The King Tribute | The King Has No Friends 

U can be my friend

Dc5 Xploit cheers bruh

You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history. Let me educate you: 1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe 2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry 3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile. 4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity 5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France 6) France never tried to assassinat him. 7) he was the one, that declared war on France --------- 8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man 9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt. 10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health. 11) After the battle of Azincourt he threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night. 12) He asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive. -------- 10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais) 11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot more hard for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses. --------- 12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start 13) The english archers where not visible as the hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield 14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the direction of the french army (that caused a lot of causalities) 15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, cazsed a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed

@@Julien-yc3zy Let me educate you, there is something called the outdoors, maybe try it sometime.

@@dc5xploit913 let me educate you again: you can write long comments and spend a lot of time outside

@@Julien-yc3zy you’re facts are mostly wrong but you can believe in your own made up nonsense. And even if this movie was historically accurate the French would’ve been embarrassed even more, be happy that this disaster of a battle for the french wasn’t shown historically (couple hundred losses for the English about 6 thousand losses for the french.

You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history. Let me educate you: 1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe 2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry 3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile. 4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity 5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France 6) France never tried to assassinat him. 7) he was the one, that declared war on France --------- 8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man 9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt. 10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health. 11) After the battle of Azincourt he threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night. 12) He asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive. -------- 10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais) 11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot more hard for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses. --------- 12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start 13) The english archers where not visible as the hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield 14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the direction of the french army (that caused a lot of causalities) 15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, cazsed a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed

@@Julien-yc3zy Thanks for the education 😳😂

@@Julien-yc3zy But what if nobody cares, and just wants to enjoy a good movie?

@@Julien-yc3zy this is not a fictional film not a documentary. It is a story that Michod and Edgerton made to express something of the terrible nature of too much power lying in too few people's hands. Accept it for what it is. If you want historical accuracy go and watch a documentary.

You realise, that this film is a british propaganda and is constantly lying on historical facts in order to do some french bashing. In fact it couldn't be further away from reality. The Henry V portrayed in this movie is a insult to any man or woman that knows a bit about history. Let me educate you: 1) Henry V was a super violent savage to his people. He did not care a bit for the men that fought for him and treated them as badly as was possible in medieval Europe 2) He constantly violated the codes of chivalry 3) He was everything but an handsome young man. In fact he was a very ugly man and was stung in a war (before France) by an arrow (in 1403, battle of Shrewsbury, before his coronation) that severally disfigured him on his right cheek. That's also the reason why there is only 1 representation of him and that it only shows his left profile. 4) Historians (including british historians), describe Henry V as one of the most agressive and devious products of a time of violence and duplicity 5) He was never provoked by France, as shown in the movie. He started assembling his army a long time before invading France 6) France never tried to assassinat him. 7) he was the one, that declared war on France --------- 8) The french king was a very pious and discret 18 year old man 9) He kept himself far from battlefields because of his poor health. He was not even there in Azincourt. 10) He died a few weeks after Azincourt because of his very poor health. 11) After the battle of Azincourt, Henry V threatened his soldiers to cut of their ears if any sound was to be heard in the night. 12) Henry V asked every prisoner to be killed after the battle. His men didn't want to follow his cruel orders, but finally 20 men accomplished his wishes. 2000 prisoner where killed by axes and masses in the head or burned alive. -------- 10) In the movie the English troops are shown to be all foot soldiers, which is completely wrong because in reality they where nearly all mounted on horses. In fact is the Azincourt campaign was a chase between France and England. The british started at Harfleur (Normandy), the french started at Rouen (Normandy) and it ended as we all know in Azincourt (Pas-de-Calais) 11) In reality the siege of Harfleur was a lot harder for the English as portrayed in the movie. 400 french soldiers fought no less than 11.300 English soldiers for more than 1 month. The English tried to attack the castle by attacking trough tunnels and the french attacked them by doing counter tunnels which led to fierce underground battles. Besides that, the french went out many times (of the castle) to attack the English. The English lost more than 2.000 men and the french around 140 men. 2.000 additional English soldiers had to go back to England after the siege because of injuries and illnesses. --------- 12) At Azincourt, the french have never been on the top of the hill, because the English where on the hill, which is a tactical better place (especially for bows). So the english had the advantage from the start 13) The english archers where not visible as they hided in the woods on the side of the battlefield 14) Because of the mud and the arrows that came from each side, chaos started amongst the french knights. their horses panicked and fled in the opposite direction (to the french army, which caused the french a lot of causalities) 15) Very few french knight where able to attain the english army. Those who did, caused a lot of damage to the english and the personal guard of the King was nearly entirely killed

@@Julien-yc3zy Didn’t ask

@@KianRileyAustinZAYN but now you know

@@Julien-yc3zy What if no one cares, and literally just wants to enjoy a good movie?

@@Julien-yc3zy pls stfu, Its a great Movie Not gonna lie! Its just a movie and Not a doku..