Тёмный

The major Supreme Court decisions to watch for in June | GZERO World with Ian Bremmer 

GZERO Media
Подписаться 102 тыс.
Просмотров 5 тыс.
50% 1

A look at major Supreme Court rulings expected this year, including former president Donald Trump's legal woes, abortion pills, homeless encampments, the power of federal agencies, and more
Subscribe to GZERO on RU-vid and turn on notifications (🔔): / @gzeromedia
Sign up for GZERO Daily (free newsletter on global politics): rebrand.ly/gzeronewsletter
In June, the US Supreme Court will begin issuing decisions on cases involving everything from reproductive rights to gun ownership to homeless encampments to former president Donald Trump’s criminal cases. Yale Law School Lecturer and staff writer at the New York Times Magazine joins GZERO World to unpack some of the biggest cases on the docket this year and what’s at stake in some of the major decisions expected to come down next month.
This year’s SCOTUS term comes at a time when approval for the Court is at an all-time low. As of September of 2023, a record 58% of Americans disapproved of how the Court handles its job. That follows multiple ethics scandals involving Associate Justice Clarence Thomas and a string of conservative decisions, including the 2022 Dobbs decision striking down the right to abortion, increasingly out of step with public opinion. With the Court wading into the 2024 election and former President Trump’s immunity claims, it risks being seen by the public as even more partisan and politicized.
“As an American, I want to have a good faith belief in the justices’ approach,” Bazelon says, “After a certain number of cases come out in particular ways, you start to feel like cynicism is realism about the Court."
Dig deeper: With public approval for the US Supreme Court at an all-time low, is it in danger of losing its legitimacy? Ian Explains here: • Ian Explains: Does it ...
Catch GZERO World with Ian Bremmer every week on RU-vid • GZERO World with Ian B...
Also available at gzeromedia.com/gzeroworld and on US public television.
Want to know more about global news and why it matters? Follow us on:
Instagram: / gzeromedia
Twitter: / gzeromedia
TikTok: / gzeromedia
Facebook: / gzeromedia
LinkedIn: / gzeromedia
Threads: threads.net/@gzeromedia
Subscribe to our RU-vid channel and turn on notifications (🔔): / @gzeromedia
Sign up for GZERO Daily (free newsletter on global politics): rebrand.ly/gzeronewsletter
Subscribe to the GZERO podcast: podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
GZERO Media is a multimedia publisher providing news, insights and commentary on the events shaping our world. Our properties include GZERO World with Ian Bremmer, our newsletter GZERO Daily, Puppet Regime, the GZERO World Podcast, In 60 Seconds and GZEROMedia.com
#GZEROWorld #SCOTUS #USSupremeCourt

Опубликовано:

 

5 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 14   
@user-je7in7ph2c
@user-je7in7ph2c Месяц назад
Clarence Thomas and Alito should resign ASAP.
@lawrenceralph7481
@lawrenceralph7481 Месяц назад
"Feel"? What does that have to do with legal reasoning? Feel is one of the most manipulative words in the langauge. Does it even have a place in jurisprudence? Logos and ethos, yes. Pathos, ? Who makes judgements with their feelings?
@lawrenceralph7481
@lawrenceralph7481 Месяц назад
How you feel about cases is not justice. Drop your feelings and use your reasoning skills.
@AlbertCloete
@AlbertCloete Месяц назад
Not true. All ethics are based on emotion.
@lawrenceralph7481
@lawrenceralph7481 Месяц назад
@@AlbertCloete revisionist baloney. Justice is based on law. Following the law. Due process. If ethics helps define law, the law is the basis of justice, not how you feel about it Well 12 jurors, Chief Justice, how do you feel about this? This is an absurd statement. Thank God. Feelings are the basis for arbitrary and capricious manipulation, as any parent of teen agers learns. Logos, ethos in law. Pathos no.
@sploosh1425
@sploosh1425 14 дней назад
Founding fathers did not envision people on the court for 40 years. We have multiple justices in their 50s who could be on the court for 30 years+ Thomas has already been on the court for over 30 years. Roberts and alito for 20. Is electing POTUS really a check on that staying power? A person could go through half of their adult life and only see one or two justices change. They need term limits. Still unelected and appointed by a president but they can only serve for 20-25 years. You could grandfather in any currently sitting justices.
@lawrenceralph7481
@lawrenceralph7481 Месяц назад
One of main reasons to considet caerfully the in office accomplishments of the past two presidents is to get a president next term that accomplishs things to improve America.
@PhantomOfManyTopics
@PhantomOfManyTopics 12 дней назад
Bazelwoke
@lawrenceralph7481
@lawrenceralph7481 Месяц назад
You seem to give more importance to the restive half of America, than the supportive half of America. Why? We are equally divided on culture war issues numerically although concentrated in regions with some significant pluralities.
@lawrenceralph7481
@lawrenceralph7481 Месяц назад
What do "taint" and "low public approval ratings" have to do with judging matters of law in court? Since you dislike the future likely outcome of the due process legal system, you offer your uncertain assessment of "public opinion" as an suitable alternate? Who is not abiding law here? Your offer "mob opinion" in favor of a considered detiled law abiding process? Please. Think clearly.
@owengg17
@owengg17 Месяц назад
Ya the amount of smug moralizing masquerading as logic there was hard to handle. Ian, I love ya buddy but please never have that relic of 20th century "individualism ad nauseum ad absurdism" back on your channel. Basically when you break it down all that person said was there's a lot of people who aren't going to agree with how the court is viewing things and that it might be time to political figures to intervene in the the courts to reset their perspectives. As someone who doesn't follow these things I was hoping to get a more substantive analysis of points made, counter arguments, etc. Instead, 20 minutes of my life I'll never get back, probably because this person has challenges with empathy.
@forklaundry
@forklaundry Месяц назад
Awful jokes
Далее
WHO DO I LOVE MOST?
00:22
Просмотров 14 млн
How to Fix a Broken Supreme Court | Robert Reich
3:47
Просмотров 438 тыс.
Supreme Court Shenanigans !!!
12:02
Просмотров 9 млн
WHO DO I LOVE MOST?
00:22
Просмотров 14 млн