The Marantz PM8006-My End Game Integrated Amp? 

Agree 100%

Thanks for watching

I paired my PM 8006 amp with a CD 6007 because I wasn't interested into streaming. Would you be so kind to tell me how good is the ND 8006 as a CD player, please ? Thank you.

How did you connected the sub to this amp? Using pre out?

@@nkredz21 yes. I used the pre out to connect my subwoofer

@@gregoriokakilala5734 thanks mate, planning to buy this amp just wondered how i can connect my edifier active sub to it..

Hope you enjoy it!

Have you got it yet? Could you share impressions??

Yes could you post your impressions

How is it!

Thanks for sharing

Pm8005 vs pm 8006??

PM8006@@frankmjolhus5082

any difference between KI Pearl Lite, 8005, 8006, 7005?

Very nice!

Is the midrange like 2x fuller? What are your speakers rated at?

It's not such a dramatic upgrade but I'd say the 8006 has a more transparent, a more refined sound compared to the 6006. At the time I was using a pair of SVS Prime Towers.

Currently running the Yamaha AS-801 which I really like. However Im interested in picking this amp up and moving the Yamaha for another set up. How would you compare the two and would you recommend this? Your time and opinion are much appreciated. Thanks

@@rufusluke4206 I had the Yamaha AS801, a good integrated amp for sure but IMHO, the Marantz is in a different class. As with any listening evaluation, this is a "subjective" matter for sure but I find the sound of the Marantz at a different level. Tight, authoritative lows, solid mids and highs throughout the spectrum, the Marantz is top shelf performer. Using toroid transformer for main power (expensive to make) in addition to all high end components, i.e. J-FET amps in the output stage which are known to be low noise (vs. the normal PNP/NPN transistor amps used in the 801). The Marantz uses huge 18,000 uF high-end caps in the filtering stage vs 12,000 uF caps in the Yamaha. On a side note, I have traveled to Japan several times over the past decades and found their work ethic on another level, and this unit is after-all "Made in Japan". From a user perspective, the tactile feel of the Marantz is superb to the touch, well thought-out with an amazing quality and feel to all controls. The amp itself is a beast, weighing in at 27 (plus) LBS, it weighs all of that with the triple layered solid construction to reduce or eliminate any potential distortion caused buy vibration manifestations. The Marantz is truly a solid bet, again, for the extra money over the price of the Yamaha, this unit is "highly recommended". Good luck in your decision.

@@rufusluke4206 I had the Yamaha AS801, and yes a good integrated amp for sure but the Marantz is in a different class by comparison. As with any listening evaluation, this is a "subjective" matter for sure but I find the sound of the Marantz at a different level. Tight, authoritative lows, refined solid mids and clear and concise highs throughout the spectrum, the Marantz is an exquisite top shelf performer producing amazing clarity of musical detail. Using a toroid transformer for main power (expensive to produce) in addition to all high end components, i.e. J-FET amps in the output stage which are known to be low noise and robust high current delivered when needed then immediately cut-off when not. The Marantz employs huge 18,000 uF high-end caps in the main amp filtering stage vs 12,000 uF caps in the Yamaha. Just on a side note, I have traveled to Japan several times and found the Japanese work ethic on another level, and the Marantz is a fine illustration of that ethic and quality of workmanship. From a user perspective, the tactile feel of the Marantz is superb, well thought-out with amazing quality and feel to all controls. The amp itself is a beast, close to 30 LBs, it weighs all of that with the triple layered solid construction to eliminate any potential distortion caused buy distortion due to vibration or harmonic manifestations. The Marantz is a solid bet - this unit is "highly recommended". Good luck in your decision.

@@rufusluke4206 Yes recommend the Marantz PM8006 over the Yamaha AS801 for several reasons, workmanship, quality, excellent phono stage input, FETs and huge caps (18000 uF each) in the main amp stage, tactile feel of all controls, clarity and channel separation is impeccable. The rear panel user user interface and layout is top shelf, total class. Soundstage is amazing with authoritative bass, mids and treble without being harsh, over bearing. Good luck in your decision.

@@cvee2614 Cant go wrong with that! Thanks for the detailed assessment.

How well does the cd6007 perform?

Since I have a streamer and a good dac, those are features I don’t need, and can upgrade independently. My sub is connected via the pre-outs on the 8006

Very nice!

I have used multiple headphones, and the amp sounds great

@@TheBoomerConsumer thanks for the reply, I'll keep it in mind :)

Here's a hot tip: Marantz Model 50 (replacement of the PM8006) with Dynaudio Evoke 10. Or else 2nd PM-11S2 and it sounds like this: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-at8oFv3tvJA.html

lol indeed

It's possible that it's too bright with source direct, which shouldn't contribute anything other than pure sound. However, without source direct it has more warmth on the vocals.

Dac is the topping D70 PRO Sabre, streamer is WiiM Pro

THe HDAM opamps give tne Marantz excellent bass kick.

I did at the 5:15 mark, Klipsch RP 600m, but for clarity sake I added them to the pinned comment as well.

I have a PM8006 and Aria 906. I would not say that this amp is bright, but it is a little "extended" in the treble I think, but very pleasant and smooth to listen to. It is also a quite powerful amp, perfect with Aria 906. The 936 has a lot of drivers and a steep impedance dip, so perhaps an even more powerful amp would be a better choice. Model 30 perhaps. Would love to try the 936 though:)

Thanks for the feedback👍

The phono stage is excellent, and one of the main selling points. As to what I said at that time was ..when I looked up the marantz, because again.

I like the 8006 phono stage much more than the Mani 2. I have both.

It is, but quality costs some money, and this should last many years.

Those are excellent

How does it differ from the pm8006?

I have not heard a 8005 sorry

How it sound with linton as Lintons are warm speakers and marantz mid is also warm. How is it.

@@pyntzer No problem at all. Just correcting a misinformation said by the uploader of this video.

The high end Yamaha's are made in Japan.

marantz is brighter / higher pitched than arcam? (or more elevated treble)

@@RelativeResonance couldn't tell you. arcam has a smoother sound in the midrange. i love it for vocals.

@@mikeutube7888 given the sa20 and maybe sa30 are class g, when playing at mid to low volumes they change into class a design. Making the lower range better. Heard the marrantz has bit more treble despite being warm by default. Imo the pm8006 wins. Very good build. You can change the tone, treble and bass. And im pretty sure it's a lot more efficient with power. I would have gone with sa20 if I only focused on sound. But build matters to me. Pm8006 supposedly should still be comfortable to listen to for extended sessions. Right? I haven't heard anything other than my parents Yamaha ax 400 from 1996 lol. So I'm just crossing me fingers.