idk why the funniest part for me is the \underset{n \text{ times}}{\underbrace{\dots}} like it really isnt necessary from how u specified the size of BOTH the upper and lower limit
I feel like a baby that has just seen a sunset or sunrise for the first time: I don't know what it is, I don't know what it does, I don't how it does. All I know is that it's beautiful, mesmerising, and glorious.
Bro I recently visited the subreddit of LaTeX and I’m scared now. These ceatures will make you and your family into a publishhed paper with all native TeX
i made my own version i think i cooked \underset{S\subseteq \mathbb{R}^n}{\int \cdots \int} f(\mathbf{x} \in \mathbb{R}^n)\mathrm{d}^n\mathbf{x} and you can define S as S = \left\{(x_1, \dots, x_n)\in \mathbb{R}^n; \, x_i \in \left[0, 1-\sum_{j=1}^{i-1}x_j ight] ight\} sidenote the d^n (bold x) is used in some textbooks so even though it's kind of abuse of notation it's generally accepted from what ive seen
are you kidding me? Your brain is simply too small to comprehend the level of ingenuity that went into developing this notation. It is going to revolutionize mathematics