The LGM-35A Sentinel The Next Generation U.S. Air Force Nuclear Weapons 

Zero fucks given, Sir! 🫡

Many of our Military Alert Facilities (where the key turners sit) have wall are saying just that.

🤣☄️

😢

Self-destroction?? no we are made of love, i can prove you how love we are made, last day my dog lick my feet to wake me up this morning, you can seee we are made of love all of us

Likely because it doesn't matter to the US. The United States is so far from potential enemies that there would be adequate time to respond to any Russian or Chinese threat. Meanwhile Russia has NATOon its doorstep.

Fuel consumption for rocket 🚀 would make it to heavy for mobile unit.

Its detrimental to US military planner to establish more silo and mobile launcher for potential first strike targets the remaining 450 minuteman lll is for strategic retaliatory strike 70% of offensive strategic weapons are installed in an SLBM Trident D5

We do but they are on submarines. We are far from other borders so medium range land based missiles are useless

The usaf did develop the mobile MX in the 1980s. They never deployed the MX because of funding problem.

There's always been nukes at the ready from land, air, and sea so it would be impossible to avoid a retaliation. That's the nuclear triad.

No? Nuclear triad. Icbms have longer ranges and can be ready to launch at any moment. Like slbms.....

US ICBMs are many and located in middle of nowhere. Enemy have to use great part of his nuclear capacity to destroy them so less nukes left for cities

​@@salekondrejRussia has 6,250 nuclear warheads and hundreds of ICBMs, there's enough for everyone, you don't have to worry.

@@nguyenhung-mm4jr but by far not all on SLBM and ICBM. The latest stated numbers I could find from 2022 are 1185 ICBM warheads and 800 SLBM warheads. Most of them, ICBM warheads are on mobile platforms, which are very vulnerable. If they aren't dispersed like right now their base can easily be saturated with 2 or 3 warheads, if they are dispersed the whole area would be so big it can't be defended against a multi axis MIRV attack. They are almost escalatory vulnerable because they would be lost in any attack. Also, to add to the SLBM warheads, some SSBN are always in repair and disarmed at that time, so around 600 are deployed at any time. Russia still boosts a lot of tactical nuclear weapons, which isn't surprising given their conventional shortcomings.

Specifications are classified.

Yeah because the US airforce is just gonna give out the specs of their cutting edge icbm to everyone, good idea bro

Don't worry your buddy putin keep talking it's gonna be one on his front doorstep

mach 25 is slow in genocide Serbia?

Whether they have 24 or 100...no body will win. Nuclear weapons once used will destroy everything period. Russia cannot stop all nuclear missiles launched at them and neither can the U.S. Simple as that.

Dude watch (binkovs) video on USA vs Russia nuclear war. We have them outgunned. We have more icbm missiles than Russia. Russia has more aircraft launched cruise missiles. Either way we could launch 1/5 of our missiles and completely destroy Russia

Also sarmat is still in development and probably will not be made in any numbers.

The US has nuclear cruise missiles 🔥

America already has medium range trident missiles that can carry up to fifteen nuclear warheads. Each Ohio class submarine can carry twenty four trident missiles as well as a hundred and fifty four nuclear capable tomahawk missiles, and at least 3 of these subs are already stalking north Russian coastlines. If Russia launches the Sarmat we’ll have hundreds of missiles to counter them and send straight into Moscow.

Yes it's a ICBM

@@ChandranPrema123 so they are uselees as russians have thousands of s400

Probably, but I think the idea with MIRVs is that it's hard to shoot each warhead once they split from the main missile.

@@jarek1370 just like russian ones

@@JACKAL747 they have hipersonic missles