The Longest Bridge In The World 

Brunei darussalam have 30km bridge

@@ziqpiano1968 Built by Chinese?

TBH that's just because China builds a lot of HSRs. Second place is actually the Taiwan HSR (although GWR apparently doesn't count it?)

@@johndaily9869 yeah. Brunei bridge are built by chinese

@@Rex-ww4cw sarcasm?

Doctors r more important

Yeah you live in a cave and when you get fever go to a doctor.

Use GOOGLE😅

I only see it on RU-vid but I’m gonna have to agree with this comment cause I wanna ride Hong Kong 🇭🇰 subway ❤️❤️💪🏾

NY subway is over 100 year old!

China kong🇨🇳🇨🇳

What is ny subway 🙄

@@chinescarioca and its still pretty trash

It was more like 5 ...

T•h•a•n•k••y•o•u••g•u•y•s••f•o•r••y•o•u•r••c•o•m•m•e•n•t••a•m••g•o•i•n•g••t•o••r•e•f•e•r•r•e••y•o•u••t•o••m•y•t•r•a•d••e•e•x•p•e•r•t• W•@•s•p•p• +=1=9=7=2=5=3=4=7=0=1=2=>

Lol

Useless Macau-HK Bridge bearly no one uses except people who want to head to airport from Macau, public transport buses, and maybe more privileged with own car. People will still stick with Ferry no matter what as it's more convenient for locals to inner HK and Macau. China is up to no good.

Same

Same

A uuu

A uuu

Yes but still not any other thing happened I known they want to build ram setu again...

Have they finished building toilets?

@@nothing9220 oh! So you are saying this with your old 2000&2010 data... For your kind information almost 90%have toilets or more than 90. So pls stop saying nonsense without proper information and accurate data

@@abhayprasad9580 yup over 90% of the Indian population has access to toilets.

@@nothing9220 has china stopped making viruses and occupying land of other countries?

you mean minutes? Those trains may be fast, but 300 km per minute is not believable :)

@@ehombane I have no ide what I wanted to say with that comment. I'm usually quite good at telling minutes and seconds apart, though ;-)

T•h•a•n•k••y•o•u••g•u•y•s••f•o•r••y•o•u•r••c•o•m•m•e•n•t••a•m••g•o•i•n•g••t•o••r•e•f•e•r•r•e••y•o•u••t•o••m•y•t•r•a•d••e•e•x•p•e•r•t• W•@•s•p•p• +=1=9=7=2=5=3=4=7=0=1=2=

Yes there was. It surrendered once Hong Kong was given to the red government.

Cost too much for underground solutions

Not viable

It’s china they don’t give a fuck about The environment, no matter what the state owned media says

Vraiment 🤔?

How scary was it?

China should stop imprisoning and killing innocent people, trying to control portions of Africa, and constantly projecting it’s sinister influence across the world.

The depth of the sea is too much for current technology.

Err not exactly. Ask any Honky ~ out of earshot of the thought police ~ whether they'd prefer to be just another province of China or to go back to the dynamic business oriented economic success that was Hong Kong and you can guess what their answer will be. The fact that it was run by Britain was instrumental only so far as Great Britain is a western civilised democratic country. It could have been any number of others, don't you see?

So it would be impressive only if there is any technology breakthrough? No, the sheer level of scale involved in building such a massive piece of infrastructure is a breakthrough in itself. Look, you can hate china as much as you like but you'll not take away the fact that they are "builders". That's what they do. They build the great wall, an impressive feat even compared to the egyptian pyramids which are hailed as a marvel in the west; that's a 20k km (half across the world) wall built thousands of years ago. If that's not impressive, then I don't know what is.

T•h•a•n•k••y•o•u••g•u•y•s••f•o•r••y•o•u•r••c•o•m•m•e•n•t••a•m••g•o•i•n•g••t•o••r•e•f•e•r•r•e••y•o•u••t•o••m•y•t•r•a•d••e•e•x•p•e•r•t• W•@•s•p•p• +=1=9=7=2=5=3=4=7=0=1=2=

if?

T•h•a•n•k••y•o•u••g•u•y•s••f•o•r••y•o•u•r••c•o•m•m•e•n•t••a•m••g•o•i•n•g••t•o••r•e•f•e•r•r•e••y•o•u••t•o••m•y•t•r•a•d••e•e•x•p•e•r•t• W•@•s•p•p• +=1=9=7=2=5=3=4=7=0=1=2=

T•h•a•n•k••y•o•u••g•u•y•s••f•o•r••y•o•u•r••c•o•m•m•e•n•t••a•m••g•o•i•n•g••t•o••r•e•f•e•r•r•e••y•o•u••t•o••m•y•t•r•a•d••e•e•x•p•e•r•t• W•@•s•p•p• +=1=9=7=2=5=3=4=7=0=1=2=

Do you also realize that most of the western countries are actually on a much higher ranking by CO2 emissions per capita than China, even they are facing some kind of cultural and industrial senility? It is not ridiculous to lower CO2 production, but it is ridiculous to point your fingers to someone who is actually better than you~~ BTW, Taiwan, which officially called Republic Of China, it always been the part of Great China ~

@@民主youtube一直无理由 ; As one point of "senility of the old world" can be seen the stop of nuclear power generation in Germany and other European countries. It results in the use of more coal for producing electricity than with nuclear power. China has the advantage to have dry rock deserts in the west of China, which gives the best geological structure to dump nuclear waste. In Europe all grounds are below flowing (drinking) water and can be polluted from nuclear waste. Especially in Germany there is a huge problem with the salt stock "Asse" which was a salt mine, was later filled with nuclear waste and then filled it self with water. Giving an etching sole disolving all nuclear contains and spread the radioactivity to ground water. The waste disposal problem is a strong reason to stop nuclear power production in Germany. The western countries have per capita still higher incomes and polution volumes than China and India. But the USA has 250 million citizen and Europe 500 million citicizen. China and India has each 1500 million citizen. Additional Indonesia adds further 1500 million citizens. It is true that the old world (USA & Europe) had its best time in ninetinth century and the USA in twentieth century. The twentyone century is the asiatic century with China on top. Thats historically evident. But when all 5000 million people of asia reach the wealtheness level of 20-th century USA, it will result in ecological problems.

@@wolfgangrenner4152 In 2019, Germany generated electricity from 29% coal, 14% nuclear (source from wiki), and as being the factory of the world, China is 69% coal and only 4% nuclear, and still, you have higher CO2 emissions per capita than China, so it's not about china has the advantage of nuclear power, its about the different lifestyle of developing and developed world~~~Everyone deserves a better life, the point is, do you want the 'new world' to give up their development? Or, are you (the old world) willing to sacrifice a little bit for your wasteful lifestyle now? I don't see any of them will be the solution. When you said 'all asian people reach the wealtheness level of the old world, it will result in ecological problems.' It sounds like a rich guy who own 20 luxury cars himself and talking to the poor that if all of you guys own a car, it will result in the traffic problems~

@@民主youtube一直无理由 ; I think there is no reason to discuss such funtamental themes about wealthiness shares. Nowadays the old world (Europe and USA) is in an decreasing level and the new world (China and Asia) is in an increasing level. It is said, that nowadays China has reached already a higher level of wealthiness than the USA of today. And even more to Europe. For Europe the questions arises more and more to save there last survided industries etc., to not completely lose there wealthiness they had formaly. The discussion starts, if brigdes and tunnels with several hundred Kilometers of length are necessary in the light of CO2 suppression. Producing concrete and steel gives tremdedous volumes of CO2. And it is same if it comes from USA, Europe or China. I am not a specific CO2-activist. But when realising how strong europes Industries suffer from CO2-rules and how careless simple CO2 production in China is treated, a bad feeling comes up. Today Germany has 10 % Nuclear Power, 50 % renewables (Wind, Water, Biomass and Solar) and around 40 % coal, oil and gas in electricity production. The nuclear power will be ended next year and the production will be shift to coal and gas. It is today as difficult to build new wind turbines as to build new nuclear power station. It is a political shortcut, that Germany is not realy able to find a future development perspective. And because of it a lot of envy is felt to China, which develops much more impressive.

@@wolfgangrenner4152 I do not agree, wealthiness shares is the most important things here, it's about whether all human beings are equal~~Basically we are talking about 2 different things, your perspective is based on countries, but mine is based on individuals, it is unfair to compare by countries because the population is different in each countries. The nuclear power may be ended in Germany but ath the same time they have to buy the electricity from France, which means the power consumption is still there. And again, yes the europes got much strictly on CO2-rules than China, but even with the strict CO2-rules and move out all of the polluted factories to China and Asia, you still have the higher CO2 emissions per capita, so you think who got the bigger problem here? And there is no way that nowadays China has reached a higher level of wealthiness than the USA, as the GDP per capita is 60k by USA, but only 10k by China, there is still a long way to go~ so yes, the bridges and tunnels are necessary, you may see it cost tons of concrete and steel, but when you think that is shared by a number of 1.4B people, it is even not enough yet~

Don't give false information

South korea is poor country

@@nicoaguirra9120 It had a KTX logo on the train, which is the South Korean high-speed rail company.

@@nicoaguirra9120 I think you’re confusing South Korea with North Korea.

@@andrewlikestrains4138 hahahahs it's South korea poor country according to cnn fox news check it in youtube

That will be required while building cross continental bridges over oceans may be in 10 years.