henri and francis pellissier 1924: (after abandoning due to a fight on the road with henri desgrange over rules regarding clothing removal, showed the reporter a case of pills rattling around) "in short, we run on dynamite"
Contador later mentioned how he trusted nobody on the team except for his personal mechanic. They had to store his bikes in the hotel room to prevent potential sabotage.
Alberto also had to use his brother's help to get back to his hotel after the race. Even Lance Drugstore playing al his sadistic games didn't keep Contador back all that much.
@@andredeketeleastutecomplex he didn't need to do anything when your the greatest in the world. When your not, you can too! show others your NOT. He's a clown....
I read that Greg Lemond had to do something similar in '86. Sometimes your teammates; not rival cyclists or the course itself are your biggest obstacles...
oldtwins na I would call that a hostile work environment. That would suck.
7 месяцев назад
This movie is unreal. It doesn't tell what really happened in team Astana. That Contador has won this Tour almost on his own, with just one mechanic he could trust. The rest of the team, lead by Armstrong and Bruyneel, were against him, showing really low life, intimidating behaviour. So cool that Contador succeeded, despite all the shit from Armstrong cs.
The funny story is... it is tradition that the winner of the TdF buy his teammates a gift for their work. Contador bought watches, he delivered the watch to Lance at the next year's TdF. Lance was on the team bus and refused to meet Contador to accept the watch. Contador could have sent it to him... but he wanted to look Lance in the eyes and let him know he kicked his ass.
@@tom2038 I do, cheats have no place in sports, anyone who does not dope is a better cyclist that Armstrong! That includes club cyclists! Armstrong is a twat!
Me too. While I watched here and there, this was my first full TdF I saw from beginning to end. Made me a true fan to this day, and an avid cyclist too. I have to thank my son for watching this! For some reason, at his young age he had a liking to the race and I was hooked, and have been since. Only cycling makes endurance events exciting to watch. Even the media battle between Lance and Alberto was awesome on that Tour. Very well done documentary, BTW. I feel it explains well for the casual fan too.
@Christy Dolan yes you do have a point. The funny thing is I really hated both lance and Alberto and we all knew they were cheats, everybody knew, this was so common, that even people who didn't watch TDF knew... but what I get goosebumps over is the drama and the small stabs when talking to the press, which is rare today, this fights are moved to Twitter and even in interviews they'll have staff with then to hold their hands
Sometimes the stronger teammate doesn't win because of the team's strategy. Like Contador, Lemond was the better/stronger rider in the 1985 TDF. However, Lemond followed/obeyed the La Vie Claire's team strategy and allowed Hinault to win his fifth TDF.
By the start of the 2009 Tour de France, Contador had won the previous three grand tours he had entered, along with many other races, and he was strong enough to win the 2009 Tour without full team support. But you think he should have followed/obeyed the team strategy when Armstrong hadn't won a road race since 2005? He was getting screwed by Bruyneel and Astana, so he turned the tables.
What's funny as hell is that this was absolutely Lance's downfall. If he just left well enough alone and retired the first time and didn't try to come back and prove he was better than Contador (first w Astana then w Radio Shack), the 2010 US Federal investigation, the only one that stuck, would have never happened. Some people don't know when to quit while they're ahead.
You're absolutely right. But Lance came away a better person for having been found out and dragged through the mud. He needed to be caught for his own good.
@Concrete Head No, I'm not joking. People do fucked up shit. People can be real assholes. And if they get away with it they have no reason to change. He got himself caught, which was the catalyst for change, for the better. Have you listened to his podcasts or follow what he's been up to these days? Or do you look at it through the lens of the mainstream media like most people who continue to bash on the guy do?
I was fortunate enough to film Contador recently while he was in Texas of all places and he had nothing but complimentary things to say about Lance both on screen and off. He seemed to really be motivated by Lance.
I was this when the drama was unfolding on TV. And it still gets my heart racing. I know they were doped all the way silly back then, and still use whatever they can to ease pain and help them go faster. But man, some dramatic races.
Contador won the tour by himself, the entire team including the director were supporting lance, even Lance said:if he rides physically as good as he did in 2009 and can be controlled by a team director who makes the decisions instead of him--he'll be almost impossible to beat.
@@indonesiaamerica7050 no revisionism . Doping is contrary to the spirit of sport. Lance broke those rules and went on an unprecedented run with doping. His rivals also doped , thus no winner could be declared. The races were void from a GC point of view . What we saw were freak show exhibitions and people like you (weee you even into cycling back then ? Were you even born ? ) There we’re enough knowledgeable people who didn’t believe that cancer boy would be a genuine GC contender, especially when he never shown potential before cancer
Contador’s acceleration and burst was just too explosive for everyone during his prime. Even Lance admitted on air he wasn’t following that back then. Alberto will always be a special cyclist to me. Gifted, talented, and such a class act.
In their prime Lance could have handled Contador. I’m talking the US Postal days. I’m not taking anything away from Contador though as he was awesome in his own right. Both in their absolute prime would have been the greatest TDF’s ever.
Clearly he was not a class act as he was not about team. He screwed the team and Kloeden destroyed any chance for Kloeden to hit top 3. Spanish weasel is more likely the case.
Nah, I watched that Tour every day. Lance wasn’t as strong as Alberto, even though the whole Astana team was working for Lance, Alberto was far stronger.
You must be kidding. Armstrong were far stronger and better than Contador when they both were in their prime. Contador was only stronger than the old Armstrong. And yes, I watched just about it all from the 90`s until today. And I personally have been in cycling.
@@Norwegian733 why don't you read comments before writing? He clearly wrote "I watched that Tour every day, Lance wasn't as strong as Alberto..."; he isn't kidding - he is telling the truth, in this TdF Armstrong was not even close to Contador fitness. Nobody talks about other TdF's or the 90`s.........
@Robert Trageser Yeah, Indurain never had any suspicion over him, and actually neither did his big rivals like Bugno, Chiapucci or Rominger. The 96 Tour when he was thoroughly beaten by Rijs and the rest, was proven to be totally drug addled. I don't know, Indurain had a privileged body for cycling, his lung capacity was out of this world and he was one of the smartest riders out there in terms of preserving energy. He did not dominate every single time trial and mountain stage like Lance did. But yes, I suspect he was also on something. I don't think any human can run a 3 week race like that at those speeds just eating pasta and not have a bad day along the way, but I am no sport scientist.
@@billbobaggins801 i don't think it would be easy to find a rider any where on earth, from any generation, that worked harder or was more focused and determined than Lance Armstrong. Im from Europe and i respect Armstrongs sheer desire to destroy anything (or anyone) that gets in his way. Regardless of what he did and how he treated people, i can still draw inspiration from him. Anywaze Mr. Billbo Baggins, i hope that you are well and good!
in those days rivalry was present in some teams,especially Astana,and that was more intense,and created more expectations for the race itself and for the general public,wich was good.
Rui.....Yep, the rivalry sure made the early stages of the race VERY interesting. Personally I was pulling for Lance, and really wanted to see him in yellow again, but jeez things must have been incredibly awkward within the Astana team.
Armstrong was greedy, he should have stayed retired and maybe he would have never been caught but his ego got the best of him and finally justice was made and even though everyone was doping at the time the french and Europeans in general weren't going to let an american win that many tours.
He always would have been caught. The US government stepped in because his team used government funds back in the day (US Postal). All 'cycling insiders' knew there was epo since the beginning of the 90s in general. My brother used to race, very low level though. But even there and then, everyone kind of knew the deal (talking beginning 90's). It had nothing to do with France or America. Armstrong (probably) won fair and square. His luck just ran out. Although I read he's doing podcasts now, I doubt he'll end up poor.
Lance will never say I got beat doesn’t matter if you were a better doper than him or if you were a foot ahead of him he is so messed up it does not matter I hope he can find peace
What an absolute garbage human. He thinks the world revolves around him. Typical american arrogance. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that it will be kinda suspicious to return to top form after 4 years break at age 37.... Lance Dopestrong, American Hero!
You either die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain. Lance had already died, but decided to come back and watch his world fall apart.
Armstrong was told by the Dr who helped him dope that without drugs he would never win a tour with his physiology and would only be an average rider. I raced in the 80s and Alberto was totally in a different class and such a nice guy, not a narcissistic bully like Armstrong. Armstrong threw riders off of his team if they refused to dope.
@@indonesiaamerica7050 If I remember correctly the claim was actually made by Greg LeMond in private discussions with David Walsh after one of the doctors who provided Armstrong's experimental cancer treatment inadvertently divulged Lance's VO2 max number. The number in question although high enough to make Armstrong a professional athlete wasn't even close for him to be competitive on the climbs of TdF. In a movie called "The Program" based on the book "Seven Deadly Sins" by David Walsh they chose to drop Greg LeMond from the story and reworked the scene so it was dr. Ferrari who told Lance that it meant "he was born to lose" before starting him on the eponymous program of scientific doping. In terms of grand tour peloton Armstrong was a middle of the pack rider who couldn't climb. Before scientific and strategic blood doping and use of steroids to improve recovery masterminded by Michelle Ferrari gave him a completely new physiology he was just a one day racer even though he was already taking all the stuff that the top European riders were taking at the time. He was still vulnerable during his first TdF wins, so he bolstered his team with top talent and got all of them on the same doping program so they could carry and protect him in the mountains.
@@indonesiaamerica7050 well before EPO he competed in four tours and ‘did not finish’ three. It depends on your definition of average I guess but he didn’t show signs of being a potential GC leader before the EPO
@@HkFinn83LOL. Look up Cyrille Guimard. You have no idea what EPO is nor what anyone does to plan a life around success in sports. You just repeat nonsense that you picked up. Inane gossip.
@@rh_BOSS Greg Lemond does not understand anything well enough to explain it to high school students. He spoke nothing but BS about his supposed medical problems after getting shot. He doesn't even know what his ADR team injected him with when he repeated his vitamin injections stories. And you distorted his childish gossip about Armstrong. Modern urban legends rather than trying to figure out what evidence you have or even what is plausible or even possible at all.
The comeback was literally the beginning of his end. If he never came back, none of the people would have talked, the bodies would have remained buried. But because he couldn't leave well enough alone, he paid the price.
Obsession & his own jealousy was his greatest demise! He already knew he was the best pure climber In history of the Tour, but to not only be jealous of the up & coming Cantador, It was far too difficult to see someone else hoisting the crown other than himself. His cannibalistic ways caught up to him, BUT HE Never admittedly under oath stated he used doping as a means to gain & keep advantages over his foe.
Well to be fair to Lance, it's a poor comparison because we're comparing a 37 year old Lance, who hasn't raced competitively for 4 years, against a much younger Contador, at the peak of his powers. All said and done - if we leave the doping to one side (and they both had Tour de France titles taken away), then Lance has won 7, and Contador 3.
@@JimChap Contador also won the Giro and Vuelta. Races Lance did not even race. Contador was the better racer. If you total Grand Tour wins (giving each their DQed races becasue Lance would have none without them) it is Contador 9 Lance 7.
@@Sills71 It is the TDF at issue here not any minor races Stupid and fool. You may win all other world races including TDF but it is TDF that will make one the better cyclist.
Nice finding! Currently I have a OneUp dropper post that I use for winter. I keep my Rockshox AXS for summer. I got also the fox transfer. I wonder how is the Vertical Helium Dropper Post from Spain.
It’s amazing how most comments of this have zero reference that any doping took place and this was an amazing battle between someone in their 20s vs some near their 40s
Lance armstrong was the athlete that made me grow up. I no longer looked at athletes for inspiration or admired them. Theyre just humans. Theyre not titans like i believed as a kid.
There's nothing wrong with looking up to athletes or sports heroes. And that's because there's nothing wrong with using drugs in sport, it's actually the sensible thing to do and is better for your body. I think Lance Armstrong was a legend and still is. A true winner.
20:16 - i know that im super old and super cynical but it does make me chuckle when people in cycling talk about honour or morality or the 'spirit' of the race.
@@goo5976 Yeah. He is right. Some of the fans just don't want to know. People who still believe in clean professional sports probs also still believe in Santa and the tooth fairy. Kinda adorable.
Contador was as big a doper as Lance. Heck he was on Lance's team. And the idea that Lance caused others to dope is a joke. From Indurain on cycling was a rolling pharmacy.
They were doping in Le tour from its inception in one way or another All the 5 times club are gonna have been juiced to the gills, lance was just the best at it
Problem with lance was his narcissism that ruined other people’s lives for his transgression. No one did more to taint a sport than LA at the expense of others.
Heidi Karinen Doping was in the sport long before Armstrong came along. He was just playing the European cycling game as it already existed. If the sport had been clean from the beginning, Armstrong would have competed clean. He was playing their game. Most American pro cyclists have stated they never doped until they went to Europe. And the last few years, they rarely doped. It had gotten just too difficult for them to get away with.
The differences are not that great. Only in the long Tours do you have doping as a major factor. The drugs do not make anyone stronger. They help manage recovery so that your naturally developed strength can be restored in time to meet the challenges of the events raced. For modern tour specialists it also helps prepare outside of the racing circuits because their form is easier to predict in terms of timing the training and rest cycles. Before the hematocrit tests there are stories of "massive" increases in peak power (over one to two hours). But that period lasted for only a few years and Lance was an amateur at that time. They started doing hematocrit "health checks" shortly after riders started dying at statistically unlikely rates from heart attacks. The same is true with testosterone and even corticoids. The levels that they can get away with (sometimes) using just aids recovery. Their form is only marginally better because it's marginally more predictable when they can attack the time trials and mountain stages without destroying their fitness (when short term recovery is compromised) on subsequent stages.
Greg LeMond retired because he wasn't prepared to start doping in the early 1990's. Which is what he would have had to do if he'd wanted to stay competitive. Even Fignon did the same thing, because he wasn't going to start taking EPO and HGH.
He should have stayed in retirement. He probably would still have his name next to those 7 victories. No one ever showed up at the Tour with his level of focus, will to win at all costs and preparation.
@@TobiasImmerstein-tm3gp Yeah, I mean Contador won despite having his own team against him that year! Both riders AND team manager! Who ever had to overcome such a hurdle?
@Robert Trageser I remember when that unnamed person claimed number 7. I ripped all the Campy Drivetrain off my bike and got a new SRAM Force 10-speed setup. I figured if it was good enough for unnamed number 7 it was good enough for me. I'm not really sorry because it turns out to be better for gravel bikes but I wouldn't have done it otherwise.
@Firsthgyhgyhuy Lastujhujhuj I saw Alberto Contador in Madrid, it was a Dinner Engagement. It was through a friend's company and I didn't have any relation to anybody there, but fun. He doesn't look the same in person but I didn't get terribly close. He was doing autographs but there was a long line. I guess I should have gotten him to sign my 2006 Liberty Seguros Würth.
After 3 years off and at 37 I think you'll find it was incredible that he made that podium. Contador's last podium on a Grand Tour was made in 2015 when he was 32. So from age 32 onward Contador was incapable of making podium in a 3 week major race.
Contador vs. Armstrong... Contador 3 Giro wins, 3 TdF wins... (plus 4th 5th and 9th), 3 Vuelta wins (plus 2x 4th)... Armstrong 7 TdF wins.. never raced the Giro or Vuelta... 9 Grand Tours vs. 7... plus Contador won Paris Nice 2x... Tirreno 1x and Tour or Basque 4 times... Clearly Contador was the better stage racer.
Fail x2, Lance world Road race champion 1993, a good few stage race wins, many stage wins @ TDF against other banned during their career dopers, beat them with a whooping Contador twice banned Operacion Puerto, & the dodgy Beef & Lance rode well in the Giro 2009, use the internet a tad more, Contadoper vs Pharmstrong same age same we will never know, 37 vs 26 in 2009 old vs young
hi i am 16 year old i've bin going around and asking some cyclist for help im a jamaican cyclist i had a crash and i need some help to fix my bike or to get a bike so if you can help me in anyway it will be good thank you
This was la Vie Claire part 2,only with much more doping.Both Astana leaders been caught,Leipheimer confessed,Kloden has clouds over him during his days at Telekom alongside Jan Ullrich
@@calinmarian98 I thought the same until I learned he used the same 'doctor' as Lance, Roche etc. I tend to believe he was clean when he won, things do change. But still he's on a list no one wants to be on.
@@calinmarian98 I believe Andy was clean - I'm saying that as he was a consistent rider and disnt have peaks and troughs. Excellent climber, his Time Trialling was a weak link. He'd have won 1 or 2 TdF is that was better. Frank had a 'minor' dismeanour later in his career, not sure what and how that all panned out but he got suspended.
@@serotta50 he is the one who signed onto a team that already had a clear #1 rider. Then acts like a child when it's time to support Contador. Cycling is a team sport.
The biggest factor of Lance winning al those years (mostly the last three) was having a team that was focused on the tour, and the tour only. How Postal/discovery controlled the tour from start to finish was quite phenomenal. Bigger budget, better focus, better bikes, better domestiques, less focus on getting points in the rest of the season. They tried it again in '09, but everyone saw those times were about to change..
At 32:11, Lance says "I've got seven of them at home." This sums up his lousy attitude. He's only okay with not being the best because he's won 7 times. Sore loser. Can't just be happy for his teammates. He has to put in a word about his past successes.
@@The-Real-Spaniard Contador doped. Pantani doped. Ulrich doped. Mercx doped. Everybody did. Even with that in your system, you still have to work your ass and train like a crazy idiot.
Contador wasn’t in the same league as Lance. They all were doping but lance was a far better and mentally stronger rider than anyone of that era. Best Tour de France rider ever. Vive Lance Armstrong 💪🏽❤️
In a era where everyone was doping...wonder why everyone hates Lance? The vast majority of the sport was doping and y'all gonna hate on one man because he was successful...gimme a break! Lance was a beast, doping or not. If it was a clean sport, he would have still been the best...he was just the best of everyone doping as well. Where he was an asshole was ruining other careers over defending the doping...thats where I lost respect.
All the big hitters throughout cycling history have doped, Merckx, Moser, Hinault, Indurain etc etc No-one wants to hit on those giants despite people like Merckx getting caught and subsequently being DQ'd from three of the big races incl the TdF!
a dose of reality for you : LA in his first three TDF's : DNF----DNF ----36th place........Lance was average at best before he doped.......Greg Lemond outclasses Armstrong as a man and a cyclist. One is honorable, the other is a corrupt narcissist
@@richardgaines1647 So you are compairing non doped cyclists versus doped cyclists and comes to the conclusion that the non doped cyclists is an average cyclist, great comparison!
@@richardgaines1647 DNF, DNF and 36th place...against an entire peleton that was on the juice...c'mon man...don't cherry pick facts. Yes his first three TDF weren't good...but that was against everyone that was doping. Once on the juice, like everyone else, he was dominant.
Lance should never have come out of retirement. And then to be shown he clearly wasn't as strong as Contador, I completely can't understand why he then went to radio shack instead of going back into retirement. Ego I suppose.
He formed Team Radio-Shack, all of his fanboy nut-hugers followed him, entire team Astana! Just goes to show what Contador had to fight against in 2009. Ego is helluwadrug, and EPO is hell of a drug too.
That Lance was off the Pro Tour for three years and decides to come back and does the TDF and gets on the podium is as impressive as having cancer and coming back for a win.
By NO means does Alberto Contador compare to Lance Armstrong.. Hands Down. I watched them both ride for many years. Lance Armstrong put the Tour de France, as a sport on the WORLD wide map. Once Lance no longer rode the Bicycle circuit: The popularity of Bicycle races dis appeared.
I understand that perspective, but I see it differently. Though to imply that he has achieved no more than you in the sport of cycling is just nonsense. The 7 yellow jerseys are still up in his house & he's proud of them. He did what he had to do, and what everyone else was doing, to win. It's not his fault the sport was the way it was. He had 2 choices: to go home, or stay and play the game. What would you have done, go home or settle for mediocrity?
Great stuff. Thanks for sharing. It's always great to see the beauty bicycles that they rode back then. The Disc brakes really spoilt the good look of the bicycles. it truly is the biggest gimmick in the history of bicycles. it is really sad.
As we approach the line It's E.P.O. out in front closely followed by H.G.H. with T.U.E. gaining fast, H.G.H. beginning to flag a little now and T.U.E. moves confidently into second but he's been spotted by E.P.O. H.G.H falling back will have to settle for third place, T.U.E makes his attack but has he got enough to take E.P.O. it's gonna be close and IT'S E.P.O, E.P.O. TAKES IT, T.U.E. in second, H.G.H in third and EVERYONE FUCKING LOSES.
chris1275cc that’s brilliant!! Where did cortisone finish?? It’s crazy. Did any of the riders in the race back in the late 90’s to mid 00’s era ride clean?? And what about now??
@@mrkipling2201 cortisone finished way back but his teammate blood doping finished in 5th, closely followed by anabolic steroids and testosterone. In answer to your questions: Ironically it is Lance "we, need to fall in love with cycling again" Armstrong who likes to spread the rumour that "everyone was doing it" as it severs his narrative in truth there were likely many who rode clean. The real question is did any clean rider ever achieve anything back then? Well, Greg LeMond maybe although he was just before it got bad, Chris Boardman I suspect rode clean as he came from the track and he did well exactly where you expected him to, but I wouldn't bet my life on it. Today who knows, but when I see some riders who look positively anorexic it is hard to believe, they will tell you things like "It's about aerodynamics and power to weight ratio now" but then you see riders spend more time on the hoods and out of the saddle in the least areo position they can be in and putting down power that their muscle mass has no answer for.
chris1275cc I forgot about our old friend anabolic steroids!! Finished strongly eh?? And I agree with you I would say that Greg lemond raced clean and boardman did as well. I would say it is definitely a lot cleaner now than it was in the late 90’s era.
@@mrkipling2201 If I was forced to give an opinion I would say that it is cleaner today, now it seems to revolve around the science of "body hacking" using strict diets and legal (ish) substances and supplements, and team tactics (with a few dubiously prescribed T.U.E's thrown in) but they wont talk about that as it sounds an awful lot like doping. So Ironically it is still about who has access to the best doctors. The riders all look the same, ride the same, the bikes all look the same, if it wasn't for the odd rider like Peter Sagan I'd probably stop watching.
chris1275cc totally agree. I would say it’s a lot cleaner than it was due to advanced sciences and other natural resources. Although some of the TUE’s are definitely questionable.
There is no proof of that. The only proof is that Contador destroyed Armstrong, won 7 GT (9) and Armstrong 0 (7 if you want count). Then Contador won more than Armstrong in any case.
Say what you want about Lance but you don’t attack your teammate who is now in yellow (race lead) on the road. If I had done that while racing back in the day, I would’ve had a punch in the face after the race was over.