factor not mentioned was that, since France had a strong nationalistic push to go "only French" for their military, the Jaguar was seen in disfavor as it was a cooperative effort with the British. The Super Etendard was pitched as a "completely French" aircraft, built solely in France, by the French and for the French. In fact, almost 40% of the Super Etendard was of foreign manufacture, with all the parts being shipped in and assembled by Dassault. This was hardly any less than the Jaguar M, which had much better performance in terms of speed, range, maneuverability, and payload capacity.
@RedXlV
@RedXlV Год назад
The Jaguar was a vastly more capable jet than the Super Etendard, with higher top speed, longer range, and nearly double the the payload. Even accounting for slight performance losses due to added weight from the carrier adaptations, the Jaguar M seems like it would've been a huge upgrade for the French Navy.
@edsutherland8266
@edsutherland8266 Год назад
It’s a real shame, as the Jaguar was a real beauty. I especially liked the look of the radar equipped Indian variants. It’s sad the way the defence industry fought amongst themselves so much in that 50s-70s period of amalgamation. Some great aircraft manufacturers were lost, despite having strong products.
@eatthisvr6
@eatthisvr6 Год назад
has there been any post war jets that remained on or under budget over their lifetime?
@dzulkafleysamad3825
@dzulkafleysamad3825 Год назад
My favourite fighter jets in the 80s
@chandrachurniyogi8394
@chandrachurniyogi8394 9 месяцев назад
at the time Marine Nationale could have opted for the naval carrier borne A-6F Intruder (Block II) maritime multi role ground attack fighter . . . although it didn't have any internal cannon, but a provision was there to arm the A-6F with an internal cannon should it be necessary . . .
@alastairblair
@alastairblair Год назад
The unique position of the company making the plane not wanting it to be sold, ladies and gentlemen I give you, the French!
@CaptainLumpyDog
@CaptainLumpyDog Год назад
Ed, sounds like you’ve got a little goose green caught in your throat there, mate.
@LessAiredvanU
@LessAiredvanU Год назад
As far as I am aware, the Super Etendard was transonic when fully loaded and all types of Jaguar were supersonic.. so they chose a less capable aircraft
@dcanmore
@dcanmore Год назад
Jaguars had a very short combat range so the use of supersonic speeds on combat missions would have been unlikely considering deployment at sea meant carrying extra weight (drop tanks meant less armaments carried so less mission capacity). Etendards have a bigger wing area and Radar. Jaguars were in essence an excellent battlefield strike aircraft but too compromised for carrier strike. Hence the British didn't pursue the 'Sea' variant and preferred their Buccaneers.
@LessAiredvanU
@LessAiredvanU Год назад
@@dcanmore They would have only gone supersonic over target, just like the land based version. I would have suspected that fuel tanks would be carried on most operations, as they would only need one or two weapons for the task. One tank under the fuselage with one weapon under each wing, or - most likely - one weapon under the fuselage and fuel tanks on the wing pylon. The Super Etendard only carried one Exocet.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 Год назад
Getting a Jaguar M on to the deck of a Carrier was a nightmare!!! The Test Pilots reports from the Carrier trials absolutely slated the aircraft.
@randyhavard6084
@randyhavard6084 Год назад
I was hoping that the yellow citroën would be blown across the airfield by the jet blast top gear style
@owen368
@owen368 Год назад
You mean the tin snail?
@randyhavard6084
@randyhavard6084 Год назад
@@owen368 the 2CV
@owen368
@owen368 Год назад
@@randyhavard6084 Yep that the nickname for a 2CV tin snail seems very apt to me.
@alexandermathar7780
@alexandermathar7780 Год назад
Would have been interesting how a Jaguar M would have fared at Top Gun. I mean already the Land based jag performed brilliantly at Red Flag.
@hiho59ish
@hiho59ish 7 месяцев назад
A great potential.....apart from the fact it was embarrassingly underpowered when tooled up....
@eatthisvr6
@eatthisvr6 Год назад
i dread to think what that wouldve been like with an engine out! better than the f35 but not much lol
@jayasuriyas2604
@jayasuriyas2604 Год назад
There is a joke in the Indian airforce that jaguar only takes off because of Earth's curvature, still they love it tho. Bizarre that the French wanted a carrier plane out of it.
@mattewj1268
@mattewj1268 Год назад
The Super Etendard is a fine aircraft. However I do believe that the Sepecat Jaguar would have had more potential. However it was an orphan and Dassault was never going to nurture it the way it deserved.
@DanielLLevy
@DanielLLevy Год назад
The Super Etendard could do very little that an A4 Skyhawk couldn't, and at a much higher cost with no economy of scale whatsoever! As to the Jaguar, AFAIK it is still in service with the Indian Navy in the (ground-based) maritime attack role, with a radar fitted in its nose and AShCM's under its wings.
@mattewj1268
@mattewj1268 Год назад
@@DanielLLevy indeed but there's very good reasons to buy domestic.
@nidgem7171
@nidgem7171 Год назад
In a typical ' *sign of the times* ' ........... For a couple of decades now, nothing flies in or out of Bedford Airfield which is a giant car park for new, mostly imported, cars waiting despatch to dealerships.
@alexandermathar7780
@alexandermathar7780 22 дня назад
Let's combine the Jaguar M with the Indian DARIN III Upgrade.
@tankdriver67m64
@tankdriver67m64 Год назад
I always thought the Mirage F1 could have been developed into a carrier a/c
@joso5554
@joso5554 Год назад
Nope. Wayyy too high approach speed for deck landing.
@smarte.r.1450
@smarte.r.1450 Год назад
my fav crab cab after the Harrier ever made
@michaeldelucci4379
@michaeldelucci4379 Год назад
I have hope that Tamiya will create a one in 1/48th scale
@kennethhamilton5633
@kennethhamilton5633 6 месяцев назад
Did a bunch of Med cruises in the late 60s to mid 70s, crossdecked wirh the Ark Royal and saw Buccaneers, Jaguars, Rolls Royce Spey F4s, a quite different bird other than the airframe from US versions, oh and Bears, Badgers, Soviet frigates and hairy Soviet butts!!!! PS the buccaneers and jaguars were'nt shipboard they were land based and would over fly the carrier and put on airshows for us
@bentilbury2002
@bentilbury2002 Год назад
It would have served Dassault right if the French Navy had cancelled the Jaguar... and bought the Corsair!
@MrHws5mp
@MrHws5mp Год назад
They had a very serious look at the Skyhawk, even persuading two US test pilots who were on a promotional tour with hte aircraft in Europe to fly on and off one of the French carriers to prove it was possible. The Yanks were a bit nervous of the 'tiny' deck, being used to huge USN carriers!
@Pouncer9000
@Pouncer9000 Год назад
It doesn't make sense though, with Dassault owning Bréguet the company's in a win-win situation, they're selling whatever the French navy is buying? There's more to the story than that je pense..
@harryspeakup8452
@harryspeakup8452 Год назад
No, it;s a well-documented tale. For Dassault, Breguet was the enemy and they bought it in order to eliminate their domestic-market competitor
@RedXlV
@RedXlV Год назад
Marcel Dassault had a huge ego. The Jaguar was a plane he had no role in designing.
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 Год назад
Yes there is!!! The Jaguar M got slated by the guys testing it!!! It was a complete dog when trying to get it on the boat and that was what killed it.
@glennpettersson9002
@glennpettersson9002 Год назад
"To be Franc" I see what you did there 😂
@audacity60
@audacity60 Год назад
With the later 811 uprated Adour, the M could have been a great carrier aircraft.
@PanzerChicken69
@PanzerChicken69 6 месяцев назад
The first few images are from Hr Ms Karel Doorman (former HMS Venerable) Dutch Marines.
@thefrecklepuny
@thefrecklepuny Год назад
Would a navalised Mirage F-1M not have been better than the Jaguar M? More power, better handling and could have replaced both the F-5 and the Entendard over time.
@WanderfalkeAT
@WanderfalkeAT Год назад
Absolutely! And you could make it Multirole - Using it as Fighter, Interceptor and Bomber.
@animaltvi9515
@animaltvi9515 Год назад
Talking of sea going variants of RAF planes. I heard there was talk of a sea tornado. Still prefer the jaguar tho.
@stephenchappell7512
@stephenchappell7512 Год назад
Only in its fetus MRCA form
@rovercoupe7104
@rovercoupe7104 Год назад
At 5:26 a 2CV, so French. M.
@manmonkee
@manmonkee Год назад
Probably a stupid question but the Jaguar has only been out of sevice for a decade or so??, What happens to all those Jags?, i could think of a country that'd love some fast ground strike aircraft that can take off from rough ground.
@MrHws5mp
@MrHws5mp Год назад
All the British ones were scrapped, despite the RAF having spent most of the 1990s using and abusing the Urgent Operational Requirements system to get them comprehensively upgraded...🙄
@harryspeakup8452
@harryspeakup8452 Год назад
@@MrHws5mp No they weren't. Many, many remain in storage at Cosford
@katywalker8322
@katywalker8322 Год назад
@@harryspeakup8452 , thought a lot had been used as ground training airframes?
@MrHws5mp
@MrHws5mp Год назад
@@harryspeakup8452 Oh that's interesting. Any idea how many, and how many have been (presumably) rendered unflyable by being used as instructional airframes?
@richardvernon317
@richardvernon317 Год назад
@@MrHws5mp Butt load of them at Cosford, most are GR 1A's in RAF Germany Squadron Markings that haven't flown in nearly 40 years. The GR 3A's they have last flew in 2007 and have not had their engines run since 2016. GR 3's were almost life ex on airframe life when the aircraft was canned.
Далее
The Boeing Super Phantom; Making a Legend Even Greater
13:03
♀ 🔁 ♂ = ...❓ #OC #늦잠 #vtuber
00:12
Просмотров 1,4 млн
Phantom vs. Jaguar - Germany 1982
5:06
Просмотров 757 тыс.
French Swingers; The Dassault Mirage G
11:13
Просмотров 50 тыс.
Project GAMMA; Delta Force’s Black Sheep Sibling
13:13
Sea Sabres; The North American FJ Furys
13:17
Просмотров 78 тыс.
First of the V’s - The Vickers Valiant
11:45
Просмотров 79 тыс.
The Martin B-57G; Laid the Groundwork
13:33
Просмотров 115 тыс.
Калькулятор в iPadOS 18 ➕
0:38
Просмотров 146 тыс.
✅ЛУЧШИЕ фишки iOS 18🔥
0:51
Просмотров 109 тыс.
Неразрушаемый смартфон
1:00
Просмотров 792 тыс.
ТОП-5 культовых телефонов‼️
1:00