THE KING - SEVEN DEVILS 

I've been coming back to this video every month or so, it's such an amazing edit and an amazing movie of course

Impressed editing. Apply for Creative Media Funding Grants...you have talent, homie ((hugs))

Randomly Random yes!! Everyone in this movie is incredibly amazing!

@@natalielittle3 Ah that's my name🤣😂✌

Haven't seen IT get but i must the instinct forces me to like it

the french guy acts as british king while the british guy acts as french king.

Robert Pattinson character is cringe and disgusting. Sla, estranho. Poderia ser um vilão melhor

Ciel Trancy Thank you!! ❤️

He can't act that well, he's just been lucky with the movies.

@@vertigo2894 nah I disagree he was perfect in Dune

@@adrianhilltobar3690 His range is limited, his expressions are limited. He was far from "pefrect". Zandeya was better and that is saying something as she is a bland actress too. He just gets lucky with the movies. Probably slept with the right people.

thx king

Carmine Paradis thank you!!

THANK YOU!!!!

@@natalielittle3 NAHHH THANK YOUUU!! TIMMY T IS AMAZING SO HAPPY U DID AN AMAZING THING LIKE THAT

You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history. Let me educate you: 1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe 2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry 3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile. 4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity 5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France 6) France never tried to assassinat him. 7) he was the one, that declared war on France --------- 8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man 9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt. 10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health. 11) After the battle of Azincourt he threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night. 12) He asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive. -------- 10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais) 11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot more hard for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses. --------- 12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start 13) The english archers where not visible as the hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield 14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the direction of the french army (that caused a lot of causalities) 15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, cazsed a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed

@@Julien-yc3zy ok.... and?

@@Julien-yc3zy thank you for your “educating knowledge” but guess what...NO ONE CARES!!! I’m minoring in European history and I honestly could care less is someone gets facts wrong. It wasn’t made for educational purpose, it was made for fun and do shine light on a historical figure that does not get enough love. No historical movie is going to be completely accurate. Why don’t you spend your time on productive things instead of bashing others that could literally care less. 👏🏼Waste of time👏🏼

C’mon! Its’s just a movie! Not a historical documentary…

@@___s.t.e.l.l.a____9416 Ok, so USA did won in Vietnam war with Rambo.

True but it is a fictional adaptation of a fictional play. Still a great movie!

@@beccymay701 It's with this kind of shit that the young Brits think they are invincible!. They were heroic and victorious in Mons (1914/18) in Dunkirk (1939/45) and in Tobruk?

@@pierrefraisse8610 sweeping generalised statements about young Brits? Really? Whatever you think I don't think this film reflects particularly well on the English. I genuinely think you are being over-sensitive. This is a fictional film which is attempting to make a point about the toxicity of our institutions of power and how corrupting they are. Not about the "great" victory of the English over the French at Agincourt. I'm sorry if you don't realise that.