The Logistics of Ancient Empires 

You should give them an old fashioned decimation.

you are not the leader

oh i forgot

I'm gonna use this to not collapse Roman Empire again

did it still arrive in time or was it too late to be helpfull?

Literally feels like forever

​@@sizanogreen9900 it's never too late to change

​@@frankwalker5921 nah mate, mine already collapsed

Hahaha

Yeah, they built the Chunnel

Roman ingenuity

I assume this was after their successful campaign against the sea

Not ancient time period but perhaps ancient technology

Lucky 🍀

And yet they still managed to create the largest canal in the world without modern technology.

Actually they werent as spread out as rome

@@rateeightx That technically comes right around the so-called Darkened Middle Age in Europe, which basically means nothing to the otherwise short lived Sui Dynasty and the succeeding Golden Age-regarded Tang Chinese and their inspired Korean and Japanese neighbors.

It did exist and was one of the reasons Yemen at that point was particularly rich. Also would change hands between the Aksumites, Yemeni and Iran a few times.

It did (though it also included significant portion of east Africa and much of south east asia). This was the naval equivalent of the silk road, and was actually much more expansive, wealthier and continuous

This was the Erythrean Sea (Red Sea/Indian Ocean) trade route, good bit different from the Silk Road as it was far more focused on India/East Africa with Yemen and Oman being the safe midpoints, although Silk Road goods definitely did get transported along it too.

I would say it’s actually quite a bit easier. The carthaginians mainly conquered trading posts, ones that they would travel to and back by boat. They simply owned a city here and there on the coast while the Romans owned an entire landmass they needed messengers and local lords and such to administrate effectively.

🤨

Yeah. No animals to ride means you can't travel across the continent as fast which limits your communication with the rest of the tribes so they all remained isolated instead of forming any sort of union. No domesticated animals means food production is much MUCH lower. This led to farming never really catching on so they mostly remained as hunter gatherers. This means much smaller families which means no major population growth and no major development needed to keep up with the population.

@@genericwhitemale9566 "This led to farming never really catching on so they mostly remained as hunter gatherers.". Yes, this was a big part. Eventually farming did happen but no where near on the scale of what Euroasia did. In part the reason farming didn’t grow more regardless of not having animals to plow - they had little means to transport the food! So while Eurosia had lots of trade in food and metal, bulk item trade in the new world was too difficult. And there aren’t many good river systems in the new world. Mexico where the biggest population was has no good navigable rivers. South America has few good navigable rivers and the biggest river is Amazon which is in a terrible location since the Amazon isn’t good for farming or living. Incas were up in the mountain where rivers are small and not useful. The only good set of navigable rivers is in what is now the US. But they were mostly just hunter gather civilizations so bulk trade wasn’t important to them. If the Mexico and south american tribes had rivers like those in the US, they would have had far more use for it. I’m a little surprised that they didn’t use sea trade more often. > means no major population growth and no major development needed to keep up with the population Well, they did have a handful of major cities but the first to break 100k wasn’t until around 400AD while the old world may have broken 100k about 2,500 years earlier in 2100BC and certainly reached it by 1200BC (1600 years before new world). At the time the Spanish arrived, that area now known as Mexico city had 140k-200k people and believed to be one of the top 3 cities outside of China/India.

Mongol Empire exist during middle age not ancient

@@fathirizzanzahrano.r6161 good point 👍🏻

Mongols at the height of Rome were once Eastern Barbarians known as the Xianbei

I think it's more "Who wouldn't join the KhAnubis discord server?", If you replace the 'v's in "QVIS" and "IVNGERE" with 'u's (How they'd be spelled in modern Latin) google gives you something similar to that, And if you swap it and ask it for "Who wouldn't join the KhAnubis Discord Server" or "Who doesn't join the KhAnubis Discord Server" in Latin it gives you something fairly similar. From personal experience Google Translate isn't too good for Latin, But I think this is accurate as "Quis" and "Iungere" are related to Italian words I know with similar meaning (And actually to the English words "Who" and "Join").

Yeah, a publican.

it was an EU4 joke as in the same segment he used EU4 trade good icons whereever he could, including the one for "Spices" which unfortunatly does in fact display chilli peppers.

@@sizanogreen9900 aaaah I see,I never played a EU game.good to know.thanks

Divide et Impera

Bro thinks that he's first